aferdman

Yes, this movie is awful as it normal for D'Amato and its my favored across collection of some 2000 awful flicks. Its awful because I couldn't find decent copy, colors off etc. So what makes it my favored? Main chick! She is slut, cheesy, undress often and, in short, this is the way single men like any women. Reality in USA quite strange for any local as women became species not necessarily females. This movie is a dream, imagination and a story and D'Amato makes conflict after conflict to keep it running. It also realistically shows how we, men, chase anything with name female on it. Yes, sex part kinda not here--too bad. The flick not shy touch social aspect namely money which is name of the game in US.

D'Amato mentality is sure different from mainstream crowd movie-goers but is it good or bad, is it art or porno, is it possible to define? Its all depend on who you ask, right? So why I watch this B-movie from past but not something mainstream? Yes, why? Why I don't mention anything like "Citizen Kane" which supposedly timeless jewel? Simple. Because D'Amato reflect on my life and my experience, yes, somehow I feel connected. Any movie is a propaganda and propaganda have to be convincing, real and imaginative. Do I actually care what's movie about? No, I am expecting to be engaged by plot, music, actors, location, talking etc. Once upon the time I watch supposedly great movie about Vietnam with great Chuck Norris and how he is great and Vietnamese bad, then I ask myself--who invaded who--Vietnam invaded USA or USA invaded Vietnam? As the answer was self-obvious so great Chuck Norris suddenly not so great anymore. And so it goes.