Ricochet (1991) Poster

(1991)

User Reviews

Review this title
71 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Starts well but then goes downhill
AlsExGal6 May 2017
A rookie cop becomes a media sensation after a video camera captures him shooting and capturing a psycho killer. The handsome, smooth talking cop becomes a celebrated district attorney and even potential political candidate. He now has a beautiful wife and two great kids.

Meanwhile the psycho killer follows his career from prison, seething with hatred, eventually to make a bloody break from prison, fake his own death, then begin a systematic attempt to ruin the D.A.'s life by a series of incidents in which people, including his own wife, will question his sanity. The D.A. will soon be on the run from the law, having to team with old street gang members in order to clear himself.

Denzel Washington is the cop/D.A. and John Lithgow, incredibly, the psycho killer who seemingly can't be stopped. Lithgow even has a mortal combat sequence with Jesse "The Body" Ventura in which he is the quite easy victor. Really? Lithgow besting Ventura mano a mano? Ice T plays the chief gang member.

This film starts well enough but becomes increasingly over the top as it proceeds and then, well, just plain dumb. Action fans who just want to go on a free wheeling ride and don't care about logic may enjoy it while others may be turned off by a film that becomes pretty hysterical in its presentation, particularly the climax with television cameras there to record all the action.

In the prison Lithgow has a cell wall covered with photos of Washington, a reflection of his clear obsession with him. But prison authorities don't seem to care. What kind of prison is this? His combat scene with Ventura, with all inmates cheering them on, continues for three or four minutes. No prison guards around to stop them? What kind of prison is this? When a prison break is made power tools are used as weapons, including a power saw for one spectacular way for a uniformed guard to die. What kind of prison is this? Washington's power as an actor comes through sporadically but he can't make the material seem any better. There are a couple of scenes in which he is stripped down to show how semi beef cakey he was at the time. There is also a moment, to show what kind of film Ricochet is, in which one character has a spectacular fall, landing on a spike which rips through his body.

Washington's deadpan response, "You get the point now, don't you?" It's a cheap jokey cringe worthy moment, reminiscent of Sean Connery's 007.
17 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Outlandish cop thriller...
moonspinner5529 May 2006
Over-the-top vehicle for Denzel Washington, here playing policeman-turned-District Attorney who puts slimy killer John Lithgow away, but quickly becomes the psycho's main target after Lithgow escapes from prison (in what must be the most nondescript prison-breakout in movie history!). Ridiculous, sometimes enjoyable non-think entertainment doesn't take itself too seriously, and Washington is solid throughout. Lithgow appropriately hams it up, but Lindsay Wagner is wasted as a fellow D.A. Film tails off near the finish line for a formulaic climax, but otherwise isn't too bad. ** from ****
17 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
On The Bounce
robinski342 August 2013
A strong opening sequence, reminiscent of titles straight from a Hitchcock movie, bodes well and it's Denzel to the max from the opening frames. 'Ricochet' is very much a product of the 80's in its look and sound, and there's a hard edge and some snappy dialog that really pushes the action forward without pulling any of its numerous punches. This is most likely down to the screenplay being penned by Steven de Souza who wrote Die Hard; DH 2; 48 Hours and Another 48 Hours, some of the previous decades' defining films. John Lithgow's performance is suitably deranged, Kevin Pollack provides solid support (nice impression in the early stages). It's a good story, not without a Hitchcockian twist or two, arguably not particularly polished as a final product, but still a barrel load of kitschy '80's fun. Worth a look, especially for Denzel fans.
11 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Washington and Lithgow work well as enemies
view_and_review23 August 2018
Early in the movie there was a discourse between Nick Styles (Denzel Washington) and Odessa (Ice-T) that was a prelude to Denzel Washington in his Oscar role in Training Day. Seeing that was very exciting. Now, unfortunately, the rest of the movie wouldn't be on the level of Training Day but it was still good.

Earl Talbot Blake (John Lithgow) was put behind bars in 1984 by Officer Nick Styles. From that day until Blake was able to secure his release in 1991 he'd been planning his revenge. The revenge was well coordinated and pretty much flawless. A little too flawless.

I appreciated Blake's commitment, preparation, and execution. It was a creative plan he authored to not simply kill Styles, but to destroy his life. But the plan was so grandiose and so elaborate that it defied all reason and feasibility. As I've mentioned in other reviews: elaborate plans that rely on so many moving parts and rely upon predicting the precise actions of another human being are just too far-fetched and unrealistic for me to swallow.

Still, even with that aspect and flaw I thought the movie was good. It offered action, a decent plot, and of course good acting from Washington and Lithgow. Washington was the suave, upwardly mobile cop turned DA while Lithgow was the seething psychopathic megalomaniac with a burning desire to destroy his enemy. They were an excellent mesh.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Jesus Christ ! Almost.
hitchcockthelegend4 March 2008
Nick Styles is a cool cop who whilst on the beat with his partner captures and embarrasses on live TV, ruthless crime maniac Earl Talbott Blake. Styles goes on to achieve fame and lands the job of Assistant District Attorney, whilst Blake is sent to prison from where he plots a mission from hell that will destroy Styles life wholesale.

Whilst not amounting to more than your standard revenge thriller, Ricochet does have grizzly devilment within its plot to make this a recommend for those who enjoy the popcorn thriller. John Lithgow is always great as a loon bad guy, and here he is a cackling grinning maniacal maelstrom of hate, and some of the lines he gets to deliver are icy madness personified. Denzel Washington is routinely good as Styles, handsome and believable as the cop done good who gets his life flipped upside down by the revenge thirsty Blake. The film is tight on action (including a couple of gross scenes for those inclined), no little suspense, and a wonderful homage to White Heat into the bargain.

It's no award winner, it's for those who like to be entertained with a bowl of no brain popcorn on their laps. See this if you enjoyed Lithgow in Cliffhanger, or purely if you like Washington period. 7/10
12 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Man, what a whacked-out psycho thriller
Mr-Fusion29 September 2015
"Ricochet" is a movie worth seeing (renting) for its two lead actors; both of whom approach this movie with gusto, not to mention serious talent: Denzel as the righteous crusader attorney, and Lithgow as the bat-guano crazy killer. Lithgow plays the hell out of the psycho here, not the scenery-chewing bad guy you picture from "Cliffhanger", but the unhinged and unpredictable kind. The mindscrew he puts Denzel through in this movie is something else, man. Way out there.

Sleazy and over-the-top are both very good descriptors for "Ricochet", which isn't at all what I'd expected. It does have that early '90s violence (you know it when you see it), but a lot of it's shot like a music video; it's kinda surreal. Ice Ti's character/subplot is awkwardly shoved in there, but on the other hand, Kevin Pollack's a reliable presence. I do love that Mary Ellen Trainor's playing the same character she did in "Die Hard") it's so random). This holds your attention, but it's also fairly forgettable.

6/10
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
awesome
mattkratz12 March 2001
This movie rocks! The double cat-and-mouse game played by Washington and Lithgow works. If you are looking for an action movie that provides plenty of thrills, conflicts, drama, chases, and breathtaking suspenses and actually has a PLOT, then this film is for you.

Washington and Lithgow are both first rate, as always, and this movie does not disappoint. Watch it!

*** out of ****
23 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Action Picture Fizzles Upon Impact **1/2
edwagreen12 March 2006
Denzel Washington, a policeman in law-school is playing basketball with the neighborhood toughs.

He achieves fame by bringing down a drug dealing character, played extremely well by John Lithgow, who by his acting of a psychopath, put a new dimension into his acting abilities.

Washington has it made as the years pass. Lithgow plots revenge while incarcerated and breaks out violently at his parole hearing.

He turns the tables on Washington in several ways including the killing of his friend and fellow officer, nice played by Kevin Pollak. Washington is blamed for the killing. He kidnaps Denzel and shoots drugs into his system and provides him with a prostitute.

The two eventually tangle on top of a high area before the obvious ending occurs.

A good story allowed to go awry by crazy staged events.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
One of the Most Ridiculous Movies I've Seen
kendallwi21 October 2020
It's so bad, it's good? I don't even know how to explain the absurdity going on in this movie. From the power guy/bad guy having cake with the babysitter to everyone believing a dubbed video of the protagonist passed out screwing a hooker is real. Everyone close to him IMMEDIATELY turning on him for absolutely no reason whatsoever to god knows what because I haven't even finished this train wreck. I don't know if someone really wrote the most terrible script in the world or half this movie got left on the editing room floor. God it's bad.
15 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
cliché-ridden spectacle
browndc-13 May 2007
This movie gets worse with every passing minute. I was really excited to see John Lithgow playing a villain, and some guy named Denzel was in it too. The main problem with this film is that it tries too hard to establish Denzel as good and Lithgow as evil, and both end up as simply unlikeable characters.

Lithgow is so evil that there's nothing to sympathize with. He kills without remorse, gets in with the Aryan brotherhood, and while diabolical, he isn't even that smart. His plots are simplistic, and only work because everyone else is pretty dense too.

Washington is so good that there's nothing to sympathize with. His only flaw is a righteous cockiness, which he earns by having never done anything wrong in his life. Normally, when we see this sort of character in a movie, at some point he has to make a choice between the lesser of two evils and do something commonly perceived as "wrong." Not the case here. Any "wrong" he does is beyond his control.

As for the ending, you've seen it a million times in different movies. So don't hold your breath.
10 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Typical Washington Fare, Which Means Interesting
ccthemovieman-124 May 2006
This is a typical Denzel Washington film: well-acted, rough language, a racial theme and an involved story that holds your interest. A lot of his movies fit those categories.

Washington plays a preacher's kid and its nice to see he has such respect for him.So many times, Hollywood portrays fathers and especially clergymen in a bad light. John Lithgow is the villain and is such a crazy over-the-top loon he's fun to watch. There are no lulls in this story, yet the action scenes weren't overdone.

It gets predictable in the end but I like the analogy in the film to the classic movie, "White Heat."

I was sorry to see a few things: once again, white people are all the bigots; Lindsay Wagner, television's nice lady of the past, now using very profane language here and looking hard.

Overall, this sometimes looks like a "B" action film more than a classy one but it's still an interesting crime film that sports a few different angles. It may not be one of Washington's better-known efforts, \but it is still entertaining.
40 out of 55 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Enjoyable Action Thriller
slightlymad2216 August 2023
Continuing my plan to watch every movie in Denzel Washington's filmography I come to 1991's Ricochet.

I have been looking forward to this one. I have not seen it since it was released and I really remember liking it.

This is a lot darker and more violent than I remember. Directed by Russell Mulcahy (there is a sword scene that seems right out of Highlander) it's a good watch. Although I found the ending a but lame.

It's well-acted by a talented cast. Mary Ellen Trainor played reporter Gail Wallens, the same character she played in Die Hard. Another prominent actor from the Die Hard franchise, John Amos has a small role, but he isn't playing the same character.

Ricochet grossed less than $22 million at the box office and was the 62nd highest grossing movie of 1991.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Denzel, must you?
tricksixxx30 January 2006
This is just one of those average Die Hard spin offs that in most cases I try to avoid. John Lithgow is pretty convincing as a stark raving mad inmate, but to many aspects of this movie fall flat on its face. Some of this stuff is just to far fetched for me to buy into. Do men in prison really dress themselves up in ghetto armor and masquerade around the lunch hall with swords and battle to the death? Do juries really buy into bashing the defense attorney personally, and do they allow DAs to jump around the courtroom waving his hands in the air like a madman and screaming like a girl? Is it possible to goto a parole hearing, tell a man on the parole board you are going to have sex with his wife and his daughter AND HIS DOG, and then have 3 prisoners just magically bust up in there with power drills and electric saws (with no plug-in around) and kill everybody, then make an escape on a van filled with books for sale? I mean cmon when do you want me to stop? I am able to suspend disbelief for a film in many cases, but then there is this fine line between entertaining and just plain ridiculous. The only reason this movie gets a 4 is because the acting was exceptional. Btw, drug me up on heroin and cocaine and I bet you still can't convince me to have sex with someone I don't want to, even if she is a white hooker with CLAP. 4/10
15 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Mindless DW action thriller
When the name Russell Mulcahy is brought up for movies, fans will remember him for two well-known properties. The one fans will most fondly remember is Mulcahy's first entry in movies, that being Highlander (1986). The other widely recognized character that Mulcahy made a movie on was in The Shadow (1994). Of course in between those was Mulcahy's biggest blunder which was Highlander II: The Quickening (1991). That same year though Mulcahy also directed this movie featuring a different up and coming star. A young Denzel Washington was making his way through movies leaving a generally memorable impression on the characters he took on. At the time, the last big film that Washington got people's attention in was Glory (1989). He wasn't a lead, but his supporting role still played a very big part to the story.

The plot here is about Nick Styles (Denzel Washington), a cop who sky rockets to a high promotion after foiling the plans of Earl Talbot Blake (John Lithgow). Upon this moment, Blake makes it his mission to ruin the life Styles built for himself after he breaks out of prison. When he does, Styles is already the district attorney and has a wife Alice (Victoria Dillard) and kids. The original story was written by Menno Meyjes from The Color Purple (1985), Empire of the Sun (1987), Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade (1989) and Fred Dekker of House (1985) and Night of the Creeps (1986) fame. The screenplay was then adapted by Steven E. De Souza who wrote for Commando (1985), The Running Man (1987) and Die Hard (1988). Together, these individuals produce a very mindless action thriller. There is entertainment value to be had, it's just not a story that is game changer in the genre.

A lot of what makes this viewing experience a fluff show are a few things. One thing is that there are moments that are meant to be lighthearted. The dialog just makes it sound like it's trying to be a buddy cop movie. Even though Styles' partner Larry (Kevin Pollak) isn't the funniest if the laughter is relying on him alone. Some of the lines Blake says are also typical villain-esque, like "you're fired". There's also the issue with proof blindly being disregarded by people that any sane person could have figured out. It's like when there's an obvious change to something that's clear as day and yet no one can see that change. It looks stupid that anyone could fall for such an obvious callout. Then there's just the unrealistic events that happen in various spots. Two guys sabre fight in the middle of jail mess hall. Okay...who gave the inmates the approval to do that? It's things that take place such as this that question how much in the real world would this happen.

Apparently there is some valid connections to it though. Actress Mary Ellen Trainor plays a new reporter by the name of Gail Wallens. She also played that same character in Diehard (1988),...so a Diehard expanded universe? Strange; guess de Souza was kind of thinking for the long term? Aside from these flaws there are still good parts to the feature. All the actors provide what they can. Denzel Washington is still that likeable protagonist very few if anyone would want to see harmed. John Lithgow as Blake is a decent villain. He certainly can make his presence known and definitely shows no mercy for whoever he has in his sites. Lithgow would later play Lord Farquaad in Shrek (2001). There are appearances from other actors like Ice-T, Lindsay Wagner, John Amos, John Cothran, Lydell M. Cheshier, Sherman Howard also known as Bub from the original Day of the Dead (1985) and even Jessie Ventura.

The action and violence on scene is not abundant but when it's there, the viewer won't miss it. Some of it is actually pretty gruesome which is why it clashes with the comedy bits. It's not a dark comedy. The camerawork fits well with in the picture though. Shot by Peter Levy who worked on A Nightmare on Elm Street 5: The Dream Child (1989) and Predator 2 (1990), the shots are correctly taken with no real issues. For the film score, Alan Silvestri took the job of composing the music. While the album for it contains only a third of the entire run time, the tracks work to the films credit. Several of the cues have similar sounds to that of prior works like Who Framed Roger Rabbit (1988). There are lots of horn blasts and timpani rumbles. Not the strongest composition but still a fun listen.

Premise wise the story is fine, but the details within it, tone of certain scenes and hyper violent action makes this more of a fluff piece. Maybe consider it Diehard (1988)-lite since it's in the same universe? It has good acting, action, camerawork and music.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Little Old But Super Solid
damianphelps22 November 2023
Ricochet is a punchy action thriller that teams up Denzel Washington and John Lithgow.

The Denzel's performance as a cop/lawyer ensnared in a high-stakes game is a standout, complemented by Lithgow's portrayal.

The film keeps putting nails into the coffin of The Denzel as Lithgow tightens the screws (I know I changed equipment!).

Ricochet is a fun journey of suspense, featuring well-executed twists that keep viewers on their toes.

The pacing strikes a harmonious balance, ensuring a dynamic mix of heart-pounding moments and character development.

Ricochet isn't your ordinary action film; it's a standout entry in the crime genre. If you're in the mood for a gripping thriller with compelling performances and a thought-provoking narrative, Ricochet is definitely worth a watch.

Note: Thankfully I-Tea gets much better than in the first 5 minutes :)
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Vile and Silly with its Wavering and Wandering Tone
LeonLouisRicci8 November 2014
The Problem Here is Tone. It Wanders and Waivers at the Drop of a Profanity. The Movie is Vile and Then Cute and Cuddly. There are Individual Set Pieces that are Effective and Brutal and There are Scenes that are Cringe Inducing, Like a Switch of Allegiance with a Backstory that is Barely Hinted and Does Not Ring True.

Denzel Washington and John Lithgow are the Right Actors in the Right Roles but are Betrayed by the Lame Script, Inept Storytelling, and a Style that is Pedestrian.

It can be a Guilty Pleasure for Sure, but that Only Reinforces the Mishandling of the Material and a Result of Rubbernecking at Powerful Actors being Prostituted for Cheap Thrills. Kevin Pollak is Wasted in a Sleepwalking Role.

The Movie Works at Times but Unravels So Often it is a Frustrating Film that Never Finds its Legs and is Herky-Jerky the Way it Fluctuates its Presentation. The Third-Act is the Worst of the Three as Characters Betray Their Previous Personas and Become Cattle Herded Into the Slaughterhouse for a Cheesy Conclusion.

Yes, the Whole Movie is Cheesy but Not as Smelly as the Completely Clunky Ending.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Beretta in the butt beats a butterfly in a boot.
lastliberal-853-2537081 January 2014
You know what they say about sex. Well, the same applies to Denzel Washington. Even a bad Denzel flick is better than no Denzel flick.

I'm not saying this is a bad flick, but the story line is pretty predictable. The racial overtones, the rough language, the hard action - all in Denzel's films, but in others it is a little more polished.

John Lithgow plays the criminal out to get revenge and boy, is he scary! I wouldn't want him after me. he makes Hannibal Lecter look saintly.

And, for those fans out there that like having a rapper in their movies, we have Ice-T. Totally cool!
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Way, Way, WAY over the top
metalface10116 June 2005
Don't get me wrong, I like Denzel Washington. I like John Lithgow. I just don't like them together in this movie! Too many implausible situations for me to believe anything like these events could actually happen in real life even though yea, I know, it's ONLY a movie. No real character development, just a lot of action, sex, violence. And we're supposed to believe Denzel, as the cop, paid his way through law school?? One scene towards the end was right out of "White Heat". I'm sure they weren't paying homage to that excellent James Cagney movie, the director probably just ran out of ideas. Watch once if you feel the need and forget about it.........or watch Philadelphia instead.
17 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Some fun performances overcome unlikely plot
smatysia1 February 2002
OK, there are certainly a number of plot holes in this film. (Doesn't anyone at all supervise prison inmates in California?) But there were some interesting performances here, particularly John Lithgow. He attacks this villain role with sadistic glee, an interesting contrast to his total earnestness in "Terms of Endearment". Watch for Jesse Ventura as a prison inmate. I think this film is worth seeing.

Oh, and one more thing. The song over the closing credits, I assume by Ice-T, was a bit jarring. OK, I'm a middle-aged white guy, and don't listen to rap music, but I'm not a prude. However the song is so filled with "nigga" this, and "mothahf___kah" that, that as I say, I found a bit jarring in this day and age. I suppose that rap is still filled with this sort of theme. Grade: B-
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
One of the worst movies I have ever seen.
allygory15 October 2003
The characters have absolutely no depth, the good guy too good, the bad guys too bad, nothing to make them anything more than cartoon characters, and every performance was overacted.

I rented this with a group of people and I think it cost us about 50 cents a piece.. and I still wanted my money back.

Horrible
11 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Unusual Action Film benefits from Sharp Performances.
hu6752 July 2005
Rookie Cop (Two Time Oscar-Winner:Denzel Washington) has come a long way from the tough streets of L.A., Nick's life changed forever when he becomes a celebrity. When he stopped a ruthless psychotic killer by the name of Blake (John Lithgow). Nick becomes a media sensation, when it was captured on video by a bystander. Nick's career takes off as a lawyer, while the criminal is behind bars. Seven years has passed... Nick never realize that Blake is being planning the perfect plan of intimidation, public humiliation and murder. Nick has no choice to ask for help, when he ask his old friend (Ice T). Which his old friend has become a Street Hustler while dealing drugs and stealing cars at the same time. Together with the help of another friend (Kevin Pollak) to set a trap for Blake.

Directed by Russell Mulcahy (Highlander, Resurrection, The Shadow) made an entertaining, lurid, action/thriller. This film is also campy at times, especially for this interesting premise. Lithgow offers a scene stealing performance as the villain, which he is entertaining. Mulcahy even manages to give a Highlander homage in a scene. Victoria Dollard (T.V.'s Spin City) also co-star in the film as Nick's wife.

DVD has an sharp non-anamorphic Widescreen (2.35:1) transfer and an terrific-Dolby 2.0 Surround Sound. This film has never been a box office hit but it did become a cult hit on video and a television favorite. The film's only flaw is the silly conclusion but Mulcahy keeps things moving in the film. Do not miss this far-fetched but strong Action/Thriller. Screenplay by Steven E. de Souza (Beverly Hills Cop 3, Commando, Street Fighter). From a Story by Fred Dekker (Night of the Creeps) and Menno Meyjes (Max). Panavision. (****/*****).
11 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Will have you mouthing 'really' a lot, but usually with a smile.
oneguyrambling20 April 2012
Nick Styles (Denzel Washington) is an ambitious up and coming policeman studying law with an eye on entering the legal system sooner rather than later.

His big break occurs when another similarly ambitious man – albeit in another field of endeavour – transgresses the boundaries of the law directly in front of Nick, and more tellingly a man holding a video camera. The ensuing media coverage makes a minor 80s viral star of Nick, allowing him to rapidly advance into the offices of the District Attorney, while simultaneously ending the fledgling criminal career of one Earl Talbot Blake (John Lithgow).

Blake stews in his own juices in prison for years, allowing his grudge against Nick to become an obsession. An obsession that is not helped by the frequent media coverage his more popular nemesis continues to garner.

Blake formulates an escape / vengeance combo that is as impossibly convoluted as it is (apparently) embarrassingly easy to pull off. After his daring and bloody escape that leaves many dead – according to the authorities Blake among them – he easily and painlessly infiltrates Nick's family, career and inner circle within mere days, somehow managing to turn Nick from a local law abiding hero into a pariah wanted by the law, hated by the public and mistrusted by his own friends and family.

In case you haven't guessed by now Ricochet is unbelievably silly, but unbelievably silly fun, back in the days when R rated movies were still allowed that indulgence.

Lithgow has a ball as the profane, violent and intense Earl Talbot Blake, some of his disgusting statements and retorts are blackly quotable, and his over the top mannerisms and facial gestures are so serious they're hilarious. Denzel too allows himself to get a little dirty, he swears up a storm and even though it is not his intention manages to bang a hooker and ingest a powerful cocktail of illicit substances, all in the one scene.

Having Ice T around as a smack talking ne'er do well just adds flavour to proceedings, and Kevin Pollack gets to try a couple of his character impressions as Nick's former partner and best buddy.

Ricochet is violent, silly, implausible and somehow absurdly entertaining. It is over the top in all the right ways, stopping short of Crank level histrionics, but thankfully going a lot further than many of today's PC influenced sober snoozefests.

Final Rating – 6.5 / 10. I can't say that it is that great a movie, but you'll never be bored, and the film pulls out all the stops to hold your attention, even if for much of the time your eyes are bugged and you are mouthing 'Really?' incredulously.

I liked Ricochet as a gormless kid in my late teens, I am pleased to say I enjoyed it almost as much today, but perhaps for slightly different reasons.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Ugh.
jjgoard25 March 2003
I'm only reviewing this because I suspect it's the worst action-thriller I've ever seen. The plot is idiotic; Lithgow's villain uses tactics that could only work if he knows exactly how his target will react, and if the latter uses absolutely no strategic thought. As is typical of the genre, all of the hero's problems are instantly erased by a final battle. But this piece of junk goes one step further, having a reporter announce that obviously, the mere presence of the villain clears everything up. Puh-leeze.
9 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Oddly entertaining
sibleybridges25 June 2020
I rated Ricochet (1991) 6/10. What an odd grab bag of every 80s and 90s trope. It's even stranger that it's entertaining even though it's all over the place. Something about it just works even though it shouldn't.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
CHEER! - (7 stars out of 10)
BJG-Reviews18 March 2021
The stage curtains open ...

"Ricochet" features Denzel Washington in one of his first action roles as L.A. police officer, Nick Styles. This was the first movie I had ever seen Denzel in, and I became an immediate fan. There is a certain swagger that comes with youth, and Denzel demonstrates some of that here, but nothing over-the-top, or flashy. And despite the fact that he strips down to his underwear in public and makes an incredible behind-the-back gunshot - lol, he reins it in and stays in control.

After police officer, Nick Styles, takes down a hitman named, Earl Talbot Blake (John Lithgow) - using the method described above - during a standoff where Blake has taken a hostage, Styles goes on to become a hero, while Blake is sent to prison. While in prison, Blake has had plenty of time to plan his revenge, and Styles runs for, and becomes an Assistant District Attorney. Blake fights to gain respect among the prisoners, while Styles marries his sweetheart and has two beautiful daughters. But, when Blake finally manages to escape prison, he sets his plan in motion to tear Styles's world apart.

I had a lot of fun watching this one. I was surprised with the casting of John Lithgow as the film's "bad guy", but I have to admit, he surprised me and carried his role as the villain very well. Very believable and effective. Also, we have Ice-T in the role as Styles's gangster friend, Odessa, who plays a pivotal role in the film. The action sequences were tight, the dialogue a bit cheesy in parts, but overall pretty good. The premise was solid, and the plot and character development was well done.

I would recommend this action fare to the action fan. It scores a solid 7 stars out of 10. It might've rated higher 30 years ago when it came out, but it hasn't aged that well, to be honest. This isn't one of Denzel Washington's strongest movies, but it was a strong start. Certainly a worthy entry into his body of work.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed