The Dupes (1972) Poster

(1972)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Illegal migration (spoilers)
PoppyTransfusion17 August 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Two days before I watched this film 35 people were found concealed inside a freight container in the UK; one had died. This is not an isolated incident nor the worst tragedy to befall illegal migrants.

The Dupes is about three Palestinian men forced to migrate, illegally, to Kuwait in order to survive. They are refugees following the establishment of Israel, living in difficult and impoverished conditions. Abou Kaiss is a middle-aged family man with two sons to support. His land and his trees from which he earned his living as a peasant have been requisitioned by Israel. After much agonising he decides to try and get to Kuwait where he has heard money can be made even though he cannot imagine money as better than trees. Assad is a young man engaged to be married without any economic future. He flees after being accused of a form of treason. Marwan is the youngest of the migrants. His eldest brother was working in Kuwait and had been sending money home to his family, but this ceased when his brother fell in love. His father, in despair, walks out on the family leaving Marwan, the next oldest child, with the burden of supporting his mother and four younger siblings.

Each man journeys to Iraq ready to cross from there into Kuwait. The price the established smugglers seek is too high for Abou Kaiss and Marwan. Assad, having been duped by the smuggler who brought him to Iraq, is suspicious of the Iraqi smugglers and reluctant to pay their price with the conditions they attach. By chance Marwan meets a fellow Palestinian called Abou Kheizaran. He agrees to take Marwan for a much lower price if the latter can find some other men to make the risk of human smuggling economically viable for Kheizaran. Marwan persuades Kaiss and Assad, whom he has met at the same hotel, to join him. Together they embark on a perilous journey by water truck under the charge and care of Kheizaran.

Kheizaran is another Palestinian exile living and working in Kuwait for a wealthy employer. We learn that Kheizaran was badly wounded fighting for Palestine and his wounds cost him his manhood; whether this means his penis or testicles is not made clear. We know only that he is impotent. He is embittered and has sold his soul to money and, as he repeats, the more he makes the more he wants. He has a religious conversation with Assad on the road and they debate if he is an angel to the 3 men or not. Assad concludes that angel or not Kheizaran is their chief.

The film is full of religious images and fatalistic philosophy. The traditional Palestinian world rubs up against the modern world dominated by war and money. In such a world men are reduced to being rats; the big rats prey on the smaller ones and so on. There is little honour or trust between men; relationship are replaced by pecuniary interest. The land is forsaken and "a man without a homeland will have no grave in the earth".

So the four men embark on the drive from Bassra into Kuwait during which Kheizaran must smuggle them through two checkpoints. The journey is undertaken in the morning when the traffic is less and the scrutiny of vehicles reduced because of the rapidly increasing temperature. Kheizaran has calculated how long it will take him to negotiate each checkpoint and the calculation is to the minute. The 3 men must hide in his water tank at each crossing and the tank, which is empty, is a furnace in the desert heat. The difference between life and death in such circumstances is seconds as the average human can survive for 3 minutes without air and up to 10 minutes with air in extreme heat.

The first crossing works according to Kheizaran's plan but even then the men are shown to be suffering horribly. At the second crossing Kheizaran is delayed by a bureaucrat interested in the spurious stories he has heard of Kheizaran's amorous adventures in Bassra. The tension during this scene is as fierce as the sun; it is almost noon and the delay costs Kheizaran a minute or two. But this extra minute or two is too long for the 3 men. Kheizaran opens the water tank as soon as it is safe to stop after the check point. I held my breath. A bead of sweat from Kheizaran's face fell onto the tank and fizzled so hot was the outer surface of the tank. From within the tank there was no sound or movement; the men were dead.

The final scene was wrenching as Kheizaran dumps their bodies on a rubbish tip and, as we see the arm of Abou Kaiss reaching upwards, distorted and grotesque, the opening lines about a man without a homeland having no grave in the earth are repeated with the most ominous effect.

The Dupes/Al-Makhdu'un reminds me of The Wages of Fear/La Salarie de la Peu in terms of its structure - a long slow build establishing characters before a nail biting climax that ends in tragedy. The two films are similar in theme too; the perils men will face in order to make money to survive. The film is a tour de force even though its slow beginning taxes the viewer. Made in 1973 it is contemporary in its concerns about the Palestinians, illegal migration by economic refugees and the risks they have to endure to make their journeys. The film is a salutary reminder that whatever the cost illegal migrants are to their host countries, the costs are sometimes much higher for them and those who never succeeded in their journey.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Fine, but difficult
Virginia_Farmboy30 August 2007
I watched this film in college. "The Dupes," as it is known in English, is the story of three Palestinian men searching for a job opportunity in Kuwait. They must be smuggled in, and they must traverse the desert under the searing sun to get into Iraq and then to their destination. "The Dupes" reminded me of a Bergman film, in that characters are philosophical and the focus is on them rather than a plot. Perhaps it was because "The Dupes" is a black-and-white foreign film that it reminded me of the late director, but who knows? This was not an easy film. For one thing, the subtitles are white and in a black and white film, especially one set in the desert, these can be very hard to read. I missed some sentences. There are also a few too many flashbacks, which makes the story hard to follow. However, there are some good moments. The film has some of the best desert scenes I'm ever seen, including two where the smuggled Palestinians must hide in a blazing hot iron truck while they pass through checkpoints.

There is a political message supporting Palestinian statehood. However, the film works better as a study of the characters and there motivations for risking their lives for work.
9 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Newly topical Arab classic.
thebarriepattison15 May 2024
Tewfik Saleh's newly restored 1972 Al-Makhdu'un/Duped / The Decieved has abruptly become topical. I just watched it in a lecture theatre in Sydney University a minute's walk from the tent camp set up by Gaza protesters there. Predictably discussion centered on the situation in Palestine rather than the film.

This one can be considered authentic Arab cinema, the major movie culture that English speakers know the least, shot in Syria & Iraq by an Egyptian film maker who trained in Paris. He made a succession of these issues-based films contrasting with the entertainment films done around them, before moving to Nationalist material, including a Sadam Hussain biography. The Dupes drew the attention of Martine Scorsese's Film Preservation Foundation and reaches us as an excellent transfer.

The film's Palestinian story is drawn from "The Men in the Sun" a novel by Marxist writer Ghassan Kanafani, later killed by MOSSAD. The origin is visible in occasional literary language - "A man without a country will have no grave on this earth" or Kheir-Halouani's recalling "whenever I'm lying on the ground, I can smell the scent of my wife's hair when she's just had a cold bath." Commentators more familiar with the work than I am detect symbolic references to betrayal by the Arab leadership.

The early material is confusing, particularly to someone not up to speed on the 1948 Nakba when Israel's Declaration of Independence was followed by the deportation of three quarters of a million Palestinians to West Bank refugee camps. Footage of Mohamed Kheir-Halouani, struggling across the desert on foot, is cross cut with historical actuality and scenes of camp life.

Potentially interesting elements vanish - like the school teacher, whose European suit contrasts with his students' families' traditional clothing and is unable to lead Koranic prayers the way his predecessor did.

The development becomes more linear as extra characters are added, refugees seeking refuge in Kuwait and a paid job that will mean better lives than the ones they have. Kheir-Halouani's family have been traditional peasant farmers for generations, and he dreams he will escape dependence on UNRWA Aid Packages and be able to own a piece of land and a couple of olive trees. Self reliant young Bassan Lofti Abou-Ghazala will avoid a marriage, planned for him when he and the wife were babies, and school boy Saleh Kholoki (?) will be able to support the family left destitute when his father divorced them to escape their mud walled home to his new peg legged wife's house with its concrete roof.

The film doesn't field two dimensional villains. The deadbeat dad offers the family a room in his new home, which the boy's mother refuses and he is moved at the boy's departure. The women are passive but sympathetically drawn - supporting the men's choices or preparing a meal for the trip. These would-be emigrants meet when they face people smugglers who they distrust - inset scene of being left to walk across the wasteland to rejoin a driver at the highway, only to find no one waiting and depend on hitching. Instead the trio are recruited by truck driver Abdul Rahman Al Rashi, who is a defeated veteran of the British army, injured in the war. ("I lost my manhood and my nation") All that remains to him is accumulating money. He proposes an illegal border crossing in the tank of his worn water truck. The film's ambivalence is particularly strong with his character.

This is the point where The Dupes pulls away from a being a simple curiosity, with strong visuals and intense development. Images of the black tanker crossing the desert under the blazing sun (border patrols search vehicles at night), as the score strikes up, come punctuated by dialogue exchanges where the driver exhorts his passengers to endure. Comparisons with Salaire de la peur are common but the film also evokes La Bataille du rail, The English Patient or even Plunder Road. The imagery becomes extraordinary - cross cutting the tank thumping sounds and the border post air conditioning units, sweat evaporating on the metal surface, the dead hand raised against the sky. The film's statement, its condemnation, is stronger for not being verbalised.

Technique is uneven. Even for the intended audience, the time structure of the opening must have been a challenge. The scene cross cutting the baby and the new foliage is is laboured symbolism and shots of Al Rashi driving are obviously filmed in a stationary vehicle. His abrupt stop with the sun in his face is awkward.

Seen in isolation The Dupes is a finally impressive curiosity. Placing it in the context of it's society and its film industry would be fascinating. We can only hope.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed