The Castle of the Living Dead is quite a good, little known thriller about a man named Count Drago who has found the secret to preserving life instantly, a sort of life in death concept. His castle is full of all kinds of creatures that are in death just as they were in life. Lee plays the title role with relish as he entertains a group of roving entertainers in his castle. The film is quite atmospheric with some very good chase scenes through dark corridors and a graveyard as well. The cast is pretty decent with a pint-sized dwarf besting all. The film is of some note as it is one of the earliest performances of Donald Sutherland, who has a field day playing an incompetent policeman and a witch/old hag. Quite a good European little horror film!
31 Reviews
A lower tier entry in the Italian Gothic cycle that makes for a desirable curiosity thanks to its cast and production history.
mwilson197617 March 2020
An intriguing slice of 'Golden Age Italian Gothic Horror,' this tale of a mad scientist called Count Drago (played by Christopher Lee) attempting to experiment on performers in a traveling circus rather than animals makes for a desirable curiosity piece, even though it's not very good. Alongside Lee, the cast includes Eurocult fave Philippe Leroy (The Frightened Woman), and Donald Sutherland in his first three film roles (he plays a Napoleonic soldier, an old man, and a Witch in heavy make up and a dress). As well as featuring an heroic dwarf named Nick, the movie has a complicated production history. Michael Reeves (Witchfinder General) received his first film credit aged just twenty, and a mere five years before his tragic barbiturate overdose, as assistant director, but it was rumoured that he contributed a lot more including directing an exciting sword fight on the castle walls. There were also rumours that Mario Bava provided special effects for the film. The movie was directed by Luciano Rick under the pseudonym of Warren Kiefer, and so grateful was Donald Sutherland for him giving him his first movie credit, that he named his son after him.
Low budget horror film has some legitimate worthwhile scares
AlsExGal2 September 2017
I've seen up to three directors credited for the film, although only Warren Kiefer is credited on the print I saw, as well as being credited as author of the story and screenplay. This low budget European shocker is the first film usually credited to Michael Reeves, who directed the horror classic "The Witchfinder General" (1968). His films are noted for their downbeat overall tone, and he directed only four feature length films before he died at age 25.
In 1820's Europe, a traveling circus gives a performance. Afterwards, they are invited to Count Drago's (Lee's) castle, to perform for him. On the way there, they are intercepted by an old woman who warns them against the castle and predicts some of them will die. As usual in such films, they ignore the warning and continue on anyways or else there would be no movie.
I've yet to find a good quality print of this film. It's American release was botched, and it ended up playing mostly drive-in theaters, and then fell into obscurity. The best quality print I have found has the ends cropped to make its aspect ratio 4:3.
Lee is head and shoulders better than the rest of the cast. Donald Sutherland is also notable in multiple roles in this, his first feature film appearance that was not a TV movie. The other actors are no better than adequate. The cinematography and score are both functional, at best. In the last 40 minutes, film stops and numbers are projected on screen for 15-30 seconds a couple of times.
If you are willing to overlook the films' faults (score, cinematography, abrupt changes in tone, and an ending that Reeves must have argued against) there are some good scares in this one.
It is worth sitting through if it ever comes your way. Weird factoid: Donald Sutherland's son Kiefer is named after the director. I have no idea exactly why.
In 1820's Europe, a traveling circus gives a performance. Afterwards, they are invited to Count Drago's (Lee's) castle, to perform for him. On the way there, they are intercepted by an old woman who warns them against the castle and predicts some of them will die. As usual in such films, they ignore the warning and continue on anyways or else there would be no movie.
I've yet to find a good quality print of this film. It's American release was botched, and it ended up playing mostly drive-in theaters, and then fell into obscurity. The best quality print I have found has the ends cropped to make its aspect ratio 4:3.
Lee is head and shoulders better than the rest of the cast. Donald Sutherland is also notable in multiple roles in this, his first feature film appearance that was not a TV movie. The other actors are no better than adequate. The cinematography and score are both functional, at best. In the last 40 minutes, film stops and numbers are projected on screen for 15-30 seconds a couple of times.
If you are willing to overlook the films' faults (score, cinematography, abrupt changes in tone, and an ending that Reeves must have argued against) there are some good scares in this one.
It is worth sitting through if it ever comes your way. Weird factoid: Donald Sutherland's son Kiefer is named after the director. I have no idea exactly why.
An Eerie Film With Great Ambiance
RGHeller508 December 2004
Ambiance is what it's all about, and this film has plenty of it. The setting is Europe during the Napoleonic era. A traveling circus troop has been invited to perform at a mysterious castle for a Count and his sleazy looking sidekick. This appears to be Donald Sutherland's first film, and he does a terrific job in a dual role. His presentation of an old hag-like witch is unforgettable. After seeing the movie, I found myself repeating some of the macabre rhymes, such as "Some will live and some will die before the morning sun is high." The acting is solid throughout. Don't expect a lot of action or violence. There's plenty of suspense throughout, however. The female minstrel is most exotic looking, and one watches in anticipation that she might eventually hike her skirt. The tension generated is occasionally broken by comic relief; some of it unintentional no doubt. There is a bit of sword play at the end, which appeared very awkward, but the awkwardness seemed to enhance the realism in a most peculiar way. It had been years since I had seen this film, and I fondly recalled it. I was successful in locating a reasonably crisp copy on DVD. I plan on watching it again soon. I easily rate it a 7 out of 10 based on entertainment value. After all, how many films can offer up their own midget toss?
Christopher Lee Classic '64 Film
whpratt111 January 2007
Secured this film off E-Bay and enjoyed this film from the beginning to the end. If you are a Christopher Lee fan and enjoy some of his early works, this is the film you will be interested in, as well as, the fact that Donald Sutherland, (Sgt. Paul/The Witch/Old Man) "Ask The Dusk", gives an outstanding role in this picture as many characters. This story is about a Count Drago, (Christopher Lee), "Charlie & the Chocolate Factory", who preserves many animals and keeps them in their natural appearance. You would probably say it was taxidermy, but this is another form of transformation that works and in an entirely different way. The Count invites a carnival group to entertain him at his mysterious castle where the carnival act shows a man being hanged and brought back to life. Gaia Germani, (Laura) gives a great supporting role as the attractive female who is adored by Count Drago and some other weird and sick looking people. This is a rather early film for Christopher Lee and Donald Sutherland and you can see from their performance they were going to be great stars on the Silver Screen. Great Classic Horror Film.
finally found this one on TCM
Judexdot11 November 2005
Warning: Spoilers
well, I've been looking for this for years, another film lost in the NAFTA/GATT shuffle. Amazingly enough, and with little fanfare, Turner Classic Movies dredged up a "restored" print and sneaked it in late night on Halloween, 2005.
Christopher Lee is his usual charismatic self, despite smudges around his eyes as the only real makeup. The plot isn't much of a mystery, but it's fun to watch the cast run through the paces. Often confused with "Blood Castle"/"Torture chamber of Doctor Sadism" in reference works, it's easy to see that many never saw it, since it isn't all that similar except for the star.
The two reasons that kept me looking are writer/1st assistant director Michael Reeves, and the debut role for Donald Sutherland. Reeves did his first direction on this, and some things will seem rather familiar to fans of "She beast", and "Witchfinder General", his later works.
Sutherland plays 2 roles: an unintelligent soldier, and an old hag who speaks prophecy in rhyme. The hag is voiced by another, but Sutherland did his own dubbing for the soldier. Luciano Pigozzi turns up to add his own charm to the proceedings.
Despite comments by others about there not being a huge need for restoration, I have to thank TCM for a lovely job, though the letterbox seems a little tight on top. it's old fashioned, and somewhat obvious, but definitely worthy of preservation.
Christopher Lee is his usual charismatic self, despite smudges around his eyes as the only real makeup. The plot isn't much of a mystery, but it's fun to watch the cast run through the paces. Often confused with "Blood Castle"/"Torture chamber of Doctor Sadism" in reference works, it's easy to see that many never saw it, since it isn't all that similar except for the star.
The two reasons that kept me looking are writer/1st assistant director Michael Reeves, and the debut role for Donald Sutherland. Reeves did his first direction on this, and some things will seem rather familiar to fans of "She beast", and "Witchfinder General", his later works.
Sutherland plays 2 roles: an unintelligent soldier, and an old hag who speaks prophecy in rhyme. The hag is voiced by another, but Sutherland did his own dubbing for the soldier. Luciano Pigozzi turns up to add his own charm to the proceedings.
Despite comments by others about there not being a huge need for restoration, I have to thank TCM for a lovely job, though the letterbox seems a little tight on top. it's old fashioned, and somewhat obvious, but definitely worthy of preservation.
Christopher Lee, Donald Sutherland and a Dwarf Walk Into a Bar...
utgard1431 October 2013
Low budget Italian horror film is no big shakes but there's a few things worth mentioning about it. First, it's Donald Sutherland's film debut (in two roles, no less). Why they had him dress up as old hag I do not know. Budgetary reasons I suppose. Sutherland does nothing to impress in his debut. We also have the great Christopher Lee slumming here and giving a typically solid Lee performance, though not his best. There's also a dwarf among the circus performers. He's pretty good and gets to be a hero, which will impress certain types.
The story is about a troupe of circus performers summoned to a castle to entertain the mysterious Count Drago (Lee). Little do they know Drago is a weirdo who performs experiments involving embalming animals and people. This certainly sounds intriguing enough but somehow the film manages to be unexceptional and, for the most part, boring. Lee completists and Spaghetti horror fans will want to check it out. I wouldn't recommend it to anyone else.
The story is about a troupe of circus performers summoned to a castle to entertain the mysterious Count Drago (Lee). Little do they know Drago is a weirdo who performs experiments involving embalming animals and people. This certainly sounds intriguing enough but somehow the film manages to be unexceptional and, for the most part, boring. Lee completists and Spaghetti horror fans will want to check it out. I wouldn't recommend it to anyone else.
Drago Inc. For all your taxidermy fetishes!
Coventry28 June 2022
After the many years I spent searching for "Castle of the Living Dead" and considering the rather high price I eventually paid for the Blu-Ray DVD, I can't help feeling a little bit disappointed. Surely, it's a fun and spooky gothic euro-horror effort, but it doesn't come close in terms of quality to some of Christopher Lee's other contemporary work in the same genre, like "The City of the Dead", "The Virgin of Nuremberg" or "The Torture Chamber of Dr. Sadism".
Compared to these three, and various other classic Gothic horrors, "Castle of the Living Dead" is a lot less atmospheric and unsettling, and the plot isn't very engaging. The opening sequences are still quite grim, with a mysteriously eerie figure randomly killing and abducting people in a forest. This person than invites a traveling circus community to come and perform privately at the castle of his master; - Count Drago. The count (Lee) turns out to be a fanatic taxidermist, but he doesn't necessarily only stuff animal, and his object don't necessarily have to be dead...
The film is ineffective as a wholesome, due to the muddled script and slow pacing, but several isolated highlights make this film worthwhile. There is, naturally, the intimidating performance of Christopher Lee (with pitch-black eyes), but also strong supportive roles by Mirko Valentin (as the nasty henchman) and Antonio De Martino (as a heroic dwarf), ominous set-pieces (like a tunnel entrance shaped as a devil face) and a few creepy shots of a room full of stuffed ...objects. Most reviewers mention the dual role of Donald Sutherland as another highlight, but I found his performance rather hysterical. But, most of all, I missed the feeling of genuine fright. Shame.
Compared to these three, and various other classic Gothic horrors, "Castle of the Living Dead" is a lot less atmospheric and unsettling, and the plot isn't very engaging. The opening sequences are still quite grim, with a mysteriously eerie figure randomly killing and abducting people in a forest. This person than invites a traveling circus community to come and perform privately at the castle of his master; - Count Drago. The count (Lee) turns out to be a fanatic taxidermist, but he doesn't necessarily only stuff animal, and his object don't necessarily have to be dead...
The film is ineffective as a wholesome, due to the muddled script and slow pacing, but several isolated highlights make this film worthwhile. There is, naturally, the intimidating performance of Christopher Lee (with pitch-black eyes), but also strong supportive roles by Mirko Valentin (as the nasty henchman) and Antonio De Martino (as a heroic dwarf), ominous set-pieces (like a tunnel entrance shaped as a devil face) and a few creepy shots of a room full of stuffed ...objects. Most reviewers mention the dual role of Donald Sutherland as another highlight, but I found his performance rather hysterical. But, most of all, I missed the feeling of genuine fright. Shame.
Excellent script ideas indifferently executed
planktonrules2 February 2008
The idea of CASTLE OF THE LIVING DEAD is pretty exciting--a crazy Count has created a process to instantly embalm any living creature and is always on the lookout to increase his sick menagerie. When a traveling performing troop is invited to this bizarre castle, you know that he's up to no good and their lives are in danger.
Unfortunately, while the idea is rather original and cool, this Italian production bears the marks of a very, very low-budget production. While Christopher Lee is just fine in the lead, most of the rest of the cast appear to be amateurs and their limp performances betray this. Of all the cast, the weirdest decision was having a young Donald Sutherland (in his first major film role) play two major parts--poorly (he also plays a 3rd role--standing in the audience at the beginning of the film). I really think that they had him play the sergeant and old lady simply to save money--because I can't think of why they'd do this otherwise. If you like hammy first performances, then you might like watching Sutherland--particularly as he plays the crazy old lady with the same gusto as you'd expect in a high school production.
Oddly, the print quality of this film when it was shown on Turner Classic Movies was very poor--it was very, very dark and the print wasn't very crisp. Yet, at the beginning of the film, it indicated it had just been restored. I sure would hate to see what it looked like BEFORE the restoration.
So overall, it's a diverting film with a nice story idea that just doesn't hold up due to the lousy budget. Lousy acting, lousy camera work and a very poor sound track--this one is for fans of horror and that's really all.
Unfortunately, while the idea is rather original and cool, this Italian production bears the marks of a very, very low-budget production. While Christopher Lee is just fine in the lead, most of the rest of the cast appear to be amateurs and their limp performances betray this. Of all the cast, the weirdest decision was having a young Donald Sutherland (in his first major film role) play two major parts--poorly (he also plays a 3rd role--standing in the audience at the beginning of the film). I really think that they had him play the sergeant and old lady simply to save money--because I can't think of why they'd do this otherwise. If you like hammy first performances, then you might like watching Sutherland--particularly as he plays the crazy old lady with the same gusto as you'd expect in a high school production.
Oddly, the print quality of this film when it was shown on Turner Classic Movies was very poor--it was very, very dark and the print wasn't very crisp. Yet, at the beginning of the film, it indicated it had just been restored. I sure would hate to see what it looked like BEFORE the restoration.
So overall, it's a diverting film with a nice story idea that just doesn't hold up due to the lousy budget. Lousy acting, lousy camera work and a very poor sound track--this one is for fans of horror and that's really all.
They don't make them like this anymore (and probably shouldn't)
Jerry-9324 July 2000
Back in the '50s and '60s, these Evil-Count-Doing-Something-Bad movies were a dime a dozen. Nowadays, you're lucky if you get one every five years. Which is not necessarily a bad thing if all the entries turned out like this one.
The movie involves a traveling band of minstrels traveling to the castle of Count Drago (Christopher Lee, sporting an odd makeup job) to perform. Once there, they find that the Count has an interesting taxidermy hobby. As you will have figured out in the first 15 minutes, the Count has more in store for the minstrels than they expected.
This movie isn't so much about Lee's plans to turn everthing into a statue (his creations aren't stuffed carcasses; they're permanently frozen while living); it's about the stupidity of the minstrels. Look at these examples of how they completely miss the fact that they are in danger:
* they don't suspect anything being invited to a remote castle for a private appearance for three gold pieces (!!), or when they're warned by an old hag (Donald Sutherland, for Christ's sake!!) that they will die if they go to the castle;
* when Lee tells the lead minstrel that he has started using humans, but substitutes the word "animal" for "human", the minstrel doesn't catch on;
* the strongman/firebreather doesn't notice the evil henchman standing 10 feet away, preparing to shoot him in the eye with a crossbow;
* the female minstrel doesn't realize that a man she knew is dead, even though he is completely immobile and attached to a stand, nor does she catch on when the Count talks of giving her "eternal beauty" as codewords for killing her.
This film does have other problems. The print I saw looked like it had been through the washing machine (I really don't see a big preservation movement for this one). The acting is pretty wooden (the terrible dubbing doesn't help either). Sutherland (who plays a soldier as well the hag) plays the soldier role with all the seriousness he played the surgeon Hawkeye Pierce. There are a few redeeming moments, though: when the henchman throws the midget minstrel off the top of the castle (he lives, but it's nice to believe that he won't), and the great expression Lee has to hold at the end of the movie (he sure is shaking a lot for a statue). Other than that, there no reason to recommend this movie. Die-hard Lee fans may not even enjoy it.
The movie involves a traveling band of minstrels traveling to the castle of Count Drago (Christopher Lee, sporting an odd makeup job) to perform. Once there, they find that the Count has an interesting taxidermy hobby. As you will have figured out in the first 15 minutes, the Count has more in store for the minstrels than they expected.
This movie isn't so much about Lee's plans to turn everthing into a statue (his creations aren't stuffed carcasses; they're permanently frozen while living); it's about the stupidity of the minstrels. Look at these examples of how they completely miss the fact that they are in danger:
* they don't suspect anything being invited to a remote castle for a private appearance for three gold pieces (!!), or when they're warned by an old hag (Donald Sutherland, for Christ's sake!!) that they will die if they go to the castle;
* when Lee tells the lead minstrel that he has started using humans, but substitutes the word "animal" for "human", the minstrel doesn't catch on;
* the strongman/firebreather doesn't notice the evil henchman standing 10 feet away, preparing to shoot him in the eye with a crossbow;
* the female minstrel doesn't realize that a man she knew is dead, even though he is completely immobile and attached to a stand, nor does she catch on when the Count talks of giving her "eternal beauty" as codewords for killing her.
This film does have other problems. The print I saw looked like it had been through the washing machine (I really don't see a big preservation movement for this one). The acting is pretty wooden (the terrible dubbing doesn't help either). Sutherland (who plays a soldier as well the hag) plays the soldier role with all the seriousness he played the surgeon Hawkeye Pierce. There are a few redeeming moments, though: when the henchman throws the midget minstrel off the top of the castle (he lives, but it's nice to believe that he won't), and the great expression Lee has to hold at the end of the movie (he sure is shaking a lot for a statue). Other than that, there no reason to recommend this movie. Die-hard Lee fans may not even enjoy it.
A film seen as a boy, still amuses the best of us dwarf cinema voyeurs.
cuzdogg1 November 2005
A delightful B-Horror film filled with odd characters, shadowed corridors, and a decent plot...Castle of the Living Dead, when viewed late at night, will keep the viewer more amused than scared. I first saw this film as a boy and forever thereafter, tried to remember the title so I could see it again. Where else can you find a movie other than Lord of the Rings, with a heroic dwarf (wish he was born later in life so that he could have played Frodo)and his side kick deaf-mute giant (perhaps the inspiration for Miller's MasterBlaster), Donald Sutherland as a witch and a bungling police/soldier (keeping his trademark smirk in tact), and a beautiful female victim that is saved from poisoning by a thirsty cat. Also, two other performances must be given honorable mention...the sullen Cristopher Lee playing Count Drago, who bears the resemblance of a Gothic Heroin addict..and his henchman Sandro, whose bulging eyes and psycho-drenched laugh, make for added cinema enjoyment. This is a foreign film and carries some of the Socio-pathic drama an early 1960's horror film might entail. No graphic slashing here, but the dart in the eye of the lowly deaf/mute delivers a taste for future gore films. The dubbing is close enough to understand and keeps in pace with the film's B- status. The plot line is basic, but interesting...taking place just after the Napoleanic Wars, a mad Count who is interested in science, discovers a way of prolonging life...only his results are stereotypically creepy. When a traveling troupe of circus performers are bid to come and entertain at his castle, the plot enfolds into a all-out who is going to live and who is going to die story. Sutherland's witch character prophesizes this much, so the tension mounts towards who the final survivors will be. I loved the set of this movie, which must have been filmed on location. The Castle's giant faced back entrance is a must see and the huge stone animal objects in the entangled gardens, make this Black and White film eerie and strange. Wind, shadows, moonlit night, large castle chambers and outdoor gardens...all the makings of a chilling tale. I highly recommend this film, but suggest to view it only late, late, late night...with a pot of popcorn and maybe with one friend. Also, this could be a perfect slumber party film, as well...but would be so with differing results. For when you add these odd Castle of the Living Dead characters, with a mixture of humorous comments and tired people...the outcome is sure to create a cult film status for a new generation of viewers.
cuzdogg
cuzdogg
Bonkers Gothic Horror
Bezenby21 December 2017
Warning: Spoilers
This Gothic Horror dispenses with heaving cleavage, secret passages and all that jazz for a cautionary tale regarding trusting creepy ass Counts who hand you invitations to their similarly creepy castles, and, strangely even for a Euro-horror film, it has Donald Sutherland playing three separate roles...for some reason.
Those invited are a travelling troupe of performers led by greedy jerk Bruno, who travels with sister Laura, deaf/mute Gianni, level headed dwarf Nick, and newly recruited horny jerk Philip Leroy, who has taken over the role of Harlequin from violent jerk Luciano Pigozzi, who has flounced off after a bar fight with Bruno. This lot head off to the castle on the promise of a lot of cash, despite the warning of an old witch (Donald Sutherland!) who speaks only in rhyme.
The first strange occurrence happens shortly afterwards when Philipe finds what looks like a stuffed crow stuck to a tree branch. Puzzled, he casts it aside and heads for the castle anyway, all the time hitting on Laura while Bruno grunts about the money they'll all make.
Of course, Christopher Lee plays Count Drago, who lives in the castle with his hulking man servant. Drago appears to be quite the rabid taxidermist, as his castle is stuffed with all sorts of animals. You'd have to be some sort of actor in a cheap horror film to not guess where things are heading next...especially when Drago mentions that the new creature he's working with is 'the most dangerous of all'.
Some people hate this film for some reason, but I found the set up different from the usual gothic horror clichés. Apart from Donald Sutherland's performance as the witch, and the bumbling soldier, it's good that the main hero of the piece ends up being the dwarf, rather than Philipe Leroy. I did have a good laugh at the dwarf dummy that is thrown off the side of the castle, mind. The sight of Donald Sutherland as an old crone speaking in rhyme and making a dwarf touch his/her hump for luck is something to behold also.
I think this is also the earliest film I know that uses the Gardens of Bomarzo (aka The Sacred Grove or Park of the Monsters) as a location. Created in the 16th Century, this place is full of bizarre sculptures and buildings used by some fella to cope with the grief of his wife's passing. The Orcus is the most famous of the sculptures, having been used in the film The Relic, the naked Sherilyn Fenn film Phantoms, and of course Luigi Cozzi's utterly demented and classic film The Adventures of Hercules (which is one of the most entertaining films ever made).
Those invited are a travelling troupe of performers led by greedy jerk Bruno, who travels with sister Laura, deaf/mute Gianni, level headed dwarf Nick, and newly recruited horny jerk Philip Leroy, who has taken over the role of Harlequin from violent jerk Luciano Pigozzi, who has flounced off after a bar fight with Bruno. This lot head off to the castle on the promise of a lot of cash, despite the warning of an old witch (Donald Sutherland!) who speaks only in rhyme.
The first strange occurrence happens shortly afterwards when Philipe finds what looks like a stuffed crow stuck to a tree branch. Puzzled, he casts it aside and heads for the castle anyway, all the time hitting on Laura while Bruno grunts about the money they'll all make.
Of course, Christopher Lee plays Count Drago, who lives in the castle with his hulking man servant. Drago appears to be quite the rabid taxidermist, as his castle is stuffed with all sorts of animals. You'd have to be some sort of actor in a cheap horror film to not guess where things are heading next...especially when Drago mentions that the new creature he's working with is 'the most dangerous of all'.
Some people hate this film for some reason, but I found the set up different from the usual gothic horror clichés. Apart from Donald Sutherland's performance as the witch, and the bumbling soldier, it's good that the main hero of the piece ends up being the dwarf, rather than Philipe Leroy. I did have a good laugh at the dwarf dummy that is thrown off the side of the castle, mind. The sight of Donald Sutherland as an old crone speaking in rhyme and making a dwarf touch his/her hump for luck is something to behold also.
I think this is also the earliest film I know that uses the Gardens of Bomarzo (aka The Sacred Grove or Park of the Monsters) as a location. Created in the 16th Century, this place is full of bizarre sculptures and buildings used by some fella to cope with the grief of his wife's passing. The Orcus is the most famous of the sculptures, having been used in the film The Relic, the naked Sherilyn Fenn film Phantoms, and of course Luigi Cozzi's utterly demented and classic film The Adventures of Hercules (which is one of the most entertaining films ever made).
Completely lacklustre Gothic horror
The_Void10 March 2008
"Castle of the Living Dead" sounds like quite a generic title that could be given to just about any movie; but in this case it actually is relevant to the plot of the film. The plot is actually not bad and is something of a cross-over between the mad scientist and Gothic horror genres as we follow the owner of an old castle as he lures people to him and proceeds to mummify them to 'preserve their beauty'. The plot actually isn't bad, but unfortunately the execution is lacklustre in the extreme and what we end up with is a frankly boring horror film. Apparently it took three people to direct this film - I have no idea how - but interestingly, one of the names on the directors list is Michael Reeves; the unfortunate director behind the masterpiece 'Witchfinder General' in 1968. The film feels very cheap and the black and white cinematography only adds to that, rather than adding atmosphere as is often the case with Gothic horror from this period. The most notable thing about this film is obviously the presence of the great Christopher Lee, though in fitting with the rest of the movie; he's not at his best and his performance feels rather flat. There's also a triple role for fellow legend Donald Sutherland. The movie drones on for about ninety minutes with barely a scare in sight and we finish on an unsurprising note. Overall, this is not a good film and I don't recommend it.
Castle of the Living Dead
Michael_Elliott25 February 2008
Castle of the Living Dead, The (1964)
** (out of 4)
A group of entertainers are invited by Count Drago (Christopher Lee) to perform at his castle but soon they start to fall dead. An old evil witch (Donald Sutherland) would have you believe that the castle has a certain evil inside. This Italian made horror film is also known as Castello dei morti vivi, Il but under either title this film is a dud. As with many Italian horrors of this period, you have the dark castle, creepy locations and weird storyline but none of them come off very well here. The story moves at a snails pace, which is another thing that haunts many of the horror films from this era. The music score was actually the best thing about the movie so listening to the soundtrack would be better than watching the film. Lee gives a decent performance but for the most part it seems like he's just cashing a paycheck. I did like the fact that they had him looking like Lugosi's character from White Zombie. Donald Sutherland steals the show as he plays three different characters including an old man and the old witch that the troop stumble across on their way to the castle. Sutherland is excellent as the old woman and you really have to look hard to notice that it's him.
** (out of 4)
A group of entertainers are invited by Count Drago (Christopher Lee) to perform at his castle but soon they start to fall dead. An old evil witch (Donald Sutherland) would have you believe that the castle has a certain evil inside. This Italian made horror film is also known as Castello dei morti vivi, Il but under either title this film is a dud. As with many Italian horrors of this period, you have the dark castle, creepy locations and weird storyline but none of them come off very well here. The story moves at a snails pace, which is another thing that haunts many of the horror films from this era. The music score was actually the best thing about the movie so listening to the soundtrack would be better than watching the film. Lee gives a decent performance but for the most part it seems like he's just cashing a paycheck. I did like the fact that they had him looking like Lugosi's character from White Zombie. Donald Sutherland steals the show as he plays three different characters including an old man and the old witch that the troop stumble across on their way to the castle. Sutherland is excellent as the old woman and you really have to look hard to notice that it's him.
"Killing a raven is no joke"
hwg1957-102-26570425 October 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Just after the Napoleonic wars a troupe of peripatetic performers are invited by the local count to perform at his castle up the road. Needless to say the castle is eerie and the sinister Count Drago has things on his mind other than hospitality and showmanship. I quite enjoyed this movie though it's not that original in its plotting. Good value is given by the great Christopher Lee as Drago and surprisingly but entertainingly Donald Sutherland as a military sergeant and an old witch! Also liked Mirko Valentin as the murderous Sandro and Antonio De Martino as the heroic Nick.
The film is stuffed with visual delights from the spooky interiors and the well chosen castle and garden locations, all filmed in beautiful black and white. Really liked the room of preserved bodies that appear near the end. Very creepy. There is a nice cat too but it only appears briefly. A. Francesco Lavagnino gives another flawless music score.
The film is stuffed with visual delights from the spooky interiors and the well chosen castle and garden locations, all filmed in beautiful black and white. Really liked the room of preserved bodies that appear near the end. Very creepy. There is a nice cat too but it only appears briefly. A. Francesco Lavagnino gives another flawless music score.
The film debut of Donald Sutherland.
BA_Harrison11 August 2022
Christopher Lee pops up in a lot of shonky Euro-horror, but I didn't expect to see Donald Sutherland's name to appear in the opening credits for Castle of the Living Dead. Sutherland's big screen debut sees the actor playing multiple roles: firstly, he plays an old hag who warns the members of a travelling acting troupe of impending death if they continue to the castle of Count Drago (Lee) where they are to perform; then he plays the incompetent police sargeant who is oblivious to the count's experiments in the suspension of life, using humans subjects; and according to IMDb, Sutherland also plays an old man, but I don't recall seeing that character.
The film's main star, Christopher Lee, could play his role in his sleep: villanous aristocrat Count Drago is bread and butter for the actor. The count is assisted in his work by a drooling maniac called Sandro (Mirko Valentin), who captures victims for Drago. In the film's best (ie. Funniest) scene, Sandro chases Nick (Antonio De Martino), the troupe's heroic dwarf, to the top of a tower, picks the little fellow up and throws him over the parapet. The dwarf, or rather a very unconvincing dummy, falls and lands on a pile of hay. Extra points awarded for dwarf throwing! Another cool moment sees Drago using a toy catapult to fire a poisoned dart into a man's eye. Nasty!
The direction by Warren Kiefer is rather clumsy, as is the editing, and the dubbing is terrible, but the crude technical nature of the film adds to its charm. Kiefer does make good use of his gothic location, especially the ornamental gardens and grottos that surround the castle (I know I've seen that place in another old horror film, but I can't quite put my finger in it*). All in all, this is a fun piece of low-budget Euro-horror that trundles along at a decent pace and never bores -- far from a classic but certainly worth a go for fans of this kind of hokum.
*I just read Bezenby's review, which lists other films that use the same location. The film I was trying to think of was Meridian (AKA Phantoms) starring Sherilyn Fenn.
The film's main star, Christopher Lee, could play his role in his sleep: villanous aristocrat Count Drago is bread and butter for the actor. The count is assisted in his work by a drooling maniac called Sandro (Mirko Valentin), who captures victims for Drago. In the film's best (ie. Funniest) scene, Sandro chases Nick (Antonio De Martino), the troupe's heroic dwarf, to the top of a tower, picks the little fellow up and throws him over the parapet. The dwarf, or rather a very unconvincing dummy, falls and lands on a pile of hay. Extra points awarded for dwarf throwing! Another cool moment sees Drago using a toy catapult to fire a poisoned dart into a man's eye. Nasty!
The direction by Warren Kiefer is rather clumsy, as is the editing, and the dubbing is terrible, but the crude technical nature of the film adds to its charm. Kiefer does make good use of his gothic location, especially the ornamental gardens and grottos that surround the castle (I know I've seen that place in another old horror film, but I can't quite put my finger in it*). All in all, this is a fun piece of low-budget Euro-horror that trundles along at a decent pace and never bores -- far from a classic but certainly worth a go for fans of this kind of hokum.
*I just read Bezenby's review, which lists other films that use the same location. The film I was trying to think of was Meridian (AKA Phantoms) starring Sherilyn Fenn.
An Italo gothic horror with an interesting cast and crew
vampire_hounddog29 July 2020
A band of travelling comeddia dell'arte performers stop off at Count Drago's (Christopher Lee) castle for a performance, despite having been warned by a witch (played by Donald Sutherland in a dual role that also includes the police officer). It turns out that Drago is obsessed by taxidermy and uses an instant serum to make his victims a living dead, but doesn't stop at animals and has his own chamber of human curiosities.
THE CASTLE OF THE LIVING DEAD (Il castello dei morti vivi) is an Italian-French co-production darkly shot by Aldo Tonti and atmospherically shot in both Bomarzo Park's 'Parco dei Mostri' (Park of Monsters) for the sculptures and a castle in Bracchino (also in Lazio outside of Rome). Filmed on a low budget and directed by Warren Kiefer in his first film, the crew also included a young Michael Reeves who was an assistant director on the film. During his brief career, he would later go on to make THE SORCERERS (1967) and WITCHFINDER GENERAL (1968). Lee was only available for 10 days of the 24 day shoot and this was to be the first film for the 28 year-old Sutherland. As a side note, when Sutherland's son was born in1966 he was named after the director.
THE CASTLE OF THE LIVING DEAD (Il castello dei morti vivi) is an Italian-French co-production darkly shot by Aldo Tonti and atmospherically shot in both Bomarzo Park's 'Parco dei Mostri' (Park of Monsters) for the sculptures and a castle in Bracchino (also in Lazio outside of Rome). Filmed on a low budget and directed by Warren Kiefer in his first film, the crew also included a young Michael Reeves who was an assistant director on the film. During his brief career, he would later go on to make THE SORCERERS (1967) and WITCHFINDER GENERAL (1968). Lee was only available for 10 days of the 24 day shoot and this was to be the first film for the 28 year-old Sutherland. As a side note, when Sutherland's son was born in1966 he was named after the director.
Castle of the Living Dead
Scarecrow-8828 February 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Terror awaits a troupe of street performers, and a wandering sojourner accompanying them, when they accept an invite to the mysterious Count Drago's castle. They will receive quite a nice wage for their performances as they attempt to supposedly entertain Drago, a scientist who enjoys the art of embalming animals of all kinds as a way of capturing their eternal beauty. This unhealthy obsession yields a terrifying secret..Drago wishes to add the troupe to his collection! Drago has perfected a unique formula which, after injection, causes the victim to freeze instantaneously, forever as they were without the threat of old age removing their beauty and form. Like mannequins, Drago has a whole room enshrined with the bodies of victims he has froze! Will our troupe be able to escape? Drago has a sadistic henchman-manservant Sandro(Mirko Valentin)he uses to capture and kill victims. Donald Sutherland is a treat in dual roles..one as an idiotic officer who bumbles through a sure crime practically right in front of him(..it's unclear just how many times Drago has duped him)and a vengeful witch who seeks retribution towards Drago who once tried out his experiments on her. Gaia Germani portrays the lovely Laura, who Drago obsesses over due to her beauty. Phillippe Leroy is Laura's love-interest, Eric, a former soldier traveling the roads until he met the troupe as two of their group were into an altercation over wages from a street performance. Sutherland's witch forewarned the troupe against going to the castle, but they do not heed her warnings. She informs the troupe's dwarf that he would remain unharmed thanks to an amulet she gives to him.
Okay little low-budget horror outing. To be honest, I found it unspectacular with a pace that drags a bit..the film felt much longer than it actually was. But, the castle setting is quite well utilized; I thought the premise was ghoulish enough. Lee was alright, but I thought Mirko, as his cruel lieutenant, stole this feature.
Okay little low-budget horror outing. To be honest, I found it unspectacular with a pace that drags a bit..the film felt much longer than it actually was. But, the castle setting is quite well utilized; I thought the premise was ghoulish enough. Lee was alright, but I thought Mirko, as his cruel lieutenant, stole this feature.
Very minor European horror film
preppy-311 November 2005
A traveling troupe of actors are requested to put on a personal show for Count Drago (Christopher Lee) in his castle. They don't know he has some sinister plans for them.
There's a lot wrong with this--with the exception of Lee and Donald Sutherland everyone is badly dubbed; Lee looks silly with the goatee and black eye makeup; Sutherland looks even sillier playing an old female witch (!!!!); there are many boring sections; the plot is just dumb and more than a little vague.
There are some good things about this:Lee overplays his part (and is enjoying himself), logic aside the script isn't half bad and it is pretty well-directed. But mostly this is a slow dull horror movie. I caught it originally on TV when I was a kid in the 1970s. Even then I thought it was silly! For Lee completists only. Otherwise, skip it
There's a lot wrong with this--with the exception of Lee and Donald Sutherland everyone is badly dubbed; Lee looks silly with the goatee and black eye makeup; Sutherland looks even sillier playing an old female witch (!!!!); there are many boring sections; the plot is just dumb and more than a little vague.
There are some good things about this:Lee overplays his part (and is enjoying himself), logic aside the script isn't half bad and it is pretty well-directed. But mostly this is a slow dull horror movie. I caught it originally on TV when I was a kid in the 1970s. Even then I thought it was silly! For Lee completists only. Otherwise, skip it
Quite enjoyable.
Hey_Sweden17 May 2023
"The Castle of the Living Dead" is a lively Italian Gothic starring the incomparable genre star Sir Christopher Lee. Lee plays Count Drago, who invites a theatrical troupe to his castle so that they may perform for him. However, any horror fan worth their salt can easily figure out that Drago probably has another, more sinister purpose in mind regarding these individuals....
Co-written by prolific producer Paul Maslansky (whose career has included everything from "The She-Beast" to "Death Line" to "Race with the Devil" to the "Police Academy" comedies), this is an awful lot of fun. Maybe not a truly great genre film, but it's playful and macabre at the same time, with an ample amount of humor, good atmosphere, striking imagery / location work, an excellent score by Angelo Francesco Lavagnino, and a ready & willing cast.
Lee is marvelous as always, Mirko Valentin has a very distinctive face as his creepy henchman Sandro, Antonio De Martino is endearing as helpful little person "Neep" / Nick, and Gaia Germani is a lovely, luminous leading lady. Fans of Italian horror will immediately note the presence of the equally prolific Luciano Pigozzi, who plays the argumentative and larcenous Dart. But what gives "The Castle of the Living Dead" the most stature today is the fact that it marks the first official feature film credit for a young Donald Sutherland, who's a total hoot in no less than three roles: the bumbling Sgt. Paul, the mystical old crone who speaks in rhyme, and an old man.
If you enjoy cult Euro-horror movies, this somewhat obscure effort could be right up your alley.
As you may well have figured out, Sutherland named his first-born son / fellow actor Kiefer after the co-writer and credited director of this picture, Warren Kiefer.
Seven out of 10.
Co-written by prolific producer Paul Maslansky (whose career has included everything from "The She-Beast" to "Death Line" to "Race with the Devil" to the "Police Academy" comedies), this is an awful lot of fun. Maybe not a truly great genre film, but it's playful and macabre at the same time, with an ample amount of humor, good atmosphere, striking imagery / location work, an excellent score by Angelo Francesco Lavagnino, and a ready & willing cast.
Lee is marvelous as always, Mirko Valentin has a very distinctive face as his creepy henchman Sandro, Antonio De Martino is endearing as helpful little person "Neep" / Nick, and Gaia Germani is a lovely, luminous leading lady. Fans of Italian horror will immediately note the presence of the equally prolific Luciano Pigozzi, who plays the argumentative and larcenous Dart. But what gives "The Castle of the Living Dead" the most stature today is the fact that it marks the first official feature film credit for a young Donald Sutherland, who's a total hoot in no less than three roles: the bumbling Sgt. Paul, the mystical old crone who speaks in rhyme, and an old man.
If you enjoy cult Euro-horror movies, this somewhat obscure effort could be right up your alley.
As you may well have figured out, Sutherland named his first-born son / fellow actor Kiefer after the co-writer and credited director of this picture, Warren Kiefer.
Seven out of 10.
For Die-Hard Christopher Lee Fans
Uriah4328 February 2013
Normally I like movies of this kind and from this era quite a bit. But quite frankly, this wasn't one of Christopher Lee's better performances. Be that as it may, this story revolves around a gypsy harlequin wagon as it travels from town to town in France after the Napoleonic Wars. Christopher Lee plays "Count Drago" who invites the small group to his castle where he tries to embalm them due to an insane idea that it will keep them from aging. Never mind the fact that in order to do this he has to kill them first. At any rate, as I said before it wasn't his best performance by a long shot. But while Christopher Lee didn't necessarily achieve his usual standard it was still far better than the performance of Donald Sutherland who played both "Sgt. Paul" and "the witch". Both of those efforts were ghastly in my opinion. That said, about the only bright spot in this film was the presence of the beautiful Gaia Germani as "Laura". But even so she wasn't able to lift this film up all by herself. All things considered then, while it wasn't terribly bad I would only recommend it for die-hard Christopher Lee fans or for those who enjoy horror films from this period. Otherwise it's probably best to look for something a bit more recent.
Count of eternal youth and eternal beauty
foxmasters1 April 2021
Post-war situation in Europe: A narrator introduces the story and mentions that although the war was over, the killing had not stopped. Actors are performing tricks in a marketplace. One of the viewers seems so excited that he circulates an envelope that promises the actors 3 gold pieces if they give a private performance. They agree to it, but it quickly becomes clear that they are dealing with a dangerous lord of the castle who keeps some dark secrets.
No great peak of horror, but overall enjoyable and well done
I_Ailurophile1 October 2023
One suggested alternative title: "The actors and the overzealous taxidermist."
Initial exposition is a smidgen scattered, gelling only as the characters approach the primary setting, that lovely castle where the imaginative art direction can truly take over. I don't think it's unfair to argue that the storytelling is also a smidgen scattered generally, though, bouncing back and forth a little; in addition, this carries itself with a tone that's less than perfectly serious, and I further believe this to be an instance where the small size of the chief cast, set against the large surroundings, only serves to accentuate the artificiality of the presentation. Young Christopher Lee, seemingly doing his best impression of the theatricality of Vincent Price is a somewhat odd sight, but welcome; young Donald Sutherland, fulfilling a few small roles, carries himself with a mirth rather unbecoming the nature of the tale. All this makes for an odd conglomeration with a story of a certain sinister slant - but still, overall 'The castle of the living dead' is well done and entertaining, if not a major must-see.
The issues with tone and storytelling strength here are not so severe in and of themselves, though between the two this isn't as robustly engaging as it could be; I readily admit I passed out for a bit in the middle of watching. Filmmaker Warren Kiefer penned a deviously dark narrative, however, with flavorful scene writing. Kiefer furthermore illustrates skills of shot composition to make the most of the grand filming location, and sufficient command and grasp of the medium as director to exploit any given moment for meaningful tension and grim tidings (if falling short of the utmost). The cast are committed and mostly give admirable performances, with Gaia Germani quite standing out as Laura; Lee invariably commands an imposing presence; it's as the witch, of all roles, that Sutherland shines the most here. And in all regards the crew turned in fine work, including not just that art direction but also costume design, hair, and makeup. All this is to say nothing of Aldo Tonti's crisp, vivid cinematography that so ably captures every rich detail there is to see.
Suffice to say that 'The castle of the living dead' is no great peak of horror, and it will meet with more favor with some than with others. It remains a good time much more than not, however, and I appreciate the work that everyone put into it. Even if you're a big fan of someone involved I don't believe this is anything one needs to go out of their way to see, but if you do have the opportunity to watch there's much to enjoy in these ninety minutes.
Initial exposition is a smidgen scattered, gelling only as the characters approach the primary setting, that lovely castle where the imaginative art direction can truly take over. I don't think it's unfair to argue that the storytelling is also a smidgen scattered generally, though, bouncing back and forth a little; in addition, this carries itself with a tone that's less than perfectly serious, and I further believe this to be an instance where the small size of the chief cast, set against the large surroundings, only serves to accentuate the artificiality of the presentation. Young Christopher Lee, seemingly doing his best impression of the theatricality of Vincent Price is a somewhat odd sight, but welcome; young Donald Sutherland, fulfilling a few small roles, carries himself with a mirth rather unbecoming the nature of the tale. All this makes for an odd conglomeration with a story of a certain sinister slant - but still, overall 'The castle of the living dead' is well done and entertaining, if not a major must-see.
The issues with tone and storytelling strength here are not so severe in and of themselves, though between the two this isn't as robustly engaging as it could be; I readily admit I passed out for a bit in the middle of watching. Filmmaker Warren Kiefer penned a deviously dark narrative, however, with flavorful scene writing. Kiefer furthermore illustrates skills of shot composition to make the most of the grand filming location, and sufficient command and grasp of the medium as director to exploit any given moment for meaningful tension and grim tidings (if falling short of the utmost). The cast are committed and mostly give admirable performances, with Gaia Germani quite standing out as Laura; Lee invariably commands an imposing presence; it's as the witch, of all roles, that Sutherland shines the most here. And in all regards the crew turned in fine work, including not just that art direction but also costume design, hair, and makeup. All this is to say nothing of Aldo Tonti's crisp, vivid cinematography that so ably captures every rich detail there is to see.
Suffice to say that 'The castle of the living dead' is no great peak of horror, and it will meet with more favor with some than with others. It remains a good time much more than not, however, and I appreciate the work that everyone put into it. Even if you're a big fan of someone involved I don't believe this is anything one needs to go out of their way to see, but if you do have the opportunity to watch there's much to enjoy in these ninety minutes.
He was a thief and a degenerate! It was perfectly reasonable that I should use him in my work!
sol-kay1 February 2008
Warning: Spoilers
**SPOILERS** During the hectic times in Central Europe just after the defeat of Napoleon at Waterloo this troupe of Gypsy entertainers doing a hang man act are invited to preform at Count Dargo's Castle with a hefty three pieces of gold bullion as a reward for their effort.
Accepting the Count's invitation the entertainers are unaware that he's more interested in their bodies then their talents. In fact one of the Gypsy, who was thrown out of the ensemble for fighting, Dart is later grabbed by the Count's faithful servant Sando who had him mummified with this potion, secreted from an exotic flower, that the Count picked up in the Orient.
The Count is in the process of creating his own wax museum by freezing, with the extract of his magic flower, in place not only animals, like birds cats and dogs, but humans. The Count plans to have the entire troupe made into members of the living dead, like his wife, and stay with him in his castle, as a byproduct of his evil genius, forever!
After mummifying Dart together with the hangman of the troupe Bruno, who in fact really and mistakingly hung himself, Count Dargo becomes very interested in the late Bruno's sister Laura whom he developed the hots for. Wanting to get Laura to take a dose of his magic extract, the Oriental flowers mummifying powers, has Laura run like hell from the crazed Count with his servant Sandro in hot pursuit.
Sandro had earlier had Laura's lover, who replaced her late brother Bruno as the hanged man, Eric knocked out and put on ice in the Count's laboratory to be turned into his latest stiff. It turned out that the midget, Nick, of the group not only came to Eric's rescue but also saved Laura from being turned into a human statue by the deranged Count Drago.
Sandro chasing Nick all over the castle grounds ends up getting blasted by him, with a pistol, after he thought that he did him him. Nick was thrown from the castle wall by Sandro only to land on a haystack that both broke his fall and prevented Nick form breaking his neck. Running into an old women who it turned out was the Count's first victim Nick gets the lowdown to what the crazed Count is really up to. With the help of the local police, lead by the goofy Sgt.Paul, Nick together with Eric finally put an end to Count Dargo's reign of terror.
In the end the Count got a whiff of his own medicine, or his exotic flower's deadly extract, and became the latest as well as last member of his macabre experiment in the suspended animation of eternal life; The Castle of the Living Dead!
Accepting the Count's invitation the entertainers are unaware that he's more interested in their bodies then their talents. In fact one of the Gypsy, who was thrown out of the ensemble for fighting, Dart is later grabbed by the Count's faithful servant Sando who had him mummified with this potion, secreted from an exotic flower, that the Count picked up in the Orient.
The Count is in the process of creating his own wax museum by freezing, with the extract of his magic flower, in place not only animals, like birds cats and dogs, but humans. The Count plans to have the entire troupe made into members of the living dead, like his wife, and stay with him in his castle, as a byproduct of his evil genius, forever!
After mummifying Dart together with the hangman of the troupe Bruno, who in fact really and mistakingly hung himself, Count Dargo becomes very interested in the late Bruno's sister Laura whom he developed the hots for. Wanting to get Laura to take a dose of his magic extract, the Oriental flowers mummifying powers, has Laura run like hell from the crazed Count with his servant Sandro in hot pursuit.
Sandro had earlier had Laura's lover, who replaced her late brother Bruno as the hanged man, Eric knocked out and put on ice in the Count's laboratory to be turned into his latest stiff. It turned out that the midget, Nick, of the group not only came to Eric's rescue but also saved Laura from being turned into a human statue by the deranged Count Drago.
Sandro chasing Nick all over the castle grounds ends up getting blasted by him, with a pistol, after he thought that he did him him. Nick was thrown from the castle wall by Sandro only to land on a haystack that both broke his fall and prevented Nick form breaking his neck. Running into an old women who it turned out was the Count's first victim Nick gets the lowdown to what the crazed Count is really up to. With the help of the local police, lead by the goofy Sgt.Paul, Nick together with Eric finally put an end to Count Dargo's reign of terror.
In the end the Count got a whiff of his own medicine, or his exotic flower's deadly extract, and became the latest as well as last member of his macabre experiment in the suspended animation of eternal life; The Castle of the Living Dead!
Okay but rather forgettable old classic
Hayden-860551 January 2021
Rather unheard of film starring Christopher Lee and a young Donald Sutherland in his first feature film role. The acting is okay, it's nice to see Lee in a large talking role but the rest of the actors, who are dubbed I think aren't the best.
Plot wise it's the usual, travellers go to old castle, they get warned it's an evil place beforehand but don't listen, quite cliché. Christopher Lee's character, Count Drago is rather uninventive and doesn't have as many distinguishable features or villainous traits as I would have liked.
5/10: An ok film, interesting to see Sutherland in his first role and great to see Christopher Lee. But there's not much on offer here.
Plot wise it's the usual, travellers go to old castle, they get warned it's an evil place beforehand but don't listen, quite cliché. Christopher Lee's character, Count Drago is rather uninventive and doesn't have as many distinguishable features or villainous traits as I would have liked.
5/10: An ok film, interesting to see Sutherland in his first role and great to see Christopher Lee. But there's not much on offer here.
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
