I Married a Shadow (1983) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
It may pay at times to be a little dishonest, but be sure your heel of a husband doesn't find out
Terrell-430 January 2008
Warning: Spoilers
"Who are you?" "What do you want?" "Where did you come from?" Most people getting these anonymous notes in the mail would either throw them away or give them to the police. Things are more difficult for Patricia Meyrand, a young widow with a new baby who is living with the family of her dead husband, a family she had not met before the train crash which took his life. Patricia Meyrand is really Helene George (Nathalie Baye). She was eight months pregnant when her heel of a husband threw her out. She bought a train ticket to Bordeaux for no reason except to get away. Just before that train crash she was befriended by Patricia Meyrand, also eight months pregnant, who was traveling with her husband to meet the Meyrand family. When Helene woke up in hospital, she had given birth...and everyone has assumed she was Patricia, and that her husband and "Helen" had been killed. At first she resists and tries to leave, but then she realizes she has no money, no future and a baby to care for. When the Meyrand family accepts her as their son's widow, she thinks she can start a new life.

The Meyrands are wealthy wine makers, with groves of vineyards and a fine château. Mrs. Meyrand is, perhaps, distant at first, but we soon learn she is very ill with little time left to live. Mr. Meyrand is gracious and solicitous. And their remaining son, Pierre (Francis Huster) seems friendly enough. As the weeks pass, however, it is apparent to them that this Patricia amongst the Meyrands seems to have almost no recollection of her own life, or how she met her husband...and this seems strange, especially to Mrs. Meyrand. What may seem stranger still is the evident feelings Pierre is beginning to show toward Patricia. Lust or love? And, of course, there is the question of the ownership of the château and vineyards. One-third is now Patricia's.

We would be inattentive movie goers if, by now, we hadn't realized that the heel of a husband who threw Helen out and whom we haven't seen since is played by the well-known actor Richard Bohringer who received third billing. For the first two-thirds of I Married a Dead Man, we have been watching an engrossing story of a young woman, down on her luck who made some bad choices, but who, in choosing to be Patricia Meyrand, may have made a good choice. She wasn't honest, but she has done no real harm. When her low-life husband appears, however, he is uninterested in her or their baby, only in the money she can give him if he keeps her secret. Now the possibility of murder begins to raise it's bloody eyes. But so does the extent of acceptance and love which Patricia/Helene has given to and received from the Meyrands.

The movie is based on the novel, I Married a Dead Man, by Cornell Woolrich writing as William Irish. Woolrich was a master of that great and unique genre, American pulp crime fiction. So is there a murder? Are you kidding? At least with this movie justice is done, although perhaps not entirely legally. For a Cornell Woolrich story, we wind up with a sunny and satisfying conclusion, even with a body that had to be disposed of.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Romantic Thriller
SMK-416 February 1999
Here we have a rare genre mix, Thriller and Romance - and I'm not talking about a Thriller with a love interest, or a Romance with a thrilling element. The film is genuinely both.

Nathalie Baye is excellent in the lead as the pregnant woman who survives a train crash and is mistaken for somebody else. She has good reasons to go along with this charade and part of the plot develops delightfully in the While You Were Sleeping mode. Baye's past is coming to haunt her though, giving the film an extra hard edge.

In some sense it's the kind of film US television companies would like to make but always fail.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A well crafted thriller that also happens to be a charming love story.
kinsayder21 February 2006
Nathalie Baye plays the fiancée of a bully (Richard Bohringer in one of his trademark creepy bad guy roles). She is suddenly given the opportunity to start a new life by assuming the identity of a dead woman, and she takes it. But of course it's not going to be that easy...

The choice of Nathalie Baye as the lead is important for the tone of the film. With another actress, say Isabelle Adjani, we would be in completely different territory, questioning the heroine's motives as she settles into her new and immensely wealthy "family". But Baye has such a guileless sweetness, you find yourself rooting for her even when she's sticking a knife in someone's chest. Francis Huster is well cast, too, as the romantic lead whose ambiguous behaviour (has he guessed her secret?) fuels much of the suspense during the middle section of the film.

Despite the corny plot and the melodramatic elements, the film has a very satisfying pace and mood (enhanced by the lovely soundtrack and the glorious Bordeaux setting). It may be a disappointment to fans of the much darker novel but, as Robin Davis explains in his DVD commentary, it was never his intention to make a faithful adaptation or a typical noir thriller. He changed the story because he cared too much about the characters to abandon them without hope.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Irish nadir.
dbdumonteil10 September 2001
This one may be the worst of all Irish's (Cornell Woolrich's) adaptation for the screen.Not because they have transposed the action from California to the vineyards of Bordeaux,but because they totally betrayed the novel.Robin Davis ,a thoroughly faceless director, could not render Irish's doomed atmosphere to the slightest extent.The dialogue is mean,poor,repetitive,Richard Boringer,the villain,is reduced to repeat almost the same lines three times.The conclusion becomes an happy end,forgetting the terrible final lines of the novel,something like:"We've lost.That's all I know.We've lost.And now the game is over." Irish's tragic tale of fatality is turned into a soap opera .Natalie Baye could have been the character,had she found the adequate team. The only comedian on the screen who generates some emotion is veteran Madeleine Robinson.This was a blockbuster in France,but ,alas, almost nobody read the book.Do it,and avoid this bland movie.

NB :A new adaptation ,"Mrs Winterbourne" (1996) ,is worse.The best,by far ,is Mitchell Leisen's "No man of her own" starring Barbara Stanwyck.
4 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The original Version, in French, is far superior to the dubbed version
jannya7 June 2000
I saw this film during its original theatrical release, and it haunted me for years. I searched it out constantly, but only recently has it appeared on video. The original version, in French, is terrific: moody, sexy, and moving. The dubbed version is tacky; the trite language is reminiscent of a fifties, English-dubbed Japanese monster movie. If you have seen only the dubbed version, get the original. You'll be happily surprised. A real treat, seeing this film so many years after it was made, is the appearance, very prominently, of the Gipsy Kings. I don't know if they were popular in Europe in 1982, but they were unknown here.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Romantic thriller owes much to "No Man Of Her Own"
Alfonso-27 March 1999
This moody romantic thriller owes its entire plot to a little known and never released on video thus far film,"No Man Of Her Own" starring Barbara Stanwyck as a pregnant woman who after a train accident is mistaken for a rich young man's wife, they both died in the accident but her troubled past comes back to haunt her. This is the same plot of this film but Nathalie Baye is no Barbara Stanwyck. Decent effort nonetheless. Also Remade as "Mrs.Winterbourne" with Ricki Lake and Shirley Mcclaine.
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Pleasant enough
nicholas.rhodes9 November 2001
This film is based on an American Novel and was made in France. Whilst French Cinema was good on crime thriller films amongst others, they don't know how to make romantic films like the Americans ! If the same subject had been dealt with by an American cinematographer, the result would have been better. That said, I enjoyed this film because of its nice theme music, the beautiful Nathalie Baye, the rolling Medoc countryside and the pure kindness of Guy Tréjean. I also like Véronique Genest and Madeleine Robinson. Bohringer is another kettle of fish so to speak by there again he has a dirty role. Probably unknown outside France, the world won't come to an end if you don't get round to seeing this one !!!
5 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Unmoved
jcappy18 February 2008
Warning: Spoilers
A middling movie---either good or not good, depending on the viewer, but not more and not less. 5.5-6.6 range (if you're not taken in by the music). One thing is certain: it doesn't live up to its title. In fact, it seems the opposite of it--as about as far from noir as you can get. That is, very conventional in both plot, character, place. This can only be ascribed to the director and his obvious need to make a movie that would ruffle no one's feathers. But there's more to his problem than that--the characters are too flat, over-directed, or subject to stock interactions. They seem to be either too restrained or too placed in some clichéd opposition--the triangle love thing, for example.

Part of the problem arises from personalizing a story which must be larger. The only peep at the world we get are the industrial cityscape around Frank's job, and then in his second coming at Bordeaux he seems to let into the château's ordered environment some of the conflicted world. To me, the best scene in the movie is Patricia's wild scream upon yanking open the door--on his mug. Hey, some genuine dramatic energy--and Frank provides a bit more of this before his quick demise. But in general, the nice characters inhabit too nice a world, and are bound to too nice an end in which nature, love, and joy of tradition are confirmed by a few personages on a rural estate.

So how is it good? It has its moments, and it has three good actors who make them happen. Baye's performance is obviously the most convincing--and at moments special. But it can be unnerving---Patricia cannot lie, and she cannot tell the truth, so talk is out and when she does speak this can cause dead space and produce much self-castigation in the Meyrands. Mrs. Meyrand (Madeleine Robinson) is also steady and direct, and some of the scenes between this son-loving woman and Patricia express an unusual warmth, and commonality, (more so than Patricia's with Pierre--he seems too directed and stiff). Frank (Richard Bohringer), Helen's slimy cynic of a husband, lucks out on some good lines toward the end and brings them off. Oh yes and the winery worker girlfriend, Fido, does have some snap--and brings a bit of the world to bear on this closely controlled drama.

That's about it. Since the movie is pretty bereft of self-questioning or ideas, that tends to limit, methinks, discussion.
0 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed