Stargate (1994) User Reviews

Potential!

[kersus · 8/10 · 18 May 2005]

What grabbed me about this movie was the potential it had. There was just so much that could be done with this dynamite idea. That alone made this an essential part of my movie collection.

The movie itself is quite average and while worth seeing, isn't going to knock your socks off. The acting is from adequate to good; the effects were well done and quite nicely not overdone.

So it's a fantastic idea that wasn't ruined, but isn't spectacular. The actors carry themselves well and this is a worthy addition to any sci-fi collection (especially those who like the idea of alternate history for mankind - See Alien vs. Predator).

I normally don't write such quick reviews, but this is what I felt about the movie and I think that much more would give away too much for those who haven't seen it.

An amazing story...

[back_blast · 8/10 · 12 April 2005]

Stargate is a terrific movie that has produced 2 hit TV shows, conventions and fans from all over the world. This movie started it all. I found it in my Uncle's basement and decided to watch it. It has an interesting storyline tying in Ancient Egyptian Mythology to make it even more interesting. It's about a struggling archaeologist with strange ideas about the gods and rulers of Ancient Egypt. Only one person is willing to believe him, and recruits him for a translator. What they find is even more amazing than they expected.

It's a highly underrated movie, in my opinion it's better than most sci-fi movies and very interesting.

Solid, Original Adventure Flick

[bkam · 7/10 · 12 June 2003]

Stargate's plot, acting, and score all contribute beautifully to the mysterious ambiance that is the essence of this enthralling and suspenseful film. While your disbelief definitely needs to be suspended to cover some inconsistencies, the atmosphere and action of the movie make it worth your while. Not only does Stargate combine science fiction with history, but it weaves them together in a way that remains exciting the entire film, despite major changes of environment. Upon hearing some major elements of the film, one might think that aliens, ancient Egypt, and atomic bombs could only come together in some kind of bizarre montage. However, this film is strongly plot-driven, and while this does make it typical in some respects, the plot itself is remarkable. Hardly artsy, the score is in many places Hollywood-ish, presenting emotion in a straightforward manner, yet it too is enjoyable. None of the acting is spectacular, but this is made up for by the characters' wholesome qualities and ability to change (however slightly) over the course of the movie. To summarize, while nothing in the film is a complete divergence from the standard, it follows the Hollywood style in a manner that is original enough to make a solid and enjoyable adventure. This is the actualization of the potential within the Hollywood film "template": a good story told well in all respects. [9/10]

Oh, the chicken man.

[hitchcockthelegend · 7/10 · 12 March 2009]

When scientists and historians finally figure out the meaning of an ancient Egyptian artifact, it opens a portal to another planet.

Stargate was panned by the critics on its release, no A list stars they cried, a plot line that bore a resemblance to a 1970 film called Erinnerungen an die Zukunft, and apparently caught between being an adult picture and a child friendly blockbuster. Those critics were forced to eat their words as Stargate promptly went on to be a monster smash, making $196,567,262 worldwide, and spawning a hugely popular TV series. It is for sure a no brain popcorn piece, suspension of disbelief should be at the forefront of any prospective first time viewer, but it's great fun and snazzy in all its set piece work.

Led by square jawed Kurt Russell as an on the edge Colonel, our band of merry men adventurers face peril in their new world via the weather, language barriers with the locals, oh and something a touch more sinister!. James Spader does an impressive turn as a geeky Egyptologist, on who's fate the groups survival may well rest, while Jaye Davidson serves a reminder that yes, he did act in movies many years ago. It's cliché ridden, and most of it is hacked together from far better pictures in the genres that Stargate wants to emulate, but it's damn entertaining and looks fabulous in High Definition. 7/10

Decent 90s scifi

[Calicodreamin · 7/10 · 4 May 2021]

For the 90s this is a decent scifi film, the characters were well cast and the storyline was interesting. The effects and costuming are pretty good. Russel and Spader make for unlikely duo, but they kind off work.

"Please do not leave your luggage unattended at any time, and we hope you'll have a nice intergalactic journey"

[TBJCSKCNRRQTreviews · 7/10 · 17 November 2009]

Not many people know this yet, but I'm writing the next Emmerich film. Yes. It's going to have a lead who's a dorky, socially awkward, extremely smart yet ignored scientist of some field that will relate to the plot, which will be something big, requiring a lot of costumed extras and loud special effects, and be set or deal with something fantastic that isn't that closely linked to reality. Seriously though, for using the same basic formula, his flicks tend to be fun and enjoyable escapism. Plus, this marks the possibly unique occasion of James Spader not(!) playing the role of a sexual deviant in the movie he's in. I guess he wanted to branch out. Russell, as expected, nails his part as the hardened military man who does have a heart, and in general the acting is great. The story is interesting enough, and it develops fine throughout. Pacing is good, and this does notably not overwhelm or overstimulate the audience, in spite of presenting a world that we can't directly relate to. Stephen Sommers, are you paying attention? The FX are excellent. This is exciting, entertaining and cool. The action is awesome and not excessive. As for music, this uses a broad, sweeping score, and that works well. The humor is reasonable, the jokes and gags are hit and miss. There is infrequent mild to moderately strong language and a little violence and one or two hints towards sexuality in this. I recommend this to any and all fans of those who made it, particularly Roland. 7/10

Old Fashioned ?

[Theo Robertson · 7/10 · 21 September 2004]

I first saw STARGATE about seven years ago and left with memories of thinking that it was in some way an old fashioned movie . I couldn't put my finger on why I thought this was an old fashioned movie but after seeing it again tonight I can perhaps explain it better now

STARGATE isn't so much as " old fashioned " , it's just got a rather old type of plot that's versatile . It's almost like a Tarzan movie from the 1940s where a bunch of good white guys ( In movies in those days bad guys were usually white - The good guys were always white ) team up with the king of the jungle in order to fight a bunch of evil slave traders . The story could easily be reworked with a bunch of 18th century good guys led by Errol Flynn getting shipwrecked on an island where they meet noble natives and defend them from evil pirates . Rewatching this movie again after a gap of several years I often forgot that I was watching a far fetched SF blockbuster and thought I was watching a historical drama , something that's not to be taken as a criticism . I also became aware of subtle plot points that I'd missed on first viewing . For example I thought the death of O'Neil's son was so underdeveloped that it was totally unnecessary to include this in the movie but there's a couple of scenes where it is important to the plot later on . I also knew that the movie wasn't going to be an ALIENS type of movie , something the original trailers confused me about . let's face it , a special forces team creeping about a dark pyramid . It's got be similar in tone to ALIENS . If that's what you think STARGATE is going to be about you'll be as disappointed as I was first time I saw it

Of the cast Kurt Russell and his special forces group are slightly wooden but I won't criticise the cast since these type of characters always lack flair in these genre movies . James Spader is slightly unconvincing as hero Dan Jackson due to wimpish nature and effette hairstyle ( Was Jackson conceived as a female character ? ) but Jaye Davidson is absolutely superb as Ra . This is the same Jaye Davidson from THE CRYING GAME and I was totally shocked to find this was the second and last feature film he appeared in . According to the trivia section of STARGATE it appears he's difficult to work with but someone cast him in more movies please

As for the Roland Emmerich / Dean Devlin partnership there are a few faults . One is the opening of the script that contains no hook and fools the audience into thinking they'll be watching a RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARK type movie which they won't be . The script also contains a few unlikely plot holes such as the special forces team taking some GPS equipment with them something that wouldn't work on a planet where humanity had never been , and also discovering in an unlikely scenario that they won't be able to return to Earth thanks to Jackson . There is a very interesting point to the subtext however and that is that if there is a god it doesn't necessarily mean he'll be benign or good . Food for thought . Thankfully Emmerich doesn't go overboard on the CGI while he also had the good sense ( Say it again ) to cast Jaye Davidson as Ra

By no means a classic SF movie STARGATE is solid entertainment and is rather more enjoyable on second viewing

Almost Twenty Years Later and after Watching at Least Six Times, the Timeless "Stargate" is still a Fantastic Sci-Fi

[claudio_carvalho · 9/10 · 21 September 2013]

In 1928, in Egypt, a strange device is found by an expedition. In the present days, the outcast linguist Dr. Daniel Jackson (James Spader) is invited by a mysterious woman to decipher an ancient hieroglyph in a military facility. Soon he finds that the device was developed by an advanced civilization and opens a portal to teletransport to another planet. Dr. Jackson is invited to join a military team under the command of Colonel Jonathan 'Jack' O'Neil (Kurt Russell) that will explore the new world. They find a land that recalls Egypt and humans in a primitive culture that worship and are slaves to Ra, the God of the Sun. But soon they discover the secret of the mysterious "stargate".

"Stargate" is still a fantastic sci-fi after almost twenty years and watching it at least six times. The story is intriguing and entwines action with humor and romance. The cast is excellent, with Kurt Russell and James Spade in the top of their careers. The special effects are still great after almost twenty years. And the haunting music score completes this timeless classic sci-fi with a touch of class. My vote is nine.

Title (Brazil): "Stargate - A Chave para o Futuro da Humanidade" ("Stargate – The Key for the Future of Mankind")

Note: On 18 May 2017, I saw this film again.

Good start, and then brainless and basic shoot-em-up fare

[tonyellery-44974 · 3/10 · 3 September 2020]

The movie was initially interesting and well done. Once the violence started, it turned into generic Hollywood mass shooting nonsense. A wasted opportunity, as the premise of the story was good.

A solid Sci-Fi treat

[wnterstar · 12 July 2004]

I loved this movie. It captured my attention quickly and kept it throughout the movie.

It's a great ensamble cast and the special effects add to the movie's appeal, rather than BEING the appeal.

The premise is engaging, and gives some very plausible explainations for mysteries that have stumped man for thousands of years. The bad guys are just as engagine as the good guys and that makes the movie all that much more enjoyable.

I would give this movie an 8 out of 10. It's not perfect, but good for a very enjoyable movie night!

Nice science-fiction entertainment

[AvidClimber · 7/10 · 24 June 2013]

Stargate is, as far as I'm concerned, better than the original TV series, which I've watched a couple of time without really getting interested, but then I'm not a fan.

The good. Very imaginative settings and alien technology. Beautiful photography. Nicely paced scenario. Interesting story with a solid background.

The actors. Kurt Russell is right in his element, and didn't need to show the limits of his short acting range. James Spader is the most interesting character, and plays it well. Mili Avital is pretty, innocent, and plays her sweet role really nicely. Erick Avari, though, is my favorite of the cast and offers us a very convincing performance as the primitive priest-leader faced with powerful strangers. And finally, you can see some of the antics of French Stewart.

The bad. Very low army credibility. The intro village miniature is of poor quality. The special effects are getting a bit old, but they were done in such a way as to minimize the aging and still be well received these days.

The ugly. That desert beast puppet is just terrible. The chevrons are flimsy.

The result. Good entertainment, recommended to sci-fi fans.

Respectable, Original Sci-Fi From an Unlikely Source

[drqshadow-reviews · 6/10 · 14 March 2018]

The rare Roland Emmerich film that isn't brainless, effects-over-story mayhem. Well, not completely, anyway. It does carry a lot of the director's favorite themes, from the tortured genius who only needs the chance to prove himself to the war-hungry soldier on a suicide mission, the overbearing government suits and the eccentric, ignored true believers. Those over-simplifications are glaring, of course, but at least there's an effort put in to expand certain characters beyond their stereotype (Kurt Russell's lingering resentment of guns, for example) and the plot itself is rich and interesting enough to paper over most of the holes. I've always had an affinity for science fiction and Egyptian history, so any merger of the two was bound to hit a sweet spot for me, and in this case the marriage works shockingly well. There's a certain other-worldliness about the pyramids, and that particular culture's system of beliefs, which lends itself well to such genre-driven filmmaking. The practical special effects come off wonderfully - gigantic hovering spacecraft and robotic Anubis-helmed enforcers - but it was still a bit early to rely on CG for this type of work and the few instances where they tried don't hold up very well. Despite a phoned-in leading performance by James Spader, Stargate remains a quirky, unexpectedly engaging ride. Still fresh, unique and interesting as it approaches its twenty-fifth anniversary.

The Start of an Amazing Franchise

[enterzec · 6/10 · 1 August 2017]

The movie that started the whole Stargate franchise, Stargate SG-1, Stargate Atlantis and Stargate Universe. The story is very intriguing and the whole ring concept introduced is extremely fascinating. Jack O'Neill (Kurt Russell) and Daniel Jackson (James Spader) as the two leads work really fine together. Th effects might not live up to today's standard but much better than other 90s movie and the concept and this whole idea behind the Stargate is interested and explored more deeply in the shows.

The villain Ra (Jaye Davidson) also show a lot of promise early in the movie but unfortunately he can't live up to promise and was kind of an lackluster villain in the end. The villain is of course not the center piece in this movie, that is of course the Stargate and their journey to Abydos. On Abydos they meet Skaara, Sha'uri and Kasuf, these character has to band together and fight against both time and Ra. The movie isn't fantastic by no means but it's a great starting point for the three series that continue after the movie.

Roland Emmerich is not a great director but somehow he didn't screw this one up, sure the first Independence Day is also fine but his other movies have been mediocre at best. David Arnold's score in this movie is very well done and really should be appreciated. It's not the typical sci-fi, action movie you have grown to expect over the year, but Stargate actually has a few layers to it. The whole relationship that both Jack and Daniel make with the inhabitants on Abydos is compelling and adds a lot of emotional impact to the story. Overall a really solid movie that launched the Stargate franchise.

Score: 6/10 (Solid)

www.filmtvnow.wordpress.com

Epic science fiction with its heart in the right place

[DVD_Connoisseur · 9/10 · 20 February 2007]

"Stargate"'s an exciting, high concept science fiction film from Roland ("Independence Day") Emmerich. With a capable cast, solid script and excellent set design, this is a big-budget adventure for viewers looking for pure escapist fun.

The ever reliable Kurt Russell plays the square-jawed, world weary Jack O'Neil, who is responsible for leading the military mission to another world. James Spader plays the brilliant archaeologist, Dr. Daniel Jackson. At the time, this was a different type of role for Spader and he handles the humorous content of his scenes with great success.

There's also an appearance by "The Crying Game"'s Jaye Davidson as the evil baddie, Ra. Although Davidson's role is quite small, he brings an other-worldly presence to his part.

The score by David Arnold is excellent.

A great idea for a movie, I can't help but think the concept would have made a successful television series...

CLASSIC. Without a doubt.

[darkpatriot85 · 9/10 · 25 January 2006]

Stargate is one of those great movies that hasn't got the respect it deserves. At first I thought the movie was about time travel since they go to a place that is like Ancient Egypt, which didn't really interest me at all. Then I caught an episode of the T.V. show and got curious. When I saw the movie I was blown away. The special effects were ones I had never really seen before (such as opening the Stargate for the first time). I was getting tired of seeing sci-fi movies where every alien race spoke perfect English and I thought I would experience that until the team met with the villagers which I thought was better. It's always cool to see Kurt Russel kicking ass in films. It was also different to see James Spader play the semi-nerdy guy instead of the asshole he mainly plays. I was also amazed when Roland Emmerich chose one of the simplest villains for a movie, an ancient Egyptian god. I watch this movie every week and I never get tired of it.

A Revolution In Another Part Of The Galaxy

[bkoganbing · 10/10 · 26 October 2009]

Taking a leaf from Indiana Jones where someone will one day presumably dig up the Ark Of The Covenant out of storage and see how it works, in the inscrutable ways of the Washington bureaucracy, somebody in the Defense Department has taken an interest in something called Stargate and now want to see how it works. The somebody they sent for is archaeologist/linguist James Spader who deciphers some ancient Egyptian writing and poof, the gate is upright and operational.

At that point the military takes over led by a hardnosed professional played by Kurt Russell. He's going through that gate with a team of special forces and with James Spader presumably so they can communicate with whatever life is out there.

Stargate is a teleportation device and the team travels through time and space and ends up across the galaxy on a primitive planet where the people worship a being called Ra played by Jaye Davidson. He and his much technologically advanced confederates enslave the rest of the population.

To see the changes the earth expedition makes and what the connection of this being to the Egyptian sun god Ra you will have to see this very well made and exciting science fiction film, one of the best films made during the Nineties. I saw it in theater when it first came out and seeing it again on the small screen still excites and entertains me. It's one of those films that with repeated viewing you get still another perspective.

I liked best the interplay with Kurt Russell and James Spader. Two very opposite men in temperament and in training over the course of the film gradually gain a great respect for each other. Both deliver performances that would rank in the top five for both these players.

One of the ways that Ra keeps his people subjugated is the forbidding of any of the nomadic types that are under his thumb to learn to write or even create a written language. In that culture and in every culture, literacy is the strongest weapon against tyranny. In fact one of the characters makes quite a sacrifice to secure the permanence of the revolution they've wrought on this world in another part of the galaxy that has a strange connection to our Earth.

Stargate succeeds at being both thinking person's science fiction and also has enough action and adventure to keep you to the edge of your seat, especially in the second half. It's not to be missed when broadcast, ever.

"Stargate: A Celestial Blend of Sci-Fi and Egyptological Intrigue"

[doyler79 · 6/10 · 14 January 2024]

Stargate, directed by Roland Emmerich, weaves traditional sci-fi themes with a touch of Egyptological mystique. The film kicks off with an engaging first half, highlighting James Spader's compelling portrayal of Egyptologist Daniel Jackson and the military expedition led by Kurt Russell's Colonel Jack O'Neil through an intergalactic portal.

The movie's visual effects and cinematography shine, elevating it above some genre counterparts. Kurt Russell delivers a solid performance as the no-nonsense military leader, while James Spader convincingly portrays the reluctant hero thrust into extraordinary circumstances. Jaye Davidson's silent yet commanding presence as the androgynous Ra adds an intriguing dimension to the narrative.

However, as the plot unfolds, Stargate succumbs to a familiar trope of a battle between mortal heroes and a god-like antagonist, reminiscent of other sci-fi epics. The climax feels rushed and lacks genuine suspense, diminishing the impact of the overall narrative.

Despite these shortcomings, Stargate's strengths lie in its captivating setup, Jackson's linguistic struggle, and the initial exploration of an alien world. The film successfully blends action with intelligence in its first half, even if it ultimately falls into a more formulaic showdown.

In conclusion, Stargate earns a respectable six stars for its visual spectacle, engaging first half, and commendable performances. While hindered by a somewhat clichéd plot and lackluster climax, it remains an enjoyable journey into a world where ancient Egypt meets intergalactic adventure.

#StargateAdventure.

a new classic

[chris-1876 · 25 October 2004]

Stargate the movie :- superb atmosphreric music, great special effects, excellent cast, intriguing story but - not surprised it launched a successful TV series which has run and run. I cant believe there are so called sci fi fans out there who didn't like it - must be intellectuals!!! I still enjoy the film now 1o years later although disappointed they never made a sequel as it was set up for one. Never really liked the ending - should have included the return to earth. The TV series has moved the story along nicely - even changes to the cast have worked well and i particularly enjoy the dry humour of the TV series.

Entertaining

[iwalrus · 7/10 · 26 July 2021]

An entertaining Sci-fi with plenty to keep one's attention.

The story is good but not too original.

A predictable ending.

Some good special effects and plenty of extra used in some of the scenes.

The acting was not the best but ok.

A harmless way to pass a couple of hours

[Rich-99 · 7/10 · 1 April 1999]

"Stargate" the movie is one of those Saturday afternoon adventure movies you went to as a kid. It's not Shakespeare but it is entertaining. The original release had a few gaps in the plot (why send the bomb for example) which the slightly expanded video release corrects by restoring about 10 minutes of cuts. Well photographed and good effects.

"Stargate" the tv series is another story. While the film's premise was acceptable once the visit a new world a week series strains it. Production values are also a bit tacky

I like it!

[mm-39 · 7/10 · 28 August 2002]

Interesting Science Fiction. I found the story interesting, and not too unbelievable. They find a star gate, and the military must find out what it is. I will not ruin this story, it is too good, and would be too big of a jerk for that. Russel and that other guys performances shine. Watch this one on TV. 7/10

some great ideas but the movie gets stupider and stupider as it goes along

[Aylmer · 6/10 · 21 January 2020]

This was one of the few movies I remember seeing multiple times in the theater as a teenager. Not only did it offer up a lot of fresh ideas and a lot of action, but felt pretty smart as far as big budget sci fi action movies go. Looking at it now, the film holds up fairly well through its first half, but gradually falls apart when we leave the sense of mystery it sets up at the start and into an overly familiar feeling action plot.

There's a lot I like about the film, like how instead of a big imposing and monstrous villain, they cast an actor known only for his demure femininity and gave him glowing eyes here and and a harem of children. To add even further to the creepiness, the children all seemed to honestly love their master and jumped to protect him at the slightest sign of danger, putting our heroes into possibly moral conundrums. Also it was one of the first movies to really try and make sense of ancient aliens visiting earth and their impact on ancient Egyptian culture, giving the art director here the chance to develop a truly unique alien aesthetic. We'd also barely seen the use of wormholes for space travel at the time outside of something like DUNE so it was need to see that theory given a fairly real-world application.

What doesn't work with this film? Well for one, it barely lives up to its potential by presenting us with a very half-baked alien world. Even the moons in the sky just look like superimposed images of our own moon, only with one flipped upside down. We only get to see one alien creature and the ecosystem of the planet similarly low-key as another boring desert planet. Most to the film's detriment, it just goes too fast for its own good and glazes over a lot to force in its contrived climax against enemies who make far too many idiotic decisions late in the film to generate any real tension.

Overall, STARGATE works as a window into the simpler time of the early 90's when big scifi films like this were full of wonder, spectacle, and the odd CGI effect here and there was still a novelty. Even though it was made by a different studio, the film shares a lot with WATERWORLD in that it's big, it's dumb, and it sets up a lot early on only to disappoint you by gradually descending from semi-believably sci fi into a bland action film.

Great premise, slightly flawed execution

[labcoatman · 7/10 · 26 September 1999]

Stargate's central idea isn't entirely original - aliens interfering with human culture in the past being mistaken for gods - but it is handled with finesse. Spader's Daniel Jackson is quite endearing, if a little too "movie smart," while Russell's O'Neil is an interesting, if cliched and slight, attempt to put a spin on the dedicated old soldier standard. Ra, when we finally meet him, is a sight to behold; never has such a feminine young man been so imposing.

The sets, costumes and effects perfectly capture the feel of the film; Abydos (the planet at the other end of the Stargate) might look like Egypt, but there's something about it that makes it much more distant than another continent.

The only thing which really mars the film are its occasional descents into kitsch, including one of the death scenes later in the film, reduced to silliness by careless use of extreme cliche. While these moments are, thankfully, fairly well spaced, some of the dialogue also contributes, as do a couple of plot holes.

But still, Stargate is good solid fun with a bit more thought behind it than usual, and it's a great foundation for the television series that followed - and improved - on the film.

Still entertaining after all these years...

[paul_haakonsen · 6/10 · 25 November 2021]

I remember watching the 1994 movie "Stargate" from director Roland Emmerich a couple of times back in my late teenage years, as it was a rather enjoyable movie back then. And I do remember the movie fondly back then, so as I had the chance to revisit the 1994 sci-fi movie here in 2021, of course I did so.

And yeah, "Stargate" is still watchable even now 27 years after, and the effects actually still do hold up, which is something of an accomplishment actually. So yeah, I would definitely say that "Stargate" is a movie that you can still sit down to watch and enjoy.

The storyline is straight forward, and it is the type of movie where you just grab the snacks, lean back and switch off the brain and watch the action on the screen. So writers Dean Devlin and Roland Emmerich churned out a wholesome storyline.

"Stargate" was impressive back in the day, especially because of Kurt Russell and James Spader. Sitting down to watch the movie, I noticed that the movie even had French Stewart, Djimon Hounsou and Erick Avari on the cast list, so there were some pretty fair performers on the cast list.

So if you enjoy some light Egyptian inspired themed action movie, then "Stargate" is definitely going to be a blast for you to watch.

My rating of this 1994 movie lands on a six out of ten stars.

Fairly typical

[Leofwine_draca · 5/10 · 14 December 2012]

STARGATE should be the perfect movie for me: an interesting premise, grounded in real-life theory (I've been reading Graham Hancock's FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS recently, and am familiar with Von Daniken's writings) and made with a high enough budget to do the special effects justice.

And watching it, it's hard to fault the production. The performances are pretty good, from Kurt Russell's hard-ass soldier to James Spader's nerdy Egyptologist, and the aforementioned SFX are decent. It's just that the film ends up feeling relatively mundane given the extensive set-up; it all turns into an entirely typical good guys vs. the bad guys type film, with little of the intelligence or thought-provoking questions I was hoping for.

I'll lay the blame squarely at the door of Roland Emmerich, who has quite the habit of dumbing down his source material (INDEPENDENCE DAY, GODZILLA, need I go on?). Imagine if this had been made by somebody with more interest in the questions raised instead of the size of the guns!