Stuff Stephanie in the Incinerator

I recently watched the Tromaville picture Stuff Stephanie in the Incinerator (1989) on Tubi. The storyline follows a couple who get caught by the rich and put in a game of life and death.

This picture is directed by Don Nardo, in his line directorial project, and stars Neil McGarry (Killing Dinner), Catherine Dee (Dead Rain), Paul Nielsen (Embrace of the Vampire) and Phil Vincent (Proper Binge).

This is one of those films that had great potential and a unique premise, but does absolutely nothing with it. The films starts with a wild "old lady" that wants to watch people have sex. I thought this was going to be great. There's really no worthwhile horror elements. The games were cheesy and there's no worthwhile kills...the entire movie. The cinematography is also mediocre and feels low budget.

In conclusion, I generally enjoy Troma films for what they are, but this one badly misses the mark. I would score this a 2.5-3/10 and recommend skipping it.

Less than awful. My cat produces better viewing fare from his behind without even trying. The people who made this atrocity should compensate viewers for the time lost watching it. It's just BAD film making across the board. Pitiful acting, terrible sound quality, no perceptible direction or production qualities (they must have been drugged out porn capitalists with money to burn) it's hard to believe that there were any professionals involved in this thing at all. Perhaps the makers of this poor excuse for a movie were simply high on their own egos. That would be my best guess. It's the sort of thing I would be embarrassed to find under my name on an internet search. Not even worthy of irony.

This is a really cool movie. One of the most unique films I've seen. The characters are as hilarious as they are unpredictable, the script is mind blowing, with more plot twists than any other film I've seen. [Good Plot twists, not absurd ones like Wild Things]

This movie is so bad it makes Police Academy 6 look like Citizen Kane. There isn't one single good thing about it. Bad dialogue, deathly bad acting, horrendous camera work, terrible writing, a lame and pointless plot, not so special effects, unbearably bad pacing, shoddy directing, etc.... The title makes no sense with the movie but I guess you can't name a movie "Piece Of S**t" That is exactly what this movie is. > It's long and very boring. It doesn't even fit any category of movie: Action? What action? It's slow and meandering. Drama? I personally see more drama in a Hagar The Horrible comic strip. SciFi? Not with these lousy effects. Horror? I've coughed up scarier crap. Suspense? Romance? No it's just bad. This movie is so bad it gives me new insight into the depths of human depravity and makes me lose all hope for the human species all together. Who put this movie together? Who paid for it? Who thought it sounded good? Why did people actually waste the time of day making it? Why are they not ritualistically beheaded for the benefit of all mankind? If this is what people find entertaining then we are surely doomed to a bleak existence. If there truly was a GOd he would never have allowed it to go this far. I guess what I'm trying to say is that I feel cheated out of the 50 cents I paid to rent this. This is my flag to warn all of humanity to stay away from a movie so bad it escapes any term the English language has to describe it. It took me seven tries to watch it all the way through because I continually fell asleep throughout it. Each part I watched I hoped would redeem it and each time I was let down by subpar performance. They couldn't even get a decent looking female lead to make up for the movies numerous gaping inadequacies. I'm currently now enrolled in a 12 step program to help recover from the paralyzing effects of this the worst of all movies. With patience maybe one day I can rent movies without fear again.

I saw this movie a couple of years ago, after I saw the trailor when I rented "Return To Boggy Creek". Of course, this movie IS "bad". But that depends on what your definition of "bad" is. No doubt about it, this film was independant and low-budget. But when you think about it, a blockbuster like "The Blair Witch Project" probably cost even less to make, so who cares? I was actually surprised to see that this movie was made in '89. I thought for sure it was a late 70's flick. If you like low-budget 80's horror movies that should be played on TNT's Monstervision, RENT THIS! However, if you refuse to bend out of conformity, and only will see million-dollar Hollywood projects, stay very far away. (Keep in mind you most likely won't be able to find this movie at Blockbuster, but possibly at an independant local movie rental store). *An 80's B-movie classic.*