Dirty Rotten Scoundrels (1988) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
205 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
whatever happened to the funny comedies of the '80s?
blanche-218 March 2014
Dirty Rotten Scoundrels is a wonderful '80s comedy, the type we don't see any longer. Today the humor, for the most part, is vulgar. For some reason, in the '80s, comedies were actually funny.

Michael Caine and Steve Martin are two con man who wind up competing on the Riviera. Caine is a classy con man, Lawrence Jamieson, targeting rich widows as he sports different accents claiming he's funding a revolution for his country, helping the poor, the hungry, etc. Martin is Freddy Benson, lower class but after the same targets.

Freddy asks Lawrence to tutor him in the art of the high-class con. Freddy doesn't want him around as he feels the Riviera isn't big enough for both of them. Freddy, however, isn't leaving. So they agree on a bet. The first one to strip a young heiress (Glenne Headly) of $50,000 stays, and the other leaves.

What follows is hilarious. Both men are at the top of their game here. Steve Martin can make you laugh with a facial expression. The scene where he attempts to "walk" after being in a wheelchair is a riot. Caine as Lawrence is brilliant as a suave sophisticate, and his getting the better of Freddy in several scenes is a delight. The end has a neat twist.

This film was adapted into a successful Broadway musical, and it is opening in London starring Robert Lindsay ("My Family"). It's a fun story. Wish today we had more like this.
26 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A delightful exercise in farcical chicanery
rupie30 August 1999
I cannot believe that the first time I saw this - one of my favorite comedies - I was not enamored of it. Subsequent viewings have given it an honored place on my roster of great comedies. What fun Caine and Martin must have working with each other on this one; their enthusiasm certainly shows in the results. Best line: "One must know one's limitations, Freddy. You are a moron." Definitely a must-see for comedy aficionados.
41 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Winning Comedy from the Land of Oz
jhclues6 March 2002
Director Frank Oz landed the dream team from comedic heaven when Steve Martin and Michael Caine signed on to star in this hilarious comedy of manners and mannerisms, `Dirty Rotten Scoundrels,' a film that manages to be entertaining without being offensive in any way, and features some terrific performances and-- filmed on location in the French Riviera-- some beautiful cinematography by Michael Ballhaus. Made in 1988, this film not only holds up well, but seems so refreshing after a decade of `American Pies' and other such fare featuring one witless, forgettable `talent' after another. It's a reminder that true comedy can have sophistication without necessarily being sophisticated, and that real humor is timeless. This is stuff that was good when it was made, is even better today, and will have you laughing even harder at it twenty, thirty or fifty years from now.

Freddy Benson (Martin) is a small time American con man/aspiring gigolo traveling abroad with his sights set on the Riviera, specifically Beaumont Sur Mer, which he understands is easy pickings for a talent such as his. Why, on the train into town alone, he bilks a compassionate young woman out of dinner and twenty dollars, using the old I'm-saving-up-for-my-dear-old-grandmother's-operation ploy. On that same train, however, observing Freddy's operation from across the aisle, is Lawrence Jamieson (Caine), a big time con artist/gigolo, who as it happens, lives in Beaumont Sur Mer. And instantly, Jamieson looks upon Freddy with disdain; after all, this is a man who has perfected the art of bilking rich young women for sums that fall into five and six digits by successfully masquerading as a Prince or some such Nobility, who needs vast sums of money in order to `save' his country from the Communists, an unspecified opposition, or whatever else will work. Furthermore, it's taken a lot of time and effort to get to where he's at, and he's not about to let the unseemly Freddy Benson cut into his act.

So with the help of his associate ( a local policeman), Inspector Andre (Anton Rodgers), Jamieson sets out to `discourage' Freddy from attempting to get a foothold in Beaumont Sur Mer. But Freddy, it turns out, may not be the unwitting amateur Jamieson presumed him to be-- Andre has just received word that an elusive con artist has arrived in the area; a professional known only as `The Jackal.' And so, the game is afoot; a game that will ultimately bring Jamieson and Freddy closer together, and involve them with a wealthy American named Janet Colgate (Glenne Headly), who will become the focus of more than just a little attention before it's all over. it becomes a contest between the suave Lawrence Jamieson and the unruly Freddy Benson. And the winner? Well, by the end it's clear who the real winner is here-- and without a doubt, it's the audience.

Oz must have had a good time making this movie, because he had all the tools available to him from the best of both worlds. There's the broad, physical humor employed and perfectly delivered by Martin, and the subtle, studied approach that Caine uses. Their styles contrast wonderfully, and Oz certainly makes the most of it. He's put together some scenes that are beyond hilarious, like the one in which Lawrence attempts tutoring Freddy in the art of being suave and sophisticated; or when-- as part of a scam-- Freddy takes on the role of `Ruprecht,' Lawrence's incorrigible, moronic brother. It's in these scenes that Oz seems to give Martin, especially, some free reign, and the rewards are substantial. And it's definitely a joint effort on the part of the two stars; Martin is funny, but it's Caine's response to him that really makes it work. It also demonstrates that Oz knows his territory, and proceeds accordingly.

Caine gives a performance that presents Jamieson as the epitome of charm and experience, in the grand tradition of the likes of David Niven and Cary Grant. This is one smooth operator, and the fact that he lives by a personal `code' that only allows him to bilk the very rich (and only if they `deserve' it), enables you to like him for who and what he is. He's not a guy who's going to let a mark sell the family furniture and car to invest in one of his schemes; call him a con man with scruples. And Caine plays him to perfection.

Martin, however, is the one who really gets to cut loose in the role of Freddy, and without question, he does physical comedy better than anyone since Buster Keaton or Chaplin. Martin can get a laugh just by walking into a room. He invests Freddy with a less than retiring manner, and takes it over the top in his guise as Ruprecht, using his entire body as a vehicle through which he expresses this particular bit of lunacy. And seeing him in action is an absolute riot. As he did so successfully in his stand-up days, Martin parlays a facial expression combined with the most erratic movements of his arms and legs into a visual image that can be indescribably funny. He's one of the select few actor/comedians with a true and innate sense of real comedy, and moreover, he knows how to sell it to his audience.

As the seemingly hapless Janet, Headly does a good job, but it's a role that may have been more conducive to the likes of Melanie Griffith or even Diane Keaton, either of whom would've given the character a decidedly different spin.

The supporting cast includes Barbara Harris (Fanny), Ian McDiarmid (Arthur) and Dana Ivey (Mrs. Reed). Funny and thoroughly entertaining, `Dirty Rotten Scoundrels,' with it's contrasting comedic styles and polished presentation, is a minor classic in it's own right. A winner from the Land of Oz, wherein Caine and Martin are the reigning Royalty, this is one comedy that will definitely continue to withstand the test of time. 8/10.
51 out of 62 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6.7?
estaismuybuenas30 April 2003
How on earth did this movie get a 6.7 on the ratings scale? Read the comments, this is one of the funniest and most intelligent comedies ever, remake or not. When you can watch a film 20, 30 times and still find it funny 15 years after it was first released how is that not a classic?
66 out of 70 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not as consistently funny as I expected, but mostly amusing, and it eventually gets better
Beta_Gallinger24 May 2010
This crime comedy, released when I was only two years old, didn't catch my attention until VERY recently, around the time I watched "Bowfinger" for the first time in years this month. That film was directed by Frank Oz and features Steve Martin as one of the two co-stars, just like this one. That was how I discovered "Dirty Rotten Scoundrels", a remake of a 1964 film called "Bedtime Story", which I've never seen. In fact, I watched this 1988 film not knowing it was based on any picture that was made before it. I was expecting this movie to be at least slightly better than "Bowfinger", even though that 1999 comedy is pretty funny, but my expectations may have been a little too high. For a while, I was getting disappointed, but fortunately, this didn't last.

Freddy Benson and Lawrence Jamieson are two con artists who make a living out of swindling rich women. After a successful operation, Lawrence is on a train on his way back to Beaumont-sur-Mer, France, where he currently resides. It is during this train ride when he first meets Freddy, after watching him bilking a woman by making up a story about having a very sick grandmother. Freddy happens to be on his way to Beaumont-sur-Mer, and Lawrence thinks he might have competition if the two of them are in the same town together, so at the station, he tricks Freddy into staying on the train. However, it isn't long at all before Lawrence sees his rival in town again, and Freddy soon learns that the two of them have the same profession. He gets Lawrence to agree to teach him his conning skills by threatening to expose him if he doesn't. Their rivalry continues to the point where they make a bet. They will see which one of them will be to first to cheat a certain woman out of $50,000, and the loser will leave town.

Freddy is the character Steve Martin plays, and Lawrence is played by Michael Caine. Lawrence is the first of the two leads to appear in the film. The beginning, showing this character just before he meets the other con artist, is not hilarious but sometimes mildly amusing, and Caine already shows his acting talent. Freddy then makes his first appearance on the train, and the first really funny part is here, with the character telling the story of his sick grandmother and then making a massive order of food which his victim has promised to pay for. After this, the movie is not always that funny, but often is, especially with the antics of Martin, in scenes such as the jail cell one, in which his character struggles to try and remember Lawrence's name. I didn't care much for the scene showing Lawrence talking to one of his victims before he introduces her to Freddy posing as Ruprecht, though I did find the part where Freddy's mentally challenged alter ego is introduced funny, even if some are bound to find it offensive. There also might be a lot of subtle humour which I didn't get. Still, there are lots of funny parts, and it gets better later on, with Freddy posing as a traumatized soldier and Lawrence posing as a psychiatrist. At this point, it gets funnier and also a bit more exciting.

I already mentioned that I haven't seen "Bedtime Story", the 1964 comedy starring Marlon Brando and David Niven, which this 1988 film is based on. Even though remakes are often inferior to originals, I obviously don't know how these two in particular compare, but I guess I'm not the only one who has seen "Dirty Rotten Scoundrels" but not "Bedtime Story", since this film seems to be more widely recognized today. I'm sure I will see the original someday, but in the meantime, I will say that overall, this remake is a funny crime comedy, and the two leads actors, Steve Martin and Michael Caine, are both very impressive in their roles, even if Martin is the one who provides most of the humour. The supporting cast is mostly good as well. A lot of people probably like this movie better than "Bowfinger", and I can't say I'm one of them, but I would say both of them are pretty funny and worth watching if you're a fan of the co-stars.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Hilarious and Clever!
jcanettis21 April 2004
What a film! "Dirty Rotten Scoundrels" has a really clever plot, in which Lawrence, a high-class playboy (Michael Caine), and Freddy, a petty con man (Steve Martin), make their living by seducing and cheating rich ladies. However, the little French town is too small for both, so they decide to set up a bet in which the loser has to clear the area. Pretty and naive Janet (Glenn Headly) is the object of their contest, and each one of them engages in ever-more ingenious tricks to try to rip her off and win the bet, yet with unpredictable results.

The movie is hilarious, and despite its 15 years' of age, it is as fresh as it has been when it was first produced. Steve Martin of course is the funniest character of all, with his fantastic "Ruprecht" performance being unforgettable. Go ahead and enjoy this film. It is worth it! 9/10.
84 out of 90 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A funny idea that for me just didn't get funny enough to take off
secondtake24 March 2013
Dirty Rotten Scoundrels (1988)

Such two opposite types of actors, and characters, for a scamming grifter type of movie you'll never see again. And I think that's what supposed to hold the movie up throughout, and it survives itself pretty well, despite some uneven acting and an air of chummy ease among all the actors, as if they know they're making a disposable movie in some posh locations.

I thought I would like this movie more. Steve Martin is such a funny actor and he gets to play a zany American type in his own way really well. Michael Caine is a hugely versatile actor and one of my favorites, and he's a sort of restrained cad in a fun way. But they don't really make any magic happen together, and the plot, which depends on being clever and full of twists, isn't all that clever or twisty.

Yes it's fun. It's enjoyable. But leave it at that.
9 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Dirty + Rotten = Genius
slokes23 December 2003
This film made an impression on me before I even saw it. I was in a theater, and a trailer for "Dirty Rotten Scoundrels" came on. While a voice-over talked about the value of movies promoting morality and civility, you saw Martin and Caine strolling along a beachfront, smiling beneficently as they greet passers-by. Then Caine shoved cotton candy into a kids face while Martin pushed a woman off a ledge.

It's a great sequence, and is featured on the DVD with its own commentary from director Frank Oz (when has that ever happened before?) but a little misleading. Actually, while both men are scoundrels, neither is quite that vile. Caine's Lawrence Jamieson is actually a bit of an altruist, as we find out, with a code of only taking in people who can afford to be taken, and finding ways of spending the money that are not entirely self-serving. Martin's Freddy Benson is less disciplined and more small-time in his cons; he'll steal candy from a baby and tell you it's for his poor sick Gram-Gram if caught, but he is likeable, too, an underdog with little idea how the game is played at the highest levels, but eager to learn.

The fact you can like these characters is a compliment to Martin and Caine, as well as director Oz and the team of writers. Tone is everything with a film like this, and as Oz says in his commentary, so important in making the comedy work. He notes he was going for a 1950s feel in the picture, I'm guessing with Hitchcock's "To Catch A Thief" in mind. The great score by Miles Goodman is solid enough to deserve its own CD reissue, with an air of light sophistication that buoys the proceedings on screen. Most importantly, since much of the comedy involves people taking advantage of one another, having everything put forward in such a gossamer manner helps you digest the story without leaving a bad taste.

Martin shines in many scenes, especially when playing Ruprecht the idiot man-child and when stuck in jail trying to remember the name of the only man he thinks can bail him out ("James Lawrenceton...no, wait, James Jesterton....no, no, it's definitely, um...") I knew Martin could be funny, and with the exception of "All Of Me" this is probably his best comedic performance, but Caine is a revelation. A straight man, yes, but with delicate timing and some clever characterizations that he pulls out of a bag, like an Germanic psychiatrist with some unusual ideas about curing lameness. You forget how good Caine is in comedy, despite his performances in films like this, "Blame It On Rio," and "Without A Clue." Glenne Headly is a revelation as the woman caught in the middle of Jamieson and Benson's scheming, every bit as good as her male counterparts, but say no more.

Great actors, great tone, but the plot is the best thing this film has. It's a remake of a 1964 film "Bedtime Story," which teamed Marlon Brando and David Niven for what should have been a dream team but went flat instead. This time, the script is helped by actors who can not only deliver funny lines but make them funnier, and by an ending (according to Oz in his commentary, one worked out over several long dinner meetings with Martin) that is simply perfect.

Finally, Oz needs to be recognized. He was only making his second non-Muppet film here, but the result in my view is one of the best comedies anyone has ever done. He manages to get the best from everyone, including the actors and cinematographer Michael Ballhaus (some amazing night shots of the French Rivera waterfront you never tire of looking at), and delivers a rare jewel of a film, a laugh-out-loud comedy that leaves you with a warm feeling inside.

Ian McDairmid plays Arthur the butler in this, teaming him with Oz yet again. Almost titled this review "Yoda And Palpatine On The French Riviera;" it's interesting McDairmid plays the one guy in "Scoundrels" who's really on the level.
110 out of 120 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Smart and pleasant
fletch55 November 2000
"Dirty Rotten Scoundrels" turned out to be a very good comedy of two rivalling swindlers in the French Riviera. Caine and Martin are excellent actors who play together superbly, supplementing each other. Beautifully filmed locales and the nice mood of the film add to the pleasant easiness of watching this smart and well-written movie.
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Hilarious!
ReelCheese21 June 2006
Everything clicks in this laugh-out-loud gem. Steve Martin and Michael Caine are in top form as Freddy Benson and Lawrence Jamieson, two con men who agree that this town (on the French Mediterranean coast) ain't big enough for the both of them. To solve the problem, they agree upon a solution - the first man to swindle $50,000 from a naive young woman gets to stay. The competition brings out the very best of their very worst, with Martin posing as a paraplegic and Caine as a psychiatrist eager to help convince him it's all in his head. Glenne Headly, as the target of the cons, deserves special mention for her brilliant performance.

One of the strongest assets of "Dirty Rotten Scoundrels" is that the story is interesting enough, with its various twists and turns, that it would work great even without being funny. The laughs - and there are many of them - are a sort of gut-hurting bonus. The scene in which Caine tests the nerves in Martin's legs must rank as one of the most uproarious in film history. This one from director Frank Oz (certainly no slouch in the comedy department) is not to be missed.
65 out of 71 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Light-hearted comedy at its best.
lexingtone16 May 2003
I managed to see this haphazourdly as the Late Movie one Friday. I have to admit, I'm usually not a fan of Steve Martin's strand of comedy (sorry fans :(), but I quite liked Dirty Rotten Scoundrels. The characters were interesting, the story-line quite unique and the humour consistently funny. I loved the character of Ruprecht (apologies for spelling) but also Martin's over-the-top performance as the troubled soldier. The constant tug-of-war between Caine's debanoir conman and Martin's cheesy overdone con were really terrific. Don't be hesitant. I admit it's not a flick I wouldn't usually see either, but it was fantastic none-the-less. 8 out of 10 :)
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A master class in con artist movies
cricketbat24 May 2019
This film brings me so much happiness. From the story to the comedy to the soundtrack, I enjoy all of it. It's the kind of silly movie you need to watch every now and then. It's amazing to me that, after having not watched it for many years, I can still quote almost every line. Steve Martin and Michael Caine make a fantastic duo, and Glenne Headly plays so well opposite them. Dirty Rotten Scoundrels is a master class in con artist movies.
18 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A comedy gem from the late 1980s...
paul_haakonsen7 January 2022
The 1988 comedy "Dirty Rotten Scoundrels" from writers Dale Launer, Stanley Shapiro and Paul Henning is certainly a late 1980s classic comedy. And it is one of those types of comedies that you can watch again and again.

And that is made possible not only because the writers managed to compile a wholesome and entertaining story, nay, it is also because of some stellar performances by the cast in the movie. With the likes of Steve Martin, Michael Caine and Glenne Headly by the helm, then you are in for a great movie, and they really carry the movie quite well.

The story told in "Dirty Rotten Scoundrels" is funny and well-written, as the narrative is great and the movie actually has a twist to it. And there is an abundance of comedy throughout the movie, which the cast delivers phenomenally well. And also the character gallery and the dialogue in the movie was just well-written.

I have enjoyed "Dirty Rotten Scoundrels" a handful of times since 1988, and it is a movie that definitely has enough contents to it to support more than just a single viewing.

My rating of director Frank Oz's 1988 comedy "Dirty Rotten Scoundrels" lands on a well-deserved seven out of ten stars.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Waste of great actors
Maziun13 July 2013
This movie is a remake of 60's comedy with Marlon Brando and David Niven. I haven't seen the original , so I don't have any comparison . I don't know is it better or worse . I'm sure that Michael Caine and Steve Martin are worthy successors . The movie however ? Hmmmmm… I don't know . I think it's overrated . I was expecting a lot more.

The screenplay pretends to be clever , but it isn't . Most of the jokes are forced and I felt like the movie was wasting the talents of both Caine and Martin . Still , they both give solid performances despite the lack of true chemistry between them. The story itself doesn't have any twists that you could expect from a movie about con-artists . It also lacks heart , despite writers intentions to send some morality message.

I was surprised by Glenne Headly as Janet Colgate . In some ways she steals the show from Caine and Martin . Her character is very natural , good , and delicate . She has some charm that makes her different from stereotypical naive woman.

"Dirty rotten scoundrels" tries to imitate the feel of 60's movie . In my opinion it's a fruitless attempt. It simply didn't felt like a 60's movie . It also doesn't feels like a 80's movie . "DRS" lacks soul.

It's not a bad movie . It was quite pleasant ride for me . Unfortunately , aside from Ruprecht I wasn't laughing out loud . I was more like grinning from time to time . I think they could do more with this movie . I give it 5/10.
11 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dr. Schuffhausen - Brilliant!
digitalpresence13 November 1999
It brings tears to my eyes seeing the resolve of "Freddie" (Steve Martin), the jilted-paralyzed vet, getting whacked on the run by Con Man-buddy "Dr. Schuffhausen" (Michael Caine). You can hear the swooshing of the silky satin suit as the Dr. backs up, antelopes towards Freddie, and positively cracks his shins with the sting of a whip-like stem. The look on Steve Martin's face as he fights the tears to preserve his character is priceless!
23 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Cads on the razz
Lejink20 January 2012
Highly amusing and very pretty to look at comedy with Caine and Martin vying for the undisputed "King Con" rights to a Mediterranean resort peopled by a seemingly never-ending stream of filthy-rich and extremely gullible American women just desperate to give away their money and more to the first silver-tongued devil they encounter.

Beautifully shot in the scenic Italan Riviera, the script is a gift for Mchael Caine as the reigning number one upper-class smooth operator whose dominion is challenged by young punk Steve Martin's new kid on the block. Initially mentor and protégé, during which sequence Martin gets to tribute the Three Stooges, Harpo Marx and Jerry Lewis, they naturally later fall out and become rivals in a competition to dupe a supposedly warm-hearted but dim American heiress, well played by Glenne Headly.

Plenty of laughs ensue, particularly when Martin adopts a crippled war veteran disguise with an aversion to dancing (cue reprise of "The Jerk's" "Happy Feet" scene) with Caine effortlessly playing the straight man to good effect. Occasionally Martin, as is his wont, overdoes the improv and anyway how come he's billed above Caine in the titles but apart from a predictable-from-twenty-miles-out twist at the end, this was for me a bright, likable comedy directed with élan by Frank Oz.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The Changes Improve the Film
theowinthrop2 August 2006
Warning: Spoilers
In 1964 Marlon Brando made the film BEDTIME STORY with David Niven and Shirley Jones, about the battle between two rival con-artists on the Riviera, to determine who was going to be the local king of the racket in running the town. It was a good comedy, but while it demonstrated (as TEAHOUSE OF THE AUGUST MOON had) that Brando was an accomplished comic when he wanted to be, somehow it was not as good as it could have been. Yet Brando, Niven, and Jones did excellent work in it.

The film was remade in 1988 as DIRTY ROTTEN SCOUNDRELS, with the leads played by Steve Martin, Michael Caine, and Glenne Headley. The general feeling is that if the original was a good comedy, the remake was all-around an excellent one.

Brando's "Freddy Benson" ran a small con-game racket pretending to be a soldier trying to get money for his grandmother's operation in the U.S. Brando would target young American ladies who were traveling on trains on the Italian - French border, and take them for small sums. But he hoped to go after richer game. The richer game were targeted by Niven's "Lawrence Jamieson", who got large sums from wealthy women who were willing to finance a counter-revolution in a fictitious country he is exiled king of. Niven, of course, does not want competition. He tries to work with Brando for awhile, but Brando strains at the restraint of his distinctly junior partner position. So they agree to a con-artist test on the first subject that comes along: whoever takes her for $10,000.00 will be the winner. Along comes Jones' who they think is the heiress to a soap fortune, and they go after her. In the end, she is not an heiress, and Brando and she go back to America as husband and wife. Niven resigns himself to the sad lonely life of the elite on the Riviera.

SPOILERS COMING UP The 1988 version changed the characterizations a bit. Niven sees himself as a patron of the arts, because he was not very good in any of them but now has the money to help support people. Caine does too, but his interest is more controlled - more of a hobby really. He is an organized conman and he has set up a first rate system with his valet and the local police chief. Martin's "Freddie" is far dumber and sloppier than Brando's. He practices the same con-games, and tries to rise above that nonsense, but he lacks any grace to do so. In fact, he blackmails his way into Caine's establishment to become a gentleman conman, and is kept only as an idiot. So was Brando, but Brando was intelligent to see he was being wasted. Martin is just demanding.

Certain things were improved by the changes. Shirley Jones was a total innocent who was brought into the Caine - Martin rivalry as a dupe. Glenne Headley's character is more devious, as it turns out, and improves the atmosphere of plot, counter-plot, counter - counter-plot that runs the script. It also enables the conclusion of the story to involve all three principals instead of just one (Caine in place of Niven). And, as it turns out, Headley has as low an opinion of Martin's intelligence as Caine does, even if they will be working together.
22 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Con Artists.
AaronCapenBanner26 November 2013
Frank Oz directed this clever comedy that stars Steve Martin & Michael Caine as two con artists on the French Mediterranean Coast who continuously bump into each other, interfering with each others plans. They then decide to settle things by making a bet: the first one to make a successful con on tourist Janet Colgate(played by Glenne Headly) will be the winner, and the loser will leave the country. They still team up to fool her with various disguises and schemes, but not everything is as it seems, leading to a memorable twist ending. Both Martin and Caine give funny performances, and work well together. Viewer may be uneasy rooting for these crooks, but it all works out well in the end.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
In A Word: Hilarious!
ccthemovieman-127 January 2007
I really don't watch this movie often enough. The few times I've seen it over the years provide superior entertainment, but it's a film I seem to forget about. That shouldn't be the case: it's a terrific movie.

I've never met anyone who did NOT like this movie. It seems to appeal to a lot of people, young and old. The three leads - Steve Martin, Michael Caine and Glenn Headley - were all in top form, on top of their "game," so to speak.

Martin's facial expressions and physical humor are terrific and Caine played his part magnificently, too. I enjoy Caine much more in here than Martin (and in most films) but Steve seems to have the funniest moments in this movie. At any rate, both are superb as antagonists "Lawrence Jamison" (Caine) and "Freddie Benson" (Martin). The two men have the talent to pull off slapstick as well as subtle comedy. Headley, as "Janet Colgate," meanwhile, is a joy to watch and to listen to, with that sweet voice of hers. I can't say more about her without giving away too much but she is not only the objection of attention in the movie, but the key character. These three combine for almost a laugh-a-minute.

This also is a good example of how to make a modern-day comedy without all the sleaze and profanity. There is some in here, but not much. Why most comedies do not follow this lead is a sad question. It's still an adult movie about con men, not a film teens and below would enjoy. Frank Oz, who directed other pretty clean-and-funny movies, directed this one.

Highly recommended.
63 out of 75 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Duelling interplay between Steve Martin and Michael Caine
fredrikgunerius6 August 2023
There is occasionally a balletic elegance to the duelling interplay between Steve Martin's brash hustler and Michael Caine's sophisticated con artist in this 1988 remake of Bedtime Story directed by Frank Oz. The perpetual and borderline exhausting nature of the setup is alleviated by well-placed shifts in rhythm and power balance, which allow the film to stay one step ahead every time you think it has become too predictable and repetitive. Michael Caine's performance is surprisingly accomplished for such lightweight material. And Steve Martin delivers his expected routines, which will no doubt please his fans.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Don't Remake Hits. Remake Flops
boblipton25 September 2020
Michael Caine runs confidence games. He's so long-con that he he lives on a magnificent estate on the Riviera and has the local police chief on retainer. Steve Martin scams women out of a hundred francs in railway carriages. When Martin discovers what a pro Caine is, he blackmails him into teaching him the craft. Caine keeps trying to get rid of him, and they settle on Glenne Headley as the bet.

There aren't many remakes that are better than the original. There's a tendency to remake hits, and mechanically apply the techniques. In truth, great movies come along at great moments, and once that moment is gone, it's impossible to replicate it. Perhaps The Maltese Falcon is the best example of a remake that's better than the original. Whatever you may think of the two earlier versions -- and there's no doubt they have their strengths -- John Huston's first movie, Bogart's film that turned him into a true star, Mary Astor in one of her best roles, and Sidney Greenstreet in his screen debut, offer the audience something that had never been seen before Like first love, you can imitate it, but never recapture it.

Remakes of failures. are another matter. There's no need to recapture lightning in a bottle. Just get it right. The first version of this movie, BEDTIME STORY, has a big problem: Marlon Brando has no comedy chops. It also has an issue with the lingering effects of thirty years of the Production Code weighing on what is essentially a pre-code movie.

This movie suffers no such issues, and director Frank Oz lets his two stars drag their scams into peribathos. Caine makes a fine, impatient straight man to Martin's shenanigans -- although Dana Ivey, as one of their marks, gets some wonderful reaction shots -- and Miss Headley gives a wonderful two-toned performance. Some of the gags may be drawn out past the viewer's patience, but this is a wonderful comedy.
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Simple, straight forward, exactly what it presents itself as
Robert_duder12 March 2014
Warning: Spoilers
You may think from the title of my review that I didn't enjoy this movie. That couldn't be further from the truth. I thought Dirty Rotten Scoundrels was perfectly fun! I love Steve Martin, especially old school Steve Martin and this was the type of film that he was the King of in the eighties. This is absolutely made for him and showcases his awkward, quirky character comedy like fans of his look for. The only issue with the film (and maybe its not an issue at all) is that it is a by the book con-man comedy. You can read the back of the movie, look at the cover, and you know exactly what you're in for right down to the T. There are no surprises. Although the film has a fairly big twist in the end, I actually figured it out before the reveal and its a fun twist and absolutely made me smile but the film plants itself firmly in a neat little genre box and doesn't ever try to go outside of that for any reason. For fans of this genre or either Martin or Caine then you will absolutely love this movie. I thoroughly enjoyed it! I just didn't get anything extraordinary out of it either. It was decent and I would watch it again. The gags are well placed and almost entirely in conjunction with the con angle.

Steve Martin is absolutely perfectly Steve Martin in this. I love Martin, he is one of my favourite SNL/80's slapstick comedians and this is what he was born to do. We saw it in Roxanne, The Jerk, Mixed Nuts, My Blue Heaven and so on. His performance as the slimy, moronic Freddy is perfect for the film. You hate him, you love him, you laugh at him. Pure Martin! Michael Caine is perfectly cast as Martin's adversary at conning. He is suave and sophisticated and has more heart than Martin's character but he also sort of plays a back seat to Martin as well. Even the scenes of them together I feel like Caine isn't quite matching the comedic timing or exuberance of Martin which is understandable. Still Caine is good to be Martin's Yang to his Ying. Glenne Headly is also perfectly cast as the naive young target of Martin and Caine. Headly is quirky and fun and sort of irritating in a syrupy cute sort of way. She is the glue that holds the story and cast together and her and Martin are terrific together and easily have the best scenes.

Its actually a very small cast, yes there are a host of small bit players but this film lives and breathes its main cast. They have the spotlight firmly placed on Steve Martin and that's where we want it. A legend in the film making business Frank Oz does directing duty and it definitely showcases his style. He has always been a terrific story teller and gets way more out of a script than what it presents. I mean, Dirty Rotten Scoundrels could have been completely forgettable if not for Martin and I think Frank Oz getting the most out of it. I must admit that I sort of expected a little more physical comedy and stunts but regardless its a fast paced, witty little story that will keep you watching and keep you laughing. Its an 80's classic for a reason. 7.5/10
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Dirty, Rotten , and Fabulous
Galina_movie_fan20 January 2005
This comedy happens to be one of my personal funniest movies of all time. I love the way the surprising twists and turns create hilariously funny situations which are the reflections of two characters' personalities. I think Michael Caine and Steve Martin were perfect for this type of humor; they are great together on the screen.

Lawrence (Michael Caine) and Freddie (Steve Martin) are con-men who live off women; the former - big-time, pretending to be a King in the Exile and residing in a charming Mediterranean French town, the latter is good conning women into giving him small sums of money or buying him a dinner. The town is not big enough for them to work together. They agree to a "winner stays, loser leaves" bet. Enters American visitor - rich heiress Janet Colgate (Glenn Headly), sweet and naive young woman.

Glen Headly - an intelligent, attractive actress more than held her own opposite Caine and Martin. It is easy to first overlook her work but after the movie is over, you realize how effortless, artful, and complicated her performance is. Last time, when I caught the movie on TV, my husband joined me and watching Glen Headly on the screen for what could easily be the tenth time, he asked me how she did it. Perhaps, the art of How they do it not only What they do keeps me glued to the screen every time DRS is on.

Highly enjoyable, sparkling, witty, and hilarious gem of the movie.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Martin & Caine are as good as Brando & Niven were
johnny-0827 February 2008
"Dirty Rotten Scoundrels" is remake of great old comedy "Bedtime Story", from director Frank Oz. Lawrence (Michael Caine) and Freddie (Steve Martin) are charlatans; and they realize that one town (Beaumont sur Mer) is small for both of them. So they decide to make a bet: the first one who gets $50.000 from a young lady wins, loser leaves town. Soon they find perfect target, young and rich Janet Colgate (Glenne Headly). This kind of comedy works because of actors and Oz managed to pick the right people. Caine and Martin are as good as Brando are Niven were. And I also have to praise Glenne Headly. There are so many jokes that makes this movie memorable and very good remake too. Frank Oz showed that he is capable of making great comedies ("What About Bob?", "In & Out"... to his newest "Death at a Funeral"). I wish that all comedies were funny like this one and all directors should learn from this movie. Cause this is recipe for successful comedy: good actors, great plot, capable direction and twist at the end. What more can you ask from a movie that is meant to entertain you?
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Thin, predictable
dlg3216 December 2005
Warning: Spoilers
The only beauty in DRS is the Riveria landscape. The plot is predictable (as is usual in comedies dealing with drifters and grafters and con-men - oh my). Glenn Headley's performance (as Janet Colgate, an innocent American who finds her naive self on the Mediterrean coast through good luck) is an effective parody of the goof-girls of earlier cinema, though the writing is so poor that the punch of her role in the plot is telegraphed much too early. Martin and Caine coast through the film, bringing nothing sharp or vinegary to roles that really need it. Martin does pull off an eerie allusion (or tribute) to Jerry Lewis, but it feels so much like an allusion that it fails as itself. (One starts thinking about Lewis instead of following the immediate story.) Such films trade on our willingness to forget how the wealthy live at the expense of those of us who work, but stop short of a critique of such exploitation. Nothing new about that, of course, and, when it's done well - as in "The Thin Man," for example - we don't care.
6 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed