Reviews

7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Vampires (1998)
2/10
Not worth your time
22 April 2023
Felt generous by giving it a two. The only thing this movie and the book it was based on was Vampires. The book deserved a better movie. The book was a good book very entertaining this movie was not the movie kept three characters from the book and it didn't do much with building the characters on what they did and why they did it there was no backstory on the group it just sucked in the end just glad it was over. The movie could have been better if they were doing something then just sitting around and waiting and waiting. They could have kept a few more of the main characters in the movie besides three people and then a group of vampires to come get them.
0 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Carrie (1976)
7/10
Age of the actors
16 March 2023
It's a decent movie the problem with this movie along with movies at that time the get actors that are in their mid-twenties or early thirties to play teenagers and most look older than the teachers and administrators. It's just not realistic in that way Sissy was 26 playing Carrie who was in the book 9-10 years younger and you could see this woman trying to play a kid. Same with most of the cast unfortunately that's what they do in Hollywood. If you want adults to play kids narrow the age gap so it's not so obvious to the paying audience. The movie follows closely to the book which is not the case with most movies that adapt a book to play as a movie.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Big Bang Theory (2007–2019)
6/10
They needed to do their home work
21 October 2022
I don't know how many people know that Albert Einstein was a idiot savant. He was brilliant in Physics but other than that nothing. The man flunked out of school he needed people to do every day things for him had an assistant to read to him and write letters to others on his behalf since he couldn't spell. Had people to make sure that he wasn't taken advantage of. The show needed to be more informative on certain people in history no matter how recent or ancient. But the actors should have studied up on some of it too. I know it's not their responsibility but to be more realistic as well as entertaining.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Robin Hood (1973)
9/10
A very good children's movie
7 October 2021
It was never made to entertain adults it's to entertain kids in all of us. Or don't you remember seeing it as a kid either in the movies or on tape now it would be dvd, blu-ray, and streaming. When life was easier you had no worries in the world but what you would do next. People need to stop judging stuff from yesteryear with today's standards it's unfair to do to movie in which you would go watch for about 90 minutes and enjoy yourself. Was there some unaccuracies in this movie probably but name one movie ever that Showed what like was really like back then. So yes for who the movie was made for it's a good movie.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A good movie that most enjoyed
2 September 2021
Needed a bit more realistic for the time period. For example most of the nobility spoke French not English since King Richard only spent about six months of his reign in England he was French and lived in Normandy. I doubt that most people today know that it was considered not becoming to not speak French at that time the peasants spoke English.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Don't waste your time
7 August 2021
If I could give it less then one I would have. Trying to be kind can't really see any reason to waste your time trying to watch it. I guess if you really don't have anything to do you might give it a go but be hard pressed to be able to watch it. I don't see how people could give it a 7,8,9,or 10 out of 10 I must be missing something. The first one was not great but it was better than this one. I have tried to watch it but but the first ten minutes of the movie is hard to watch. I can't get thru it of course this movie was written and targeted towards kids not for young adults and adults who can think.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Deep Impact (1998)
1/10
Waste of your time to watch
20 August 2020
A big disappointment none of the actors did anything in the movie to make you care what happened to them. If you have not watched it don't and if you have unfortunately you will never get your time back. If I could have given a negative star I would have given a one star is more than fair for this movie. The way it was done it seemed that the actors and actresses where more concerned about the next movie they would be in the same with the director and producers as well they were not involved with what they were doing just going thru the motions in this one. Armageddon was the better of these two disaster movies yes it had its problems but at least you were Wanted them to destroy the asteroid. In deep impact you where cheering for the comet to take everyone out. There was no redeeming quality to anyone in the movie it was all about me. What can I get out of this. For the.
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed