Many places outside of the blue zones have achieved average life expectancy of 84 years. So I'm not sure what makes the blue zones so special. This programme is over dramatic in its claims. Why aren't any scientists or data analysts present to give a balanced view.
I also wondered how well records would have been kept in some of those remote areas. Could someone think they were 95 and maybe they were only 88?
Since these studies, further analysis has shown that the data mentioned isn't entirely accurate. The agenda should have been more balanced. Someone needed to debunk the data on the show or at least challenge it to show whether it holds up to scrutiny.
I also wondered how well records would have been kept in some of those remote areas. Could someone think they were 95 and maybe they were only 88?
Since these studies, further analysis has shown that the data mentioned isn't entirely accurate. The agenda should have been more balanced. Someone needed to debunk the data on the show or at least challenge it to show whether it holds up to scrutiny.