Geheimnisse des Meeres

Will the sea around us become the sea above us? The last words of this 1953 documentary are startlingly prescient: (Quote) There is a theory so startling and so scientifically documented that all the world might well take notice. The theory is that here in the Arctic, buried beneath a billion tons of frozen sea, hides an astonishing secret. If all the ice and all the world continues to melt, the levels of all the seas will rise 100 feet or more, and the great cities of the world might well be drowned. It has been established beyond all reasonable doubt that the great Arctic change of climate started somewhere about 1900 and has spread so rapidly that small glaciers have already disappeared. The big ones are melting at a startling rate. Man, with all the science of the past at his command, now knows that the melting of all these glaciers... might one day drown more than half the earth.

What is the fate of the world?

Is this the end?

The film is based on "The Sea Around Us," the extraordinary book published by Rachel Carson in 1952. She signed away rights to the title and got a little bit of money. She was appalled by early scripts and did not like the finished product.

Adaptation of Rachel Carson's book about the sea. I've never read the book so I don't know how faithful it is but some of this is fascinating. It starts out pretty badly with ponderous narration describing how the Earth (and sea) came into being. After that it lightens up pretty quickly and shows us various creatures of the sea including some incredible microscopic views of sea life. There's an interesting (and non-bloody) fight between a shark and an octopus. It also shows various occupations men have dealing with the sea like a shark walker and crab herder. The part showing different ways to capture fish (so they can be killed and eaten) might be troubling to some viewers but it's more of a sign of the time it was made than anything else. Narration aside this should be seen for visuals alone. Also the ending seems to predict global warming before it was discovered! I give it an 8.

It's an early documentary about the ocean. The color film has its limits but the film takes it to that limit. It starts with the biblical Genesis and volcanic reds. It continues with a lot of God and a lot of nature. It has some amazing microscopic creatures and that cinematography is good even for today. It must have awed audiences at the time. It would win the Oscar for best documentary. Granted, much of the footage must have been filmed in a tank although there is plenty of open ocean work. As part of the old ways, they do show capturing of a shark. More than half of the film is about people including the fishery rather than the natural world. It does show some giant crabs. I've never seen crabs that big. Modern environmental films would skip some of this. All in all, some of this leaves me awe-struck and would inspire future nature films. Then it ends with a gut punch. I didn't realize that global warming science was discussed so early on.

This is a shockingly awful 'documentary'....what the viewer sees is almost beyond belief.

Plot in a nutshell: Underwater photographers reveal various aspects of sea life, with a healthy dose of human interference.

Why is this shockingly awful? "The Sea Around Us" is not a documentary in any modern sense of the word. If by 'documentary', you imagine film-makers immersing themselves into nature and documenting what they see, you'll be very surprised by this film; because what you get here instead is mankind inserting himself into the sea, and more importantly the film, usually to the detriment of the sea life around him.

Rather than being called "The Sea Around Us," a more accurate title would be "Man's Clueless Exploitation of the Sea." I don't think you can really have 'spoilers' for a documentary, so I'm not going to check that box, and really, what I'm about to say here SHOULD be known by anyone who thinks s/he might be interested in this 'nature' film.

Imagine seeing a diver spearing a barracuda. Then the diver spearing a moray eel. Then the diver stabbing a small shark in its belly with a knife when it comes too close. This is in fact the film-maker's idea of a documentary, it seems - namely, 'Go deep-sea diving, and kill everything that crosses your path.' Anyone who enjoys nature and wants to learn more about it will likely be flabbergasted, horrified and stunned when watching this film, as I was.

The carnage doesn't stop there. The viewer also sees an example of deep-sea trawler fishing, where the fishermen scoop up everything they can in a huge net, and whatever they don't want - 'bycatch' - simply dies in the process. We witness sponges being collected by men off the sea floor, and see salmon on their way to their breeding grounds instead being caught by fishermen positioned in strategic places along a river (what a river scene is doing in a film about the sea, well, don't ask me). We also see sharks being captured for display in aquariums and hermit crabs being trapped and captured, I assume destined for pet shops everywhere. The film is capped off - believe it or not - by a whale hunt, as the viewer watches a whale get harpooned and then mercilessly stabbed to death by the hunters. The narrator then unbelievably labels the dying whale a 'monster' not once, not twice, but three times. Never mind that the whale shown here was of no threat to humans. This film - or more accurately, this utter piece of trash - is an absolute horror fest for anyone who loves nature and finds beauty within it. 'Abysmal' is a pretty fair description for this mess.

The fact that "The Sea Around Us" won an Academy Award for Best Documentary seems to be some sort of cruel joke. It speaks volumes about the stupidity of mankind and what it deemed as acceptable and good, just a few decades ago. Famous conservationist Rachel Carson's name was used to promote this film, but after seeing the finished product, she angrily distanced herself from it, and never sold the filming rights to any of her work again. Seeing this travesty of a film, that should come as no surprise.

1/10. This is valuable only in showing the viewer what was deemed normal in 1950s America. It should serve as Exhibit A for "What to avoid when making a documentary." Would I watch again (Y/N): Hell no!