Evil Ambitions (1996) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
What happened to Lucy?
babeulous18 December 2001
The beautiful blonde on the video box cover is Lucy Frashure playing "Julie Swanson." She registers a credible character: innocent, shocked, terrified. I wonder if she tried acting again under some other name, or gave it up. Ms. Newmann is serious about her role, too. She plays it on two levels, as the scheming evil Satan's agent, but with a hint of playfulness. And I sort-of believed Ms. Rochon's "Madame Natalie." The rest of the cast is just blandly going through the motions.

This picture suffered from a really bad sound track. The music is kind of interesting, but the dialog recording has so much background noise of every kind (fans, blowers, and people walking around on the set, and hum and hiss in the recording) that the dialog is barely intelligible. It began to remind me of a Dr. Who episode, or a daytime soap before they got big budgets. A little ADR would have done a lot for this show. Editing is really loose, too. There's a lot of wasted time between one character's line and the next, which would have been edited out in a more thorough production.

Ten points for Lucy, eight for Amber, five for the script, and none for production.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
woefully bad
movieman_kev26 April 2007
I saw this under the name of "Satanic Yuppies". At the beginning of the film they joke that it's based on a true story, if you believe that then there really is no help for you. Anyways the flick is about a public relations firm called Inferno, that's a secret cabal of Satan worshipers (the girl who hires Julie, the newest recruit, proudly exclaims that Rush Limbaugh is a client, how edgy) and a newspaper reporter out to uncover the truth about them as well as a local congressman. The movie plays the material for comedy, but it fails pretty badly, in no small way because of porn-caliber acting. It also feels padded, and could've used a tighter editor. Produced by B+ productions, I only mention that as I find that kinda funny and too optimistic as B+ is far from the grade I'm going to give it.

Eye Candy: Amy Ballard, Lucy Frashure, Glori-Anne Gilbert, Kindra Laub, and Katie Wilke all get topless in the film; Dakota Summers and one other girl provide full frontal

My Grade: D
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Busty and Beautiful
lastliberal13 July 2008
This movie started off saying it was based on true events that happened in Cincinnati in the summer of 1996. It bugged me the whole movie because the movie came out in the fall of 1996. Were they filming the true events as they happened? Is this then, in fact a documentary? Well, we know this is not possible, just a silly joke on someone's part. There were some real jokes in the movie, and I do appreciate the fact that they tried to do horror with some humor. Don't get me wrong, it is not a comedy.

I really liked Amber Newman as the PR lady. She seemed to really make an effort to play her part well. Maybe that is why she went on to a long career with films such as Mari-Cookie and the Killer Tarantula in 8 Legs to Love You . Seriously, she was good. Renae Raos also played well. I wonder what happened to her? But, this is about busty and beautiful (her own words) Debbie Rochon. She is consulted by Pete (Paul Morris), the cigar chomping reporter. She warns him, but it does not good. At least he ends up with Julie (Lucy Frashure, another one-time actress).

The roles are getting better, Debbie.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
If only they had the money ....
Scoopy9 October 2000
How many times have you watched an overblown, overproduced studio production like Coppola's "Dracula" and thought to yourself "I could make a better movie than that in my basement with my friends"?

Well, the makers of this film thought the same thing. They took a few grand and make a homemade video.

In all honesty, the film does have one strength. It has a good script. It's basically an r-rated version of a "Night Stalker" episode. (The main reporter character is even named McGavin). The plot is coherent, some of the characters are interesting, and there are some very funny lines.

Example:

High priestess: "Do you take Satan to be your lawful spouse, in richer and even richer ..... etc"

Bound and gagged victim: (makes fearful struggling noises).

High priestess: "I'll take that as a yes"

Satan himself is also funny, the ultimate achievement-oriented corporate guy, kind of similar to the Christian Bale role in American Psycho. And the Kolchak-like reporter has some pretty good wisecracks.

Real movie companies, with real budgets, have filmed worse scripts than this. Much worse.

But then there's the matter of the execution. The lighting is funky and too dark. The fight scenes involve people falling off-camera. The special effects consist of people leaning backward.

The acting is, well ....

Let's just say this is your movie if you go to porno films because you love the acting, but you actually hate porn. Most of the lines are delivered with the same flat monotone that you'd expect from local furniture store owners reading their own TV commercials off cue cards.

Oh, well. The script is still OK for a few laughs, and could be pretty good if professionals delivered the lines.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Cincinnati and Satan
BandSAboutMovies22 January 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Directed and written by Mark Burchett and Michael D. Fox (Vamps, Blood Sisters: Vamps 2), this movie is also known as Evil Ambitions and really is 1996 in its most pure and distilled flavor.

The Satanic Yuppies in the title are politician Gideon Jessup (David Levy) and model agency owner Brittany Drake (Amber Newman, Horrorvision, Hell-O-Ween) and they have marked Julie Swanson (Lucy Frashure), a virginal fresh off the bus and new in the big city girl for Satan's bride. And by the big city, I mean Cincinnati, because dead bodies keep showing up in the Ohio River.

Reporter Peter McGavin (Paul Morris) is on the case, despite being warned by his boss Miles Bishop (S. William Hinzman, the Flesheater not in zombie mode) to just forget all about it. You know who does get him off the trail? Brittany, who owns him from the minute they speak. At the same time, another girl he runs into gets kidnapped by the cult's long-haired killing machine Lester (Rob Calvert).

Despite the sexual dynamo throwing herself his way, McGavin finds his way back to his story and gets help from phone sex operator/literal ghostwriter of Mae West's autobiography Madame Natalie Goldfarb (Debbie Rochon), who informs him that the first four murders were to create the bridesmaids of the devil and the fifth murder will be his bride, at which point, kind of like a godfather at an Italian wedding, Satan must give a favor to whoever put the nuptials together.

After killing Detective Leslie Kellogg (Renee Raos), the police officer who was trying to help McGavin, with a blue blur while she's in the bathtub, a succubus is sent to take our protagonist and make him a member of the cult. But when Satan (Randy Rupp) shows up, it turns out he's not all that pleased with the rich and powerful who are following him.

While the protagonist is lame and you'll probably be more of a fan of Newman's evil mistress of the dark arts - and modeling - this is by no means a bad film. It looks a lot like a 1990s adult film from VCA, with that plastic bright video quality, yet just hints at the sex instead of giving it to you. That said, if suddenly people started having sex for real, I would in no way be surprised.

Between Hinsman and Rochon being involved, how did John Russo not get into this movie?
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed