Blue Mountains, or Unbelievable Story (1983) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
11 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
10/10
Worth sitting on the same shelf with Beckett, Ionescu, and Kafka
Mihnea_aka_Pitbull10 January 2008
Twenty-two years after I saw it in cinema, Shengelaya's "Blue Mountains" still makes me laugh my ass off every time when I remember virtually ANY of its scenes. I can't forget the obsessive fight off the Honorable Vaso about the Groenland landscape threatening to crash upon his head, the eggs of the Venerable Irodion, or the perpetual answer of Shuqri Gomelauri: "No, I won't read - and YOU KNOW why I don't read!" :( The automatic idiosyncrasies of Zaza Zazaevitch ("Look at them! Playing football with motorcycles! I'm surprised they don't play it with buses!"), and the dementially absurd experiment with the bike's engine gunned inside the offices by Comrade Artem Tschatschanidze - the gorilla-like president of the moto-ball federation who, incidentally, also wrote a poetry manuscript - of love lyrics! The messy fables author who for no reason at all turns into a mining engineer, and his hysteric relationship with the dizzy Aunt Tamara. The daily ritual of the Beautiful Bella's husband and daughter coming to the office, after school, only to see her again courted by Soso... And, most of all, the irresistible absentee characters: Murmanidze, the one who never applied his signature, Kuparadze, the one who always gave a friendly call, and the elusive Guivi, always hidden and silent behind the locked door of his office where the two thugs knock every day: "Guivi, it's us!" - to no avail... Definitely, "The Blue Mountains" remains a masterpiece of the most absurd humor possibly. Imaginative and fresh, fast paced and precise - in a full contrast with the bureaucratic world it's depicting: dumb and stale, sluggish and chaotic. Worth sitting on the same shelf with Beckett's "En attendant Godot", Ionescu's "Rhinocéros" and "La Cantatrice Chauve", and Kafka's "Trial". I still pray to find it one day on the torrents or P2P!

L.E.: I got it! :D I have it on DVD! Wowwwidze!
46 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A tragicomic fairy tale satire on the Soviet system
Osip23 June 1999
In this extremely funny satire on Soviet bureaucracy, the protagonist, a hapless author, attempts again and again to get his editors to accept his manuscript -- a novel with the title "Blue mountains or Tienshan." The story unfolds with the inevitability of a fairy tale in which a naive hero is painfully being initiated into the ways of the world, and while the would-be author wanders through the hallways of his publishers, we in turn learn a lot about the crumbling Soviet system and the inactivity of its bureaucratic functionaries. By Hollywood standards, the film may be slow and repetitive, but it is precisely the repetition of tragicomic situations that bring the film to the heights of a Beckettian absurdity. Even after the end of the Soviet Union a film that is worth while watching.
35 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A movie with amazing humor and unforgettable dialogues.
annie_geo20 January 2011
Warning: Spoilers
"ცისფერი მთები" (Blue Mountains) is all time my favorite Georgian movie. I've seen it at least for 15 times and I still make new discoveries. The movie takes place in a typical former Soviet office that looks like a serious organization but appears to be absolutely useless. The "hardworking" employees claim for high salaries and bonuses for doing nothing. The film shows the trouble of Soso (a young book writer)who tries to get his book approved for printing by this unnamed organization. The movie is based on book written by Revaz Cheishvili who is an amazing writer. I've just read the book and enjoyed it a lot. I recommend the book as well. I think that "ცისფერი მთები" is the masterpiece of cinematography. P.S. Sorry for mistakes. English is not my native language :)
14 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Allegory To Modern Organizations
g-tsaava-208-82888619 January 2015
This movie is timeless masterpiece, one of the best in Georgian cinematography. It is considered to be allegory of the system in Soviet Union and that is true; but nowadays when that system doesn't exist, it is difficult to relate to that period of time, especially for younger generations, who were born after collapse of Soviet Union.Somehow the movie hasn't lost it's relevance, even more, now this allegory can be attributed to organizations and to modern managers. Bureaucracy, lack of communication, procrastination,absenteeism and strange decision making process, what we often see in our workplaces, this movie is allegory to everything listed above. It is heavily loaded with quotations. It is one of the must watch movies in my opinion. Even more, you can watch it several times and every time you can rediscover a lot of new things. Thus, if you haven't seen it yet, I strongly recommend.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The Stars Have Aligned
nickged22 January 2019
The director, Eldar Shengelaia, remembers newspapers praising "Blue Mountains", writing that "this is Kafka!" after it premiered on Cannes film festival in 1985. And just as Kafka's "Process" (which this movie was most likely compared to) is often narrowed to a "criticism of authoritarian rule", so is this movie commonly interpreted as (merely) a comedy that satirizes bureaucracy. This is, I think, a misapprehension. Kafka - and here I'll stop using him because I don't think it's all that similar - wrote about life in general, or life as a process where you're declared guilty and sentenced (to death) for reasons unknown to you. "Blue Mountains" is also about life in general.

A young author is trying to get his novel published, walking around the publishing house and delivering copies of his manuscript to different employees, who, despite the protagonist's persistence, eventually don't read it. This is the leitmotif. The reason his novel is not read by anyone is not bureaucracy - they just don't want to. These people are neither too busy, nor hostile or stupid communists who can't appreciate a talented young voice - we don't even know if the novel is any good; They don't want to do what they are currently destined to do, they are indifferent, so they procrastinate, follow other commitments, and sometimes blame bureaucracy (if no one reads the review at least I've learned how to spell this word). I'm not completely denying the portrayal of some problems caused by too much bureaucracy in this movie - especially the part about "removing Greenland", a kitsch painting barely hanging above a desk of an employee who's afraid it will eventually fall on him but can't remove it without a permission, which is not granted to him. However, it would be naive to assume that the enduring fame and appeal for this movie is a result of general audience's disdain of soviet bureaucracy.

Another thing some critics say is that the publishing house, walls of which crack and, ultimately, it collapses, is an allegory of Soviet Union. Allegedly, when Gorbachev saw this movie he told Shevardnadze that unless they do something about it, USSR is going to collapse as this building did. Today it seems like an obvious comparison as we know that USSR has in fact collapsed similarly to the building and this movie predicted it's fall. However, this is not how the movie ends. In the last scene, as we are shown the new building from the outside (new republic after the collapse, if we follow this allegory), where the publishing has moved, we hear the familiar angry voice shouting "remove it (meaning "Greenland")!". Back to the first point, I see this movie as a portrayal of attitudes of different people towards life and work and generally, the will of a man to be doing "something else".

Let's not forget what an amazing collaboration this movie is: film director Eldar Shengelaia working with one of the best XX century Georgian writers - Rezo Chkheidze on the script and soundtrack being written by Giya Kancheli - a composer known abroad chiefly as a contributor to modern classical music and in post-soviet countries as an author of unforgettable scores for movies. The cast consists of both award-winning actors and non-actors. "Blue Mountains" is very lovely. Sometimes I find myself looking for a single scene or a single line and then end up watching the whole movie.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
"THE TRIAL" as directed by Preston Sturges
CaptEcco24 August 2006
BLUE MOUNTAINS, OR AN IMPROBABLE STORY ("Why two titles?") is an absurdist tale in which a novelist takes his latest manuscript to his familiar publishing house, only to have it pushed aside, lost, damaged, stolen, or simply ignored again and again as the employees go about their meaningless, repetitive work. Things start out fairly normal and get gradually stranger as the story continues. As film satires go it's not quite as cunning as Bunuel's best work (which it seems it could have been influenced by) but it's still a funny, sharp and brutally honest jab at the crumbling Soviet government and bureaucratic ineptness in all its forms. Ramaz Giorgobiani's expressionless lead performance is an interesting and eventually necessary realist counterpoint to the often wild and intentionally bloated performances of the bureaucrats. The aforementioned Bunuel is an obvious cinematic connection, as is Fellini's ORCHESTRA REHEARSAL, but as I was watching it I kept thinking this is what might happen if Preston Sturges filmed a Kafka story. Well worth a look.
12 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Permit A38 in the Soviet Union Warning: Spoilers
"Tsisperi mtebi anu daujerebeli ambavi" or "Blue Mountains, or Unbelievable Story" is a Soviet film from 1983 that is mostly in the Georgian language and this also makes total sense if you look at who made it and which actors appeared in it. Difficult to call it a Russian movie, it seems through and through Georgian. You also find parts not only in Russian in here, but some French and German too. The latter caught my attention especially with that young girl saying it. Sadly, I did not find any information on the child actress' name and same is true about the blonde or rather red-haired secretary who is on her break on a few occasions, so yeah the cast list could indeed be more complete here. Anyway, the writer and director here is Eldar Shengelaia and he was almost 50 when he made this film back in 1983, so this means that it has its 40th anniversary now and this also means that Shengelaia turned 90 not too long ago and is still with us. Hopefully, this is also the case if you come here a bit delayed to read this review of mine. His round birthday may actually also play a little role why I got to watch this film on the big screen. There was a short retrospective going on and other films from the man were also shown. If you take the imdb ratings into account, it is probably between this one and a film he made about a decade earlier which is his most known. Given the fact that he worked in a total of eight different decades apparently and that his last project is not too long ago, the number of films he made is not super high, definitely not as high as you would expect. Shengelaia's co-writer here is Rezo Cheishvili, who is no longer with us, but it seems that the two were quite close as they worked together on several occasions and also you find Cheishvili credited as a writer for Shengelaia's perhaps final career work, a short film from 2020 and Cheishvili had already been dead for five years at that point, but he still got the heads-up from Shengelaia for his contribution. That's what true friends do I assume. They were also both born in 1933.

But back to this film here: It is not super old I would say. There are quite a few cast members that are still alive now. Ramaz Giorgobiani is one of them and he is getting closer to 80 now too, so he was half as old back then as he is now you can say. Maybe he is the closest to a lead this film has, even if I personally would call them all supporting. Nobody has the screentime really in these over 1.5 hours that sets him apart from the rest. It is also not a film about individual performances or fates, but it is all about the overall picture. I liked how full the room was during the screening. The film deserves it, even if the rating on imdb may be nonetheless a bit too high as a whole. Like come one, one of the best 100 films ever or even higher this is not, but it would be there if more people had seen and rated it and it could have kept the current rating or only lost 0.1 or 0.2 in the process. This film relies heavily on recurring jokes from beginning to end. There were maybe too much to remember them all or maybe some I might have overlooked too, but I will still give it a try and say what stayed in the mind for me. There is of course the guy who just wants to learn French without getting disturbed, another crucial reference to this place/country/film reaching out to the world outside. I think it was also his office or door where people were constantly knocking and he pretended not to be there because they maybe had something not so nice in mind. The one who enters the room, however, seems to be the closest he has to a friend at the office. Then there is the elevator chaos Which was funny because it stopped a few steps to high up, something that could be fixed quickly early on, but later on it seems a man is stuck there and towards the end they say something needs to be done about it. Is he the one who gets out of the house last there? Maybe when enough collapsed around the elevator for him to get out? I am not sure.

Then there is of course the guy who brings his daughter and they visit their wife/mother at the office. Darejan Sumbatashvili was pretty attractive there, not gonna lie. One guy from the office would agree. He also got the husband's evil looks on a few occasions, but the outburst is not happening. At least not at the end ironically when it is a completely harmless situation and there he is so jealous all of a sudden. This made no sense at all and that is why it was so funny. There is chaos all over and no reason to this movie, which maybe fits all the character quite nicely and this is why it worked so well. Then there is of course the constant talking about a picture or painting and how it is situated somewhere where it does not feel right and should be moved elsewhere. Or should maybe the guy sitting under it move elsewhere? There was a great deal of absurdity to this running gag too, especially when said man is really almost killed by the big picture towards the end then. Okay, "big picture" could be understood differently for sure in this context. This was not even intended. Another inclusion I need to mention are the folks outside playing motoball (motorcycle polo) or whatever this sport is called. In any case, it is nothing that has really stayed successful in the decades since then. They say it has become a thing in Europe, but seemed it did not stay this way. For some reason, I found it outrageously funny when, on one occasion after the guy in the office keeps complaining about the players outside so much, all of a sudden an important figure from the motoball society or community stands before him. We do not really know why he is there or what he wants, but it was still so hilarious and totally came out of nowhere.

Then there is the old man who just wants a certain piece of information of something to be dealt with and he is so kind and courteous. He basically does nothing else, but when we see him, it is nonetheless funny because we know pretty much exactly what he would say and that he would take all the blame once again on his search for the director as if he is constantly interrupting people. Like also how he asks if the director is in and the woman says yes and he goes to get his buddy and seconds later the director is heading out again. Poor fella this man. Not the director, but the one waiting. Wasn't he also the one is on one occasion called the guy that keeps staring at the ceiling? And last but not least, there is the one where I mentioned the actor's name not too long ago and he just wants people, especially the boss, to read his book, but he is having a hard time and, in a way, almost surrenders towards the end then and gives in and accepts that nobody will really be reading it. They also used his book's title for the name of the movie I thin, at least part of it, so yeah if you expected blue mountains here or some great nature recordings I have to disappoint you. Almost all of it takes place on the inside of an office building with a great deal of bureaucracy. No way you could just hang a picture somewhere else without proper discussion and evaluation and maybe an expert panel. What you do see outside are the folks playing ball. This came also repeatedly and almost seemed like the exact same approach from the inside through the window while we are listening to this really, really catchy music.

I don't think I have to go totally into detail here how the world outside with its (technical) progress is supposed to be seen as the world outside the Soviet Union and that this is most likely a movie that was not particularly liked inside the Soviet Union. In the end, the entire construct collapses. The parallel could honestly not be less subtle there. I was entertained nicely here. The positive recommendation for this film was never in doubt for me. Maybe I do not perceive it as great as the imdb rating suggests and others during my screening also liked it more, but the thumbs-up I still safe. I also would not say it is a mix between comedy and drama as it is hinted on imdb. More likely comedy exclusively. If you did not understand the characters' words and only saw their serious faces and expressions and monotonous language, then you could think it is a very sterile drama, but subtitles will help you in that department. For me, it reminded me a bit of a certain place from the Asterix movies, but go make up your mind yourself how you perceive it. I suggest you go give it a chance, if it is shown on television or at a nearby theater. I would not call it a must-see though. The film attracted some awards attention in Poland and Spain by the way and I keep misspelling its title because of the similarity to a famous tennis player. The beginning of the title at least, but yeah anyway, I would have a hard time in general to say where this film was from if I only read the title and had not found out about the language origins. This is really it now. Go watch.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Incrimination of people, not the system!
eabakkum23 December 2013
Warning: Spoilers
If you browse through my reviews (recommended!), you will notice my fascination for left-wing solutions of social problems. This explains my interest in the film "Das Blaue vom Himmel" (German title; Golubyje Gory), which was produced in the Soviet Union of 1984, so just before the onset of Perestroyka. It concerns the efforts of a writer in order to get his manuscript published. Everybody knows that the Leninist states suffered from a rigorous and rather absurd censorship. I hoped that this film would elaborate on this theme, particularly because it is a comedy. Unfortunately my hope is idle, and censorship is not mentioned, except for one single allusion about a disappeared manuscript (Stalinist-like orders from above). So if the story was meant to be about censorship, then the censors have done a good job. The whole narrative turns on the rigidity and ineffectiveness of the state bureaucracy. If you suspect that this is a covert criticism on the Leninist system, then you are wrong. For it is not the system that is incriminated, but the workers that constitute the system. In fact the Leninist elite loved to complain about the laziness, the ineffectiveness and the lack of moral of the common people. If only the people would have the Leninist attitude, then the system would definitely work. Here are some of these official jokes from the East-German (German Democratic Republic, GDR) comics magazine Eulenspiegel. "The day will come that our products will be so good, that we will need gate controls". Or: "Waiter! Wouldn't it be better if you help your colleagues instead of making music?" (REAL joke: waiter = one who thinks money grows on trays). Or: "Turned on and immediately out of order? All costumers who come here claim that, defendant (accused)!". It is a bit like blaming the victim. There was cabaret in the same style, for instance Distel in Berlin. In spite of my disappointment it is still an amusing film. The colors have an unpleasant shade of grey, but that may be on purpose. My version of the film has been dubbed by DEFA in the former GDR. This creates some problems: "male organ" is translated into "mine shaft" etc. But although I prefer subtitles (in the Netherlands we hate to disturb our neighbors), I can live with this. After all they were all Leninist comrades - Russian or not. Nevertheless, if you really prefer a film about censorship, try "Feigenblatt fuer Kuhle Wampe" (about censorship during the German Republic of Weimar). Oh, and don't forget to check off the "useful: yes" ballot. I love comments.
0 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
fall of a period
Vincentiu27 August 2013
absurd humor, memorable characters, a manuscript and a fight with shadows. a film about a death soul society, gallery of masks and hypocrisy, prisoners of waste of time and victims of need to be only insignificant shadows of existence. a film from East who present not only a deep crisis who can be considered version of Ionesco or Beckett theater but , in fact, it is only cruel-precise image of Soviet Union fall. nothing new because this form of satire is present, as instrument against politic regime, in many films from Communist camp but in this mixture of Ilf and Petrov, Bruno Schultz and Daniil Harms is something different. the secret ingredient - poor manuscript who can broke the large - fragile circle of fake certitudes.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Eh.
ASuiGeneris25 March 2024
Yay for a baiting title. The Blue Mountains, or Unbelievable Story. Refers to one of the slightly chuckles inducing gag with the protagonist trying to get his script read that is never read. Another one is the Greenland painting that is surrounded by bureaucracy to get removed. Other thing is the irksome motoball league that is somehow always playing outside, supposedly the cause of the building falling apart from the vibrations.

When it comes to humor, am I difficult to impress or is this not my type of humor? You tell me. I chuckled in my head maybe a few times, but other than that it was nothing impressive to warrant the ridiculously high ratings, currently 8.7 & 4.0, IMDB & LetterBoxd, respectively. Used repetition, running gags, in a proficient manner that made for an entertaining enough couple hours, but nothing to write home about!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Watch for Bella
Cristi_Ciopron23 February 2010
Warning: Spoilers
THE BLUE MOUNTAINS is a Glasnost satire made by a handful of citizens of one of the Sovietic nationalities, the Georgians, in a classic Russian genre—the bureaucracy—exploitation. Either as an Empire or as an Union of Soviet Republics, the Russian state faced the evils of bureaucracy; and in this comedy Soso (the writer, author of THE BLUE MOUNTAINS, OR TIAN—SHAN) and Zazaevici (the manager of the publishing house) and Bella and the Groenland landscape and Tina and the dizzy Tamara are carried by a whirl of mindless agitation and formalities.

An oldster is afraid of being crushed by a huge painting representing a Greenland landscape; Bella has a jealous husband; the building of this publishing house crumbles—in lively, even merry tones of apocalyptic and _absurdist satire. THE BLUE MOUNTAINS is not bitter or resentful, but jovial, hopeless and at times even cheerful.

Made in '84, on the eve of the Perestroika, THE BLUE MOUNTAINS constitutes a foremost example of a Russian satirical genre—the bureaucracy—exploitation, the bureaucratic machine depicted in either apocalyptic or _absurdist tones. Performances—wise, notable are the silhouettes of old blasé clerks, like the one who fears the Greenland landscape, or the former mining engineer.

The Russians enjoy depicting themselves as zany and loco; and since their huge state needed, as Empire or as Union of Soviets, proportionate bureaucratic engines, the clash of the national soul with the exigencies of a vast state structure led to funny and grim results. The characters of THE BLUE MOUNTAINS are not Russians, but Georgians; the movie is, though, made as a Russian comedy.
0 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed