A Clear and Present Danger (TV Movie 1970) Poster

(1970 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Hays Stowe vs. the Smog Monster (Godzilla on Deck)
GaryPeterson678 November 2022
This was a conscientious film painfully self-conscious of the fact it was conscientious. Every quick-cut frame and out-of-focus montage of Hays Stowe walking through Chamberton with smokestacks belching and billowing pollution cried out that this was an important film with an important message.

As much as I tried to resist its earnestness (that long montage-filled stroll after learning of his friend's death), I soon found myself caught up and swept away. The script was so well written, and the all-star cast lent great credibility and urgency to the unfolding story.

The plot is simple: Hays Stowe's beloved law professor died from asthma brought on by the smog in the fictional city of Chamberton in an unidentified state. Hays believes air pollution is a "clear and present danger" and wants to make it his defining issue. His father, three-term Senator Holden Stowe, who has groomed his RFK-lookalike son to be his successor, strenuously objects. So too do Hays' two advisors, a proto-Carville and Stephanopoulos pair of professional spin doctors.

The film deftly avoids stridency and does present both sides of the issue. Jeff Corey plays a factory owner who convincingly contends that air pollution is the byproduct of American industry that affords us the lifestyles we enjoy. The pollution-spewing factories also provide work for thousands of people.

Conversely, although portrayed sympathetically, Professor Duke the ecologist is revealed to be an eccentric at best and a hysterical alarmist at worst. Coming unglued, he upends Hays' breakfast table, frantically piling up dishes to illustrate his point in a foreshadowing of Richard Dreyfuss' meltdown in CLOSE ENCOUNTERS.

A more rational and respected voice is the doctor played by a hangdog-faced Jack Albertson, utterly exhausted after treating dozens of Chamberton's citizens who have succumbed to the smog. Even disbelieving city attorney Pat Hingle is swayed by what he sees when cajoled into coming to the hospital at four in the morning by Senator Holden Stowe.

That leads into what was actually my biggest takeaway. Politics is all about power and leveraging it--for good or ill. Sen. Stowe can pressure people, dispatch people, and even ensure his son a plum guest spot on an influential talk show. Hays Stowe, a functionary in the attorney general's office, gets hung up on and called a "jackass" by the city attorney who all but tells him to "get outta Dodge." The film closes with Hays realizing one must wield power to get things done.

That said, one high hurdle to clear in my enjoyment of this film was the arrogance and imperiousness of Hays Stowe. For a man who boasts of being raised on a farm, he sure is accustomed to being waited upon, is rude to his chauffeur (blithely strolling away after he opens his car door for him), to the phone operator (who is berated for simply doing her job), and his advisor (to whom he barks a command t go to the hospital on a fool's errand). I also found his relationship to his daughter lacking in affection. His call to tell her his friend died was just bizarre. "You asked about Professor Shamokin and I evaded your question... I just thought you deserved an honest answer." Who talks that way to his own little kid? Hays was so thoroughly a politico he couldn't turn it off.

Raising the hurdle even higher was my lingering fond memories of a movie in which Hal Holbrook played a much looser and hipper senator: WILD IN THE STREETS from two years earlier. Contrasting the two performances of similar characters is a testimony to Holbrook's talent. I eventually warmed to Hays as much as one could. He's a chilly guy (that ludicrously long kiss with his wife Sharon Acker was good acting because passion and romance seemed wholly absent from his character).

Hays was self-absorbed too, like when he blindsided his advisors at a press conference by quipping, almost as an afterthought, that he would not be seeking public office. That remark also rudely upstaged Prof. Duke who stammered and sputtered on about smog to a room hemorrhaging its audience as reporters fled to phone in Stowe's startling remark. Only Hollis Kent, the William F. Buckley-style talk show host, saw Hays' refusal to run for the savvy political maneuver it turned out to be.

Robert Quarry played that TV interrogator with aplomb. This same year he played the title role in COUNT YORGA, VAMPIRE, so talk about versatility! E. G. Marshall played Senator Stowe and was at this time already playing Dr. David Craig on THE BOLD ONES: THE NEW DOCTORS. (One can hear a page for "Dr. Craig" in an earlier scene with Jack Albertson.) Joseph Campanella, who played Hays' advisor Jordan Boyle, was currently co-starring in THE BOLD ONES: THE LAWYERS. That casting had me confident that this film was intended from the outset to become a series and a spoke in the BOLD ONES wheel of dramas.

One more cast note: I got a kick out of seeing Bernie Hamilton blowing his stack and hollering at Holbrook, which schtick would become Hamilton's stock in trade a few years later on STARSKY & HUTCH.

Asking for a friend: Why didn't anybody say "goodbye" at the end of a phone call? Literally every phone call in this movie ended abruptly. People just routinely hung up on one another. Even Hays' daughter hangs up on her dad without an "I love you, Daddy, bye." Okay, a mere bagatelle in the big picture, but it bugged me each and every time (and there are dozens of phone calls in this movie, which must have been sponsored by Ma Bell).

In the end, a compelling movie worth sticking with through the end. Historically significant too as it aired in March 1970, a mere month before the first Earth Day. With its still relevant ecological message I am surprised it slipped into obscurity.

I enjoyed this movie on election day, and it effectively underscored the necessary evil that is politics and the power wielded by the privileged few who play that game.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Worthwhile Introduction to a Rare Political Drama
Aldanoli31 December 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Back in 1957, Rod Serling complained that he was prohibited by the "standards and practices" folks at a television network from depicting real legislative issues when he wrote "The Arena," a "Studio One" drama about the U. S. Congress: "I was not permitted to have my senators discuss any current or pressing problem. To talk of tariff was to align oneself with the Republicans; to talk of labor was to suggest control by the Democrats. To say a single thing germane to the current political scene was absolutely prohibited." And so, Serling said, he had to have senators standing around arguing about whether to "move the previous question," which was to say, babbling about nothing.

Whatever else one might say about "A Clear and Present Danger," this two-hour television movie that became the pilot for the 1970-71 series "The Senator," it was definitely about something. It was broadcast in March, 1970 and introduced the character of future U. S. Senator Hays Stowe, played by Hal Holbrook.

Stowe works for the U. S. Attorney General's office, and is the son of a sitting U. S. senator (played by E. G. Marshall) who announces that he will not run for re-election. The younger Stowe decides to try to seek his father's Senate seat. His primary motivation is that his former law professor and mentor has just died of emphysema - a condition that his doctor (played by Jack Albertson, in an unusual role for him) says was exacerbated by air pollution. And pollution, especially air pollution, was a hot topic in 1970 - the first Earth Day, for example, was held a month after this film debuted that spring.

Though it was created on a television movie budget, director James Goldstone tries to compensate for that with some unusual choices in editing. Besides some aerial footage of what is clearly Los Angeles (though the story is set in a fictional town called "Chamberton"), the movie has lots of lengthy shots of Stowe just . . . Walking around, while footage of smoking factory chimneys and other sources of air pollution are superimposed over these shots of him, in a kind of double-exposure. It's a rarely-used technique; one of the few other films to employ it was that tale of foreboding and dread, "Picnic at Hanging Rock" (1975), which likewise spent a fair amount of time simply trying to create a mood.

Stowe makes himself a figure of controversy when he supports the apocalyptic warnings of an impending air pollution emergency provided by a university science professor, played with scenery-chewing relish by Mike Kellin. The professor's histrionics, of course, only alienate everyone except for Stowe himself.

Curiously, the warnings of the dangers of air pollution are based on some real events, one of them cited in the film -- the so-called "killer smog" that enveloped Donora, Pennsylvania in 1948, ultimately killing 20 people and caused thousands respiratory problems. (A similar event, not mentioned in the movie, was a 1952 pollution emergency in London that was recently depicted in "The Crown.") Naturally, Stowe finds himself blocked at every turn as he tries to get people to take the professor's warning seriously; most serious politicians (including Stowe's senator-father) consider the professor a crank, and Stowe's father is outraged that his son appears to be throwing away his political career over a non-issue.

Besides the sober, thoughtful Holbrook and E. G. Marshall, the film boasts many other familiar faces. Joe Campanella is Stowe's closest political consultant who wants him to run for his father's seat, while Sharon Acker has a thankless part as Stowe's wife; and a 12 year-old Cindy Eilbacher plays their daughter. As already noted, the film succeeded in launching the television series "The Senator" as a part of the rotating series "The Bold Ones" that coming fall, where both Acker and Eilbacher continued playing those roles. (Curiously, Campanella and Marshall both were also on "The Bold Ones," but in other rotating segments, and other actors replaced them once "The Senator" was picked up.)

Unfortunately, because the series rotated along with those otherwise unrelated segments (a lawyer show, a doctor show, etc.), only eight additional segments were produced. They were certainly "ripped from the headlines" -- like this film's emphasis on air pollution, episodes of "The Senator" included a two-part story dealing with a campus shooting of protestors by National Guardsmen, a physical threat to Sen. Stowe, ethical lapses by politicians, and the problems of the welfare state.

The show is notable for winning five Emmys, including one for Holbrook and another as the best drama on television, almost simultaneous with its cancellation. Its failure is likely attributable to viewers not wanting to "escape" to a drama strongly echoing much that they had just seen on the news every night. A pity, because like "A Clear and Present Danger" itself, the whole series is worthwhile. At least it's available on DVD.

NOTE: This film also has fallen into obscurity in part because it has been overshadowed by an otherwise unrelated 1994 Harrison Ford film that shares the same name.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
One of the earliest films to seriously deal with the topic of air pollution.
mainsqueeze10 June 2004
Having recently just seen THE DAY AFTER TOMORROW, I was reminded of this movie, which when made in 1970, was prescient. In a time when the first Earth Day was still in the planning stages, the film was a dramatization of the possibility of man-made environmental disaster, at a time when very few people were acknowledging the need for any environmental protection at all. While I saw it 34 years ago when it originally aired, I have never forgotten it.

Regrettably, the issues involved seem to be the same: the unwillingness of the corporate / business community to place the health and safety of society above their profits. I regard this movie as a harbinger of environmental cinema, in the same way that Rachel Carson's SILENT SPRING made people sit up and take notice of an issue that could no longer be safely ignored. This film, made without the use of today's special effects, dramatically pointed out the potential that could result from unchecked industrial pollution.

For those who disparaged THE DAY AFTER TOMORROW as alarmist and unrealistic, this would be a good film to view, bearing in mind that the 'conventional wisdom' of the time when this was made was much the same, i.e. the world was so big and and a little pollution didn't really matter. In hindsight, A CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER looks positively tame. No one today would look at this film and and label it as fear-mongering.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed