"The BBC Television Shakespeare" Henry VIII (TV Episode 1979) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
The Wolsey Story
bkoganbing16 February 2011
Although this play of Shakespeare is given the title The Famous History Of The Life Of Henry VIII, the king is really a supporting figure. It covers that period in the reign of that monarch where Cardinal Thomas Wolsey was his chief minister and how he fell from power.

John Stride plays Henry VIII and he hasn't gotten to be the obese and overblown figure as made famous Charles Laughton. He's still lean and limber, in fact the young Henry as prince and king was something of an athlete and not just a sexual one. But this is about the time that Henry VIII is starting to get concerned over the lack of a male heir. His wife, the pious and virtuous Catherine of Aragon played by Claire Bloom has only given him a daughter Mary who has survived to adulthood. And England has not had a queen regnant since Matilda back in the 12th century.

Timothy West plays Wolsey who tried to balance too many balls in the air and ended up dropping everything. If he could have pulled it off he might have gone down as the greatest statesman of the middle ages. As it was he's ranked pretty high. If you recall the film Becket, Richard Burton tried being both the king's chancellor and the head of the Catholic church as Archbishop of Canterbury. He found the conflict irreconcilable and chose the church and ultimately sainthood. Wolsey tried to do both and was reaching for even more, he wanted to be Pope.

To explain the political situation at the time would involve me writing a small book. But coming into play in this whole situation besides Wolsey's own ambition and Henry's desire to have a male heir is the power politics of the Hapsburgs and their Emperor Charles V who with his German possessions and Spanish Empire was ruling over the largest bit of real estate ever controlled by one man and Francis I, the Valois King of France. Those two jockeyed for power in Europe and Charles won. And Charles was the nephew of Catherine Of Aragon and he wasn't about to see his aunt get dumped just so Henry could have a son and get a little good nookie the pious old queen wasn't giving out any more. Charles also after the battle of Pavia where the French were decisively beaten was the de facto ruler of the Italian peninsula, including Rome and the Pope danced to whatever tune the Hapsburgs played.

So Wolsey kept trying to cut deals for Henry's annulment and to advance himself and in the end got neither. And he lived high on the hog himself as Renaissance cardinals tended to do.

As the real central character of this play, Timothy West does a fine job as Wolsey. It's a complex character that West takes on and masters. Wolsey is a man of many parts, a statesman, a politician, a priest and a bit of a rake himself. He sent a few people to their deaths in the political power plays of the time, but he wasn't a man consumed with settling scores. He was just a guy who took on too many jobs and couldn't reconcile his various roles. In the end that's what his downfall was all about.

This was the last of Shakespeare's historical works and it ends with the baptism of the woman who would be Will Shakespeare's number one patroness, the Princess Elizabeth. All though the play hewed more close than most of his other works to the Tudor historical interpretation, still it's an entertaining piece, driven by Timothy West's Cardinal Wolsey.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Slick production, shame about the play
alainenglish8 April 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Bring his Histories cycle to a close, "Henry VIII" effectively ends the story begun way back in "Richard II". If one thinks of "King John" as a prologue to Shakespeare's history plays, this then is the epilogue as the play is as near to contemporary as Shakespeare could get away with at the time. Despite strong production values in this BBC version, this is not one of Shakespeare's better works, dependent more on talky intrigue than action or fun wordplay.

The plot concerns Henry VIII (John Stride) and his divorce from his queen Katharine of Aragorn (Claire Bloom) as well as his courting and marriage to Anne Bullen (Barbara Kellerman). All the while, however, he is dodging the Machiavellian intrigues of the devious Cardinal Wolsey (Timothy West) who ruthlessly uses his influence at the royal court to improve his own standing with the Vatican in Rome, removing anyone who gets in his way...

This production was shot on location in English castles and locations around Middle England and as a result looks fantastic, the period costumes blending in seamlessly with the surroundings.

The play is well-acted throughout with a clutch of fantastic performances including John Stride as the ferociously independent monarch, Claire Bloom as Katharine of Aragorn, as well as Timothy West turning in a complex portrait of the treacherous Cardinal. Julian Glover gets an excellent cameo as the doomed Lord Buckingham, and eagle-eyed viewers will spot a young John Rhys Davies ("Lord of the Rings" and "Raiders of the Lost Ark") as a messenger who consoles a stricken Katharine of Aragorn.

By the end of the play, Elizabeth I (the reigning English monarch for most of Shakespeare's life) is born to a joyful Henry and the closing scene with the King, his daughter and his proud courtiers brings things to a grand conclusion.

Overlong and uninspired, this nevertheless necessary conclusion to the history plays is still a must for Shakespeare buffs, worth comparing to the recent picture "The Other Boleyn Girl", which covers the same period from a very different angle.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Well done, unlike its predecessors/successors
flash-10417 March 2013
Warning: Spoilers
This play was done in the BBC Shakespeare's first season (produced by Cedric Messina) and tried to be pleasant, realistic, and faithful—unlike the plays which precede it chronologically, done in the fifth season under Shaun Sutton, which were deliberately ugly (trying to look like "playground squabbles" but more like an abandoned lumber yard) and incompetently and trendily directed. This production was filmed competently on realistic locations with suitable costumes; the cinematography shows its age, though, on a high-resolution screen. The actors are all excellent, and Claire Bloom as Henry's (minor spoiler) divorced wife is magnificent.     The play itself, though, is relatively weak; it was mostly written by John Fletcher, and Shakespeare's parts are weak, "sometimes downright careless in syntax," as the Pelican Shakespeare notes. It is full of Shakespeare's usual special pleading for history's winners—especially ironic for a play whose original title seems to have been "All is True." But parts of it are excellent, and the whole is well worth watching. If you're viewing the plays in the proper order, this one will come as a great relief after the botched Henry VI's and Richard III, and an excellent culmination to Shakespeare's double tetralogy. It shows what the BBC could have accomplished had it kept its original agreement with the series' sponsors to do authentic Shakespeare.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Splendor! For Once, A Production Better Than The Play
tonstant viewer24 December 2006
Most of the time, we wind up making excuses for these BBC Shakespeares. Limited preparation time, studio sets instead of real locations, uneven casting, memories of other, better performances....

Here is a production to knock your eyes out. If TV studio production confuses you and you want physical reality, here it is. Exteriors were videotaped at two castles, interiors at a third. With a winter shoot, the actors' breath condensation is visible outdoors and occasionally in-, while the rich, colorful costumes are enhanced by the solidity of the settings. There is a masque by torchlight that is nothing short of magical. But the visual design never descends to Franco Zeffirelli-style overstuffed hyper-literalism.

This is one of only two BBC Shakespeares that were shot outside the studio. The other was "As You Like It," and I didn't. In that play, the Forest of Arden dwarfed the actors. Here, the location work enhanced the play. Unfortunately, it was also very expensive, and for budgetary reasons the rest of the cycle was returned to the studio.

As Tony Church intones the opening Prologue, the verbal rhythms are somehow different from what we expect. The glory of the language comes and goes throughout, and it turns out that about half the scenes were written by John Fletcher, Shakespeare's successor with the King's Men. But half a Shakespeare is better than none, and this video is one of the best executed in the series.

The actors are all excellent and some more so. You get the chance to boo two of the choicest villains of their generation, Timothy West of the permanent scowl, and Peter Vaughan of the Nutcracker profile. Claire Bloom is terrific as Katherine of Aragon. She is apparently unable to hit a false note in Shakespeare, and her two confrontations with Timothy West as Cardinal Wolsey are devastating.

John Stride fits the bill as Henry, and Barbara Kellerman shows Anne Boleyn as considerably more than a simpering virgin. Ronald Pickup as Cranmer has a rather strange, spooky affect, but he gets points for successfully delivering his big speech while holding a squalling infant. The supporting roles are consistently strong. And though this is a long play, it never feels slow, thanks to Kevin Billington's direction. Would that I could say that about all of these shows, but I can't.

The low IMDb user vote on this video is statistically skewed. If you remove the 5 outlying "1"s from disgruntled schoolchildren, you'll find the vote is deservedly one of the highest in the series. Well done!
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Touches a high point of greatness
TheLittleSongbird11 January 2019
Have made a point a few times about the BBC Television Shakespeare being an interesting series for seeing so many talented actors and seeing the plays, familiar and not so familiar, adapted and performed relatively faithfully on the whole. Some are better than others, with not every performance in the series working and there could be issues with low budget production values and in some productions stage direction.

'The Famous History of the Life of Henry the Eighth' is one of the best of the series. One of not many performances where there wasn't anything to me that stood out as wrong, whereas even the other "one of the better" productions have one or two reservations. Also agree that it is one of the (very) few BBC Television Shakespeare productions to be much better than the play it's based on, when it comes to Shakespeare that is a near-unheard of feat. The play has interesting characters, but the story doesn't have the same amount of meat and engagement, by Shakespeare standards it's fairly dull, and even Shakespeare's language doesn't see him at his most inspired. All of these are miraculously brought to life and fully fleshed out in 'The Famous History of Henry the Eighth'.

It is one of the better-looking productions visually, being one of only two of the series, the other being 'As You Like It' (better than credit for to me but nowhere near as good still) to be shot on location so the action feels opened up and not confined. The locations have a real sense of period and you would be hard pressed to find more colourful more beautifully tailored costumes in the series than the ones here. The masque is indeed sheer magic. The use of music was lovely, couldn't question any of the placements and it is lovely music in its own right.

On a stage direction level, it is one of the main reasons as to why 'The Famous History of the Life of Henry the Eighth' is one of the series' best. It has tension, intrigue and emotion throughout, and sometimes not in an overt way. It is not only because the energy is never lost, it's never static, it is always tasteful with no pointless touches and that it never resorts to overblown excess that swamps everything else. It's also because of the subtleties and the details, big and small, where the characters are so well fleshed out (Katherine and Wolsey especially) motivations are clear and everything seems to happen for a reason and not randomly.

All the performances are top-drawer, with as others have said the acting honours going to a dignified and moving Claire Bloom and Timothy West mastering Wolsey's complex character. John Stride gets Henry VIII in personality and manner spot on, even if not the most ideal physically. Ronald Pickup is a noble Cramner and Barbara Kellerman was a pleasant surprise as Anne, alluring and never passive and by Kellerman standards the performance is pretty restrained which is great.

Concluding, wonderful and one of the best in the series. 10/10 Bethany Cox
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Brilliant adaptation and a wonderful recreation of the period
cigmanmark10 March 2002
I loved this film. It is good in almost every way. The acting is great (Claire Bloom as Queen Catherine and Timothy West as Wolsey were particularly good) as you would expect from a BBC film but as well as that it was actually filmed on location at Penhurst Place, Dover Castle and Leeds Castle and there are some wonderful costumes. Sometimes, what you see on the screen looks like a painting of the time come to life. Also, there is a lot of music from the period and one of the songs ("Orpheus and His Lute" I think) was sung by Emma Kirkby. The only thing about it that I don't think is brilliant is the play itself. It is a bit dull, especially when listened to on audio cassete and even more so when reading it. However in this adaptation, the play and the characters come to life.

I don't know why the BBC don't release "The Complete Dramatic Works of William Shakespeare" series, on video. The ones I've watched have all been very good and have some very well known British actors
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Shakespeare as a courtesan
Dr_Coulardeau27 November 2016
Warning: Spoilers
This is certainly not a great play by Shakespeare. The objective is to celebrate the birth and christening of Elizabeth and to position this birth in a context which is difficult. So it shows the conflicts with the Catholic Church, in fact with some top people in the Catholic Church, particularly Cardinal Wolsey who served, as the main minister of the King, his own purposes as the cardinal of York in his position and even some rivalry inherited from the past, for example in his plot to have Buckingham executed, the son of the Buckingham who helped Richard III to ascend to the throne and then got executed by decision of the same Richard III, of the House of York. At least that's how it appears in the play.

In fact there is a second stake which is the divorce with Catherine of Aragon. The conflict is a conflict with the Pope and it is evoked but not really explored and the main consequence is not even mentioned, the fact that the Catholic Church is disbanded in England and replaced by the Church of England governed by a special Council appointed by the King but the logic in this Council is the same as in the Catholic Church: the fight against the Reformation and Protestantism, in one word heresies. The King supports the Archbishop of Canterbury who is leaning towards some moderate reformation, though nothing is made that clear in the play, and this Archbishop is going to be entrusted with the leading role in the Church of England. But the play is totally silent on the main reform that is going to disband the congregations and take over the churches.

So it is entertaining but not really good. There is not even some kind of deeper political wisdom with a King that is often angry and authoritarian, when he is not parading and showing off. At the same time the final christening "sermon" is not exactly possible, credible, believable and simply modest.

"CRANMER, Archbishop of Canterbury: Let me speak, sir, For heaven now bids me; and the words I utter Let none think flattery, for they'll find 'em truth. This royal infant--heaven still move about her!-- Though in her cradle, yet now promises Upon this land a thousand thousand blessings, Which time shall bring to ripeness: she shall be-- But few now living can behold that goodness-- A pattern to all princes living with her, And all that shall succeed: Saba was never More covetous of wisdom and fair virtue Than this pure soul shall be: all princely graces, That mould up such a mighty piece as this is, With all the virtues that attend the good, Shall still be doubled on her: truth shall nurse her, Holy and heavenly thoughts still counsel her: She shall be loved and fear'd: her own shall bless her; Her foes shake like a field of beaten corn, And hang their heads with sorrow: good grows with her: In her days every man shall eat in safety, Under his own vine, what he plants; and sing The merry songs of peace to all his neighbours: God shall be truly known; and those about her From her shall read the perfect ways of honour, And by those claim their greatness, not by blood. Nor shall this peace sleep with her: but as when The bird of wonder dies, the maiden phoenix, Her ashes new create another heir, As great in admiration as herself; So shall she leave her blessedness to one, When heaven shall call her from this cloud of darkness, Who from the sacred ashes of her honour Shall star-like rise, as great in fame as she was, And so stand fix'd: peace, plenty, love, truth, terror, That were the servants to this chosen infant, Shall then be his, and like a vine grow to him: Wherever the bright sun of heaven shall shine, His honour and the greatness of his name Shall be, and make new nations: he shall flourish, And, like a mountain cedar, reach his branches To all the plains about him: our children's children Shall see this, and bless heaven. […] She shall be, to the happiness of England, An aged princess; many days shall see her, And yet no day without a deed to crown it. Would I had known no more! but she must die, She must, the saints must have her; yet a virgin, A most unspotted lily shall she pass To the ground, and all the world shall mourn her." (Act V Scene v)

And we have to keep in mind the play was written in 1612-1613, that is to say ten years after Elizabeth I's death and under James I. Is it only to mark the anniversary of this death, or is it because under James I some things started very fast to turn sour? We cannot know.

Dr Jacques COULARDEAU
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Not the Greatest Shakespeare, but 'Twill Serve (and Serves Well)
joe-pearce-111 July 2018
Henry VIII has never been considered one of Shakespeare's greatest plays (he wrote only about half of it), thus I have never seen a production of it before, nor had I ever even read it. It appears I have missed much. Watching this BBC production, I was fully enveloped in all of the action from beginning to end, despite the play's being quite episodic in nature. The main thing is that all of the lead characters (and there are a good seven or eight) are, to my mind, fully developed within the confines of the drama, with Cardinal Wolsey, Katherine of Aragon, the ill-fated Duke of Buckingham, and the Archbishop of Canterbury particularly so. The production is beautiful to see, as well, having been where possible filmed in the actual locations where the drama took place. However, the glory of this production is in its performances. There is not one, even of the most minor characters, that does not ring totally true. While John Stride does not have the imposing physical stature and rather overwhelming personality one might want of a still-young Henry (for that, you really need a Robert Shaw), he does impart a sense of command to all his utterances. As Henry seems to be somewhat less well-drawn by the author, that is a considerable achievement. But Julian Glover as Buckingham and Ronald Pickup as the Archbishop of Canterbury could hardly be bettered, both noble characters nobly interpreted. However, the true stars of this production are Timothy West as Cardinal Wolsey, and Claire Bloom as Katherine. West, always a powerful actor and surely one of the unsung heroes of his profession, is almost mesmerizing in all of the Cardinal's myriad moods and actions, some near heinous in nature, but all, we learn, intended for the greater good of both Henry and himself. When he falls from grace, there is no groveling or beating of breast, simply an understanding that he has attempted too much, gone too far, and is now (he thinks) consigned to the dustbin of history. That may be Shakespeare's doing, of course, but West impels a certain kind of understanding and even a bit of pity from the viewer. Foremost of all, though, is Claire Bloom's Katherine. This is one of the Bard's best-drawn dramatic female roles, one that dominates every scene she is in, and she does it full justice, as she has done to every role she has touched for the past 70 years (she was only a bit over 30 years into her career when this was done). Although always prized for her acting chops, Bloom seemed to be unrecognized as one of the great screen beauties of her day, so that she managed to almost always appear in superior work, whether it be in film, stage or television. I think the highlights of this entire film consist of her appearance before the judges when accused of possible infidelity and her rather prolonged but most effective death scene. I don't think Ashcroft, Dench, Redgrave or Mirren could have equaled her in those scenes, and they'd probably be the first to admit it. Anyway, this has been a learning experience for a lifelong Shakespeare devotee; now I know that the play is better than has been rumored about, and that it should be performed far more often than it has been. Bravo!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Less Innovative Than Others in the Series, But Poorer Source Material
d545427 April 2023
The acting is surprisingly quite good, and it is refreshing to see one of the BBC adaptations filmed on location instead of a sound stage, but those few positives do not save this mess of a production. Some who are not familiar with Shakespeare are wrongly lead to believe that he has never written a "bad" play, but there are several, and HENRY VIII is certainly one of them. It is utterly thin in drama and plot, and the stakes are never high. It could have been ever so slightly improved by a good cutting, but instead the producers opted to keep it intact, causing most scenes to have a severely slow pace. On top of that, the low budget was obvious and the cinematography suffered as a result. Everything was in shadow. The BBC has certainly done better adaptations.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Does the obsession of a male heir destroy the soul?
mark.waltz21 May 2022
Warning: Spoilers
The performance of Claire Bloom as Catherine of Aragon dominates this BBC adaption of the Shakespeare play I did not know existed. I know he had written about other members of the British royalty, but thought that Hank had been skipped over. The memories of Charles Laughton, Richard Burton and Keith Michell from previous filmed accounts of his life as well as other actors who played him after this was made dominated my thoughts, but it's the only time where Henry's first wife gets to dominate the story even if she isn't in every scene. Her soliloquy in the court of the king with Cardinal Wolsey present as one of the greatest moments I've seen about a real life person, and Bloom is mesmerizing.

As the youngish King Henry, redheaded John Stride isn't perhaps as bombastic as other actors had been in a roll, but that gives him a more human element, conflicted in many ways yet definitely a far too proud King and egotistical man of power. As Woolsey, Timothy West is definitely a standout, his conflict with Catherine of Aragon four friends in the drama yet filled with hidden guilts over his obvious misuse of his power. Barbara Kellerman doesn't say much as Anne Boleyn, but she certainly is a striking physical presence, with the last quarter of the play surrounding the pending birth of her first child who became Queen Elizabeth I. However, there is a lot of footage of Catherine after the divorce, ailing in her banishment yet determined to see her daughter Mary take her rightful place as the oldest child of Henry. A very handsome production design, well directed and never dull.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed