They Were Sisters (1945) User Reviews

Sisterhood, The Strongest Bond

[bkoganbing · 8/10 · 2 August 2009]

They Were Sisters casts Phyllis Calvert, Anne Crawford, and Dulcie Gray as three sisters who meet and marry their husbands right after World War I and the film is the story of the three marriages in those years between the World Wars. It's not unlike the Bette Davis-Errol Flynn film from Warner Brothers The Sisters. But believe me there are no characters in that one as dark and sinister as James Mason here.

Phyllis Calvert is the nice one, the real glue that holds the extended family together. She meets and marries Peter Murray-Hill who was her husband in real life. They have no children, but become everyone's favorite uncle and aunt.

Anne Crawford is a spoiled child of the Roaring Twenties who wants to have every man in a room drooling when she makes an entrance. She's an incurable flirt, but she marries Barrie Livesey who's a comfortable old soul even in his youth and who knows himself, he's as dull as drying paint. One flirtation with Hugh Sinclair does put the marriage at risk however. She also ignores her only daughter who finds her best times spent with Calvert.

Dulcie Gray when she's on steals the film. Before the term was invented Gray is the perfect picture of a battered wife. She marries James Mason who systematically lowers the self esteem of a kind and generous person, even in the eyes of the three children they have. Of course Mason also starts on them as well and the other sisters soon notice it.

Mason is also at his nastiest in They Were Sisters. Without ever doing anything really physical to Gray, his voice inflections and body language suggest a truly evil man. His oldest daughter is played by Pamela Kellino who soon afterwards became Mrs. Mason in real life.

They Were Sisters explores some themes that Hollywood was not touching on at this time. Very similar to that other Gainsborough film, Fanny By Gaslight which also starred Mason and Calvert. It's a strong and disturbing film even with child characters, not necessarily for kid's viewing.

James Mason at his sadistic best

[howardmorley · 7/10 · 19 February 2007]

If you have seen "The Man in Grey (1943)" and enjoyed it, you should take the time and trouble to seek out this forgotten gem from 1945 for it again stars James Mason playing a sadistic, manipulative husband, albeit in modern dress.Alongside, it tells the story of three very different sisters at a time between the two world wars.The story also follows their respective marriages and the type of husbands they wed.

Phylis Calvert (Lucy) plays a "goody two shoes" sister who has tragically lost a daughter but has a very supportive, understanding husband.A very sexy Anne Crawford plays a promiscuous wife (Vera) who finds her husband boring and looks for affairs on the side.To be fair to her character, she did say to her fiancé that she did not love him before they wed.Nevertheless they have a daughter together.There is a brief sexy scene where Vera is putting on her stockings which is far more daring than you will see in American films of the time with the Hays Censorship Code in place.I have quite a collection of films of this vintage and the only equivalent film I can think of is the Madeleine Carroll/Robert Donat scene in the Scottish hotel bedroom from "The 39 Steps" (1935).As an aside, if you would like to see another performance by Anne Crawford, seek out "Millions Like Us" (1943).

Finally Dulcie Gray plays (Charlotte) the passive victim-type sister who marries "Geoffrey" (James Mason) at his sadistic best.They have an elder daughter and a younger son and daughter who come to despise their cruel, manipulative father.You may smile at their frightfully refined, polished accents (presumably taught at stage school) but this is one of the charms I find from films of this time.Another reviewer commented on the near incestuous relationship hinted at in the film with his elder daughter played by his later real wife, Pamela Mason. Good must triumph in these morality films of the time.No, I won't provide a spoiler.I do know that I have my wife's attention with a film such as "They Were Sisters" if I dare to speak during it and she cuts me off.This was no exception!!

Watch It For Mason

[jem132 · 6/10 · 29 January 2007]

This rarely seen film is a fairly average British Gainsborough drama that is lifted by a sneering, saturnine performance from darkly handsome James Mason. The sheer presence of the excellent British actor enhances the film by a mile, and it's interesting theme of spousal abuse make it worth watching.

Mason stars as the husband who taunts his wife with verbal (and occasionally physical) abuse. His constant abuse and his general disinterest in the union cause his wife to turn to drink, and she eventually degrades into an alcoholic. The film follows the wife's plight as her two sisters try to save her from this nightmare marriage as well as focus on their own lives.

Mason enhances the rather dry script, taken from a novel, with his characteristic smooth, sardonic dialogue delivery. You've seen him in this role for Gainsborough films at least half a dozen times, yet his portrayal still works. Mason provides the film's highlights and his character is far more interesting than any of the transparent, thinly created sisters. That said, Phyllis Calvert gives a strong performance, the film's second best, as a concerned sister who is childless.

If one does not know of the off-screen relationship Mason has with the actress playing his daughter (later Pamela Mason)one would assume their scenes together as father and daughter are tinged with incest. His embraces are frankly disturbing in their affection and his wish to dominate over her life is paramount. This incest angle could be due to Mason's real-life affection for the woman, or the film-maker's actual intent. Freudian theory and psychological explanations were very much in vogue in the mid 1940's (see Spellbound, The Seventh Veil). Mason's suffocating love for his daughter projects what little humanity and affection he possesses-it is a dastardly love but a love he is still capable of. In some strange way, this could redeem his character.

Overall, watch it for Mason. He is terrific in all of his films and he does well with his role in this one.

James Mason's cruelty makes you watch, but it's unpleasant

[hollywoodlegend · 6/10 · 30 December 2012]

Phyllis Calvert is lovely and sympathetic and, aside from the children and the dog, is the only one to really cheer for. Although most female viewers will be lured in by James Mason's disturbingly alluring cruelty, they will probably find it quite ugly by the end. Being set in the more modern day, with Mason in a suit and driving a car, instead of a period costume and a horse, makes this story all the more unpleasant. Worst of all is the casting of Mason's real-life wife Pamela as his eldest daughter (!) Unless this was a rare glimpse of him breaking character with the camera rolling, his physical affection with her in their many shared scenes surely indicated incest. Eww! Her performance doesn't give that impression, but then she wasn't much of an actress. Allegedly her character is mature, yet she calls him "Daddy" throughout. His poor on- screen wife and children suffer his endless verbal and emotional abuse. He even threatens the poor dog. The most entertaining scene for me (as an American) was when the young son is playing with a new gun, and Cruel Papa Mason says he MAY have to take that away from him. Unlike the villain you loved to hate in The Man in Grey and The Wicked Lady, here his villain is more like alcoholic pervert uncle-by-marriage who manages to ruin every family gathering. You'll applaud Phyllis Calvert's kind- hearted character but won't find any redeeming value in Mason's villain.

Malevolent Mason Makes For Matrimonial Woes

[malcolmgsw · 6/10 · 12 July 2020]

James Mason is at his worst who is abusive to his wife and has a crush on his daughter,played by his actual wife.This is one of the parallel stories featuring the lives of three sisters.The other two stories are relatively mild and mundane,especially when compared to the third sister.

Domestic abuse without physical violence

[clover-6 · 10/10 · 21 September 1999]

Possibly the most compelling, if not nauseating depiction of non-physical domestic abuse that I've seen. Also, it seems about as clear as it could be at the time the film was made that the James Mason character is having a sexual relationship with his daughter, and the dynamic in their relationship is sometimes a bit too real to watch. James Mason seemed to get typecast in this sort of role for a while, probably because he's so good at it.

Mason at his most malevolent!!!!!

[kidboots · 10/10 · 5 October 2008]

Was there ever a more sadistic character masked in a disguise of normality than Geoffrey Lee (James Mason) from "They Were Sisters" "From the famous novel by Dorothy Whipple" - that's what the opening credits say. Dorothy Whipple was a popular English writer of the 1930s and 40s. Two of her books were made into films - "They Knew Mr. Knight" and "They Were Sisters".

The film begins in 1919 with a dance, establishing the sister's personalities. Lucy (in a role tailor made for top British star, Phyliss Calvert) the sensible, dependable one, Vera (Anne Heywood) the flirtatious one and Charlotte (Dulcie Gray) the quiet sister who lacks confidence. Also at the dance is Geoffrey Lee, a selfish opportunist who at first tries to interest Vera, then turns his attentions to Charlotte. He marries Charlotte but his boorish behaviour at the reception doesn't bode well for their married life.

Sensible Brian has always loved Vera (even though she says she doesn't love him) proposes to her and is accepted. Lucy marries William Worth, an architect employed by her father.

Eighteen years later the sisters are reunited for a weekend. Charlotte is scared and worn down and Vera has still got her flirty ways. When Charlotte arrives home it is obvious the whole family (except for Margaret (Pamela Kellino) - there is an odd element between father and daughter) are petrified of Geoffrey. He is a sadistic brute who locks Charlotte out of their room and when she arranges to leave, feigns a heart attack to induce her to stay. Charlotte then turns to drink.

At a dinner at Vera's house, Margaret finds an admirer and Judith makes friends with Vera's daughter Sarah. The children all have problems from their upbringing and find a haven at the home of Lucy and William.

After being beaten by Geoffrey, Charlotte is visited by Lucy, who brings her and the children home for a visit. Stephen brings their dog, Crusoe, even though Geoffrey has forbidden the dog to go. When Geoffrey finds out, the dog is given to the Worth's housekeeper.

Vera has her own problems - she is having an affair and this time she is really in love. She plans to run away with him and her husband, who knows about it, plans to give her a divorce. She was to have met Geoffrey, to keep him busy while Lucy secretly brings a doctor to check out Charlotte. Vera misses the appointment and Charlotte tries for the last time to leave him, running straight into the path of an approaching car. Charlotte dies and Lucy creates a sensation at the inquest by exposing Geoffrey and his sadistic ways.

The film ends with Lucy and William, who have never been able to have children, looking after the children of Vera and Charlotte.

It is a melodramatic film but it keeps you watching. All the stars are excellent in their roles although James Mason and Phyliss Calvert, are, for me, the standouts.

Highly Recommended.

It's all about chemistry

[calvertfan · 10/10 · 6 September 2002]

I once read an article which stated that Phyllis Calvert and Peter Murray-Hill would have been "Britain's Nick and Nora" had they made more films together. On seeing them act separately in films, I took that commentary to be a bit too hopeful. Then, I saw "They Were Sisters". And - move over Myrna and Bill! When together, Phyl and Peter did not seem at all like they were acting, they were just a happily married couple bantering, teasing the other lightly and ad-libbing as if they were not in a movie at all, but just out for a weekend picnic. Their scenes together were by far the movie's best.

At the other end of the scale is James Mason and Pamela Kellino (later Pamela Mason). They were playing father and daughter in the movie, and if you hadn't known about their off-screen relationship, seeing the way they interacted on the screen would have been a bit worrying.

With the wrong actors, "They Were Sisters" could have easily been a ridiculous farce, and at times it does begin to stray towards over-acting. But with the right actors, including the three youngest children, it comes across perfectly and is a movie well worth watching. 10/10

Stone(y) Mason

[writers_reign · 8/10 · 3 November 2016]

It's always a pleasure to finally catch up with a film some 70 years after its initial release and it pleases rather than disappoints. This is just such a film and it's equally pleasurable to see once more the Gainsborough logo with the lady's bowing head. Virtually everyone writing here has mentioned the slightly bizarre relationship between James Mason and Pamela Kellino playing his daughter; nearly all the viewers describe Kellino erroneously as Mason's real life wife to be when they had in fact been married for four years when the film was shot so she was well and truly Pamela Mason by then but for reasons best known to herself used the name of her ex-husband Roy Kellino. At this point in his career Mason's sneer was as much a signature as Richard Widmark's ominous laugh and he keeps it on full throttle throughout whilst chewing all the scenery at hand. In complete contrast is Phyllis Calvert's Goody Two Shoes and these two performances dominate a well above average cast. Melodrama, yes, but nostalgic with it.

Excellent film almost ruined by the final scene

[jromanbaker · 9/10 · 31 January 2021]

This is a truly shocking film, and it is certainly not a weepie. Usually Gainsborough films have left me cold, indulging mostly in a fake delirium of both plots and characters. There are exceptions and this is one of them. It shows in tragic detail the details of false marriages, and the pain that children feel watching helplessly and not being able to escape or react. The plot is not melodramatic, and the suffering, intensely portayed by the three sisters of the title, and how only one of the three is happy with her husband rings true. To give away the plot is unfair, because the unravelling of the three marriages is so meticulously done. Dulcie Gray is the most tragic of the three and acts very well, and so does Phyllis Calvert but the third sister played by Anne Crawford ( who died far too young ) gives an extraordinary performance. Her coldness towards her husband almost equals the cold male brutality James Mason portrays as a real emotional killer. I also think in watching this film that viewers of our era should not find the mannerisms of the first half of the 20th C. to be out of date or ' funny ' in any way. Each period has its social mannerisms and if time allows at the end of this century people may look back and laugh. I do not find the film dated, and the subject matter of marital abuse and cruelty is as important today as then. Watch the scene where a father threatens to take away a loved dog from his child, by either giving it to a woman who does not want it or have it ' put down '. The devastation on the child's face is terrible to watch, and the director Arthur Crabtree excels in showing human tyranny and human suffering without sentimentality. Only the final scene nearly ruins what went before, but I guess after WW2 in 1945 an audience could only take so much. I would give it a 10 if that scene had not ( perhaps ) been tagged on.

Interesting anatomy of a family tragedy with a number of outstanding performances

[clanciai · 9/10 · 9 November 2015]

This is a women's film but extremely interesting for anyone to study in detail, as there are four different female characters developing in different directions, and each one is of paramount interest. The question is whose is the most interesting. Is it Phyllis Calvert as the strongest character who is doomed to a childless life with the best of husbands but makes the best of it by her honesty, or is it Anne Crawford as the more liberated Lucy, who is the one who from the beginning sees through the ugliness of James Mason's character, is it Dulcie Gray in her heartrending martyrdom gradually driven to the despair of alcoholism by the subtly increasing cruelty of her husband, or is it Pamela Kellino as James Mason's daughter torn between her loyalty to her after all loving father and her empathy with her mother? The drama is nonexistent at first, everything starts in a perfectly idyllic setting where nothing could even be suspected to go wrong, but gradually the tragedy sneaks in to grow surreptitiously into an overwhelming drama of human disintegration. It is marvellously composed, and Hubert Bath's idyllic music adds to it. James Mason of course dominates the whole stage from the first to the last in the extremely difficult performance of being convincingly inhumanly cruel after having started off as the perfect charmer, but every performance here is great, in a fascinating family chronicle of relationship complications that could happen in any family. Nine points at least.

Three sisters....grown into three very different women.

[planktonrules · 9/10 · 27 January 2017]

This British film is very similar to the earlier Warner Brothers film "The Sisters". It follows the lives of three sisters from when they were dating to many years later after they have been married for some time. Vera is a selfish and vain woman who is more concerned with her affairs than her husband. Lucy is very happily married to a very good man but she's the only sister who has no children. And Charlotte is pitiful...devoted to a horrible and abusive husband (James Mason). While the husband is rather cold and nasty towards his two youngest children, he's unnaturally attached to his oldest daughter, Margaret--a substitute for the wife he disdains. Despite this being a film about sisters, the stand out actor in the film was Mason. He dominated the scenes he was in and his character was so caustic and evil he is hard NOT to notice!

This is an exceptional film and I like how it shows how each sister makes choices--for good or evil. I also LOVE that it shows the impact of these decisions on the children. A sad, moving movie...well worth seeing though I must admit it starts VERY slowly. Stick with this one. It's worth it...and the ending is very, very sweet...but in the best of ways.

James Mason gives a master class in villainy.

[mark.waltz · 8/10 · 25 July 2019]

While this British melodrama indicates that the film is about three sisters, all eyes are on James Mason as the emotionally cruel husband of one of them (Dulcie Gray). Mason becomes vehnemently manipulative to keep her under his thumb and watching her die inside as he neglects two of their children and seemingly doting on their oldest in a way that is downright disgusting. The two other sisters (Phyllis Calvert and Anne Crawford), having already dealt with their emotional issues, must come together for the benefit of Gray and her children, causing Mason to banish Calvert, the more caring and hands on siblimg, obviously the strength and backbone of the three sisters. But tragedy is inevitable, and even Mason must face some sort of reality, even if he is not capable of change.

There is much detail put into the characterization of each of the sisters, their husbands and offspring, although Calvert's character, the most deserving to be a mother, is tragically childless. It shows how a spoiled young woman raises a spoiled but neglected young daughter and the impact that comes out of that relationship. It's often slow and moody, with Mason basically playing a variation of the character that Charles Boyer played in "Gaslight", but it is ultimately rewarding as a tragic family saga of selflessness, selfishness and even sadomasochistic cruelty. Mason's character is not a black and white villain, but somebody whose circumstances you can understand, if not agree with. Dorothy Whipple's novel seems to be quite ahead of its time in its brutal honesty, and the film does not shirk any of that blunt realism.

Decent post-war British weepy melodrama.

[abecrabt · 9/10 · 18 February 2020]

"They Were Sisters", a lush, Black and White studio film, has the cream of post-war British acting talent (Phyllis Calvert, James Mason, Anne Crawford.) You will need to get over the hurdle of tolerating that late 1940s bright, British way of talking, only nowadays to be heard in reduced form from the Queen. Also, accept and get used to the slightly wooden "Peter and Jane" style child actors - then you'll see a great weepy melodrama.

James Mason is deliciously malevolent and controlling of his drippy, sweet, doormat of a wife, the fragile Dulcie Gray. This sister's marriage troubles are timeless - what we would nowadays see as coercive control, or "gaslighting". Her sister Vera, played by that specialist of a high-maintenance woman, Anne Crawford, has a marriage more particular to the upper middle-class of the middle years of the century: a spoilt trophy wife, like a character from Noel Coward who's strayed into a melodrama, but still highly entertaining for it. The perfect, third sister Lucy has the perfect marriage, except she cannot have children, and so dotes on her sisters' neglected children. We're not great ones for family dramas like this nowadays, being rather individualistic and focussed on our ability to choose whether we marry and whether children quite fit our modern, choice-filled lives, so it is a refreshing pleasure to see this sisters' family drama, let's say from a "family" era.

Interestingly the wicked James Mason character's seventeen year old daughter is well played by Pamela Kellino, his future wife and already thirty in this picture - one of those actresses like Alicia Silverstone who seem able to play teenagers into their thirties. James Mason seems to have shown up as his smooth self in so many anonymous films that I'm inclined to avoid him; that's a bit absurd, because he's in so many good ones, in particular this one: see what he's made of here.

Give this great film a chance: if you can accept the accents and jauntiness and stop noticing them, it's a great melodrama, and the softer amongst you might finish up blubbing - maybe not quite "Wonderful Life" territory, but could be tear jerking.

Predictable but gripping

[fran-rhowbotham · 9/10 · 14 January 2019]

Loved this film. James Mason gorgeously dastardly and children roles not as superficial as many other films. Very confused about IMDB and Wickipedia entries though. Saw this today and Lucy character had lost a child. Hence discussing removing a picture of their dead daughter before notice Judith came to stay for fear of upsetting her that children sometimes die. Yet IMDB and Wickipedia both say she was childless, have they watched the film!

****

[edwagreen · 10/10 · 26 January 2017]

Why don't we hear more about this masterpiece of a film exploring verbal abuse by James Mason, at his best here.

The story of 3 sisters who marry and the only one finding happiness lost her child.

Mason, as the abuser, and Dulcie Gray, who is unfortunate to be his wife, steal the acting in the film. A tense drama, I was wondering why the picture went from 1919 to 1937 so quickly in a flash. I was soon mesmerized by the effects of marriage upon the three couples.

Phyllis Calvert is the selfish sister who warned her husband-to-be that she didn't love him and could drop him at a moment's notice. Blinded by his love for her, he was willing to give marriage a chance.

Of course, the Mason-Gray marriage is the focus here, with Mason's constant verbal and mental abuse leading to tragedy at the end. The other sister, too busy with her lover, didn't come to help her sister at a critical moment and that invariably led to the suicide of Charlotte, Mason's long-suffering wife.

The children in the film play their parts to the hilt and the movie should be seen as a reminder of what mental and verbal abuse can do.