Amityville 1992: It's About Time (Video 1992) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
41 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
One of the better "Amityville" sequels
drownsoda9013 January 2017
"Amityville: It's About Time" follows a California architect who returns from a business trip in New York, where he acquires an antique clock. Soon after his return, he is in a terrible accident that leaves him bedridden; meanwhile, his family experiences an array of bizarre occurrences in their house. Little do they know, the clock they've brought in was from the Amityville DeFeo house, and is doing more than telling time.

I'll be frank here: none of the "Amityville" films have ever been spectacular—even the original, which, though a good haunted house film, had its flaws. The sequels have been hit and miss, and 1990's "The Amityville Curse" was abhorred by many (I actually somewhat enjoyed it, but that's another story). As the installments in this series progressed, they've tended to sprawl out to the point that each haunting is incidentally connected to the Amityville house via objects rather than geography—this occurred in Part 4 where a lamp possessed evil powers, and would be re-used again in the followup to "It's About Time" in "Amityville Dollhouse." Long story short, the series as a whole is rather silly.

With that out of the way, I do think "Amityville: It's About Time" does have some goods to offer. Where the earlier films in the series were more concerned with suspense, this sequel goes straight for thrills from the beginning, though there is a bit of character building as the film meditates on the disintegration of a family. The clock itself acts as a catalyst in the warped dynamic, and there is a lot of playful writing involving the clock's powers and its relationship toward time.

The film manages to evoke a weirdly oppressive suburban atmosphere, and the performances throughout are better than what you find in most direct-to-video fodder; Stephen Macht's role as the breadwinning architect-turned-madman is decent, and Megan Ward and Damon Martin play convincing enough teenagers. Nita Talbot is a bit of a show-stealer here as a matronly neighbor who uncovers the truth behind the family's turmoil.

Overall, "Amityville: It's About Time," though not a masterpiece by any stretch of the imagination, is one of the better "Amityville" sequels. As silly as the premise may be, there is a decent amount of fun to be had. A few memorable performances plus some appreciable special effects and playful writing render this worth a watch for genre fans. 6/10.
14 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Really good direct to video effort. Creepy concept.
insomniac_rod15 October 2006
A decent straight to video sequel to a "popular" franchise. "It's About Time" centers on a possessed clock that happens to be from the original Amytiville house. A family with intentions to renew their life, move to a beautiful mansion. Unfortunately for them, they buy the possessed clock and that's when things start to get horrible.

This is probably the second best sequel in the franchise, following "The Possession", a sinister sequel. "It's About Time" obviously centers on the possession topic and has the occasional poltergeist scenes provoked by the clock's evil glow.

This movie scared me when I first rented it (I was 8 or 9) because it has a dark, creepy atmosphere. The mansion is scary enough for a movie like this. The f/x are below average but it's normal for a direct to video sequel.

If you are a fan of haunted house or possession flicks, this is a very good option that exploits the greatness of direct to video.
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Amityville It's About Time: Weak but certainly not the worst part of the franchise
Platypuschow21 November 2017
I'm binge watching the Amityville titles I haven't seen before and am being reminded that all in all this is a poor franchise.

It's About Time otherwise known as Amityville 1992 begs the question what would happen if an item from the infamous house was relocated to another? The answer is a pretty bad movie will happen.

A man buys an antique clock that came from the Amityville house, before you know it strange things are happening and himself and other family members seem to have been possessed by something evil.

This did at least feel like an Amityville movie and reminded me a lot of Amityville: Dollhouse (1996) A passable watch for fans but as a standalone movie it's really not great.

The Good:

Amityville vibe

The Bad:

Another cheating antagonist

Pets getting killed in every damn horror film is overkill

Flawed confusing story

Things I Learnt From This Movie:

Amityville is a major contender for the most butchered franchise in movie history
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A Welcome Improvement
Muldwych6 March 2010
'It's About Time' rehashes a concept last seen in 'Amityville IV: The Evil Escapes', in that an artifact from the infamous Long Island house is relocated into the home of another family, where it soon begins to take over their lives with its demonic intentions. Hardly surprising, given that John G. Jones was the scribe for both installments.

This, I have to say, is the better attempt, and it goes a long way towards rebuilding the damage done by the painful and indeed execrable 5th film, 'The Amityville Curse'. This time around, the artifact is a clock, and its hellish influence not only possesses both the house and its occupants (naturally), but plays around with time itself, breathing at long last some new ideas into the franchise. The tension is reasonably well-paced, allowing for a gradual build until all hell breaks loose.

At the same time however, 'Amityville 1992' still suffers from a fairly silly and uneven storyline, aggravated by sloppy editing choices that prevent the overall effort from meshing together seamlessly. Add to this some rather hammy acting from veteran performers Steven Macht and Nita Talbot, along with some just plain bloody awful acting from Jonathan Penner, and it becomes difficult to take the film seriously. Thankfully the principal lead is Shawn Weatherly, who avoids the obvious temptation the script offers to go over-the-top and gives a creditable performance under the circumstances, as does Damon Martin, in what looks to be his final film.

Nonetheless, 'It's About Time' makes a far better effort to remember its roots than its two predecessors. With minimal rewrites, IV and V could very easily just be standalone horror flicks, but the plot of VI rests upon the apparently again-destroyed Amityville house's past history. On the one hand, it has no conscious ties to the DeFeo murders, but in the universe of the film franchise, these were supposed to be influenced by the house's long-present demonic incumbents, and it is here where 'It's About Time' builds its story. In the process, it grafts yet another unnecessary centuries-old European explanation for its dark history which I didn't really buy into, but I can let it slide since new ground is being explored. After all, I also have to put aside the obvious fact that if this clock has been in the house all along, why does it only manifest its powers now? Yet this is the most interesting aspect of the film, and if anything, Jones should have really let fly with the time distortion element and tried harder to pull it together into what could have been an even better and possibly mind-bending tale.

At any rate, 'It's About Time' pulls the franchise out of the mire that the previous installment dumped it into. It's still fairly silly, but a great improvement nonetheless.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Not bad for a sequel "B" Movie.
Asmodeus Night11 April 2001
The story was a little cheesy, evil clock and all… but the effects were good and it was actually somewhat scary. Don't get me wrong strictly `B' material, but definitely entertaining. Sound story, decent characters, semi believable (as supernatural events go) and even some horror and some humor.

And as for the guys: nothing here really, extremely brief sex scene at beginning not even worth mentioning, but one fairly erotic scene with the daughter and a demon controlled reflection. Good and seductive but no nudity.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Really good b horror with some dreamy scenes
bensan913 May 2019
This movie is about a clock that is haunted and evil. It messes with reality and time, cursing the people in a house.

A great soundtrack and some really memorable scenes. The actors and story keep the film from dragging. Shawn Weatherly is attractive and a good leading lady.

If the film had been a little darker and scarier that could have made it even better, but certainly a good one to grab up and add to your vhs collection.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Amityville 1992: It's About Time
HorrorFan198416 March 2020
It's certainly about time that this series had a hit, and with Amityville 1992: Its About Time, we have one!

This sixth entry ignores whatever The Amityville Curse was doing and continues the theme of the fourth film which involves cursed items from the infamous house being sold off to new owners. Here we have a possessed clock which has been purchased by the head of the family named Jacob . Once Jacob brings the clock into his house, we start to see the Amityville evil take over him and other members of his family.

Jacob gets bitten by a rabid neighbourhood dog which is when he starts to become possessed and physically dangerous to everyone around him.. After the clock kills a few people and possesses family members, it's up to Jacob's girlfriend Andrea to try and figure out what is happening and how the clock plays into how everything around her and the family is falling apart.

The acting is very well done by all. Stephen Macht and Shawn Weatherly are absolutely terrific as the dysfunctional couple. Macht has the job of playing the possessed abusive male lead and he certainly is terrifying! Shawn Weatherly as Andrea is a wonderful heroine which I rooted for to survive the entire time. Jonathan Penner provides comic relief in the later half as Andrea's side piece, trying to adapt to the craziness happening around him.

This film also gives us some really effective special effects, including a very realistic dog bite and a melting face to name a few stand out moments. It provides scares in a very fun way, some predictable stuff but entertaining nonetheless. The director likes to trick the audience numerous times in thinking that one horrific thing is happening when in fact it is not.

Amityville 1992: It's About Time is for sure my favourite sequel of the series. It provides scares, pretty decent special effects, and a story that connects this film to the original two while also making viewers entertained throughout.The evil clock has the ability to move time forward and backwards at a rapid pace which I found really well done, and it starts to control time in the home. I definitely recommend this one to any horror fan. It's a fun sequel that doesn't disappoint on the fun and cheesiness meter.

7/10
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Oh, it's about time? I always thought it was about a house
Coventry3 October 2022
For me "it was about time" as well - and urgently - to catch up on the Amityville franchise. I quit after the original first three, and never had the energy to watch any of the sequels/spin-offs released during the late 80s, 90s, and 00s. Since the makers also stopped bothering to number the sequels (always an indicator of a series outstaying its welcome), I needed the help of a horror buddy to "educate" me about the correct structure. Apparently, the three straight-to-video installments made during the 90s form an isolated trilogy that fit perfectly into the series but can nevertheless be watched separately. Good to know!

The best thing I can write about "Amityville 1992: It's about time" (apart from the fact it has an ingenious title) is that it's a more than decent and enjoyable horror tale, IF - and only if - you bear in mind it's a video-production and purely thriving on cliches, false scares, and bloodless death sequences. The script moves away from the legendary Amityville house, located in Long Island, quite nifty via a real estate agent who brings a clock from the original house to his own home. He puts it on the chimney as a niece piece of decoration, but it doesn't take long before the device starts altering time and dimension, and possess the family members of its new residence.

The mandatory "haunted house" cliches are all there: the old neighborhood lady sensing the danger, fireplaces turning themselves on and off again, the rebellious teenage son taking the blame for sinister occurrences, sweet family dogs turning vicious, etc. The importance difference, however, is that the clichés and stereotypes aren't too irritating thanks to the good pacing, adequate performances, and three or four well-timed suspense moments. The beautiful Shawn Weatherly is a terrific leading lady, and horror fanatics will appreciate the cool guest appearances by Nita Talbot ("Frightmare", "Chained Heat") and Dick Miller ("I Bury the Living", "The Howling"). The ending is a letdown, but then again, typically 90s.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
About as good as 3-D
Cole_Early7 July 2007
This one is probably one of the better sequels, and though it doesn't really live up to the classic standards, it sure packs a punch.

Unlike the fourth and seventh and eighth sequels, this one delivers far more suspense, though a lot of it is typical and expected, such as the declining sanity of the buyer of anything related to Amityville. But it's well-done/well-put-together, and the idea of an Amityville-possessed clock is far more ominous than a stupid lamp, mirror, or a doll-house, you've got to admit.

It even has some real gore thrown in there... what a surprise... Also, this is the first Amityville that really relies on lies, cons and deceits of people and how things like that can tear families and attachments into shreds.

It's a decent sequel, I suppose.
15 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
won't make for high brow film discussion, but silly fun nonetheless
boy_in_red2 September 2006
Okay I admit it. The Amityville movies are definitely one of my guilty pleasures in life- but hey everyone has a vice right? I just genuinely get excited before I'm about to see another, and so far (with the exception of the incoherent snooze-fest that is Amityville 3/ 3-D) they've all been pretty entertaining.

So they aren't highly polished works of art, the standard of acting is variable to say the least, and the series did very quickly descend to made for TV/ straight to video territory. But I find the films to be a lot of fun, and considering the sheer number of sequels (seven and a remake to date) for the most part each film does manage to bring something new to the series, and considering the original concept of a haunted house doesn't lend much in the way of creative flexibility, it has been fun to watch the different ways in which the subject matter is approached.

Amityville 1992 : It's About Time (or simply Amityville: It's About Time as it is known on DVD) continues the theme of items from the original Amityville house ending up in new households, only to wreak havoc, as introduced in Amityville: The Evil Escapes. In this case it is an antique clock, which the audience will discover has a history of its own. However, rather than go for the obvious "and then things get thrown around the house and the walls bleed route" the writers have decided to play with the theme of time- we see glimpses of the past, time slows down and speeds up, and events are undone. Yes the premise of course is ultimately silly- time warps don't fit comfortably with Amityville lore, but it does make for a nice twist in the saga.

I liked the fact that characters were flawed also- our heroine Lisa (played convincingly by Megan Ward is introduced to us as a woman who is cheating on her psychiatrist boyfriend with an ex she knows she shouldn't get involved with/ Okay it's not groundbreaking stuff, but for the genre of horror it's a nice move away from the virginal stereotypical protagonist. In many other horror films she wouldn't be the female lead, she'd be the prime victim.

Expect some unintentionally hilarious dialogue, one of the charms of the Amityville horror movies, and look out for an interesting death scene which reminds me of the Final Destination films- you think you've escaped death by oh no you haven't. In fact it's delivered with (I hope) a real tongue in cheek sense of humour- you'll know what I mean when you see how the poor character is finished off! So to summarise- silly fun that's certainly worth renting. If you've seen the other sequels you'll know what to expect- it won't make for high brow film discussion, but it'll entertain for a couple of hours, and make you laugh a couple of times too.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
An Improvement Over the Previous Two Films in the Franchise
Uriah4329 August 2023
This film begins with a man by the name of "Jacob Sterling" (Stephen Macht) returning from Long Island, New York to his home in Burlwood, California. When he gets home, he is greeted by his former girlfriend "Andrea Livingston" (Shawn Weatherly) who he had asked to stay there to look after his two teenaged children "Lisa Sterling" (Megan Ward) and "Rusty Sterling" (Damon Martin). That said, immediately after being greeted by them as well, he then produces an ancient clock he bought in New York that came from a burned-out house in Amityville. Not long after that, strange paranormal events begin to happen which include rifts in both space and time, hallucinations and severe personality changes in Jacob--and then things begin to get even worse. Now, rather than reveal any more, I will just say that I found this movie to be a definite improvement over the last two films in the franchise--as this one was much more imaginative. Likewise, I also liked the performance of Shawn Weatherly who practically carried the film all by herself with her beauty and charm. Be that as it may, while I would admit that this movie isn't the best horror film in the series and that it could have used a bit more suspense here and there, it seemed to pass the time fairly well and I have rated it accordingly. Average.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Better Than Some of the Sequels
Michael_Elliott14 April 2012
Amityville 1992: It's About Time (1992)

** (out of 4)

Jacob Sterling (Stephen Macht) returns from a business trip in NY and has an antique clock with him. It turns out that this clock has a bad history including being present in the infamous Amityville house. Soon all sorts of bad things are going on so Jacob's son (Damon Martin) and girlfriend (Shawn Weatherly) must try and destroy the clock. This here was the sixth film in THE AMITYVILLE HORROR series and it was one (of many) that went direct-to-VHS back in the day. I think what really hurts this film's reputation is the "Amityville" title because I'm sure there are fans of the original three movies (why I don't know) who come to this cheap horror film and are disappointed that it's really not connected. Like HALLOWEEN III, if this film was released on its own and not part of a series then perhaps it would be enjoyed more. With that said, no one should mistake this for a good movie because it's not. However, it's still better than your typical low-budget film. The story itself isn't the greatest in the world but I think there are enough interesting ideas to where you can stay entertained. The film also benefits from some pretty good special effects and you're going to be shocked at how good they are compared to most movies like this. We get a rather vicious dog attack that looks quite real and the leftover impact of the attack is on full display throughout the rest of the movie as the wounds continue to ooze blood and other stuff. There are also a few other creative death scenes but one is without question really bad and I'm not going to spoil it but it's something that happens after an almost death by car. You won't miss the scene. The performances are also better than normal with Weatherly really coming across good as the girlfriend. AMITYVILLE 1992: IT'S ABOUT TIME shouldn't be looked at as a masterpiece or any sort of good cinema but it's certainly much better than most films in the series.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Probably won't be your new all time favorite
Finfrosk862 June 2015
I read this in depth review of all the Amityville Horror movies, and it said that this was one of the very best. It also said that most of them were very bad. After I saw this I understand that the others must be horrible. Because this is not very good.

The plot is strange, and in the end I'm not really sure I understood what had happened at all. Hah, weird.

It is not scary. Not hugely entertaining, just OK. Which is why my score is 5. In the middle. OK. Meh. It has got some charm here and there, a little humor, but honestly not much sticks out.

I am very fascinated by horror movie series, with countless sequels, it's just interesting to see how they develop. Unfortunately, this movie series is pretty darn boring. And every movie has less to do with the Amityville-house than the last.

I do really like the remake with Ryan Reynolds, though. That one is pretty solid. And the original is OK.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
An reasonable horror film
pickeringmark-1768729 December 2020
It's a not bad movie it has some exciting moments and it can be a bit boring in some places at times but on the whole it's worth watching especially if you are a fan of the amityville series
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Its about time this series died
boo_4ever2 April 2005
1992 : Its About Time - and it concerns a clock. Do you see? Its clever. In a way.

What wasn't clever was basing a whole film around it. This has to be the worst film ever. Name one bad film and I guarantee you this is worse. Except maybe Halloween 3. I sometimes have nightmares about being battered to death by the extra heavy deluxe editions of these two movies tag teaming me until I'm a bloody pulp.

The film concerns a clock / lamp ....thing which was removed from the Amityville house. But , get this, its possessed! As was the toaster, the oven mitts, and the TV remote. Fortunetly for their new owners they were successfully exorcised. Unfortunately for us we have to watch the evil lampstand kill people in the attic.

This comment was meant as a warning not to watch this film or your DVD player will literally be possessed by an evil you wish you never borough into your house.
3 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Best of the sequels
zitajohann22 February 2022
I just watched all the amityvilles up to the 2005 remake had seen some but most were first time views. This one stood out along with part 2 as the most interesting and some really cool fx.

If you want an entertaining B horror movie this is a good one.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
tick-tock; time is messed up
ryangilmer0075 March 1999
I like the story. I like the little tid-bits about a 13th century French necromancer (who later came to the famed Amityville house through an antique clock he owned). I even like the "it's about time" quote tie in to the title. BUT this movie just doesn't quite work right. Some images are cool (like how an old French room appears from flicking a lite-swith), but others are horrid (like oil dripping out of a bath-tub and a hand reaching up). some of this is to be expected, after all this is horror, but ...ugh... the ending is the beginnning all over again (like a Groundhog-Day meets Event Horizon and one time though is enough). And just trying to fathom why the clock would turn back to that time (1992 beginning of the story) is ridiculous. Why not go all the way back to 1979 and the original movie and/or story. Now that would have been something. Instead of the current house only being the Amityville house in visions and flashes it could have been the actual original house. And another thing, why Amityville 1992 (the year is not mentioned on the screen, so why not "it's Amityville time" or something less hokey, but more timeless? I don't know it's just kind -of-messed up.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Deserves more credit than it gets...
Triple717 December 1999
Amityville 1992 is unfortunally "not liked" and many people would agree, but I think this movie is good, entertaining, and scary. It's not that original (Basically all amityville movies steal ideas from each other) but can give some good frights. Cheesy...? Maybe. Bad acting...? Probably. This film still deserves more credit than it gets and is better than most of the other Amityville movies. You'll love it or you'll hate or you'll just say: "Well that was interesting... Well, lets watch something now!" The makers of Hellraiser 2 were involved in the production.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Nothing impressive here...
paul_haakonsen8 August 2022
Well, with the "Amityville" movie franchise getting worse and worse with each passing movie, I have to say that I wasn't particularly thrilled about watching the 1992 movie "Amityville: It's About Time" from writers Christopher DeFaria and Antonio Toro. Yet, I opted to sit down and watch it, as I hadn't already seen it, and I had the opportunity to do so.

The storyline in "Amityville: It's About Time" left me with an overwhelming sensation of 'why?'. The iconic house wasn't even the focal point of this 1992 addition to the franchise. And the storyline was just sort of generic and rather pointless really. So I wasn't particularly entertained by director Tony Randel's 1992 movie.

Where in one of the previous movies it was a lamp that served as a focal point of the storyline, "Amityville: It's About Time" has a clock. Yeah, so much for originality.

It should be noted that the acting performances in "Amityville: It's About Time" were actually fair enough, especially when taking into consideration the severe limitations imposed on the cast from having very little to work with from a subpar script and storyline.

Visually then there wasn't anything spectacular about "Amityville: It's About Time". It was a pretty forgettable movie really. And as for the horror aspect of "Amityville: It's About Time", nay, it just simply wasn't there.

My rating of "Amityville: It's About Time" lands on a generous three out of ten stars.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bog-standard horror in the most bog-standard of houses
King_Opossum3 May 2000
Being number six in a long line of AMITYVILLE sequels, AMITYVILLE 1992 (well it seems like it could actually be!) was never really going to be any good. Supernatural horror sequels never really seem to work, no matter how much of a classic the originals were. Look how the OMEN series depleted rapidly in quality, gasp as Freddie Kreuger becomes less of the ultimate evil and more like that old geography teacher that everyone used to play up to - vomit as the EXORCIST franchise went from classic to jurassic... Number six just doesn't sound good!

And IT'S ABOUT TIME really doesn't do anything to argue this matter. Some nice ideas are here, don't get me wrong, but the film just lollops along with a pace that starts to feel like time is stopping altogether! The only gratification I got (and the only reason why I held out) was the wonderful scene where the lovely Megan Ward experiences her 'para-sexual' awakening. Great cinema - I can't really complain!

So make of this review what you will - AMITYVILLE is not nearly as bad as some from this genre, and it is not entirely unenjoyable. Just plan something else to do at the same time - this film requires only a fraction of your attention (about 10 minutes halfway through actually!), so your brain might start to drum its bio-rythmical thumbs...
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
It's About Time, That's What!
utgard1425 December 2013
Another straight-to-video sequel in the terrible Amityville franchise. This one is about an architect (Stephen Macht) who brings home a clock that was in the Amityville house. Little does he know it's haunted! Ridiculous on every level. This crapper is probably best known today (if it's known at all) for featuring Jonathan Penner of Suvivor fame in an early acting role. It's pretty much pure garbage. I was sad to see veteran actress Nita Talbot in this. Gotta pay the bills I guess. Most hilarious scene is probably where the daughter's boyfriend melts. Also liked how they managed to fit the title of the movie into the dialogue in a way I'm sure some hack screenwriter thought was clever.
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
It's about time they put this dog to sleep!
Captain_Couth4 June 2004
Amityville 1992 (1992) was an improvement over the made for television movie that has a similar plot. But they're both stinkers. If it looks like a dog and smells like a dog, it's a dog no matter how much you try and dress it up or use different lighting or heavy amounts of perfume or deodorant. It'll still stink. This movie is a needless waste of one's energy. The movies now are not even about the house anymore (wasn't that the point?). Now family heirlooms and other objects are becoming "evil". What's the point of making another film? The producers thought that by making a cheap direct for video movie that they would make a few bucks? I bet they lost their shirts on this one. Sadly, several more of these films have managed to hit the video shelves. What's next, a haunted crock pot or broom from the Amityville House?

Don't waste your time. Life is too precious to watch movies that'll give you instant cataracts.
2 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
You'll wish Megan Ward was your sister.
milkhole21316 November 2022
The sixth Amityville film from the original series is surprisingly one of the best. This continues the cursed object part of the series and is like part 4 set in sunny California. The lack of the dreary New England/Canadian locals of earlier entries is detrimental to the atmosphere but this entry more than makes up for it in the pure fun factor while adding a decent amount of gruesomeness. The original house is of course absent though it does make a couple of "minor" guest appearances. The cursed object here is a clock brought home by an widowed architect who has two teen children. This brings a new and interesting element to the film of time being slowed down or stopped by the cursed clock.

The pretty Shawn Weatherly who you've hopefully seen in the cult classic Shadowzone plays the architect's ex-girlfriend who has been watching his kids. Early on there's a sweaty sex scene between the two which doesn't feature nearly enough female nudity. A grunting, sweaty Stephen Macht isn't a pretty sight as he looks like he would be a runner up in a Rondo Hattan look-a-like contest with Ron Unz winning first place. The Easter Islanders could have modeled their giant stone heads after one of his ancestors. The clock slowly influences members of the household as they start to change drastically and lose touch with reality. Even the dog goes nuts, attacking Stephen and leaving him with a nasty leg wound. The wound effects are very well done and gets nastier and more infected looking as the movie progresses eventually ending up looking like a body horror grotesquerie.

Other characters here are a psychiatrist who is annoying and has a love affair with Shawn. He's easily the least interesting part of the film. Nina Talbot plays a seemingly crazy old lady who knows the history of the clock. She looks like she could be Meg Foster's grandmother. The clock belonged to medieval child murdered Gilles de Rais who I think I first learnt about from a Brodequin song. The son is the rebellious type. A one point he's accused of painting a Swastika on a neighbor's garage. This causes a full-scale police investigation which is almost a big a waste of resources as assigning dozens of FBI agents to investigate a garage door pull. In the real world every single one of these vandal "hate crimes" turns out to have been done by one of the people it's supposedly targeting. As some have said the supply of "White supremacy" is greatly exceeded by the demand. See the most recent example of an artist in Chicago using noose flyers to get publicity for her "art". If a simple piece of rope can halt the construction of the unnecessary center for one of the worst and ugliest presidents in history I would encourage people of all races to hang them. The last and best cast member is the daughter played by the adorably sexy Megan Ward. The malign influence of the house turns her from innocent to a sex-pot. At one point she's molested by her mirror image. I'm not sure if that counts as incest or just masturbation, either way it's pretty hot.

There's lots of black goo in the film making one think Armus might be invading the house. While not especially gory this still manages to be more gruesome than most entries. There's a severed dog head in a bucket and the old lady is impaled by a bird statue on top of an ice cream truck. Megan Ward uses her seductive little body to lure her boyfriend into a trap. He's sucked into a pile of goo at the house and briefly looks like that talking pizza from House IV which also came out in 1992. Eventually things start going really crazy with both Stephen and Megan really losing it. She tries to seduce her brother in a scene that will make fans of the superior second film very happy. Stephen's leg wound has gotten really nasty looking and Shawn ends up stabbing him with one of those annoying architect's tools that they use to show off and look cool in a very painful looking gore shot. There's some really bad special effects (the only fake ones in the movie) and a couple of twists to end it.

Amityville 1992: It's About Time is a superior entry in the original series and is surely better than anything made recently exploiting the series' limited name value (except for maybe Amityville Vibrator). It feels much livelier than the slow, plodding 3-5 films and has some fun gruesome effects work. The cast is much better than the 5th film. The yummy Megan Ward stands out as the seductive sister/daughter and brings back incest to the series, the brother/sister subplot being the most beloved part of the second film. Evil curses that make people horny are much more interesting than ones that merely make them murderous. This also does a decent job of combining "fun" scares with some actually tense and scary ones. While it's in no way a horror/comedy it does have enough lighter moments to keep it from being as stuffy as previous entries. If the dull part 4 and the slow but passable part 5 made you turn against this series watch this one and you'll realize it still has fun to offer.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
My lab rat.
harrisoncall19 February 2000
I watched Amityville: It's about Time as an experiment. I wanted to see if I could predict the timing of the nude scene; the lousy movies HBO showed at 3am back then usually put the breasts on the screen at 10 minutes, 30 minutes, 60 minutes or ninety minutes (more often if Shannon Tweed was in the flick). I figured that, since this was a horror picture, any the breasts would march in early and chose 10 minutes. My precision in this case was eerie. Unfortunately, that was the only thing that was eerie about this dull entry in a series that was played out before the first movie premiered.
2 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
"Pure evil".
lost-in-limbo17 August 2013
After the abysmally dour filth instalment "The Amityville Curse", the sixth outing "It's about time" was a step in the right direction. Not perfect, but at least far from boring. Like the fourth film which had a cursed lamp (yep you're reading that right), this one too sets the curse in another household in another town, but the instrument used here is an antique clock that is purchased in Amityville. It unleashes a dark supernatural force that begins to control the family, as they start turning on each other and acting out of character. Directed by Tony Randel ("Hellraiser II: Hellbound" & "Ticks"), the straight-to-video "It's about time" is a nasty little horror film concentrating more so on its vivid special effects and grisly jolts then building anything in the way of suspense. Some of the imagery is atmospherically staged, while the ghastly make-up effects (outside of the black goo) had me thinking of "Hellraiser". Even throw in a touch of incest. The performances hold up well enough. Strong turns by Stephen Macht and Shawn Weatherly with the likes of Megan Ward and Nita Talbot rounding it off. Also Dick Millar makes a cameo. The concept had creative touches, however the story mechanics are quite fundamental, but at times it can go over-the- top and be very hysterical in its silly outbursts. Too bad I find the payoff to be weak.

"It's about time".
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed