Two Mules for Sister Sara (1970) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
92 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Clint at his best
cutter-1229 April 2005
Sure, he's in the shadow here of his more famous Leone westerns, but this vehicle, amiably directed by Don Siegel and aided by a quirky Ennio Morricone score, is an entertaining little spaghetti western knockoff shot on location in Mexico. Story-wise, it's an old west Heaven Knows Mr. Allison with a comic twist, and with an offbeat nemesis in the French Army. The humorous chemistry between Eastwood's Hogan and MacLaine's Sara at times clicks so well it's hard to believe they reportedly didn't get along very well during production. Though when it comes to Shirley MacLaine nothing really surprises me.

As far as Eastwood's post Spaghetti movies, he's rarely been in better form than this. Essentially continuing his man with no name persona, he gets far more dialogue this time around which fleshes out his character and makes him a little more three dimensional. It's a nice change of pace from the Leone westerns to hear Clint spout a few humorous lines and have the odd hilarious facial expression in between his trademark squinting and snarling and cigar chomping.

Disciples of Leone's trilogy may never warm up to an admittedly hammier Clint in this, but as Clint's Hollywood westerns go, this is a fun and well made duster. Shouldn't be missed.
61 out of 69 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Strange, but solid western
moonspinner5526 May 2002
Curious, unexpectedly talky western set in the Mexican desert. Drifter on horseback saves a nun from rape at the hands of bandits, she saves him by removing an arrow from his shoulder. The rapport between these two couldn't have looked very colorful on the printed page, but by God if stars Clint Eastwood and feisty Shirley MacLaine don't give it color and charisma. The writing isn't very expressive, and there's an odd drop-off in action after the opening sequence, but once you get attuned to the film's rhythm, it surprises you with its resonance. For action buffs, only the final shoot-out will please; for everyone else, a leisurely, though absorbing and entertaining, character-driven change-of-pace. *** from ****
59 out of 69 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Fun Little Western With Eastwood and MacLaine
Don Siegel's "Two Mules For Sister Sara" starring Clint Eastwood and Shirley MacLaine is certainly not one of the brilliant Westerns with Eastwood, but it is a very well directed, greatly acted and very amusing little Western comedy with good wit that highly entertains. Eastwood, who is cool as always, and the lovable MacLaine match perfectly, and the plot has some nice twists (although it should be said that some of the 'twists' are not really too surprising).

After gunsling Hogan (Eastwood) saves a nun named Sara (MacLaine) from a bunch of guys who wanted to rape her in the middle of the desert by shooting them, he now has to take care of her, which annoys him. It's a time of revolution against the French in Mexico, and while Hogan, who is interested in quick money, will fight for whichever side pays well (which happens to be the revolutionaries), his new traveling companion Sara is very obviously an idealistic supporter of the revolutionary Juaristas...

As mentioned above, "Two Mules For Sister Sara" can in no way come up to the brilliance of Eastwood movies such as Leone's Dollar Trilogy (few movies can) or Eastwood's very own "High Plains Drifter" of 1973. Nevertheless, it is a good little western with a lot of charm and wit, which provides an exciting story, action and great entertainment as well as many good laughs. Clint Eastwood has always been the epitome of coolness, especially in his Westerns, and MacLaine is great in her role of the feisty sister Sara. Overall, "Two Mules For Sister Sara" is a highly entertaining Western Comedy, that will not leave anybody bored. Recommended! 7/10
33 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A very engaging time-passer,....but what about the two mules,....what two mules are they talking about, exactly?!
planktonrules17 August 2006
Warning: Spoilers
This film is a nice change of pace for a Clint Eastwood Western. While in some ways Clint's character isn't that much different from some of his previous cowboys (he's great with a gun and is motivated by greed....until the end...just like in FOR A FEW DOLLARS MORE), the chemistry of adding Shirley MacLaine really changes the film. Together, they create an engaging, though not exactly believable pair. However, despite being tough to believe, the film is so much fun and written and acted so well, that you really don't mind.

The film itself was made in Mexico with many Mexican actors. This, combined with a somewhat restrained score by Ennio Morricone, make this movie look in many ways like a "Spaghetti Western", though it was financed and directed by Americans. For these reasons, the film is like a bridge from Eastwood's earlier westerns to his more recent ones.

About the only negative about the film other than how difficult it was to believe the plot at times, was that the "secret" about MacLaine's character didn't seem like that big of a surprise,...yet the supremely smart and savvy Eastwood had no idea! THIS was the hardest part to believe! However, the film is still great fun and well worth seeing. My wife, who hates westerns, actually watched it with me and enjoyed it so I guess this cowboy pic might have a wider audience than some westerns.

By the way, which mules, exactly, were they referring to?! This confusing title had me thinking that I must have missed something!
47 out of 56 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Fun with Eastwood and MacLaine
Maziun30 November 2013
Clint and Shirley have great chemistry together. The movie is light on action and works as a lighthearted comedy. The music by Ennio Morricone is cool . The movie is really funny in some places like the talk about the ass. The dialogue is often witty. There is no unnecessary violence. The movie has moments when it gets little serious , but not too serious . The plot is not quite predictable as one could suspect. The final battle is quite exciting.

Despite what IMDb tells you this is not really a war movie. It is set during war , but it's western. It's one of Eastwood weaker westerns , but still a good and enjoyable movie. I give it 7/10.

P.S. For those who don't understood the title - Eastwood is stubborn as mule , get it ? It's a joke.
14 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Superb film. Under rated and highly entertaining.
eaglejet9827 November 2003
Warning: Spoilers
Great flick.

The director used an ingenious combination of Clint Eastwood's `Man with no name' character and Shirley MacLaine's charm to make a funny and entertaining movie.

POSSIBLE SPOILER: `Every man's got a right to be a sucker once', as Hogan says. But he's no sucker and Sarah is no nun. Every aspect of the film works. For a while the audience actually believes Sarah is a nun and Hogan will never romance her. Outside of that, the rest of the plot is a classic Eastwood western, with him chomping the smoked out cigar and tossing sticks of dynamite. The plot is predictable, but that is what we want. We want Hogan to out gun the bad guys and get the gold. And somehow we know there has to be some sort of romantic relationship for Sarah and Hogan.

Once we find out Sarah's real profession, it all fits. Bad guys lose; Hogan and Sarah win, and ride off together. The last scene is hilarious. We know Hogan is going to be henpecked the rest of his married life and we know he will love every minute of it.
11 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Enjoyable Western /comedy in which Eastwood and MacLaine play a funny and amusing couple
ma-cortes29 March 2013
Well crafted Western with interesting and engaging screenplay written by Albert Maltz from a story by Bud Boetticher . It deals with a nun called Sara (Shirley MacLaine) and two mules (second mule was actually a burro) , as she is attacked by three outlaws , being rescued by a drifter named Hogan (Clint Eastwood) , who is on his way across Mexican desert and becoming wary of her religious nature . Gringo Hogan arrives in Mexico do some reconnaissance, for a next mission to capture a French fort , so he decides to help her in return for information about the defences . Inevitably both of them become good friends but Sara has a twisted secret . At the end takes place a needlessly violent slaughter against Maximiliano army . Hogan is the deadliest man alive , he takes on a whole army with two guns and a fistful of dynamite! .

This classic as well as diverting Western results to be a good fun that contains thrills , humor , slow and deliberating filming , elaborate shoot-outs , and portentous battles with bloodbaths included . It's a special following to original ¨Dollars trilogy¨ with Eastwood as ¨Man with no name¨ ; as this new role as Hogan bears remarkable resemblance . Clint returns his classic character of ¨The man with no name¨ and MacLaine is an unlikely nun in this amusing comedy Western . Shirley MacLaine did not get along during the shoot with director Don Siegel , with whom she openly fought . While in Austria filming ¨When eagles dare¨, Clint Eastwood was approached with the script by Elizabeth Taylor, Richard Burton's wife at the time, with the notion of starring together in the film ; however, Universal Pictures was unwilling to pay Taylor's high salary . Being a Mexico/USA co-production in the picture appears numerous Mexican secondary actors such as Manuel Fabregas , Enrique Lucero , Armando Silvestre , among others . Maestro Ennio Morricone composes a groundbreaking and streaking soundtrack , including some comic touches . Colorful and evocative cinematography in Panavision by excellent Mexican cameraman Gabriel Figueroa and uncredited Robert Surtees , being filmed in Cuaútla, Morelos, Jantetelco, Tlayacapan, Mexico .

The motion picture was rightly produced by Martin Rackin and well directed by Donald Siegel . His first feature as a director was 1946's The Verdict (1946). He made his reputation in the early and mid-'50s with a series of tightly made, expertly crafted, tough but intelligent "B" pictures , among them : The Lineup (1958), Riot in Cell Block 11 (1954), Invasion of the body snatchers (1956)), then graduated to major "A" films in the 1960s and early 1970s. He made several "side trips" to television, mostly as a producer . Siegel directed what is generally considered to be Elvis Presley's best picture, Flamingo Star (1960). All of Eastwood's later Western and his ¨Dirty Harry¨ movies owe a considerable debt to Sergio Leone and Donald Siegel . As Donald directed Eastwood in various films , such as : Coogan's bluff , The beguiled , Dirty Harry , Escape from Alcatraz and , of course , this ¨ Two mules and sister Sara¨. He had a long professional relationship and personal friendship with Clint Eastwood, who has often said that everything he knows about filmmaking he learned from Don Siegel . ¨Two mules and sister Sara¨ is an enjoyable film for Clint Eastwood and Donald Siegel enthusiasts , including their usual trademarks , it's full of which made their films so memorable, others might find it a bit long but no one can deny its sense of style what achieved a great burst of world-wide popularity .
13 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Nuns and Cowboys: together at last.
Doc-17220 July 1999
The most used formula for Westerns would have to be this: approximately two to five people thrown together by dire circumstances where they're forced to brave the wilds with only their wits, each other and maybe a couple rifles. They focus mainly on character development, character interaction and the bond that develops during these manliest of adventures. Now, given this, what better combination of people is there than a nun and a cowboy? You're right! There isn't any!

Now just because the leading lady is a nun, don't think there isn't any sexual tension. It's sexual tensions abound! Not only that but it's a fun, well-made movie. Shirley MacLaine was great and, lets face it, Clint Eastwood was born to make westerns. Well, maybe not "make" them ... but he's a great cowboy. Well directed, well paced, good story, good acting and it stars a nun and a cowboy. The opening music didn't "do it" for me but even that would probably grow on me. I fully endorse this movie. Look for "Two Mules for Sister Sara" T-shirts with myself in the background giving the thumbs-up.
42 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"Sister, you wanna bless 'em, you bless 'em dry."
classicsoncall8 September 2007
Warning: Spoilers
"Two Mules for Sister Sara" is actually a pretty cool sounding name for the story, cooler I suppose than 'Disabled Mule and Replacement Burro for Sister Sara' would have been. Western movie titles as late as the 1950's often had nothing to do with the story, but this one at least came fairly close. Close also in identifying the character of Sister Sara (Shirley MacLaine), I don't think Hooker Sara would have cut it.

All in all though, this one's a fairly entertaining Western, made so by the banter between the good sister and Clint Eastwood's character Hogan. I lost some interest toward the end of the film when attention turned to the hostilities between the Mexican Army and the French Cavalry, probably because of unfamiliarity with that piece of history. By that time, and with the revelation of Sara's real identity, I started questioning why she went to all the trouble of those intricate masquerades in honoring religious custom, like praying at the shrine, when Hogan would have been none the wiser. It made for good filler, but the question for a pretender like Sara would have been - why bother?

For his part, Eastwood tones down the Man With No Name menace effectively to pull off the relationship with MacLaine. I thought the dialog between them relating to sexual awareness by religious was handled rather maturely, with neither character having to resort to cliché or embarrassment. Still, I can't quite picture MacLaine as a prostitute for the story's twist, she just doesn't have the face for it. Let's picture Jane Fonda in the role, shall we.

If you're on the fence about watching the flick, the opening Ennio Morricone score might just be the grabber, with the electronic donkey bray calling to mind that ersatz holiday jingle, Dominic The Christmas Donkey. It resurfaces from time to time again in just the right spots. That, along with Sister Sara's colorful riding technique, gives me a pretty good idea why Don Siegel's name appears on a headstone in "High Plains Drifter".

Hey now, can you REALLY do that with a dead rattlesnake's tail?
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The film echoes "The African Queen," but...
Nazi_Fighter_David2 September 2000
With the intervention of Napoleon III of France, Archduque Maximilian was installed as emperor in Mexico but Mexican countrymen known as Juaristas (Juarez' resistance) were fighting to demonstrate that their country could act independently, that - as the reform contended - all men were equal under law, and that foreign monarchical adventures in Mexico were futile...

Sister Sara (Shirley MacLaine), presumably a nun, has adopted their cause and is being pursued by the French army for raising money to the Juaristas... Hogan (Clint Eastwood) is a wonder obliged to neither party... He appears unexpectedly when Sister Sara is about to be raped by three men... Fortunately for her, he kills them all...

But unlike the 'Man With No Name,' Eastwood doesn't turn and ride away... He escorts the good-looking nun in her mission...

But the nun's strange behavior intrigues his curiosity... She smokes cigars, she drinks whiskey and her language comes to be every day more profane...

Hogan's fascination with her arrives at its peak when she removes an Indian arrow from his shoulder, having rendering him half insensible by intoxicating him with shots of Whiskey...

After joining her to blow up a French supply train, he is persuaded to help a group of Juaristas led by Colonel Beltran (Manolo Fabregas) in a final attack on a French garrison...

The climax of "Two Mules for Sister Sara" displays the differences between Leone's conclusion which the 'Stranger' merely disappears into the mists of time... The change of image didn't excite the audience leaving the picture with enough nostalgia for the myth of the loner, the super hero, the 'Man With No Name.'

The film (beautifully shot in Color) is really a two-character story... The interesting team gives amusing and tender performances... The motion picture echoes "The African Queen," but is far away from being Hepburn/Bogart exciting adventure...
40 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Quite underrated
geo-546-61692521 August 2013
To tell you the truth, I expected 'Two Mules for Sister Sara' to be a mediocre movie, only trying to take advantage of Eastwood's success with Sergio Leone's film. However, it came to become one of my favourite westerns, even though I've seen a handful of them.

Despite its naivety, the film has a good screenplay. Eastwood played well, but MacLaine offered without a doubt the best performance. The music, composed by Ennio Morricone, was magnificent.

The movie was perhaps too talky for a western, giving us some memorable quotes though. Also, many goofs were present, including the dynamite usage, downgrading the overall result.

I definitely recommend 'Two Mules for Sister Sara' to Eastwood and western fans. From my point of view, it surely isn't a masterpiece, but it is good work, long forgotten.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
" I figured there was only going to be one funeral, Catholic! "
thinker169110 October 2007
When the French army took control of the country we call Mexico, they counted on one factor to help them subdue the population, . . . fear! The use of Fear, through, intimation, torture, and outright execution worked, but not in the way they thought it would. The French brutality had an effect alright, it had the disastrous consequence of cementing the people, their friends and hundreds of mercenaries into an avenging force. Although there are many stories of the revolution, several stand out as movie classics. The Professionals, is one favorite, another is, "Two Mules for Sister Sara." In this story we have an American mercenary (Clint Eastwood) named Hogan who has bitter memories of the Civil War and decides to try for a quick Gold fortune in Mexico. He agrees to help Mexican Col. Beltran (Manuel Fabregas) take the French Garrison in exchange for half the treasury. Along the way, Hogan is joined by a traveling Catholic Nun, named Sister Sara (Shirley MacLaine) who has more secrets than just fear of being captured by the French. Innicially captured by three whiskey drinking rouges who strip, humiliate and threaten the beautiful Nun, she becomes a surprising and necessary ally. In their wondering, they save each other's life until the end, when Hogan is completely shocked with Sister Sara as she reveals her most guarded secret. I loved the movie, especially it's memorable and haunting theme at the beginning of the film. Superb! ****
38 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Pain in the... donkey.
Pjtaylor-96-13804418 November 2020
'Two Miles For Sister Sara (1970)', the second collaboration between Eastwood and Siegel, sees a straight-shooting mercenary agree to escort a nun on the run to safety after rescuing her from a trio of thugs who thought they'd found an easy target. As the pair progress along their journey, they find that they have more in common than they may have first thought - including a shared destination, enemy and penchant for drinking. Indeed, the eponymous nun isn't necessarily all she appears to be (that's all I'll say for fear of spoiling things), which adds an interesting twist to her character and allows for several little surprises to amuse you as the piece moves towards its exciting shootout of an ending. The focal pair have a strained but consistent relationship that builds believably over the course of the narrative. Their comic interactions are pretty much as entertaining as the action set-pieces; this keeps the film enjoyable throughout, even when its plot starts to drag a little. In general, the movie is fun. It's a solid western with a strong cast and an even stronger central dynamic. 7/10
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Nunsense!
slokes28 August 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Clint Eastwood's early westerns are generally considered classics, especially the Sergio Leone movies that launched his stardom, not to mention the terrific U.S.-made knock-off, "Hang 'Em High." But he wasn't always so lucky putting on a Stetson. "Paint Your Wagon," his foray into cowboy musical theater, became the stuff of "Simpsons" gags, and then there's "Two Mules For Sister Sara."

While a reliably strong leading man, Eastwood doesn't project much warmth as a romantic partner. For years he seemed to shy away from being partnered with strong actresses on-screen, perhaps sensing they'd show him up with his deliberately limited projection. From his Leone days through to "The Bridges Of Madison County" with Meryl Streep in 1995, "Sister Sara" was the only time he partnered with a name actress, Shirley MacLaine. The two hardly smolder. In fact, she seems less comfortable kissing Clint than she does pulling an arrow from his shoulder.

MacLaine plays Sara, a woman Eastwood's Hogan rescues from a truly lethargic rape scene, only to discover when she puts her clothes on that she is Sister Sara, a nun who needs Hogan's help escaping some French troops chasing her through Mexico.

The presence of French troops in a Western is not the only deliberately incongruous thing about "Sister Sara." For starters, there's a score by Ennio Morricone, clearly mimicking his work on Leone films, only this time slapping on odd electronic noise in the melody meant to sound like mule whinnying, though more resembling an annoying truck-backing-up alarm. There's violence aplenty, some very nasty, yet the overall tone aspires to comedy. Eastwood seems to be playing in one film, MacLaine in another.

Director Don Siegel works hard to get us to buy MacLaine as a nun that sets Hogan's heart afire, leading to awkward dialogue like this, as she helps him ride his horse after he's been wounded:

Him: "I like being in the arms of a good-looking nun. How do you like it, Sister?"

Her: "The Church allows this for the sake of your safety but you must not take liberties!"

MacLaine doesn't look all that great. Maybe she was miserable from fighting with Eastwood and Siegel. Maybe she was just in an awkward period after beginning to lose her ingénue looks but not yet acquiring the acting chops that gave her a second wind beginning with "A Turning Point" in 1977. Too often, she makes cute pouts at the camera, like when she sneaks a puff of Hogan's cheroot, as if winking at the viewer.

The script serves up a series of crises that are rendered flat, inert, and often ludicrous on-screen. Hogan and Sara escape French pursuers when she shakes a dead rattlesnake, scaring them off. It sounds clever on paper, but looks weak on film. Another scene, a face-off between the pair and some Yanqui Indians, ends with the Indians riding off like scared ninnies when flashed by Sara's crucifix.

Another scene has the pair arrive at a cantina looking for Hogan's contact with some Mexican rebels. Hogan slips someone a code-phrase, the bartender doesn't understand what he means, Hogan asks who runs the place, the bartender says it is his father, now sick. Hogan and Sara visit the father, ask how to get in touch with the rebels. After some sickly faces, the father nods to his wife, who tells Hogan to see the candlemaker, who then leads him to the rebels. This all takes about 10 minutes, adding nothing to an already overlong movie.

SPOILER ALERT: The biggest twist in this film is also the most annoying. In short, it is when we discover, some 20 minutes before its end, that Sara is not a nun, but a prostitute. There's a frustrating pointlessness to this charade, and a big logic gap when one reflects on early scenes when she prays over the corpses of her would-be rapists and seems very knowledgeable of canon law. The obvious fact is the movie would have been better off leaving Sara a real nun, but instead it wants to end the movie with the leads in a sexy clinch. Problem is, among couples of the period, Eastwood and MacLaine generate less romantic chemistry than did Nixon and Agnew.
23 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
One of Eastwood's best westerns
tieman6427 February 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Clint Eastwood plays another wandering loner in Don Siegel's "Two Mules For Sister Sara". Here he's a mercenary who has been hired by Mexican soldiers to rob a French garrison. On his way there he meets a nun (Shirley MacLaine) who claims to know the layout of the fortress. Recognising that her inside information may prove useful, the duo strike up a deal, mount their mules and head off on a little adventure.

Much of the film's delights are had by simply observing the interactions between Clint and MacLaine. Unlike your typical nun, she's a vulgar oaf who surprises Clint with her crude behaviour. The film tries to tackle some light themes – the nun's religious devotion contrasted with Clint's mercenary self-centredness, Clint's self-control (he wants to make love to her but can't because he respects her faith) contrasted with the nun's immorality (she's not a nun but a whore in disguise) - but mostly it plays things for easy jokes and comic book violence. Which is fine. Clint looks cool doing anything.

The tobacco chewing, poncho wearing super-star spends most of the second half of the film vomiting one-liners, lighting dynamite with his cigar and gunning down French soldiers with the kind of super-cool casualness that made him famous. Unfazed and nonchalant, he's in total control. Guy's love this tough-loner archetype, of course, it's the reason everyone from Keanue Reeves to Arnold Swarzenegger has a career. But with his permanent frown, gravely voice and quiet intelligence, Clint is more next-generation Bogart than macho action hero.

Beyond all this, Don Siegel's direction is excellent. An attack on a huge fort is especially thrilling and the film's final shot is hilarious. Rounding things off is Ennio Morricone's score, which is every bit as precious as his more well known tracks.

8/10 - Siegel made a cluster of excellent films. "Charley Varrick", "Escape from Alcatraz", "Telefon", "Hell is for Heroes", "Riot in Cell Block 11", "Two Mules For Sister Sara", "The Shootist", "The Killers", "Coogans Bluff" and "The Verdict" have all aged surprisingly well, though few of his films reach the heights of "The Beguiled".

Worth one viewing.
12 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Odd Couple Western/Romance.
AaronCapenBanner6 September 2013
Clint Eastwood stars as a mercenary named Hogan, who rescues a nun being attacked by three cowboys. After dispatching them, Hogan finds to his consternation that he can't get rid of the grateful nun Sara(Shirley MacLaine), though he discovers that she has information regarding a French fort he is doing reconnaissance on. He also learns that this nun has secrets of her own...

Reasonably entertaining film has some good action and comedy, though also some graphic violence in the climatic battle at the French fort, and an entirely predictable outcome of their romance. Marred by glaring changes of tone, but still passable.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Should Have Been Better.
screenman2 May 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Don Siegel wanders into spaghetti-western territory, and comes up with this rather flatulent offering.

Clint Eastwood plays his time-honoured itinerant mercenary role, though here Siegel imbues him with a name and a character, but very little else. Shirley Mclaine plays the role of a prostitute masquerading as a nun in a squabble between Mexican freedom-fighters and French colonialists. They two effectively prop the whole thing up. Considering the potential for misunderstandings and double-entendres between a gunfighter and a whore in disguise, very little in the way of irony or comic complexity seems to arise. Mr Siegel should have watched a few 'Carry On' movies. This was supposed to be a comedy after all. Otherwise it's a feeble, routine replica of the hokum that Sergio Leone did so well. Even the soundtrack and incidental music has a distinctly Morricone stamp.

It's entertaining. But it's patchy, needlessly long, and misses out on any number of great gags, situation comedy, or moments of ironic discovery. Not a patch on the 'Dollars' trilogy, 'Once Upon a Time', or 'Fistful'.

Don't wait up.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A different western journey
KineticSeoul9 January 2012
I was hesitant on watching this western although it has Clint in it because it just seemed really boring. Even the title seemed really boring like it's a movie about ranching. But surprisingly the movie starts out with a bang from the start. Clint plays a gunslinger once again but this time he is traveling with a nun. Which is interesting since it's a man that uses violence constantly to solve his problems and is with a nun who tries to go in a more peaceful direction and forgives those that wrong her. Although her naive and lazy manner gets annoying after a while. For a western that is overlooked it's actually a engaging western that is worth seeing. This isn't a western that has a bunch of stand offs and shootouts. Although it lacks the gritty western elements but backs it up with the intriguing combination of force and peace to make it through the journey. This is not a western that I am used to but it's still a good western journey that doesn't try too hard. The movie does have decent moments but sometimes the movie just seemed a bit dull and not all that entertaining. Overall despite some slow points this is a western that is well worth watching although it isn't for everyone that is into this genre.

6.7/10
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
What a good movie!
fleecy27 September 1998
It was a different kind of western with a surprising ending. Clint Eastwood and Shirley McClaine had great chemistry and gave great performances; especially Clint Eastwood. It was fun to watch with a good story line. Very entertaining!
36 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
An odd couple in a western movie
noodles-133 April 2007
This movie has been done due to a request of Clint Eastwood, who wanted a more brilliant role in order to show his acting capabilities, after his well known action and spaghetti western movies. He teamed up with a director of his trust, Don Siegel, who is not known for his skills in directing comedies. Further, Clint and Shirley MacLaine apparently did not match. So what came out of their effort? An "odd couple" movie that mixes action, war, western, comedy and some romance. Siegel is comfortable with action and you can see it when action comes to the screen. The rest does not really work. The script is not so funny, the different parts do not make a movie. Moreover, the western part is a quote from Sergio Leone, with its mix of venturers, Mexican revolution, etc. Anyway, I rated it 7 because I love Clint Eastwood and he is good in his role.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Another Great Western Film
Rainey-Dawn20 October 2014
I am not a fan of Western films - generally speaking - but Two Mules for Sister Sara is a outstanding story. This movie really did get my attention from the beginning and held it until the very end. It is not a typical shot-them-up Western flick - yet it does have some gun-slinging action in it.

This is one of those films I do not want to talk about too much because I don't want to give it away - instead I will tell you to simply watch it because it is good! I can say it is a very interesting concept: The gunslinger helping a nun and vice versa - just watch the film and see how they meet and it plays out you will not be disappointed.

9/10
16 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
MacLaine's great!
nelsonhodgie2 June 2020
Clint is Clint. But this is really Shirley MacLaine's movie. She is terrific in the role of Sister Sara. At times funny, stern, sexy, pious. It's a real star turn. And I'm not even a fan of hers. In many ways this is an American Spaghetti Western. Enno Morricone did the score. Mexico substitutes for Spain and Clint is at his sharp shooting best. Very enjoyable.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Terrific film
jspratjr316 June 2003
I love Clint westerns and Two Mules For Sister Sara is no exception. Clint is Clint and Shirley MacLaine is perfect for her role as "Sister Sara". The developing chemistry between Eastwood and MacLaine is fun to watch and the score outstanding. As usual, Clint has some classic one-liners. I've watched this DVD 5 times and have yet to be bored.
17 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A bummer.
gridoon27 December 1999
Well, Eastwood's rich career has its low points, too, and this 1970 bummer certainly qualifies as one of those. It's a dull and disappointing Western. The main problem is the thoroughly uninvolving story - so uninvolving, in fact, that it makes you wonder why exactly the filmmakers chose to tell it and if they thought it had any interest whatsoever. Eastwood himself is OK and occasionally enjoyable, but MacLaine is horribly miscast.
14 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Which of my mules you laughin' at NOW?
rmax30482319 September 2011
Warning: Spoilers
An imitation spaghetti Western directed by Don Siegel, written by Budd Boettiger, with music by Ennio Morricone, starring Clint Eastwood (he's the guy with the little cigar and the poncho) and Shirley MacLaine as a fake nun.

Well, they all know their business so it should be pretty good and, in fact, it's not terrible. Eastwood, of course, could have walked through the picture. The nearest he comes to a smile is a kind of pained grimace but that's all required of him -- that and lighting a stick of dynamite with that cigar and an expression of complete removal from the situation.

I don't know exactly what Shirley MacLaine is doing in this. One thinks of her neither as a nun nor as a female figure to be batted around by a seedy hero like Eastwood, let alone the grease balls against whom they're fighting.

Two good scenes stand out. In one, Eastwood's shoulder is pierced by an Indian arrow and MacLaine must remove it by the most painful process imaginable. Eastwood actually gets to register pain for once.

Scene two. What with that injured shoulder, Eastwood can hardly be expected to climb the trestle that carries the railroad tracks across the gorge so that dynamite can be planted and the bridge destroyed at the moment the train is crossing it. MacLaine must do it. It would be easier if she just climbed the hill, walked out on the rickety bridge, and tucked the dynamite away underneath the rails but not nearly so dramatic. Or so amusing when Eastwood, using only one arm and while drunk, must try to balance the rifle on MacLaine's shoulder and try to hit and explode the dynamite.

Morricone's goofy musical score tells us that he, at least, recognized this movie for the joke it was.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed