Year of the Horse (1997) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
22 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
the music and off-beat style makes up any of the lulls in the interviews
Quinoa198412 July 2005
I wouldn't say that Year of the Horse, director Jim Jarmusch's only documentary, is one of the all-time great rock-docs (i.e. Woodstock, Last Waltz, Pink Floyd Live at Pompeii), but it does have many good things going for it, not the least of which the performances. Although some of the interview footage goes into some lulls and conventions (i.e. 'deep' explanations of how the band works, the fights, the self-conscious attitude of being in a film trying to capture 25 years in 2 hours), it's not as boring as I would've expected from the interviews. Some people have said this is like a Spinal Tap film that takes itself too seriously, and I can see where that criticism could stand. However, Jarmusch has a lot of pride in his experimental style, shooting only with 16mm & 8mm, mostly grainy or home-video style. The results are something of a very personal view into Young and his Crazy Horse people, some of whom seem to be more 'there' than others. A couple of segments though, like when Jarmusch reads from the bible to Young, or vintage footage of Scottish views on the band/shenanigans with the band in a hotel room, are quite entertaining on their own.

But for those looking for just the music instead of the interviews or talk, the film may or may not meet your expectations, depending on how much of a Neil Young fan &/or Neil Young & Crazy Horse fan you are. If you're of the latter, it's probably a must-see, with songs like "F***in' up", "Slips Away", "Tonight's the Night", and a couple of songs I've just plain never heard of before seeing the film. There's also the finale, with a half retro Young and present-day (1996 present day) performance of "Like a Hurricane", which will probably be the highlight for those who only are familiar with the hits of Neil Young, or for anyone. The best thing that I can say about the performances, as a little more than a casual observer/listener to Young/Crazy Horse's music, is that there is always this uncommon energy between all the players in the band. Even if what they're singing is loud or distorted or "grunge", they are having fun on stage, and the camaraderie is an enjoyable part of the performances. Jarmusch's style with these scenes ranges from wild and cool, to a step or two away from being a little pretentious or, worse, MTV style editing. Most of the time though, his vision works for the material, and in the end what we get is more of a glimpse at what Young & Crazy Horse are all about- a pure form of rock & roll, harder than the solo Young stuff if not as hard as the rockers of today, and its definitely not of the 'corporate' product pool. B+
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Interesting
TL271 April 1999
Ive seen about 3 other documentaries on Neil Young,but this one is the most interesting.Not just a typical concert film....but an overview of Crazy Horse.Some of the concert footage was a little long though.I am a big Neil Young fan and if you are also,you will like this movie.The best Crazy Horse movie is still Rust Never Sleeps ,though.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Nice film, shame about the solos
Teach-74 May 1999
I DO like Neil Young and Crazy Horse, yet I felt Neil's simplistic guitar solos took up more screen-time than I would have liked. That is my only reservation. Jarmusch' good-natured approach and sympathetic questions makes this watchable and revealing. Neil's father obviously has great respect for his son. And Frank Sampedro's cynical retorts were very funny! More to the point - "Like a hurricane" still sounds like a rock classic.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A MASTERPIECE!
KatMiss4 April 2001
Granted, non-fans of Neil Young will not like this film, but as one of his biggest fans (I have over 35 CDs of his music, solo and with CSN, Buffalo Springfield and others), I loved this film. Many people were put off by the grain of the Super 8 sequences, but I think that visual scheme ADDS to the mood and feel of his music.

I also liked the varied song list. Not only does he play songs from his most recent album of the time (Broken Arrow, an OK, but not great album) but he revisits his classics (Tonight's the Night, Barstool Blues, Like A Hurricane). It's a great sampler.

I also liked the weird humor that Young and Crazy Horse infuse into the documentary sequences. Many people were understandably turned off by this (including my mother and she LIKES Neil's music!)but I thought of it as in the Frank Zappa-vein of bizarre personal humor that only a handful of people fully get.

NOTE: If you buy this film, purchase the Canadian import version. It is presented in widescreen format (1.77:1 not 1.66:1 as listed in technical specs) The USA Films release is panned and scanned and believe me Jarmusch makes the most of the frame, no matter how small it is)It costs more, but believe me, it's worth the extra money!
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Very good, but...
M-273 September 1999
It´s a great movie but its problem is that you must be a great fan of Neil Young and the crazy horse to enjoy the film. Almost all the film are parts of concerts and if you don´t enjoy with their music you will get bored.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
7 for Neil fans -1 for just about anyone else
bhu736 September 2002
A supposed documentary of the 1996 tour by Neil Young and Crazy Horse, I got the feeling that the interviews were conducted with Neil standing just out of shot with a loaded weapon or paycheck. There is nothing revelatory about the interviews, most of the perfomance footage is average.... this is really only likely to appeal to the diehard.... I'm one of them and I struggled....
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
One for the fans
lastliberal7 June 2007
Jim Jarmusch (Broken Flowers, Ghost Dog: The Way of the Samurai) directed this documentary (his only one) of Neil Young and Crazy Horse's 1996 concert tour.

Jarmusch's grainy, home-movie style make this a very interesting film as we look into the background of the band.

Ten songs including "F*ckin' up", "Slips Away", and "Tonight's the Night". The only complaint I had about the music was Neil Young's guitar solos. They seemed to go on forever.

This movie is really for Neil Young fans. 20+ years of music history in a couple of hours.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Engrossing
tgrace103 April 2001
This film is a great documentary, i was not a fan of Neil young but was won over by this kooky depiction of Young's band crazy horse, Great music interesting people, the real life subjects of this movie resemble Jarmusch's loveable offbeat fictional charicters. A good Friday night film watch it
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Spinal Tap verite
lorne-219 May 1999
Around the 4th or 5th time that Frank "Pancho" Sampedro looks knowingly into the camera and asks how they can possibly capture "20 years of craziness in a few little questions," you get this urge to slap his hippy ass back to Mexico or wherever he came from with that bad moustache and nickname. Aside from these moments of Spinal Tap verite, you get Jim Jarmusch's idea of a rock and roll movie: long dull interviews and long dull performances. I like Neil Young and his music. I like Jim Jarmusch and his films. But unless you relish the idea of watching 3 middle-aged men standing in a circle hitting their whammie bars for 5 long minutes, stay home, put on "Rust Never Sleeps" & "Stranger Than Paradise", and have some of what Pancho's having.
8 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
As great as RUST NEVER SLEEPS.
mera_bullar25 June 2008
The point of this film is to catch the essence of Neil Young & Crazy Horse's strange sound. Their sound is interesting because it is based on pure emotions (according to Neil Young), and not so much on technical skills (if you listen to drummer Ralph Molina he plays like a 10-year old). This film should therefore appeal to anyone who's interested in music. In addition to that, in contains fantastic live performance by one of the truly great rock bands.

Why this film is good? It IS the essence of Crazy Horse - it is lo-fi, filmed with a shaky 8mm camera (but the sound is okay). It's trashy American feeling with the random interviews (like when guitarist "Poncho" questions why Jarmusch is doing this film) and all the on-the-road footage is also contributing to explaining how they work as a band, and therefore why the sound like they do. This film reflects the trashiness of Crazy Horse.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Seemed like it ran a year
helpless_dancer6 August 2002
You better like Neil or this will be an interminable trip through bad music hell. Not nearly as good as his '72 film "Journey Through the Past", it still had a few fun moments but was mostly dull interviews and grainy, endless concert footage. Young needs to drop the gangsta/rapper look; in fact the entire band appears to be a bunch of washed up, burnt out, middle aged head banger wannabes who look to have been ridden hard and put up wet. I was particularly amused by Pancho as he kept insisting the producers couldn't sew up 30 years of Crazy Horse with a camera and a couple of questions. What's to sew up? Drugs, whores, bad music, and a never ending childhood wouldn't beg more than 2 queries at most. I admit to liking a few of Young's songs but for the most part I consider him a 2 bit guitarist who pushes grunge a bit too far.
3 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Only for die hard Neil Young fans
brianhamilton-7640631 October 2018
Unless you're a Neil Young die-hard, you're likely to find Year of the Horse unbearable. What's especially shocking is that it comes from a talented director like Jarmusch, who is known for intelligent, thought-provoking pictures. Evidently, his feature film making ability doesn't translate into the documentary realm. Year of the Horse is one of 1997's ugliest dogs. It's supposed to be a high- energy concert film that captures the intensity and camaraderie of the band members on and off- stage. What it turns out to be, however, is an overlong home movie with bad video and barely- adequate sound.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
*****
wayfish1 March 2000
One of the best rock films ever made. It takes place simultaneously in the mid-70's, mid-80's, and mid-90's. One moment an older, rougher Neil begins "Like a hurricane", and without notice the soundtrack and visual jumps back twenty years to a leaner, meaner Neil. Very cool. Gotta see it if you're a NY fan!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Awful
cmleidi23 August 1998
I'd rather be pistol-whipped than watch this movie again.
2 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
very interesting
Jonas Kyratzes12 February 2002
Jim Jarmusch has always been one of my favorite directors, and I also happen to be a fan of Neil Young's music. I found this documentary very interesting and well-made. I suppose that it's not for everybody, though. Jarmusch can be a little strange at times (I like that, but other people might not).
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Different but That Doesn't Mean Good
Michael_Elliott15 May 2012
Year of the Horse (1997)

** (out of 4)

I can respect what Jim Jarmusch was going for. I mean, it's clear that the ugliness of this film was done on purpose but just because you respect someone for trying something different doesn't mean you have to be entertained by it. This documentary, the director's only to date, takes a look at Neil Young and Crazy Horse's 1996 tour with interviews with those involved as they discuss the history of the group. This includes a rather rocky road in the 1970s and various re-gatherings leading up to the '96 tour. Right from the start in big bold letters we're told about the 8mm, 16mm and various other formats used to create this film but whatever they were going for must have gotten lost in the mix because the end result is a pretty ugly film to look at and listen to. I understand the visuals of the film were probably meant to capture the mood and spirit of the music but by filming this way they've also delivered some rather ugly audio. I've heard a lot of people get upset over the selection of songs but as I've grown as a Young fan I've realized that he does what he wants and that includes releasing something with not too many hits. I didn't mind the song selection as the performances were quite good but sadly I thought the actual audio quality didn't do them justice. There was an interesting take on "Tonight's the Night" and a clever mix between an old and new performance of "Like a Hurricane" that was very good. With that said, the ugliness of the film also has some pretty boring interviews where Young and the band just keep talking and talking and quite often it's about a rather uninteresting subject. There's no question that Young die hards will want to check this out but others should probably avoid it.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Big Red Box
steve-382-75403028 May 2012
Felt obliged to write a review as none of the reviews posted so far seem to have been from people who saw this at the cinema. I was lucky enough to catch this in 97 at a film festival and the memory of it still lingers. The talking heads interviews are unmemorable, but the live concert footage is incredible. It's some of the rawest, most powerful and yet subtly controlled rock music to have ever been captured. I's also nice to see some essentially middle-aged guys rock out big time. It's hypnotic and savage, and every time Neil hits his custom big red box and kicks into a solo you can feel the passion oozing from the man. If you want something polished you'd be better of with some Pet Shop Boy's videos, but if you're after authentic blood, sweat and tears take a chance on this. And for god's sake either turn it up very loud or better still put some cans on and get the full effect.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A portrait of an artist
maggiesda25 March 2002
If you're a Neil Young fan, you will love this movie. The music is outstanding, almost mind-altering in it's depth and beauty. Yes, I call it beautiful even though it's raw and riotous, even though it's crude and vulgar, even though it sometimes feels like the harrowing of hell, it's beautiful music. Young's music is incomparable and his live performance shows you what an artist looks like when he's under the influence of his muse. He gives a succinct insight into his vision of true rock music: it never gets comfortable, it never gets tame, it never gets easy. Neil Young is in a class with Bob Dylan and Keith Jarrett: artists completely dedicated to their work. I highly recommend this movie. Jarmusch does an incredible job of combining 3 decades worth of footage into this 1996 tour. The interview with Jim Jarmusch and Young is very interesting: two artists talking about what they do.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Intense, distorted and fun.
Nicholas-1128 December 1998
Neil Young and his favorite back-up band Crazy Horse are filmed during his 1996 tour. Splendid concert footage(filmed in various formats to acompany the ragged music) is mixed with honest backstage footage from 1996, 1986 and 1976. The result is one the 90's best Rock'n' Roll pictures in a LONG time. Anyone interested in Rock should check out the distorted piece.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
tedious, flat moviemaking
Nog4 August 2001
some guy from manitoba weighed in here and i can only echo his comments. i have been a fan of this band since 1970 and now i feel like i would have been better off not seeing this film. i don't care to read interviews with musicians, and i knew neil only through his music. he comes off as being a rather dim guy (not knowing even roughly the distinction between the old and new testaments of the bible), getting in pointless arguments with the band. i am almost of the mind to say that the whole film is a put-on, that jim and neil thought it would be really funny to do a spinal tap-like thing, but if that is the case, the thing backfires. watching pedro talk, not once, not twice, but three times about how the filmmaker can't possibly do his job effectively may be the big wink, but ironically jim creates nothing but a tedious film that offers no enlightenment whatsoever into the people who are making this music, and the grainy 8mm (no doubt supposed to reflect the raw nature of crazy horse's music) only keeps us from seeing just how boring it is to watch these guys in action. i am living in berlin right now, and the germans just love neil, and some think this film shows a guy at the height of his powers (one review of the show at the waldbuhne actually claims his voice has mellowed and gotten less whiny). to me, the one-chord solos only reveal a guy who hasn't given his instrument much attention over the decades (but he can sure write songs!), and the feedback-drenched "we may never end this coda" philosophy has grown really, really stale to the point of self-parody. spinal tap indeed. jim, on the other hand, seems to think less is more. less insight, less clarity, and not a bit of interesting camerawork in over ninety minutes. for comparison, see what scorcese did with the last waltz or demme did with stop making sense. truly one of the worst portraits of a group i have ever seen.
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A vibrant rock and roll document.
kerat18 February 1999
Jarmusch has again succeeded in crafting a cinematic document that stands alone - even if it has been classified as belonging to a limited genre: the rock'n'roll documentary. Using different film formats and videotape, the director creates the impression of an uneven view - at times grungy, at times crystal sharp - that parallels the songwriting of the film's subject. Year of the Horse is a personal, caustic, poignant, raucous, intimate, joyous and always honest portrayal of a band and its leader. It is about survival, it is about being human, and it is about rock and roll. This film is, admittedly, not for everyone; an acceptance of Niel Young's unique approach to self-expression is a prerequisite... so is an acceptance of Jim Jarmusch's non-conformist approach to filmmaking.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Good concert film
mml-56 December 2001
I've been a moderate Neil Young fan for years but never saw him play.I've always enjoyed the chunky feedback laden sound of his work with Crazy Horse but never realized how much like the Grateful Dead they were. As I watched the three guitarists together on stage, they reminded me of the witches in Macbeth in the way that they huddled together, bouncing up and down, churning out this amazing wall of sound and power. While it wasn't "The Last Waltz", I thought it was pretty good.
0 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed