Juliet of the Spirits (1965) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
90 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Unique to the medium
CitizenDain6 April 2005
This film by Fellini is basically the female version of 8 1/2. Instead of delving into the mind of a middle-aged Italian man dealing with problems with his wife and trying to figure out who he really is, it is about a middle-aged Italian woman dealing with problems with her cheating husband and trying to figure out who she really is. (I still can't decide who I like more as a lead in a Fellini film... Masina or Mastroianni.) The film is very enjoyable, and is definitely one of the films I would classify as a work of art. The one thing that really stands out to me, however, is this: It could only exist as a film. Most films are adapted from previously written novels, or at the very least can suffer the indignation of a "novelization" without losing the quality of the story. But I cannot fathom any way a writer could capture this film with words. It is very visual, but could not be painted or drawn either. I think this is one of the few films I've seen that is completely unique to the medium of film. Towards the end of the film, there is a scene where she is trying to avoid voices and images around her while hosting a party. It was at this point that I realized how perfectly every shot was set-up, and that there would be no way anyone could capture the feeling or the images with words.

I would be extremely fascinated to see what the shooting script to this film looked like. It's the fifth Fellini film I've seen, and I must say, I think I can call him my favorite director. He's the only director whom I've been enthralled by every single film I've seen of his. He has a perfect record, 1.000% batting average so far with me. I'm going to keep seeing more, and hopefully I won't ever be disappointed.
48 out of 58 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
An Apologia to Giulietta
davidmvining31 December 2020
This was born from a place of pain, but not Federico Fellini's pain. Made as a present to his wife, Giulietta Masina, Juliet of the Spirits is the Technicolor parade of the grotesque dramatization of Giulietta's life dealing with the perennially unfaithful Italian director. You see, she loved Federico, loved him dearly, but his infidelity hurt her. And it's obvious. There are events in this movie based on their relationship, and, according to what I've read, it was all very difficult for Giulietta to get through the filming experience, causing further strain on their relationship.

The film Giulietta is the doting housewife to a successful businessman who never seems to be at home. As the movie begins, she's eagerly preparing for a quiet evening celebration of their fifteenth wedding anniversary, but he comes home with a cadre of friends, openly admitting that he's forgotten their anniversary, and proceeds to let the people run rampant through the house, eventually turning it into a séance. It's here that we get our first hearing of a spirit, calling itself Iris, who talks to Giulietta intermittently throughout the story.

The story is that Giulietta's husband says another woman's name in his sleep, and Giulietta can't let it go because it suddenly makes much of his past behavior, like constantly working late, just make sense. Everyone tells her this or that, but everyone has their own agenda and no one seems willing to actually take Giulietta and what she wants into consideration. Her family dismisses her. The weird hermaphroditic guru tells her to become a sex object. The attractive neighbor woman tries to turn Giulietta into a prostitute in all but name. They're all pushing her away from her husband, but Giulietta never wanted to lose her husband, she wanted him to be who she fell in love with.

She hires a private investigator (something that the real Giulietta did to Federico) to follow her husband around where she discovers that the whispered "Gabriella" is, in fact, a real woman, a model that Giorgio met in his work and now professes he loves in private. The investigators keeps saying that all will be well, that everything can be fixed and made right, but Giulietta barely acknowledges their assurances, knowing the break has occurred.

In many ways, this feels like a prequel to 8 1/2. It's not, mind you, but the characters of Giulietta and Giorgio are very similar to the characters of Luisa and Guido in the earlier film, but earlier in time. The pain for Giulietta is new while for Luisa it was old and malignant. Giorgio still lies about his affairs where Guido is open about his infidelities. Still, Giorgio is no film director. However, the follow up of Juliet of the Spirits from 8 1/2, both stories of infidelity, the first centered on the guilty male and the second on the innocent female, cannot be by accident. The incredibly prevalent use of fantasy and memory, often intertwined with no indication of where one begins and the other ends, is present in both, and the second feels like an extension of the first. It's not just that Fellini was continuing with a new style of storytelling for his films, it's that the one feels like the flip side of the other.

In both, the fantasies represent that which either draw or repel the respective characters. Guido was trying to create his harem in his head, but it fell apart. For Giulietta, though, her fantasies are nightmares. The final ten minutes do a similar thing to the harem scene in 8 1/2 where everything that has been consuming her comes to a single place, but it's tied into actual physical actions on her part. Giorgio has gone to vacation with Gabriella in Milan, unapologetically but still with a lie, and Giulietta tries to simply go to bed, but the visions of the decrepit bodies leftover from orgies, dead horses, her grandfather who ran away with a young dancer when he was an old man, the distinctive basket that Giulietta's neighbor set up to go into a pleasure treehouse in her unique getup, and Giulietta's younger self all begin filling the empty spaces of her house around her. As she calmly moves through the images, she gains control of what she wants, her younger self as she was in a school production of a martyr's martyrdom where she was burned alive on a rack. Giulietta frees her younger self from the rack and walks away.

Now, Masina and Fellini disagreed with the ending of the film. Fellini saw it as a happy and hopeful ending because Giulietta walking away from the house meant that she was free of the chains that had bound her, but Masina saw it from a much sadder point of view where Giulietta had lost everything and had nothing. Her friends were vapid and unhelpful. The grotesqueries of the other life her neighbor had tried to push her into were distasteful to her. Her husband was gone, and all she had was herself. Her whole life had been a waste. She has no children to take from it. She's been cast out with nothing at all. I think the truth of the ending contains both elements. Giulietta is free from the unloving relationship with her husband, but she also no longer has any support. All that she had believed in failed her, so yes, she can go out and start anew, but she's in her 40s and has been a housewife for fifteen years. Her prospects are probably not great, and on top of that, she doesn't even have a moral base on which to operate because everything she thought was right has been thrown into turmoil.

As Fellini's first foray into feature length color filmmaking, the movie is a joy to look at from beginning to end. He uses colors extensively and specifically all at once. In particular, the color of Giulietta's clothes indicate what he's trying to do in every scene. She often wears white in the beginning, indicating her purity and innocence. When she visits the guru, she wears a green coat that covers a red dress, indicating a safe exterior with a wild interior waiting to come out. When she visits her neighbor's fiancé, a rich Arab, during a party, she wears a bright red dress as though she's ready to partake in the grotesqueries. At the end, she wears a white nightgown indicating that she's rejecting it all and has nothing. However, the colors go beyond that. Her neighbor is often associated with yellow, which is a corrupted form of white and indicates impurity, for instance. The colors are there, they are wonderful to look at, and they all help imbue the proceedings with further meaning.

The movie is rich and dense, firmly fitting into Fellini's new moves stylistically. Embracing color, fantasy, memory, and affectation, Fellini paints a painful portrait of his wife's pain that he doesn't quite seem to understand but is compelling nonetheless. This may not be one of his greatest films, but it does show that his Felliniesque later films can contain worth anyway.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Nine; or, Fellini's Other Half
Cineanalyst20 August 2020
"Juliet of the Spirits" is one way, I suppose, to make a dissatisfied bourgeois housewife's life look intriguing--a colorized "8 1/2" (1963) for writer-director Federico Fellini's actress-wife, Giulietta Masina. Most of this one involves her concern over her husband's philandering, but there's also her childhood memory--apparently, a traumatic event of some sort--of playing the central role of the martyr in a Catholic-school play. Plus, there's the circus of fashion and sex in the world of modeling and other carnivalesque endeavors that seems to surround her through her husband's work and that of her other family members, friends and neighbors. Much of this bombards her as surreal visual and audible hallucinations. I don't care to get into the Freudian or Jungian analysis of her problems, though. That nonsense is quite dull--like a lazy housewife dozing off while sunbathing on a beach. Kudos to Fellini, though, for making it look a sumptuous spectacle.

Instead of the director double standing in for Fellini in "8 1/2," who faces a creative crisis, the housewife here traces her marital trap back to the stage of her religious performance. Eventually, the promise of her salvation involves rescuing that childhood memory. This also seems to be the key, slight as it may be, to suggestions that "Juliet of the Spirits" alludes to Lewis Carroll's Alice books. I've been seeking a bunch of films inspired by that children's literature since reading them, and I came to this after reviewing Woody Allen's "Alice" (1990), which is said to be a reworking of this Fellini film, which also seems to be a slight connection to me having now viewed both, but I digress. If there is some of Carroll's Alice in Fellini's Giulietta, it's in their shared repressed childhood. Of course, the Alice books predate Freud and Surrealism and are nonsense rather than analytical, but they likewise parody their protagonist's outer reality within the dreamworld. That includes nursery rhymes and other prior children's literature. Likewise, "Juliet of the Spirits" ends up parodying film by turning it into a mode for surveillance of the husband's dalliances, or as a source of mockery via television.

Besides, akin to Wonderland, taking place along beaches, gardens and forests, note, too, how this film begins and ends visually. Within the first scene, there is a virtuoso shot through a series of looking glasses--announcing a mirror motif that continues to some extent throughout the picture. And, the ending includes the opening of a small door, so that Giulietta may finally enter the tunnel she's heretofore repeatedly shunned--especially as offered by her Caterpillar of a neighbor, who sports a butterfly tattoo (not as explicit as the White Rabbit ink in "The Matrix" (1990), but still...) and tries to show Giulietta who she may become. Although, with all the ridiculous head gear here, there really ought to be a Mad Hatter about; after all, it was a cat, like the Cheshire one with Alice, that led Giulietta to her neighbor's mad Champagne party (hey, they're Italian--not English). Moreover, the neighbor guides her quite vividly, what with the sex mirror on the ceiling, all of the deflowering going about alongside her flower-covered staircase, and the vaginal-like openings, through a pool slide and a hole to a platform in the trees (where, presumably, more sex is to occur). It's this Wonderland nonsense that's lustrous.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Technicolor Psyche of a Woman at a Loss for Love
cineaste-415 May 2000
I was 15 years old when I stumbled into a cinema and caught my first Fellini film -- Juliet of the Spirits. I was so jazzed, wowed and bedazzled by it, I'm sure I went back a few more times. It led me to other Fellini films and, since, he's become my favorite film director.

Though at age 15, I shouldn't have been able to relate very well with this story of an Italian middle-aged woman and her crumbling psyche (what with her failing marriage, her unsympathetic relatives and her repressive childhood), the movie made me care about this woman and showed me sights on film that I'd never seen before.

Masina (Fellini's wife), in her performance, has nearly everything to do with making Juliet's story meaningful, even to a teenaged boy in California. The character's thoughts flash, unspoken, across her face. Her fear, her

bemusement, her insecurities--all are writ in italics and I had no trouble empathizing with Juliet.

Fellini, though, makes the film an occasion to witness how far the medium can go in bringing alive a person's inner life. The weird and awful power of (subjective) memory, the dream state, the spectres of loneliness, betrayal and Catholic mythology: all these and more overtake the screen, dominate the imagery and play the antagonists to Juliet who, as seen by the other "real" characters in the story, is just a simple, loving housewife and neighbor. Juliet finally has to face her demons and either vanquish them or go mad. By the end of the film, we know most of her demons, where they came from, whom they represent and what they mean. What an accomplishment!

In a clinical setting, Fellini dropped LSD around the time he concocted this film. That may be one reason the movie is so psychedelic. This also was his first feature in color. The music is unforgettable. Costumes should have won the Oscar, but that honor went to "Man for all Seasons".

Incidentally, I've bought and viewed the DVD of this movie. It's quite washed-out and not as good as an available VHS letterboxed version.

I'll always miss Fellini, but am so grateful that he was able to make this film and over a dozen others.
58 out of 67 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Fellini's deepest dreams
Dr.Mike17 January 2000
Juliet of the Spirits has become one of my favorite Fellini films. The story involves a woman who discovers that her husband is cheating on her. The forces of family, tradition, the church, and an immoral society all pull at her and force her to make a difficult decision. These forces would be banal in a standard film but Fellini chooses to visualize them as images and dreams. The dream sequences are nearly perfect and create a sharp sense of the hazy logic and unreality of dreams. Other comments (as well as our friend Maltin) have noted that the symbolic nature of the film is a detriment. This is true only if you are constrained by reality and demand that film adhere to the rules you have set down (or more likely had set down for you). Taking the journey with this film is well worth the time and effort. I hesitate to state that a male director has successfully penetrated the inner desires of a woman, but in this case I think Fellini has at least come close to the mark. A film to be looked at, talked about, and enjoyed again and again.
53 out of 63 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
35mm restoration, brilliant in color and Fellini style.
mramsay9 August 2001
This is the first Fellini movie I ever saw and I just recently viewed the 35mm restored re-release. How beautiful. Fellini captures such wonderful dream-like sequences in brilliant color. Phenomenal! Every scene had such a distinct personality and mood to it. His blend of high and low key lighting, especially in the exposition carries the storyline. Giulietta's associated score is disturbing yet intriguing. The wardrobe and makeup department must have had lots of fun on this film. If you have yet to see a Fellini movie, I suggest this one. A bit creepy, a bit weird, but nonetheless it has a purpose. A tight narrative.
19 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Strange, symbolic, and surreal but ultimately unfulfilling
jamesrupert201415 June 2020
Juliet, a plain (relatively speaking) woman (Giulietta Masina) finds the will to leave her philandering husband through strange visions and the weird sybaritic lifestyle of her neighbour Suzy (Sandra Milo). As much as I like Giulietta Masina, I didn't like this film as much the earlier neo-realist work she did with husband Federico Fellini, such as the superb 'La Strada' (1954). I am not a big fan of the flamboyant grotesqueries in which Fellini indulged himself in the 60s (although there are some striking images (both in dreams and in reality) in this film such as the parade on the beach or the strange recurring row of nuns). As usual, Masina, with her beautifully expressive face, is irresistible and although I didn't really like the film, I am glad I watched it.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Fellini at his dazzling, colorful peak!
Feanor_Nordol7 February 2004
Fellini casts his real-life wife, Guilietta Masina, as Guilietta - an upper middle class housewife whose life is coming apart. The film's plot serves a vehicle for some of the most dazzling, psychedelic scenes ever put on film, all before anyone used computer graphics to make cinema more fantastic. Fellini uses costumes, makeup and, most of all casting of supporting actors and extras, to achieve his surrealism.

His first film is color, this is Fellini's most Felliniesque movie.
49 out of 63 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Ambiguous, emotional, biographical, childish, erotic fantasy within a psyche
marcin_kukuczka10 February 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Fellini, after his two 1960s famous productions, LA DOLCE VITA and 8 1/2, made GIULIETTA DEGLI SPIRITI (1965), not only his first color film but a unique surreal work at various levels of analysis. While the two earlier movies dealt with the psyche of the male characters portrayed by Marcello Mastroianni, this movie deals with the psyche of a middle aged wealthy woman portrayed by Giulietta Masina, not only an actress - someone much more important: Fellini's wife who was at his side throughout his career. Yet, this is the film where Fellini becomes pretty vague, psychedelic towards viewers, but, at the same time, very friendly and sympathetic towards Giulietta. When I saw this film as a 17 year-old youngster, I did not like it. Now, however, when I see it again after 12 years, it appears much more artistic and clearer to me.

This is a sort of film that real connoisseurs of art will find ambiguous. Its entire content as well as its core idea have been, for all these 42 years, a true mystery: why the odd experience of the main character's mind affects us so powerfully, so magically? Fellini does not give final answers, he never does in his movies, he never forces us to like him - he invites us for the journey to the psyche. He introduces to us a profound insight into the very peripheries of a mind of the main character. Giulietta (Giulietta Masina) copes with a problem: her husband Giorgio (Mario Pisu) has a mistress. Some advise her to be a temple of love for her husband, some tell her to relax and ignore that, some prompt her to make more weird fun of life, to let out desires: these are the spirits who visit her, the spirits of her past and, supposedly, her presence. The transfers from reality are sometimes fluent, yet sometimes vague. We see various images derived from Giulietta's imagination where Fellini becomes very erotic like in his later work SATYRICON and uniquely egocentric like in no other of his movies. He claimed to have taken LSD before filming some scenes and therefore, the movie is at times extremely weird and pretty terrifying.

Because of its purely Felliniesque nature characterized as blending reality and fantasy, GIULIETTA DEGLI SPIRITI is not for everyone. It's, similarly to 8 1/2, rather a PSYCHOLOGY than LINEAR CONTENT and STORY. There are flashbacks, there are dreams, there are, foremost, fantasies. Moreover, this is yet another time Fellini has manifested his opinion about an individual within a decadent society. He seems to criticize social situations, its noise that looks for rest in magic and sensation. Meanwhile, he identifies with the characters, he understands them. It's at the same time, a biographical movie where, again, Fellini attempts at addressing the conscience of forgiveness to the female character in a marriage. Therefore, such short comments will never discuss the movie justly because it has to be deeply analyzed.

All those are resembled in many beautifully photographed scenes. For instance, I'll never forget the first 40 minutes of the film when we have a clear presentation of the characters and events of everyday life that have a serious impact on Giulietta's psyche. She is preparing a romantic party on the wedding anniversary; yet, her husband invites many noisy people to their house: various people, all bored with their wealth looking for more ecstasies. She does not show anger nor dissatisfaction and says to herself in the mirror: "At least don't be led to crying!" In Giulietta's house, they organize a meeting where they call spirits who post messages: "love for all" or "harlot" addressed to one lady whose aim in life is to sculpt, cook and make love. There is also a message for Giulietta: "Poor child, no one cares for you!" From this moment, Giulietta feels lost. She takes the words seriously and this leads her to a series of mental states that bring her to the very edge of hope, the very peripheries of mind; yet finally to a beautiful catharsis. Here, I would mention the character of Jose (Jose Luis De Villalonga), Giorgio's friend who offers Giulietta the drink, Sangria, and who gives her a beautiful advice about simplicity and water.

The performances are brilliant. Giulietta Masina does something really extraordinary in this movie. It is the third Fellini's movie after LA STRADA and NIGHTS OF CABIRIA where she was cast in the lead and here, we clearly see a mature woman absorbed by the naiveness of a child. She partly reflects Gelsomina and partly Cabiria; yet, Giulietta is neither the LA STRADA nor NIGHTS OF CABIRIA character: she is unique. In my opinion, Masina's Giulietta is one of the very best female roles in the history of cinema. Other great cast are Valentina Cortese as magic-absorbed Valentina, Sandra Milo as sensual woman of fantasies Suzy, Mario Pisu as the unfaithful husband and Lou Gilbert as the grandfather.

There is, however, a harmful aspect of the movie, too. What I mean by "harmful" is that the whole story does not have a more profound development of the consequence, a "moral" that always makes art more "ordered" and "available" for human mind and thought. Creativeness of order leads to harmony of art and Fellini ignores that in the movie. There is a cry for the reference to the sublime self assessment of human mind and actions. Why does Giulietta regain hope? What is the gist of those spirits in a life? What is the power of her psyche? Such questions may appear after seeing the film and may leave a viewer confused at times.

All in all, this is an important movie, a truly Felliniesque one. Although it is not my favorite work of the director, GIULIETTA DEGLI SPIRITI is, undeniably, a work of art thanks to its uniqueness, its performances, photography and direction.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A very sensitive Fellini masterpiece
giorgialosavio22 November 2005
Warning: Spoilers
I can never get too tired of seeing Fellini. Over and over again. When I bought this film I was very anxious about it, but I had sub-estimated the film in my imagination. When I actually saw it, I was awed, amazed, in love. Giulietta Masina is a genius, a real actress. Even though this time she doesn't act in her brilliant clownesc style, she is as convincing and loving as she always is. The colours are brilliant, even more so for a film done in 1965 (and much better than the colours used in later works such as Casanova). The film is full of hidden hints so the attentive eye can understand the story more in depth. Fellini is a master on putting things in a very metaphorical way, and here he achieves to better himself even more. The clothing is fantastic and ageless. The flowers flowing from all the other female character's clothes contrast with the linear and simple ones from Giulietta, showing how introspective she is in her life, specially in her sexual one. The film is very Fellini, but very feminine in the other side, something rare until then. Even though women played a central part in most of his films, they were always seen through other men's eyes. This time the whole world is seen through Giulietta and her feminine repressions, caused by the typical Fellini factors - education, the church, family and of course Italy. Fellini might be good for those who love cinema, but for those who love it and understand what being an Italian conveys, it is a wonderful delight. Nothing better than a Fellinesc big southern woman, or an outrageously funny Ruma'...
21 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Possibly a bit much
Jeremy_Urquhart20 May 2023
This is quite possibly the Felliniest of all the Fellini films.

This is a good thing to a point, but I gotta be honest - it really started to wear me out eventually.

The plot here revolves around a middle-aged couple who don't have the best relationship - the husband consistently cheats and lies, and the wife feels intimidated and stuck in the marriage. She has something of a spiritual awakening, however, thanks to mysticism or something (I don't know what to call it - but I kind of hate that stuff and find it hard to buy into, even in a fictional movie), and the film follows her as she works up the courage to leave her husband. It plays out over nearly 2.5 hours. A good deal of it is spent on Fellini doing crazy stuff with sets, costumes, and camera angles in a way that feels distinctly Fellini, and many of these sequences are (I think intentionally) disorientating and sometimes unsettling.

It's all stuff I can kind of appreciate, and I think there's some interesting stuff going on thematically, seeing as Fellini cast his real-life wife in the lead role in a movie about a very bad marriage. If you're in the mood for something like this, it's probably easier to enjoy, rather than just distantly appreciate. But I was only up for like, 90-100 minutes of this; I wasn't really on board by the end. It was just a bit much, and not in a good way, like how La Dolce Vita feels like too much (there, the too-muchness feels purposeful).
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
There are movies and there is Fellini!
vdg15 February 2004
No spoilers here, just a simple feeling that I have every time I see a FELINNI movie: "There are movies and there is Fellini" This is an art film, as most of Fellini's movies, so I wont try to explain or comment anything on it, everybody has to have his own vision about the movie. Don't try to explain everything, don't try to see flaws in the screenplay, just take it the way it is: a beautiful fantasy. YES, it is very pretentious, if you don't like it or if you don't understand it that means this movies want not meant for you, but for the rest of us! The Criterion version of this movie is pure perfection, even though the 1 channel sound is not enough to get the full experience of this masterpiece. You'll love it or you'll hate it, there is nothing between!
28 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Solid
Cosmoeticadotcom13 September 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Federico Fellini's first color film, 1965's Juliet Of The Spirits (Giulietta Degli Spiriti), which was written by Fellini and longtime collaborators Tullio Pinelli, Ennio Flaiano, and Brunello Rondi, is, simply put, the female and color companion piece to 8½. Unlike that prior film, often considered Fellini's best, Juliet Of The Spirits was a critical and financial failure when it came out. The criticism of the film was too harsh for, while it is not as great nor good a film as some earlier Fellini classics, it is still Fellini, which makes it better than the overwhelming majority of films by others, for even when Fellini fails he succeeds at more things than most. However, like many of the first color films made by directors who started in black and white, Fellini seems to overdose on the new medium, with color schemes that seem off the charts, and which tend to bleed over into one another. However, given the oneiric quality of the film, this is not necessarily a bad thing, especially since this was at the start of 1960s psychadelia, and Fellini was supposedly affected by an LSD hit at the time.

Basically, Juliet Boldrini (Giulietta Masina- Fellini's real life wife) is a bored housewife who rightly suspects her wealthy public relations husband Giorgio (Mario Pisu) of infidelity, after their anniversary, when he mumbles another woman's name- Gabriella, a 24 year old model he's squiring around. Whereas the film, before this scene, was realist in the way that much of La Dolce Vita was, the seeds of doubt that are planted play havoc with Juliet's mind, and much of the rest of the film takes place entirely in Juliet's head. Even seemingly realistic scenes, such as when Juliet hires a detective agency to follow Giorgio and Gabriella, are tinged with psychodrama and images of repression, which make the viewer question if they are 'real' in the film's cosmos, or merely the fantasies of Juliet trying to nail her cheating husband. Aside from her faithless husband, Juliet has other people's idiocies to contend with- such as a neighbor, Suzy (Sandra Milo), who is an old nymphomaniac who may or may not hold orgies- this is never certain, for this may be a product of Juliet's imagination, in her palatial home. There is also her attraction to and influence by the occult- which stands in direct contravention to her character's beliefs in Nights Of Cabiria, where Cabiria mocks the believers in religion. Juliet also has a cold mother, a boorish sister, and repressed memories of a Roman Catholic childhood that have scarred her in some way- possibly involving sexual abuse from an older male relative, although this is also unclear since the symbolism of the scene that explicates this is not definitive, and is open to more than one interpretation. However, the implications of abuse seem clear, and the way Juliet reacts to sex throughout the film do seem, to a modern eye four decades down the pike, like a textbook case of post-traumatic stress disorder in reaction to sexual abuse…. Cinematographer Gianni di Venanzo seems to have been overwhelmed by the newness and use of color and spends too much of the film aping some of the distorted point of view shots that Ingmar Bergman's cinematographer Sven Nykvist perfected, only not as well as Nykvist. Even Nino Rota, Fellini's masterful musical composer, seems to be lost through most of this film where the film's visual images are often at emotional odds with Rota's score, which ranges from gorgeous classical music to atrocious jazz scats. Fortunately, despite her character's dourness, Masina again shines in this role, as she did in her earlier Fellini classics, La Strada (as Gelsomina) and Nights Of Cabiria (as Cabiria). Playing someone discomfited through the film is not an easy thing, yet never does the viewer think she is acting. While the screenplay may be overdone, Juliet's reactions to what is going about her are perfectly consistent with how a normal person would react to such bizarreness. This is quite a bit more than one can say with Woody Allen's dull re-imagining of this film, a quarter century later, with Mia Farrow as the titular Alice.

While Juliet Of The Spirits is not a masterpiece like Nights Of Cabiria nor La Dolce Vita, it is not a failure, and holds up much better than the similarly themed Robert Altman film from 1977, Three Women, where we get the mental breakdown of a single woman who fantasizes herself into the lives of two other women. Juliet never goes that far, yet the film is never as resonant as Ingmar Bergman's more brilliant film from the same year, Persona, in showing the inside out destruction of a mind, for Juliet never gives in, even as she is being targeted, it seems, for destruction from the outside in; and while that might make her a more admirable character than the pair of women from Persona, it does not make for as compelling a film. Juliet Of The Spirits is therefore a good and interesting film, one that will likely reveal a few hidden depths upon rewatch, despite its flaws, but it is not one for the pantheon. However, as a failure, and from a master, it is still leagues above many of the jewels in the crowns of lesser filmmakers. This is something about Juliet Of The Spirits that is perfectly appropriate.
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
only for lovers of the Surreal and those who love everything from Fellini
planktonrules20 December 2005
I used to think I hated Fellini movies. This was thanks to some of his surreal movies of the 60s and early 70s. These are among his most famous and so I am wondering if I am some sort of Neanderthal because I am either indifferent to them or hate them (such as SATYRICON). However, in recent years I have seen several Fellini films I loved--such as Amarcord and Il Bidone among others.

The surreal aspects of 8 1/2 and LA DULCE VITA are present, but restrained. However, with follow-up films like JULIET OF THE SPIRITS and FELLINI SATYRICON, the movies just got more and more and more bizarre and self-indulgent. I suppose they were well-made technically, but I just disliked the VERY bizarre elements and found, for me, they just didn't have much of a payoff for watching them--plus after a while, they just seem overwhelming and tiresome. It was just weird with no apparent purpose. This is actually rather odd, because I really like paintings by Dali and Bosch. But viewing one of these Surrealist paintings is different than spending 90 plus minutes being bombarded with occasionally incoherent images as in these movies.

Juliet of the Spirits actually has very few "normal" moments, as it has a lot of the supernatural, weird imagery and symbolism starting about 10 minutes into the movie. According to IMDb, Fellini claimed to have taken LSD when making this movie. This is very easy to believe!

The weird images are indeed weird, but the "sexy" images and salacious aspects of the film seem very tame by today's standards. In other words, the characters in the movie talk A LOT about sex, but never seem to get around to having any! So, apart from a few random boobies thrown in towards the end, this is not an especially sexy movie about sex and desire.

It's very interesting that the lead in the movie is Fellini's wife, Giulietta Masina. This is because according to the DVD notes from Criterion, this story was a not far from life representation of the Fellini marriage--complete with infidelity by Federico and a strong love of mysticism and spiritualism by Messina. So, it's very hard to tell how much of this is a "tell all" about the Fellinis and how much is fiction.

It's also very interesting because I wonder if Fellini's casting of his wife might represent some sort of not-too-well repressed hostility on his part. For example, the team of Fellini (directing) and Giulietta Masina (leading lady) brought us Nights of Cabiria (where she played a prostitute), La Strada (where she was a waif who was beaten and verbally abused throughout the film) and Juliet of the Spirts (where she is a woman married to an unfaithful man). Even Dali's muse, Gala, was occasionally painted as the Virgin Mary among the thousands of paintings that featured her!

For those of you who love Fellini or have a very high tolerance for this sort of material, you may just love this film. However, the average viewer will most likely be bored by the film. It earned a 3 SOLELY for the beautiful color camera-work plus I threw in an extra point for Masina because I felt sorry for her.
37 out of 61 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Fantasy informing and transforming reality.
DAHLRUSSELL10 April 2007
One of Fellini's most accessible films (his use of color really helps), he once again plays reality against an active fantasy life... fantasies that combine memory, fears, fleeting desires and the way we imagine the lives of others. For me, one of the things that makes a film 10 star is that it provides something that only film can provide, and this is it; while the presentation is very theatrical, this quick intercutting of time/memory/mood can only be done in film.

While the overall message is a very conservative (pre/anti-feminist) one of it's day, Fellini DOES liberate a woman's fantasy life, and this is the essence of his leading "little woman." The predominant action of the film is in her imagination.

This was the day when middle/upper class Italian women did not work, and Masina represents the "good little woman." Rich enough to have servants, there was little to occupy her time or mind, other than similar friends who have veered to the outre and weird just to have something to do. Masina's character searches more internally, and her fantasies color her vision of the lives of others. (Note that her usual circle of friends are equated with a fantasy of death, and you'll be clued into her psyche as these begin.)

I think you have to have lived a bit to "get" Fillini - I didn't like his work when I was younger - I love this. Also note his use of color as "percieved color" not literal color and this is worth many viewings.

And finally, if you are a larger woman... nothing makes you feel so great about being a large woman as watching Fellini's glorious Amazons!
18 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
I AM your lover, I AM your zero, I AM the face in your dreams of glass
TheAnimalMother8 February 2010
A reincarnation of the Buddha is said to have described himself as being, "like the moon upon the water...a reflection. Think of me as your self." He said. Many ancient sages have spoke and been written of seeing The One, the holy God of eternity while looking, gazing, or meditating into a river or pond. For just as God separated the light from the darkness. Fellini too has created his own deep symbolic reflections of the Unfathomable One. Some say that this film, 'Giullietta degli spiriti' is the feminine partner of Federico's previous film 8 1/2. 'An Ode To No One', and 'An Ode To One'. Like two mirrors, the two films reflect the Eternal Lovers in Their breaking, and in Their embrace. Fellini's dialogue and metaphors show a great understanding of The Self, The Divine Marriage, The Sacred Mystery. Fellini is one of the few modern artists who greatly understood the purpose and very nature of art itself. All art imitates life, sure, but human life also is merely an interpretation of that which is truly real. It is obvious by Fellini's work that he himself created his art in order to become more real, to become closer to truth. He created in order to see with more depth and to share this with others. Fellini undoubtedly understood the logic in the seemingly illogical words of the great William Blake when he said "If the doors of perception were truly cleansed, everything would appear as it truly is - infinite.". Fellini understood that all art imitates life, but even more so, he understood that all art imitates the Divine. He also understood that only through this kind of conscious introspection can one become closer and closer to our own True Infinite Nature. People who do not follow spiritual disciplines, or who do not know the work of Carl Jung, or who do not have a good understanding of ancient sacred scripture, will likely miss much of the depth in this film. However that is not to say that those people still won't enjoy it. This is the work of a Divinely inspired genius. Some watch this film and are dazzled by the great colour and flamboyant spectacle of it (And why wouldn't you be?), however truly it is the interweaving of dialogue and relationships that speak even louder than the amazing visuals. "For those who have ears, let them hear!"

10/10
25 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8 1/2 In Drag
loganx-212 December 2007
Really sort of the female counter part to 8 1/2, It had the same sort of dream/memory/fantasy narrative, and the same sprawling dialogue and humor, the biggest difference was this was about relationships and sexual repression and freedom, had a female lead and was in technicolor, which Fellini really makes great use of, it adds a kelidoscopic psychedelic feel to the whole movie. There really are some amazing visuals and all the dialoge is superb. Though I guess its not so much a female 8 1/2 as it is a caricature of a marriage during the sexual revolution , but it's still a funny and poignant one. Great performances and memory dialog; the sexual revolution as a circus.
12 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Too long and frustrating
preppy-37 December 2007
Warning: Spoilers
A woman believes her husband may be cheating on her with a beautiful model. She hires a detective agency to find out for her. When she realizes the truth she agonizes over what her decision will be.

This is my first Fellini film. Considering I love movies and have seen almost 2000 of them that may seem strange...but it's true. The only Fellini I ever saw was the "Toby Dammit" sequence in "Spirits of the Dead". I HATED it. All images with precious little story. I didn't hate this one but I don't love it either.

The central story itself is interesting and the acting by the whole cast is good. Also Fellini shot in bright beautiful color. The cinematography is just incredible and some of the images are astonishing. However it reaches the point where the images overpower and dilute the main story. At first I liked them but then they started to get annoying. More than once I just wish Fellini had controlled himself and stopped throwing weird images and very strange characters at us. The movie drags out over two hours which is far too long. Also I found the main music score to be just dreadful--truly awful. I'm sure back in 1965 this wowed people but it doesn't hold up. Still I am interested in seeing more of Fellini's films. I can't say I loved this but it has me interested.
5 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Juliet is a Delight!
katrowellpa11 September 2006
I loved this movie. For me, as a relatively new student of Fellini, I understand that there is a progression in his films over the years. His initial films are more generally coherent stories like "La Strada" and then his later films are more focused on the visual and surreal, like "8 1/2".

This movie is somewhere in between. There is the coherent storyline of Juliet and her philandering husband and all the other strange characters in her life, like family and friends, but then there is also the psychedelic and surreal element of the spirit world that Juliet is in close contact with everyday.

Masina is great as usual--she acts a lot just with her eyes and the expressions on her face.

This film is just a delight. My suggestion is that you don't try to analyze it too deeply. Just sit back and let the colors, settings, costumes, and larger than life characters wash over you.
13 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Visually dazzling... Narratively lacking!
AhmedSpielberg997 October 2018
This is the first Fellini film I watch, and also it's the first time I found myself riveted and bored at the same time while watching a movie!

This is definitely one of the most eccentric and whimsical movies I've ever watched. Maybe it's too whimsical for its own good!

The movie as a whole didn't work for me, and I'm not really sure that I liked it. It feels like an overlong self-indulgent journey of surrealism. Undeniably, the movie could have been shorter, because it doesn't have too much to say. There is a lack of narrative cohesion, vision and creativity. That made the movie doesn't seem to focus on its main themes, but instead it uses a lot of unnecessary repetitive sub-plots that don't add so much to the main plot.There are a lot of things to admire about it, though.

Juliet of the Spirits is Fellini's first work in color, and it's one of the most beautiful and colorful movies I've seen in my life! It's nothing short of eye-catching. The movie also has a harmonious music that set the tone and created a unique atmosphere from the beginning. I also liked how the hallucination scenes were directed. Some of them were very disturbing, and not easy to watch. Also, the symbolism that has been used to depict the psyche of Giulietta Boldrini is awe-inspiring! From the technical standpoint this movie is almost perfect, except for the editing; it was really awful!

Giulietta Masina delivered a very expressive and emotional performance. I also appreciated the themes of the story. I actually was somewhat invested, once the movie focus on its main story. The only time the movie did so was in the last 20 minutes. I think the ending deserves 5 stars!

(6.5/10)
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The Spirits are with us ...
film-critic11 August 2005
I cannot wait to get my hands on my next adventure into the world of Fellini. I was more than impressed, I was captivated. I watched Giulietta degli spiriti (aka Juliet of the Spirits) and I couldn't help but think of other directors that have used Fellini's tactic in today's modern cinema. I think the reason I enjoyed this film so much is because I love the work of these directors, and I could see the homage they were paying in their films to Fellini. I am speaking of directors like David Lynch, Oliver Stone, and Akira Kurosawa. The colors, the images, and the overall elements of this film are original and provocative at the same time. You wouldn't expect this film a film created in 1965. I didn't when I put this film into the DVD player, but then I wasn't sure what to expect when I put Fellini into the player.

The colors are one of the boldest marks of the film. For this to be Fellini's first color film he pulls it off like a professional. The darkened shades to represent insecurity and the unknown, while the bold colors represent happiness and control. You wouldn't expect these emotions could be combined with ease, but Fellini's master brush never misses a beat. This film is told through its colors. From the opening scene where Juliet is choosing which color hair to wear, all the way to the ending where she leaves the bright white house into the darkened unknown, it is the vivacious colors that lead us from point A to point B. The characters are important, but these colors are used to represent the true emotions of the characters even when they are lying to themselves. These colors tell the truth and Fellini controls them.

I was always a believer that Oliver Stone's style of film-making was absurd and at times random, but little did I know that his odd placement of certain images is nothing more than a deep homage to Fellini. Since I have only seen one film, Giulietta degli spiriti, I can only take reference to it, but there were moments when I could have guessed Stone's hand was somewhere in the process. When Juliet sees the spirits, we are suddenly whisked away to a world of haunting images and imagination. We are afraid, yet excited at the same time. The scenes that come to mind are those when Juliet is at the beach and at the end when she finally confronts her demons. While some may see these as a director's "wet dream", I saw these as an insight into Juliet's character. We learn about her troubles, her life, her childhood, and her fears. It is these spirits that help us understand why Juliet is the way that she is, and why she has trouble leaving her cheating husband. They are a "guardian angel" for Juliet, ensuring that she stays true to whom she is even when times seem to be closing in on her. This is seen when she was about to do something sexually that she had not intention of doing. A moment of revenge saved by a spirit.

This was a magnificent story that could be retold today and appeal to mass audiences. Juliet is the common person, dealing with issues that face us today. The horror of discovering your husband is cheating on you and the spirits that you consult to help. Juliet is neither insane nor crazy, nor would I consider this a "tale of terror". This is a story about a normal person who is placed into extraordinary events that cause her to regress to her childhood. This also brings out the spirits from her childhood to help her in her bumpy path.

This is not to say that this film is without faults. While Fellini has obviously mastered the field of directing, showing us with bold colors and creative storytelling, there is something that could be said about his choice of music. I feel that the music used in this film conveyed a message opposite of what was to be felt. I felt that when we were to be shocked or surprised by Juliet, there should be equal music playing, but instead all I head was this happy go-lucky tune that seemed to trample the overall theme of the film. Perhaps Fellini used most of the money for the colors and story and only had one record left for the soundtrack of the film. Who knows? All I know is that the music used did not work in this film at all. If I could change one aspect of this film to bring it to perfection, it would be the score. What was Fellini thinking?

I would like to say that this first Fellini experience has been magical. I am glad I have the opportunity to share it with everyone, and if you take anything from this review it should be two things. First, don't insult a film until you have viewed it in its entirety, you never know what gems may just need to be polished to glimmer. The saying, "Never judge a book by its cover" applies to films as well. Second, go back to the basics. As I watch more and more older films, I begin to wonder the originality and uniqueness of the directors today. Some of the top performers in their game are beginning to show signs that they have "borrowed" from other directors. Perhaps they are paying homage, but perhaps there is more. Instead of walking out of a theater and saying, "WOW! I wonder why the director put that shot in there" (cause I know all of you think this), perhaps sit back and think about who they are saying "thank you" to. You may discover, as I have, that the original creative mind, no matter the date, can still be a powerful force in cinema.

Grade: ***** out of *****
13 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Disarray, Not in a Good Way
ASuiGeneris23 March 2018
Juliet of the Spirits (Italian: Giulietta degli spiriti) (1965)

Art film tackles Freud. Disturbing and indulgent, Surreal dreams, strange scenes, A female 8½, Technicolor Fellini!

Tanka, literally "short poem", is a form of poetry consisting of five lines, unrhymed, with the 5-7-5-7-7 syllable format. #Tanka #PoemReview
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
My life is filled with people who talk, talk, talk!
brogmiller1 March 2020
A masterpiece of 'baroque' film-making or just rambling and self-indulgent? Opinions on this first colour film of Fellini will always be divided. Superlative production values of course, technical virtuosity and a tantalising cast but this remains nonetheless a film without 'heart' which is less about character than about caricature whilst attempts to make the talented but diminutive Giulietta Masina look 'chic' are not entirely successful. I am glad to have finally seen this stylish exercise but would I wish to see it again? Probably not.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Cinema Omnivore - Juliet of the Spirits (1965) 7.2/10
lasttimeisaw27 October 2021
"However, the grace note here is Sandra Milo, who oozes sex appeal sometimes like a dominatrix, sometimes a ludic kitten, completely borne out of a heterosexual man's ultimate fantasy. Milo is head and shoulders above everyone else, Suzy is made to be fancied, ogled and then despised (she has a sugar daddy twice her age), yet, Milo defies this male-angle objectification, instead she enlivens her, makes her larger-than-life, even above-life, her self-assurance and lack of self-consciousness individualizes Suzy as a supernal creature, so the question is, why on earth would she lay her eyes on Giulietta?"

read my full review on my blog: Cinema Omnivore, thanks.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Way-Out Fellini
rcraig6215 July 2004
Federico Fellini seemed to think that to use the motion picture screen as a canvas for his imagery constituted great film art, and photographically, it does, but Juliet of the Spirits collapses under the weight of what is essentially another Fellini daydream of fantasy orgies.

Juliet of the Spirits is passed off as a tale about a woman's retreat into a fanasy world when she realizes her husband is cheating on her, but when we watch film after film of Fellini orgies (can you think of a movie of his that didn't have one?), whose fantasies are these really? Not Miss Masina's, I'm sure, and that's why it doesn't work. The imagery isn't really connected to anything, certainly not to the woman's character. This is simply a case of Fellini (45 when he made this picture) having a middle-age crisis and projecting his hidden desires on to a motion picture screen. Instead, I felt bad for Miss Masina, who is forced to wander through this pastiche, not only to confront her husband's sexual fantasies, but to participate in them as an up-close observer, which has the net effect of being invited to a party just to be shunned by the guests.

When we see the all-too-brief scenes of Miss Masina hiring detectives to tail her husband, we are suddenly reminded that she is really a terrific actress; they are the few truly absorbing bits in the film. But then, unfortunately, we return to the empty imagery, which isn't absorbing in the way 8 1/2 was or in Orson Welles' "The Trial". It is a montage, imagery for imagery's sake. The color is vivid and the compositions are superb, but that's about all I can say for it. Otherwise, it's the usual Fellini grotesques and ghastly faces in fright wigs and too much makeup. Even the young women are horrid, they look like young, inflammated Phyllis Dillers. And so goes Juliet of the Spirits, the decadent private thoughts of an aesthetic madman. 2 ** out of 4
26 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed