Allegheny Uprising (1939) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
27 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Those Pennsylvania Farmers
bkoganbing27 July 2006
John Wayne's first non-western after his breakthrough role with Stagecoach was with his Stagecoach co-star Claire Trevor and is what I would call a colonial. For myself I've always thought of westerns as films that are located west of the Mississippi and this one isn't even west of the Appalachians. Nevertheless it's a good follow-up film to Stagecoach and the first of about two dozen loan outs that Republic's Herbert J. Yates charged for the Duke's services. This one was made under the RKO banner.

Neil Swanson's novel The First Rebel was the source for this film and later on in a film based in the same post Seven Year's War American colonial period, Cecil B. DeMille would make a big budgeted spectacle of another of Swanson's novels, turning The Judas Tree into Unconquered.

RKO didn't quite put the production values of a DeMille film into Allegheny Uprising, but it still is a good action film and a plus on John Wayne's career.

What Alleghany Uprising shows are some of the seeds of the American Revolution. The Treaty of Paris that ended the Seven Years War which was known on the North American continent as the French and Indian War gave generous peace terms to the Indians. The British took over the French guarantees of no white settlement west of the Appalachians. That was easier said than done.

John Wayne is the leader of a group of settlers located in the Alleghany river area and he's pretty upset that trade is still permitted with the tribes. Brian Donlevy and Ian Wolfe are a pair of unscrupulous traders who are devilishly shrewd in gaining their objectives. They play British captain George Sanders like a violin, stirring him up against Wayne and the settlers. Of course the trade goods that Donlevy and Wolfe are peddling consist of rum and tomahawks.

George Sanders has the key role in this film. He really does represent the worst of the British military character. Not a bad person at heart really, but pigheaded and stubborn with not a clue as to how he's being tricked and used by Donlevy and Wolfe. Usually Sanders whether playing villains or heroes is usually someone of intelligence. This was a radical departure for him, but he carries it off.

Sanders also represents in microcosm the type that in dealing with the American colonies created the climate for the American Revolution down the road. The key scene in the film is when Wayne remarks how Sanders just refuses to understand the settlers and their ways.

Claire Trevor plays a colonial Calamity Jane, a real frontier girl who is both in love and exasperated with the Duke. A nice follow-up for her to the almost tragic Dallas in Stagecoach.

You'll see such stalwart supporting characters as Chill Wills who has a song to sing in this first film with John Wayne, Wilfrid Lawson, Eddie Quillan, Olaf Hytten, and Robert Barrat. Barrat is my favorite among the supporting cast. There's a court martial in the climax scene where the very shrewd Mr. Barrat who is the civil magistrate in the area, turns defense lawyer and with some interesting ballistic evidence turns the tables on the villains.

The Pennsylvania farmers were one independent lot. Not to be forgotten is the fact that this area in refusing to pay the tax on whiskey, precipitated the first challenge to U.S. government authority thirty years later in the Whiskey Rebellion. Of course George Washington was shrewd enough to use just the right amount of authority in dealing with the situation.
36 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
"Still the same shameless wench."
utgard1423 April 2014
John Wayne leads a group of colonial settlers that have to contend with Indians, as well as stuffy Brit George Sanders and traitorous Brian Donlevy. Despite the colonial setting, it's essentially a western. Wayne's great but Claire Trevor steals the show as a loud-mouthed tomboy in love with him who wants to fight alongside the menfolk. The rest of the cast is solid. Lots of action in this one and more than a little comedy. The fast pace helps a lot. This is loosely based on real people and events. Made the same year as the classic Stagecoach. This isn't on that level but it's a very entertaining historical drama and pseudo-western.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Fast Paced Western
maughancannes-28 March 2003
This is a decently made RKO western, made a few years before the genre became truly great (1946 - 1962), though released the same year as the first classic of the genre ("Stagecoach"). Despite some heavy-handed romantic-comedy moments, the movie moves like one of its galloping horses - at one point, Wayne is wrongly accused of murder, is put in gaol, quells an outside mob riot from inside his cell, stands trial, and is freed all within 7 minutes !
18 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Great, forgotten film
Mike Sh.4 September 2001
This 1939 movie, a period piece set in the early 1760's, comes from the days when John Wayne took second billing to Claire Trevor, as he had that same year in "Stagecoach", the film that made Wayne a star. It is a somewhat forgotten film, but it doesn't deserve to be, since it tells a really good story in a really entertaining fashion. And it has a great cast.

Wayne plays Jim Smith, leader of a band of settlers of southern Pennsylvania's Conococheague Valley in the years immediately following the French and Indian War. Smith & Company's efforts to deal with a crooked Indian trader (veteran Hollywood villain Brian Donlevy) are hampered by an officious, pig-headed, and not-too-bright British Army officer (veteran Hollywood stuffed shirt George Sanders). Smith also has to deal with the local tomboy (Miss Trevor) who has a deep yearning for adventure and excitement, as well as the affections of Jim Smith.

Wilfrid Lawson also appears as MacDougall, the rowdy Scotsman who loves fighting almost as much as drinking. John F. Hamilton is the eloquent but enigmatic sidekick, known as the Professor. Moroni Olsen, possessor of one of filmdom's coolest names, is the stalwart Tom Calhoon. Veteran second-string Hollywood villain Ian Wolfe is the evil trader's Evil sidekick. Also appearing in small roles are Chill Wills (another cool name) and Charles Middleton, heretofore best known as the stone-faced Fredonian prosecutor in "Duck Soup".

Interesting historical detail: in a courtroom scene, a witness is asked to "swear or affirm" that what he's about to say is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. This should serve to remind the viewer that Pennsylvania was a Quaker Commonwealth. (Quakers don't believe in swearing, you see...)
28 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The successful stars of "Stagecoach", are back on board in this Western action drama
ma-cortes31 March 2020
"Allegheny Uprising" is a spectacular saga with an outlandish setting, as it is set in an America pre-revolutionary, an America still under British rule. Sixteen years before the revolutionary war, in Pennsylvania valley, a group of British colonists spoke with guns in defend of liberty. This is the story of James Smith and his black boys, and a chapter of history long lost in the Allegheny mountains. It begins with an exchange of prisoners between the French and British. Canadian border 1759. Stars John Wayne as James Smith who battles against Delaware Indians, smugglers : led by Brian Donlevy, who are selling weapons and licour to Indians, and a tyrannical British commandant, George Sanders and his soldiers. As Wayne will stop at nothing to stop the bad guys sell guns to Indians.

This is an entertaining film with noisy action, battles, romance and comedy . After the hit of Stagecoach, RKO hurriedly put their new hero cowboy , The Duke John Wayne, and his partenaire Claire Trevor in another Western, but this time resulted to be a lesser effort. Pretty good man and support cast accompany the brave and stuborn protagonists. Not a bad movie, but not memorable, either, however, being entertaining enough . Wayne gives a nice acting as the frontiersman who clashes with a British commander in order to stop his injustice. His leading lady Claire Trevor provides a silly acting and overacting, at times, as the obstinate sweetheart chasing Wayne here and there. And notorious secondaries appearing, such as : George Sanders as British military commander, Brian Donlevy as the villain seller, Wilfrid Lawson, John Hamilton, Moroni Oldsen, Roger Barrat, Ian Wolfe, Eddie Quillan and a thin Chill Wills. It packs an atmospheric cinematography in black and white by Nicholas Musuraka, a bit later on, to become one of the best Film Noir cameramen as well as John Alton, John Seitz or Sol Polito. Furthermore, it delivers a thrilling and evocative musical score. The motion picture, lavishly produced by RKO/Pandro S. Berman, was regular but professionally directed by William A Seiter 1890-1964. He was a fine craftsman who diected films of all kinds of genres as drama, thriller , musical, Western, romantic comedy, such as : In person, Stowaway, Dimples, Room service, The moon's our home, Susannah of the Mounties, It is a date , Nice girl?, You were never lovelier, Lady takes a chance, Destroyer, Little giant, I will be yours, Up in the Central Park, One touch of Venus, Borderline, Make haste to live. Rating : 6/10. Decent, passable and acceptable, though very inferior to Stagecoach . Also available on horrible colorized version.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not a bad idea, but pedestrian writing and a cowboy-like script don't help
planktonrules24 May 2007
The idea of placing John Wayne in the Colonies during the final years of the French-Indian War (called the "Seven Years' War" in Europe) was an inspired idea. Few films have focused on this era and it was nice to see something different. The problem was that although it was a change of locale, the film itself seemed all too much like a typical cowboy and Indian film. So much of the dialog was actually identical to stuff you'd see in films set a hundred years later--only the tribes' names were changed. As a result, the film just tended to blend into the huge pile of John Wayne westerns--and not with the great ones like the Cavalry Trilogy or THE SEARCHERS but instead the mediocre ones made in the 30s and early 40s. Claire Trevor as Wayne's main squeeze was in some ways very good (it was nice to see a less passive style of woman) but in other ways she was a 1930s gal transported to 1758! Women in that era simply did NOT run around in men's clothes, out-shoot men and insist on being treated like "one of the guys". Since I am a history teacher, I found the film frustrating and completely anachronistic. For a much better film made around the same time about Colonial America, try watching the usually overlooked HOWARDS OF VIRGINIA--a Cary Grant film better in just about every way.
9 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"If you're going to hang, I'll hang with you!"
classicsoncall11 May 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Well this is a new one on me, I didn't think John Wayne fought any battles prior to the Civil War. Played almost along the lines of a typical B Western, the film's story line and production values are a slight notch above, with Claire Trevor joining Wayne in another film released the same year as "Stagecoach" in which they both appeared. Trevor's character here is not much more than a caricature, as she's constantly grumbling over her status as a woman who's not allowed to take part in the rough and tumble world the men around her find themselves in. Thinking about it now, she was the only woman in the entire picture; how realistic was that?

It struck me while watching that this was one film that probably would have benefited from the color treatment, what with all those Redcoats around causing dismay for the Allegheny settlers. Wayne's character Jim Smith and company rebel against the British for allowing trade to continue with marauding Indians, but except for one brief skirmish, the Indians aren't much of a factor in the story. It's those thieving, conniving traders in league with the Brits.

If nothing else, the film forced me to search my brain to recall bits and pieces I learned in parochial school about the French and Indian War and the new 'American' spirit of freedom and independence. With the story taking place a decade and a half prior to the Revolutionary War, it's a somewhat different kind of Western taking place East of the Mississippi with the good guys trading their white hats for coonskin caps.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Entertaining frontier tale (and not just for Wayne's colonial mullet)
a_chinn3 September 2017
John Wayne plays a wavy haired, coonskin-cap wearing frontiersman. That's about all you need to know about this entertaining though thoroughly routine colonial tale of Wayne taking on corrupt British captain George Sanders. Claire Trevor plays the love interest, who falls for Wayne despite his mullet.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
About Average, and Disappointing Considering
LeonLouisRicci24 March 2016
Disappointing and Rather Flat Historical Costume Adventure that has John Wayne (the year He became a real Movie Star, after Stagecoach) as a Salt of the Earth Pennsylvanian and His band of "Merry Men" having to put up with Marauding Indians and those Uppity Brits.

Claire Trevor is Top Billed and has many a Scenes where She Tries to be "One of the Boys" and Tags Along with Long Rifle in hand. She is Thwarted at every turn by the Macho Men. One of the many "Comedy" Scenes has Her almost Succeeding until She is told to take off Her Shirt (she is in disguise as a painted up Indian). Ha Ha.

This is a Movie where a lot of Guns are Fired but very few Hit their Target. Some of the time On Purpose. It has a Short Running Time and things move along briskly but not without some Clunk and Awkwardness. Trevor is Borderline Over the Top and Her Father's Happy Drunk anticipates John Ford's Fascination with the Type.

Overall, George Sanders Steals the Show as a British Officer and His Contempt and Surprise at just how Defiant these Ruffians are is again, Comical, at times and it isn't meant to be. Wayne says at one point, and this is the whole purpose of This Thing, something like, "I guess you Brits will never understand our ways."

Overall, Worth a Watch for Wayne's Breakout Year, but the Film Feels all Wrong. Average or a Tad Below for its Kind, Time, and Place.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
If you're going to hang, I'll hang with you. That's the least you can let me do.
lastliberal23 May 2007
John Wayne took second billing on this film to Claire Trevor. He wasn't a star yet.

This is a forgettable film that takes place after the French and Indian wars in Pennsylvania. It came out the same year as Stagecoach.

Some whites were trading with the Indians and this caused problems for the settlers as the British were busy expanding the frontier. The locals took it upon themselves to solve the problem.

There wasn't anything very memorable about the film and it really wasn't worth staying up for. It is just another look at Wayne outside a cowboy movie.
2 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Has Some Amusement Value
aimless-4626 May 2006
John Wayne had been making low budget movies for almost 15 years when he starred with Claire Trevor in the William Seiter directed "Allegheny Uprising". He must have felt his career was going backwards as the production values here are second rate even by the marginal standards of his earlier films. Cast before the release of "Stagecoach", he and Trevor were given a more central role in "Allegheny Uprising" as it is not an ensemble piece like "Stagecoach".

The new popularity of the two B-Movie actors required P. J. Wolfson to alter his adaptation of Neil Swanson's novel "The First Rebel". In place of his straight historical fiction action- adventure tale (based on the Smith's Rebellion and Fort Loudoun in southern Pennsylvania) Wolfson was forced to add a romance and pad Trevor's role. Unfortunately adapting a novel to the screen is difficult enough without having to insert a character utterly irrelevant to a story already too expansive for easy adaptation. Contemporary viewers will find the forced insertion of Trevor into most of the scenes rather puzzling, at least in part because she has little going for herself as an actress or a screen presence. The younger John Wayne was much better when paired with talented leading ladies like Ella Raines and Cecilia Parker.

Set in Pennsylvania's Conococheague Valley in 1759, Wayne plays title character James Smith who returns to the valley with a friend called The Professor (John Frank Hamilton). They find the local British commander (George Sanders) a martinet and a local civilian (Brian Donley) trading contraband goods (whiskey and weapons) with the Indians, in league with some corrupt soldiers.

Trevor plays Janie MacDougall, a loud tomboy who loves Smith and manages to insert herself into his affairs at every turn.

1939 was not a good time for a movie which portrayed our soon to be allies (insert the British here) as stupid and corrupt. And southern California was not a good location for shooting a film about colonial America. There are far too many shots of grassy, almost treeless, California valleys to maintain the necessary geographical illusion. Also jarring is the contemporary dialogue which leaves you expecting Mickey Rooney and Lewis Stone to pull up outside the fort in the family sedan.

When not painful, the inattention to period detail is unintentionally amusing. My favorite scene involves the British soldiers laughing at the idea of the settlers taking over the fort. It will remind you of the "Robin Huck" episode of "Huckleberry Hound" where he exhorts his merry men to "yuk it up a bit" and they respond by going "yuk, yuk, yuk".

All in all, a weak example of the B-movie product.

Then again, what do I know? I'm only a child.
10 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Forgotten Gem Lost Amongst The Greatest Movie Year's Sparklers
oldblackandwhite19 August 2011
No wonder 1939 is widely regarded as Hollywood's best year of all time! With all the sparkling jewels produced that year, such as Gone With The Wind, Goodbye, Mr. Chipps, The Private Lives Of Elizabeth And Essex, Union Pacific, Stagecoach, The Roaring Twenties, and Dodge City, RKO's relatively unambitious production Allegheney Uprising was just a pearl on the necklace. But this unpretentious yet stunningly beautiful picture of colonial life on the frontier and events setting the stage for the American Revolution is one of the best movies ever made.

This movie is an absolutely thrilling from the beginning to the end, one knockout scene after another, directed with precision and panache by William Seiter, almost non-stop action and drama. So breathtakingly fast paced yet so smoothly edited, it seems as if two hours worth of movie has been crammed into 80 minutes of running time. All is swept along by an rousing, grand operatic score by British composer Anthony Collins. Producer P. J. Wolfson's script is intelligent with sharp, colorful dialog consistent with Eighteenth Century speech patterns. Allegheney Uprising is beautifully photographed in the luminous, sensuous black and white common to pictures of this Golden Era. The sets and costumes are superb, painting an authentic picture of colonial frontier life. Those who say it should have been in color or that the colorized version is better need to wash out their mouths with a bar of colonial lye soap. The entire tone of the picture would have been changed, and it is virtually perfect as is.

Allegheney Uprising is beautifully acted by a cast led by John Wayne and Claire Trevor. Both fresh from their triumph in Stagecoach, Wayne and Trevor must have been anxious to prove it wasn't a fluke, that they were in fact top star potential. Both do so in style. Wayne, as the leader of the Allegheney mountain region's "lawful rebellion" against British misrule, is much more relaxed, mature, and confident than in Stagecoach. While Stagecoach raised him to the ranks of stardom, Allegheney Uprising proved he was there to stay. Ms Trevor, as the leather-clad tomboy in love with Wayne, gives one of her liveliest and most charming performances, refreshingly unlike the hard-bitten moll which was her typical roll both previously and later. She was quoted as saying that an actress should never fall in love with her leading man, but that she always did. It is obvious here that in this their second picture together she and the young he-man Wayne have a "simpatico". In support George Sanders plays to perfection the stern, dutiful, aristocratic British Army officer antagonistic to the surly colonists, while Brian Donlevy provides his usual sneering villain as the rum and gun runner to the menacing heathen savages. But it is Wilfrid Lawson who virtually dominates the picture with his colorful, exuberant portrayal of Trevor's riotous, boozy, seldom-home father. Some will find his acting over-the-top, but his character as portrayed represents one of the messy but likable hard case types who were common on the early frontier and necessary for its settlement. Moroni Olsen, Robert Barrat, and Chill Wills add their always reliable support.

Allegheney Uprising is a thrilling and beautifully realized picture of early America and the birth of our traditions of freedom and independence. It is a prime example of the craft of Old Hollywood movie making at its peak. Exhillirating, thoroughly enjoyable entertainment from the Golden Era. Highly recommended!
16 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Fun Wayne - Allegheny Uprising
arthur_tafero21 July 2021
This film is bearable for two reasons; one, because George Sanders, one of my screen icons, is in it. It is impossible for him to make a bad film. The second reason is because the film taught me something I diddnt know before; that the American Revolution actually began in Pennsylvania, not Massachusetts. The Black Boys predated the Revolutionary War by 15 years. And while they did not engage in full scale rebellion, they sure let the British know who was in charge in Pennsylvania. A fun film to watch to learn about the French and Indian War, which I mistakenly thought was a war between the French and American Indians. Our nun, Sister Aloysius hated Protestants, and the English were Protestant, so she sided with the Catholic French when teaching us that period of history. You can easily see why I got this period so messed up. Enjoy the film.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
English Law and Liberties - American and British Style
Gallus8 July 2000
I watched this film because, after seeing THE PATRIOT (2000), I wanted to see an another perspective on the American Revolution.

The contrast is refreshing. Whereas Mel Gibson and his bunch of cut-throats often sound and act as if they had come straight out of THE TURNER DIARIES, John Wayne and his own band of irregulars live according to the principles of another gospel - that of law and order, western style. The film is indeed a western, in spite of the geographical and historical settings - the mountains of Western Pennsylvania, 15 years before the Boston Tea Party. More specifically, it is a glorified version of the typical B-movie western of the era, which often starred John Wayne, was often shot in exactly the same locations, and always featured the same formulaic story-line and motley collection of stock characters, such as the soft-spoken community leader, the wild mountaineer who talks and acts so funny, the tomboy love interest, who would like so much to be treated like a guy, but cannot, because she is *only* a girl, etc. The main difference, of course, is one of scale and production value : this is not a cheaply mid-length program filler, but a full-blown feature film in which enough talent and production value has been invested to sustain interest from the beginning to the end, even some 60 years later - and this in spite of a few dated scenes and some awkward moments of political incorrectedness (e.g. the questionable philosophical adage Çthe only friendly Indian is a dead IndianÈ is quoted approvingly).

The film, as suggested above, is based on the central classical theme of the western genre : the implementation of law and order on a wild and untamed country. In this case, however, the familiar story is told with a novel twist. The author of the screenplay has remembered that American law is, in fact, English law, but adapted to the peculiar circumstances of the new country. The pre-Revolutionary setting has provided him with an opportunity to oppose the two understandings of the same legal tradition - the new, American, understanding of English law represented by James Smith (John Wayne), a nation-builder and a free spirit who does not always play by the rules, but abides by the spirit of the law in his attempts to curb illegal liquor and arms trading with Indians, and the old, British, view, as represented by Captain Swanson (George Sanders) an upright, but unimaginative and incredibly obtuse military officer of a far-away Crown who does not seem to know of any other way to apply the law, but to the letter, regardless of common sense and consequences. In his own words : ÇI am a soldier, sir. They could have been carrying the murder of my own father if they had a permit for them. I would have defended them with my own life.È The point of the story is both that the clash between the Britain and America was inevitable and that they would eventually be reconciled because of their deep shared faith in the same ideals of justice - ultimately, it will be observed, it is the British General Gage who steps in to resolve the dispute between soldiers and colonials in a remarkably fair and even-handed manner.

We are very far from the exercise in quasi-racist British-bashing characteristic of THE PATRIOT! However, the two films have this in common that they fail to make their British villain credible. In the case of THE PATRIOT, this is due both to Robert RodatÕs script - all in black and white - and the acting, for Jason IsaacsÕ main asset, sad to say, seems to be his uncongenial face. George Sanders, on the other hand, is one of the greatest character actors specializing in villainy that Hollywood ever had. (Even his stints in BATMAN and THE MAN FROM U.N.C.L.E. are very much worth seeing!) He had the face - and so much more : the style (ÇRemove this barbarian from the courtroom!È - Who could have said it more contemptuously?) Unfortunately, there is little that he can do to lend genuine human substance to the cardboard unidimensional character entrusted to his art. The scriptwriter seems to have meant to depict a specimen of obdurate military stupidity (British style) closely patterned on the Captain Bligh of Charles Laughton from four years earlier (MUTINY ON THE BOUNTY, Oscar for Best Picture in 1935), but, evidently, he lacked the means of his ambitions. Sanders still makes the best of the uneven material and he has his moments, most notably the scene when, besieged in his fort with his troops, Swanson orders that the soldiers who caught napping be flogged, and yet treats kindly the one man whom he actually finds sleeping on duty.
25 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Surprisingly entertaining
Leofwine_draca16 October 2019
Warning: Spoilers
THE FIRST REBEL is another of John Wayne's surprisingly entertaining '30s-era westerns, made with lots of enthusiasm and effort when it comes to depicting large numbers of soldiers and rebels, adding an air of authenticity sometimes lacking in the genre. Wayne plays the usual affable fellow, forced into becoming a rebel thanks to the machinations of the villainous Brian Donlevy, a couple of years before he became known for playing Quatermass. There's a feisty blonde, some decent stand-offs, a pompous George Sanders, and plenty of incident to make it a fast-moving watch.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The First Rebel (UK title)
coltras351 April 2024
John Wayne stars as Jim Smith , a leader of the 'Black Boys' who opposed the traders dealing with Indians in the mid-1700s. When an English officer places the goods under military protection, Smith and his men have no option but to fight for their rights.

Known in the USA as the 'Allegheny Uprising' the First Rebel stars John Wayne as a leader of a group of settlers located in the Alleghany river area, who goes up against Brian Donlevy's villainous trader. It's a spirited adventure set around 1760's, hence coonskin caps, musket rifles and Delaware Indians. Claire Trevor goes a little over the top as a girl who goes ga-ga over Wayne. George Sanders plays a British Captain but surprisingly not strictly a villain - just a snooty stubborn man manipulated by Donlevy.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The Duke in the Alleghenies
Uriah4319 September 2018
This film essentially begins with two Colonial settlers by the names of "James Smith" (John Wayne) and "the Professor" (John F. Hamilton) being granted their freedom after a prisoner-of-war exchange between the French and the British during the French and Indian War. Upon their return to their village in Pennsylvania they are greeted by a young woman named "Janie MacDougall" (Claire Trevor) who is the daughter of the tavern owner and hopelessly in love with James--to the point that she thought that they were actually betrothed before his capture. Be that as it may, their reunion is short-lived as all of the available men of the village are immediately dispatched to another settlement 20 miles away which was attacked by the Delaware Indians who proceeded to take a few hostages. Upon subsequently freeing the hostages they then persuade the local British authorities to cease trade with the Indians in order to prevent the sale of arms to them. Unfortunately, the decree is not enforced as thoroughly as it should have been due to the incompetence of the British military commander in the area by the name of "Captain Swanson" (George Sanders) who becomes a major liability to Colonial efforts to prevent an Indian uprising and secure peace. Now rather than reveal any more I will just say that this was a decent Western which is somewhat dated and suffers as a result. Even so it was worth the time spent and might be of some interest to viewers in search of a film of this type. Slightly above average.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Pennsylvania settlers' trials, tribulations and treason
shakercoola10 March 2019
An American historical drama; A story about a frontiersman, James Smith, leading a group of Pennsylvania men in a nine-month rebellion against British rule, ten years before the outbreak of the American Revolutionary War. It is loosely based on the historical event known as the Black Boys Rebellion of 1765, or Allegheny Uprising and titled so on the film's American market release. For a film with a large cast, it is directed in quick pace and almost non-stop action. The expressionistic black-and-white photography captures well the adventurous period in American culture. As a lead actor Clare Trevor does not feature heavily, but when on screen she is fiesty and her love interest with John Wayne is amusing. The choice of music is curious - upbeat in scenes of intended high drama and tension. George Sanders gives good support as an exemplary British officer snob. All in all, not an engrossing feature but it has its moments and there is sufficient scale for the subject matter.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A Spirited Depiction of Early America
edalweber11 June 2014
I think that this movie has been very much underrated and over criticized.As far as they way the actors speak, it is simply not practical to give them all lessons in how people spoke in those days.And many of the audience would't understand a lot of the dialog. After all, movies about Rome aren't made with everyone speaking Latin. As far as the way Claire Trevor dressed, well there is plenty of evidence that women on the fringes of civilization often dressed "practical",particularly young tomboyish ones Some people have referred to George Saunders as a "villain". Which he is not,Brian Donlevy and his men are the villains. He does cause trouble by his obvious contempt for the "yokels", and his insistence of going strictly by the book. But there is no doubt that if he had known Donlevy was violating the law by carrying forbidden goods,misusing his permit, that he would have arrested him on the spot. That is the one weak point in the plot. If when the fort surrendered, instead of having the troops march out and grabbing Donlevy and his men, Smith had exposed the whiskey kegs in the flour barrel and other frauds, the farmers could have left the fort and left Saunders in charge. Once Saunders had seen that Donlevy had deceived General Gage, and was desecrating the Royal permit in that way, he would never have protected the culprits.He was an honorable man, just stiff necked. He would have swallowed his pride and done his duty. This is a rousing movie about its times,and well captures the spirit that the colonials showed in those last days before the Revolution,and I think that it should not be judged too harshly on some of its technical shortcomings.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hats off!
dbdumonteil7 December 2010
I have not seen the colorized version but it does not matter for the characters themselves are very colorful;particularly George Sanders as the "aristocratic" straight-faced phoney military man who treats the +Yankees as if they were ripe for exploitation;particularly Claire +Trevor who teamed up with Wayne in "stagecoach" and later would in ,notably ,"the high and the mighty" ,as the tomboy who wants to fight with the men who were still very macho in those troubled times. The story is routine ,and although it takes place in North America ,has a Robin Hood side ,but the actors make it a winner . The first scene when the men are asked to take off their hat is almost comedy.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Excellent History of Early America
vitaleralphlouis2 June 2007
A pre-Revolutionary War frontier movie, when central Pennsylvania was still the frontier; this is a wonderful JOHN WAYNE adventure movie. The main problem is that lovely Claire Trevor wants John Wayne, but Wayne might just as soon keep his freedom. Problem #2 is that bad guys led by Brian Donlevy are into selling liquor and booze to the Indians while the Indians are at war with the settlers.

If you have a choice, see this movie colorized. RKO ought to have made it in color to begin with, but color films were few in 1939. The color is excellent. It enhances the Pennsylvania countryside, the British redcoats, etc. Not all colorizing is great, but this is A+.

Most films made in 2006 and 2007 will have a commercial life of maybe 6 to 9 months; to be forgotten forever. Nobody will be searching in 50 years for any of the junk in today's multiplex. Allegheny Uprising is just one of many films made in 1939 that have endured for 68 years. Released, re-released, re-released again. Then shown on TV, sold on VHS, on DVD. Quality endures, junk dies fast.
8 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Shadow Boxing with the British
dougdoepke14 March 2011
American colonists in Pennsylvania rise up against an English army that allows illegal trading with the Indians.

The movie might be more properly titled San Fernando Valley Uprising since the terrain is familiar from a thousand matinée Westerns. Still, the producers popped for a bunch of extras with redcoats and also an impressive looking fort that even has realistic tree stumps indicating a cleared forest on the approaches.

To me, however, the movie's a disappointment. More importantly, the material shows why John Ford was such a master of this type of movie— that is,"winning the West" with roistering men and headstrong women, amusing drunks and slippery villains. The trouble here is that there's nothing humorous about the obnoxious drunk (Lawson), while Trevor in a padded part goes way over the top as a tomboy, but worse, she's allowed to interrupt the action just as it gets rolling.

The screenplay doesn't help either. Note that despite all the shooting and confrontations, no redcoat kills a colonist or vice-versa-- a rather strange outcome for an armed "uprising". My guess is that the pre-war year 1939 didn't want to show potential allies against the Nazis killing each other; then again, maybe American or British casualties would have complicated sorting out blame, which otherwise lies with the sneaky traders (Donlevy & Wolfe). Whatever the reason, it remains a pretty unbelievable development, given all the shooting.

On the other hand, Wayne shows potential as an outstanding leader of men, while Sanders is excellent as usual as a literate snob, this time an English officer. I did miss a strong Ward Bond-type as Wayne's buddy instead of the rather foolish professor (Hamilton). Anyway, the elements don't really gel into the kind of action movie that gets remembered. I just wish that superb story teller John Ford had gotten hold of the material first.
10 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Terrific and very underrated
jpadamsca5 February 2017
I've long thought this is one of John Wayne's most suspenseful and overall entertaining films. The story is so well acted and believable that you're actually there. It's easy to see why he is so legendary - he had an on-screen/off-screen presence and ability like few others.

Claire Trevor is also very dynamic here. She's funny, witty, has impeccable timing and is perfectly cast. She brings incredible energy and top-tier talent.

How often can you say you enjoyed every minute of a movie? Far and away, this is a perfect example. Its all around terrific, underrated, and the epitome of a memorable, enjoyable film. I only wish it were longer and available in HD! Warner Brothers - can you deliver for a loyal fan?

Enjoy!
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Trevor, Wayne Solidify Their Star Power
frank412213 April 2019
After Stagecoach, there is was no doubt John Wayne and Claire Trevor were stars. Allegheny Uprising just reaffirms that supposition. Trevor was in high gear from the beginning showing her devotion to Wayne as the Colonist in lawful rebellion against British rule. George Sanders was not the first choice for the role of Brit Captain Swanson but no one could have played it better. Wilfrid Lawson as MacDougall skillfully depicted the spirit of the pre-revolutionary war period. Everyone's favorite villain, Brian Donlevy is relentless in giving the Duke all he can handle. Allegheny Uprising is true gem and highly underrated film depicting an important time in American history.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Very good
SanteeFats25 July 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Claire Trevor actually gets top billing in this one. She is the very fiery daughter of the local inn keeper. She is in love with Wayne who just fobs her off. He doesn't want to be reined in by any female. This is prior to the Revolution and the English are their typical a**holes. There is the crooked rum running arms trader to the Indians. He gets the frontiersmen in trouble with the Redcoats. The locals not only stand up to the Brits but take up arms, capture the fort and things get interesting from there. The nasty bad Indians attack some farms and capture a young girl. This gets the locals up in arms again. They mark up like the Indians and go after them. Claire Trevor wants to go as she can shoot as well as any of them. Wayne doesn't want her to go so says everyone must go shirtless so she has to stay. Every thing ends well for the good guys and the traders get their comeuppance.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed