Another Country (1984) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
49 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Transferred Nationalism
JamesHitchcock24 June 2017
Although the closing titles contain the standard "all characters are fictitious" disclaimer, the scriptwriter Julian Mitchell has never denied that his main character Guy Bennett is a thinly-disguised portrait of Guy Burgess, one of the notorious Cambridge spy ring who acted for Soviet Russia. The film is mostly set in an English public school during the 1930s, based on Eton where Burgess was educated. (What shocked British society most about the spy ring was not so much the treachery of its members as the fact that most of them were from well-off Establishment families and educated at the country's most prestigious schools).

At the heart of the film is the friendship between Bennett and another student, Tommy Judd. Although they are very different in personality, they are drawn to one another because both, in their own way, are rebels against the system. Judd, a committed Marxist, is a rebel with a cause who despises the school and all it stands for. Bennett is a rebel without a cause whose attitudes are rather contradictory. He can see the absurdity and hypocrisy of the public school system and of the Establishment in general, but still wants to benefit from that system. His greatest ambition is to become a "god", school slang for a senior prefect, regarded as the school's social elite. Much of the plot revolves around the machinations of various senior pupils to achieve this coveted distinction; Judd is virtually alone in disdaining it. At this stage Bennett is not actually a Communist; when Judd quotes Lenin's attack on Karl Kautsky, spouting a lot of Marxist jargon in the process, Bennett replies "Oh, that's bad!", but in a sarcastic tone of voice which implies that he neither knows nor cares what Judd is talking about.

Bennett is also trying to come to terms with his homosexuality. He is engaged in a sexual relationship with another boy, James Harcourt, and there are indications that he has engaged in similar behaviour with others. The school's attitude to homosexuality, in fact, is fairly schizophrenic. Bennett and Harcourt are by no means the only pupils involved in gay relationships; indeed, another boy in Bennett's house has recently committed suicide after being caught in flagrante with his lover by a teacher. The greatest concern, however, of the staff and most of the prefects is the need to avoid scandal; gay relationships are quietly tolerated provided they are kept discreet. When one prefect, Fowler, attempts to crack down on homosexuality, motivated by Puritanical religious zeal, he makes himself very unpopular with his fellows, who fear that he might uncover things best left hidden. Bennett represents a challenge to this system of organised hypocrisy, not because he is gay but because he is temperamentally incapable of discretion. The greatest sin is to get caught, because that would force the authorities to take action they would prefer to avoid.

If scandal does leak out, the authorities prefer to insist that the boys were merely experimenting or going through a youthful phase. Even the otherwise nonconformist Judd takes this line. (Unlike some of his colleagues, he is firmly heterosexual and regards homosexuality with bemused incomprehension). Bennett, however, realises that being gay is an inescapable part of who he is, not a mere passing fad, and that he will never love women. The film's implication, in fact, is that Bennett/Burgess spied for the Russians not because he was a convinced Communist but as an act of revenge against the British Establishment for rejecting him on account of his sexual orientation. He never asked himself whether his sexuality would be any more acceptable to the Soviet Establishment than it was to the British one. (By the time the film was made in 1984, homosexuality had been legalised in Britain but remained strictly banned in Russia).

On one level the title "Another Country" is derived from a line in the hymn "I Vow to Thee, My Country", which we hear being sung, although on another it refers to the Soviet Union, the state to which Judd and ultimately Bennett give their loyalty, with perhaps a hidden reference to Orwell's theory of "transferred nationalism"- the idea that supporters of Stalin and Soviet Russia were motivated by the same type of uncritical, unthinking nationalism as flag-waving British jingoists, with the difference that their loyalty was transferred from their own country to a foreign one.

"Another Country" was made by Goldcrest, the company which has become most closely associated with the great British cinematic revival of the eighties, but unlike some of their other productions it has largely disappeared from view over the last thirty years. In 1984, controversy over the spy ring was still raging. Leftists, who might under other circumstances have been sympathetic to Communism, savagely attacked the spies as prize examples of upper-class treachery and corruption, whereas some rightists, most notoriously Peregrine Worsthorne, attempted to defend them on the grounds that loyalty to one's beliefs could be more important than loyalty to one's country.

Since the end of the Cold Way we no longer care as much about the Cambridge Spies as we once did, which may explain why "Another Country" can seem unfashionable these days. It is, however, a very good film, distinguished by an excellent performance from a young Colin Firth as Judd, surprisingly likable despite his extremist views, and an even better one from Rupert Everett as the floppy-haired, nonchalantly rebellious yet secretly vulnerable Bennett. It also has a lot to say about matters of perennial importance- loyalty to country, loyalty to friends, political idealism and the rights of sexual minorities. An intriguing and thought-provoking film. 8/10
27 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Beautiful and evocative period piece
pixielynx2 August 2007
Another Country is a very telling portrait of life at one of England's top private schools in the 1930s. On the surface, everything looks perfect. Privileged youth frolics in a variety of beautiful locations, whilst receiving the best education money could buy. It all looks idyllic, but of course, there is a dark underbelly of violence and prejudice that provokes a life changing decision for the main character, Guy Bennett, played very elegantly by Rupert Everett. Colin Firth's character provides a nice Communist commentary on the appalling elitism of English society and he and Everett both turn in exceptional performances. This movie clearly launched both of their careers.

Although the natural beauty of the locations would have made it hard for anyone to make an ugly picture, this film is so exquisitely shot and scored, that it is almost painful at times. Sure there are some bad moments (Rupert Everett's terrible make up for his scenes as the aged Bennett springs to mind and there is a certain clichéd quality to some of the scenes) but on the whole, the good far outweighs the bad.
37 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Brilliant little period film
MieMar5 August 2010
Warning: Spoilers
This film is ageing brilliantly well. OK, the end might, the chat about accepting your sexuality etc, be very much of its time and of the stage where the film originated, but the film is crisp and, despite its slowness, wonderfully alive. The classically beautiful photography also helps the timeless feel of it.

In the scenes of Everett and Firth the film really comes alive, and the actors have hardly since been better. Firth of course has less to do but the strange Firth hallmark reserve - which Tom Ford exploited for A Single Man but for me, in most roles including that one, makes him somehow permanently fake - has not yet set in. Judd, the character, holds himself back but is present in a way that older Firth rarely manages. Everett, without a doubt, has never been better. Which, in itself, is a bit of a tragedy. Its a fantastic role but he is stunningly good, subtle and showy at the same time. No wonder that Orson Welles was impressed. His Guy is insolent, vulnerable, naive, world-wise, cynical, poetic, open, deceptive, gentle and ruthless. I was a bit of an admirer of Everett's work and persona even before seeing this film - he seems one of the last real people out there, in the homogenised, we're all just lovely people, really, fame-game arena - but find to my disappointment that his acting work is too often the least interesting thing about him. Which, truly, is a pity because as this film shows, he really has the goods as an actor - and clearly enough experience and emotional honesty in real life too - to actually really grab us, draw us in and make us feel for him, with him. But in a lot of his work it seems he rarely brings the full package of emotions to work, happy to perform a facet of a man for us - often a rather glib one - rather than a full creature. I'd love to see him do something brave again, as I am sure that the man and the actor he is now could wash the floor with his younger self, in terms of complex, deeply felt emotion.

Another Country, with is milieu of extreme constraint, beautifully frames the feeling and behaviour of the boys it observes, and the focus on the endless rituals of the boarding school life also work to remind us how world is out to shape these boys (a kind of an anti-Harry Potter/Trinian's, in that aspect) and works still as a metaphor for society at large. In some ways times have changed less than we'd hope - or less than it looked like it would change, a few decades ago - even if caning is a distant memory.

I wanted to give Another Country 9 stars but unfortunately, although the cast in uniformly very strong I feel that the third key role, Guy's love interest James, hasn't dated well and the performance is flat, leaving Everett to do all the work in their scenes. For the film to overcome the slight staginess of the ending and to give real meaning to the innocent way that Guy and James choose to conduct their romance when boys around them are clearly habitually doing much more would have needed an actor who could match Firth and Everett in terms of interpretation of a role.

Oh, and people who can be bothered to complain about the old-man make up on Everett at the end - get a life. This is a film, all latex looks fake, even today, how ever much you choose to believe it, for what ever reason.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
visually and dramatically impressive
hugh197122 January 2002
This film is both visually and dramatically impressive. From the outset, we are treated to lavish cinematography of Eton College and its grounds and the surrounding countryside. This is contrasted with the drab scenes of Moscow from where Guy Bennet recounts his story. Everything is bathed in a golden glow, backed up by the sound of boyish voices singing hymns (the title itself comes from popular school hymn 'I vow to Thee my Country'; which was sung at the funeral of Princess Diana in 1997).

This contrasts starkly with the brutality of the school's disciplinary system, where one boy is so ashamed of being caught in a homosexual act that he hangs himself in the school chapel. Those who question the school's code become outcasts, such as Bennet and Judd, unless they are 'useful' in some way - ie when Judd is needed to prevent an unpopular boy becoming head of house.

One important fact I noticed is that you hardly ever see a master in the school, and you never see the boys in lessons: this shows Eton not as merely a school, but as a microcosm of society with its own specific hierarchy.

There is interesting character development: Bennett, initially a philanderer who takes nothing seriously, eventually realises that he is a confirmed homosexual and begins to understand Judd's vision of a perfect society possible through communism ('not heaven on earth, but earth on earth - a just earth')Similarly Judd realises that sometimes it is necessary to sacrifice one's principles for the greater good.

There is a lot about this film that is hackneyed - the bullying, sadistic prefects, the angelic boys with floppy fringes singing chapel anthems, the stock rebellious phrases etc, (and I won't even mention Guy Bennet's ludicrous old-man makeup)but overall it is a beautiful piece of cinematography with some good acting from the young Mr Everett and Mr Firth.
51 out of 56 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
By now, 30 years on, something of a curio, but enjoyable enough and well-made
pfgpowell-127 December 2014
For English of a certain age - and possibly for those from other countries - the phrase 'the third man' and the triumvirate of Kim Philby, Guy Burgess and Donald McLean (until the eventual flight to Moscow of Philby, it was simply Burgess and McLean) have a certain resonance.

In later years the trio expanded to include a knight of the realm who eventually rose to become the Queen of England's art expert - something of an about-turn for a traitor - and is also said to have included one John Cairncross as 'the fifth man', although that is still in dispute.

Over the years, of course, and with changing geopolitical obsessions and problems the Cambridge spies attract less interest if only because Islamic State/Isil/IS/Isis and various other offshoots of Al Qaeda have been passed the mantle of 'the enemy' and, well, it was all 55 years ago. We have new 'spies' and their stories to get excited about.

All four (or five) spies have an interesting story to tell and to this day it is difficult to establish quite why the products of England's privileged class should have decided to bite the hand which fed them. Blunt, certainly, will have wanted to undo his past, if only because the social position he attained as Surveyor of the Queen's Pictures was one which the old queen enjoyed a great deal. Philby seems, since his childhood in India where until the age of five he spoke both English and Urdu fluently and daily played with the children of his parents servants, to have suffered from a kind of split personality - I don't mean that in any medical sense - and had no difficulty hobnobbing with wealthy colleagues down in the club before meeting his controller and sending other colleagues to certain death. He was said to have been a real charmer so perhaps he was simply a sociopath who could not empathise.

Anther Country is about Guy Burgess, also like Blunt homosexual, and if you don't know much about him, the film's rather too neat explanation of why he became a traitor seems a tad glib. But in fact Burgess was nothing if not superficial. He seems to have been the least ideologically inspired of the Cambridge Four and, being a huge drinker, was a constant source of concern to the others and his Soviet controllers that he would while drunk give the game away.

He and McLean were the first to break cover and head for Soviet Russia when it seemed likely that McLean, a diplomat in Britain's Washington embassy, was about to be unmasked. It has often been suggested that Burgess need not have fled: no one was onto him and his treachery was only discovered once he had hightailed it to Moscow.

Some even suggest that he fully expected to return to Britain, though what he thought might be made of his actions back in London only the Lord knows. Certainly, he didn't take to Moscow life and (according to Wikipedia) had all his clothes tailored in London's Savile Row and shipped to him in Moscow.

The other notable aspect of Another Country is its portrayal of life at an English public school (the name, helpfully for Americans we give some of our private schools). The film takes place in the Thirties so I can't comment on whether aspects of such a school are exaggerated. But I attended a Roman Catholic public school (as a boarder) for five years in the Sixties and I can confirm that many of the absurdities prevailed, as did the rigid hierarchy of boys. We were still being caned for the silliest of reasons - though we called it being beaten - though in the more enlightened Sixties this could no longer be done by prefects.

The film takes place in the summer term when the air was sufficient balmy for the boys to take midnight walks or meet for midnight trysts. I remember many pleasant afternoons lying in the sunshine under a tree, doing nothing but gazing through the leaves into a blue sky. But I also remember the sheer misery of having to bathe and shower in cold water - not for any character building but because the school was too tight-fisted to get the hot water system modernised and repaired. I remember the goddam awful pigswill which we were served up as 'food', and the almost frightening speed with which violence could erupt for no very good reason. Oh, and I also remember all the talk of 'minnows' and boys that someone 'fancied' though not of it, thank God came my way.

So I suspect Another Country holds a certain attraction for its portrayal of the kind of life lived at such a school, although a portrayal now long outdated - corporal punishment is no longer legal at any school. The story is rather slight, the boys rather too articulate, speaking as they do as characters might in a play or a film. Or perhaps as I am now well beyond the age they were, I simply can't remember how young folk talk and talked.

The explanation as to what decided Guy Burgess/Bennett to choose the dark side and betray his country - because he had been cheated out of the bauble he craved more than any other - was, perhaps, a touch to pat. There again the real Guy Burgess was such a loose cannon who didn't seem to believe much for very long anyway, perhaps it really was like that. The film is, perhaps, best viewed as a well-made period piece.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
disappointing lack of insight
xenofil24 June 2007
Why did this one Guy Burgess, of the multitudes (according to the movie) who engaged in gay sex at prep school, end up betraying his country and class to the Stalinist soviets, and why should we care? You'll never learn from this movie. As best I can tell from it, Burgess cared nothing about the rights of the working classes, and had no particular issues with the extreme privileges of the oligarchy in England. Homosexuality certainly wouldn't have stood in his way if he had been more discreet. In fact he seems to have ratted out of a fit of pique over being outmanoeuvred in the competition for the most privileged rank.

I saw no reason to admire the Burgess character. The villain Fowler was only guilty of petty stiff-neckedness, as far as I could see, Judd was perhaps admirable, but flat, and in fact the most interesting character was Barclay, the reasonable prefect.

This was an interesting introduction to the intricate politics of elite British boys' schools. The boys were certainly good looking, but it was not a sexy movie, the drama fell pretty slack towards the end, and I'm just as ignorant of the interesting career of Guy Burgess as I was before.
11 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Another Country, Another Time
daoldiges9 November 2022
I remember seeing Another Country during its original run and really liking it. Having recently revisited it I'm wondering if I should have just left well enough alone, because I do not feel it has held up well in the 30+ years since that first viewing. Yes, I still enjoyed this film but just not to the degree I did originally. It does still look good and I still find the inner-workings and machinations of the English public school world quite interesting. It's the story itself that seems a but thinner to me now. The reasons given for the Guy Bennett character defecting to the Soviet Union seems a bit flimsy and reactionary. It now appears to be a case of style over substance where Another Country is concerned. Still, if you're curious then do check it out and see for yourself.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Lovely Film
brian_wescott6 September 2001
I saw this movie again the other day and am impressed at how well it has held up. Though it's a little hard to follow the arcane hierarchies of 1930s British public school life, that is precisely the point-- these people are suffocating in the meaningless rituals of their class. Rupert Everett and Colin Firth give outstanding performances as the openly gay and communist members of their school, and the unfolding of the relationship between Everett and Cary Elwes is some of the most romantic footage I've ever seen. Though very few of us live in such a stratified social climate these days, we would do well to understand the webs of hierarchy and ritual that bind us all in one way or another.
42 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Another Country
CinemaSerf8 June 2023
Told by way of a interview retrospective, this is a tale of disillusionment and political naivety amongst the English upper classes in the 1930s. Guy Bennett (Rupert Everett) was a student at Cambridge University - openly gay to his fellow students - on the periphery of the social and political norms of the day. His friend Tommy Judd (Colin Firth) and he bonded largely out of a desire for non-conformity, not because they believed in the same ideals; Firth a fervent Marxist, Everett ambitious - perhaps because of his sexuality - to reach the top of the hierarchical structure at the school. He falls in love, however - with the younger James Harcourt (Cary Elwes) and all the blind-eyes that had previously been turned to his behaviour were turned full beam and his behaviour, and to some extent that of Judd are challenged to breaking point. Julian Mitchell's play has been self-adapted to demonstrate just how insidious the educational establishment could be for those who did not play the game; and how empowering it could be for the ultra-conformist bullies (in this film deftly portrayed by Tristan Oliver as Fowler) and it is little wonder these academic institutions became an intellectual petrie dish for those recruiting future espionage assets. The film looks gorgeous - though filmed in Oxford - with a gently complementary score from Michael Storey.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Truly brilliant, although quintessentially English
fodwod3 August 2003
I was living in France when this film was first released. I had seen the stage play and thoroughly enjoyed it. The film was so good I actually saw it twice over it's opening weekend.

The bulk of the action is set in an English boarding school in the 1930s. This is marvelously portrayed - school bullies, inter house rivalries, the cadet force, cricket - and there is some marvelous interaction between Rupert Everett and Colin Firth. The latter's impassioned defence of Stalin is understated comedy at its finest.

This is a film of great subtlety and beauty, well acted, and underpinned by a haunting soundtrack.
55 out of 60 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good.. but
gbhxkcggj2 October 2021
This movie is good, but at some point, I don't really understand, what is inside the paper that wharton bring ;"(... the paper that change everything....plus I don't really get the ending, seems too short... i need more explanation.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of the Landmark Films of the 80s...A Landmark Film, Period
sts-2620 January 2008
Another Country was one of those films that both captured the spirit of an era and helped define it - in the best possible sense. While one can easily lump all 80s pop music and fashion together as over-styled and kitschy, it is not possible to do so with the films of that decade, certainly not the British ones, not with Chariots of Fire, Educating Rita, My Beautiful Launderette and Another Country so vividly remembered. These were works of art, perfectly weaving style and substance together. Another Country presents a complex tale with - what was/is to some - unpalatable subject matter, and indecipherable detail (the life of the British upper class is, and always was, amusing, bizarre, implausible. Gilbert and Sullivan built careers on this fact). Yet, there is no sign of attempts to simplify, or strip out the seemingly unnecessarily intricate, or to moralize - either way - beyond the context of the story, the homosexuality depicted. The result is a film that is detailed, rich, compelling and (in a strange way, despite the historical facts upon which the story is based) apolitical.
33 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Homosexuals: Amusing but never happy.
mark.waltz14 July 2021
Warning: Spoilers
That's the point of view of a very elegant British lady who turns out to be the mother of one, Rupert Everett, a Cambridge student who ends up becoming a spy. Sure enough, a young student discovered to be dallying with a boy from another school makes that seem true after he hangs himself, but Everett is doing best to keep his feelings to himself. That becomes nearly impossible when he catches the eye of the sweet looking Cary Elwes, and a romantic dinner in public confirms that the attraction is mutual. The head of the student body insists that such incidents cannot occur again, and the camera focuses on a student who is obviously against that not happening. Everett and Elwes do more talking about life and the world and their experiences than showing their affection, but it's obvious that something between the two is building.

This is more a history lesson starting in the early 1930's than a gay love story, utilizing conflict over the young men's sexuality to guide along their destiny, showing the world of the affluent uppercrust and how political views were formed during a vulnerable period of time for young men trying to find themselves. A young Colin Firth is the communist supporting student whose extremist views rub off on Everett. It's obviously a changing world which the audience gets to see through the greenery surrounding the stuffy world of Cambridge, and for those familiar with the gay references that Lord Robert Grantham made on "Downton Abbey", you can see why some had acceptance in a lightly liberal way and others were violently repulsed even by the hint of homosexuality.

Gorgeous physical locations abound aides this in revealing details only dealt with in passing, and my issue with the film is that it's a lot of exposition and little plot during the first half of the movie. So those expecting a period gay romance will not get their wish, but it's very clear that this is meant to be something a little deeper than that. Coming out during the rising years of the Merchant Ivory type films like "The Europeans", "Quartet" and "The Bostonians", this is similarly in tune with them, but this is far more political than social, so viewers should be a bit more mature than I was when I first saw this in my mid 20's, because 30+ years later, I get it a lot more which has caused me to change my overall rating.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Rupert Everett in old-man's make-up provides the only laugh in the picture
moonspinner555 March 2001
Unrelieved stuffiness, written by Julian Mitchell from his play, chronicling the true-life account of homosexual prep-school lad Guy Bennett in 1930s London who later became a spy for the Russians. Director Marek Kanievska chooses to sequence the film colorlessly in flashback, with aloof Rupert Everett posturing and pursing his modulated lips in continual pensiveness (he has one expression to express every emotion). The British play was very popular, for reasons which are not evident here. The burnished cinematography by Peter Biziou and fine supporting performances from Colin Firth (in his debut) and Cary Elwes do help, yet I found this picture extremely cold and rather indifferently-made. * from ****
10 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Etiology of Rebellion
gradyharp20 June 2005
Warning: Spoilers
In 1983 Julian Mitchell wrote a play based on fact about a young man (Guy Bennett) who, seeing the constraints of British society circa 1930, embraces his sexuality in a time when even the words were criminal, sees through the sad folly of the British class and empire system, and eventually abandons England to become a spy for Russia. The played starred a young 21-year-old Rupert Everett and a 20-year-old Kenneth Branagh as Guy's heterosexual roommate Tommy Judd, an obsessed Marxist as ready to leap out of the norm of British society as Guy - but for different reasons. Director Marek Kanievska adapted Mitchell's challenging play for the screen, and in 1984 ANOTHER COUNTRY became a sterling recreation of the play and a controversial film introducing the extraordinarily talented and continuingly popular Rupert Everett (who remains one of the few 'out' actors enjoying success in Hollywood). Colin Firth assumed the role of Tommy and Cary Elwes became the gay love interest for Everett's Guy Bennett. The film is one of the finest examinations of the rigid, archaically proper British schools for young men (Eton) where class is paramount in importance, rank reigns, and medieval views of sexuality and out of line thought are treated with public corporal punishment and (worst of all!) the inability to rise in the ranks of the 'important' lads. Throughout the film there is a powerful parallel between Guy's striving to become the head of the class being thwarted by his pursuing is passion for his love of men, and the 'religious zeal' approach of Tommy's absorption in Marxism, seeing Communism as the only way to correct the 'vile sickness' of current British politics and social strata. The undercurrents of bigotry are brought into focus when a fine young lad (Martineau) is caught in a sexual act with one of his classmates and is shamed into hanging himself. And when Guy's sexual tryst with James Harcourt is 'discovered', Guy is beaten in front of his compatriots, prompting him to see (with Tommy in agreement) the dead-end of British society and leave the remnants of a once glorious empire behind.

As a delightful Special Feature on this very well made DVD there is a scene from the stage production in the year prior to the film, and the dialogue between Rupert Everett and Kenneth Branagh is incisive and brilliant. This film is a masterpiece, not only in the screenplay, but also in the sensitive direction, the exquisite cinematography, and the amazingly superb acting of not only Everett and Firth, but of the entire large cast. An absolutely brilliant film.
63 out of 73 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The best part about it was the setting
bcolohan-9484729 October 2019
But for the scenes taken inside the charming, old universities, this film was a bust for me. It was all about Guy Bennett's homosexuality and his need to fulfill his desires, pursuing other young men. The other was Tommy Judd playing the Marxist wannabe. If you enjoy watching a man fawning over another man, this is your film.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Another Country
jboothmillard14 August 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I remember seeing clips of this film in Piers Morgan's Life Stories, during which they discussed that the two leads did not get on during filming, but they have worked together a few times since, and I became interested in watching it. Basically, set in the 1930s, at Eton College, a boys' public school in Eton, Berkshire, Guy Bennett (BAFTA nominated Rupert Everett) and Tommy Judd (Colin Firth) are pupils. They are friends and both outsiders in their own ways, because Bennett is gay, and Judd is a Marxist. One day, a teacher walks in on Martineau (Philip Dupuy) and a boy from another house masturbating each other. The teachers and the senior pupils want the scandal to stay secret from the parents and the outside world, and Martineau subsequently hangs himself. The gay scandal however gives the army-obsessed house Captain Fowler (Tristan Oliver), who hates Bennett and Judd, a reason to scheme against them. He wants to stop Bennett from becoming a top prefect, or a "God" as pupils refer to it. Bennett is open about his homosexuality with fellow students and believes James Harcourt (Cary Elwes) to be his first love. Fowler gets hold of a love note from Bennett to Harcourt, which is given to teachers, and Bennett agrees to be punished with a caning, to avoid Harcourt also facing punishment. Previously, Bennett had avoided punishment by blackmailing the other "Lords", threatening to reveal their own experiences with him. Meanwhile, Judd is reluctant to become a prefect, he does not participate in what he considered the oppression of school traditions. He makes a memorable, bitter speech about how the boys oppressed by the system grow up to be the fathers who maintain it. Eventually, however, he agrees to become a prefect to prevent the hateful Fowler from becoming Head of House. But this does happen as Donald Devenish (Rupert Wainwright) agrees to stay at school and stops Bennett from becoming a prefect. Devastated at the loss of his cherished dream of becoming a "God", Bennett comes to realise that the British class system strongly relies on outward appearance and that being openly gay is a severe hindrance if he intends to become a diplomat. Years later, Bennett defected to Russia and became a spy for the Soviet Union, while Judd died fighting in the Spanish Civil War; the elderly Bennett, living in Moscow, tells his story to American journalist Julia Schofield (Betsy Brantley). Also starring Michael Jenn as Barclay, Robert Addie as Delahay, Rupert Wainwright as Devenish, and Anna Massey as Imogen Bennett. Everett could have had a much bigger career, he gives a splendid performance as the gay public schoolboy who later in life became a spy, and there is good support from Firth and Elwes. I'm not going to pretend I was paying the fullest attention, but I got the main point of the film was to show how being gay in school at the time was punishable which is disgraceful, it has terrific cinematography, an interesting drama. It was nominated the BAFTAs Film Award for Best Adapted Screenplay, and Best Editing. Rupert Everett was number 39 and Colin Firth number 9 on The 50 Greatest British Actors. Good!
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Very neurotic
borgolarici9 March 2022
A rather stiff tale from the good old Britain that doesn't exist anymore (and probably never existed as pictured in the movie), filled with neurotic people obsessed with social class and formalities.

It's not all bad because Everett and his sweetheart make a cute couple, but the slow pacing doesn't really help.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Good acting in small drama
Boyo-230 October 2000
Every actor in the movie is perfectly suited to their character, and you can't day that about every movie you see.

Rupert is in love with a ray of sunshine in the human form of Cary Elwes, and Colin is screaming for the revolution to begin. The movie is about them, what living in England at the time would have been like, and what living in a boys school was like also.

The boys seem to accept Rupert because it is widely assumed that he will grow out of it. When he declares it as a way of life, his unhappiness begins. He is able to be friends with Colin Firth because they are both outcasts in their way ("The Commie and the queer" is how he describes them at one point").

The movie is very enjoyable and it is worth a look. You've spent ninety minutes doing stupider things than watching this.
26 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Makes me engaged in history
jimmytfallinj4 September 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Initially I went into this movie with absolutely no idea what was going to go on other than that one of the characters was going to be gay. I decided to feel my way blindly through it, and did so happily as I'm a fan of Firth's work. I'm happy to say it exceeded any expectations I could have had, and that it's one of those impressionable movies you think about for weeks.

I never had seen Rupert Everett act in anything, so he was a new face to me. I found his character to be compelling, and quite loved the way he made him charming and witty, but brilliant and beautiful, too. Two of the best dialogues delivered in the movie were by Everett, and he delivered them with so much passion I almost cried.

The thing I loved the most about this movie was the friendship shared between Judd and Bennett. While most incredibly unlike, Judd and Bennett were united in their charm and their difference. Judd, a young communist, and Bennett, an openly gay man in a society so punishable of such acts. I found the relationship to be refreshing. The way Judd discredited Bennett's emotion as something unserious in one scene, and the way Bennett lashed at him and told him how unfair it was that he did that, was perhaps my favorite part. Both Firth and Everett delievered astounding performances for people that young, and I'm surprised this didn't propel Firth into stardom before Pride and Prejudice did. I absolutely recommend this to anyone interested in films like "Maurice" or "Call Me By Your Name" and only wish that it had more popularity; "Another Country" certainly is a hidden gem.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Classic
send4patrick14 January 2003
Warning: Spoilers
A quintessentially English film, with a style close to Brideshead Revisited.

Stunning privilege intertwined with acute suffering.

Haunting, trepid, futile, beautiful.

My favourite quote: Interviewer: Is there anything you miss about England? Guy: I miss the cricket.
13 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
It is 1980's Social Commentary
Tak0058 February 2021
Viewers are lead to believe that this story of the adolescent life of Guy Burgess will give an insight into why he became a traitor. The reality is this film is social commentary on the 1980s, when it was made. The principle theme is that of a gay person coping with a society that doesn't accept him for who he is. A theme which was very much coming to the for in the 80's. Together with the secondary characters espousing communist ideals and criticising the current social structure. Another theme discussed in anti Thatcher's Britain, where this movie was made, in the 80's. The acting is good all around. The script is intense and sometimes it is too clever and self indulgent. Not a bad film and worth a watch.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ambition vs. Principles -- which would you choose?
adkmilkmaid4 October 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Forget the premise that homosexuality was the reason Burgess became a spy... a dubious conclusion. This movie is about ambition and how far one is willing to sacrifice one's principles to achieve it. The premise is explicitly stated in the opening frames with the voice-over from the aged Guy Bennett (fictionalized Burgess): "You've no idea what life in England in the 1930s was like. Treason and loyalty... they're all relative, you know. Treason to what? Loyalty to whom? That's what matters."

It is the 1930s in a famous public school in England. Rupert Everett is the star turn as homosexual Guy Bennett, who longs to become a "God" (head boy) as a senior; Colin Firth plays the supporting role of his best friend Tommy Judd, a devout Communist. It was the first film for each actor and they're both terrific right out of the box.

While Guy (RE) is self-consciously theatrical (he refers grandly to a "tumescent archway") the dialogue between the two roommates is simple and real. In one scene Guy puts a quick move on Tommy (CF). He comes up behind Tommy, puts one hand over his eyes to pull his head back and with the other rapidly starts unbuttoning Tommy's pajama shirt.

G: Alone at last! T: (bored/amused) Get OFF. G: I'll get you one day. T: No you won't. G: Yes I will. Everyone gives in, in the end. It's Bennett's Law. T: I won't give in. G: Well, you're not normal. (later) G: The reason everyone gives in in the end is they get lonely, doing it on their own. They long for company. T: Well, I don't. Not your sort, anyway. G: (insisting) That's why my mother is marrying this awful Colonel person. T: It couldn't just possibly be that she loves him? G: Out of the question. He's got one of those awful little mustaches. Ghastly. Almost as much of a loather as my father was. T: (amused) You mean even you would draw the line? G: Don't be revolting. He's a grownup. T: Of course. And it's all just a passing phase. G: Exactly. Just like you being a Communist. T: (sarcastic) Ha ha. G: (pause) Judd-- T: Hmm? G: You and your usherette -- T: What about her? G: Is it really so different? T: From what? G: BOYS. T: Well how would I know? I've only ever had a girl.

The whole scene takes place as the boys are changing the linens on their bunks, going down to the laundry room, folding sheets, getting new ones. It's a great, understated scene. Tommy Judd is calmly not threatened by Guy's flamboyance and homosexuality. What resonates throughout the movie is the feeling of genuineness and honesty between these two in a cavernous school where everything is about power, leverage, and bullying.

The struggles in the movie concern ambition vs. principles. Guy is determined to be a God. Will Tommy sacrifice his principles for his friend's ambition? Will he sacrifice them simply for his friend? Meanwhile will Guy sacrifice his boyfriend for his own ambition?

T: I can't do it. I just cannot be a prefect. G: Why not? T: I do have my reputation, you know. G: (snorts) Your what? T: I'm a school joke, I quite realize that. But I am, don't you think, a respected joke? I do at least stick to my principles. People appreciate that. I abandon them now --

and he winds himself up into a passionate speech about how people will think he's a fake, Communists are fake, and Stalin's a fake! He's almost in tears -- and then the head boy comes and he has to dive under a table (he and Guy are out of bed after hours)!

Finally: G: (speaking of the head boy): My God, that man is really cracking up. T: Liberals always do under pressure. G: You know, you're a really hard man, Tommy. T: I've no time for him. He just wants a nice easy life and a nice easy conscience. And he's got no right to either.

There are a lot more great exchanges. G: (sarcastically, about Communism) Heaven on Earth? T: (calmly) Earth on earth. A just earth.

The friendship between Guy Bennett and Tommy Judd seems far more touching and real -- far more the heart of the movie -- than the sketched-in affair between Guy and James Harcourt, the character played by Cary Elwes.

The whole production is filled with dewy, beautiful boys, starting with Everett, who at 24 is painfully gorgeous with his big eyes and ripe, petulant mouth. Firth at 23 has the sweetness of youth but otherwise is allowed to appear rather skinny and plain. (No eyebrows, hair standing on end, and 1930s round spectacles.) But his eyes glow with intensity and commitment. You totally believe his passion. Very tough to believe it was his first time in front of a camera.

The movie itself is far from perfect. Some might think it slow and rather precious. But the messages about ambition and loyalty are timeless, and the Everett/Firth scenes are wonderful.
16 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A Gay Character, Not A Gay Movie
A_Guy_Named_Rick16 October 2005
I haven't seen this movie in years. Perhaps it's time to watch it again. I was just looking at the credits and realized how many big names were in it. At the time, I didn't know any of them.

The movie is visually stunning, with beautiful cinematography. And the actors aren't a burden to watch.

One of the striking memories for me was that this was perhaps the first movie I ever say with an unapologetic portrayal of homosexuality, but the movie wasn't really (to my mind) *about* homosexuality. It was one facet of a gay character's personality, and it was addressed as a personality component that manifests differently for different people. For some, it is a phase. For others, a burden. For others still, just a fact.

This is not an hour and a half you'll want back when it's over.
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
"no commies and no queers . . . "
Phillim21212 August 2021
Fictional dramatization of 1930s English boys' boarding school romance and repression that planted the seeds among some young aristocrats to later commit espionage against their country on behalf of the Soviet Union. Based on a stage play, the script is at turns vicious and charming, but always literate, always smart. Fine performances from all the young actors, some who went on to brilliant careers. The film works a bit of a miracle: makes us care about the central self-absorbed young dandy and his ambitions to rise in the hierarchy of his school as stepping stone to rising in the hierarchy of his privileged class.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed