"Great Performances" The Lost Language of Cranes (TV Episode 1991) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
16 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Painfully Bitter
gftbiloxi31 March 2005
With a sharp story, tremendous irony, brilliantly low key performances, and elegant direction and cinematography, THE LOST LANGUAGE OF CRANES received tremendous acclaim when it debuted in 1992; a decade later it has lost but little of its original punch.

Based on the notable novel by David Leavitt, CRANES offers the story of Philip (Angus Macfayden), an attractive young Englishman who has fallen in love with the wealthy and manipulative American Elliot (Corey Parker)--and on the basis of that love decides to inform his parents that he is gay. But Philip's announcement precipitates a crisis that he cannot imagine: his own father Owen (Brian Cox) is homosexual, a secret he has concealed from wife Rose (Eileen Atkins) since their marriage. At the same time, Philip discovers the foundation of his love with Philip is considerably less stable than he thought, and suddenly all concerned in the story find their lives built on shifting sand.

The performances are what make the film work, and while Mcfayden and Cox have the showier roles (and are excellent in them), it is really actress Eileen Atkins who emerges as the powerhouse performer in the complex role of a woman who has deliberately lived in denial--and who must now respond to a double-whammy that undercuts the very foundation of her existence. Carefully controlled, Atkins delivers a flawless performance with incredible weight and realism.

The flaw in the film is the script, which tends toward a certain clinical, slightly artificial awkwardness from time to time, and although the film offers many interesting visual metaphors, it ties them so loosely to the overall story that it is often difficult to know to what these metaphors refer. Even so, THE LOST LANGUAGE OF CRANES offers a powerhouse punch in its message of the need for honesty lest one be trapped into a way of living that slowly and but inextricably destroys the opportunities of youth--and leaves one with the bitter realization that the effort of keeping the lie alive has left one with little more than the lie itself. Powerful stuff; recommended.

Gary F. Taylor, aka GFT, Amazon Reviewer
11 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Low-key
preppy-32 November 2006
Story about two young men in England--Philip (Angus Macfayden) and Eliot (Corey Parker)--falling in love. Philip tells his parents--his mother thinks it's a disaster--his father (Brian Cox) remains strangely quiet. It turns out HE'S gay too and his sons coming out is forcing him into a decision.

Low-key drama. I caught it on PBS (slightly edited) and then saw it complete on VHS in the early 1990s. I liked it but can't say I was too impressed. For starters the low-key aspect of the story was TOO low-key. Everything seemed muted. Macfayden and Parker were (surprisingly) terrible in their roles. I never believed these guys even liked each other, let alone love each other. So a crucial turn halfway through didn't carry the emotional weight it should have. The happy ending all around seemed too pat for me also.

Still it was brave to make a movie like this back in 1991 AND get it distributed. It was well-directed and well-written. Also Cox was excellent in his role. So, it IS interesting in terms of gay cinema--it portrays gay men in a realistic manner (especially having hunky, masculine Macfayden play one) but it just doesn't come across strongly enough. Worth a viewing but don't go out of your way.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Serious drama about coming out and hiding secrets
wilcabral8 December 2007
The lost language of cranes" is a British TV movie based on the novel by David Leavitt. The problem when you see a movie adaptation of a book you have already read -- and loved -- is that either the adaptation is not faithful and betrays the book, or it is too faithful and just looks like a summary of the story. Very rarely a movie adaptation can remain faithful to the essence of the book but not so literal that it brings nothing new to the story; unfortunately, that's the case here.

It tells the story of a family, the Benjamins, who have lots of secrets. Owen Benjamin, played by Brian Cox, is a closeted homosexual married to Rose (Eileen Atkins). Every Sunday Owen goes to a porno cinema, where he has anonymous sex with men. Owen and Rose's son, Philip (Angus MacFadyen), is also a gay man, but he has no problems with his sexuality. He's very much in love with Elliot (Corey Parker), a young American artist who was raised by a gay couple. The conflict starts when Philip decides to come out to his parents, making his father face his own desire and his mother confront her own prejudice.

The most surprising fact about this British adaptation of an American novel is how little the change of place from New York to London affects the story. Indeed, this adaptation is so faithful to the original that whole dialogs from the book appear on the screen, almost unchanged. And yet, we get to know from the bonus interviews on this DVD that the porno cinema, which plays such an important role in the story, was a real problem in the adaptation because there were no such places in London, due to their laws. So apparently the screenwriter, Sean Mathias, had to "create" a porno cinema that never existed, appropriately called "the Fantasy".

Among the sacrifices that had to be made for the sake of the length of the movie, the one I most regret is the use of the character Jerene, played by Cathy Tyson. In the novel, Jerene is a full and complex character, a black lesbian student who was rejected by her parents and develops a thesis about languages that are lost forever, like the little boy who, neglected by his mother, learned to communicate looking at the cranes from his window. In the movie, Jerene appears only to explain the title of the film and little else.

If you haven't read the novel, you will find this movie a very interesting drama about a family having to face their hidden secrets, but without ever raising their voices, which is very British! If you already know the book, however, you may feel a little disappointed.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Honesty has a Language of its own
tim.halkin8 February 2003
The film offers two metaphors for the suppression of expression - young twins, who have never been taught an established language, and hence create one of their own; and a neglected child, who's only company is the view it has of a building site with several large cranes from the window: the child begins to imitate the cranes' movements and noises in an attempt to communicate with them. No fear - the symbolism is kept to a minimum.

At the film's core, are three people, all of whom have been suppressing their real feelings (their real selves) from the others for fear of change - for fear of disrupting the balance of their existence. This lack of expressing themselves in language, causes them to create their own "language of cranes".

They're terrified that the truth will rip apart the world as they know it, which it does. The viewer is left with their loose ends, wondering if honesty really was the best. Everything they feared about honesty comes to pass. The family is torn apart without a way back. The mother is left feeling like the punch line of a bad joke and the father will be left with 30 years of remorse and guilt. But they're free. They're alive and free - and they still have time to take advantage of their second chance at life.

There are no action scenes here, but this film is more suspenseful than a thriller. If you have ever kept a secret from someone you loved - beware - this film might make you feel very uncomfortable.

Bottom line: a wonderful script, excellent acting and well directed on a small budget. A must see!
16 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
learning the language of honesty in relationships
jvframe7 June 2005
I have not read the David Leavitt novel on which this film is based, and though I'm certainly keen to do so, I do not believe it would be a prerequisite for any sensible person to follow the storyline or to empathise with the struggles and joys of these characters.

Nigel Finch has done a magnificent job in allowing us to study every nuance of interaction between the characters - spoken dialogue is certainly a minor aspect of their communications.

This is the only film I know of which deals with angst over what must be a common enough fact of life among gay men and lesbians - that one of their parents is also gay. This angst has nothing to do with genetics, but as shown in the film, everything to do with a culture which stifled honest communication in favour of dutifully mimicking the apparent norm.

Beautifully textured in sight and sound - and with superb acting from all players. This is an ideal conversation starter for any husband or wife with some (perhaps unsurprising) news that they need to share with their partner.

An especially empowering film for any gay man who suspects their dad could have made some radically different life choices if born in the current age.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
a sweet, touching movie
wildpreciouslife4 May 2001
I rented this film because of Angus MacFadyen, who did such a great job in "Cradle Will Rock." I am also very impressed with his work here. "Cranes" is a story about the many complicated facets of coming out, keeping secrets, sharing life with others, and being true to yourself. It has a richly thoughtful plot, and some of the sweetest love scenes I've seen. It's definitely a must see for gay/queer/rainbow folk, and those who want to understand a little more about coming out.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Sensitive BBC Drama
harry-7614 June 2000
This is a compassionate, beautifully acted drama of human emotions and desires, amongst a well-educated, middle class British family and their aacquaintances. Made in 1991, produced for the BBC and WNET, and telecast in the United Kingdom on June 24, 1992, this is one tv production which deserves to and will undoubtedly last a long time.

Heading the cast is Angus MacFadyen as a sensitive young man who is well adjusted with his lifestyle, and who can express himself intelligently, and carry himself with dignity. A look at MacFadyen's career roles is surprising, with this film marking his debut. Between '91 and '00 he has played an impressive number of widely varied characters, from Orson Welles and Richard Burton to Hitler and Zeus, surely the mark of a gamely actor!

Eileen Atkins contributes a sensibly realized portrait of a knowing wife and mother, and Sean Mathias and David Leavitt's script is quite perceptive, based on Leavitt's original novel. A very well crafted tv production. ###
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Great Eye Candy
tvman857030 July 2007
I would change places with the three gorgeous guys (Angus, Ben and Corey) in no special order just to kiss them. I am sure that a woody would occur. A snow ball in hell would have a better chance than I would at my age.

Although this film was made in the early 90's anyone would find it a great movie. Oh come on! All movies have flaws. Try making a perfect movie on a limited budget and limited distribution.

The title is a little misleading but the book explains it yet not detailed enough.

Purchase it! You will not be disappointed.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Read first
habibi8116 November 2007
I had read the novel of David Leavitt which this movie is based on just before watching it. I have to say that the novel was great, very well written and full of sincere feelings. Though, the movie is terrible. I can't say if it is because of being a TV movie, because it was made in the early 90's or just bad interpretation. The actors seem all the time to be waiting for the other to give them lines. The only scene I would save is when Jerene and the guys are in the park. A scene that didn't happen in the book. You don't need to have read the book to watch it as you'll follow properly. Though, there are some stuff that you'll miss because you don't have the background explanation. All the story about their past is lost in the film. Though, I would definitely recommend reading the book before watching this so you'll realise it is a very good story but a bad production. I wished I was a cinema director so I'd do a new version. I gave the maximum mark to this because I can't be fair with this. The book is extremely good.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Beautiful Movie
NicelyMalicious5 June 2000
I bought this movie because (a) Angus MacFadyen stars; and (b) it was supposed to be a movie about a gay man who decides to come out to his parents when he finds himself falling in love. It was that, but it has so much more to offer than that aspect of homosexuality.

What impressed me most about the movie is that it shows gay men as having actual affection for each other. So many other movies seem to think it's OK to show gay men as long as they're not "flaunting" the physical aspect of their relationships. This movie allows us to see them as people who actually care about one another.

Angus MacFadyen - long hailed for his expressive eyes - is great as Philip, the son opening up to his parents, and thus inadvertently bringing their marriage into question. Brian Cox is wonderful as the father who decides, after years of living the "proper", straight life, he must now be true to himself. MacFadyen and Cox have a great chemistry, as Cox's Owen seeks to understand his own feelings by getting in touch with his son's. Both are fabulous actors who know the fine art of subtext.

One caveat: the box has Corey Parker as the headlining star. He's not. He's good as the emotionally unavailable - and quite annoying in light of Philip's sensitivity and openness - lover, but he's only there for a short time.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hypnotizing family drama
kelicom11 November 2000
I was alternately surprised, impressed, and repelled by this film. This is not actually a gay love story, but the story of a family, and how they deal with (and not deal with) the truth. Both the father and the son are gay, and the mother, Rose (Eileen Atkins), lives in denial for years, until her son, Philip (Angus Macfadyen), bravely tears the walls down.

Rose is sharp as a tack, but so tightly controlled, she doesn't allow the truth to sink in. Not much goes over her head, but when the information doesn't fit into her plans, she simply ignores it. When she finally faces the reality of her marriage, it falls apart.

Owen (Brian Cox) is the father-- his whole life, he has lived a lie. His character is weak and not very bright, but he means well. He does his duty in caring for his family, and it's clear he genuinely loves them. Unfortunately, he's the most childlike in the family--he reacts, rather than initiates, and he remains childlike till the end.

Philip is the catalyst in the family--he brings the secrets out in the open. His character shows a lot of wisdom and initiative, both in his family and love relationships. This was Angus Macfadyen's first major film, although it was originally a BBC production. He is young, lean and amazingly sensitive in his performance. He is so good in this role, I was convinced he is gay.

The writers of the film (David Leavitt, Sean Mathias) suggest that homosexuality is the result of both environment and genetics. Elliot, Philip's lover, is the adopted son of two gay men. Philip is the biological son of a man who is gay. Elliot's housemate, a social worker, reveals that a child's life is shaped by his environment after he is neglected and left alone--he begins to imitate a crane, the only stimulation he has. Another case is revealed, of two twins who have their own secret language. It's a fascinating subject to speculate on if you like to figure out what makes people tick (I do).

The acting all around is phenomenal. The director too (Nigel Finch), did a wonderful job. So much is said with looks and gestures, volumes are communicated with eyes alone. Nothing was glossed over in this film--each character has his/her own strengths and weakness, both gay and straight. How refreshing, especially in a film about intimacy.

The music is also good. The whole atmosphere is one of loneliness and desperation, and it's fascinating to watch, from an American perspective, because we just don't make movies like that. Our films are usually much more glamorized or dramatized, so this film was especially magnetic to me.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
nicely done
nromanosky16 October 2001
A meaningful adaptation of David Leavitt's novel. The characters are a bit underdeveloped, but it makes you think of Hemingway's iceberg theory: sometimes you have to intuit to get to the essence of things.

The juxtaposition of the crane sequences with the linear narrative of the film are eerie and very moving, and the performances are well observed, overall. Plus the love scenes really make you realize the leg up that British TV has on its American counterpart--what a treat!

I'd love to see this screenplay adapted to the book's New York setting, but this version is none the worse for the change of location. Please see it if you can.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Worth viewing, if you can find it...
ziggy-2213 February 1999
A son "comes out of the closet" to his parents. A movie that starts with this simple premise turns into a fascinating drama about the origins of sexual preference.

Is it genetics, environment or a little of both that influence the sexual preference of an individual? It is revealed later in the movie that the father is a repressed homosexual that did all the "right" things in his life. He married, had a son, and maintained a modest, conservative household. Outwardly, there was nothing wrong with his life. Inwardly, he was miserable.

A subplot cleverly approaches the environment question when a three-year-old boy is discovered abandoned by his parents and his unusual actions are studied by a social worker. The curious title for this film stems from this subplot.

In the end, how one deals with their sexual preference may be more important than knowing the origins of their preference.

The surprise for most will be Rene Auberjonois ("Deep Space Nine"), for his non-stereotypical portrayal of an openly gay man.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
one of the best gay movies
kasper-39 December 1998
I truly recommend it...especially for gay girls and guys who don´t have to come to terms with their gayness. This film is a breathtaking experience....
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Interesting film to watch!
guil1227 October 2001
I found this movie very intriguing to watch. I particularily liked the way Philip chose to live his life. His honesty within himself, his giving of his love to Elliot openly without question. Some of the sex scenes were hot! The subplot about Philip's Dad and his battle with his homosexuality was handled very well. Both Owen and Rose were well played by the actors. The recognition scene was painful to watch yet very realistic. Most of the gay scenes, including the bar scenes were well done. If you've ever been to a gay bar, and I have, there is a certain dark somber feeling that exists in spite of all the dancing and prancing about. You see in the eyes of the hunters and those being hunted a sadness and desperate need to be conquered or to conquer. You see this a lot in QUEER AS FOLK. The bar scene. See this film if not just for the pleasure to see Philip find his way. And, of course, it doesn't hurt that Philip is also gorgeous!
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
read the book first!
SapphireCate4 January 2002
a very good movie (at least if you like gay-sploitation films) but read the book (by David Leavitt) first or it won't totally make sense. Angus MacFadyen gives a beautiful and soulful performance, and the visuals of the child and crane are haunting.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed