First off, to anyone who wants to see this piece, just go to YouTube! There's even a version with a new electric-guitar rock soundtrack (that I personally found highly inappropriate). The more recent treatment using part of Ravel's String Quartet is far more successful, and I think a decided improvement. The original dark and dreamy piano and strings that properly accompany the film complement it well, though I found myself wishing for something a bit more cheerful partway through; this is exactly the sort of music that in a traditional dramatic narrative would signal misfortune and sorrow. Despite its beauty and the marvel of the painstakingly-achieved pinscreen animation, I wouldn't recommend this film for anyone suffering from depression or dementia-- overall it could seem too gloomy and ominous.
Some have likened it to an acid trip, which isn't off-base, though it would ultimately be of the uncomfortable type, weird without being cosmic, with none of that joyous LSD rainbow-circus "eat flowers and kiss babies" feel. Don't get me wrong; there's much beauty here, but chiefly in the first part where the shapes of nature do a slow dance of transformation. It's when a house appears that things really begin to get complicated.
At first we get a limited impression of what the artist is thinking or feeling during his experience. He's painted a nice landscape, and standing back to admire it sees that it's aligned perfectly to blend in with the scene behind; then the picture comes alive with the movement of birds and clouds in the breeze, and he gets the idea to climb through the canvas. As soon as he does so, however, the pleasant landscape starts to alter strangely, and he turns back, only to see the 'doorway' vanish. Uh-oh, he's stuck! The music turns positively sinister for a moment. After this he's mostly a passive observer, someone having a vision rather than participating in an actual adventure.
He does finally start looking alarmed towards the end; the house that beckons with opening doors shows what's at first a box of toys; watch as it changes and you'll see the teddy bear snarl with bared fangs for an instant before it vanishes into another shape and finally the whole bursts into flames, setting the house on fire... Well, I've already described too much. What exactly is creator Jacques Drouin trying to say? That one's own mind is a scary place and best not explored? Considering the effort required to achieve so much pinscreen animation, surely the message must be important.
Perhaps this would be utter desecration of the filmmaker's vision, but I have to wonder what could be made of 'Mindscape/Le Paysagiste' by colorizing (yes!) and having lighter music, perhaps harp and flute. Some of the imagery can be rather disturbing, and hardly needs to be made more so by the soundtrack. I suppose that what I'm basically suggesting is making the film easier to enjoy, and it was plainly not intended as simply something for enjoyment... but surely one would have plenty to ponder even with a less oppressive version. As it is, the film is very much worth seeing, but for some of us probably not over and over. Still, applause is due to M. Drouin for his achievement!
1 out of 1 found this helpful.
Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink