The Star Boarder (1914) Poster

(II) (1914)

User Reviews

Review this title
11 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Early Chaplin, starting to find his style
wmorrow599 July 2002
This is one of 35 Keystone comedies Charlie Chaplin appeared in during his first year in the movies, made just before he was granted creative control of his output. Unlike some of his earlier shorts The Star Boarder has the feel of a Chaplin film, so much so we get the impression he was already taking charge behind the scenes. The story is straightforward and easy to follow, slapstick violence is kept to a minimum, and, best of all, Charlie himself comes off as a basically likable figure. In some his other early movies he's a scoundrel, but here he's the fellow we recognize from the films he would soon create on his own.

As the title implies, Charlie is the favored lodger in his boarding house. He flirts with the landlady (Minta Durfee) who dotes on him, but their relationship seems to be chaste. The landlady's husband (Edgar Kennedy, wearing a silly mustache) is unhappy about the situation, but he has a little something going on the side, too. Their son happily snaps photos of the grown-ups in compromising situations, then reveals his work at a magic lantern show and embarrasses all parties, leading to mayhem -- rather restrained mayhem, actually, by Keystone standards. We're pleased to observe that the kid gets a good spanking, too.

Charlie is introduced in a nicely composed shot, smoking in bed and peering over the tops of his famous shoes. He isn't a bad sort here, especially compared to the obnoxious sadist he plays in some of the other Keystones. His worst transgression in The Star Boarder is a raid on the boarding house ice box, where he helps himself to some cold beer. He makes a mess and gets a little drunk, but otherwise no harm done. As for infidelity, we are given the impression that the landlady is merely fond of him, and that Charlie is being opportunistic and turning the situation to his advantage. Even when he began directing his own work Chaplin wasn't always interested in gaining audience sympathy (as when he torments his elderly assistant in The Property Man), but ultimately, of course, he came around to a warmer and more humane characterization.

The Star Boarder is a little slow to get started, but the magic lantern show finale is worth waiting for. Over all this is an enjoyable short, not terribly funny or memorable, but a fairly pleasant viewing experience, especially if you're put off by the wildly rowdy entries from Chaplin's Keystone series.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Typical Chaplin Keystone Goofiness
CitizenCaine14 June 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Chaplin gets involved with his landlady and her husband and a comedy of errors ensues and is revealed by the landlady's son before it's all over. This is another typical Keystone production filled with some sight gags, particularly on the tennis court, goofiness, exaggerated mannerisms, and out of place scenes which have nothing to do with anything. Chaplin's scene with the ice box is a case in point. We've seen his drunken bit a bit too much by now. As it is, these early Keystone films were largely experimental with performers feeling their way and ad-libbing through films, trying to find what's right for audiences and maybe discover something new. This film does nothing new for Chaplin. *1/2 of 4 stars.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Adultery in the Boarding House
nukisepp5 February 2021
An early situation comedy that's not overly funny or memorable. Charles Chaplin's The Tramp is the favorite lodger of the landlady (Minta Durfee) in the boarding house. Her husband (Edgar Kennedy) doesn't like them two spend too much good time together. But he has his own thing going on with a female lodger. Their son secretly takes compromising pictures of them while they are having their "dates". In the evening he shows the pictures to the whole house at the magic lantern show. And the usual group fight will go off. Everyone will get their fair share of hits and kicks.

'The Star Boarder' is somewhere in the middle ground with the quality in Chaplin's Keystone movies. The story is clear, but not very funny. You can even call it a dame compared to some other Keystone slapstick fights. I find this one of the least amusing early Chaplin's films.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Not too exciting
23skidoo-418 June 2004
Charlie Chaplin was still working out the kinks in his Little Tramp character with this rather tame comedy of errors. This one generated barely a chuckle from me, perhaps due to the lack of chemistry between Chaplin and his so-called leading lady in this film, playing a landlady whom everyone thinks Charlie is in love with.

Perhaps had Mabel Normand been given the role of the landlady, there might have been a bit more spark. Certainly Chaplin's later leading lady, Edna Purviance, would have been perfect in the role. But such as not to be.

There are a few funny moments, such as when Charlie bats a tennis ball out of sight (reflecting perhaps the real-life Chaplin's growing interest in the sport?), and a pointless though funny sequence in which Charlie raids a fridge and gets drunk.

The best and funniest sequence comes near the end when the landlady's son, who secretly photographed the comedies of errors between his mom, his dad, and Charlie, puts on a special "parents gone wild" slide show and the usual Keystone mayhem ensues. The boy, incidentally, is played by Gordon Griffith, who appeared in a number of Chaplin's Keystone comedies before making a name for himself as Tarzan's son.

The Star Boarder falls somewhere in the middle ground of Chaplin's Keystone comedies. There's enough humor to hold one's interest, but it can't be considered one of his better works.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
not total crap
planktonrules17 May 2006
This is a film from Chaplin's first year in films. During this VERY hectic year, he churned out film after film after film for Keystone Studios and the quality of the films are, in general, quite poor. That's because the character of "the Little Tramp" was far from perfected and the films really had no script--just the barest of story ideas. While some Chaplin lovers might think this is sacrilege, all these movies I have seen are pretty lousy. Yes, there are some cute slapstick moments but barely any plot--absolutely NOTHING like the Chaplin we all came to love in his full-length films of the 20s and 30s.

Compared to other Keystone Chaplin films I have watched, this one is slightly better because it has a little more plot. And, it is fun to see the jealous husband and Charlie fight in the end. But, that's really about all there is to the movie. Certainly this is NOT an artistic of interesting film.
4 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good, Realistic Situation Comedy
jayraskin118 December 2012
This is Chaplin's 10th film and the fourth and last one that George Nichols directed. Only Mack Sennett directed Chaplin in more movies.

This is also the fourth film where he appears drunk ("Mable's Strange Predicament," "Tango, Tangled," and "His Favorite Pasttime" are the other three). It is the third film that he has Minta Durfee as a love interest ("Making a Living," and Cruel, Cruel Love) and the third film he fights with an enraged Edgar Kennedy ("A Film Johnie" and "Cruel, Cruel Love"). Both Durfee and Kennedy are excellent in their roles.

This is the first film in which Chaplin holds a pie. What is interesting is that nobody gets hit by the pie. Instead Chaplin just sits on it. This indicates that pie throwing in March of 1914 had not yet become a standard device in silent film comedies.

The film does not go for big laughs, but it does have a steady stream of small ones. Especially good is Gordon Griffith as a boy with a big, hysterical laugh who snaps naughty pictures of Durfee and Kennedy with different partners.

The film sets up some nice characters in a rooming house, but it does not go any where. It it is pleasantly more restrained and gentler than most Keystone Films. There is, however, the obligatory raucous ending.

Chaplin had done ten films in about ten weeks at Keystone at this point in time. He would take a small break and the following month come back with the two-reeler "Mable At The Wheel."
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
The Star Border is one Charlie Chaplin short seriously lacking in laughs
tavm13 June 2011
Warning: Spoilers
This is the first Charlie Chaplin short that is severely lacking in laughs for me. In this one, he plays the title character who likes the landlady and she seems to like in return to the consternation of her husband who threatens Charlie when his wife's not looking. Meanwhile, he seems to have a lady himself he fancies. Then there's their son who has a camera...The only sequence I found even remotely amusing was the tennis scene where Charlie gets hit a couple of times. Otherwise, I found the whole thing tedious and boring and not even a drunk scene could liven things up nor another fight sequence. In summary, The Star Border was the first Chaplin short that was serious lacking in entertainment value for me. It's only worth a look if you're a Chaplin completetist.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Doesn't quite shine like a star
TheLittleSongbird24 May 2018
Am a big fan of Charlie Chaplin, have been for over a decade now. Many films and shorts of his are very good to masterpiece, and like many others consider him a comedy genius and one of film's most important and influential directors.

He did do better than 'The Star Boarder', still made very early on in his career where he was still finding his feet and not fully formed what he became famous for. Can understand why the Keystone period suffered from not being as best remembered or highly remembered than his later efforts, but they are mainly decent and important in their own right. 'The Star Boarder' is a long way from a career high, but has a lot of nice things about it and is to me one of the better efforts in the 1914 Keystone batch.

'The Star Boarder' is not as hilarious, charming or touching as his later work and some other shorts in the same period. The story is flimsy and the production values not as audacious. Occasionally, things feel a little scrappy and confused.

For someone who was still relatively new to the film industry and had literally just moved on from their stage background, 'The Star Boarder' is not bad at all.

While not audacious, the film hardly looks ugly, is more than competently directed and is appealingly played. Chaplin looks comfortable for so early on and shows his stage expertise while opening it up that it doesn't become stagy or repetitive shtick. Not one of his most likeable characters though.

Although the humour, charm and emotion was done even better and became more refined later, 'The Star Boarder' is humorous, sweet and easy to like, though the emotion is not quite there. It moves quickly and doesn't feel too long or short. The tennis ball and raiding the fridge scenes are the funniest parts.

Overall, far from one of Chaplin's best but pretty good and perhaps one of his better efforts from the early Keystone period. 7/10 Bethany Cox
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
One of the better plots...
Anonymous_Maxine26 February 2008
For about the first two thirds of The Landlady's Pet ( that's the real title, by the way - The Star Boarder was the former title, but ultimately it was changed) it seems that it is going to come across as three distinctly separate parts - the first third, where Charlie is the "star boarder," the landlady's favorite lodger to the chagrin of her jealous husband, the drunken scene, and the obnoxious son's disruptive magic lantern show.

But as soon as the lantern show begins it becomes clear that it is going to tie the rest of the film together, which is something that Chaplin wasn't doing much during that first year making Keystone short comedies for Mack Sennett. The drunken scene is sort of a straggler, it doesn't seem to have any reason for being there other than that Chaplin can do it so well (so well, in fact, that Robert Downey Jr. included it as part of his performance in the phenomenal 1992 film about Chaplin's life), the conclusion of the film and the tying up of loose ends is a welcome surprise.

Watch for Gordon Griffith, a mainstay in Chaplin's earliest films, stealing the show as the landlady and her husband's obnoxious son. It's easy to see why Chaplin kept casting him in his films!
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Early Chaplin
Michael_Elliott8 March 2008
Star Boarder, The (1914)

** (out of 4)

Lower Keystone short features Charles Chaplin playing the landlady's pet, which doesn't sit too well with the other tenants and it certainly doesn't go over well with the woman's jealous husband. While this film doesn't really work it at least features a couple funny sequences with Chaplin doing his magic. Even though we still don't see the Chaplin the world would end up loving, these early shorts at least show him growing as an artist. One of the better scenes in the film is when Chaplin is trying to learn how to play tennis. The facial expressions of anger are quite funny as is another scene where Chaplin notices the woman's husband is standing behind him yet he tries to play dumb as if he didn't see the husband. The rest of the film is pretty weak without too many laughs, although the ending is a pretty nice kicker.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
It is certainly rapid-fire
deickemeyer15 July 2018
This is one of Mack Sennett's farcical comedies which causes hearty laughter all through the action. It is certainly rapid-fire and has been well photographed. - The Moving Picture World, April 18, 1914
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed