Release CalendarTop 250 MoviesMost Popular MoviesBrowse Movies by GenreTop Box OfficeShowtimes & TicketsMovie NewsIndia Movie Spotlight
    What's on TV & StreamingTop 250 TV ShowsMost Popular TV ShowsBrowse TV Shows by GenreTV News
    What to WatchLatest TrailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily Entertainment GuideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsCannes Film FestivalStar WarsAsian Pacific American Heritage MonthSummer Watch GuideSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll Events
    Born TodayMost Popular CelebsCelebrity News
    Help CenterContributor ZonePolls
For Industry Professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign In
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
  • Trivia
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Indictment: The McMartin Trial

  • TV Movie
  • 1995
  • R
  • 2h 11m
IMDb RATING
7.5/10
4.6K
YOUR RATING
Indictment: The McMartin Trial (1995)
DramaThriller

Lawyers and the media argue the alleged child abuse at the McMartin preschool in Manhattan Beach, California.Lawyers and the media argue the alleged child abuse at the McMartin preschool in Manhattan Beach, California.Lawyers and the media argue the alleged child abuse at the McMartin preschool in Manhattan Beach, California.

  • Director
    • Mick Jackson
  • Writers
    • Abby Mann
    • Myra Mann
  • Stars
    • James Woods
    • Mercedes Ruehl
    • Lolita Davidovich
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • IMDb RATING
    7.5/10
    4.6K
    YOUR RATING
    • Director
      • Mick Jackson
    • Writers
      • Abby Mann
      • Myra Mann
    • Stars
      • James Woods
      • Mercedes Ruehl
      • Lolita Davidovich
    • 42User reviews
    • 9Critic reviews
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • See production info at IMDbPro
    • Won 3 Primetime Emmys
      • 8 wins & 15 nominations total

    Photos22

    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    + 14
    View Poster

    Top cast92

    Edit
    James Woods
    James Woods
    • Danny Davis
    Mercedes Ruehl
    Mercedes Ruehl
    • Lael Rubin
    Lolita Davidovich
    Lolita Davidovich
    • Kee McFarlane
    Sada Thompson
    Sada Thompson
    • Virginia McMartin
    Henry Thomas
    Henry Thomas
    • Ray Buckey
    Shirley Knight
    Shirley Knight
    • Peggy Buckey
    Mark Blum
    Mark Blum
    • Wayne Satz
    Alison Elliott
    Alison Elliott
    • Peggy Ann Buckey
    Chelsea Field
    Chelsea Field
    • Christine Johnson
    Joe Urla
    • Glenn Stevens
    Scott Waara
    Scott Waara
    • Dean Gits
    Valerie Wildman
    Valerie Wildman
    • Diana Sullivan
    Richard Bradford
    Richard Bradford
    • Ira Reiner
    Roberta Bassin
    Roberta Bassin
    • Judy Johnson
    Patricia Belcher
    Patricia Belcher
    • Juror #1
    Gabrielle Boni
    Gabrielle Boni
    • Tara
    Kathy Brock
    • Sybil Brand Deputy
    • (as Kathryn Brock)
    Betsy Brockhurst
    • Angry Parent
    • Director
      • Mick Jackson
    • Writers
      • Abby Mann
      • Myra Mann
    • All cast & crew
    • Production, box office & more at IMDbPro

    User reviews42

    7.54.6K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Featured reviews

    10Skeptic459

    You have faith in our legal system?

    Because I don't! I defy anyone who has ever been involved in a serious legal trial to state that western nations have a great and just legal system. The Mcmartin trial represents a real failure of our system and should be a warning of what can happen.

    Similar trials happened in Australia, England and here in New Zealand. We had an innocent man here put in prison on the basis of hysteria. Although, many conspiracy nuts would state that abusive satanic cults exist and are covered up by the highest levels of government.

    The actors that play the Mcmartin's are very good and you real feel sorry for them as they are caught in a nightmare not unlike Kafka's, the trial. James Woods is also good playing the motor mouth defence lawyer. Oliver Stone is also involved as the producer, which is no surprise. I bet both of these guys know whats up and want to expose the stupidity that was America's longest and most costly legal battle. Remember this trial went for 10 years!

    The film explores all the things that made this trial a joke. The highly leading questions asked by social workers to children. The fact that Mcfarlane pressured the children to admit to sexual abuse. The politicians using this as a spring board to getting elected. The fact that the children even identify Chuck Norris as one of the villains. The correctly defined anatomical dolls. Judy Johnson and her bizarre alcoholic, schizophrenic ravings. The children giving bizarre confessions where they would be flown out to places to be abused. Then came satanism. The children stating that they were brought through tunnels and abused underground. No physical evidence of tunnels were ever found under the Mcmartin pre-school. The Mcmartins apparently dressed in black robes, chanted and ritually abused the children according to the victims.

    Does anyone find any of this highly unlikely?

    Normally if you are going to sexually abuse children, by the time you get to Peggy Buckey's age you have a major history. Child molesters do not just fall out of the sky. This case is about cultural anxiety. At this point in history the two genders had become more equalized. Both mom and dad were working. So more and more parents were dropping off their kids at daycare centers. The problem was that many people felt very nervous about their kids being at these centers. An actual book came out reporting abuse that went on in daycare centers. I have not read this book but I would imagine only a minority of centers would be abusive to kids. As things become more equal the divorce rates were also increasing as woman were walking out of bad marriages. This just increased the uncertainty felt at this time.

    The problem is that there are still people who think that the Mcmartins are guilty. I am all for stopping molesters but this is just getting hysterical. It is exactly the same as the Salem witch trials. We think that we have changed since then. Well we haven't really! We can still just as easily deceive ourselves. If you look around the web you will still find websites that claim that the tunnels existed and there was a huge government cover up. Why would the government bother? Even if the Buckeys were working for a satanic pornography ring that is connected to the government, which I highly doubt. Why wouldn't the government then hang the Buckey's out to dry if they were caught? If they stated that they were satanic molesters working for the government then they would look crazy.

    The other pet peeve I have about this case is that Kee Mcfarlane and her ilk were never held accountable for their actions. Social workers and mental health workers should be held more accountable. Mcfarlane's poor interview techniques caused children to believe that they were victims of a satanic cult. It seems the higher up in the food chain that you are. The more likely that you'll never be held accountable for your actions. It is a sad fact but in my experience and observations, it is a true fact.

    Satanic ritual abuse has been proven to be false. The whole thing collapsed when the FBI, lead by Kenneth Lanning, COULD NOT FIND ANY EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER of the existence of any satanic cults. Lanning's official report is available online. However the conspiracy nuts state this is just more evidence of a cover up. That the FBI are part of this satanic cult or that the cult is so extraordinarily tricky that they avoid detection. I don't know about you dear reader but this sounds ridiculous to me! Lanning used the sound logic that the bigger the cult the more physical evidence that they would leave. None was ever found.

    The infamous Laurence Pazder was even involved in this trial. The man who with Michelle Smith gave us Michelle remembers. The book that started the whole SRA hysteria. Why satanism? If you ACTUALLY read Anton Lavey he states that you should treat animals and humans with respect. His writings are also a rip off of Ayn Rand. Some ultra right wing people will be disturbed and not very happy about that fact!

    I would also like to add that this hysteria still goes on. The case of the West Memphis three to me is the most infamous. You have three young men convicted of child murder. Why? Because they dared to dress in black, explore alternative belief systems, such as Wicca and listened to heavy metal. Most notably Metallica. Madness! All of this is dangerous madness!

    The last peeve I have is that because of this mess. The teaching profession has taken the most major blows. Here in New Zealand there are few male teachers, 90 percent of teachers are now female. This issue is one of the major factors of why men no longer want to become teachers. They are afraid of being accused of child molestation. Men who want to work with children, especially young children, are considered to be strange. No real man wants to work with kids! This modern hysteria has only added to this cultural stereotype. As a result our school system suffers as boys struggle to find male role models. Boys are failing but girls are succeeding.

    Some films have to be watched so we can learn from them and not repeat our own mistakes. This film is also a critique of the legal system. To me it illustrates that some fundamental changes have to happen for our legal system to function adequately. I give this 10 out of 10 and think everyone should have to watch it. All those who have never had dealings with the courts, well this is an education and a half.
    8SnoopyStyle

    compelling story

    It's 1983. Police receives a complaint from Judy Johnson of her son's molestation at the McMartin family-run pre-school daycare center in Manhattan Beach, California. Eventually over 60 children make accusations of outrageous abuse at the school run by 76 year old Virginia McMartin (Sada Thompson) prodded by child-psychiatrist Kee McFarlane (Lolita Davidovich) and her questionable techniques. Virginia's grandson Ray Buckey (Henry Thomas) is at the center of the accusations. Callous defense lawyer Danny Davis (James Woods) is eager to take the case stoked into a media circus by Wayne Satz. Lael Rubin (Mercedes Ruehl) is self-righteous prosecutor. They arrest Ray, Virginia, his sister Peggy Ann (Alison Elliott), mother Peggy (Shirley Knight), and teachers Betty Raidor and Babette Spinler. Prosecutor Glenn Stevens pulls the case together discovering it to be built upon conflicting testimonies from the children.

    This is a compelling true story. It's told from the defense's side although I'm not sure what the prosecution's side would be. It's a harrowing case. James Woods brings his energetic persona to full force. The case is riveting and utterly memorable. It is a great award-winning TV movie from HBO.
    8jmorrison-2

    Stunning, Disturbing

    Tremendously disturbing and well-acted film. What is most troubling is the fact that this episode really occurred. Remarkable portrayal of how easily something like this can get so totally out of control. It is hard to imagine this feeding frenzy among, supposedly, educated and sophisticated people. James Woods is dead-on perfect as an initially slimy, opportunistic attorney, who finds himself slowly horrified by what he finds himself in the middle of. His courtroom questioning of Dr. McFarlane (Lolita Davidovich)is riveting. An impressive, well-done movie, but extremely troubling for what it says about our justice system.
    Alex-372

    Important Movie

    Indictment is a movie showing how untested pop psychology and bad (circular) reasoning can still produce witch hunts in this day and age, and an appeal to both the viewer and the public in general to always keep a critical eye towards the facts like a laser beam.

    Nor was this case a one-off. In fact, when I saw the announcement for this movie, I thought it was about the "Little Rascals Day Care Center" in Edison, NC. Only a year before the McMartins were released from jail, an almost cloned incident happened in Edison, when the owner, Robert Kelly jr. and his wife were charged with massive child abuse - as well as satanism, cannibalism, abductions... they were also accused of taking the children along in space ships, killing animals, sacrificing babies in the middle of the day care center during open hours, etc (although no children were ever reported missing). There too, the case started out with a single vindictive mother with an agenda of her own, and was built upon "recovered memories", etc.

    However, unlike the McMartins, who spent up to half a decade in jail awaiting trial, the Kelly's were actually convicted and sentenced to twelve consecutive life sentences. Their convictions were later quashed on appeal.

    What is also shown out in this movie is the way "true believers" think. Kee, played by the gorgeous Lolita Davidovitch, doesn't look for corrobable evidence, but simply affirmation of her already drawn up conclusions. Here is where the circular thinking comes in. When a child is asked if it has been abused, and the answer is yes, then it must be telling the truth. However, if the answer is no, then something must be keeping them from telling the truth, in this case, "they're in denial". And so they will be cojoled, even threatened, until the answer is yes. They how's, when's and even who's are less important, and as a result many of testimony becomes fantastical, even impossible. Or, to quote from an article on False Memory Syndrome:

    "When the victim responds, " but I get along fine with my parents, they aren't perverts". - the trusted advisor responds, "Wow, they must have been really horrible for you to have repressed it that deep. If you won't recall, you won't get better." "

    Also, Gerardo and OJ trial regular Ira Reiner (who gravely described OJ's gloves as "loosely fitting, working man's gloves") don't come off very well at all, not surprisingly.

    Nor have these modern witch hunts limited themselves to North America - there have been similar mass arrests after allegations of satanic abuse in the north of Scotland, recently in the UK the daily mail undertook a campaign of publicly naming child molesters, many of whom were confused with other people, one man had a neckbrace like one of the men in the newspaper and needed police protection after both his and his neighbors house had been stoned, and a PEDiatrician needed protection after children had painted "PEDo" on her house. Nor is mass hysteria and mass psychology limited to child abuse - recently in Holland a scuzzy politician tried to whip up public support by claiming as "outrageous" the number of middle aged citizens of Maroccan and Turkish descent claiming disability - totally and conveniently ignoring the fact that among the physically demanding and dangerous industries, like steel, chemicals, and the cleaning industry, these groups were hugely over represented in the decades after WWII and still are today.

    This movie is an indictment of mass hysteria, and is an appeal for every citizen to think for him or herself, and be very critical, even cynical of whatever news is presented to them on a platter every night at six.

    See it.
    8AlabamaWorley1971

    Appalling tale of "justice" run wild

    The pursuit of legitimate child abusers is worthy indeed, but this movie shows how it can quickly get out of control. It also shows how people who start out to protect victims can fall in love with their own reputations along the way. I'm sure all the "bad folks" in this story started out with all the best intentions. James Woods and Henry Thomas stand out in a strong cast. This is a very important story.

    More like this

    Mistrial
    5.6
    Mistrial
    Citizen X
    7.4
    Citizen X
    Witness Protection
    6.2
    Witness Protection
    You Don't Know Jack
    7.5
    You Don't Know Jack
    Path to War
    7.3
    Path to War
    Warm Springs
    7.4
    Warm Springs
    Uncovered: The McMartin Family Trials
    5.9
    Uncovered: The McMartin Family Trials
    Against the Wall
    6.6
    Against the Wall
    Dead Silence
    6.0
    Dead Silence
    Citizen Cohn
    7.0
    Citizen Cohn
    In Pursuit of Honor
    7.0
    In Pursuit of Honor
    Conspiracy
    7.6
    Conspiracy

    Storyline

    Edit

    Did you know

    Edit
    • Trivia
      James Woods filmed his role as Lester Diamond in Casino (1995) on a weekend break from shooting this film.
    • Goofs
      When the lawyer meets with Ray Buckey for the first time in jail, the door is heard slamming shut before the door actually closes.
    • Quotes

      Danny Davis: Are you kidding me with those glasses? You look like a child molester. Get rid off them or it's gonna be a short trial.

    • Crazy credits
      Epilogue:  "The McMartin family still lives in southern California.  Peggy had a nervous breakdown and continues to suffer from agoraphobia.  She lives with her mother Virginia and her son Ray.  Peggy Ann successfully sued for the restoration of her teaching credentials. She is now married and has two children.  In 1990, Lael Rubin's nomination to become a Superior Court judge was denied. She is still with the L.A. district attorney's office.  In 1992, Wayne Satz died from heart failure at the age of 47.  Kee MacFarland is still employed by Children's Institute International.   Danny Davis currently practices law in Los Angeles, as does Glenn Stevens.  Raymond Buckey is now a university student and plans to attend law school."
    • Connections
      Featured in The 47th Annual Primetime Emmy Awards (1995)

    Top picks

    Sign in to rate and Watchlist for personalized recommendations
    Sign in

    FAQ4

    • What was the background to all this?
    • What went wrong?
    • What was the outcome?

    Details

    Edit
    • Release date
      • May 20, 1995 (United States)
    • Country of origin
      • United States
    • Language
      • English
    • Also known as
      • 無盡的控訴
    • Filming locations
      • Manhattan Beach Pier - 2 Manhattan Beach Blvd, Manhattan Beach, California, USA(closing scene where the Buckey's go for a stroll with Danny Davis on the pier)
    • Production companies
      • HBO Films
      • Ixtlan
      • Abby Mann Productions
    • See more company credits at IMDbPro

    Tech specs

    Edit
    • Runtime
      2 hours 11 minutes
    • Color
      • Color
    • Sound mix
      • Dolby Digital
    • Aspect ratio
      • 1.85 : 1

    Related news

    Contribute to this page

    Suggest an edit or add missing content
    Indictment: The McMartin Trial (1995)
    Top Gap
    What is the Japanese language plot outline for Indictment: The McMartin Trial (1995)?
    Answer
    • See more gaps
    • Learn more about contributing
    Edit page

    More to explore

    Recently viewed

    Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
    Get the IMDb app
    Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
    Follow IMDb on social
    Get the IMDb app
    For Android and iOS
    Get the IMDb app
    • Help
    • Site Index
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • License IMDb Data
    • Press Room
    • Advertising
    • Jobs
    • Conditions of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, an Amazon company

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.