Even as a true crime junkie,. I couldn't watch more than 15 minutes of this tripe. It is NOT a re-examining of the Melendez case-- it's a bunch of millennial internet trolls with zero life experience trying to re-imagine the facts of the case, absent any facts to support them.
From what I saw, no new evidence was presented. The brothers claim they're not responsible because they were abused. True? Maybe, but there's no evidence to support that, hence the guilty verdict at the time. An affirmative defense requires evidence, which simply isn't there.
If this presentation only revisited the case it would have been so-so, but that wasn't the focus. Instead, a few tik-tok "experts" (who apparently never left their mother's basement) were used to propel this sorry mess forward. These people thought they "deserved" to be heard... in spite of offering NOTHING new.
Even if you've never heard of this case, this is an absolutely awful introduction. There are more opinions than fact here, so don't waste your time. How this ever got made is a bigger mystery than the Melendez case.
From what I saw, no new evidence was presented. The brothers claim they're not responsible because they were abused. True? Maybe, but there's no evidence to support that, hence the guilty verdict at the time. An affirmative defense requires evidence, which simply isn't there.
If this presentation only revisited the case it would have been so-so, but that wasn't the focus. Instead, a few tik-tok "experts" (who apparently never left their mother's basement) were used to propel this sorry mess forward. These people thought they "deserved" to be heard... in spite of offering NOTHING new.
Even if you've never heard of this case, this is an absolutely awful introduction. There are more opinions than fact here, so don't waste your time. How this ever got made is a bigger mystery than the Melendez case.