The Little Girl Who Lives Down the Lane (1976) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
157 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Atmospheric thriller...
MarieGabrielle8 September 2006
This film was made in 1976, when thriller/suspense still had to have some semblance of a plot; innuendo rather than special effects; decent acting rather than explosions and violence.

And for that it is to be appreciated. Jodi Foster is very good as Rynn, a mysterious 13 year old who lives alone in a seaside town, somewhere off the coast of Massachusetts. Martin Sheen, as always, is excellent as a neighborhood creep, interested in Rynn, (he has some sort of criminal history against children).

Scott Jacoby is her peer, trying to help her live alone, and stay in the house her father has provided, although her father and mother have both mysteriously disappeared.

All in all an interesting theme, with some beautiful landscapes of the New England, and the beaches during winter. 8/10.
50 out of 57 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Intriguing, macabre and brilliantly acted - a must see film!
The_Void13 December 2005
Wow, where has this little flick been? The Little Girl who Lives Down the Lane is an intriguing mystery, an intense character portrait and a dark, brooding thriller all rolled into one rather odd little package - and on a personal note, I liked it a lot! The film has gained some notoriety (although not as much as it would have if it was more seen) for the scene involving a thirteen year old Jodie Foster undressing - but that never offsets the point of the film, and besides that; it's hardly like the scene has just been thrown in to satisfy the perverts in the audience. Furthermore, the most shocking scene in the film involves a hamster with no naked teenage girl present! Anyway, The Little Girl Who Lives Down the Lane is about a young girl, living down a quiet lane with her poet father. Only nobody has ever this man, and it isn't long before nosey neighbours - such as the perverted Frank Hallet and his enquiring, power mad mother comes sniffing round, eager to upset her life. She's not quick to let them know the truth, however, and along with her boyfriend; a crippled young magician from the neighbourhood, she is forced to take steps to preserve her independence.

The most obvious theme running through the film stems from loneliness, and how being brought up on your own will ultimately leave you a different person to if things such as schools are allowed to take charge. This is interesting; as it preaches the idea of social conditioning makes up the person more than most like to admit. The film is often touted as being a horror, but this is incorrect. While the film does feature several macabre instances, and a foreboding and mysterious atmosphere that is present throughout the run time; there's very little in the way of actual horror. The Little Girl Who Lives Down the Lane is much more of a drama-come-mystery than a horror film. The film is probably most notable for it's lead performance. Jodie Foster had already impressed in 1976 with her role in Martin Scorsese's hit film, Taxi Driver - but here she is far better. Despite her young age, Foster commands the screen and despite being a child, her maturity and acting talent shine through to make this a more complete performance than most actresses manage in a lifetime.

On the whole, this film was once hard to come by; but with the new DVD currently doing the rounds, the film should be seen by everyone. The Little Girl Who Lives Down the Lane fits snugly alongside the rest of the classics of the seventies, and the fact that it has only just resurfaced is one of cinema's biggest injustices. Highly recommended viewing!
64 out of 77 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Exceptionally original but very, very disturbing
planktonrules1 June 2007
Warning: Spoilers
In many ways this is a very unpleasant and highly disturbing film, but it is also extremely original and very watchable. Jody Foster plays a 13 year-old who lives on her own but manages to successfully pretend that she lives with her father. Again and again, when adults visit, she manages to convince most of them that he's alive and well though it's painfully obvious to the viewer that she's alone. Now this certainly is not enough to make a movie, so there are some very creepy subplots involving a horribly nosy and cruel real estate agent (Alexis Smith) and her pedophile son (Martin Sheen in a very difficult role). Both are such awful people that you really feel sorry for Foster and most will probably root for her to kill them! In particular, Sheen is super-sickening to watch, as he knows something is amiss and surmises that Foster is all alone--making her the perfect sexual abuse victim. His groping her and killing her pet hamster before her eyes (in a very realistic scene) will no doubt cause many viewers to turn off the film because it is so intense and disturbing. While these didn't bother me too much, a nude scene late in the movie did, as it appeared as if young Foster was naked. The idea of a 13 year-old naked on screen is very disconcerting, though according to IMDb the scene was actually done by Foster's older sister (whew). Regardless, showing so much skin really wasn't necessary and just seemed exploitational--making this the only negative in the film. Aside from that, the movie was surprisingly exciting and managed to make a simple story idea compelling and credible.
35 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
DARJEELING OR EARL GREY???
jonpd5 December 2002
Unique suspense film made in Canada in the mid-1970s. It's a shame that no one has ever really noticed this little film. Well, TBS sure did and I first watched it on there in 1987 or 1988. Since, I have found it in a couple of video stores and eventually taped it off of TBS in 1990 or 1991. Nonetheless, it is a truly wonderful thriller featuring a spectacular performance from a young, gifted Foster. Sheen and Smith are quite nasty as her enemies, and Shuman and Jacoby are good as her friends. Altogether, a remarkable suspense film that has not received the praise it deserves.
94 out of 105 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
This ain't no horror
kazjin_26 April 2020
Went into this film expecting a horror flick, for that is one of its genres according to IMDb. "Horror" does not fit this movie. "Creepy", perhaps?

Anyway, wrong expectations can lead to disappointments. Luckily, this film was not. Solid picture with strong performances from Jodie Foster and Martin Sheen.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Interesting Little Thriller.
drownsoda9028 December 2006
"The Little Girl Who Lives Down The Lane" focuses on Rynn Jacobs (played by the brilliant Jodie Foster), a thirteen year old girl who lives in an old house a little outside of a small seaside town. The neighbors and townspeople are nosy, and always end up checking in on Rynn to find her all by herself, a very independent little girl. But where is her father? That is the question that everyone who visits the home has. Rynn has temporary excuses to her father's whereabouts, but soon Rynn has to resort to extremes - even murder - to hide a secret from the nosy people and the landlord who are invading her home and wanting to know too much information.

More of a drama thriller than a horror movie (as the film may seem), "The Little Girl Who Lives Down The Lane" is an interesting psychological thriller that is held very well with Jodie Foster's excellent performance (as always). She shows off her acting abilities in everything I've seen her in, and even in this, which is her earlier work, she still shows a high amount of potential. It's no wonder she's become such a celebrated Hollywood actress, she's good at what she does. Martin Sheen, also playing a nosy neighbor in this film, is also very good in his role. I liked the idea of this film - an isolated and lonely little girl who seems to be possibly living alone, but hiding a secret as to why her father has mysteriously disappeared. But where is her father, and why isn't he there? The premise is intriguing so I thoroughly enjoyed the film. And the idea of such a young child resorting to murder is plain disturbing, even though it has been done a number of times, it's done very well here.

But the real strong point of this film is what happens in the audience's point of view. We, just like the landlord and her son, and all of the other nosy people that are invading her home, don't know the secret behind why Rynn's father is gone either. The audience is put in the position of these characters, and it's a really fun experience to try and figure it out for ourselves.

Overall, "The Little Girl Who Lives Down The Lane" is a sometimes eerie and interesting thriller. It keeps the audience guessing along with it but holds onto our interest the entire time and doesn't fail with the storyline. Very well executed and very well acted, with a strong atmosphere to go along with it. Don't expect a gory slasher film though, because this is nothing even close to that. 7/10.
23 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Oddball psychological thriller hits the mark
Leofwine_draca7 April 2018
Warning: Spoilers
The 1970s is a decade chock-full of interesting and long-forgotten American and Canadian movies, many of them made for television, some not. THE LITTLE GIRL WHO LIVES DOWN THE LANE is such a film, an astonishing tour-de-force for a youthful Jodie Foster, cementing her shocking role in TAXI DRIVER. She plays a weird and friendless 13-year-old who lives alone in a house; there's some mystery surrounding the fate of her parents which comes to light as the story goes on. This is set in a single room for the most part and feels like it was adapted from a play, although it's actually taken from a novel. It's a psychological thriller which remains thoroughly interesting thanks to strong writing and interesting, unique characters. Martin Sheen plays a completely sleazy character and there are a few shocking moments here and there, but for the most part this is slow-paced and almost surreal at times. It's certainly a film that leaves an impression and is ripe for re-discovery by modern viewers.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Eerie, provocative thriller...
moonspinner556 September 2005
New to a seaside village, a young girl and her poet father seem to live an isolated existence, until curious neighbors get nosy and always seem to find the fiercely independent girl on her own... Unwisely advertised as a horror movie, "Little Girl" is instead an amazing psychological thriller, rich with atmosphere and featuring a lead performance by Jodie Foster that is deft and incredibly assured. The sequence where Foster, troubled by the sickness of a friend, eats alone at a hamburger counter (actually, she hasn't touched her food), then wanders down the street studded with marquee lights has to be one of the most beautiful Foster moments put on film. Well-directed and written, the movie is very cognizant of the way adults condescend to or ignore children, and allows leading character Rynn to use her intelligence as a tool--and maybe a weapon as well. Those looking for slasher-type jolts may be disappointed with the picture; it's more subtle than something like "Halloween", creating suspense out of tension and mood instead of outré violence. Foster was at a personal peak at this time in the movies, having just completed "Taxi Driver" and "Bugsy Malone". This isn't the harrowing character study of "Taxi Driver", but it is a remarkable portrait of a terribly uncommon child dealing with very grown-up issues. Due out on DVD in October 2005.
115 out of 131 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Decent thriller
saraccan17 November 2021
I would have to say that the young Jodie Foster's rebellious child and Martin Sheen's mega creepy pedophile acting performances outshines everything else in this movie. If you took them out, you wouldn't have a worthy movie. It has some pacing problems i think which made the movie feel longer than it actually is. But its an overall enjoyable thriller.

A girl living alone in a big house facing problems created by the adults living in that town.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Not Your Typical Story Line! What a Terrific Off-Beat Thriller.
Scot618 July 2000
Great Suspense and Atmosphere. This movie instantly became one of my all-time favorites and is difficult to describe without giving too much away. More than most movies I can remember, reading too many comments about it's content beforehand can detract from the viewing experience (and a great one at that!) and ruin the suspense. I will try not to give too much about the film away beforehand.

First of all, I loved the production quality, atmosphere and locale. It would be a great movie to see on Halloween night for example, at least in my opinion. It really can be watched anytime however and will be just as great. The acting was high quality, all the way around but especially with Jodie Foster and Martin Sheen and the direction and score are excellent as well.

I had a problem with the plausibility of Jodie Foster's character behaving essentially as an adult. It was a little tough for me to buy into a 13 (or newly turned 14 year old) cooking gourmet meals, serving fine wines, listening to Chopin and generally acting much older than her chronological age.

Even taking into consideration the events in her life which apparently had shaped her personality, she seemed too mature for her age. If you put that concern aside however and accept it as a given premise of the movie you can sit back and enjoy the fun of trying to figure out what's going on.

And trying to figure out what's going on really *is* fun in this movie. Figuring out what's going on with her mysterious father is enough to keep you occupied in itself (if you think you've figured out what's going on with him you will find later that you probably haven't) and that's only one aspect of this complex scenario.

I hate when movies this good are not in general circulation any longer. Brian de Palma's "Sisters" and many other excellent movies also fall into this category. I can't figure out why studios can't figure out ways to continue to make them available to the public, after all...they went to the trouble to make them in the first place.

If you do get a chance to see "Little Girl Who Lives Down the Lane" however, jump at it. You aren't likely to be disappointed.
91 out of 104 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Disturbing movie
nixy-caos14 October 2022
I could rate this movie a 9 or a 4, or something in between. It's very, very difficult to decide. What a strange movie! From the first to the last minute There is always a dark, bizarre, disturbing air. The plot is strange, but it grips you. The performances are spectacular. Jodie Foster and Martin Sheen are Amazing, really. But it's definitely not the kind of movie I would recommend to anyone, so I leave the warning that, in order to enjoy the movie, you have to be open-minded to something strange and disturbing. I repeat: it could be evaluated with a 4 or a 9, depending on the mood of the viewer.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
This little girl can look after herself just fine, thank you.
lost-in-limbo24 June 2006
Rynn Jacobs is a lonely, but well equipped 13-year old girl who lives with her poet father, while keeping a dark secret in the cellar. Although whenever somebody dropped by she would tell him or her that her father was too busy to greet his or her guests, or that he was out of town. But her life in solitaire is interrupted when she gets a visit from her snoopy landlady and her perverted son who takes a real shinning to Rynn. This is when Rynn goes to any lengths to keep this lifestyle with the help from a local crippled boy Mario, to herself.

This noteworthy gem of small-scale, mystery-thriller incorporates a fascinating slow-drifting character study that has certain believability in its characterizations and manipulative suspense. The macabrely, lurid context of the film could have over-step the mark, but it keeps it mostly under-wrapped with it being more hinted, than aiming for anything really illustrative. But that in mind, it doesn't lose any of that unnerving effect that's spun out, because the confronting performances and crafty dialogues are extremely effective in underlining the disquieting horror that lurks within the film's make-up. What sweeps you along is that the script is lyrically dense and quite thoughtful, while it still generates psychological tension in certain scenes without needing to go out with a bang. There's nothing big or powerful about it, because it plays it cards close to its chest and grafts away with it's involving story and sedated handling. The compelling plot is incredibly well defined by touching on many different aspects that Foster's character encounters. These range from loneliness to her approach on life through an adult perspective and finally that of her estrange relationships with some of the town's folk. It's all about her finding her feet and living her life the way she wants to without the intrusion of others (the adults) enforcing their resolutions onto her because she's "just" a child. Life is what you make it and she's not going to play their game. It's just really hard to categorise this unique film (which, was originally intended to be a TV movie), because it goes down oh so many paths, but it's successful in gelling them together.

Jodie Foster in the lead role makes the character her own by providing a maturely astute performance as the independent girl Rynn Jacobs. Her professionalism really does take hold in this picture and she does so with great control. Martin Sheen is equally as good and believable by playing his villainous character in a very subtle way, but still able to bring a creepy and vile presence to this predator Frank. Scott Jacoby is likable as Mario; Alexis Smith is great as the intrusively stern landlady Mrs. Hallet and Mort Shuman as the caring local officer gives a moving performance. What makes these performances so great is that they have vivid characters to feed off and shape.

Since it was intended to be a TV movie it does feel and look like one, but none of that took away from the elegant looking production. You could tell it was low-key because most of the film did take place in or around Rynn's isolated house. The direction by Nicolas Gessner is carefully crafted and from the outset he paints a mysteriously brooding atmosphere. The simple layout of photography is crisp and beautifully demonstrated. While, the stirring score is quite a strange one with it's heavy handed approach, but it has some sort of a hypnotic trance because it likes to play around with the moody and quite edgy situations.

This under-appreciated find of the 70's is a surprisingly focused and innovative treat that grips you from the very opening.
84 out of 97 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Is Jodie Foster an Adult Trapped in a Kid's Body?
gavin694219 July 2012
The first thing that strikes me about this is how adult Jodie Foster's character is. At only 13, she talks like an adult and handles adult situations. Granted, on some occasions she is awkward and does not always think consequences through. But, hey, neither do some adults. One could argue that Foster had adult characteristics in "Taxi Driver", too. Did she reach adulthood at 12?

Anyway, not a bad movie. Some have called it horror, and I am not sure if it really fits in with that genre. I can see it -- death, a stalker trying to get in the house, a girl who has little contact with the outside world... but does it ever fully cross from drama to horror? Hard to say.

Martin Sheen also appears as the pedophile who seems all too comfortable walking into houses without being invited. Judging his acting is difficult. I mean, he did a really great job convincing me that he was a child rapist. But it is hard to really congratulate someone for that... nice work being a creeper.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
If you thought Foster's role in Taxi Driver was disturbing....
alistair_deacon-130 October 2005
Warning: Spoilers
If you thought Foster's role in Taxi Driver was disturbing, you ain't seen nothing yet...

I don't know how to rate this movie, but it made me feel dirty. It is an interesting thriller where Jodie Foster plays a 13 year old girl who lives by herself in a cottage in a quiet little town and hides some dark secrets that you discover as the film progresses. Most of the "thrill" factor of the film comes from Martin Sheen's character who is the local pedophile (everyone in town knows about his 'predilections') and is trying quite transparently and disturbingly to prey on Foster's character. Along the way, Foster's 13 year old character ends up having a love affair with a boy from the local high school who is a crippled amateur magician (no kidding).

Foster is an incredible actress, everyone in the film does a good job, and this film has plenty to recommend it. However, the pedophile theme is disturbing and sometimes crosses into exploitation. What is particularly bothersome to me is that after we have this whole Martin Sheen the detestable pedophile theme played throughout the movie we are then shown a tender love making scene between Foster and her crippled magician boyfriend, including nudity as they disrobe (I don't really want to see sex scenes with 13 year old girls, and I especially don't want to see sex scenes with naked 13 year old girls, OK?!? I felt like I needed to go take a shower after watching this.), forcing us to view Foster's 13 year old character in a sexual light. As far as I'm concerned, that is exploitative and really is intended to play for kicks to a pedophile element in the audience. The easiest way to express the message of this movie would be: "Little girls -- so innocent, and yet so sexy." It's f--ed up if you ask me.

There is some satisfaction, however, in the fact that Martin Sheen's character gets his just desserts in the end. The film is well made, the acting is superb, and it is certainly something from out of left field, so to speak. Were it not for the weird themes and situations, however, this film would be little more than a collection of genre clichés.

The Little Girl Who Lives Down The Lane reminds me of The Blue Lagoon (Brooke Shields) in that it is a well made, beautiful, thought provoking film, and yet I really wouldn't allow my children to be around the people who made it. However, The Blue Lagoon has much more to recommend it than The Little Girl Who Lives Down The Lane. I would only recommend this film to genuine Foster connoisseurs or to people who are really looking for some strange and unique cinema to see, because this certainly is strange and unique. ...How this movie was ever rated 'PG' is beyond the scope of my considerable imagination. Recommended only for well-adjusted adults.
30 out of 72 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Captivating mystery with solid performances
Poseidon-312 September 2006
Warning: Spoilers
It's sometimes overlooked, in light of Foster's two Best Actress Oscars for a pair of her adult performances, how remarkable her career as a child actress was. She was not only a busy performer but also a versatile one, swinging from TV sitcoms to dramas with ease. In 1976 alone, she appeared in the films "Echoes of Summer", "Taxi Driver", Bugsy Malone", "Freaky Friday" and "The Little Girl Who Lives Down the Lane" and these were not small or undemanding parts! Here she plays the title character, a young teen residing in a large, leased home ostensibly under the care of her poet father. Soon, the question is raised as to whether her father is actually living there with her and, if he's not, what has become of him? A small assortment of local people come and go, each providing either reassurance or threat as her existence is examined. Sheen is a pathological jerk who has a thing for underage girls. He barges in uninvited and threatens her in a very tough and audacious manner. Smith plays his mother and the leasing agent for the house. She's every bit as imperious as her son, though she's clearly mortified by him and appalled by his behavior while retaining a mother's protectiveness of him. Jacoby is a mildly-disabled teen who befriends Foster in her hour of need, becoming a very important presence in her life. Shuman plays Jacoby's uncle, a friendly, undemanding policeman. As Foster ekes out her seemingly lonely life, she finds out that some people won't allow her that luxury while others make it clear to her that she'd rather enjoy the company of someone. At once a character study, a mystery and a thriller, this film has a few minor flaws, but remains captivating. Foster, outfitted in an unfortunately obvious wig, does an admirable job playing a girl about her own age in extraordinary circumstances. Foster, herself, seems as advanced as the impossibly adult-like character she's portraying. It's an eye-opening characterization and she handles it well. (There is one bizarro moment when her much older sister stands in for her in an unnecessary nude scene, displaying bikini tan lines that couldn't be remotely possible in the crisp, snowy setting of the film!) Sheen is just about as slimy as they come, conveying the idea that it's his right to come into a person's home and molest his daughter! Jacoby gives a strong performance, his quirky, tender persona providing a nice counterpoint to Foster's austerity. Shuman is very natural and believable in his part as well. One highlight of the film is the extraordinary turn by Smith. In her two brief scenes, she manages to inject a massive amount of subtext and a panorama of attitudes into her character. Looking terrific in a pair of Valentino-designed New England matron ensembles, she wrings every possible drop of interest and texture out of her role. Her scant screen time is a lesson in how to get the most out of every moment. It's an intriguing set-up and an enthralling film most of the time. There's a lack of plausibility at times and it's also startlingly obvious at others, but most viewers will find themselves hanging on to see how it ends. The fairly vague finale may not fully satisfy everyone, though.
35 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I didn't know how much I wanted this.
GiraffeDoor16 October 2021
I'm not quite sure what to say about this restrained little picture but I know I want to say something.

It commands a subtle power from the very beginning; that something sinister is lurking beneath the surface but I have literally no clue what.

At its core it's really a character piece. For me, Foster has always been one of those people that gets admired by other people. But there is something at once perturbing and yet irresistible about this pubescent adult interacting with people around her. Some are threats, some are well-intentionally condescending and I like to think that on some level we basically have a love story that one can actually take seriously.

With a certain mystery to hold it together, the way the plot goes might not be what anyone would call masterful story telling and the whole thing feels a lot more like memoirs and disjointed episodes than a solid narrative.

But there's so much personality in this quite singular experience and it's a rare and refreshing advocation for the emancipation of children.

There's also a pair of jeans that look pretty good on the floor.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Get out of my house!
dbdumonteil20 May 2005
Nicolas Gessner is very special director:an Hungarian,he made most of his career in France where he is today virtually forgotten,although his sentimental series "le château des oliviers" was a smash some fifteen years ago.

After directing Mireille Darc in "la blonde de Pekin" which is pleasant but not very absorbing,he made his two best works in the seventies:"quelqu'un derrière la porte "(1971) and "little girl...." These works have many similarities:both feature American stars ,Bronson and Perkins in the former,Foster and Sheen in the latter;both sometimes look like filmed stage production,although "little girl" was not,unlike "quelqu'un ...' a play;and murders;and a mysterious character in both :Foster's and Bronson's ones.

I would favor "little girl" over "quelqu'un" though.Part of the reason can be found in the fact that Foster was already a whizz kid and she carries the whole movie on her shoulders ,and it's not a small feat to make us forget the numerous plot holes.To think that at 15,she was already able to dub herself in French -like co-star Mort Shuman,who was enjoying a very successful career in France after writing for Elvis,Spector and many more-.Sheen is also impressive as a disturbing pedophile.In "quelqu'un..",Bronson was miscast and Perkins just gambled on his "psycho " prestige.

A distant relative of Jack Clayton's "our mother's house" (1967),but not as haunting though.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Fascinating and very disturbing
stevelivesey-3718331 May 2023
Josie Foster is immense in the titular role showing the kind of form that would go on to net her two Oscar's in later life.

Is has to be said that from the outset, this is a profoundly disturbing film. This is mainly because of Martin Sheen who is beyond creepy as the, to put it politely, antagonist.

This must have been shocking when it came out in the seventies because watching it now, fifty years later, is quite jarring.

It's not perfect by a long way. It feels like a play adapted for the screen as the film is set largely in the main room in Fosters house. The editing is par for the course for the 70's, poor. But I can forgive a lot with the way that the film crashes toward its conclusion.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
how could i have missed this one?
lucio@rocketmail.com10 October 2005
Even though I have heard and read about this movie for over 20 years, I never actually saw it until the newly released widescreen DVD. THE LITTLE GIRL WHO LIVES DOWN THE LANE is one of the best written and well acted films I have ever seen!! Although you will most likely find this title in the "horror" section at your video store, it is a solid mystery / suspense story. I have to say I was so impressed with the intelligent screenplay that I never lost interest even for a minute. The fact that the film is rated PG should not let that sway you either. There are some dark, chilling moments and innuendo that would probably gain the film an R rating today. By the way this DVD is the European cut which has a few moments absent from most U.S. prints! Also the soundtrack contains some funky heavy bass driven music that totally reminded me of Goblin! One of my greatest pleasures in life is to discover or re-discover old movies through the magic of DVD. Thank you MGM for making this title available!
67 out of 79 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
On the nose, but enjoyable.
hairlikebroc27 November 2020
There is little below the surface of this film. It presents an intriguing premace and sticks with it rather predictably. Nonetheless, it is quite enjoyable to follow this compelling story.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A genuine original
Ali_John_Catterall12 November 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Jodie Foster doesn't like this film. "When people are there to simply do a job they don't have any passion for," she is reported as saying, "those are nearly always bad films." Presumably, her unhappy memories of the shoot (she refused to do a nude scene; she was 14 at the time) prejudiced her against the movie. This is a shame, because The Little Girl Who Lives Down The Lane, based on the novella by Laird Koenig, in no way disgraces a fascinating CV. Fortunately or otherwise, we are merely spectators to the end result - a flawed, genuine oddity, with a lot going for it.

A post Taxi Driver Foster plays 13 year-old Rynn Jacobs, the eponymous, wildly precocious 'Girl' living alone in a rented house by the New England coast, surviving on travellers cheques and misdirection. We gradually discover that her celebrated poet father has died, though this fact must remain a secret, lest she be taken into care.

We also learn that she is disliked by her horrid landlady (Smith) and the feeling is mutual ("This is my house," she whispers defiantly at Mrs Hallet's retreating back), although her bad wolf of a son Frank (Sheen) would certainly like to see more of Rynn.

There is a secret under the trap door in the living room. Soon there will be two secrets. And there are two innocents, a kindly local policeman (Shuman) and his teenage nephew, the polio-crippled amateur conjurer Mario (Jacoby), who are drawn into her desperately self-contained world. The certain tragedy is that, like some barbed exotic insect with an impenetrable defence mechanism, Rynn seems destined for a life of eternal, wintry desolation.

Though originally promoted as a horror by perplexed distributors (tagline: "Ask Her No Questions And Nobody Dies!") the film defies pat categorizing - at various junctures resembling a stagey, Hitchcockian suspense thriller in the Rope vein, an existential drama, even at times a romantic comedy, albeit a distinctly unsentimental one.

Its closest cinematic neighbours are The Cement Garden and Hard Candy, although there is practically no bloodletting and, whether through design or fluffed direction, few sudden shocks. It might also be read as an allegory of anti-Semitism, with the Jewish, Hebrew-studying Rynn fiercely protecting her culture and lifestyle from the local, close-ranked WASPs: "Thirteen and brilliant, as so many of your people are," sneers Mrs Hallet; 'brilliant', the equivalent of the Oriental-directed 'inscrutable'.

Mostly, as suggested by the title, with its echoes of the playroom, The Little Girl is steeped in the dark, tangled stuff of folk and fairytale; the domain of evil witch queens who must be vanquished; of ogres who threaten pubescent, tower-bound princesses; and of heroic young wizards who come to their rescue. Archetypes that grow up alongside us, becoming wilder, more dangerous and more unpredictable as we reach our teens.

"How old do you have to be before people start treating you like a person?" complains Rynn, no longer an infant, but still possessed of the vulnerability of adolescence; it is touchingly, appallingly sad that Rynn believes she might be able to deflect Sheen's advances by telling him she is a year older than she actually is; 14 not 13. If the courageous Mario has sworn to uphold her honour with his dazzling sleight of hand, all his tricks are rendered powerless in the face of this thirtysomething predator ("Be a good little magician would you son, and disappear yourself") who even drops by on Hallowe'en; two years before Michael Myers.

It is up to Rynn, drawing on all her resources, to defeat the monster with her magic potion by the end of the story. All performances here are exemplary, from Foster's wise-beyond-her-years title role to Sheen's bullying child molester, a brave and potentially career-burying role coming so soon after Badlands.

There's great support too from Smith, Jacoby and 'Viva Las Vegas' songwriter Shuman, also responsible for the lovely main theme - though hopefully not the dreadful incidental wah-wah, familiar from 1970s cop thrillers.

Such incongruous intrusions, along with some flat, TV-movie direction and the queasy sight of Foster (or rather her body-doubling elder sister Connie) jumping naked into bed with Mario, don't do the film any favours; between this, Taxi Driver and Bugsy Malone, poor Jodie had by 1976 become as prematurely sexualised as a Bratz doll. And for a movie dealing with paedophiles, this seems dreadfully close to an own goal: no wonder Foster would prefer to forget Little Girl. Yet ranged against the standard 1970s psychothriller, this haunting little picture is in a class of its own.
22 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Disturbing, with some dark themes and subtlety in the playing...
Doylenf7 October 2006
There's not too much to recommend here, except that JODIE FOSTER was always an interesting actress, even as a young girl, but the story could have been much more gripping and taut with suspense.

She never seemed to play the wholesome types, and this is no exception. She's a bright thirteen year-old, living ostensibly with her poet father in a seaside house, very adult in her manners and interests.

She doesn't like the snooping of others who ask too many questions about her quiet life in a house where her father is never seen. ALEXIS SMITH (her landlady) and MARTIN SHEEN (her lecherous son) are among those who do ask too many questions and threaten her isolated and very private existence. Like Miss Foster, their performances are just fine.

All of this keeps the audience interested in finding out what has happened to her father--and what are the dark secrets she is hiding. There are a few unexpected plot twists, but most of the story is told in a very understated way in a style that is not likely to connect with today's audiences who want films with a faster pace.

However, there is a certain subtlety to the proceedings and it does get under your skin if you let yourself fall under the spell of some very good acting. It seems like ideal material for Alfred Hitchcock, who, in this very same year, came up with his poorly received FAMILY PLOT. By comparison, this one rates more attention.

For me, the highlight of the story came when Foster confronts her angry landlady, played in fine form by the still lovely Alexis Smith. Their tense confrontation is well staged and beautifully acted.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Due for re-release
mark.telford25 September 2003
There are some films which strike a chord immediately upon seeing, and stay in one's mind over many years. They act as a reference point for your life and experiences.

For me, this film was one such. I saw this about 4 times when it was released. I was aged 14. Jodie Foster played Rynn, a 13 year old in the film. I was an only child. Rynn was an only child.

(I think this was the first and only time I had a crush on a fictional character - the shots of the birthday cake with facial close-ups are still vivid. The - at the time - exotic kaftans added to the ambience.)

The murders and threatened child abuse aside (!), this is a story of survival, of independence, and of a growing realisation of a need for others.

There are many levels to this movie, and I would love to see this again. Perhaps a DVD release is overdue - even if only to satisfy my own nostalgia.
45 out of 59 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
modest, minimalist thriller
Jonny_Numb22 June 2006
This year's hyped-to-the-skies Internet-predator flick "Hard Candy" owes a great debt to its 30-year old precursor, "The Little Girl Who Lives Down the Lane." A young, well-versed Jodie Foster plays the titular character, who inhabits a lonely house in the woods without any apparent parental supervision. She attracts the attention of the bitchy landlady, her pedophile son (a strong early performance by Martin Sheen), a local cop, and his mischievous son. While the film's central focus is the cover-up of a murder, it also carefully delves into the perceptions adults have of children (and vice versa), not to mention the shifting dynamics of relationships under extreme circumstances. "Little Girl" has a well-developed, almost literary quality to its suspense and characterization--while it delves into some potentially distasteful alleyways, it does so with an admirable restraint that helps heighten the tension.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Mediocre and overrated
Hesse-0219 October 2008
This movie is a bit of a curiosity. I'm not surprised that people picking up the DVD expecting to see a horror movie are a little disappointed. Yet, with the provocative product description one might, at least, expect a thriller. This is how the movie was sold in its day and how it continues to be sold. For me, "The Little Girl Who Lives Down The Lane" has always been an interesting character study--but not one that is that creepy and certainly not in the "horror" genre. Basically fills the need of a middle age pedophile as we get to see Jody (using a body double, as that of her 14 year old sister) in a nude scene, getting in bed with her best friend. I thought the performances were self conscious and the believability of the film to be ridiculous. Could be remade to be much more creepy, much more believable and actually a HORROR picture. As in my view this film has none of the above.
13 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed