Reviews

13 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
My New Favorite "Bad" Old Movie
8 May 2024
Warning: Spoilers
One of those films I'm in a phase of watching over and over... I have very good taste in films, so I'm surprised at how appealing I find "Behind That Curtain." Now it happens that I like Gilbert Emery--that's how I found the film--and I don't mind at all that he speaks soooo slowly. Presumably it was the director who dictated the drawn-out sentences and melodrama. But I'm swayed by the charm and beauty of Lois Moran and Warner Baxter... and somehow I really enjoy the love scene in the tent... except for Moran's "...it..... must..... be...... goodbye tomorrow" and "it.... must.... be.... only.... a memory...". They do have some good acting moments, like when they have tea in India.

The things that bother me are story details, such as Charlie Chan saying he's got all the doors covered at the theater and somehow missing Durand getting in, or how Pornick is so stupid as to sign his letter to Eve, or how Durand is so short-sighted as to not realize he Chinese slippers would point straight to him. And when Sir Frederick is questioning Pornick, I keep wishing he would get angry and say, "Are you sure you were there at all? There obviously was a shot, because Galt is dead, but you didn't hear it? So where were you?"

Also, the camerawork is, in some moments, very beautiful. After Sir Frederick says, "Remember, I represent Scotland Yard," there's a set-up that's like a gorgeous still photo with the two constables framing the doorway. Then there are the shots of the caravan in the desert, predating "Lawrence of Arabia" by 30+ years. I think the editor messed up a bit on some of those desert scenes, though, cutting them short where they were just getting gorgeous.

It's not a "dreadful" film by a long shot, and obviously enough people have been interested in it to write all these reviews! They're all good actors... maybe Lois isn't the best, but I like her in this. We don't often get a chance to see actors go overboard, but it seemed appropriate for her in this role. She's radiant.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Chances (1931)
8/10
My New Favorite Old Movie
24 March 2024
Still watching this one after weeks of loving it... To start off I'll say I could have done without the drunken flower-seller in the Golden Lion and the seemingly meaningless 20 seconds of the German front. I can't judge the battle scenes because I find it so painful to watch horses in that situation in any film.

What I love are the romantic scenes with Doug Fairbanks Jr and Rose Hobart. She gets very little praise in the other reviews here, but I find her low-key presence and unglamorous facade quite appealing and so different from the overly made-up women in so many films.

Doug has so much star quality and glamor that I wonder his publicists didn't make more of him and help him get more money for his roles. But he seems to have gone out of his way to make sure they didn't associate him with his fabulously famous and talented father, so they must have erred in the other direction, not giving enough credit for his fabulous good looks and talent.

For those who love the gentility of kind family relationships and an old-fashioned style of romance, this is the film for them.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Spirited (2022)
3/10
Yuck
18 December 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Well, I'm spoiled, because I am a fan of decades of fabulous movies and know a good film and a good movie star when I see one, and this man Will Ferrell has no business starring in a film. He's positively painful to look at. Going to see this movie, which I walked out on, makes me realize what a waste of time and creative energy and money, of course, is being spent on so many of the films these days. It's a shame they should take such a classic as "A Christmas Carol" and find it necessary to transform it to such an extent that one can barely sit through the first half-hour. God knows they had enough original, classic and moving material to work with.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Poirot: The Mysterious Affair at Styles (1990)
Season 3, Episode 1
7/10
Not a review
25 November 2021
A comment... we see Hastings in the convalescent home with a group of other soldiers watching a film of battle. Is it possible, would they really have been so insensitive and cruel to show to soldiers who are supposed to be recovering from battle films of the very battles they just left?
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not As Bad As I Expected!
2 April 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I know the book by Dorothy L. Sayers backwards and forwards, and I love it. So knowing the film wasn't going to be true to the story and agreeing in advance that Robert Montgomery couldn't play Sayers' lightly handled Lord Peter Wimsey, I expected to be very disappointed. Imagine my delight when I found that not only didn't I mind that the story was so completely ignored but I actually liked the film. There's some good acting, and it holds together. Large and small defects: We have to listen to a ghastly hymn sung not once but twice. There is a compelte lack of humor in Doris Ruddle's character (she was one of the highlights of the book). Why is Harriet wearing a hat whilst reviewing wedding presents? A less pathetic actress could have been chosen for the pathetic role of Aggie Twitterton, and the Wimseys could have been less condescending to her; that was a large defect, because, as drawn by Sayers, Peter and Harriet are sympathetic, polite characters who would not be rude to people in less fortunate circumstances than themselves. There is a lot of humor, however, in general; my favorite line: "Let me take your stoat."
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Worst Cast Movie Ever
13 March 2020
Warning: Spoilers
All I have to say is in my title: The two male leads had no business being in this film... utterly inappropriate.
2 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Camille (1936)
9/10
A True Attraction
16 February 2020
All the reviewers say this is Garbo's best performance, but no one mentions that the attraction she obviously felt toward Robert Taylor made it happen. When she gives him her key and he leaves her in her boudoir during the dinner party, she kisses him all over his face; that's not written in the script.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Downton Abbey (2019)
5/10
So So
1 December 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Sorry, but this was forgettable, literally. When we drove away there was no resonance. The main thing left in my mind was how stupid Daisy was to think her boyfriend's sabotage was a proof of a strong character, evidence that he believed in something, i.e. his love for her; any reasonable person would stay far away from a guy like that. They didn't do well with the characterizations of the King and Queen, which anyone who read even the littlest bit of history would have noticed. Of course it's all very pretty, but honestly I scarcely remember anything else about it.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Lovely
22 April 2019
Too bad the first review I saw on the main page was negative. I think this film is lovely! It was a pleasure to see Basil Rathbone in a softer, less forthright role than what he usually played. Very enjoyable all around; all the acting very good; believable story. Always like seeing the old world as it might have been.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Road House (1934)
9/10
My New Favorite Old Movie... By A Long Way!
12 April 2019
I love this film! Gordon Harker and Violet Loraine are top-notch, and all the other leads are great. I love the singing and the story and the look back at a time long gone. The editing is terrific, so the pace is lively. Absolutely wonderful.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Great fun, Howard sublime
4 March 2019
I love this movie (except for the title), which I found on YouTube when searching for George Grossmith. I have one slight quibble with the action: Peggy would have noticed Sylvia as Sylvia walked from the bar where she had been waiting for Max. But who cares? Perfectly cast, light as a feather, totally delightful and smoothly acted. Howard at his subtle best.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Sweet, sexy, moving, funny, cute
10 November 2018
I'm contributing this mainly to comment on what most of the other reviews say that I disagree with: Ralph Graves was perfect in this role. Yes, he's wooden, but that's what works so perfectly with Barbara Stanwyck. Where it really matters is in their romantic scenes: first on his balcony, then at breakfast and particularly after his father leaves and they really get together for the first time. I'm not saying he's a good actor in general, but they had great chemistry in this film, and that's worth a lot. He's a realistic type of man, very focused and businesslike; some people think an artist couldn't be like that, but that's not true. It's frustrating to see everyone remarking on the clever performances of Marie Prevost and Lowell Sherman and denigrating Graves. The picture hangs together very well precisely because all the roles are ideally cast. Doubtless Stanwyck and Capra supply the magic. It's a film that's new to me, and I keep going back to it.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Poirot: Four and Twenty Blackbirds (1989)
Season 1, Episode 4
5/10
Absurd Premise
28 January 2017
Warning: Spoilers
As much as I enjoy all the Poirot episodes, I have to make a negative comment on this one. It is impossible that waitresses who served the artist on a regular basis could mistake the costumed nephew for his uncle. Standing two feet from someone they'd seen week in and week out, surely they would notice a wig, false facial hair and the fact that this man was decades younger than the one he impersonated. They'd already said he ordered completed different food and came in on a different day; it's highly unlikely they would ever have mistaken this pathetic caricature for the real man. It's so far-fetched as to be ridiculous, and I doubt if anyone, whether they knew the old man or not, would look at the counterfeit and not see through it.
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed