Tiger by the Tail (1970) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
One for Skip Homeier fans!
JohnHowardReid22 September 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Producer: Francis D. Lyon. Executive producer: Earle Lyon. Photographed in Eastman Color.

Not copyright by United Pictures. U.S. release through Commonwealth United Entertainment and American International Pictures: January 1970. No recorded New York opening. 99 minutes.

SYNOPSIS: Racetrack proprietor is murdered during a robbery. His estranged brother comes under suspicion.

NOTES: Final film of Glenda Farrell.

COMMENT: One of Hollywood's finest actresses, Glenda Farrell (Torchy Blane herself), won no awards. In fact, to my knowledge, she wasn't even nominated. In the 1960s, like so many of the industry's golden age figures, she could find work only in independent productions like this mildly suspenseful "Tiger by the Tail" (made in 1968). Mind you, her character isn't badly conceived, and she gives a good performance. As indeed do other veterans in the cast, led by Dean Jagger, John Dehner and Alan Hale (although it's Skip Homeier who walks away with the acting honors). Director Springsteen seems more comfortable with actors of this caliber. When they're on screen, the film becomes mildly interesting.

On the other hand, when people like George, Hedren and Charo dominate the action, the director is merely content to plod back and forth from boring close-up to boring close-up, TV style. Most of this material should have been left on the cutting-room floor. Fortunately, the action spots, helped by real location lensing, come across with a bit more zing.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Tigers, lions, panthers
AAdaSC21 February 2017
Polar bears, rhinos, elephants. It doesn't matter which animal you choose, this title makes no sense. This looks like a TV movie and I was surprised to find that it isn't. The story centres around a racecourse and some missing money and unfortunately, it's pretty boring. There is nothing too convincing about any of it especially when Christopher George (Steve) starts throwing around Alan Hale Jr (Whitehorn). I don't think so!

Badger by the belly, cat by the coccyx, hippo by the hairline…..like I said, this film is boring so there's nothing much to say about it. Why not spend time making up alternate titles for it? Remember that the title must bear absolutely no relevance to the film and keep to the animal theme.
3 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A western specialist's swan song
searchanddestroy-119 October 2022
Yes folks, that's the last film of RG Springsteen. A film director specialized in westerns, and that's even more surprising to see that his last film is a crime drama. As John Sturges, two films before his retirement, gave us MC Q, a crime movie starring John Wayne impersonating Dirty Harry. This RG Springstee's film looks like a TV movie and is worth watching only because of its scarcity. Chris George is bland as usual but that's not a real problem for such a film. It is agreeable for early seventies gem diggers as me. The scheme is used, overused, so don't expect any surprise. Except maybe the horserace track heist, which will never make you forget Stan Kubrick's THE KILLING heist, but which is enjoyable to watch though.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Loved it, but I admit bias
rav_vale16 November 2023
Upfront, I confess I am biased in writing this review. What are my biases?

For one thing, I am a Christopher George fan. I think he is underrated as an actor, as I find many so-called good-looking actors often are.

For another thing, I am a huge director RG Springsteen fan and this was his final movie. And I think he does a fine job here.

Having gotten that out-of-the-way, let me get to my rating and my review:

I would actually probably rate this as a solid nine or maybe 9.5. But I have to round up my rating, because I feel it doesn't get a fair enough average.

I thought the writing was really good. And if this movie had been done in black-and-white, and either in the 40s or 50s, it would probably now be considered at least in the upper tier of film noir.

Sure, it has a few "television movie" qualities to it. But I still found it cinematic enough project it on my wall to be some thing I would watch again and again. I thought it had a good mystery, yet played fair with the viewer. I did guess the solution, but not until about halfway through. And I wasn't sure until the very ending.

All the Performances were great, by a stellar cast. I have to admit, I was surprised by Charo's performance, which was far better than I expected. I thought she really did a great job for such a small part.

I would recommend this movie for anybody who likes film noir, mystery, a few good action scenes, great performances by iconic actors, some interesting settings, cinematography, and music score.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
AFI should have made it #1
paladin-1123 September 2001
Sometimes you have to wonder why some films are snubbed at the Oscars, and Tiger by the Tail is one of those films.

Afterall, Charo is in it. Any film about a guy being framed for murder is obviously top notch. Why is there no Maltin review?
14 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed