Signs of Life (1989) User Reviews

Depressing New England soap opera

[fluglotse1 · 7/10 · 9 September 1998]

A boat builder in a sleepy town in Maine is going out of business, and the lives of all of the (soon to be ex-)workers and families are disrupted. The biggest disappointment is that the two stars--Bates and Bridges--have only bit parts.

Interesting, but not something you would see twice.

Typical Made For TV Garbage Which Wasn't Made For TV

[mcjensen-05924 · 2/10 · 2 April 2023]

Everything was by the numbers for this melodramatic soap operaesque movie. No worse or better than others from this era, which isn't really saying anything. The story is good, and the location is beautiful. The execution falls way short of the mark, unfortunately. The cast is spotty, ranging from absulutely awful performances to quite decent ones. Inane dialogue ruins the day, and inept directing spoils what may have been entertaining viewing. The highlights of the movie are the muscle car and the boats. Beau's performance is hardly adequate. Mary Louise Parker is captivating as always, but ultimately her role amounts to zilch. Very clumsy direction and pointless side stories detract from any momentum. The rating here is preposterous as usual. A forgettable movie from start to finish. The old bugger who runs the failing boatyard is incompetent as an actor, whoever he is. It starts bad and gets worse as it unfolds. The characters end up coming across as idiotic bumbling morons, and that's not the case with the people of the era at all. Horrendous. One star for Parker and one for the scenery, which we don't get to see nearly enough of. Half the movie is filler of dragging scenes with close ups on faces which seem to be hoping this film doesn't sink their career. Rightfully so. The stupidity of it all will astound even people who usually lap up this inane drivel. Pure slop.

Just one of those movies

[repokat-1 · 10/10 · 31 December 2005]

I saw this movie on PBS the first time. Then I bought the video and watched it countless times. Every time I watch it, I can get something else out of it. It's a real testament to wanting to hold onto a life that was good, but now the world is changing. But you don't have to be older to hold onto the past, even the young characters, like Charlotte don't want things to change. The overall tone and mood is excellent. The cast is outstanding with all-stars like Kathy Bates, Beau Bridges and Arthur Kennedy. And its fun to see the upcoming stars before they hit more recognizable feature films, like Kevin J. O'Connor (The Mummy) and Vincent D'Onofrio (Men in Black and Law & Order: Criminal Intent-one of my favorite shows). Its just one of those movies that stays with you.

A Moving American Playhouse presentation

[DougR-2 · 8/10 · 7 January 2002]

I first saw "Signs of Life" on PBS as an American Playhouse presentation. It's a wonderfully written, ensemble production with terrific performances by Michael Lewis as Joey and Vincent D'Onofrio as his brother, Daryl. Arthur Kennedy, in one of his last roles, is also excellent as an aging shipbuilder whose family business is about to close. The rest of the cast which includes Beau Bridges, Kathy Bates and Mary-Louise Parker give remarkable clarity and substance to their characters.

The direction is subtle and effective. I've watched this movie several times over the years and would very much recommend it. A beautiful piece of filmmaking.

Captivating

[bejasus · 8/10 · 26 May 2003]

It's not real flashy, but this movie does a great job of developing a large cast of characters, and letting you know their hopes and desires, while still managing to be both funny and bittersweet. A very sweet movie. Fun, also, to see Vincent D'Onofrio and Mary-Louise Parker so early in their careers.

Counting Crows

[SteveSkafte · 10/10 · 22 May 2010]

In one sense, "Signs of Life" is a fantasy, full of vibrant photography and off-center characterizations. But it is also grounded in a dramatic sense, with a collection of fantastic actors all providing convincing performances. Aging shipbuilder Owen Coughlin (Arthur Kennedy) is the central focus of the ensemble cast. Every character, regardless of minimal screen-time, feels perfectly fleshed out. It was a real pleasure to watch Vincent D'Onofrio, Beau Bridges and Mary-Louise Parker especially.

"Signs of Life" is a collection of individual short stories, all weaving together to make a surprisingly coherent whole. Mark Malone's script is brilliant in how it manages this without losing interest. But it's entirely possible that an even better film could exist based solely around the Kennedy character. The dialogue really lets you get under the skin to the real human sides of these people. Two elements of the production stand out specifically well. The soundtrack by Howard Shore is understated and engaging. Elliot Davis photographs the film perfectly, using color and light in fascinating and revelatory ways scene after scene. And the direction by John David Coles is also good, giving the right balance to both fantasy and reality.

There's always more than enough to keep the viewer interested, fascinating, and entertained. Something about "Signs of Life" really moved me. I hope it will do the same for you.

small wonders

[mjneu59 · 8/10 · 3 January 2011]

This unassuming sleeper is being sold as an inspirational 'feel good' movie because of a minor miracle tacked awkwardly onto the final scenes, but the film is more about those moments of transition in our lives when anything can happen, tracing 24 fateful hours in the life (and death) of an old New England shipyard facing imminent closure. It's the sort of small town, ensemble character drama where the writing and acting are more than usually critical, and (fortunately) this one has both: an original, unpredictable script and a strong cast led by veteran Arthur Kennedy, still a tough bird at age 75. Under John David Coles' direction the film is delicate but never fragile, sensitive but never sentimental, and whimsical without ever losing its grip on reality. Because it doesn't call much attention to itself some word of mouth would clearly have helped the film reach an audience but, considering the throwaway release it received, viewers today will have a difficult time tracking it down