Siamo verso la fine della seconda guerra mondiale, 500 soldati americani sono prigionieri da 3 anni. Le loro speranze di essere salvati sono ormai ridotte all'osso, ma un gruppo di Ranger in... Leggi tuttoSiamo verso la fine della seconda guerra mondiale, 500 soldati americani sono prigionieri da 3 anni. Le loro speranze di essere salvati sono ormai ridotte all'osso, ma un gruppo di Ranger intraprende una pericolosa missione per salvarli.Siamo verso la fine della seconda guerra mondiale, 500 soldati americani sono prigionieri da 3 anni. Le loro speranze di essere salvati sono ormai ridotte all'osso, ma un gruppo di Ranger intraprende una pericolosa missione per salvarli.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 1 candidatura in totale
Recensioni in evidenza
As far as I can recall there haven't been very many movies depicting conditions in Japanese POW camps. "Bridge On The River Kwai" springs to mind, but this is the only other one I think I've come across. It's always hard to judge the accuracy of how the enemy is portrayed in a movie like this. In this case, though, we do know that the Japanese were in fact brutal captors. Surrender was the ultimate dishonour, and prisoners, therefore, were seen as deserving of neither honour nor respect. The conditions portrayed in the camp, therefore, were believable and probably historically accurate.
The portrayal of camp conditions is one of the highlights of the movie. The other is the actual raid carried out. It was portrayed in great detail and, again, in a very believable way. The basic problem with this movie, though, is that it repeatedly seems to get bogged down. Frankly, when the movie strays from those two subjects it just isn't that interesting, and all the various sidebars end up making this longer than it needed to be. The character of Margaret Utinski (played by Connie Nielsen) was especially problematic. Utinski was a real person - and a winner of the Medal of Honour - but there are historical questions about her life, and there was certainly no romance involved in her actions, as is suggested throughout the movie.
Aside from Nielsen, the cast were fine, but in all honesty no one stood out to me as outstanding. As I've suggested, there are certainly aspects of this movie that make it worthwhile viewing, but it certainly can't be mistaken for a masterpiece. (6/10)
The script is good, the acting and editing superb, and the photography is very good. The film is violent, but does not wallow in flying guts and body parts as has been the recent fashion. Nothing flashy, nothing overwhelming, just solid craftsmanship. This is a film which is less concerned with making an impression than it is with telling a story, and I found that very refreshing. In my opinion, the film succeeds completely in telling its simple story and will likely be recognized for years to come as one of the better war films of recent times. All of the acting in this film is excellent, but watch for the standout performances from Marton Csokas, Joseph Fiennes, James Franco and Connie Nielsen.
I'd recommend this movie to anyone. Major criticisms seem to be that there's no deep complex characters and no protagonist. I think that is a positive for this movie because the POWs are the main characters themselves. The men and women just did what needed to be done for their countrymen and their country. There was deep motivation because someone had been scarred when they were 15 and thus acts this way. Most of the characters are real life people and you can't focus on one or two characters like in a fictional story that someone wrote.
It's too bad this movie won't do well at the office because it doesn't cater to the teens and their expendable income. The limited wide release also won't help it but I know for those who watch it they'll be touched. They'll know that there were and are sacrifices being made to ensure that the country they live in are safe and protected.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizRichard Joson plays his own grandfather.
- BlooperIn the film the plane that flies over the camp to distract the guards is a Lockheed Hudson. In reality the plane used was a P-61 Black Widow. However, there are only five P-61s still in existence, none of which are airworthy. Therefore the filmmakers were forced to make the substitution.
- Citazioni
General Kreuger: Henry, I'll be honest with you. This mission appeals more to my heart than to my head.
- Curiosità sui creditiThe first part of the end credits are superimposed over actual footage of the American prisoners following their liberation.
- ConnessioniReferenced in Hannity & Colmes: Episodio datato 12 agosto 2005 (2005)
- Colonne sonoreYou Go To My Head
Written by Haven Gillespie and J. Fred Coots
Performed by Victoria Hamilton
Published by Toy Town Tunes, Inc. (ASCAP) and Gillespie Haven Music (ASCAP)
Produced by Sourcerer
I più visti
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paesi di origine
- Siti ufficiali
- Lingue
- Celebre anche come
- Un pugno di eroi
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 80.000.000 USD (previsto)
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 10.167.373 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 3.376.009 USD
- 14 ago 2005
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 10.777.375 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione2 ore 12 minuti
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
