Demon Warrior (1988) Poster

(1988)

User Reviews

Review this title
7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
Like a remake of Scalps....
LuisitoJoaquinGonzalez19 September 2005
Warning: Spoilers
It didn't take too long after Halloween had kicked off the slasher boom for the category to be cursed by continuous mediocrity. As early as 1983 the genre was already struggling to release more than three decent offerings per year and by '88 the stalk and slash flick had become pretty much the whipping boy of horror cinema. By that time major studios were all aware that repeating the tired formula was no longer a lucrative direction, which left it up to independent and mostly inexperienced filmmakers to continue the legacy that John Carpenter had created. Although there was still an impressive number of features hitting shelves in 88, most of them were weakly produced and taken as a whole they were eminently unappealing. With that said there were a couple of gems amongst the rubble. Scott Spiegel's Intruder in its uncut form was a superb gross out classic, whilst Evil Dead Trap proved that the cycle had not yet completely run out of style and panache. William Lustig's Maniac Cop was successful enough to launch a franchise and two years later Dead Girls and Mirage proved to be the last beguiling breaths of life in the ailing category.

It was the continual release of schlock like Berserker, Blood Lake and Rush Week that cursed the slasher movie to eight years of obscurity. It finally took the big budgeted flamboyance of Wes Craven's Scream to provide the necessary resuscitation. Having not heard anything about Demon Warrior before I came across it unexpectedly, I instantly assumed that it was part of the low brow trash that led to the downfall of the slasher phase. But with that said the movie boasts an intriguing premise that sits comfortably beside Scalps and Camping Del Terrore as another welcome addition to the Native-American influenced catalogue.

A truck pulls up on a woodland road and out step two laughably dramatised rednecks. The hillbilly lumberjacks are only on screen for around for ten seconds and then they are murdered by an unseen menace. Next we meet a troupe of five young adults that are heading to the same location for a spot of shotgun-target-practice on some of the local wildlife. The area is owned by Neil Willard and has been passed down through three generations of his family. His Grandfather stole the land from an Indian medicine man that was rumoured to have left a curse on the property. According to legend, every ten years a Demon Warrior with an extreme hatred for mankind stalks the forest reaping revenge on those he deems responsible for the pilfering of the tribe's home. It wouldn't be much fun if those myths were a falsehood, so regular as clockwork a maniacal assassin turns up with a taste for blood. Will the kids be able to stop this phantom killer…?

Demon Warrior is best described as a bigger budgeted (but still woefully cheap) re-imaging of Fred Olen Ray's Scalps. The bogeymen from both films are virtually identical and the director even throws in a scalping sequence to confirm my suspicions. Things start promisingly with some crisp Friday the 13th-style first-person cinematography and a couple of shock-jolts that were composed with finesse by director Frank Patterson. Thomas Callaway did a good job with the photography and the tribal-drum score makes a refreshing change from the more traditional late-eighties synthesizer rubbish. Flourishes of suspense are juxtaposed with a couple of credible directorial embellishments and there are even a few attempts at humour. The killer looked successfully creepy in demon attire and the inclusion of a bow and arrow as the main murder weapon was a deft touch from the director.

Fred Olen Ray's notorious slasher was notable for its stark and credibly unsettling atmosphere. Unfortunately despite being produced on twice the budget, Demon Warrior never comes close to the film that it so desperately emulates. Rumor has it that the majority of the actors were drafted from the Texas Baylor University and were not even paid for their inclusion in the feature, so of course it goes without saying that the dramatics are appropriately abysmal. I especially enjoyed the hilarious John Langione – an 'Italian' Native American (don't ask) that portrays about as much emotion as the trees in the forest that surrounded him. Warrior started with some credible glimpses of panache from the director that actually led me to believe that this could be a welcome inclusion to the slasher index. Unfortunately, the poisonous cocktail of heinous acting and an ending plucked directly from stupidsville seriously changed the initial plan I had in mind for a rating. It's a shame that the dramatics were so scraped from the bottom of the thespian barrel, because at times Demon Warrior showed flashes of potential.

All in all, Patterson's movie is a mixed bag of ideas – some of them were good, but mostly they were staggeringly mediocre. Because this was released at a time when the slasher genre had been watered down to avoid the scissor happy censors, there's really no gore worth mentioning. Even the scalping sequence is relatively tame compared to Olen Ray's graphic depiction. Demon Warrior has the odd moment of credibility, but not often enough to warrant a purchase. Not as bad as the aforementioned Berserker, Blood Lake et al, but not really THAT good either…..
7 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Watchable, fair but tame slasher
Bloodwank14 October 2011
Demon Warrior belongs in the ill populated realm of American Indian themed slasher junk. The only other examples that spring to mind are Scalps and the elusive Ghost Dance, one would think there might be more given the richness and ready exploitability of American Indian mythology but it seems not. Perhaps residual guilt, cultural squeamishness is the reason, maybe even lowbrow slasher purveyors felt some sense of impropriety? Or maybe they just weren't that imaginative, but given the maladjusted weirdness of some of the 80's slashers out there I'm not so sure. In any case, Demon Warrior is hardly an illustrious offering by any standards but it does entertain to some extent, which is more or less all that counts. There is some interest in the story, a cursed piece of land taken from the Indians and fated to decade spaced visitations of a murdering demon, an event which coincides with the arrival both of a clutch of dumbass youngsters and an Indian gentleman who objects to the judgement of his ancestors. There's a measure of scene setting, building with reasonable swiftness to mildly suspenseful action, with a weak pay off. For the die hard 80's crap viewer, things maintain enough of a sense of verve and fun to be semi worthy viewing. The titular demon warrior for instance is a fair antagonist, hulking muscle bound brute with nicely designed mask that wisely isn't shown for long at any point, giving him a certain mysterious and imposing presence. Then there's a score with some cool totem drums, appropriate to the material and a nice change from the usual synths and cheese tunes of such fare. Acting is more or less on the money as well, no one is actually much good but everyone gives their all, John Langione fills out his stereotype Indian role with some degree of studied gravitas, Jerry Coiteux makes for a suitably unlikable love rival a-hole type and John Garret a fair horndog. Things are pretty watchable once the film warms up, though the lack of any notable gore is a downer, a few fun kills keep things just the right side of irritation but there isn't anything to write home about or even really remember much of unless you happen to be a major geek for this kind of material. At least things get swift within a half hour or so and the whole film clocks at under 80 minutes so nothing is ever really boring, and there's an underlying dim likability powering it all. All in all, not something I can especially recommend unless you happen to be one of those who has to see every 80's slasher/semi slasher in existence. If you fall into that category, then this isn't too bad, gets a 5/10 from me. Anyone else can steer well clear though.
3 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
I've come to figure out the better the cover the worst the movie is.
b_kite9 January 2019
The best thing here is an explosion about half way threw in which one of our characters who looks a heck of a lot like John Oates drives a car off an embankment, other then that its a very average slasher that is low on the red stuff, with some sadly crappy kills. It's never boring however as it runs at a quick 81 minutes in length.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Funny
lowdowndeeper3 July 2005
When I was 13 or so I was lucky enough to find this film. It was part of an endless Danish series of really cheesy stuff. This however was the cheesiest I ever owned - but I guess I sold it, too bad. Well what to write... Better than "Manos: the hands of fate" and worse than "Critters 4". But it's definitely worth an hour and a half since this was made by people who wanted to make it. The acting isn't that terrible compared to several other eighties trash - in fact I kind of like the old man even though he did'NWT look that Indian to me. But I guess you can't have everything... Do yourselves a favour and look this up...
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
The King of the "B" Scary Movie
leebarret7 October 2000
I have a personal interest in the comments of this film for I played the Demon! No kidding, This film was made on a shoestring budget,but had the film quality of a large one. The college actors from Texas Baylor University were not paid but did get extra credit! In all honesty the film is good for a late night nothing on late night movie. And trust me I have seen multimillion dollar budget flicks alot worse! Problem maybe getting a copy.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Good Horror movie
larshansen200811 December 2012
I bought this movie on VHS back in 1992, and i must admit i enjoyed it when i first saw it, i know it is a B movie, but there is something good about it. There is not much gore or scares, if that is what your are after, but i think it has a good story about a Indian Curse. It was made in 1988, and not to many know about it, and that is a shame, because it is a fine movie. I was lucky to find it Original on VHS back in 1992, here in Denmark and i still have it, it has never been released on DVD and i doubt that it ever will. But i will give it 8 of 10 for the story, and for the fact that most of the cast was Students at Texas university, and they did a okay job at acting. Look it up, if you come across it.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Never seen worse acting, but still quite entertaining
TucknDar4 January 2001
I see from "the demons" comment on the movie, that the actors were unpaid students, and I believe that 100%! It must have been a laugh making this film, but I don't think the actors got many offers from other directors after acting in this... It is quite entertaining though, personally I'm quite a big fan of low-budget horror films, and the plot in this one isn't that bad actually. It's not very scary, but like a lot of other monster-kills-teenagers-films it is funny, and I'd lie if I said I thought "Demon Warrior" was boring. I'm glad I bought it, and I'd definately recommend it to other low-budget-horror fans!
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed