Um agricultor simples, conspira para assassinar a mulher em busca de lucro, convencendo seu filho adolescente a ajudá-lo. Mas suas ações têm conseqüências não intencionais.Um agricultor simples, conspira para assassinar a mulher em busca de lucro, convencendo seu filho adolescente a ajudá-lo. Mas suas ações têm conseqüências não intencionais.Um agricultor simples, conspira para assassinar a mulher em busca de lucro, convencendo seu filho adolescente a ajudá-lo. Mas suas ações têm conseqüências não intencionais.
- Prêmios
- 1 vitória e 4 indicações no total
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Elenco e equipe completos
- Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro
Avaliações em destaque
My thoughts:
1 - the movie was very similar to the novella which is a great thing.
2 - The actors portraying Wilf and Hank nailed the characters.
3 - No CGI that I could notice. The movie relied on subtlety and didn't try to explain everything detail.
4 - My wife enjoyed it, and she is a tough big to crack.
1 - the movie was very similar to the novella which is a great thing.
2 - The actors portraying Wilf and Hank nailed the characters.
3 - No CGI that I could notice. The movie relied on subtlety and didn't try to explain everything detail.
4 - My wife enjoyed it, and she is a tough big to crack.
The movie is beautifully shot and very evocative of the period and location.
The plot summary tells you up front what happens -- a man kills his wife after coercing his son into helping. Who knows why he couldn't have just done it himself. As expected with a Stephen King story, things go downhill afterwards.
My primary objection is the accent used by Thomas Jane in the lead role. Was it supposed to be ... some kind of Midwest Okie? Others have praised his acting so mine is a minority opinion, but I could never get past it.
The story is narrated by the father, which isn't a device I particularly enjoy in general, plus it makes his weird accent and slowly deliberate way of speaking even more prominent.
The plot summary tells you up front what happens -- a man kills his wife after coercing his son into helping. Who knows why he couldn't have just done it himself. As expected with a Stephen King story, things go downhill afterwards.
My primary objection is the accent used by Thomas Jane in the lead role. Was it supposed to be ... some kind of Midwest Okie? Others have praised his acting so mine is a minority opinion, but I could never get past it.
The story is narrated by the father, which isn't a device I particularly enjoy in general, plus it makes his weird accent and slowly deliberate way of speaking even more prominent.
Despite Stephen King being one of my favorite authors I have to admit I'd never even heard of 1922 let alone read it.
I tend to enjoy Stephen King adaptations, they're not all flawless but many have been outstanding and therefore I do tend to seek them out.
1922 is one of two Stephen King Adaptations released by Netflix in the same year beside the disapointing Geralds Game. It stars Thomas Jane & Neal McDonough set in *Drumroll* 1922. It tells the story of a farmer who with the aid of his 14yr old son decides to kill off his wife to maintain the life he is acustomed to and for financial security.
The movie is dark, gritty and sombre as you would imagine and Jane may well be at a career best here.
If you're expecting horror you will find very little, that simply isn't what 1922 is. If it had to be compared to anything I'd say Edgar Alan Poe's a Telltale Heart would be a good fit.
It doesn't make for the easiest viewing and has elements from Of Mice & Men (That she tell you all you need to know) but regardless it is a powerful piece that managed to entertain even despite my initial concerns.
The Good:
Thomas Jane is excellent
Great narration
Looks fantastic
The Bad:
Not for animal lovers
Difficult viewing
Questionable pacing
Things I Learnt From This Movie:
Not that I thought about it at all but he made some weird choices in covering up the murder *Ahem* not that I in anyway put deep thought into getting away with murder
I tend to enjoy Stephen King adaptations, they're not all flawless but many have been outstanding and therefore I do tend to seek them out.
1922 is one of two Stephen King Adaptations released by Netflix in the same year beside the disapointing Geralds Game. It stars Thomas Jane & Neal McDonough set in *Drumroll* 1922. It tells the story of a farmer who with the aid of his 14yr old son decides to kill off his wife to maintain the life he is acustomed to and for financial security.
The movie is dark, gritty and sombre as you would imagine and Jane may well be at a career best here.
If you're expecting horror you will find very little, that simply isn't what 1922 is. If it had to be compared to anything I'd say Edgar Alan Poe's a Telltale Heart would be a good fit.
It doesn't make for the easiest viewing and has elements from Of Mice & Men (That she tell you all you need to know) but regardless it is a powerful piece that managed to entertain even despite my initial concerns.
The Good:
Thomas Jane is excellent
Great narration
Looks fantastic
The Bad:
Not for animal lovers
Difficult viewing
Questionable pacing
Things I Learnt From This Movie:
Not that I thought about it at all but he made some weird choices in covering up the murder *Ahem* not that I in anyway put deep thought into getting away with murder
Based on Stephen King's novella of the same name, 1922 is like Stephen King's own version of Allen Poe's timeless classic THE TELL-TALE HEART story that set around here Wilfred James, a Nebraska farmer with a bitter wife named Arlette and a loyal son named Henry. This hardworking but not-too-successful farmer finds himself under increasing pressure from his wife when she clearly started to express her frustrations living in the country and wants to sell her all of the 100 acres of land that she got inheritably and move to the big city. Through their disagreements, when Arlette threatens to divorce him, taking the son with her, Wilfred plots to murder her and methodically persuades his son to become his partner in crime. This is beautifully done, an effectively slow-burn horror-drama directed by Zak Hilditch and like the way Carla Gugino turned GERALD'S GAME into her own showcase of versatile acting talent, this time almost an unrecognizable Thomas Jane delivered one of his best performances in career, IMO. His deeply sincere & committed performance as an early 1920s manipulative, desperate farmer with a slowly rotten psyche
was not only an absolute treat but surely this year's one the best so far that deserve some recognition in the coming award season.
Stephen King is considered as one of the best novelists in the horror genre & not without reason. Post the stupendous success of IT, Netflix has delivered another movie based on a Stephen King novella of the same name. The movie stars Thomas Jane & Molly Parker of House of Cards fame who plays Arlette James. The movie set in 1922's rural America is about a family of 3 - Wilfred James(Thomas Jane), his wife Arlette & son Henry. The movie is narrated by Wilfred - a farmer who owns 80 acres of land. His wife Arlette has been bequeathed 100 acres of land by her father. While the wife wants to sell all the land & move to the city, her husband & madly in love teenager son have other plans. Wilfred manages to poison his son's mind & conspires with him to brutally murder his own wife. What happens next forms the crux of the story. The movie starts off a bit slowly but picks up pace soon. The movie gets scarier as story proceeds further. The plot is well scripted & will keep you entertained. The characters are well etched & the screenplay is commendable. It does give you a feel of how America was in the 1920's, when it was yet to become the economic & military superpower that it is today. It does provide you a glimpse of rural America & highlights certain aspects of American rural life, hitherto unseen in any other movie. Special mention needs to be given to Thomas Jane for his performance. The movie does fall short in the spooks department. While it does have its share of scary moments, you are likely to be disappointed with the thrills. But if you are a sucker for horror movies, this one is worth watch.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesStephen King himself has expressed his satisfaction with the adaptation of "1922," stating that he was "delighted by the film." His endorsement further adds to the appeal of the movie for fans of his work.
- Erros de gravaçãoThe various currencies found around the house are small $20 Bills,they where only made after 1929. All the currency should have been large size notes (not in terms of denominations but physical size).
- Citações
Wilfred James: I discovered something that night that most people never have to learn. Murder is sin. Murder is damnation. But murder is also work.
- Cenas durante ou pós-créditosVintage end credits.
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is 1922?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Tempo de duração1 hora 42 minutos
- Cor
- Mixagem de som
- Proporção
- 2.35 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente