Living on Love (1937) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Starvation diet.
lianfarrer26 February 2007
Warning: Spoilers
This tepid remake of RAFTER ROMANCE and its predecessors stars James Dunn and Whitney Bourne in the oft-told tale of a man and woman who fall behind on their rent and are forced by their landlord to share a room—but never occupy it at the same time. He sleeps there by day, she by night, and they communicate by leaving each other sarcastic notes complaining about one thing or another. Their contempt quickly escalates into a series of mean-spirited practical jokes: she substitutes paint thinner for his mouthwash, he plants a lobster in her bed, etc.

In the meantime, the two meet in a restaurant and, unaware that they're each other's despised roommate, they fall in love. Further complications ensue when the couple's other romantic interests—bossy sausage heiress Joan Woodbury for him and on-the-make supervisor Franklin Pangborn for her—decide to drop by the boarding house. Rounding out the cast is Solly Ward as the landlord of the "Venus de Milo Arms," Tom Kennedy as Bourne's protective upstairs neighbor, and Ken Terrell and James Fawcett as the Russian-acrobat Ghonoff Brothers. (Like RAFTER ROMANCE, LIVING ON LOVE has Yiddish/Jewish jokes aplenty.) An interesting piece of casting is Etta McDaniel, Hattie's sister, as the landlord's maid, Lizbeth.

Large chunks of the film are copied directly from RAFTER ROMANCE, and the parts that have been changed are for the most part not an improvement. The tricks that Dunn and Bourne play on each other seem more nasty than funny, not to mention hard to believe; if they're so broke they have to share a room, where does she get the money to have an entire menagerie of exotic animals delivered to him, and how does he afford all those alarm clocks he sets to go off when she's trying to sleep?

LIVING ON LOVE neglects the little details that would help establish characters and setting and create a believable world for the audience. We never really get a sense of the poverty of the two leading characters and the shabbiness of their surroundings. We don't see much of their outside relationships and ambitions. And the love that develops between them seems to come out of nowhere.

The film also suffers from zero chemistry between Bourne and Dunn. She's pretty much a cipher, especially in comparison to Ginger Rogers, who really sparkles in RAFTER ROMANCE. Dunn tries hard, but he doesn't have much to work with here. Speaking of poor casting, it's hard to buy Franklin Pangborn, doing his usual prissy routine, as the lecherous womanizer played much more credibly by Robert Benchley in the earlier film.

This tedious B-comedy is of interest only as a long-unseen relic of RKO studios.
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Routine Roommate Remake
movingpicturegal14 April 2007
B-movie remake of 1933's romantic comedy "Rafter Romance". This version features James Dunn as Gary, a struggling artist who lives in a basement apartment and owes on his rent - Whitney Bourne plays Mary, a woman who lives in the same building and hasn't paid her rent in over six months. So - - the well-meaning landlord (who, by the way, has no problem peeping into tenants rooms via the keyhole) gets this bright idea: the two of them can share the apartment and split the cost. He works the night shift, she works by day - so he gets the apartment in the day, she gets it in the night - they go ahead with this plan, but they have never actually seen each other. She immediately thinks he's disgusting (based on the looks of the room) and he thinks she's a spinster, a "small town hick" in town looking for love. They leave each other a series of nasty notes and play some really mean-spirited pranks on each other (like paint remover in his mouth wash bottle, and alarm clocks set all around the room to ring and wake her up). Well, the two of them finally do meet - at a local restaurant without any idea who the other one is. They actually bond via the fact that they both hate their roommate!

This film is mildly interesting, light fare - but lacks chemistry between the two leading stars. I didn't see them ever in this as much of a couple (he actually pronounces himself in "love" with her after just meeting her, but I sure couldn't see it), and the meanness of the tricks they play on each other just left me completely cold - - if this was meant to be funny - it wasn't. In general, this film is pretty so-so - not nearly as good as the earlier version of this, "Rafter Romance". Franklin Pangborn appears in this adding some much needed humor, playing the boss in charge of Mary's sales job selling electric razors. A weak film - mediocre at best.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Living on a 1933 plot
Mike-76426 February 2007
Landlord Eli West needs to pay for his radio, so he leases Mary Wilson's apartment to the Ghonoff Brothers, but West arranges for Mary to live in the basement apartment, which just happens to be rented by struggling artist Gary Martin. No problem, however (thinks West) since Mary works as a saleslady by day, and Gary a night shift trucking manager by night, so they will never have to see each other. Conflicts soon arise with the two not being able to stand the other's habits and each tries to make the other fed up enough to leave. To further complicate things, Mary & Gary have already met and have developed a crush on each other, but circumstances will drive the two to stop seeing the other as well as the fact that the forces are about to reveal their apartment secret together. It's hard to tell if this is better than the 1933 version, Rafter Romance, but it does have its moments as the remake plays more for laughs than the 33 version, but the plot is hardly jointed and there is hardly anything new in this version, as well as downplaying the romantic aspect of the film by not really making us wonder if they will truly fall for each other. Dunn, Bourne, Pangborn, Woodbury, Kennedy, & Ward are all in fine B movie form, and its a fun 60 minutes for all. Rating, 5.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A poor re-tread of an earlier RKO film
planktonrules12 April 2007
Last week, the long-lost RAFTER ROMANCE was shown for the first time on TV. This week, the long-lost remake by the same studio which was made just four years later was shown as well (LIVING ON LOVE). As a result, I had a rare opportunity to see the original and its remake just days apart. By the way, the remaking of films was very common in this era (especially by RKO and Warner Brothers) and often the films were remade as few as two or three years later! While the basic plot of RAFTER ROMANCE was intact, the remake was a pretty sorry film--offering no advantages over the original--NONE. The performances by all the leads were simply better in the 1933 film. Norman Foster and Ginger Rogers were the leads in 1933 and James Dunn and Whitney Bourne (who the heck was THIS?) were the leads in 1937--definite steps down in the acting and charm departments--especially since Ms. Bourne seemed really cruel at times in the film (like when she sold the artist's paintings). Plus, the original charming and cute landlord, George Sidney, was replaced by a comparatively dull guy in the remake. Because of these changes, the magic and sweet nature of the film was mostly gone. Still, it was watchable, but I strongly advise you to seek out RAFTER ROMANCE instead--I just can't imagine anyone preferring this remake.
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Ultralight entertainment for a rainy day
Crispin-312 April 2007
Not having seen the original "Rafter Romance" of which this was a remake, I can only compare it with the many other light comedies of the period. Taken for what it is, a "B" movie (or maybe even "C"), it doesn't do badly.

One of the great virtues of the 1930's and early 40's comedies is their fast-paced dialog, seldom heard today. I can imagine the director snapping his fingers to keep the actors racing along. Good pace and timing can cover a multitude of weaknesses in the script, and this movie rattles right along.

I wasn't rolling in the aisle, but this movie was worth a chuckle or three. If you've got nothing better planned, or you want some amusement on the box while you work on something else, curl up and enjoy -- I got lots of knitting done.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Tepid , pointless remake is no improvement on the original...
Doylenf11 April 2007
TCM's "Lost and Found" series of RKO films continues with yet another remake of RAFTER ROMANCE (with Ginger Rogers and Norman Foster), the story of two people who never meet although they're roommates sharing the same flat. They never meet because they're on different work shifts. It's a story that worked its charm with Ginger but doesn't seem to have the same snap here.

It's familiar ground and this time serves as a vehicle for JAMES DUNN and WHITNEY BOURNE with some comic assistance from FRANKLIN PANGBORN and JOAN WOODBURY. Pangborn has the Robert Benchley role of the lecherous wolf but is slightly less credible with his prissy attitude.

These Depression-era comedies are really hard to relate to today, what with $15 a month rent being a hardship that has to be shared by another. It was a different world in 1937--and clearly, the Depression wasn't quite over. At any rate, this is practically a scene by scene remake of RAFTER ROMANCE with no noticeable improvement in dialog, style or pace. In other words, it's pointless.

Every aspect of the flimsy and familiar plot is badly dated, and the pranks that the two unknown roommates play on each other are more mean spirited than funny. The animal prank scenes (which did not take place in the original) are beyond ridiculous. Nor are any of the other changes an improvement under the feeble direction of Lew Landers.

Summing up: Watch the original and forget this one. It's a real loser.
9 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
These Ships Don't Pass Unnoticed
bkoganbing14 January 2013
Living On Love is a roadshow remake of Rafter Romance that William Powell and Ginger Rogers had done only four years earlier. Someone at RKO must have been stuck for an original story and recycle this one. The slightly less well known James Dunn and Whitney Bourne are in this film as leads.

It's a pleasant enough comedy concerning two people sharing a room at different hours. Whitney is a salesgirl working selling electric shavers for Franklin Pangborn who would like to get better acquainted and she works by day. Her night time roommate is Dunn who is an artist, but works at night as a truck dispatcher.

These two ships that pass in the night don't pass unnoticed and both have habits that annoy. But when they happen to meet there is an attraction that takes the entire running time of the film to bear fruit. Of course neither figure out that the other is the annoying roommate until almost the end of the film.

Living On Love is a pleasant enough screwball comedy with some other good supporting performances by Joan Woodbury as the daughter of the owner of a nearby restaurant that both leads meet at and who has an interest in Dunn. And best of all is Solly Ward as the landlord who for the want of a radio with all kinds of features rents that room with that arrangement to Bourne.

Some of the same comedy situations can also be found in The More The Merrier, a slightly better known film. Even with lesser known leads, Living On Love is your average screwball Thirties comedy much like it's predecessor.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Boarding house comedy
csteidler20 October 2019
Whitney Bourne is behind on her rent. Her landlord doesn't want to kick her out, though...he likes her. The landlord's solution is to have Bourne move into the basement apartment with James Dunn, who is also behind on his rent. Bourne has a daytime job, Dunn works at night - they will never even have to meet.

While that far-fetched setup never quite convinces, this attempt at madcap comedy does have some fun moments.

Dunn is a would-be artist who has somehow captured the fancy of sausage heiress Joan Woodbury. Preferring to make it on his own, Dunn rejects her advances as well the cushy job in her father's sausage factory.

Bourne, meanwhile, has just gotten a job selling electric razors. New roommates Dunn and Bourne have never seen each other but quickly decide they are bitter enemies...and then of course they meet in a restaurant and become friends. Unaware of their ironic situation, Dunn and Bourne romance each other in fits and starts, while continuing to play wicked practical jokes on each other back in the apartment. (She replaces his toothpaste with a tube of paint; he puts a lobster in her bed.)

The stars do their best but weak dialog really limits their ability to come across as charming or intelligent. Otherwise, Tom Kennedy is fine as a big-hearted fellow lodger who drives a cab. Solly Ward plays the landlord and is quite enthusiastic about solving his boarders' problems as well as peeking through their keyholes. Franklin Pangborn is humorous if a bit creepy as the sales manager who coaches his staff of young women on how to sell razors. Joan Woodbury is fun as the pushy society girl who is used to getting her way.

Overall, it's really not too good but it's a cute story that has a few laughs.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Better Than the '33 version
hightidex14 December 2007
Maybe I just like Whitney Bourne better than Ginger Rogers but I liked this one better than "Rafter Romance". It is 12 minutes shorter so it has no filler. It is short and sweet. It "feels" more like a silent film than the earlier version because it really hops along.

I like Ginger Rogers in "Major & The Minor", otherwise, I cant think of a movie I really like her in. Maybe "Vivacous Lady". She's OK in the Fred Astaire movies but he is so smug I find them barely watchable. Whitney Bourne on the other hand is a super gorgeous woman that I would like to see a lot more of.

IMDb wants a few more lines out of me to print this: I find it interesting that Whitney Bourne was born in 1914 and died in 1988 and her female rival in this movie, Joan Woodbury, was born a year later and died a year later. What are the chances of THAT!
2 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Rote Remake of RAFTER ROMANCE
boblipton31 December 2023
James Dunn has quit his job and gone to work at lower pay on the graveyard shift. Whitney Bourne hasn't worked regularly, and is now selling electric shavers on commission. Neither can afford their rooms, so landlord Solly Ward lets them split a room: Dunn gets it in the day, Miss Bourne at night. They don't know each other and regularly send annoyed notes. When they meet in person, they fall in love, unawares of their living arrangements.

This remake of RAFTER ROMANCE takes the Cox-and-Box story and retreats int simplistic humor to keep it Code-compliant: lots of puns in the names (the apartment building is "The Venus De Milo Arms", two characters are "Ghonoff Brothers"), and 1930s-safe wolves like Franklin Pangborn as Miss Courtney's boss. But despite the plethora of comic talent, including om Kennedy, Chester Clute, and Jimmy Conlin, there's too much grouchiness in the script and performances to keep any but the most sadistic audience smiling. Consistently. The result is another decent timewaster from RKO during a rote era.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed