Two women jokingly agree to kill each others' husbands. Then one really does and blackmails the other into killing her own.Two women jokingly agree to kill each others' husbands. Then one really does and blackmails the other into killing her own.Two women jokingly agree to kill each others' husbands. Then one really does and blackmails the other into killing her own.
Samantha Fox
- Female voice
- (voice)
Suzanne Serwatuk
- Hotel Clerk
- (voice)
Tyrel Hansen
- Office Worker
- (uncredited)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaThe synopsis for the film was written before filming began, hence the mix-up with the character names at other sites.
- Crazy creditsAt the end of the credits, they list "Sammi the cat" "Woodley's Wildlife Steve & Darcy Woodley" Sammi the cat was played by two cats.
- ConnectionsReferences Strangers on a Train (1951)
Featured review
Two women complain about their husbands, leading to a murder and blackmail
This movie was so bad it was laughable. I couldn't resist watching it though. The plot is standard, the acting quite horrible (supporting cast such as the nutty neighbor and the lawyer friend were better actors). Kind of amusing if you have some time to waste and like seeing the conclusion to a dramatic plot.
The headliner who plays "Kathy" was just fascinating because I couldn't decide if her deadpan, flat affect was the result of bad surgery or simply bad acting (I decided it was both). This leaves the script to comment on, which was pretty awful. Pat remarks, idiotic decisions, and reckless stupidity on the part of every character in the movie. Maybe this is what was so riveting; I don't know. I just watched it to see how bad it could be. (Actually the dialog doesn't even qualify to be called "cliche'" - but it's almost completely inane.)
All in all, very bad, cheaply made movie. The sets, the same scenes (a house, a building) were shown over and over with no artistry or actual tie-in to the action; more like props that were randomly dropped into the action in a bad play. A chase scene could have been shot by any juvenile in a warehouse or an old school: poorly shot, cheap props, minimal action.... and I still wanted to see the ending. Go figure.
The headliner who plays "Kathy" was just fascinating because I couldn't decide if her deadpan, flat affect was the result of bad surgery or simply bad acting (I decided it was both). This leaves the script to comment on, which was pretty awful. Pat remarks, idiotic decisions, and reckless stupidity on the part of every character in the movie. Maybe this is what was so riveting; I don't know. I just watched it to see how bad it could be. (Actually the dialog doesn't even qualify to be called "cliche'" - but it's almost completely inane.)
All in all, very bad, cheaply made movie. The sets, the same scenes (a house, a building) were shown over and over with no artistry or actual tie-in to the action; more like props that were randomly dropped into the action in a bad play. A chase scene could have been shot by any juvenile in a warehouse or an old school: poorly shot, cheap props, minimal action.... and I still wanted to see the ending. Go figure.
helpful•83
- mlark4
- Oct 12, 2007
Details
Box office
- Budget
- CA$1,300,000 (estimated)
- Runtime1 hour 28 minutes
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.78 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content