Where's Marlowe? (1998) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
14 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
FUN-tastic!!!
gevalher5 January 2003
I was near to enter to the realm of Morpheus, when I got this flick

on the cable. At first, I don't want to see this movie because in the

guide was advertised like a documentary. Wrong!

It is a movie who pretends to be a documentary, but who cares!

Because once I started seeing this film, I found it thought

provoking, interesting, and overall hilarious. There is a `killer'

scene near the end that made me laugh so strong that hurts.

Nice acting by one of my favorite actor from TV and movies, great

job Miguel!
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Making Home Movies 101
ronnie-1913 August 2000
I rented this movie last night without any idea of what it was, but even though it might have been rated as a one star movie, strangely I enjoyed it. It really flip-flopped around a lot and it was hard to keep track of the characters at times, but it was really pretty funny as a satire of P.I. movies. I got to rent it for a dollar, and it was surely worth that price. Miguel Ferrer was great as always. Even if a movie is so so, his acting is always first class.

If you are at the video store, and nothing else looks good, try this one.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
is this supposed to be funny?
cherold13 January 2004
This mockumentary looks like it's trying to be funny, with things that seem like vaguely comedic incidents, but after maybe a half hour of not laughing at all I decided to give up on it. Ferrer is a good actor and brings a sincerity to the role, but he doesn't have much to work with. Everyone else commenting here likes it, so perhaps it gets interesting sooner or later.
3 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Initially Shaky, Increasingly Clever, Ultimately Quite Enjoyable
secragt17 May 2004
To say this is a noir curiosity is to say The Bible has some colorful characters and quaint storytelling. Takes a good half hour to get going, but for those who keep faith, some serious plot twists and rather impressive surprises are in store, including one which takes the basic brilliant twist of CHINATOWN and goes it one better. It's very difficult to discuss this movie without spoiling things, however, so suffice to say there is more going on than meets the eye (frankly too much), and the filmmakers set out a challenging premise and very nearly pull off the impossible resolution. That they finally don't quite do it is almost more of a relief than a surprise, because given the dollar fifty budget and clear guerilla student filmmaking style which permeates this apparent vanity project for Ferrer, it would have been embarrassing had they actually hit a home run for about 1/10,000th of the cost of a typical low budget studio noir.

However, this is enough of a near-miss that anyone who is interested in noir (especially the iconic detective stuff personified by Mitchum and Bogart and Powell and Montgomery) would probably benefit from a look. The tone uneasily shifts between mockumentary and b-movie gumshoe melodrama, but occasionally succeeds at both just enough that the excursion is worth it for fans. Those who aren't patient will probably just scratch their head, but I'd guess if you've read this far, you are one of those who would enjoy it. Ferrer makes the most of his ample screentime. The rest of the cast are unknown to me; the black cameraman cum private eye has a few amusing moments, including the mugging of a few rather familiar lines of dialogue. 7.5 / 10
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
THE Grand American Private Dude Meta-Movie
lescrl11 May 2001
This practically undistributed movie deconstructs the deeply hilarious American Private Dude archetype MUCH more sagely/gently/smartly/straightly than the also amusing, if brazenly campy/overcooked/dumbed-down, "The Big Lebowski". Commercial media wizards reject complexity, especially comic complexity (anything not BROADLY slapstick/satiric?) BEFORE it can come to market? Apparently. Wonderful stuff. Rent/buy it if you can find it. You might be charmed. You might even wonder WHY our professional masters consider us so uniform? Or plumb stupid? If we want ONLY movies that wash over us sensationally, WAVES of light/sound, we don't need ANY movies that ask for our attention, our thoughtful participation. Of course. If, on the other hand...
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A sadly ignored film
jonathanv_0012 June 2005
I love this flick. I went to a test screening in L.A. a year or two (?) before its release, had the opportunity to make comments about the film, etc. Was looking forward to it coming out... and then never heard of it again until it came out two years or whatever later on. I must have been the only person in the screening who liked it.

Took the wife to it when it came out in theaters, and it still made an impression on me the second time. Sure, it's a bit uneven and takes a while to figure out where it's going, but it's a fun movie with some neat twists and more originality than many other films out there these days.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Simply smarter and funnier than anything else out there.
jg-1224 December 1998
As Hollywood continues to dumb down in its relentless pursuit of the lowest common denominator, a film as funny and smart as "Where's Marlowe" is just too good to be true. I was lucky enough to catch it at the First Annual Worldfest-Flagstaff film festival, where it was a huge hit. Unfortunately, the film is such a clever 'reveal' that to describe it at all would be to take away from the pleasure of being caught in its web. So all I can suggest is that you do whatever you can to get this film seen. Bug the distributors! Demand it at festivals! You'll be glad you did.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A sleeper that keeps your interest and actually entertains.
deadsenator10 May 2001
Channel surfing one night, saw Miguel Ferrer, stopped flicking and I'm so glad I did. How do movies like this not make more impact at the box office? Probably because there are no explosions or chase scenes and the audience was forced to think. Ahh, the horrors of having to think. Bullets don't fly around, but boy does the plot ever! I found myself thoroughly entertained throughout and even a bit confused sometimes, but I think that was the idea. Solid performances from everyone, including the script and direction. The camera work was excellent. Miguel Ferrer is a wonderful actor and more surprising than the standard top ten Hollywood throws at us nonstop. Miguel, this piece of work is rock solid. Keep it up.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Delightful, indeed
folie12 April 2000
I definitely agree with previous comments. The movie is delightful! Although this is not the first or best mockumentary around (i.e. not ground breaking), it is a very funny satire without being overly tongue-in-cheek.

It took a while to get here (Vancouver, Canada) and probably won't stick around too long (there are 5 people in the Sun matinee screening I attended). That's really sad...it is 10 times more entertaining than most of the mainstream movies playing in the multiplexes.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
for fans of "The Office" and "Spinal Tap"
IDs_Ego16 October 2007
It's an "8" for what it is, earning an extra point for being too original at the time. It's a mockumentary ala "Spinal Tap" and "Best in Show" which, frankly, are better, but this stands on its own. Following a second-rate private dick in LA, it jumps the "fourth wall", and incorporates the film crew, adding to the fun. One of the best things about it is its layers of droll that I suspect will not unfold until I see it again.

Having been weaned on Cristopher Guest's best (Tap, Waiting, Best, et al), and the TV hit "The Office", one thing this mockumentary has that it probably shouldn't have had... was a soundtrack. But, it was an ABC pilot order, and without any backup like a borrowed British TV success (The Office), that was unavoidable at the time. The soundtrack's not bad, but it does detract.

It's a fun attack on that line that separates Reality and the silly joke called life.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Delightful blending of hard-boiled detective story with mockumentary format
dilbert29 October 1998
The premise: Two young documentary filmmakers set out to make a film about a two-man detective agency in Los Angeles, led by Miguel Ferrer as John Boone. But things fall apart, and they get involved in the story, losing professional distance and objectivity, with hilarious results.

This is an absolutely marvelous film, and the mockumentary format lends an odd feel to it that's hard to explain. You'll just have to go see it.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Take your time with this kindly mockumentary
lizziebeth-127 June 2002
Warning: Spoilers
WARNING: POSSIBLE SPOILERS.

This is yet another independent art-house movie. It is film noir apparently shot in colour by the actors using handhelds. It uses Soderbergh's Out_of_Sight(1998) technique (stalls the footage while the sound continues, the footage catches up later) to good effect. The main task of Where's Marlowe is probably to examine platonic male relationships (male bonding vs male competition) although ostensibly it's a mockumentary about how a couple of film school jocks come to agree to have their subjects turn the tables on them.

The plot revolves around a routine surveillance job at a private investigating firm which suddenly turns into a Black Dahlia case for the remaining PI when his partner turns out to have been intimately involved. When that mature partnership falls apart, we see a more immature one, the one between the filmmakers, begin to follow in similar footsteps. Despite all their best intentions, the men remain isolated by their inattentiveness to each other's emotional lives. When one PI resorts to a video introduction agency, we realize he is simply trying to fill a need not met by his male relationship(s).

Quite gently, Where's Marlowe makes film noir itself seem nothing more than an expression of stodgy male attitudes. Every character - those who populate the case files of the LA PI firm, the staff at the firm, as well as the filmmakers themselves - are cookie cutouts, clichés, as per noir formula. By allowing the audience to be flies on the wall, and by using the ending as a ploy, Where's Marlowe becomes a self-referential (in computer language, "recursive") mockumentary, but the extremely surgical casting has assured that we get our money's worth out of the mockumentary style. Special mention must be made of Elizabeth Schofield's and John Livingston's performances. Miguel Ferrer is of course perfect as the sardonic but macho-foolish PI, Joe Boone (he criticizes the filmmaker's previous documentary about the New York water supply for not having any sex scenes). But Schofield's Monica Collins is also spot on as the mesmerizing yet dignified wife, as is Livingston's puppy-Elvis-like charisma as AJ Edison, the showier young filmmaker.

All the characters are kindly comments about human frailties, and there are enough highly talented supporting actors to flesh out each and every cliché admirably. Everyone is very good, but sadly the noir limitations make most of them forgettable.

In its distinct second half, the movie forces our naive young filmmakers to cope with the more mature themes of sex, betrayal and murder, yet somehow still come up with the documentary output we see. Wilt (Mos Def) and AJ (John Livingston) represent a yin and yang whole when they together decide to "get into the beauty part" of what they were taught in class. Both young filmmakers double as replacement PI's, but it is only AJ who is foolish enough to ape Boone. Livingston is both funny and cringeworthy, and he gives Ferrer some funny turns slapping the young puppy down. Ferrer is hilarious when he literally bellows at AJ at the mansion door, and when he sardonically orders the self-important kid off his desk. So Boone gets a run for his money, but the cookie cutout formula is never in danger. Mos Def's Wilt is the sensible yin to AJ's over-the-top yang in their partnership. This is a fairly crucial point. Actual results of their co-operation might be a bit hit-and-miss, but it's a joy watching their camaraderie in action. They are always on the same page, even in disagreement, except when AJ tries to pull rank on Wilt for no good reason. Somehow, Wilt has the patience of Job with him, and we wonder why. Wilt is wonderfully non-violent for a black man. I loved his rejection of the fake gun. Sadly he only has one really funny line, an improvised Arnie takeoff: "Ahm lookin foah Sara Conna".

We conclude that partnerships and relationships - if they last any appreciable length of time - take work, because people have to grow up in them. They can be either good or bad depending on the strength of character of the people who constitute them. Unless you 1) choose well first and then 2) keep paying constant attention to keep up with your partner's perceptions and emotions, your relationships may turn out to be a liability instead. Most people are pretty good at 1) but suck at 2).

The self-mocking is very refined, very competent, but I couldn't warm to the deliberately ambiguous ending, using a cheap ploy which is supposed to be worthy of our time. Sadly it isn't, but it's an added bonus to discover you can plumb new depths with the rewind button.

The soundtrack, consisting mostly of a continuous loud bongo riff that never goes anywhere, is rather annoying, but there is a bonus impromptu session at the end of the credits. Our two filmmakers, Wilt and AJ, harmonize without accompaniment to the, ah, usually artist-defeating Miles Davis classic All Blues, which, for those who don't know, sounds like all jazz instead. This would seem overly ambitious for these young actors, until you realize that Mos Def, aka Dante Beze, is a respected Brooklyn-based hip hop artist, and John Livingston was Musical Director to a prestigious a-capella group of Stanford undergrads.

There is real death, urns, loved ones and cremations, not to mention violence for violence, some of it even unintentional. Along the way there are also prolific and truly humongous examples of "canine malfeasance", rubber guns that get you just as dead, and PI's who rather fancy themselves as worthy improvisers in documentaries such as this. If you find yourself not really fond of this kindly mockumentary, then watch it again. Writer/ Director Daniel Pyne has certainly had plenty of time to hone his subtle messages, so you should take your time too. He does know what he's doing. 8.5 out of 10.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Before Art, There Was Fact !
elshikh412 December 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Nice film indeed with a lot of funny stuff and good meanings to be said. You'd feel sometimes that it was made by some people who lived all their life in love with (Humphrey Bogart)'s old movies as the sarcastic dusty typical detective of the 1940s, and now they saw themselves as too much of a viewer, too naive to be (Bogart) in real life. So they brought that sense of lost idealism, wished for heroism, and that desire to be movie makers, or even movie's leads, all on screen to answer the tricky question.. Where is Marlowe?!

There are some interesting and amusing points in that indie movie: The deep and uncomplicated script, the unique cinematography by video which's done by successful realistic taste; showing the scenes like true events, the idea of the blind seller as all the characters are blinded in a way; but the thing is who can see that about himself to admit it and then fix it?, the idea of their first documentary about "Water"; it's everyone's experiment, as those 2 well-meaning artists are still so childish and without experience yet, and also as pure as distilled water; in fact, they needed all the time to distill something out of their life which was simply empty, and not to distill something out of the other's; namely detective (Joe Boone) without being in his shoes, or having his own tribulations!

(Boone) was right when he told them how lousy and boring their first movie was. Because there is no actual thing was happening; it's tasteless as water. However, when they were right in the middle of a hot one; that was really moving. So he told them clearly the advice of: "Don't be behind that camera too long, or most of the time". Because afterwards, it becomes such a barrier to feel things, to live the fact, and to make your own point of view, your own original copy of the truth!

I also loved the acting which was very simple to a truthful extent, with couple of naive blinded kids and one clever humble private "eye", who discovered after all that they were in want of each other to learn more about life, and how to look at it to find what they really want.

So, the lesson is: before you show life, you must live it first. And maybe it's some kind of message that aims for any young artist out there, or anyone who thinks that they had all the facts from their only conceited perspective. Hence, "Where is Marlowe?!", well.. He's not in the movies only for sure. And he is in our own selves, but who has wide-open eyes to see him, and be that lively to bring him out as well; since (Sam Spade), (Philip Marlowe), or any other imaginary idealistic hero--are possible. They come initially from the factual life, and such a struggling human experience.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
After this movie, no movie looks the same...
nagual-36 February 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I could not agree less to that being a mandatory movie to truly watch and compare to your own experiences, otherwise you may be missing the point and should think twice about reviewing your own inventory before posting. It's not about P.I., it's about you!

On par in insight with with the great likes of Mulholland Dr., Dogville and many others. It may change your mind! Or set it aflame in the least.

As for water, the introduction has a very proper spoiler in decently suggestive skin. I too choose to believe it is the spirits - our ancestors and animals.

If you liked being in Malkovic's head, do not overlook this one!
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed