Landscape in the Mist (1988) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
38 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
like a dream you can't shake
mjneu5930 November 2010
A quest for an unknown father becomes an odyssey into adulthood for two illegitimate Greek children, traveling alone the length of their country in a hopeless attempt to trace the whereabouts of a man they know only from the bedside fairy tales told by their mother. The journey is often grim and brutal, but is also filled by occasional magic, transforming their search into a sometimes sweet, sometimes bitter reflection of childhood mysteries and adolescent pain.

The reticent screenplay and slow, deliberate rhythms will likely be tedious to anyone with a TV-damaged attention span, but the same understated detachment can sometimes have a devastating impact, for example during a rape scene made all the more chilling for taking place just out of view, and in total silence. Discriminating viewers able to avoid nodding off into their popcorn will find it a film of rare beauty, with an emotional resonance to match the often haunting imagery.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Some Strong Imagery
gavin694225 May 2017
A road movie about two children (Voula and Alexandre) searching for their father who is supposed to live in Germany. Their obsession for this father figure will take them to the boundaries between childhood and adolescence.

"Landscape in the Mist" was Angelopoulos' first film to be distributed in the United States, being distributed by New Yorker Films. This also happens to be the first of his films that I have seen, and one of the first Greek films, for that matter. (If I have seen more than ten Greek films I would be surprised.) The concept is great, but what really sells the film is some of the strong imagery. The most gripping part of the entire film was when a helicopter came and lifted something out of the water... it was captivating and seemed to possess far more meaning than it possibly should have.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Another flawed masterwork from Angelopoulos
runamokprods18 December 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I seem to have the same reaction to each of Angelopoulos' films; flawed genius. But in each film, the flaws and what feels masterful is different.

Mild spoilers ahead...

In this story of a 12 year old girl and her younger brother on a fruitless journey for their non- existent father in Germany what works is the ultimate emotional impact of the piece (it left me in tears), and (as always) the sheer poetic power of some of Angelopoulos' images.

On the other hand, a key supporting character (the youthful actor Oresteis) is thinly written and exists basically as an overly-convenient plot point. Some of the dialogue and ideas feel heavy handed, and some images are lifted from other director's films. And the references to his own earlier film 'The Traveling Players' are an interesting, brave style choice, but also a bit distracting and intellectual. The young girl's acting is mostly terrific, but the young boy feels fake at times, which doesn't help.

There are scenes I'll never forget. Maybe the most disturbing (yet completely hidden) rape scene I've ever seen. But other scenes feel awkward or forced.

This is the kind of film that may grow on revisiting, and I certainly plan to see it again.
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Deliberate emotional complexity
peedur17 May 2001
A hard film to watch but an unforgettable experience. I was deeply moved by the damage done to these children in the raw, emptiness of the world of this film. Running away through Greece to seek out their theoretical father in an imagined Germany, they experience confusion, violation and epic indifference to their real and imagined needs. Momentary relief and hope is found in the form of a young man traveling with a theater company, but it is fleeting. The sheer simplicity of their need remain together and to go to Germany is, by the end, all that they have.

Angelopoulos, like other artists/poets/philosophers in film, has a very specific vision of the world which he is relating. There are moments in Landscape In The Mist where our trained needs for (Hollywood) film conventions, story structure and even simple answers cries out. Yet this is far from his intent; as with poetry, the film strives to state itself with images and ideas which leave the viewer not simply awed by beauty but also perplexed and emotionally disorganized as to how or what to to feel. To judge Angelopoulos on the same standards as a showbiz product is to miss the point. He believes film is art and not necessarily entertainment. One may dislike that vision but one will invariably be enriched by the journey if one can spend the time watching it with an open mind. Angelopoulos finds funding for his films and makes them for those who care to extend themselves into someone else's vision, not to reward investors by meeting a market need. He is a powerful artist. There are reasons why his films are not well known in the US, but those reasons are also what makes them fascinating, brilliant and rare experiences.
75 out of 85 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Greek pilgrimage
jandesimpson20 February 2002
Warning: Spoilers
SPOILER insofar that an attempt is made to interpret the end of the film.

If John Bunyan's The Pilgrim's Progress" is the greatest work of road literature, Theo Angelopoulos's "Landscape in the Mist" deserves similar status among road movies. I use this association deliberately as far too often this film is merely described as the search of an adolescent girl and her small brother for their father whom they have been led to believe has left their native Greece and is living in Germany.If this was all the film was about it would make little sense, for although set within the parameters of reality (wintry landscapes often brutalised by industry), strange things continually happen; a horse dies in a freezing square at night just as a wedding party is breaking up, people rush from a building as the first snowfall is announced and stand transfixed like statues gazing upwards, an elderly man enters an otherwise empty cafe and plays a melancholy tune on a violin for the small boy who has gone there in search of food, a helicopter slowly draws a giant sculptured hand from the sea until it is poised high above a harbour. And then there is the tiny fragment of photographic negative found in a city street that the boy then carries with him and which seems to show a solitary tree in a misty landscape which in turn becomes the background for the final shot of the film. It is impossible not to interpret the work as anything other than an allegory, like Bunyan's, as a quest for spiritual enlightenment. Only then can we understand that the border between Greece and the North is metaphysical rather than national. As the children cross from one country to another in a landscape completely shrouded in mist shots of border guards break out. Only through the transition between life and death can they reach the place they have been seeking. Since the loss of Satyajit Ray the mantle of the world's greatest director has, in my opinion, passed to Angelopoulos. "Landscape in the Mist" is the most sublime work he has yet given us.
50 out of 57 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
aka Landscape in the Mist
ABS-1325 October 2004
I saw this movie when it was playing in Berkeley in 1990. This is one of the most beautiful and haunting films I have ever seen. Filled with scenes of mythic beauty and magical realism. It is, on the surface, about two siblings search for their father, but it is also about the search for something both less obvious and more universal. It haunted my dreams for months and some of the images in this film have stayed with me to this day. If you are of a philosophical bent and are open to the experience, I believe you will enjoy this film very much.
40 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Appreciation.
ItalianGerry27 July 2001
Warning: Spoilers
Every once in a while a great film comes along which seems to transcend the medium, to give one faith in the movies, even hope that everything on this planet is not futile. LANDSCAPE IN THE MIST is such a film. It has garnered a great deal of critical acclaim wherever it has been shown and a top prize at the 1988 Venice Film Festival. LANDSCAPE IN THE MIST is the story of two Greek children, 11-year-old Voula and her 5-year-old brother Alexander, who wander across the start Greek winter landscape as they attempt to make their way, by train and by other means, to Germany. It is almost a mythic quest to find their father, who in reality does not even exist. Around this delicate framework, Angelopoulos has fashioned a work of soaring lyricism, a film of magniloquent majesty, a haunting poem that moves us to the depth of our souls. As with the work of some other great directors like Bergman, Kurosawa, Rossellini, Bresson and Antonioni, Angelopoulos' films require an especially intense effort on the part of the audience not often required or inclined to give itself so fully to a movie that even the consumption of popcorn seems an obscenity. Credit has to be given also to the photography of Giorgos Arvanitis and the impassioned musical backdrop of Eleni Karaindrou who would receive such acclaim for her score for Angelopoulos' subsequent ULYSSES' GAZE. Tonino Guerra, one of Fellini's constant scriptwriters, collaborated on the script.
27 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Still remember the two kids
sleex076 March 2006
Seen the movie in HK International Film Festival over 16 years ago and still could not stop crying whenever I think of the kids in the movie. Be prepare for a sad story. Yet, the whole movie was filmed so artistically and many scenes are so creative (esp. at the age of the production.) This is the only movie still linger in my brain from time to time. Still miss the kids in the movie and wish to be there to get them out of the difficult situations. It is the power of the movie, the power of the director/writer, the little actress and actor. No more description can replace the movie itself. To fill up lines - being a mom of 2 now after the years, I miss the kids in the movie even more.
24 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Inquires a viewer's patience as it dwells on long pauses and long walks
jordondave-2808515 June 2023
(1988) Landscapes In The Mist/ Topio stin omihli (In Greek with English subtitles) DRAMA/ ART HOUSE

Co-produced, co-written and directed by Theodoros Angelopoulos which the tone that is similar Michelangelo Antonioni's "L'Avventura" but there's a lack of rhythm or flow in terms of the structure centering on a couple of children going on an odyssey in search of their real father they had never met. There are way too many pause shots of them standing around doing nothing walking along the highway which can be metaphorically confusing and can frustrate the average impatient viewer, and it is those scenes that makes this 124 minutes quite long to watch. I never liked this film as I initially saw it, but as a result of reading and hearing other peoples interpretations I have grown to accept it. This is the third of three films of Angelopoulos's 'Silent Trilogy', even though they still can be watched without the others being seen. The other two are "Voyage to Cythera" released in 1983 and then "The Beekeeper" released in 1986.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Not Angelopoulos' Best
Mitch-5113 February 2006
Warning: Spoilers
This is not Angelopoulos' masterpiece (as the DVD would like one to believe), but there are still sequences of enormous beauty and emotion (even if some seem more contrived than organic). In this piece, Angelopoulos readily excels in his portrayal of violence, which is really very disturbing. Angelopoulos is not so successful in relating to the young girl in quite the same, effective way that he handles her younger brother and the young actor going into the army. One is tempted to think this is because he avoids close-ups (especially in the scene where she yells at her uncle), but, on the other hand, the same visual style is applied to the other characters. Perhaps it is Angelopoulos' own personal inability to relate to the young woman's plight in the story. The ending, however, of "Landscape in the Midst," like, "The Travelling Players" is quite transcendent and unforgettable. Even with all of its flaws, this is still one of the most moving pictures ever.
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Mesmerizing Masterpiece
tjsdshpnd5 December 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Landscape in the Mist (1988)

Dir : Theo Angelopoulos

This was my first Theo Angelopoulos movie and also my first Greek language film. Had read about Theo's movies earlier and viewed how it sparked polar opposite views. Some called his movies masterpieces in the sand of time. Some called them excruciatingly boring and a waste of time. I decided to find for myself. So decided to watch Landscape in the mist which was universally accepted as a masterpiece and for good reason.

Plot is about two kids wandering through the landscape of beautiful Greece to find their father which they imagine lives in Germany. It is about their experience, the people they meet and their ultimate coming of age. The movie is filled with strange and bizarre circumstances all throughout. In one scene, the director has depicted the joyful dance parade of a marriage in the background while a horse moans to his death in the foreground. That to me was one of the most perfect illustrations of life itself. Joy and sorrow being internal to life is the message he symbolically wants to put forward. There are other symbolic scenes as well, most prominent of which is the floating hand of a statue in the river. As a chopper pulls the hand out of the water and takes it across the highrise buildings it shows us how Ancient Greece and modern Greece have collided. The cinematography I must say is mesmerizing. The Greek landscape is extremely well depicted and could be an advertisement for Greece tourism. Theo's distinct style of lethargically reminiscing a scene is put forward here as well. He dwells and dwells over scenes. That may put some people to sleep. Overall, an exemplary movie which needs more recognition.

Rating : 7/10
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A coming of age story about two young souls in search of their fictive father.
saritray200118 February 2011
A journey is often the best way to find yourself, even if you are looking for something else. Greek director Theo Angelopoulos' film traces two runaway children – 11-year-old Voula (Tania Palaiologou) and her five- year-old brother Alexandros (Michalis Zeke) – as they search for a fictive father their mother made up stories about. On the road, they learn the realities of life – cruelty, violence and the crude struggle for survival, but also friendship and the first stirrings of romance. In a particularly startling scene, joy and sorrow are revealed simultaneously as a horse dies before their eyes, even as a marriage is mirthfully celebrated nearby. In another, the hand of a statue pulled out of the water could symbolise fragmentation, among several other things. In the end, the quest is hopeless. It's a desperate search for value, for meaning, for that indistinct dream you cling on to which gives life a sense of purpose.
10 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Very interesting and mystical, if somewhat flawed
Oblomov_819 October 2000
Theo Angelopoulos' "Landscape in the Mist" is not as emotionally involving as it should be, and yet it is still an oddly intriguing film. The story concerns two Greek children, Voula and Oreste, who were conceived out of wedlock by their mother. Too ashamed to tell them the truth, she claims their father is living in Germany. The kids run away, and encounter many odd incidents and people before the story reaches its conclusion, which involves a symbolic final shot that can be read in several different ways.

In depicting the ongoing struggle of the children, Angelopoulos keeps the two protagonists at too much of a distance for the audience to really identify with them. That's not to say that we do not feel sympathy for them in their plight, but it is hard to become attached to these characters when they are not given any distinct personalities or points of view. For instance, there is a scene halfway through the film where the Voula is brutally assaulted by a truck driver. I felt sorry for her character, but the scene didn't resonate throughout the rest of the film as it should have.

Still, "Landscape in the Mist" manages to succeed in spite of these flaws. Each scene has a different visual symbol attached to it that grabs the attention of the viewer. My two favorite moments involved Voula and Oreste running through the snow as surrounding villagers stand motionless staring into the sky, and the two watching a giant stone hand being pulled out of the sea by a helicopter and flying off into the distance. The former displays the perseverance of the children in a rigid adult world, and the latter hints that the two are being guided in their journey by an invisible force. Angelopoulos has given us a film that shows the innocence of children pitted against the brutal realities of the modern world, and has given us an admirable, if flawed, picture.
9 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Wanted to be tarkovsky, turned out to be garbage
theofernandes-7208816 October 2020
Movie is just a compilation of random images with no resemblance of narrative pacing or rhythm whatsoever. I'm not saying this because I don't like this sort of movie. It's quite the opposite, I love Tarkovsky. That's film poetry. This is nothing. It's visually pleasing, but lacks consistency to create some sort of meaning, some metaphoric images are interesting, but then they're just completely out of touch with the rest of the film. There's no actual feeling conveyed, you can't feel the characters. But the worst is the writing. Simply disastrous... And not because it's unnatural, that's acceptable for some conception of poetic film. But here... it's not beautiful, it lacks the poeticism it claims so bad to have.
8 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The 30 Greatest Films Ever Made, Continued
anonymous12425 August 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Edit: could whoever two people are responsible: what exactly did you find unhelpful about my review? Thanks.

When I first saw this film it was a random pick out of the library that looked interesting. I had not ever heard of it or read a single review. When I saw it I was convinced that it was one of the best and most beautiful films I had ever seen. Later, when I checked too see other reviews, they were all nasty and gave the film a very painful treatment. Worried, I went to see it again - had I overpraised it? Had I missed some flaws? No, I was right, and I'm sure the people who disagreed were wrong now. The film is still one of the best films ever made. It has been said to be a blend of Fellini and Traffaut - that is a fairly good description on the grounds that it is about kids (Traffaut) and has some fairly Fellini-esquire moments (noticeably, one scene where the children escape a police station because everyone in the station and on the street are frozen in time watching the snow fall). But it wouldn't be fair to neglect Theo Angeloupos (probably spelling error, sorry) own incredible style, one that still seems fresh after many years because of the films obscurity it has been scarcely imitated. The gorgeous photography (by Yorgos Arvanitis) strays almost completely from close ups - in fact, there may not be a single close up in the entire film.

The story centers on two children who run away from their single mother in search of a father her mother says lives in Germany. In reality, we hear her mother say in the beginning of the film, he does not exist. The older adolescent girl overhears this but refuses to believe it, and she takes her much smaller brother on a road trip to the north Greek border. Over one winter they wander through snowy landscapes starkly contrasted against the industrial cities and highways. They almost starve several times, they are occasionally pursued by police, at one point it is implied that the adolescent girl, Voula, is raped. At many times during their journey they encounter a friendly traveling theater actor who gives them rides. The whole film the children are searching for their father, the "Landscape in the Mist" - it can only exist if you imagine it. Sadly, Alexander and Voula do not accept the actor as a father figure, because their determined journey says their father is in Germany, not Greece. If only they had!...unfortunately, it would not have made a difference - the actor has been drafted into the Greek army.

Towards the end of the film they watch with amazement as a helicopter pulls a giant statue of a god-like hand out of large river and flies it towards the faraway city - I wouldn't be given this scene so shamelessly away if it weren't for the fact they show it in the poster anyway...the spoiler warning is also up. But it's really there for:

SPOILERS HERE

At the end of the film the Alexander (the boy) and Voula attempt to cross the Greek border by rowing a boat across the river. They are spotted from a watchtower and fired upon. The next morning, it seems they have crossed the river and are wandering through a hilly place where it is so misty they can hardly see ten yards ahead of them. A lone, leafless tree becomes visible and they wander towards it. The camera does not follow them. Fade to black. Have they successfully crossed the border? Have they been shot and died, and reached some kind of afterlife? It's not clear, but we celebrate their victory that they have finally discovered the impossible: a landscape in the mist.

THE SPOILERS ARE OVER...BUT SO IS THE REVIEW!
22 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A modern odyssey
julian_abadia11 July 2010
Landscape in the Mist is the tale of two Greek siblings (a girl and a boy) who one day decide to travel to Germany to search for his unknown father. Fifteen minutes into the film we learn that the father in question, doesn't real exist. In fact, we also learn from the children' uncle (her mother's brother) that it all has been a lie as the children are the result of different love affairs. In most conventional movies, this early discovery would ruin the plot, hence the rest of film, but here it becomes the turning point into the children' odyssey since it fuels up their desire to meet his father. From that towards, the film shows us thew siblings mixed up in the raw atmosphere of the adult world, surrounded by bleach landscapes and a misty never-ending who serves at the only witness for the children descend into adulthood. There, in the battlefield of an unknown world, our main characters encounter many challenges, but they all together manage the constant menace of a number of difficult situations, thanks in a part by a good natured youngster named Oreste. However, he is not always present for the children (due to their constant moving) and at the end, one has the feeling that after all, they are alone to face their fate; which in my opinion reflects the paradox of a new born child.

Landscape in the Mist is a piece of art, a masterpiece so well crafted that makes think about it even if you haven't watch it in years. It so powerful and yet so sad, like a misty sky in a rainy day. HIGHLY RECOMMENDABLE. IT WILL CHANGE YOUR LIFE
11 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A proud work
SilverDiamond19875 December 2009
To me, this is one of the greatest movies of all time. Art and a very touching and interesting story combine each other and create this masterpiece with some unforgettable scenes, images and a mesmerizing cinematography. At the beginning, we do not see the mother of the little sisters, only hear her voice. While watching this scene, I thought that it is to make us feel that the sisters are lonely, nobody cares about them, nobody worries about them. In another scene, the sisters visit a man who is probably one of their relatives. However, he looks disturbed when he sees them. The Petrifying truck scene is a story itself. This scene is horrible in terms of content, but enchanting in terms of cinema. And sharp realism. If there is a flaw in the movie, it is the final. It was obscure and not stunning as the rest of the movie. I mean the scene takes place at night. It could have been a bit different, less obscure. Instead of commenting the end of the movie, some say that it is one of the finals that everyone draws their own conclusion, but for such a content or story, it does not seem a good idea. By the way, always, especially critics say this is a story of getting conscious or growing in wisdom, if a movie is about a little girl or boy. Well, this is not actually, the movie is much more than that and much more different. And as you guess, no cliché. The older sister is conscious anyway. She is aware of everything like an adult, even if she sometimes falls. The both sisters are very courageous and at the same time naive. I wanted to help them in the times they need. However, the weather is cold, desolate ways. Unsafe and risky. The vehicles pass them carelessly and don't stop. Probably the best Angelopoulos movie.
12 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Truly mesmerizing
dylankudla1 January 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Buckle up because this review is a long and detailed one.

Plot summary "Landscape in the mist" is a movie about two children traveling from Greece to Germany to find a person who they think is their dad. They have to face the unforgiving reality of isolation, hostility, ideals- a world they don't yet understand and are not prepared for as well as nature's fussy landscapes. It's a piece about human nature, the world we created for ourselves and the unavoidable fall of Icarus (or maybe a successful journey, depends on how you interpret it). Nevertheless, it's a depressing yet hauntingly mesmerizing piece.

My interpretation- the overall part Theo Angelopoulos presents a world of isolation, with a heavy sky and dismembered nature. Rain pours almost constantly, as if it was meant to cleanse the earth in some way. It falls on the siblings more than it does on anyone else. We see a lot of machines, bland buildings, monotony; nothing stands out. None of this is meant for us to remember, it presents the duality- the human vs the machines. It makes the world seem and feel heavily dehumanized, the creator is a mere addition to the landscape they created. The monotony is increased by one and reoccurring music theme as well as desaturated color palette. It's enough to make the audience sick, however it's also enough to keep us watching the movie with a careful fascination. I see the father not as a person, but as an idea or a destination and children as us- humans. We all have something we believe despite of not having much evidence, we all are on a journey to somewhere, we don't even know if we're ever going to make it. Yet, just like the siblings, we are moving constantly. We may see children as naive but we're not that much different from them. I think the main conclusion I got from the movie can be summarized in eight words: the journey is more important than the destination.

My interpretation- the symbolism of certain scenes I'm going to express what I thought might bring the sense of my overall interpretation out and just things I have noticed and wanted to share. The scenes I will address are described in somewhat chronological order. Starting with the fact that we never see the mother of siblings. She's a single mother, we could expect her to have a bond with her children and to appear as a symbol of staidness, maybe even a safe place. We could also expect her to symbolize abuse and emotional absence or neglect on the other end of the spectrum. But she's pictured as none of these things, she's a neutral, almost invisible character, a ghost. She doesn't play any role in the decisions of children. Later in the movie, the girl mentions that they love her but the internal need to seek their father is far stronger. While the father is a real person to them, even though they had never seen him, the mother they see every day is a ghost. Next scene I will bring up is the one with a wedding and a dead lamb. Of course, the first thing that comes to mind of most people when they see a lamb and try to interpret it is Christian symbolism of Jesus and martyrdom. Wedding can also be symbolically traced to Christianity- to wedding at Cana. But I feel that here, it's not meant to represent Jesus but the pain and the relief. At the beginning we see that the bride runs out of the building crying and is brought back in by a man. Next, we see a tied up dying lamb. After its death, the boy weeps but behind his back, wedding guests storm out dancing accompanied by festive melody. It's a beautiful contrast. Considering my overall interpretation of the path, I feel that the death of the lamb means to represent the death of something in a person, something that was a burden weighing the person down. It's needed to move on. Relief, transformation. Then we can continue walking. After that we meet Orestes. He's genuine, charming, helpful. An oasis for the tired children. He serves as a faint father figure they never had. He doesn't turn them in to the police, doesn't push them to say too much, he understands there's more to their journey than a stranger sees. When he picked up the clean strip of film, he also wanted to see more, even if there was nothing to see at all, but his words created the landscape with the tree in the mist and puzzled the boy (I see this scene as an omen of their later death and the boy keeping the film as claiming the vision/ unconsciously giving in). His theater automatically brings the theatrum mundi motif in my mind and just like his acting career, life itself is mostly not a very successful quest. Not to most people. Not to the siblings. The theater itself is not where it should be, chairs and costumes on the beach is not something we see a lot (we ourselves are misplaced too). Another beach scene is even more dream-like. An empty caravan, table and chairs as well as spiral stairs leading to nowhere. It's a mesmerizing scene. The stairs- symbol of the journey and growth (or recession) make us aware that children are changing (the girl even mentions it in one of her letters) but for me, it's also a symbol of sudden change or death. The stairs stop so suddenly yet they seem so light. Just like our own interpretations of the things we go through; we're not always prepared. Orestes had faith in their theater. With the theatrum mundi in mind, the costumes may as well represent humanity of a person (just wanted to highlight that at the beginning, we're introduced to a seagull man. He reflects in the actual seagulls at the beach. He had a "costume" and it was his hospital jacket/shirt, his sense of humanity). The man knew that selling them would be equal to admitted to the defeat, the end and selling one's humanity. That's why he called it "a funeral" and walked away. Orestes also witnessed a great artificial hand resurfacing before him from the sea. It can symbolize the hand of god or destiny as well as the lost humanity and hope. It flies away carried by a helicopter. During his last encounter with the children, he knows he won't see them again, but he hopes they will make it. The girl breaks down, maybe she accepts the abysmal reality of hopelessness and the absurdity of her destination. Maybe she's just so tired and mad and exhausted from the constant journey. But she and her brother wander into the night once again. That's where they leave Orestes. Nearing towards the end, the girl asks the soldier for the money so she can buy a ticket. They never had tickets before, never had enough money to buy one and yet they were able to travel, just in a slower manner. In my personal opinion, she's either too exhausted or she knows she doesn't have much time left. We see that the kids don't have passports, they know they won't be let into the country. They know they have to sneak in and they're aware of how dangerous that is. Finally, they get into the boat and I can't help but think of Chiron and the Styx. One of them mentioned how "Germany is just across that river", just like Hades is across the Styx from the land of the living. With the gunshot sound, we're even more sure of what's happening, even though the only thing we can see is complete darkness. It cuts to the boy reciting the same biblical story as his sister told him at the beginning ("In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. And God said, Let there be light: and there was light."). When she said it first, they were laying in bed, at home and there was darkness around them. When he mentions it now, they're in the white fog, they're in light. There's only one tree in the frame, could either represent the one tree God forbid eating from in Eden (if we want to go with the Christian symbolism), so knowledge, self-awareness, probably the truth or it can represent eternity, stability, life (as in Nordic culture for example). Either way, children run to it. They're at peace. Their journey came to the end. Many people will say they reached their destination, many will say they didn't but I say that it doesn't really matter. The journey is the only thing that had the meaning, value and was true.

My thoughts I loved the movie; it was visually stunning. The weight of the nature and surroundings was just perfectly overwhelming. The plot itself, without interpretation, is not cliché, you don't expect a movie about children runaways to have this kind of things happening. The music is not too distracting. My emotional response was pretty muted but it brought my heart down in an unavoidable way. Theo Angelopoulos mastered the art of visible but not too in-your-face symbolism while leaving the space for mundane scenes. I definitely recommend it, it was the first movie I had the internal need to write about, it definitely has a place in my favorites now.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Harsh world of adults experienced and seen by innocent children in a landmark film by Theo Angelopoulos.
FilmCriticLalitRao30 September 2014
The genius of great Greek director Theo Angelopoulos is evident in all his films.They are known for their trademark long shots and other visual compositions which help viewers get close to the characters. What makes "Landscapes in the mist" an important film is its focus on showing two innocent children as mature human beings who experience and see both evil and good side of adults with their own eyes.Although this film has been structured as a road movie,in a very strict sense it isn't one as too many breaks are taken by Voula and her brother Alexander whose only aim in life is to be able to meet their father in Germany.The maturity which these children possess is the result of a series of painful processes during which they experience deceit,love,rejection and separation.It is true that much information has not been shared behind this film's origins,it can be surmised that it is autobiographical in nature.Lastly,the depiction of a few good men such as Orestis would go a long way in our appreciation of humanity at a time when innumerable crimes are being committed against children.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Another flawed occasionally brilliant film
ruedevariance15 July 2012
Landscape in the Mist is the third in a Trilogy of Silence that began with Voyage to Cythera and continued with The Bee-Keeper. In all three films the qualities that distinguished the first trilogy -Days of '36, The Travelling Players, and The Hunters- are absent. The music in the first trilogy is precise and precisely used at key moments of the film; whereas in the second trilogy the music is repetitive and not traditionally Greek but some sort of middle European slop which heard again and again becomes an irritating nuisance and a diversion from the film. The music in Megalexandros is even more important and deftly used. Second, the cinematography in the first trilogy and Megalexandros is pristine and superb in its use of Northern Greek landscape, whereas in the second trilogy, with the exception of the closing scenes of Voyage to Cythera and Landscape in the Mist, the landscape rarely works as a commentary other than, perhaps the empty roads in Landscape in the Mist. Third, the introduction of Tonino Guerra as writer complicates the vision Angelopoulos had before, giving his films an existential despair familiar from Antonionio's films on which Guerra wrote, and which are part of the problem. The unreality of two children who rarely eat or drink or wash may not matter as they represent a transition from innocence to maturity, but the adults around them are by turns indifferent (the uncle), brutal (the truck driver), loving (Orestes) but seem not to contribute anything to the children's lives, other than the obvious problem of the truck scene. Perhaps in this film the father's silence is equivalent to God's silence, yet the solitary tree at the end suggests the eternal spring of life, and that the children have found their peace. What a pity this ravishing scene is so polluted by that whining oboe and that relentless repetition of such third rate muzak.

I have the Artificial Eye Boxed sets, and all the films seem to be missing up to 5-15 minutes, are there no definitive versions of Angelopoulos' films?
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A poetic Odyssey of two Greek children
CynthiaMargaretWebb15 January 2017
LANDSCAPE IN THE MIST (1988) Directed by Theo Angelopoulos Today I watched this 1988 masterpiece from the late Theo Angelopoulos. (January, 2017). It won the Silver Lion at Venice Film Festival, and many other awards.(see list on IMDb). It's an exquisite allegorical tale and perhaps knowledge, or lack of it, about modern Greek history could determine what you think it might be about. I have my own ideas as do reviewers before me,here on IMDb.

I love the way this maestro director has used a sort of Odyssey (what could be more appropriate?) by two young siblings, (Voula, aged 14 and her brother Alexander, aged 5) traveling Greece in search of someone (or something) they want to believe exists, just to "understand and know but not to stay," the older girl says. This is a film that is not about what it appears to be about, but is an allegory and a poem, a work of visual art, and profound emotional truth. The visual power and beauty, the gorgeous music (by Eleni Karaindrou), every frame on screen, are all spell-binding. To me, each scene and episode in their young lives on this journey through Greece to find the landscape in the mist, can be linked to the story of the Greek nation and its people. The landscape in the mist is tellingly, first seen on a few frames of 35mm movie film found in the muddy street by their young motor-cyclist mentor... a kind of guiding angel travelling with them for a time. Perhaps he can only see it on the celluloid because he is searching for this mythic landscape (or condition) too. This piece of "found film" serves to link the director himself into the collective experience of all the Greeks. Perhaps it's the modern day "Golden Fleece"? What a gorgeous and poetic film. Almost as beautiful as the same director's "The Weeping Meadow" - one of my all time most admired works of art in cinema.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
In the beginning, there was only darkness. Then light appeared.
barkincelakil11 February 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Two children who set out to find their father, whom they think is in Germany, first board a train to Germany. After being handed over to the police for not having a ticket, the two children are taken to their uncle, who informs them that they are in fact the product of an illegitimate relationship and that they do not have a father in Germany. Taken to the police station, the children manage to escape from the police while they are outside watching the snow. Time has stopped, no one is moving except the children. As they continue their escape, they are confronted by the troupe of actors from the director's 1975 film "O thiasos". We suddenly find ourselves in the lines from that movie. The troupe is still traveling. One of the children, a girl, is raped by a driver who picks her up. When they use a boat on the river to cross the border, they are shot at and a tree emerges out of the haze. In the end, it is this tree that they find, not their father. Despite its flaws, this movie can be considered one of Angelopoulos' masterpieces.

7.5/10.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The Left Elbow Index
eldino3317 November 2009
Alas, The Left Index has met its match. Usually, the index concerns seven variables when considering a film--acting, production scenes, dialogue, plot, character development, artistry, and continuity--on a scale ranging from a high of 10 to a low of 1. Generally, a mix of rating results in some score which demonstrates the strong and weak points in a film. With this film, every variable is ranked a 10, simply because the film is sensational in all areas. The film is powerful, intense and spellbinding. Everything is related to everything else, which, in effect, results in an organic whole which is seldom achieved in film. The acting is connected with the decisions the two children make as the travel to Germany, even not knowing where it is or what it is. They constantly have to decide whom to trust, how to avoid dangers, or which way is north. The production scenes are unparalleled, especially the snow scene at the police station, the horse and wedding in the town square, and the motorcycle rally. There are dozens of others just as good. The plot is propelled by constant dramatic action, which gradually intensifies towards the conclusion. Not matter what the viewer is prepared for, there are continual unexpected events which reinforce the plot. Character development is superb, as the children become both wiser and more experienced as they near their goal. Dialogue is sparse, words are spoken only when necessary, and some scenes are wordless. After all, film is a medium where one sees things happen. The films strongest point is in the combination of continuity and artistry. In a word, it is surreal in the classical manner of Salvadore Dali and Pablo Picasso. One is especially cognizant of Dali's "Persistance of Memory" in terms of the wide expanses of space. In fact, Theo Angelopoulos employs the three element of 20th century surrealism--land, sky, and water--very effectively. There are obvious allusions to Picasso's "Saltimbasques" with the traveling theater. Angelopoulos' illusion to the hand of God from the Sistine Chapel is unmistakable, especially with the missing finger which symbolizes human contact with salvation. All in all, The Left Elbow Index rates the film a 10-plus. I strongly recommend this film. Aristotle would have loved it. I think you will, too.
7 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A hazy dreamscape of timespan and personal growth
tonosov-512384 March 2024
Creating a remarkably bizarre journey that inexplicably commits to the surrealistic dream logic yet keeps the stark contrast of the harsh and dour reality of how two delusional and unprepared children crossing a whole country searching for a father that doesn't exist would feasibly look like.

It's rough, but the children will persist.

Together with the fairy tale that the sister describes in the beginning, bizarre occurrences will seep into their journey. It becomes quite obvious that it's not going to be a down-to-earth road movie. It even has its own version of a knight on an armored horse, but unfortunately for the sister, even there, her hopes are to be dashed against grim reality. The kids are genuinely great. And many scenes must have been very difficult to direct with them, especially that one scene.

In fact, the movie is so visually depressing, with a great deal of long shots of industrial, run-down, rustic scenery in Greece, that you wouldn't be ungrounded to think that the primary theme the director tries to communicate is how depressing the country is and how everyone wants to get out of there, to the point of creating a fairy tale to motivate themselves, and how the country's history and identity are relegated to a bunch of 'remember-when' conversations. But it's not about that, at least I hope. Their wayfaring is just a personification of how, on our journey through time, not everything is going to make sense, and if you quell the rationality to dismiss everything nonsensical you encounter on this path, you might... actually, here I fall silent because I don't think the movie even remotely pretends it had an end destination.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Misty eyes. Because I was bored to tears.
Burningfield16 February 2018
I saw this film in a local movie theatre around 30 years ago. And it is true. I am an ignorant. I didn't understand much of it.

I don't remember much now either, except being bored to insanity and beyond by the pretentious blabbering, wriggling in my chair, hoping that the gorgeous and probably smarter girl in the seat beside me wouldn't understand that I was too stupid for this movie, knowing that some cultural highbrow jerk would describe it as "marvelous, fantastic, beautiful" or, even more likely, use other words that I probably wouldn't understand either.

Long. So long. How long can a movie be?

On our way out of the theatre, probably after around two and a half months in the seat, I heard a woman dressed in her elitist, purple uniform talk about the "pretty landscape and the use of light". Then I knew that she hadn't understood anything either, but was never going to tell anyone.

I am however thankful. I survived. It didn't kill me outright, even if it scarred me for life. Which is why I am doubling the score.

Avoid, unless you have a potential partner to impress and are willing and able to serve your time in the chair to reap a possible reward afterwards. Remember comfy pants.

But I never even got the girl. I told you she was smart.
8 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed