Los 300 héroes

I saw this movie when it first came out in 1962, I believe, when I was just a kid and it is still one of my favorite movies of all time. As I got older there were a few mistakes in it that I noticed. One was, someone in the movie said that the Spartans fight like Machines. I don't think that the word machines or machines in general were invented then. I could be wrong though. A few other flaws but in my judgement it is one the finest army action fighting movies.Reading history books about the Persian wars it seems quite accurate.

What is it about the tale of 300 Spartans holding off the whole of the Persian army that haunts us still?

At some point they'll make the great version of this story, until that day comes this film will do nicely.

The plot has the 300 Spartans going off with a small band of other Greeks to perform a delaying action in a narrow pass against the vastly superior Persian Army. They delay the Persians for several days before a final and terrible battle that assured them their place in history.

The battle scenes are wonderful, as is pretty much everything in this film. The problem is that they've shoehorned a love story into this testosterone charge film to the point it distracts from the rest of the film, it just doesn't belong. Actually most of the early part of the film, before the troops move out is rather soapy. However once the troops march the film picks up, and other than the damned romance is fine film.

See this movie. Forgive the soap and you'll have a rousing good time.

8 out of 10.

This was one of the last of the great sword-and-sandal epics. Unlike many before it or since, it managed to get the facts generally correct. The story, recorded in Herodotus, concerns a small band of troops from Sparta who held off the advance of the Persian army in the 5th century B.C. In doing so, they gave their fellow Greeks time to organise a larger army. Themes include: democracy vs. despotism, and sacrifice for the sake of the common good. Ever stoic Richard Egan (star of "Pollyanna," "Esther and the King," and other fun films) does a great job of projecting the inner strength of Spartan leader Leonidas. This film is not to be missed and ranks with other memorable epics of the 1960s, such as "The Long Ships". Note: this is newly remastered and should not be confused with the botched version released some months prior.

• Persia: "Our arrows will blot out the sun!"

• Sparta: "Good! Then we will fight in the shade..."

With these famous lines from the movie THE 300 SPARTANS, I decided to begin my comment since the words best resemble what clash really took place a long time ago at Thermopylae - one of the most known and captivating battles in history when a mere wave of a few free men dared say "NO" to the ocean of "immortal" Asian hoards. But there are other, more important words that immediately direct our attention on the right track:

"Oh, Stranger, tell the Spartans that we lie here obedient to their word."

For centuries, the sublime words written at Thermopylae addressed to a stranger, anyone who is passing by have touched people. Artists drew paintings, writers wrote stories, and, in 1962 Rudolph Mate used perhaps the most powerful medium of our times, cinema. At the heyday of epic movies, he made THE 300 SPARTANS keeping to all significant "commandments" of a spectacle but also maintaining other important cases that have been noticed in time.

It's true that THE 300 SPARTANS is a visually stunning spectacle. But it is very important to mention that this film, besides the lavish sets, costumes, magnificent crowd scenes made in accordance with the spirit of a colossal movie, is a very captivating and absorbing insight into the historical characters. King Leonidas (Richard Egan) also carries human responsibilities, has a wife whom he loves, owns a very balanced view of his people, is aware of strengths and weaknesses, knows the lack of loyalty, the bitterness of treason but despite all of these, he is equally ready to return on the shield or with it for his people, for Sparta. Phylon (Barry Coe) is a simple Spartan soldier who is, for the time being, deprived of honor to join the army. Although he loves his beautiful woman Ellas (Diane Baker), he is ready to march a huge distance to become one of those who fight. Being granted the right to defend his country is of ultimate importance to him, that's how he was brought up, that's what he has been living for. The family shame (his father's treason) is something he has to cope with for long but individual effort and straightforward desire make him worthy dying for ideals at last. Therefore, we can as well state that THE 300 SPARTANS differs from the latest movie 300 exactly in that character development - the characters here are not only strong men who only fight well and are directed towards dining in hell but human beings with the feelings that they are bound to control, psychological strength that they must retain, and ideals that they live and die for.

The performances are absolutely terrific though some people may not appear to be cast well to their parts. Richard Egan is marvelous as Leonidas. He has that nobility in his manners and that undeniable courage which Leonidas must have had. His best moments include the final sequence when he talks to his men: We must fulfill our duty so that Sparta can be free. Ralph Richardson is very appealing as Themistocles, a remarkable diplomat for whom truth is a heady wine and according to whom there are no hopeless wars but only hopeless cowards. Barry Coe, in spite of his youthful face and gentle manners, does a fine job as persistent Phylon. And David Farrar as Xerxes...here opinions may differ, even more intensely in the latest year when we have seen Rodrigo Santoro in this role. Despite possible comparison, one thing is true, Farrar is too old and through his acting, he rather reminds me of some experienced, tired, and not a very convincing ruler than the exotic, vital, desirous of power and honors master of Persia. Moreover, the pair of Xerxes and Artemisa (Anne Wakefield) makes it all a bit humorous. Yet, I leave that open to everyone's view.

Another factor, except for character development, that goes outside the rules of a spectacle are powerful moments and script. They make THE 300 SPARTANS more similar to SPARTACUS than THE TEN COMMANDMENTS. The absolutely memorable conversation of Leonidas and Hydarnes (Donald Houston) I entailed at the beginning became a symbol of the movie in years. Another brilliant moment is at the cottage of a mountaineer: "Gods create beautiful women and later transform them into wives." Moreover, except for many other terrific script moments, Xerxes is showed at the beginning on his throne saying memorably "At Marathon, my father sent a mere wave, now I lead an ocean." The final scene, though a bit too short, has an unforgettable feeling that can hardly be expressed: the shields kill all Spartans but they are not afraid, they are with their king. I usually reflected on the fact what really made those Spartans immortal in history: was it their tragic end or the absolute loyalty and obedience that they retained to the last breath?

THE 300 SPARTANS is a must see not only for history buffs but for all viewers. The film is made in an accurate way, constitutes a nice history lesson that also talks to modern times and explains much from human ideals universal throughout the world history. It's a captivating story of courage, loyalty, ideals protection and death in dignity. No wonder why this is the film which also moved Frank Miller in his youth and prompted him to write a graphic novel and finally to make a movie.

Indeed, it was the time when an oasis of free patriots clashed with the desert of warriors in captivity and the oasis won in human hearts. 8/10

I was a teenager when I first saw this film. I was raised on the ancient spectacle films of the 50's and 60's and feel this one holds up quite well. No, it's not perfection with respect to history. The Spartans were hardly democratic or benevolent. But, they were fiercely proud, great warriors and very independent. The film does a fine job choreographing the 2-3 day battle, given the budget and FX limitations of the early 60's. Very similar to "Helen of Troy" in these respects. Richard Egan was excellent as Leonidas but the script was very limiting for him and the rest of the cast. I will look forward to seeing the film that results from Steven Pressfield's "Gates of Fire". Hopefully 40+ years of technology will create a true epic, as befitting an action (unknown to most school kids today) that helped preserve and push Western Civilization.