The Man from Planet X (1951) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
72 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
You Have to Love It
Hitchcoc13 November 2014
This is wonderful in its own way. An alien has landed in the moors of Scotland and an American reporter comes to visit at the behest of an astronomer who has noticed a planet heading for the Earth. In the mix is a genius scientist who has a few loose screws, played by William Schallert (remember him as Dobie Gillis's teacher and Patty Duke's father, among others). One night the daughter of the scientist is coming back from town when she encounters a space ship. Upon investigating, she sees a face in the window of the ship which terrifies her. The rest of the movie involves a series of efforts to connect with the alien (who is about as unconvincing as is humanly possible). He has no facial movements and a single expression, as if he is paralyzed. They befriend him but Schallert soon screws things up by cutting off the air supply to the poor guy. Schallert seems to think that somehow this creature will make him rich and famous, though we're never sure how that is going to happen. This guy is connected to the planet that is going to launch a full scale invasion. The reporter goes to the local authorities. People have been disappearing and there is a lot of tension. The constable, who looks like he won second place in a Rod Steiger look-alike contest helps out. He is by far the best actor and the most believable character in the movie. All activities from this point on are at best bewildering, but it doesn't matter. Made on a shoestring budget, it's very nice entertainment for those who don't wish to ask any questions.
18 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
It Ain't No Highland Bluff!
BaronBl00d20 January 2007
An elderly scientist has discovered that a new planet has somehow changed its orbital path and will soon come dangerously close to the Earth. An American reporter goes to the northern most reaches of Scotland to meet with this professor in hopes that he can tell the world of his findings. Upon arrival he meets the young, beautiful daughter that he knew previously as a gawky child and a Dr. Mears, a scientist that should have been jailed for some past crimes but somehow was not convicted and was staying at the Professor's castle because of their former relationship as teacher and pupil. It is with this exposition that famed B director Edgar G. Ulmer then sends an alien in a small, weird-looking spaceship to this area for the purpose of scouting out another place for his/its own kind. Well, the story takes some interesting, some obvious steps in terms of fleshing out the story, but when the end result is viewed - one should be impressed with several things. First of all, the budget for this film was incredibly small. Ulmer rented out the old sets from Joan of Arc and then transformed them into the castle and Scottish bogs. They are convincing thanks to his heavy use of fog machines. The fog swirls and floats throughout. His special effects are not that bad either for the budget. The alien created looks surprisingly eerie in the fog as it looks through its glass helmet with those glazed, cold, blank eyes. But Ulmer does more than just create an alien that terrifies a region. Ulmer gives the alien a bit of soul. He ends up being a menace, but a question arises that would he have been that same menace if an evil human being had not been involved in trying to communicate with him. Ulmer leaves the answer to you - and it is a stylish, almost profound thing to do in a film like this. Make no mistake, The Man from Planet X is a B picture all the way, but it is a quality B picture with solid, innovative direction, haunting images, good acting from Robert Clarke as the lead, Margaret Field(Sally Field's mom) as the love-interest/daughter, and good-old William Schallert as the conniving Dr. Mears. My favourite performance though is by Roy Engel as a Scottish policeman. He can chew up some scenery!
21 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Classic among Big-Headed Monsters
clearwrite13 April 2000
One of the five sci-fi's I remember every single detail of from my earliest days as a fan. For the genre, I think it's considerably above average. The moor is nicely atmospheric. There's one of every character in the book: the good guy, the bad guy, the local sheriff, the lovely damsel, her father the old professor, etc. The scene where we're looking for the first time through the window of the ship and the visitor peeks out from the other side is easily as good as the three-fingered-hand-on-the-shoulder in War of the Worlds. Nice "character" to the visitor, for whom, like Karloff's Frankenstein, we end up feeling some empathy .
42 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Cult for Fans of the Genre
claudio_carvalho11 March 2015
The reporter John Lawrence (Robert Clarke) visits Dr. Robert Blane (Gilbert Fallman) and learns that his friend, Prof. Elliot (Raymond Bond) has discovered a new planet that is in route toward Earth and has moved to an observatory on the Burry Island to observe from a closer location. John heads to the Scottish island and is welcomed by Prof. Elliot's daughter Enid Elliot (Margaret Field), who is now a beautiful young woman. They go to the observatory to meet Prof. Elliot and John finds Dr. Mears (William Schallert), who is his disaffection. When Enid returns home after driving John to an inn in the town, she has a flat tire and finds a spacecraft landed on the island with a weird alien inside that follows her home. While Prof. Elliot and John want to investigate the reason why the alien landed on Earth, Dr. Mears has second thoughts. What are the true intentions of the extraterrestrial being?

"The Man from Planet X" is a campy and lame sci-fi in black and white, but also a cult for fans (like me) of sci-fi from the 50's. The story of a close encounter with an alien is from the same year of "The Day the Earth Stood Still" that is a classic. The open end, where the true intention of the extraterrestrial being is not disclosed, is excellent. My vote is six.

Title (Brazil): "O Homem do Planeta X" ("The Man From Planet X")

Note: On 23 February 2024, I saw this film again.
15 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Margaret Field, RIP
lee_eisenberg4 December 2011
Margaret Field, who died a month ago, appeared in some movies in the '40s and '50s, but then decided to concentrate on raising her family. Her daughter later became famous as a surfer girl, a flying nun, and a two-time Oscar-winning actress.

One of the elder Field's movies was this quirky sci-fi outing from the early '50s. "The Man from Planet X" focuses on an alien who lands on a Scottish island while his planet is passing ours. While some of the scientists want to communicate with this new guest, one has less than noble intentions. Ridiculous though it may be, the movie is very enjoyable in every way. It's just fun to see an alien who looks like something from an Eastern European stop-motion cartoon.

So, it shall go down in history that Sally Field's mother had an encounter with an extraterrestrial. Pretty neat. As for Planet X, I recall that Daffy Duck and Porky Pig tried to colonize it but had to contend with Marvin the Martian.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
It doesn't take long for someone to make a welcome visitor to feel not so welcome.
mark.waltz17 May 2017
Warning: Spoilers
And in this case, it's a normal good guy, William Schallert, playing the villain. As earthlings Robert Clarke, Raymond Bond, Margaret Clarke and Schallert discover an unknown planet heading into the direction of earth, they prepare for the best or the worst. When a lone creature from the earth man named planet X does show up, all but Schallert treat the visiting and nonspeaking being with sensitivity. Schallert, obviously a suspicious type, takes drastic measures to get into the visitor's mind, even going as far as physically attacking it.

This is 1950's sci-fi without the camp, without ridiculous subplots that really don't belong, and without a ridiculous looking creature. There's nothing but the story of conflicts in humanity over what's the best way to deal with the unknown, and a theory that we shouldn't shoot first and wonder about the alternative later. It's moody and deliberately slow, subtly fascinating, and more intelligent than most audiences going into expected. That makes this slow going at times, certainly having a conflict yet never fully grabbing you past feeling sorry for the poor visitor who seems to be there with good intentions. An interesting moment in the career of cult director Edgar G. Ullmer.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Loses focus in the 2nd half, but still worth seeing for SF buffs
lemon_magic26 January 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I saw this film with a couple of friends of mine who are SF buffs, working their way (chronologically) through the history of films with SF and fantasy elements. It was a pleasant surprise to see something this good from Ulmer, since my previous experience with him was a snoozer called "The Amazing Transparent Man".

Among its strong points were nice moody lighting, some very nice camera work and cinematography, some snappy acting from the lead actor (Clark) and the scientist and the bad guy (much better than a film with this kind of budget can usually hope for) and some nice use of design and well crafted effects to overcome a tiny budget. I was especially impressed by the fact that the opening scenes, where the hero and the professor have to wade though a ton of exposition, are still pretty engaging and interesting. The alien is a nice example of "less" being more - the huge head, the sketched-in features, the glass bubble helmet and the diminutive body all make for a striking image that goes a long way toward helping the viewer get into the film. So why only a "6"? (Well, it's a "strong" 6). Well, the screen play kind of loses steam right after the plot point where the alien disappears from the castle , apparently taking the heroine with him.

After a nice tight piece of ensemble acting with the five principals (if you count the alien), suddenly the movie is filled with a bunch of villager and extras argy-bargying around in bad Scottish accents, and the hero KNOWs where the alien is (back in his ship) and he KNOWS where the girl is (with the alien), but the hero just sort of sits and watches the crashed alien craft without taking any action. He talks a lot about the situation with the local sheriff. This goes on for way too long. There's also a sub plot about villagers being abducted which isn't quite convincing. And then via deus ex machina, Scotland Yard shows up and takes things in hand, and while things improve after that, the momentum and interest generated by the first half are never quite regained.

But the wind up isn't all that bad, even if it is somewhat abrupt.

I wouldn't recommend "Man" for anyone who isn't a big fan of old time SF films, but anyone who loves them will find a lot to enjoy in spite of the problems.
9 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Watchable but also kind of dull
planktonrules20 January 2007
This film certainly WON'T rank up there with the great sci-fi films of the 1950s. And, while it isn't a bad film (like PLAN 9 FROM OUTER SPACE), it certainly doesn't have a whole lot to offer or to set it apart.

Planet X apparently has somehow left its orbit and is heading towards Earth. At the same time, a space craft from this planet lands in Britain and is piloted by a guy dressed up in a space suit with a huge papier mache head! He's supposed to be an alien, but his head shows no movement at all and looks pretty silly. And, oddly, by the time the film is over, you really have no idea whether or not his intentions were hostile! The acting was okay, though oddly, aside from the locals, the major characters in the film who were Brits sounded exactly like Americans! They didn't even try to approximate the correct accent. This combined with only adequate production values and a pretty turgid script mean this film is very skip-able unless you are a big fan of 1950s sci-fi.
8 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Should be fun enough for sci-fi addicts.
Hey_Sweden14 April 2012
"The Man from Planet X" is routine overall, but it has a reasonably interesting concept - that of a wandering planet that has left its orbit - and has enough heavy atmosphere to make it an entertaining view. Said planet will come closest to Earth around the area of an island off the Scottish coast. Soon the locals realize that a representative of an alien intelligence has landed. The amusing looking creature seems to be harmless at first, but when ambitious and greedy scientist Dr. Mears (the solid veteran character actor William Schallert) starts bullying the creature into giving him information, it changes its mind and gets hostile, turning Mears and others into zombie slaves. It's up to intrepid American reporter John Lawrence (Robert Clarke) to figure out a way to stop an invasion from taking place, and to get word to the authorities.

B movie perennials Clarke and director Edgar G. Ulmer are in fine form here; Ulmer did a fine job of working his way around the low, low budgets of his films. Here he has the crew add fog to the sets of the Ingrid Bergman film "Joan of Arc" to create an eerie feel. There's a minimum of characters until the climax when citizens are mobilized against the menace; until then there's a rather intimate feel to the proceedings, and the pacing is deliberate, with a focus on mood and feel rather than action.

The acting is sincere from all concerned, with Clarke a likable, low key leading man, and lovely Margaret Field (mother of Sally Field) an appealing leading lady. Schallert is malevolent fun as the self centered Mears; other nice characterizations are by Raymond Bond as eminent scientist Professor Elliot and Roy Engel as Tommy the Constable. Clocking in at a trim 71 minutes, "The Man from Planet X", written and produced by Aubrey Wisberg and Jack Pollexfen, is a good if not great little film worth a look for genre buffs.

Seven out of 10.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Of all the moors in all the world, he had to land in mine . . .
ScottW-224 September 1998
Between the accents and the silly special effects this movie provides some excellent B-movie laughs. The character Enid's accent makes her about as British as Barbara Bush. But she makes excellent tea and knows that pharmacists in Britain are called chemists, so it's OK. She provides the love interest to the movie's hero, an American journalist and Bogart wannabe. By contrast, the local constable's over-the-top Scottish accent and dialect makes one wonder if any moment he'll blurt out, "Professor, the engines kanna take no more! They're gonna blow!" Meanwhile, there's a plot involving a planet careening toward Earth and an alien in a diving mask who can't keep his air pressure regulated and lets himself get beat up by the wormiest guy in the movie.

Best line: "Tis a fearsome visitor from another world!"

On a Mystery Science Theater 3000 cheese scale of 1 to 10, this movie is an 8.

Related trivia: Robert Clarke, the actor who plays the American journalist, appears in the 1991 stinker, "Attack from Mars," with Ann Robinson, star of the George Pal classic, "War of the Worlds". "Attack from Mars" is awful, but it proves that a paycheck is a paycheck, even in Hollywood.
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Mildly Entertaining and Historically Important
jayraskin111 October 2010
If this film had come out in the mid-50's, it could be dismissed as another low-budget, silly outer space invasion movie. However this movie appears to have been the first of such space invasion movies. It opened in March of 1951. Later that year came the openings of "The Thing from Another Planet" and "The Day the Earth Stood Still." Two other 1951 films, "When Worlds Collide" and "Superman and the Mole Men" have some space invader elements, but don't quite qualify for the genre.

The fact that it was shot in six days on a budget of $43,000 makes it more amazing. Compare that to "The Thing From Another World" ($1.6 million) or the "The Day The Earth Stood Still" ($1.2 million). While none of the technical aspects come near those two movies, the movie does have an interesting style and look that foreshadows the 1953 classic "Invaders From Mars" and even has elements from "Invasino of the Body Snatchers".

The movie is a little ambiguous about whether we are dealing with unfriendly (a la "The Thing")or friendly aliens (a la "The Day"). It seems a bit schizophrenic here with an alien that can be scary in one scene and downright adorable in another. Not having any prior such movies to really go by, the writers seem unsure in which direction to go.

Robert Clark is fine in the lead as a newspaper reporter. Margaret Field (Sally Field's mother) is good as the female love interest. William Schallert (Uncle Martin or Papo on "The Patty Duke Show) stands out as a surprisingly creepy scientific assistant.

What really carries the film is Edgar Ulmer's energetic direction. Ulmer ("Black Cat" "The Strange Woman" and "Detour")always keeps the viewer on their toes, inserting off-beat and unexpected material in nearly every scene.

It is a must for film history buffs and others will find it engagingly silly.
31 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Bigger Gem Than You May Expect
gavin69425 July 2012
As a mysterious planet hurls itself toward earth, an enigmatic extraterrestrial scout arrives on a remote Scottish island with unknown intentions.

Edgar Ulmer is not a well-known director. Horror fans may know his "Black Cat", and science fiction fans may know him for this film. But, largely, I think he has been forgotten. And that is a shame because these two films alone make for a solid legacy.

Ulmer did set design for Max Reinhardt's theater, served his apprenticeship with F. W. Murnau, and worked with directors including Robert Siodmak, Billy Wilder, Fred Zinnemann and cinematographer Eugen Schüfftan. His work is forgotten but he was a crucial piece of the early German-American film.

Sure, "Planet X" is cheesy. Yes, the camera likes to sit behind trees, and it is odd how Dr. Mears is able to walk five feet behind others without being noticed. And sure, they barely spent a penny by re0using the sets of other films. And yes, yes, the Scottish constable is a silly ethnic stereotype. All these things are true. But that is the charm.

This film excels because it embraces its cheese and runs with it. Could planets really come that close to earth? Obviously not. And no film would attempt that stunt today. But this was an era when science did not need to be in science fiction to be good. The world was less cynical and more relaxed. Enjoy!
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Terrifically awful, but just awful enough to attract cult and camp fans only
secondtake23 October 2010
The Man from Planet X (1951)

Edgar G. Ulmer is one of those B-movie directors who has a bit of a fan club based on a couple of key films--in this case "The Black Cat" and "Detour." Both are great--unqualified, compromised, odd, vaguely daring, and vaguely cheap.

I wish I could say the same for this one. This just looks like a step, or half a step, above "Plan 9" and that ilk. The acting ebbs and flows, the props are embarrassingly cheesy, and the plot is plain old simplistic and dumb. Of course, that's giving it no credit for pushing some boundaries the way Jules Verne did in fiction, because "Planet X" is an early space film. It's set on earth, but it deals with that big one--what if an alien lands. In fact, it isn't that far off from Ed Wood's "Plan 9 from Outer Space," which came out 7 years later. So Ulmer is cutting edge! But wait, what about "The Day the Earth Stood Still," which for all its cheapness is totally fabulous, and came out in that same year, indeed six months earlier, in the summer of 1951? Yes, something was in the air.

There's no sense dissecting this film, but just be warned it's not a high quality flick, and as a cult flick it lacks some of the idiosyncrasies and brazen edges of a film like "Detour," which is a paradigm of great and awful B-movie ingenuity.
9 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A Shoestring Budgetter.
Whizzer-218 June 2004
A shoestring budgetter directed by Edgar Ulmer. One of the first (if not the first) alien invasion films. The little alien, a child-like being with a big, solemn face, is known to Scottish villagers as 'the bogey' and strikes mortal terror into their hearts with his HypnoRay, a laserlike beam which reduces them to easily programmable zomboids. His motives are unclear throughout the film until a hypnoidal Dr. Mears 'spills the beans' near its end. Strong points: eerie atmosphere, production design; moody 'film noir' photography, engaging music score and interesting story. Weak points: muddled script(more plotholes than a Stephen King cemetry); stilted dialogue and wooden acting. Recommended only for diehard 1950s sci-fi fans(like myself)- this film is both a joy and a disappointment.
34 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A classic
JoeB13114 November 2009
Warning: Spoilers
A much better movie than I remember.

The basic plot, copied so many times. An alien comes to Earth, as his planet is dying and this is the only place they can go to where they can have any hope to survive. They send down a forward scout, who is going to give them a landing beacon on a remote Scottish Isle. Are his intents hostile or benign? Well, we don't really know, because he is left in the hands of the evil Dr. Mears, who did something during WWII they should have given him 20 years for. (They never really tell us what.)

So why is it a great movie? Because it got there first. Or at least one of the first. And it isn't morally two-dimensional. The alien isn't explicitly evil and the humans aren't clearly good.

It should be pointed out that this movie was one of the ones that lead to the subsequent "UFO" hysteria of 1952. Co-incidence? I think not.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Keep watching the skies
michaelRokeefe15 April 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Yes. it came out of the skies; a mysterious spaceship, being watched by Professor Elliot (Raymond Bond), lands in the moors of Scotland. An American reporter John Lawrence (Robert Clark) joins the professor in the investigation of the craft that resembles a diving bell. A distressed humanoid that piloted the craft tries to communicate that he is from a dying planet that desperately needs aid.

Very low budget and the lack of lighting actually helps the atmosphere. And the alien is one of the weirdest looking visitors to step on our planet. There is more curiosity than fear generated. This film is directed by Edgar G. Ulmer and independently made and actually distributed by United Artists, no stranger to the genre. Who can't enjoy Black and White sci-fi?

Also in the cast: Margaret Field, William Schallert, David Ormont, Gilbert Fallman and Roy Engel. You may recognize Harold Gould as a frightened villager.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Jings, Crivens, Help ma Boab! There's a Muckle Big Alien Boogle on Yon Moor.
junk-monkey2 November 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Dear Gods! this is a bad film with limited sets and fogbound, dark, please don't notice the studio wall, lighting with everyone returning to the same rock on the desolate moor more times than anyone can count. It also has some insanely stodgy dialogue of the sort more usual in dubbed Italian movies like this moment from when the scientists are trying to communicate with the alien.

Prof: We've got to reach him.

Doctor: Ah!

Prof:You have found a means of communication, Doctor?

Doctor: Yes... What's THE common denominator, professor? The basic and universal language? Geometry!

Prof: By George, Doctor! You've hit it! If anything should warrant success, this should!

Reporter: Excuse me, professor, you've lost me. I'm the shadowy figure in the left background with the stupid expression on his face - I don't get this mathematics...

And it's not just the scientists who talk like this. Even the police get to deliver this sort of garbage:

Inspector:Professor Elliot told you that planet would be within the Earth's gravitational orbit by midnight. The consequences of such an unparallelled proximity could be - - - anything. None of us knows what that... that enigma out on the moors might be planning.

Reporter: The Professor's theory was - invasion...

Inspector: We can't risk determining whether it has any fact. A Planet of such size coming so close to ours might cause a disastrous atmospheric upheaval as well.

No one says:"We can't risk determining whether it has any fact." it doesn't make any sense. I can only assume the actor garbled his line and, as this whole scene was done in one master shot, there was no way of cutting it.

But best of all were the 'Scottish' accents. Some of the most hilariously bad cod Scots ever committed to celluloid. They make the Simpsons' Groundskeeper Willie and Star Trek's Scotty characters sound vaguely authentic. Every R is rolled till it hurts. Sometimes the accents ladled on so think it's incomprehensible. I cannae tell whither it's the Scot's the mon is takin' or same of ye ither furrin tongue ye ken? Hoots mon.

Ach mon, will yea no be talking the blethers the noo?

Ach! That I am, laddie, that I am.
6 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
"Man from space? What clapper-claw is this?"
classicsoncall11 July 2015
Warning: Spoilers
My choice for a summary line was a toss up between the above and newspaperman John Lawrence's comment to a local constable - "Believe me man, we're in trouble". I found the dialog to improve considerably in the second half when the British authorities came on the scene and delivered their distinctive brand of local colloquialisms. I just about rolled on the floor when the conversation turned to 'boogeys'; I didn't quite know what to make of all that.

Well this might not be one of the best outer space flicks coming out of the Fifties, but it was one of the first and had it's cool share of scientific gobbledy-gook to keep one invested in the story. Of note was the specific gravity of the space object discovered by Lawrence and Enid Elliott (Margaret Field), one-fifth that of steel making it incredibly strong but with tremendous tensile strength. The space creature's first appearance is also a neat shocker if you're not expecting it, sending Miss Elliott into screaming fits as she dashed across the Scottish countryside.

Shot on a virtual shoestring budget in only six days, the set used by director Edgar Ulmer was a hold over from the 1948 Ingrid Bergman film "Joan of Arc". Economizing even further, Ulmer capitalized on additional use of fog to fill in the spaces where there was no set. Considering the obstacles, Ulmer wound up with a product that's not nearly as cheesy as it could have been. The picture even poses a thoughtful question for the viewer to consider after the alien sphere is obliterated and the threatening planet zooms away - was the coming alien invasion a blessing or a curse?

For all that, it was many years after the picture's release that the actor who portrayed the alien was even revealed for his role in the picture. Not only was Pat Goldin uncredited, he wasn't even paid!, according to Turner Classic Movie commentator Ben Mankiewicz. I wonder how many times he had to get in and out of that space suit.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Promising, but .........................
Panamint2 January 2007
Clarke is personally a lively actor and is fully competent for 1950's sci-fi. He could have done a fine job as leading man in any such film, even big-budget prestige sci-fi.

The rest of the cast is OK. The monster is cheap but eerie and is good enough. The black and white photography, dungeon-like sets, endless fog are well done and sort of scary. The little town and townsfolk are a good example of why modern films like 1981's "American Werewolf in London" deliver fond tributes to such a setting.

The script is unnecessarily confusing but this is not really the problem. The problem is that this is slowly directed. Reluctantly must recommend you not spend your viewing time dragging through this one unless you are a dedicated 1950's sci-fi fan. However, such fans will probably find this one to be rewarding, and should give it a look.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Just for fun, some spoilers too.
bletcherstonerson21 August 2015
Hey, I love cheesy Sci-FI, especially when it is more of a pseudo science fiction. This movie is just plain fun on all levels, from the sadistic Dr. who tortures the alien while communicating in geometry, a tactic still used in most educational systems. To Sally Field's mother as the damsel in distress. A solid win for the viewer, the added artistic touches like a fog machine running 24/7 for atmosphere combined with the spaceship that looks like a Christmas ornament gives the viewer a veritable cornucopia of swatches of video wallpaper that all together make one great piece of iconic kitsch.

Also what movie from the United Kingdom would be complete without an American hero saving the day with the aid of Scotland Yard? The only bummer is I was hoping we would see Sally Fields mother in the film the way she was portrayed on the poster......not a chance, and it is too bad too, I liked that image on the poster...a lot.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The men (and woman) with painful exposition
daniewhite-125 January 2021
This is a treat for those who like primitive, cheap, early and original sci-fi films and general genre cinema: 'The Man from Planet X' is admirable in many respects but, sadly, abominable in others.

A wonderfully silly, frankly outrageous, story is given a marvelous treatment and nicely developed staging on a minor budget.

The sets, atmospherically presented and photographed, the oddball alien designs and the sound design all add good value to this film. Also aided by clipped and precise direction which extracts some movement and energy from the threadbare production budget and dreadfully written characters.

The story is a nice, different, and strangely creepy idea of an unexpected rapidly approaching planet and it's lonesome scout scuttling around on a desolate Scottish island on the edge of the British Isles. The early interactions between mankind and this invader are worth the effort to watch.

Regrettably the issue that bedevils 'The Man from Planet X' is it's characters, dialogue, acting and accents! There is almost nothing complementary to say here about any of it. Which is a shame because this little film, on a tiny budget and production, needs much better from its characters to succeed.

It doesn't get it though and the characters remain unbelievable and inexplicable whilst spouting dire dialogue in atrocious accents.

I rate a 5/10; for this film has a lot of little credits to it's name and I recommend to keen fans of 50's stuff and science fiction fans looking for an unusual effort.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
"I'm the shadowy figure in the left background with the stupid expression on his face."
utgard1431 May 2015
A strange visitor from outer space lands on a remote Scottish island where a renowned astronomer has set up an observatory to study the mysterious Planet X, which will pass close to Earth in a few days. The astronomer, his pretty daughter, his assistant, and a visiting American reporter make contact with the alien and try to communicate with it. But things take a turn for the worse when the assistant tries to use the alien for his own ends.

The hero of the movie is played by Robert Clarke. With his pencil mustache, bomber jacket, and turtleneck, he's the definition of cool. William Schallert plays the villain. It's a different type of role than I'm used to seeing Schallert in but he plays bad very well. Margaret Field (mother of Sally) does fine as the astronomer's daughter and potential love interest for Clarke. Roy Engel is great in a small part as the constable. This is a very good, low-budget sci-fi film from the Golden Age of Sci-Fi (the 1950s). It's helped a lot by a short runtime and Edgar G. Ulmer's atmospheric direction. Most of the movie takes place at night, with lots of scenes on the fog-shrouded moors or the castle observatory. Creepy fun for fans of classic horror and sci-fi. Also, this was made back in the days when stories involving space and aliens were still filled with wonder and the fantastic, not the boring "realism" that permeates modern sci-fi. So here we have a big-headed alien in a neat-looking spacesuit traveling in an awesome rocket ship. Very entertaining for those who appreciate such things.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Knowledge would only bring more fear in a world already filled with it.
hitchcockthelegend24 May 2015
A planet is orbiting dangerously close to planet Earth and a mysterious spaceship has landed on the Scottish Moors...

Friend or Foe?

Breaking it down you find that The Man from Planet X is a standard sci-fi movie that would often be bettered the longer the 1950s boom of sci-fi films continued. However, this is in no way a bad thing given the guile and craft that went into making it a picture of worth.

Edgar G. Ulmer and his crew are armed with a $100 budget (exageration of course, but you understand I'm sure) and almost make a silk purse out of a sow's ear. Working with old sets that were used on Joan of Arc (1948), the pic is a lesson in low budget film making of note. Ulmer brings a plethora of fog and mists to cloak the sets, while he shoots his cast in low lights and shadows to ensure his sci-fi tale never has a chance to be found out as a cheapie.

As it happens the story is decent enough. Alien visitor from a dying planet needs something, but what? He can't communicate vocally and of course the humans meeting the visitor have different agendas. There's some suspense, a little bit of nutty science, and even some sexual flirtations. All in all a good solid sci-fi picture, one that showcases the unheralded skills of its director. And not even a papier-mâché headed alien can under value that fact. 7/10
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Welcome to Earth, stoic-looking green man! Now, give us all your secrets!
Coventry29 April 2019
1951 was a milestone year for Sci-Fi cinema, as it saw the birth of the "Alien Invasion" movie and immediately also two landmark-titles that still stand solid today as indestructible genre classics: "The Day the Earth Stood Still" and "The Thing from Another World". When it comes to being the absolute first alien-invasion movie, however, both these masterpieces were beaten by the modest and extremely low-budgeted "The Man from Planet X", since that one got released in the spring of '51! It's a charming and enjoyable B-movie with a cool and memorable looking alien. The American reporter John Lawrence is invited by his scientist friend Prof. John Elliott, to a remote and minuscule little island off the Scottish coast named Burry. Elliott discovered a new planet, inventively called it "X" and set up an observatory in Burry because the passing of the planet will be best seen from this island. John Lawrence is far more interested in Professor Elliot's daughter Enid, but when they romantically walk around in the Moors, they witness the landing of a peculiar spaceship and an odd-looking green visitor. Cult director Edgar G. Ulmer is notorious for accomplishing good things with minimal budgets, but he certainly did surpass himself here. "The Man from Planet X" is made on a shoestring budget, and Ulmer does whatever he can to hide it, like shrouding all the crude set-pieces and cardboard locations in thick mist or ripping off his own cast members with overdue salaries that were even less than minimum wages. But, even more remarkable than his ability to creatively camouflage budget restrictions are Ulmer's skills to nevertheless insert flashes of sheer genius and ambiguity. For example, did the stern-looking alien land on earth with malignant intentions to begin with, or did he only turn hostile after his first encounters with the typically greedy and destructive nature of earthly creatures, as demonstrated by the vicious Dr. Mears?
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed