Desert Victory (1943) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
11 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Excellent contemporary account of the Battle for North-west Africa
scnzSteve1 August 2006
This documentary account of the victorious campaign in Egypt and Northern Africa is nearly 100% actual war footage. In the inimitable British tradition it is factual, not propaganda-based (although some emotive wording can be found in the commentary). The Brits are to be commended for making a film of the campaign so quickly (1943) so that the public were able to unravel what really happened and what part they, their friends & relatives might have played in supporting the effort. Highly motivational stuff. Superb footage of all the protagonists, including Montgomery, Churchill, & Rommel (captured German footage!) etc. For authenticity this would be as near as possible to faultless. A great story and one that deserves to be re-told. The film is just over an hour in length, and does not drag at all. Recommended for anyone interested in World War 2 or in great land battles.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
DESERT VICTORY (Roy Boulting and David MacDonald, 1943) ***
Bunuel19762 January 2014
This is another example of a film – or, in its case, a documentary – which was much lauded by critics once upon a time but which, when viewed today, does not come across as particularly outstanding (if eliciting occasional excitement throughout from the mainly dimly-lit barrage of various types of artillery). I mean this criticism towards it exclusively as a cinematic product, of course, since the events depicted – the Allies' defeat of Field Marshall Erwin Rommel's previously invincible North Africa campaign in 1942 – constitute one of the most decisive turning points of WWII. The fact that it was all captured live by respected British film people (albeit uncredited!) is all the more remarkable when considering that several cameramen were killed, wounded or imprisoned by the enemy during its shooting, as the opening text duly informs us; interestingly, then, the scenes showing Rommel himself and, briefly, Adolf Hitler was 'supplied' via confiscated footage in possession of German P.O.W.s! Many such 'classic' efforts were released during the course of the 6 year-long (1939-45) global conflict by notable British and American film directors, a good number of which I own and have watched in the past, while a few more will be included among my initial spate of 2014 viewings.

For the record, the print I watched of DESERT VICTORY had a 10-minute newsreel – FILM BULLETIN NO. 45: U.S. ATTACKS IN THE ALEUTIANS – appended to it, revolving around battles in the Pacific that were also officially 'reported' by John Huston. Incidentally, the latter competed with the film under review for Best Documentary Feature at the Oscars, but the British effort emerged victorious; besides, co-director Boulting made BURMA VICTORY (1946) in a similar vein.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Turning Point
boblipton29 May 2021
Here's a documentary about the lead-up to and battle of El Alamein, the turning point of the war from Britain's viewpoint. Like most of the best of British propaganda films of the Second World War, it offers a matter-of-fact attitude towards the events, explaining the strategy that Alexander and Montgomery planned, and the turning into a very noisy series of clips, interspersed with maps showing the movements of the British salients and German countermoves. It feels like it could have been briefer, but they wanted it to come in a touch over an hour to give it feature status.

I begins with a series of title cards, explaining that four British cameramen were killed making this movie, seven wounded, and six captured by the Germans.... and that movies of Rommel were captured by the British army's advance.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dangerous Work.
rmax30482325 September 2011
Warning: Spoilers
By 1943, the German Field Marshall Rommel had pushed the British forces under Auchinleck back to within 60 miles of Alexandria, Egypt. Auchinleck was relieved by Generals Alexander and Montgomery, who dug in, and then successfully counter-attacked at El Alamein, saving Egypt from German and Italian conquest.

Not that most of the Italians were a great threat. Their leadership was poor, for one thing. And they were held in contempt by their Afrika Korps counterparts. One of the Italian generals was Ettore Bastico, to whom Rommel referred as "Bombastico." Their equipment was outdated and poor. Many weren't overly fond of Mussolini and his aggressive foreign policy and his eager affiliation with Hitler's Germany. For these and other reasons, their team spirit was on the low side and the British and Commonwealth troops swept them up by the thousands.

I mention this because the actual movements of the various forces are described well enough in another review, so there's not much point in describing them again.

It's a war time propaganda movie and very well done for what it is. Propaganda itself is interesting because it's possible to mislead without actively lying. For example, we don't see or hear anything in this film that is untrue in any strict sense of the word. But what's interesting is what ISN'T said or seen.

One of the principal reasons Rommel lost the battle of El Alamein is that he was at the very end of his supply line. He simply ran out of stuff. He was outnumbered in tanks, supplies, and combat-ready troops. He was out of fuel. He abandoned some operational tanks by draining their fuel in order to keep other tanks moving.

And the reason for this was that the thread of his supply line ran from Italy to Tripoli, hundreds of miles by sea, and then still more hundreds of miles over the single coastal road. The coastal road was vulnerable to air attack. The convoys were vulnerable to attack both by air and submarine and shipping was regularly sunk, so that Rommel had almost nothing to replace his losses.

And one of the chief reasons for THIS is that the British had broken the Italian naval code and knew roughly when and where the convoys would be at any given time. Of course, this couldn't even be hinted at in a 1943 documentary. Secrecy was so important that an air attack on a ship could not be called off, even though at the last moment it was discovered that the ship carried Allied POWs.

And Rommel's retreat from El Alamein was not a rout, it was orderly. As he was driven back to his own ports, Rommel was able to replace some of his supplies, and he went on to turn his retreat from the east into an attack on American and British troops in the West.

But you can't have this sort of information in a documentary made during the conflict itself. The élan, which the Italian troops lacked, had to be kept up at home and in the field.

The print I saw was in pretty bad shape. The narrative was relevant and informative, although sometimes five minutes would pass during which we see many guns and tanks and troops dashing around but the narrator tells us nothing about what we're watching. Some of the footage obviously doesn't match the narrative closely but if you're not a purist you won't mind. The graphics are very helpful.

Now that the shouting is all over, there is a more balanced and orderly presentation of these incidents available on the "Battlefield" series of DVDs. The boxed set of DVDs contains El Alamein, North Africa, and the Mediterranean.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Historic film
malcolmgsw24 December 2019
This was one of a number of documentaries made by the Ministry of Information spotlighting successful military campaigns.It is well made and serves its propaganda purpose.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Believe me! You Do not want to miss this one!
llltdesq5 April 2001
This has to be one of the greatest documentaries of all time! The combat footage is all real! At the beginning, there is a notation that, in the fighting depicted, four of the cameramen were killed and thirteen others were either wounded or captured by the enemy. There is also footage taken by the Germans that was captured in the British advance. Watching this, think about one thing: everything you are seeing, a camerman was close enough to shoot with a camera and was, while filming, unarmed and a target. Hemingway defined courage as "grace under pressure". This marvelous masterpiece is a testament to incredible courage. Words fail to do these brave souls credit. But Desert Victory does. I salute them and the others whose courage is immortalized here on celluloid.
14 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
"Before Alamein we never had a victory. After Alamein we never had a defeat." - Churchill 1942 -
smiley-3918 December 2001
Before the Battle of Alamein reached its crescendo, and before the victorious finale in Tripoli, there was a long drawn out overture which lasted from June 1940 to October 1942. It was to turn this campaign into something unique in World War Two.

A featureless land fit only for war, as the narrator, J. L. Hodson stated in the early scenes. "If war was to be fought then let it begin here". In endless miles of rock-strewn scrub desert, where civilians hardly existed. If chivalry existed in war, then chivalry was here also; as the veterans on both sides claimed. This was the only campaign were a spirit of comradeship and respect existed between the opposing armies. They even shared the same popular song, "Lili Marlene".

How did soldiers cope with the desert conditions? The men of the Afrika Korps coped well enough. They were a highly disciplined obedient product of the world's most professional military establishment. The Italians, it is said, brought along their comfort women to make life a little easier. To British and Commonwealth soldiers desert fighting was an old story. Anglo-Egyptian Sudan in the 19th Century, Jordan, Palestine, Mesopotamia (now Iraq), in the 20th Century. They took it in their stride.

From 1940 to 1942 this campaign swung back and forth between El Alamein in Egypt and westward to El Agheila in Cyrenaica. Under General Wavell, General O'Connor a daring and imaginative commander, succeeded in destroying a large part of the Italian forces in Libya at Beda Fomm, in December 1940. February 1941 the Afrika Korps arrived on the scene commanded by General Erwin Rommel. A bold and highly respected soldier indeed. The Afrika Korps was about to become famous and show its ability.In Britain unknown desert place names became famous. Benghazi, Gazala, Bardia, Mersa Matruh, and Tobruk.

By July 1942 Rommel's successes had run there course. His long supply lines from Italy via Tripoli were harassed by the Royal Navy, RAF and commonwealth squadrons. He was stopped in his tracks a short distance west of the railway stop at El Alamein, a location that was to win a roomy place in British military history. Tobruk under a second siege had fallen to Rommel. General Auchinleck relieved General Ritchie and took command in the field himself.

Tobruk's fall was a blow to Churchill. He decided that new blood should conduct operations. He wanted to appoint General Sir Henry Maitland "Jumbo" Wilson. He also favoured Lieutenant General Richard "Straffer" Gott. But Gott's luck ran out; killed when flying in a Air Force transport aircraft shot down by the Luftwaffe. General Sir Alan Brooke suggested Montgomery. Churchill concurred. An unknown man outside army circles Lieutenant General Sir Bernard Law Montgomery was a man dedicated to the profession of arms; a soldier to the marrow in his bones. Montgomery's CinC would be General Sir Harold Alexander. An officer and a gentleman to his fingertips if ever there was one. For effect Monty, as he became known, wore a wide-brimmed Australian slouch hat which displayed a number of regimental and commonwealth badges. He ruthlessly fired senior subordinates who did not "measure up". He courted the correspondents. Putting them, "in the picture". Monty would, "...clear this chap Rommel out of Africa once and for all". Thus spoke the British Army's greatest self-publicist! The scribes lapped it up. Monty's self confidence seemed a dangerous weapon in itself.

Rommel decided to strike at the Eighth Army's defensive line which ran forty miles from the coast southwards to the Qattara Depression. Montgomery was building up Eighth's strength at the time. It was called the Battle of Alam Halfa. With air support the ground forces hit back hard. Rommel withdrew.

The offensive at Alamein opened up with a heavy artillery barrage. After twelve days of bitter fighting coupled with ceaseless air attacks by the RAF the Afrika Korps commenced the long retreat from Egypt into Cyrenaica, across Tripolitania, through the Libyan capitol, Tripoli, and into Tunisia. So after two years of a long hard slog the Eighth Army was on a winning streak. Fortune smiled upon the soldier's faces. In the minds of the British people, fed up with defeat and starved of victory, the BBC radio announcement was a delightful shock to the system. At last they had something to cheer about. As the young woman stated in the film, "There's plenty more where that comes from". There was indeed.

In Tripoli, the show place of Mussolini's much vaunted African Empire this documentary ends. Mister Churchill took the salute of the Eighth Army veterans. The Master of Ceremonies? Monty of course, brilliant but insufferable, wearing the now-famous black beret, displaying a general's cap badge and the badge of the Royal Armoured Corps. The victory parade was symbolic in another way. For this long bitterly fought campaign was Britain's imperial swan song. From now on, America would take an increasingly leading role in this worldwide conflict.

Apart from the British divisions there were also Australian, New Zealand, South African, and Indian divisions. And those brave little warriors from Nepal, the fearless Gurkhas. And here in this desert wastes was born the legendary SAS. Commonwealth commanders served the cause well. Generals Pinenaar, South Africa, Freyberg, New Zealand Morshead, and Air Vice Marshal Coningham, Australia.

And what of the two, three, and four star generals? Some known, some not so well known. Some relieved by higher command. Generals, Archie Wavell, Alan Cunningham, and Claude Auchinleck, overshadowed by Harold Alexander and Bernard Montgomery. Others? Neil Ritchie, Oliver Leese, Willoughby Norrie, Herbert Lumsden, Briggs, Dorman-Smith, Godwin Austen, Gatehouse and Brian Horrocks. Some did, "measure up", and some didn't, before and after Montgomery arrived on the scene.

And Field Marshal Rommel? He was recalled from North Africa. Had he fallen into Allied hands he would have avoided the July '44 plot against Hitler. Survived in Allied captivity and lived out his remaining years in retirement.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A Very Important Documentary about World War II!
Sylviastel23 April 2011
This documentary was awarded an Academy Award during the midst of World War II. With film and stock footage, please be aware that quality may have effected it while viewing over time. The documentary covers Germany's General Rommel and British General Montgomery in the desert. This documentary shows actual footage of Rommel and Hitler themselves. During the making of this film, four British Army cameramen were killed, seven were wounded, and six were taken prisoners by the Germans. Wartime even during World War II was a dangerous time for even the cast and crew who were determined to show the world the enemy's path of destruction in the desert. World War II's primary motive was to overtake and control the world. Hitler and his men were on their way but thankfully they lost. But it was too late for the millions of casualties of war and the survivors left to rebuild and construct after wards.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
extremely educational
oscar-3520 September 2012
Warning: Spoilers
*Spoiler/plot- 1943, A film showing the operations of many Allied units to support the eventual winning back of North Africa and preparations to start the Italian campaign.

*Special Stars- Narrator: JD Hodson

*Theme- Cooperation and planning wins wars.

*Trivia/location/goofs- British documentary. North Africa battles shown with captured German footage. This film is a very successful documentary of this time.

*Emotion- An enjoyable documentary made up of live action combat or newsreel footage. However, there are the unpleasant shots of injured Americans and killed Germans. But it is extremely educational and does what a narrative simulated war film can do.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Essential world war 2 footage
nickenchuggets13 September 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Desert Victory is a British film made in 1943 which focuses on the north african theater of the second world war from the allies' perspective. Therefore, it follows the UK and America's efforts to drive Italian and German Afrika Korps forces from the continent, the latter being commanded by the brilliant and dangerous strategist Erwin Rommel. This premise makes Desert Victory very similar to another film made during world war 2: Frank Capra's Tunisian Victory. The latter focuses mainly on successes the allies experienced during the war in north africa and doesn't really talk about the losses. Strangely, Tunisian Victory was intended by Capra to be a successor to Desert Victory, but Desert Victory ended up winning an oscar, which Capra's film couldn't accomplish. Part of the reason why may be the fact that a ship containing a lot of combat footage was sunk, meaning Capra had to get John Huston to reshoot a lot of it, but I'm getting off topic. While Desert Victory may be slightly older than Capra's film, in my opinion it is better. It has a better emphasis on what the british did in north africa against the germans, such as when the british captured and held the Libyan port city of Tobruk for over an entire year. No matter how hard Rommel attacked the city with siege weapons and armored vehicles, the defenders refused to crack and the town became as much a symbol of british defiance as Churchill's bulldog face. The film also covers other well known battles of world war 2 that took place in the desert, such as El Alamein and Tripoli, the libyan capital. British field marshal Bernard Montgomery would continue hammering away at the axis forces until nothing less than total victory was achieved. Surprisingly, the film makes use of lots of german newsreel footage, which is odd because it raises of the question of how they got their hands on it. Probably my favorite thing about Desert Victory is how one of its central "characters" is a man who has been painted as a godsend throughout the decades despite being a literal nazi: Erwin Rommel. He is so venerated (even by the descendants of those who fought against him) that people seem convinced he did not have strong political feelings one way or the other. He was close friends with Hitler, but did not condone what he or his regime stood for. This myth regarding Rommel's innocent nature is so widespread that there's even a wikipedia article on it. In any case, it is sad that after fighting so tenaciously for his country in the deserts, he was forced to commit suicide for being implicated in the 1944 bomb plot that almost cost Hitler his life. Rommel was given a state funeral and was said to have fallen in battle. His wife and son looking on knew the truth. It might seem out of place to mention all this here, but that's simply because Desert Victory does not have much to it. It's a very basic film that specializes in educating the viewer about important battles in north africa that would shape world war 2, but that's pretty much it. As somebody who has always liked reading about this war, it doesn't matter to me that Desert Victory is just focused on a specific setting. It is still a crucial part of war history.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Hit them for six
chaswe-2840230 October 2016
Warning: Spoilers
It must be admitted that not a great deal is made clear by this film, except that Britain defeated Germany. What were the relative numbers on the German and British sides ? We weren't told. An excellent review by a British viewer in Liverpool, as well as other reviews, gives us the reasons. The film was issued in 1943, and had to be cautious in what it revealed. The quality on my disc cannot be described as good, and I'm basically left with numerous images of guns blazing, tanks rolling, aircraft flying, soldiers on both sides dead, dying and captured, without a great deal of explanation of what and where it is all happening. There is just about enough description of the tactics to provide some sort of a picture. One of the other reviewers made it clear that Rommel lost because of his lengthy and vulnerable supply line, as well as his relatively useless Italian allies. Why was he called the Desert Fox ?

Heartening to see that the Limeys were actually participating in WWII. After noting Montgomery's reputation in Patton and Saving Private Ryan, and understanding that the heroic Americans had triumphed everywhere, I wasn't entirely sure.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed