Der Detektiv Clayton Douglas wird in ein abgelegenes Krankenhaus gerufen, wo er Zeuge des ungeheuerlichen Sterbebett-Geständnisses eines mysteriösen Bürgerkriegsveteranen wird, das ihn dazu ... Alles lesenDer Detektiv Clayton Douglas wird in ein abgelegenes Krankenhaus gerufen, wo er Zeuge des ungeheuerlichen Sterbebett-Geständnisses eines mysteriösen Bürgerkriegsveteranen wird, das ihn dazu zwingt, das Übernatürliche zu akzeptieren.Der Detektiv Clayton Douglas wird in ein abgelegenes Krankenhaus gerufen, wo er Zeuge des ungeheuerlichen Sterbebett-Geständnisses eines mysteriösen Bürgerkriegsveteranen wird, das ihn dazu zwingt, das Übernatürliche zu akzeptieren.
- Auszeichnungen
- 23 Gewinne & 2 Nominierungen insgesamt
Empfohlene Bewertungen
If you are looking for people shooting 1000 yards past the effective range of a weapon from a car flying off the cliff and doing a ninja roll to escape all injury. Then this isn't the movie for you.
Just a good haunting story, that reveals itself slowly but tantalizingly. If you like actual storytelling this is your kind of movie.
The acting, directing and production is solid. It's the story itself that's compelling about this movie. Telling you much more would give away part of the story. It does roll on at it's own slow pace and deliberately pulls you back at times. There could have also been a little more clarification on a few things. That'd be my only real complaint.
Just a good haunting story, that reveals itself slowly but tantalizingly. If you like actual storytelling this is your kind of movie.
The acting, directing and production is solid. It's the story itself that's compelling about this movie. Telling you much more would give away part of the story. It does roll on at it's own slow pace and deliberately pulls you back at times. There could have also been a little more clarification on a few things. That'd be my only real complaint.
The idea was not new, but was decent. Some of the acting was good, most was painful. RIP Tom Sizemore, but darn, he did a terrible job. The story line was so convoluted because it didn't know whether it wanted to be a horror movie, a folk tale, or a drama. This desperately needed a better director to help it choose its genre, and it needed a better editor to cut it way down. I actually fast forwarded through many scenes just so I could get through it. It gets 4 stars because I was actually interested enough to see it through to the end, albeit by skipping a few scenes here and there. If you have nothing else to do one night, you could watch it, but be prepared to be patient and fast forward here and there!
First off, I've liked Tom Sizemore, RIP, in some of his past movies. It seems like toward the end of his life, he was pumping out a lot bad scripted movies. I thought he looked terribly sick right away and his voice was badly broken. It is overly long and I too had to FF through a lot of the historical flashback. The movie to me had the sense of a play more than a movie. Special effects were below average. The ending itched of some sort of sequel, and was another one of those, you guess what it means endings. Seemed really low budget in general. Small cast, small sets. And misdirected. There are better things to watch.
I actually made an account *specifically* for reviewing this movie as i believe the ratings are a bit unfair, the reviews are worse. Some of them make valid points, but i think others are needlessly over-critical. The one about watching it on 1.5x speed... come on, do you even like watching movies at that point?
This director hasnt made many movies. Its obviously a bit lower budget. HOWEVER, as someone who's watched hundreds of horror movies, i honestly enjoyed this. Its not perfect, but its creepy and entertaining and keeps you intrigued
i do agree with other reviewers that the plot was a bit convoluted and couldve been condensed down. In parts (the beginning, especially) the acting isnt really very good. That being said - there are many movies that have convoluted plotlines and/or bad acting that are well loved and highly rated.
TLDR; its entertaining enough, its a fun watch, a little creepy and i enjoyed it. Dont go into it expecting too much, like hollywood-tier production and john carpenter-esque screenwriting. Its decent for what it is.
This director hasnt made many movies. Its obviously a bit lower budget. HOWEVER, as someone who's watched hundreds of horror movies, i honestly enjoyed this. Its not perfect, but its creepy and entertaining and keeps you intrigued
i do agree with other reviewers that the plot was a bit convoluted and couldve been condensed down. In parts (the beginning, especially) the acting isnt really very good. That being said - there are many movies that have convoluted plotlines and/or bad acting that are well loved and highly rated.
TLDR; its entertaining enough, its a fun watch, a little creepy and i enjoyed it. Dont go into it expecting too much, like hollywood-tier production and john carpenter-esque screenwriting. Its decent for what it is.
10knurlyn
I just read each of the reviews of this offering and am disappointed but not surprised be the viewing public. These people should never watch or read "Death of a Salesman." They would mistake it for an unfinished cartoon.
This show had its faults, but they could have been corrected. It was too long, but a skillful editor could reduce it to the attention span of most viewers. The connection to "the Spinoza" killings/case wasn't explicit enough early-on.
It was hard to see Tom Sizemore in physical decline. But, his performance was a study in quality. This was meant to be a credit to the seamy, dark detective stories of the thirties. (Don't even get me started on his car - incredible!) And it came through for me with flying colors.
The GREAT easily made up for the not-so-good. If there is justice in Hollywood, this script will be redone in the not distant future with a gifted edit that doesn't gut delicate weave of the timeless tale, and with another actor worthy of the lead role. Michael Masson or Tom Hardy could do it justice.
This show had its faults, but they could have been corrected. It was too long, but a skillful editor could reduce it to the attention span of most viewers. The connection to "the Spinoza" killings/case wasn't explicit enough early-on.
It was hard to see Tom Sizemore in physical decline. But, his performance was a study in quality. This was meant to be a credit to the seamy, dark detective stories of the thirties. (Don't even get me started on his car - incredible!) And it came through for me with flying colors.
The GREAT easily made up for the not-so-good. If there is justice in Hollywood, this script will be redone in the not distant future with a gifted edit that doesn't gut delicate weave of the timeless tale, and with another actor worthy of the lead role. Michael Masson or Tom Hardy could do it justice.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesThe fund raising teaser trailer for IMPURATUS has won close to 40 awards from around the world.
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Impuratus?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Offizielle Standorte
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- Impuratus 1863
- Drehorte
- Furlong, Pennsylvania, USA(Exterior Proctor Residence)
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
- Laufzeit2 Stunden 14 Minuten
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.78 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
