The Tales of Beatrix Potter (1971) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Stunning
lucyrfisher4 January 2022
The costumes are amazing recreations of Beatrix Potter's characters. High points are Jeremy Fisher and the mice destroying the dolls' house. Squirrel Nutkin is pretty good too. The dancing is fantastic. And there's no CGI, Jemima is flying on a wire. And the dancers are neither slowed down nor speeded up. Their flying leaps are real! (I've always felt Jeremy Fisher was a distant cousin.)

There are hints of danger with the cat looking down the mousehole, the silent, blinking owl, and the strings of sausages that give the game away. The stories are much, MUCH darker! I'm glad no rats featured, and the pike that nearly gets Jeremy is a mere shadow.

Only flaw - it goes on just a bit too long, and the pastiche music gets a bit samey.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Heartwarming
Leofwine_draca28 December 2021
Warning: Spoilers
I hadn't heard of this one before the wonderful Talking Pictures TV Channel here in the UK showed it this Christmas. I found it quite charming, a clever and heartfelt adaptation of the famous stories featuring an all-star cast of beloved characters who mingle and mix in a story told via ballet. The dancing works well and the costumes and sets are truly lovely; only the hardest of hearts would find anything to dislike here.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
This promised to be a charming ballet film, and it definitely IS!
TheLittleSongbird10 May 2009
This was an absolute delight from start to finish. The choreography was fantastic, as always with the great Frederick Ashton, who himself appears as Mrs Tiggy Winkle. The music was just outstanding, with some elements of Tchaikovsky, some elements of french opera buffe, and some elements of pure English lyricalism, all of which are needed to make a charming ballet production work. I was amazed by the production values, the costumes and scenery were so beautifully designed by Christine Edzard, the whole thing was exquisite to look at. The dancers like Wayne Sleep, Lesley Collier and Alexander Grant brought their charming characters to life through their faultless dancing. My personal favourite was Jemima Puddle Duck flying through the air to the very Swan Lake finale-like music. The mice dance was really charming, in possibly the best known segment of the whole production. I grew up treasuring the stories from Beatrix Potter, and I thought this gave them justice. Another thing that impressed me was the contrast of reality and the imagination, people complained of the Beatrix Potter as a girl bits slowing it down, but as she is only there for about three scenes, I thought it was very effective. All in all, if you love ballet, like I do, and I am 17, and you haven't seen this already, give yourself a treat for an hour and a half. 10/10 Bethany Cox.
28 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Fantastic production
Blueghost20 June 2003
I caught this on HBO years ago, and was dazzled by the production values. I was even more stunned by the fact that it was a 1971 production: a period in film that was very transitional for children's venues. The sets, costumes and dancing are all executed with a great amount of care in this production. Grab a copy for your kids or grandkids, and watch it with them. You won't be dissapointed.

One can only hope that it will see a DVD release someday.
19 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Tales of Beatrix Potter
jboothmillard22 September 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I remember my Mum having the Beatrix Potter book collection, and I watched the animated TV series The World of Peter Rabbit and Friends as a kid. It was only years later I discovered this curious film featuring the well-known characters, performed in ballet, and I was unsure if it was going to be really strange or rather interesting. Basically, Beatrix Potter (Erin Geraghty) is seen as a little girl drawing animals and imagining them coming to life. Her imagination and iconic characters are depicted and performed by the Dancers of the Royal Ballet, telling the stories through expressive dance. Starring Sir Frederick Ashton, choreographer of the film, as Mrs. Tiggy-Winkle, Alexander Grant as Pigling Bland / Peter Rabbit, Julie Wood as Mrs. Tittlemouse, Ann Howard as Jemima Puddle-Duck, Michael Coleman as Jeremy Fisher, Wayne Sleep as Squirrel Nutkin / Tom Thumb, Sally Ashby as Mrs. Pettitoes / Tabitha, Bob Mead as Fox, Keith Martin as Johnny Townmouse, Garry Grant as Alexander, and Brenda Last as Black Berkshire Pig. I will be honest, I did giggle for the first few minutes, but slowly I realised it was to be taken seriously as a "passion project", it is simplistic with no dialogue and only the movement to tell you what is going on, some costumes are a little big for the dancers but are otherwise splendid, the dancing is good, and the score by John Lanchbery is lovely, not the sort of film I was expecting to kind of like, an alright musical. It was nominated the BAFTAs for Best Art Direction, and Best Costume Design. Worth watching!
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Wonderful And Charming Family Ballet Film. Perfect For The Easter Season.
johnstonjames17 April 2011
Warning: Spoilers
saw this movie when i was very young and was charmed. i now watch it every Easter season and still remained as coddled and cuddled by it as i was as a child.

it's delightful. it is also a beautiful example of Ballet and cinema. it boast some of the most beautiful photography to come out of England to date, which is no small feat considering that English cinematographers are amongst the very skilled and best. the sets, costumes and critter make-up is also equally accomplished.

with so many young people lacking in any traditional culture or understanding of the arts, this is a perfect way to expose them to something other than most of the mindless entertainment that targets them. at least kids will learn something here about the history of the arts and culture. anything is better than bringing them up on moronic commercial jingles and shows that are ALWAYS tied into merchandising. or pumping them up on video games that teach them nothing more than mindless winning and competition.

not to mention this is a very good understanding of Potter's early life and how she became inspired to draw. it's probably a better interpretation than the mushed down, Saturday morning cartoon interpretation with Renee Zellwigger.

if you are tired of your kids learning nothing but the "value of their own backyard", or how to "neutralize" the enemy, than start having them watch things of culture and breeding early on. who knows? maybe they'll turn out "genteel" than a "thug".
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Delightful for both children and grown-ups
richlieu10 October 1998
A time-less masterpiece based on Beatrix Potter´s children´s stories. Beautifully acted (danced) and delightful in every way. Watch out for Joan Benham in the small silent role of Beatrix´ childhood nurse
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Nostalgic and charming
napev724 December 2021
This was the almost certainly the first film I saw in the cinema, which would have been in the spring or summer of 1971, when I turned 8 in June of that year. The only image that stuck in my mind from that occasion though, was the final shot at the end when Miss Tiggywinkle runs across a meadow and disappears into the distance. The next time I saw the film was on TV in the 1980's although on that occasion I only caught the last five minutes or so, but this confirmed that I had correctly remembered the Miss Tiggywinkle shot at the end.

However, today (24/12/2021) I was able to see the film in its entirety for the first time since 1971, when the British TV channel 'Talking Pictures' screened it. As an adult, my view of the film was very different from when I saw it as a child. It seemed a little overlong to me and the ballet sequences a little repetitive but otherwise it was a very impressive film. I particularly liked the two scenes when mocked-up old newspapers are shown. In the first, the date appears to be 2nd February 1894 (which would correspond to the time that Beatrix Potter was writing the stories) but in the second, only the month (July) is clearly distinguishable.

There are a couple of other points worth mentioning. Firstly, Talking Pictures gave the film a PG rather than a U certificate which was rather surprising. The only explanation I can think for this may be the fact that we see a man (Beatrix's father?) smoking early on in the film. Incidentally, neither this actor or the woman sitting opposite him (presumably Beatrix's mother) are listed in the credits, which is rather odd given that everyone else is.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed