55 reviews
Sensual and tough Maria Braun. (Hanna Schygula) marries a soldier in the middle of World War II and spends a half of day and the whole night with him. That's how long her marriage lasts before she loses him to the war and then to prison. She carries on with her life, becomes a successful businesswoman being not only sensual but intelligent, ambitious, and willing to use sex whenever or wherever necessary: "I don't know a thing about business, but I do know what German women want. You might even say I'm an expert on it". While climbing up to the success she always remembers her husband, Hermann (her man) and convinces herself that whatever she does is for him, for their future happy life together. "Maria Braun"'s style reminds much of melodramas by Fassbinder's favorite Hollywood director, Douglas Sirk and offers a glimpse of the loss and survival in postwar Germany. Hanna Schygula literally shines in every scene of the movie and she is fantastic.
8.5/10
8.5/10
- Galina_movie_fan
- Oct 14, 2006
- Permalink
- rosscinema
- Nov 3, 2003
- Permalink
Allegory for postwar Germany...examination of modernist female sexuality...Marxist critique of human labor under capitalism...yada, yada. I won't bore you with that prattle. Which isn't to say those idea weren't baked into the movie or that you're wrong to see the movie as deeply philosophical. But it certainly isn't necessary to enjoying the movie.
The Marriage of Maria Braun is a great film without needing to be dissected as some dull academic thesis paper. Maria depicted quite spectacularly by Hanna Schygulla, she plays a character who I can't really decide is tragic or the real "villain." This is one of those weird films where every character is so endearing and well written that it's painful to see things go so off the rails for them.
Ending was a little obvious, and I could argue it was too dumb for the rest of the movie, but overall an amazing production.
The Marriage of Maria Braun is a great film without needing to be dissected as some dull academic thesis paper. Maria depicted quite spectacularly by Hanna Schygulla, she plays a character who I can't really decide is tragic or the real "villain." This is one of those weird films where every character is so endearing and well written that it's painful to see things go so off the rails for them.
Ending was a little obvious, and I could argue it was too dumb for the rest of the movie, but overall an amazing production.
We watched this film in our German Cinema class at university some years ago, and I still remember it well.
Without wishing to give too much away, it tells the tale of a woman who, seeing the desolate landscape that Germany was in 1945, determines to build herself a comfortable life and, as she does so, she becomes one of many women in Germany rebuilding the nation. This was a time, historically, when the women were a greater driving force in the social and economic rebuilding of the nation than were the men (who were both lacking in credibility following the horrors and the mess of the years past, and somewhat dazed by what the nation had just been through).
As she builds that life (and in so doing helps to rebuild the nation), however, she finds that she may have sacrificed too much.
It is a movie worth watching in order to gain some understanding of what life was like in Germany from 1945 to roughly 1970. Rainer Fassbinder makes use of images in places which show the transition of German society from broken ruins to economic superpower, the changing status of women in German society over that time period, the changing attitudes both within Germany and from outside toward Germany, and the sacrifices that women were prepared to make in order to build the Germany that they ultimately did. It also asks, though, if the single-minded pursuit of rebuilding the nation economically and materially did not take too much out of the nation and the people in other areas.
I enjoyed the movie, and am happy to recommend it.
Without wishing to give too much away, it tells the tale of a woman who, seeing the desolate landscape that Germany was in 1945, determines to build herself a comfortable life and, as she does so, she becomes one of many women in Germany rebuilding the nation. This was a time, historically, when the women were a greater driving force in the social and economic rebuilding of the nation than were the men (who were both lacking in credibility following the horrors and the mess of the years past, and somewhat dazed by what the nation had just been through).
As she builds that life (and in so doing helps to rebuild the nation), however, she finds that she may have sacrificed too much.
It is a movie worth watching in order to gain some understanding of what life was like in Germany from 1945 to roughly 1970. Rainer Fassbinder makes use of images in places which show the transition of German society from broken ruins to economic superpower, the changing status of women in German society over that time period, the changing attitudes both within Germany and from outside toward Germany, and the sacrifices that women were prepared to make in order to build the Germany that they ultimately did. It also asks, though, if the single-minded pursuit of rebuilding the nation economically and materially did not take too much out of the nation and the people in other areas.
I enjoyed the movie, and am happy to recommend it.
Maria Braun got married right in the middle of combat all around her and her husband Hermann. An explosion ripped through the building, to begin with, and she and Hermann had to sign the papers on a pile of rubble on the street. Perhaps this may strike some as a heavy-handed metaphor for what's about to come: marriage on the rocks, so to speak. It's a betrothal where the husband goes off to war and is held in a Russian prison camp, unbenownst to the helpless but hopeful and proud Maria, who keeps standing by the depressing rubble of the train station as some come home, others don't, with a sign awaiting Hermann.
Trouble arises, as happens in Rainer Werner Fassbinder's melodramas, and as its one of his best and most provocative, we see as Maria (uncommonly gorgeous Hanna Schygulla in this role) will do a two-face: she'll stand by her man, even if it means working at a bar for American GI's and, even still after she hears from a fellow soldier that Hermann has died will still stand by him as she sleeps with a black GI and comes close to bearing his child (that is, naturally, until he reappears and a murder occurs and he takes the rap so she can be safe), or working for a German businessman (effectively sympathetic Ivan Desny) and becoming his sometimes mistress and rising star in the company. Maria will do whatever it takes to be successful, but she'll always be married.
It's hard to say there's anything about Maria that isn't fascinating. Money, sex, power, all of these become interchangeable for Maria. She's like the feminist that has her cake and eats it with a sultry smile: she gets to have a husband, more or less (actually a lot less until the last ten minutes of the film) while obtaining things- a man who dotes on her whenever he can, a new and expensive house with servants, a secretary, money- that others around her aren't getting due to already being with a man or too weak in a position to rise anywhere (such as the secretary, played interestingly enough by Fassbinder's own mother).
Maria is sexy, confident, and all alone, with an idealized life going against a life that should be made in the shade. She says of the two men- the American soldier and poor old and sick Oswald- that she's fond of them, and at the same time will stick by those roses the confused and soul-searching husband Hermann sends from Canada, after being released from prison. She's casts a profile that a feminist would love to trounce, but understand where she's coming from and going all the way.
Fassbinder employs this inherent contradiction, and moments with Maria appear to go against the conventions of a melodrama (for example, Hermann walking in on the jubilant and half-naked Maria and GI is just about a masterpiece of a scene, with Maria's reaction not of surprise or guilt but pure happiness to see that he's there let alone alive), while sticking to his guns as a director of such high-minded technique with a storyline that should be predictable. But it isn't really. It's like one big metaphor for a country that, after the war, couldn't really move on to normalcy. A few times Fassbinder puts sound of the radio on in the background, and we see Maria walking around her family house, hustle and bustle going on around her, and the radio speaks of a divided Germany, of things still very unsettled, of a disarray. Maybe the only way to cope is excess, or maybe that's just my interpretation of it.
It's hard to tell, really, under Schygulla's stare face and eyes, anyway. It's such an incredible performance, really, one of those showstoppers that captures the glamor and allure of an old-time Hollywood female star while with the down-and-dirty ethic of a girl of the streets. Most telling are the opposing costumes one sees in one scene when she finally is with her husband, where she stars in one of those super-lustful black lingerie pieces and high heels, and then moves on to a dress without even thinking about it. That's almost the essence of what Maria is, and Schygulla wonderfully gets it down, a headstrong but somehow loving figure who is adored and perplexed by the men around her, sometimes in a single sentence. This is what Fassbinder captures in his wonderful first part of his "trilogy"; while I might overall prefer Veronika Voss as a masterpiece, Maria Braun is perhaps just as good as a character study, of what makes a woman tick and tock with (almost) nothing to lose.
Trouble arises, as happens in Rainer Werner Fassbinder's melodramas, and as its one of his best and most provocative, we see as Maria (uncommonly gorgeous Hanna Schygulla in this role) will do a two-face: she'll stand by her man, even if it means working at a bar for American GI's and, even still after she hears from a fellow soldier that Hermann has died will still stand by him as she sleeps with a black GI and comes close to bearing his child (that is, naturally, until he reappears and a murder occurs and he takes the rap so she can be safe), or working for a German businessman (effectively sympathetic Ivan Desny) and becoming his sometimes mistress and rising star in the company. Maria will do whatever it takes to be successful, but she'll always be married.
It's hard to say there's anything about Maria that isn't fascinating. Money, sex, power, all of these become interchangeable for Maria. She's like the feminist that has her cake and eats it with a sultry smile: she gets to have a husband, more or less (actually a lot less until the last ten minutes of the film) while obtaining things- a man who dotes on her whenever he can, a new and expensive house with servants, a secretary, money- that others around her aren't getting due to already being with a man or too weak in a position to rise anywhere (such as the secretary, played interestingly enough by Fassbinder's own mother).
Maria is sexy, confident, and all alone, with an idealized life going against a life that should be made in the shade. She says of the two men- the American soldier and poor old and sick Oswald- that she's fond of them, and at the same time will stick by those roses the confused and soul-searching husband Hermann sends from Canada, after being released from prison. She's casts a profile that a feminist would love to trounce, but understand where she's coming from and going all the way.
Fassbinder employs this inherent contradiction, and moments with Maria appear to go against the conventions of a melodrama (for example, Hermann walking in on the jubilant and half-naked Maria and GI is just about a masterpiece of a scene, with Maria's reaction not of surprise or guilt but pure happiness to see that he's there let alone alive), while sticking to his guns as a director of such high-minded technique with a storyline that should be predictable. But it isn't really. It's like one big metaphor for a country that, after the war, couldn't really move on to normalcy. A few times Fassbinder puts sound of the radio on in the background, and we see Maria walking around her family house, hustle and bustle going on around her, and the radio speaks of a divided Germany, of things still very unsettled, of a disarray. Maybe the only way to cope is excess, or maybe that's just my interpretation of it.
It's hard to tell, really, under Schygulla's stare face and eyes, anyway. It's such an incredible performance, really, one of those showstoppers that captures the glamor and allure of an old-time Hollywood female star while with the down-and-dirty ethic of a girl of the streets. Most telling are the opposing costumes one sees in one scene when she finally is with her husband, where she stars in one of those super-lustful black lingerie pieces and high heels, and then moves on to a dress without even thinking about it. That's almost the essence of what Maria is, and Schygulla wonderfully gets it down, a headstrong but somehow loving figure who is adored and perplexed by the men around her, sometimes in a single sentence. This is what Fassbinder captures in his wonderful first part of his "trilogy"; while I might overall prefer Veronika Voss as a masterpiece, Maria Braun is perhaps just as good as a character study, of what makes a woman tick and tock with (almost) nothing to lose.
- Quinoa1984
- Jun 20, 2009
- Permalink
- louiebotha
- Dec 19, 2007
- Permalink
Maria Braun's marriage is a very successful metaphor for post-war Germany, for the economic miracle played by Adenauer, himself heard several times in the film, in his speeches appealing to pride in German economic reconstruction.
In the rubble of the Second World War, Maria/Germany survives, between a tenuous hope of returning to the lost past and the agony of a miserable and dishonorable present.
But the defeated have no right to shame. It is up to them to rebuild the future in the bed of the victors, until they learn to live without them, more than autonomously, as new victorious powers, taking the place of those who humiliated them. In life, in the economy or even in football (Fassbinder coincides the narrative climax with the 1952 World Cup final, in which Germany became champion, for the first time in the history of the competition, thus using yet another metaphor for German reconstruction).
After the victory is complete, the honor is washed away, life ends and it is time to give way to others, to the future, which must not repeat the mistakes of the past.
A bold message and a powerful performance by Hanna Schygullla.
Fassbinder at his best.
In the rubble of the Second World War, Maria/Germany survives, between a tenuous hope of returning to the lost past and the agony of a miserable and dishonorable present.
But the defeated have no right to shame. It is up to them to rebuild the future in the bed of the victors, until they learn to live without them, more than autonomously, as new victorious powers, taking the place of those who humiliated them. In life, in the economy or even in football (Fassbinder coincides the narrative climax with the 1952 World Cup final, in which Germany became champion, for the first time in the history of the competition, thus using yet another metaphor for German reconstruction).
After the victory is complete, the honor is washed away, life ends and it is time to give way to others, to the future, which must not repeat the mistakes of the past.
A bold message and a powerful performance by Hanna Schygullla.
Fassbinder at his best.
- ricardojorgeramalho
- Aug 9, 2024
- Permalink
So one person says, "This movie is a beautiful, delicate exploration of West German life after World War II." And the other says, "Former Nazis living in bombed out buildings, and the movie is 'beautiful, delicate'?" And the first sits there nodding, takes another sip of coffee. "I can't explain. Just see it."
- JamesHitchcock
- Oct 21, 2014
- Permalink
My first Fassbinder was a wonderful experience. Film and alternative cinema (small hall, with uncomfortable seats; public had to wait while filmrolls were changed ) were perfect match.
There were many cliches used in the film, but Fassbinder presented them so cleverly that I found them really amusing. Sound was also brilliant (sometimes back being louder than dialogue).
Everything seemed to be in right place. And I loved the way how after-war-time was presented. Real fun!
There were many cliches used in the film, but Fassbinder presented them so cleverly that I found them really amusing. Sound was also brilliant (sometimes back being louder than dialogue).
Everything seemed to be in right place. And I loved the way how after-war-time was presented. Real fun!
Maria marries soldier Hermann Braun as bombs fall all around them. After the war, she is informed that he has been killed. She carries a cardboard placate searching for him. She begins an affair with a black American soldier named Bill. She gets pregnant and informs Bill. They seem happy together and then Hermann returns home.
With all the war movies, the post war movie is a rarer animal. This has an interesting take on the post war. I can say that I love Maria or her marriage. I can understand the desperation for money but she has a hunger for it. This is a complicated character and it's a difficult relationship to grab a hold on. They definitely want each other but their relationship is much more mercurial than any literary romance. I keep going back to Bill. When she realizes that Hermann is at door, she's happy to see him and she seems happy to have the two men meet. It's almost as if she wants to bring Bill into their marriage. It's hard to read her. He's a lot easier in his jealousy and his devotion. The movie leaves me with a lot of questions about Maria. In a way, she is beyond me.
With all the war movies, the post war movie is a rarer animal. This has an interesting take on the post war. I can say that I love Maria or her marriage. I can understand the desperation for money but she has a hunger for it. This is a complicated character and it's a difficult relationship to grab a hold on. They definitely want each other but their relationship is much more mercurial than any literary romance. I keep going back to Bill. When she realizes that Hermann is at door, she's happy to see him and she seems happy to have the two men meet. It's almost as if she wants to bring Bill into their marriage. It's hard to read her. He's a lot easier in his jealousy and his devotion. The movie leaves me with a lot of questions about Maria. In a way, she is beyond me.
- SnoopyStyle
- Oct 25, 2020
- Permalink
'The Marriage of Maria Braun' is German director Rainer Werner Fassbinder's best-known and most financially successful movie and it's not hard to see why: it's a big event, a tour de force. This melodrama tells the story of an audacious, beautiful woman who puts her survival instinct to use during the early post-war era, when capitalist West Germany arose from the ashes. The film begins as she's getting married amidst the chaos of the last day of World War II in 1945, and much of what follows has to do with the peculiar way in which she devotes herself to her absent, yet somehow always present, idealized husband. The character of Maria is fascinating as a person, but it also serves as an allegory for Germany during this period of reconstruction, now generally referred to as the "economic miracle" ("Wirtschaftswunder").
Hanna Shygulla gives a perfect performance as the gorgeous and strong-willed Maria. She and Fassbinder were close and had worked together in many plays and films, including 'The Bitter Tears of Eva Von Kant', in 1972. By the time they made 'The Marriage of Maria Braun' in 1979, four years had passed since their last collaboration, so they both regarded it as a special reunion. To me, the film is a testament of the director's nostalgia and adoration for his diva. He was infamously difficult with many of his actors and actresses, yet is said to have treated Shygulla with a special kind of tenderness, and I believe it shows here.
Fassbinder was openly gay, but married twice to women. His relationships with his first wife, Ingrid Caven, and Moroccan male lover El Hedi Ben Salem, both important actors in his films, are known to have been especially tempestuous. This pattern of love/hate may reflect on some of the characters in his work. He was accused (perhaps unfairly) by some feminists of being misogynistic and by some gay critics of being homophobic. I haven't watched enough of his films to have an opinion on this. But I sense there's a very particular, mixed energy projected onto the character of Maria Braun, who is both hero and antihero, someone who has an admirable tenacity to overcome adversity, yet is willing to stop at nothing in order to accomplish her goals. It's this complexity that makes the film interesting. Nothing here is easily spelled out as right or wrong.
'The Marriage of Maria Braun' is the first part of Fassbinder's BRD (Bundesrepublik Deutschland) trilogy, along with 'Veronica Voss' (1982) and 'Lola' (1981), which is made available as a set by the Criterion Collection. ('Veronica Voss' was filmed last, but is meant to be viewed as the second part of the trilogy.)
Hanna Shygulla gives a perfect performance as the gorgeous and strong-willed Maria. She and Fassbinder were close and had worked together in many plays and films, including 'The Bitter Tears of Eva Von Kant', in 1972. By the time they made 'The Marriage of Maria Braun' in 1979, four years had passed since their last collaboration, so they both regarded it as a special reunion. To me, the film is a testament of the director's nostalgia and adoration for his diva. He was infamously difficult with many of his actors and actresses, yet is said to have treated Shygulla with a special kind of tenderness, and I believe it shows here.
Fassbinder was openly gay, but married twice to women. His relationships with his first wife, Ingrid Caven, and Moroccan male lover El Hedi Ben Salem, both important actors in his films, are known to have been especially tempestuous. This pattern of love/hate may reflect on some of the characters in his work. He was accused (perhaps unfairly) by some feminists of being misogynistic and by some gay critics of being homophobic. I haven't watched enough of his films to have an opinion on this. But I sense there's a very particular, mixed energy projected onto the character of Maria Braun, who is both hero and antihero, someone who has an admirable tenacity to overcome adversity, yet is willing to stop at nothing in order to accomplish her goals. It's this complexity that makes the film interesting. Nothing here is easily spelled out as right or wrong.
'The Marriage of Maria Braun' is the first part of Fassbinder's BRD (Bundesrepublik Deutschland) trilogy, along with 'Veronica Voss' (1982) and 'Lola' (1981), which is made available as a set by the Criterion Collection. ('Veronica Voss' was filmed last, but is meant to be viewed as the second part of the trilogy.)
- birthdaynoodle
- Nov 7, 2013
- Permalink
While it's never less than interesting, Rainer Werner Fassbinder's allegory about the post-war economic German Miracle is somewhat slow and stifling, designed to constantly remind the viewer that an allegory is indeed what it is and to discount the notions of love that the writers (there are several, including Fassbinder) push to the fore. Hanna Schygulla is good as the lead symbol, a war bride whose calculated sexual aggressiveness (a symbol of West Germany's rapaciousness) brings her to prominence in industry while she pines for her husband, who is imprisoned for murder. The points Fassbinder's trying to make are a bit obtuse and perhaps not designed for American viewers (those are his prerogatives, after all) but the early scenes of the country immediately after the war are fascinating and he's aided immensely by the great Michael Ballhaus' restless camera. After prosperity begins, Fassbinder relies more on words and the visuals become more traditional and blander and it's also here where the melodrama escalates, sometimes pretentiously.
A woman uses every means possible to survive hardship in post-war West Germany. In doing so she becomes financially successful but loses her soul in the process.
The Marriage of Maria Braun is a film that operates on two different levels. On the one hand in can be seen as a look at one woman's struggle against adversity in the hardships of the post war years. While on another, the film can clearly be read as a critique of the way the new Germany forgot it's awful past and sold it's soul in order to prosper in what would become known as the German Economic Miracle. This latter reading can be determined by reading the main narrative as an allegory in which Maria Braun represents the new Germany. She begins by prostituting herself to the Americans and ends very wealthy but emotionally dead; she forgets her past quickly in order to concentrate on her future.
There is no doubt that Rainer Werner Fassbinder put together a clever allegorical film here. And there is also no doubt that Hanna Schygula is very good in the lead role. But I did have difficulty with empathising with the people in this story, as none of them were particularly likable. Perhaps that was the point of course. But, whatever the case, the film left me cold unfortunately.
The Marriage of Maria Braun is a film that operates on two different levels. On the one hand in can be seen as a look at one woman's struggle against adversity in the hardships of the post war years. While on another, the film can clearly be read as a critique of the way the new Germany forgot it's awful past and sold it's soul in order to prosper in what would become known as the German Economic Miracle. This latter reading can be determined by reading the main narrative as an allegory in which Maria Braun represents the new Germany. She begins by prostituting herself to the Americans and ends very wealthy but emotionally dead; she forgets her past quickly in order to concentrate on her future.
There is no doubt that Rainer Werner Fassbinder put together a clever allegorical film here. And there is also no doubt that Hanna Schygula is very good in the lead role. But I did have difficulty with empathising with the people in this story, as none of them were particularly likable. Perhaps that was the point of course. But, whatever the case, the film left me cold unfortunately.
- Red-Barracuda
- Jun 13, 2011
- Permalink
Alright already, get over it, was Handke's comment to the 1968 meeting of the Gruppe 48 -- those writers who wanted to "heal" from the war. Well Fassbinder doesn't want to heal, he wants to indict. And this movie, probably his most accessible, takes a woman as the symbol for the nation-- a theme common to prehistoric oral literature, particularly among the Irish, made famous by Grimmelshausen's Mother Courage and updated by Brecht's play. But in this version, instead of the tragic Mother trying to save her children and mourning them, Maria Braun sells out for comfort from collaboration with the Nazi's through the economic wonder "Wirtschaftswunder" of the cold war. This was Fassbinder's big hit, because he toned down his politics both sexual and marxist, to focus on the loss of soul that Germany experienced. It was also Hanna Schygulla's Oscar worthy performance, probably one of her best of many great ones. Like little Oskar from the Tin Drum, Maria Braun was stunted by the experience, only on the inside.
This film exhibits artful cinematic techniques wherein instead of landscape capturing the attention of the camera it is small details in how someone appears, how the woman may be wearing a cocktail hat and wrapped in a sheet. How the husband may be wearing a hat and socks and shoes and his underwear and both seem so completely at ease and comfortable. How provocative the woman is posed is another feature of the tableau that the director chooses to let us know she is a free spirit sexually and aims to get the pleasure she seeks without flirting directly or with any particular sensitivity to what the man may be feeling. The relationship between the wife and husband is unique. It is an open one wherein she holds nothing back, feels no particular shame for how she has behaved and wants to share these facts with him because her primary focus always is on the fact of their marriage. Nothing and no one can come between the two of them. Only the chances of fate can intervene---his imprisonment during the war and what follows after his return at long last. A very intriguing film which is totally absorbing.
- ravcsv54-1
- Nov 23, 2006
- Permalink
While war films are often trite and contrived, the films focusing on reconstruction efforts are always much more interesting. As is the case with "The Marriage of Maria Braun", we see the parallels between the people and the infrastructure of Germany as the exteriors are rebuilt, but the interiors remain in ruins.
- Benjamin-M-Weilert
- May 18, 2019
- Permalink
Die Ehe der Maria Braun is a fantastic film. It has layers upon layers of meaning, making it a terribly complex and difficult film to process, but not because it is poorly done. No, indeed, the complexity feels intentional and deserved. As such I do not think it is right to assign any one interpretation or message to the film, even if one believes Fassbinder to have intended one. Like a great work of art, Fassbinder asks deep political questions but does not ask these openly, instead integrating them into the characters and the themes of the film.
I am not a historian of German history or someone who has lived through it. Nor am I entirely naive or unaware of the history and context surrounding this film. I mention this to say two things. One, I think the viewing experience for someone with a deep or intimate knowledge of the period (as most people who would've originally watched it would be) would be vastly different than someone like myself. Many questions I had about who, what, and why would likely be apparent to someone with this knowledge when they weren't to me. Second, while I do think some basic knowledge of the period is necessary, I do not think the message requires one to be intimate with the period. Indeed, the beauty of good art is it transcends any one period, context, or meaning. This film is certainly good art if not great art.
I would like to go through what I think the film represents, but I think it would be more for my good than anyone else. If one is interested in thinking about the difficult questions of how a nation through the eyes of a woman--for indeed this film is about not only Maria but Germany as a whole--deals with trauma, guilt, and change, then you should watch this film yourself. You likely will not understand everything for yourself, I certainly did not, but you will not be disappointed.
I often rate a film based on how much it sticks in my mind an hour, a week, or a year after watching it. The best films are not necessarily the ones you enjoy the most, but the ones that still pop up in your mind long after you first watch them. I am yet to know for certain how long this film will stick with me, but I think it is one that I will have to come back to again one day. If that day comes, I might just have to come back here and give it a 10. Until then I think a 9 is more than deserved.
I am not a historian of German history or someone who has lived through it. Nor am I entirely naive or unaware of the history and context surrounding this film. I mention this to say two things. One, I think the viewing experience for someone with a deep or intimate knowledge of the period (as most people who would've originally watched it would be) would be vastly different than someone like myself. Many questions I had about who, what, and why would likely be apparent to someone with this knowledge when they weren't to me. Second, while I do think some basic knowledge of the period is necessary, I do not think the message requires one to be intimate with the period. Indeed, the beauty of good art is it transcends any one period, context, or meaning. This film is certainly good art if not great art.
I would like to go through what I think the film represents, but I think it would be more for my good than anyone else. If one is interested in thinking about the difficult questions of how a nation through the eyes of a woman--for indeed this film is about not only Maria but Germany as a whole--deals with trauma, guilt, and change, then you should watch this film yourself. You likely will not understand everything for yourself, I certainly did not, but you will not be disappointed.
I often rate a film based on how much it sticks in my mind an hour, a week, or a year after watching it. The best films are not necessarily the ones you enjoy the most, but the ones that still pop up in your mind long after you first watch them. I am yet to know for certain how long this film will stick with me, but I think it is one that I will have to come back to again one day. If that day comes, I might just have to come back here and give it a 10. Until then I think a 9 is more than deserved.
This first part of the BRD Trilogy has more passion and plot density than Lola, but less of the magic of Veronica Voss. The political musings have point to them: we see the shortages after the war, how the blackmarketers were able to control so much of the day-to-day life (delicious moment when Fassbinder, playing a grifter, tries to sell a complete set of Kleist to Schygulla, who remarks that burning books don't provide much warmth: she really wants firewood).
There's some clumsiness in the first hour. The scene in Maria's room with the black soldier, interrupted by Hermann's appearance should go quicker. The train scene when Maria meets Karl Oswald falls flat when she insults the GI--I cringed, it was so bad. But as the story develops and the years go by, I was drawn more and more into this glossy, cold world.
There's some clumsiness in the first hour. The scene in Maria's room with the black soldier, interrupted by Hermann's appearance should go quicker. The train scene when Maria meets Karl Oswald falls flat when she insults the GI--I cringed, it was so bad. But as the story develops and the years go by, I was drawn more and more into this glossy, cold world.
Sporadically this does demonstrate masterful dialog and especially finely crafted direction from the distinguished German filmmaker, but summing it's entirety as a masterpiece feels way overpraised. There seems to be almost as much dead weight being carried around in The Marriage of Maria Braun as there is subtle grace.
Thankfully to aid Fassbinder's articulate work is lead (and apparent muse) Hanna Schygulla. Her transformation, however underhanded in pace, is entertaining to behold and probably one of the stronger female performances of the time. She exudes a sensuality better suited for long pauses then line recitals, but overall does an admirable job through and through.
Purists may revel in it's technical pronunciations and metaphoric finesse, but a certain emotional detachment lingers the entire time- contrary to what the script would imply. Don't let the typical European surprise shock ending and over-theorized allegorical conjecture fool you into calling this a masterpiece, it is still just a reasonably well made journey into the female psyche of post-war Germany.
Thankfully to aid Fassbinder's articulate work is lead (and apparent muse) Hanna Schygulla. Her transformation, however underhanded in pace, is entertaining to behold and probably one of the stronger female performances of the time. She exudes a sensuality better suited for long pauses then line recitals, but overall does an admirable job through and through.
Purists may revel in it's technical pronunciations and metaphoric finesse, but a certain emotional detachment lingers the entire time- contrary to what the script would imply. Don't let the typical European surprise shock ending and over-theorized allegorical conjecture fool you into calling this a masterpiece, it is still just a reasonably well made journey into the female psyche of post-war Germany.
- oneloveall
- Jan 31, 2008
- Permalink
Over the past few months, Rainer Werner Fassbinder ("Fox and His Friends") has been a director that I've really gravitated towards. Though his films are often quiet dramas about the everyday occurrences happening in the lives of everyday people living in West Germany, I've found that Fassbinder has a way of bringing forth truths about human nature and behavior that other people would rather leave unacknowledged. Every character in this movie, from the ones whom only have a few minutes of screen time to our protagonist Maria Braun (Hanna Schygulla, "The Merchant of Four Seasons"), is dynamic and complex; they feel as real and tactile as if they were standing before me in the flesh. They have moody moments; moments of shining tenderness and bitter hopelessness; moments where they're forced to compromise their morals and moments when they stand their ground.
Though I will admit the first thirty or so minutes of this film are rather predictable, after that, it's impossible to tell where Maria's life is headed. Her journey is one that paints a sad portrait of Germany immediately after the fall of the Third Reich (a world in which Fassbinder himself grew up). The world as they know it feels akin to purgatory; Germany is no longer in the hellish grips of war, but it is far from feeling heavenly.
I still have yet to see a Fassbinder film I've disliked. This film had all of his usual brilliant character observations, wonderfully complex writing, and darkly humorous moments, but it also provided an eye-opening commentary on a world and people lost to the sands of time. Fassbinder knows how to craft a world that feels balanced: there are scenes of sadness and happiness; scenes of tenderness and also those of coldness; but never once does any of the drama in this movie feel stretched or unrealistic. Fassbinder was truly a cinematic treasure, and if you've yet to check out any of his work, this is as a good place to start as any.
Though I will admit the first thirty or so minutes of this film are rather predictable, after that, it's impossible to tell where Maria's life is headed. Her journey is one that paints a sad portrait of Germany immediately after the fall of the Third Reich (a world in which Fassbinder himself grew up). The world as they know it feels akin to purgatory; Germany is no longer in the hellish grips of war, but it is far from feeling heavenly.
I still have yet to see a Fassbinder film I've disliked. This film had all of his usual brilliant character observations, wonderfully complex writing, and darkly humorous moments, but it also provided an eye-opening commentary on a world and people lost to the sands of time. Fassbinder knows how to craft a world that feels balanced: there are scenes of sadness and happiness; scenes of tenderness and also those of coldness; but never once does any of the drama in this movie feel stretched or unrealistic. Fassbinder was truly a cinematic treasure, and if you've yet to check out any of his work, this is as a good place to start as any.
- truemythmedia
- Nov 10, 2019
- Permalink
- steiner-sam
- Jun 1, 2021
- Permalink
- joachimokeefe
- May 29, 2020
- Permalink
- jboothmillard
- Jul 9, 2012
- Permalink
This 1978 Fassbinder movie starts with the film's eponymous hero Maria getting married to her husband Hermann in Germany during World War II just as a bomb being dropped threatens to curtail proceedings. Thankfully the couple's union is officially sealed and Hermann then goes off to fight in the war himself.
After learning later that her new husband has been tragically killed Maria starts to go to a local bar frequented by American soldiers to work as a waitress. She meets a black US soldier called Bill who she then starts a relationship with. They are just getting it on one day when...to tell you anymore would be to reveal a huge plot detail that I'm not going to spoil for you!
I first heard about this film when at university studying Film Studies as one of my tutors had the poster for the movie on her office wall.
Whilst it's interesting to see a character doing what needs to be done to survive and indeed prosper within challenging circumstances, I found this film to be a bit, erm, flat. I've read great reviews regarding it with many critics and casual viewers stating the opinion that this is one of Fassbinder's best movies. When it was originally released it not only wowed the critics but also performed very well at the box office. But I think that this is maybe because many of the more radical and idiosyncratic aspects of Fassbinder's films aren't present here hence making it more palatable for cinemagoers used to more mainstream and linear films.
I think that if you have a lead character who can become so detached and cold as to exploit those around her for her own gain even if it's done in exceptionally destitute circumstances, you don't have an especially likeable character who audiences can engage with. At least that's what I felt. Plenty of critics and moviegoing audiences disagree though.
Not a complete disaster by any stretch of the imagination with great acting and fantastic cinematography as ever by Michael Ballhaus who would go on to work with Scorsese after his tenure with Fassbinder was over.
After learning later that her new husband has been tragically killed Maria starts to go to a local bar frequented by American soldiers to work as a waitress. She meets a black US soldier called Bill who she then starts a relationship with. They are just getting it on one day when...to tell you anymore would be to reveal a huge plot detail that I'm not going to spoil for you!
I first heard about this film when at university studying Film Studies as one of my tutors had the poster for the movie on her office wall.
Whilst it's interesting to see a character doing what needs to be done to survive and indeed prosper within challenging circumstances, I found this film to be a bit, erm, flat. I've read great reviews regarding it with many critics and casual viewers stating the opinion that this is one of Fassbinder's best movies. When it was originally released it not only wowed the critics but also performed very well at the box office. But I think that this is maybe because many of the more radical and idiosyncratic aspects of Fassbinder's films aren't present here hence making it more palatable for cinemagoers used to more mainstream and linear films.
I think that if you have a lead character who can become so detached and cold as to exploit those around her for her own gain even if it's done in exceptionally destitute circumstances, you don't have an especially likeable character who audiences can engage with. At least that's what I felt. Plenty of critics and moviegoing audiences disagree though.
Not a complete disaster by any stretch of the imagination with great acting and fantastic cinematography as ever by Michael Ballhaus who would go on to work with Scorsese after his tenure with Fassbinder was over.
- meathookcinema
- Nov 19, 2020
- Permalink