A Hatful of Rain (1957) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
37 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Frankie Five Angels....
ween-310 January 2004
Ah...the wealth of info that this website provides...never knew that our old pal Michael Gazzo wrote this play/screenplay...another piece of "Godfather" trivia I can now pepper my pals with....

And William Hickey's voice was a marvel of genetic engineering even back in his debut film...

"Hatful" may appear somewhat dated by today's standards and the direction and performances still seem more stage than film-oriented..but love seeing the old Brooklyn waterfront and those ESSO gas signs again...and the cast puts in a fine day's work...

If you liked this one...put "The Lost Weekend", "Man With The Golden Arm" and "Days of Wine and Roses" on the to-do list for comparison shopping purposes.

(And for you Tony Franciosa fans out there...you can now turn your attention to line 2 of Tom Waits' "Goin' Out West").....
19 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Dated and somewhat corny, but still entertaining
helpless_dancer30 January 2004
Good drama showing how a family can be far different than what it appears when certain members refuse to live in the present. Nolan was good as the bantam rooster of a father and Franciosa shone as the drunken yet solid older brother. As always Silva, with that cruel face, was well cast as a heartless pusher whose love for money can only lead to disaster. I wanted to slap his hyper little helper; what a creep.
19 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Moving, hard-hitting, tender when it needs to be, and well-acted...
moonspinner5513 July 2008
An ex-soldier/now unemployed junkie in New York City keeps his addiction secret from his pregnant wife and his visiting father; his adoring brother acts as an enabler, and eventually things come to a boil when the guy needs a hit and can't scrape together the twenty dollars to get himself through the night. Playwright Michael V. Gazzo made a big splash with this story on the stage; he's also credited with work on the adaptation, yet the only fault of the film is the dialogue. The back-and-forth conversations between the addict and his wife or the addict and his father don't really ring true (the words are theatrical, as is the phrasing given by the actors). The brother, portrayed by Oscar-nominee Anthony Franciosa (reprising his Broadway performance), spends far too much of the first act drunk--in that movie-version of inebriated (stumbling, laughing, fiddling with his clothes, saying, "I'm drunk! I'm drunk!"). Still, Franciosa gets a good rhythm going with Lloyd Nolan as his father and Don Murray as his brother, although Nolan and Murray don't fare as well when they're on their own. Murray tries hard in the showiest part, and several of his big scenes are effective, but he's too clean, too dry and smooth to really convey the lows of a doper on the edge. Eva Marie Saint has the most under-developed role playing Murray's wife, yet she conveys the polite frustration of this woman with ease (which is often times harder than pulling out all the stops). Nice locations and gritty black-and-white cinematography help tremendously, and the picture is quite moving once the preliminaries are out of the way. **1/2 from ****
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A film ahead of it's time.
Jay0910195130 October 2003
Back in the 1950's, it was not normal to see a movie that addressed a social problem such as Heroin addiction. The film also slightly implicates the US Army as the source of Johnny's addiction when he was in the Army Hospital following spending months in a cave in Korea. The film pulls no punches as it displays the ruthless pushers who will "put you in the hospital with Willie DeCarlo" if you don't pay what you owe for the Heroin. It also shows how addicts will do anything to get their next "fix". One really feels for Johnny's brother Polo who works as a bouncer to get money for Johnny's habit and at the same time trying to hide the fact that his brother is an addict from Johnny's wife and thier father. In addition, as one who grew up in a NYC housing project in the 1950's and 60's i have to say the on location filming in the projects brings back lots of memories of what my project looked like. I am happy to say i have a good VHS version of the film i took off the OLD AMC years ago (before they ruined AMC with commercials.)
34 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Hatful of Rain is Only Half Full
JLRMovieReviews17 April 2013
I saw A Hatful of Rain and Bigger Than Life in the same evening, because they seemed to make the perfect double feature as they both dealt with addictions. (They had been on my short list of movies to see for a while.) I watched A Hatful of Rain first. It features good actors, who give good, thoughtful performances, but the film, on the whole, felt a little too stagy and like it was trying too hard to be self-important and/or preachy with its family dynamics. While it's rather respectful and tender in depicting Don Murray's morphine addiction and Eva Marie Saint's predicament in loving someone she can't altogether help, you begin to tire of its downbeat feel. Tony Franciosa is good as his brother who is tired of helping him out every single time and, at the same time, finds himself attracted to his wife. One may say that comparing this film to Bigger Than Life is not fair to this one, as I found it to be far superior to this, but, if you only have two hours to spare, watch Bigger Than Life first. Then, five minutes into this, you will see a world of difference, as A Hatful of Rain tries to be bigger than life.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
a game of horse
RanchoTuVu26 December 2008
A Korean war veteran (Don Murray) has developed a raging heroin habit which he hides from his pregnant wife (Eva Marie Saint)and his father (Lloyd Nolan). He has those classic "I've got a monkey on my back" mannerisms which the audience can appreciate, while the wife and father wonder why he seems nervous all the time. His dealer, a character known as Mother, played by Henry Silva, and Mother's sidekick, a beatnik type known as Chuch, played by Gerald S. O Laughlin, are memorable characters. Murray is great as his desperation grows, in debt to Mother, trying to keep his problem a secret, pushed to the extreme. The powerhouse drama features an utterly fantastic role, played by Anthony Franciosa, as Murray's heavy drinking brother, who protects Murray but is in love with his wife at the same time. It could have all been too stagey, but thanks to director Fred Zinneman, there's action to spare in this gritty New York drama.
25 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Still packs a wallop!
JohnHowardReid17 June 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Copyright 1957 by 20th Century-Fox Film Corp. New York opening at the Victoria: 17 July 1957. U.S. release: 14 June 1957. U.K. release: 17 November 1957. Australian release: 12 September 1957. Sydney opening at the Esquire. 9,572 feet or 106 minutes in the U.K. 109 minutes in the U.S. and Australia.

SYNOPSIS: Don Murray plays the "junkie" who is very much in love with his pregnant wife, Miss Saint. But always there are the savage demands of his addiction which turn him into a creature at once pathetic and hateful. Living in the same apartment with husband and wife is Franciosa, brother and protector of Murray. To appease his brother's sick thirst for the drug Franciosa has provided money and made sacrifices. Finally Franciosa has no more money to give and the growing plight explodes over Murray's head. His wife, thinking his furtive disappearances signify another woman, plans to leave him. In addition, a trio of creeps, superbly characterized by Henry Silva, Gerald O'Loughlin and William Hickey, close in sadistically on Murray for payment of the drugs.

NOTES: Tony Franciosa was nominated for an Academy Award for Best Actor, losing to Alec Guinness in The Bridge on the River Kwai. The stage play by Michael Vincente Gazzo opened on Broadway at the Lyceum on 9 November 1955, running (at least to my mind) an amazingly successful 398 performances. Franciosa was the star, but Ben Gazzara played the junkie, Shelley Winters the wife and Frank Silvera the thick-headed father. Henry Silva was "Mother", his associates Harry Guardino (in his Broadway debut) and Paul Richards. Because of other commitments (no-one had expected the play would run so long), Ben Gazzara was forced to leave during the run, being replaced by Steve McQueen (also making his Broadway debut). The play was such a huge success, Fox had to fork out $250,000 just to buy the screen rights.

comment: When this film was made, the subject of dope addiction had just been removed from the banned list on the Production code; and it was considered very daring and controversial and very up-to-date to make such a film — especially when the film was backed by the prestige and production team of a major studio. Of course, the subject had to be treated in "good taste" — a dictum that has certainly put the damper on any imaginative, courageous, controversial or really insightful handling here. In fact Zinnemann seems to have stepped as far back as the Pyramids to avoid giving the slightest offence or affront to anyone. Except for one solitary shot — Murray's tortured face seen through the slatted shadows of a venetian blind — the direction is stolidly unobtrusive. The players are often lined up across the screen as they would be on the stage. All our attention is firmly focused solely on the players and their dialogue. Fortunately, a lot of the acting can stand up to this sort of scrutiny (although Franciosa tends to over-act) and the dialogue has enough zing to keep the viewer reasonably engrossed. Some attempts have been made to open out the playscript, but the bulk of the action still takes place in the cramped quarters of the original stage setting.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
I first saw this movie at the age of eleven
mkosko14 August 2001
My first viewing of this movie was when i was eleven years old. It was being aired on the Friday night late show. I found it to be a gripping tale of a Korean war veteran returning home with a heroin addiction which was brought on from battle wounds recieved during the conflict.After that point was established you tend to feel for Johnny Pope and his family. A hero in his fathers eyes with his brother Polo paling in comparison in dads opinion. Johnny's wife and brother do everything they can to cope with his addiction and keep John Sr. in the dark about it building to the eventual climax when the truth comes out.A well written and acted tale that left an impression on me.
22 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Medically and sociologically accurate, as they say, but a depressing watch for non-junkies.
SAMTHEBESTEST3 April 2023
A Hatful Of Rain (1957) : Brief Review -

Medically and sociologically accurate, as they say, but a depressing watch for non-junkies. Don Murray is more powerful than morphine. Fred Zinnemann's cinema has sometimes left me stunned, and for the right reasons, but I had never expected him to make a film on a druggie and leave my nerves shaking. I don't know about others, but for someone like me who doesn't touch a drop of alcohol, cigarettes, or tobacco-forget drugs-A Hatful of Rain is a depressing watch. It is a hateful film, I must say. Why would someone enjoy watching things on a screen that they don't like to do in real life? For others, especially addictive ones, this might be a lesson, but I am not gonna speak on their behalf. When I saw "Requiem For a Dream," I was stunned and shattered, not because of the horrible consequences of drug addiction but because the film explored those scary visuals in a mind-shaking manner. A Hatful of Rain is not that dangerous, but yes, it does leave you shattered for a moment or so, especially the ending note. Speaking about the impact it created at the time of its release, the frank depiction of drug addiction was so rare that people started noticing physical changes in their own family members for a while. People also call it a medically and sociologically accurate account of the effects of morphine on an addict and his family. The performance of Don Murray will leave you stunned, if not the film. He is phenomenal, outstanding, and unbelievable! Eva Marie Saint as Celia is fantastic too. You can't expect a female character to be so disturbed, unhappy, stable, and yet strong at the same time, and what a knockout Eva was here. The other two fellas, Anthony Franciosa and Lloyd Nolan, add their brilliant support to leave you in awe. Fred Zinnemann has better films, but this was a gutsy one. So, it's fairly watchable.

RATING - 6/10*

By - #samthebestest.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Terrific Drama
dga111057 April 2006
I check at least once a month to see if this fabulous film has finally been released on video. Just like the way that "Days of Wine and Roses" tackled the subject of alcohol addiction, this film tackled the subject of drug addiction like none other before or since. Terrific performances by all, especially Don Murray and Anthony Franciosa as the two brothers, each held to a different standard by a overbearing father played by Lloyd Nolan. There is also an appearance by a very young William Hickey of "Prizzi's Honor" fame in one of his first roles. This film is a window back in time to life in New York City in the 50's. I urge whoever owns the rights to this film, please release it on DVD
26 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Depressingly realistic
mls418222 June 2020
I have had relatives addicted to street drugs. As this film shows, overdose is the least of your worries. Addicts not only throw their own lives away, they drag their loved ones down with them. They not only destroy the love you have for them but they endanger your life along with theirs. They make the character more sympathetic by being a veteran with PTSD. This film should be shown in all schools starting in third grade. Although realistic it is still more sanitized that reality.
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Way too dated
deexsocalygal22 July 2020
Warning: Spoilers
As a recovering Heroin addict I was disappointed with the ending. The movie ends with the addict husband shivering in bed kicking & the wife picking up the phone & saying "Give me the police. I want to report a drug addict." THE END! How ridiculous. Why not have it end realistically with him being put in a hospital or detox center? The story is about a tortured & now permanently injured war vet who was released from the VA with a morphine addiction. He goes home to his wife with an injured back & nothing for pain to try to live a normal life. He turns to heroin for relief just like people do now. (especially with the so called political "opoid epidemic" which has only tied doctors hands & made it next to impossible to get prescriptions for pain) He is ashamed & hides his problem from his wife for years. The movie ends with him finally coming clean & admitting his drug problem to his wife. He's miserable & decides to kick at home & even tells his drug dealers to leave. He lays in bed shivering, kicking, twitching, sweating & a handkerchief stuffed in his mouth to stifle his screams. What does his wife do to support him in his recovery? She picks up the phone & calls the police! THE END! What? Even in 1957 the police wouldn't come & take an injuried drug addicted war vet -who hasn't committed any crimes- from his bed at home to jail! They should have had it end with him going to a doctor or a rehab clinic to get help kicking.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Another great movie not available on video
gelashe4 August 2003
Warning: Spoilers
Here is another movie I taped years ago on AMC that is not available on VHS or DVD. Filmed on location in the Alfred Smith housing projects near the South Street Seaport, it is great to see what the area looked like in the 50's.

Check out young William Hickey (have another cookie my dear?) in the jazz club as a "hep cat" snapping his fingers. Lloyd Nolan is great as Johnny's dad coming for a visit to see his "favorite son" and daughter-in-law. Johnny can do no wrong, but Polo who takes the blame for everything can do no right. We wait for Johnny or Polo to tell Dad the truth throughout the whole movie.

The other great character is "Mother" the drug pusher who has William Hickey as his sidekick. Mother is a ruthless businessman who preys on the weakness of his junkie clients and has no problem when it comes to collecting the money that he knows they don't have.

Lloyd Nolan, reminiscing about Johnny as a boy, tells a story about him doing something giving us the best line "All he ever got was A Hatful of Rain".

Very daring for its time, the last line is my favorite when Eva Marie Saint says "Hello Police, I want to report a drug addict, it's my husband".
20 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A great BW fifties movie about Heroin Addiction.
denscul11 October 2000
My summary might scare off some, but this is not the infamous "Reefer" movies of earlier days. This film has a great cast, who work with a great script. Don Murray plays an unlikely addict because he acquired his habit as a wounded soldier. His addiction and effects on himself and family are the plot focus. The actors draw out our pity and condemnations. The film does not preach about addiction. The film does portray an ugly problem about drugs, be they legal or illegal. My generation which came to age in the 60's saw many films which showed the "fun" side of getting smashed or high. A great number of them are no longer living, or are shadows of themselves because of addiction.
36 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Incredibly gritty...
planktonrules23 October 2011
Warning: Spoilers
"A Hatful of Rain" is a film indicative of the realism that had crept into films in the 1950s. The Production Code had gradually relaxed and films dealing with more adult topics were becoming more and more available. Now this is NOT saying the films were dirty or salacious--they just dealt with some of the realities of the pitfalls of modern life. Gangs, drugs and even sexual abuse were now possible topics in films--provided they were presented in a reasonably restrained manner. In this climate, a film like this one is possible--back in the 1940s it simply never could have been made.

The film originally was a Broadway play and it depicts the effects of morphine addiction on a Korean War vet (Don Murray). Instead of admitting his problem, Murray gets pulled into the seedy underworld--as he's heavily in debt to a scum-bag pusher (Henry Silva) and it appears as if he has no choice but steal to support this habit. In the meantime, his patient wife (Eva Marie Saint) is lonely and assumes that her husband is cheating on her--after all, he's distant and often gone at night. Living with them is Murray's brother (Anthony Franciosa)--and this creates some sexual tension and an interesting dynamic considering how lonely his sister-in-law is and that Franciosa knows his brother's secret. Add to that the tough as nails father (Lloyd Nolan) who comes to visit and you've got the ingredients for some fireworks. The family's problems extend well beyond the chemical dependency--and perhaps the drugs in some way relate to all this dysfunction. How all this is sorted out is for you to see for yourself in this excellent drama.

Don Murray is hardly a household name, but he was very good in this role because he seems a lot like an ordinary guy--something that really helps in a film like this. A big-name star would have been all wrong for this role as a poor working stiff. As for the rest of the cast, they are all excellent as well. Saint is a lot like other characters she's played--such as in "On the Waterfront" and Franciosa received an Oscar nomination for his performance as the brother living with them.

By the way, although the main focus is on Murray, I think the relationship between the scapegoated brother (Franciosa) and the irresponsible father is probably the most interesting one in the picture. There sure is a lot going on here.

Overall, an extremely well made movie that it filled with interesting family dynamics. In fact, there's so much to see here--the co-dependent wife, the enabling brother, the emotionally abusive and neglectful father...all which is fascinating and worth your time. Exceptional.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A very moving film. Waiting for DVD.
rthayer-16 July 2006
I saw this play-turned-film many years ago on late-night TV and have been wanting a copy for my collection. I miss that late-night discovery of motion picture history from my bed that I received back in my high-school days, when I'd watch whatever was on because they seemed to care to show good stuff on my local station and there was always something I'd never seen. I'd remembered Eva Marie Saint from "On The Waterfront", but she just blew me away in this film. And Tony Franciosa I new from TV. Was it "The Name of the Game"? Anyway, he was great in this film, as he was in "A Face in the Crowd". I wish more people remembered him. Don Murray was also very good. These were all actors hard at work with a great script. It has one of the most moving endings I've ever seen. Where's my DVD?
21 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
best film ever
sventimiglia2358227 October 2000
written in perfect form and directed the same. as for the acting well don murray turns in the best performance of his career. eva marie saint and lloyd nolan are in top form and henry silva is excellent as mother. anthony franciosa steals the show with possibly the best performance in a motion picture. this film is so good it should be made available on video and never be taken out of print. it is one of those as perfect as film can be movies. if you get the chance to see it don't pass it by for anything.
22 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
stagy
dartleyk19 August 2012
dated, cornball, but with truths still to be told; that's the plus side; the negative is don murray who can single handedly wreck any movie; the standard ploy? look as though it's difficult, almost painful to say what you're about to say; in this movie he does it to death, but also in bus stop which could have been a hoot; and it's only cagney's overwhelming performance in shake hands with the devil to keep this one-note guy from wrecking that otherwise brilliant flick; no, i never met the guy, don';t have any reason to dislike the guy, but in his movies you are constantly reminded that one of the charters is trying to act here; overall a tired subject nicely shot but you will be tempted to find something else in the fridge whenever murray tries to take charge
1 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Pope Family Values
bkoganbing18 January 2010
The average fan will know Michael V. Gazzo far better for his career role as Frankie Pantangeli in The Godfather Part 2, but he was so much more than a film gangster. He was an acting teacher of some renown and a writer. This multi-talented man penned A Hatful Of Rain and it ran for 398 performances during the 1955-56 season on Broadway.

Two of the players repeated their roles from Broadway, Anthony Franciosa as Polo Pope for which he won a Best Actor nomination to go with the Tony Award nomination he got for Broadway. And as the murderous drug dealer Mother, Henry Silva came over from the East Coast as well.

On what should be a happy occasion Lloyd Nolan as father to Franciosa and younger son Don Murray is up from Florida where he's coming to collect on a promise of money from Franciosa. The nest egg that Tony was sitting on is now gone. Little does Nolan dream that the money is being poured into Murray's veins. Murray his beloved younger son and war hero from Korea came home as did so many others a drug addict, hooked on morphine.

As we watch the film, bit by bit the Pope family secrets come out. The boys did not have much of a childhood, half the time they were foster care or orphanages as Nolan who was a widower just couldn't take care of them. In addition Franciosa who's bounced from dead end jobs one after another boards with Murray and wife Eva Marie Saint.

Because of his addiction Murray has been paying less and less attention to his wife and Eva Marie and Tony are finding a mutual attraction. On stage this played out in real life as Shelley Winters had the wife's part on stage. Franciosa and Winters wound up marrying.

A Hatful Of Rain was proof of further cracking of the Code because until The Man With The Golden Arm came out two years earlier, drug addiction was a forbidden subject unless it was covered in something like Reefer Madness. The post World War II film To The Ends Of The Earth that starred Dick Powell as a federal narcotics cop covered the law enforcement part of the story and other films followed that one. But addiction itself was forbidden. As Philip Marlowe in Murder My Sweet, Powell was also shot up with what was called 'hop' at the time, but I can't think of another film where the subject was broached.

In between A Hatful Of Rain and The Man With The Golden Arm was also Monkey On My Back, the true story of former welterweight champion Barney Ross who like Murray got addicted during recovery in a military hospital.

Although Don Murray does a fine acting job as John Pope, personally I would have much preferred to see Ben Gazzara who originated the part on Broadway. The film was shot on location in New York City and Gazzara is so much more an urban type than Murray.

The only recognition A Hatful Of Rain received from the Motion Picture Academy was Anthony Franciosa's nomination for Best Actor. He's always been a favorite of mine, he's never bad in anything he does. But sad to say that Tony ran up against The Bridge On The River Kwai. Usually a big budget film like that will always buck a small feature like A Hatful Of Rain. And Alec Guinness was not going to be denied that year.

A Hatful Of Rain though has stood the test of time. It could easily be done again today with the protagonist being a veteran of Iraq or Afghanistan. We may yet see that, but believe me this film will more than do until then.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Great movie great acting great stars
frankr31512 January 2008
For all you people who liked the film A Hatful of Rain you must get a copy of the play and read that also..It is brilliant. I taught the play for many years in my 12 grade English class. After we read it I would show the film. That film still holds up in many ways. I have noticed that that film plays often on Fox Movie Channel. Chance are you can catch it there if it is still not available to rent or purchase on DVD. All the actors in the film are perfect for their parts. Anthony Franciosa, Don Murray, Eva Marie Saint and Lloyd Nolan play their parts to perfection. Lloyd Nolan is VERY GOOD. His love for one son over the other over is played to the hilt. My students were most impressed with his performance. So will you.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Trapped
dougdoepke24 November 2008
Intense and harrowing family drama typical of 50's style New York film-making. At the time, Hollywood was caught up in the double-whammy of TV competition and Cold War scare, so programming from the West Coast tended to emphasize big screen spectacle and politically safe subject matter. On the other hand, films from New York City, such as On the Waterfront and Edge of the City, emphasized small screen black & white, with urban settings and grittier subject matter.

Here it's drug addiction among a white-collar family ensconced in a Manhattan apartment. Hooked because of a war wound, Johnny (Don Murray) has a loving wife Celia (Eva Marie Saint), a loyal brother Polo (Anthony Franciosa), and an arrogantly insensitive father (Lloyd Nolan). There's real tension between husband and wife because Johnny is fearful of confessing his secret addiction. As a result, Celia feels neglected by his drug-created absences, while Johnny keeps losing jobs, and Polo ends up paying for his brother's habit. When Dad comes from Florida to collect promised money from Polo that he now doesn't have, events begin spiraling out of control.

Needless to say, acting here is front and center stage. The cast comes through beautifully, especially Franciosa as the intensely conflicted Polo who's attracted to his brother's wife while providing Johnny the needed support. And it doesn't help that Dad has always favored Johnny even as Polo must keep that same brother's ruinous secret. Poor Polo, the stress may appear to be on Johnny and his addiction, but it's really Polo who's emotionally torn.

This is not a movie for the depressed. Nearly all the scenes take place in the couple's rather drab apartment, except for a few street shots of Johnny trapped by Manhattan's towering impersonality. This is urban despair 50's style, when drugs and addiction were considered a strictly urban problem related to unwholesome types that thrived there. The darker skinned drug-pusher Mother (Henry Silva)) conforms to a popular stereotype of the time, along with his be-bopping confederate Apple (Bill Hickey), another popular stereotype. And when Mother says it's only business after threatening Johnny, we get a different perspective on the rise of post-war commercialism. (Why the lugubrious name "Mother" for a low-life drug dealer? My guess is that it characterizes in ironic fashion the dependent relation addicts have with their supplier.)

The image that stays with me is a strung-out Johnny, hunkered down in his coat, drifting alone on the streets of Manhattan. It's a grim existential moment, especially for that upbeat decade. Anyway, the movie remains a dramatic powerhouse that still packs a wallop. And even that bane of 50's films, the required happy ending, is finessed in suitably ambiguous fashion.
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
fantastic movie and a must see for anyone interested in addiction
Snitz-13 April 2006
This is one of the first movies I saw about addiction and it is one of the best I have seen. Don Murray was fantastic as a addict and his brother played the part of the family saver well to. I have searched to get a print of this movie without success. this shows the seedy side of addiction. It also showed the impact a family member who is addicted to something has on his family in this case his wife thought there was another woman. There was the strong family feeling from this movie and the father was a overbearing perfectionist that really loved his family but had trouble showing it to both brothers which hurt the other brother big-time.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A Boatload of Angst
davidcarniglia30 August 2020
Warning: Spoilers
A hard-edged drama of heroin addiction, starring Don Murray, Eva Marie Saint, and Antonio Franciosa. Murray's the addict, Johnny; but he drags in and drags down every one who cares about him: wife Celia (Saint), brother Polo (Franciosa), and father, John, Sr. (Lloyd Nolan). Lurking literally, in the shadows are the reptilian drug dealer and his henchmen, Mother, Church, and Apples (Henry Silva, Gerald S. O'Loughlin, and William Hickey).

In addition, Polo's an alcoholic. It's no wonder, as, ironically, he's both the de facto fixer of the family, and the goat for everyone's failings. Dad thinks he's a chump for backing out of an investment scheme. Polo hides Johnny's problem for as long as possible (while enabling it by financing his habit, thus spending what he promised dad), and, most significantly, he undermines both Johnny and his wife by nurturing and affair with her.

The movie is therefore not just about drug addiction and the wide snare of horror that it casts. Although 1951's The Lost Weekend has a similar feel, in that Ray Milland's alcoholic character in that movie is falling apart in front of us, as Johnny is here; Milland is our point of view throughout. Though his family suffers from his addiction, the consequences are more indirect because Don (Milland) is seemingly alone on the 'wrong' side of life.

But in Hatful of Rain it's sometimes hard to tell who is more messed up between Johnny and Polo. Certainly, both Milland and Murray prowl the New York City night desperate and degraded. The major difference is that it doesn't take a load of goons to get fixed for alcohol. In fact, the bartender in Lost Weekend is the model of normality and basic decency.

Another major difference between these two addiction films is the (somewhat absurd) premise that Polo is the only one who knows what's wrong with Johnny, until very late in the game. Milland's Don, on the other hand, begins with a shaky rehab in progress, with his brother and fiancee hoping they can leave him to his own devices for that Lost Weekend.

In any case, because of the strange family dynamics, Johnny has to act like his brother isn't so bad for short-changing Pops; while Johnny, the good kid, comes off as a nice family man. Johnny does start to crumble and grumble to his dad; he's as disappointed in him as Polo. Apparently, although John, Sr., wants to think the three of them have "something special," it's more wishful thinking and bombast.

Dad has been emotionally distant. Still, it's clear that he cares about his sons; like everyone else here, he's basically a decent guy who's flawed. He's stuck in a rut of his own; and doesn't pick up on Johnny's fairly obvious hints about his habit.

The harrowing sequence in which Johnny nearly causes Polo to crash the car as they head to meet the pusher, and his subsequent hallucination when the hoods come to his apartment, is as disturbing as it is riveting. "I'll make good for it!" pleads Polo with Mother, so Johnny can get "straightened out" (i.e., fixed). Now Polo has to sell his car to keep the dope flowing--not to mention that Johnny will probably get beat up if his account isn't also 'fixed.'

Celia comes home to tell Johnny that she no longer loves him; of course, though, she's carrying their baby. This scene comes just as he's promised Polo that he's kicking the habit. "Don't do to me (ignore, reject) what I did to you!" Johnny implores of her. They tentatively make up. Now she brushes off Polo when he comes in; she thinks that the two guys are talking about her, when they're in fact talking about the dope.

This scene plays out with great feeling. Johnny confesses to Celia that he's a junkie. Dad, oblivious as always, arrives. The last bit of this long denouement is for dad to discover the secret. "Ok, I'll play straight man. What's going on here?" Johnny tells him. Celia and John, Sr. react in predictable ways: Celia accepts it calmly, but figures that they can deal with it; Johnny's dad carries on about it. He tells Celia "You've been sleeping with a dope addict?" Good point.

They regroup when Celia has to go to the doctor to check on the baby. Once again, Polo takes all the heat from dad; it's as though it's Polo's fault about Johnny. Waiting for him when he gets home are the creeps: he pays or gets clubbed. Luckily, Polo arrives just in time to pay Mother off. Of course the hoods don't believe him when he says he's done with the stuff.

When dad and Celia get back, she wants to get him in rehab right away; dad and Polo don't think so, even dad tries to minimize it. She fundamentally concerned because of a slight chance that the baby could be affected by drugs (very progressive thinking for the era to mention this). She gets her way, calling the police to get him committed to a rehab program (probably not as smooth as it sounds). The end.

Hatful of Rain is full of great character studies: Johnny, Polo, and their dad are very different, finely nuanced people; they have just enough in common to keep them together. Celia is not given much to do but put up with all of these guys; it's a bad pun, but Saint gives another of her saintly performances.

Maybe too much so; thanks to the script, it seems a bit incredible that she's clueless about Johnny's addiction. She's the one most involved in his life, obviously, and she's the one to take control ultimately. But that intervention, which makes complete sense, leads to such an abrupt ending that it seems too easy.

With those couple of reservations, this is a gripping story. The loose-cannon hoods add so much to the tense atmosphere; they're like the monsters under the bed, nightmarish, and mockingly comical. The message is so well layed-out that it's painful to watch. 9/10
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Haunted by his nightmarish drug addiction
jarrodmcdonald-11 March 2014
Warning: Spoilers
The plot is almost razor-thin (a couple is haunted by his nightmarish drug addiction) and focuses more on the relationships that involve the main characters and those in their orbit. But Michael Gazzo's story is very engagingly done, because although it feels slow in the first thirty minutes, you become gradually absorbed into their problems (which cover more than just the drug use).

What impressed me most was the casting of Lloyd Nolan as the ineffectual father. The casting works very nicely, because Nolan uses more of an 'old-school' style of Hollywood film acting; and this, juxtaposed against the hardline method turn by Don Murray and Anthony Franciosa who play his embittered sons makes the contrast and generational gap between them all the more noticeable.

Eva Marie Saint appears as the only female in this mêlée of simmering emotions, taking over from Shelley Winters who did the stage version (Winters was married to Franciosa). As much as I like Saint and can see how Fox would have considered her more glamorous movie star material, I think it might have been edgier with Winters who probably nailed the character's working class origins.

I have not seen the stage version or read the play, but I think anyone seeing the film for the first time can guess where director Fred Zinnemann has taken a few cinematic liberties with the story. There are some brief moments where we cut away to Don Murray's character wandering the street, struggling with the thought of robbing a kind old woman so he can afford a quick fix from his dope dealers. The way these exterior scenes are filmed at night provide a sense of foreboding and increase the film's overall moodiness.

The best scenes occur at the end when Murray comes out of the closet about his addiction. There is a memorable dinner scene where he admits he's a junkie to the father, and for the first time, dear old pop realizes that the brother (Franciosa) has been in on the secret the whole time. I don't think the wife's reactions are exactly right-- she was supposed to have been in the dark about the root of her crumbling marriage, thinking there was another woman, but Saint plays it almost too reassuringly, as if it's no big deal and would you please pass the stew.

The ending, where they do a group intervention is truly riveting drama. I can only imagine what it was like on stage, where the intimacy of the theatre brings the audience and performers that much closer together. It's harrowing to say the least. But there is a sense of satisfaction (and relief) that Nolan's deadbeat dad has finally taken some responsibility about the mess he has created. The film does not end with any easy answer, just the idea that the problem has now been addressed and they can all begin to move forward.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
As Powerful as Ever
filmfan4627 February 2020
Arguably one of the best movie about heroin addition. A powerful drama with bleak winter NYC location filming. Heart wrenching performances by a stellar cast. Tony Franciosa has never been better. Remain unforgettable.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed