Reviews

15 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
The Teenage Psychic (2017–2019)
8/10
Charming, supernatural coming-of-age story set in Taiwan
4 September 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Taiwan is the last bastion of Chinese folk religion as practiced for thousands of years. The island is full of temples dedicated to various deities, but the Chinese being a practical people, many temples also acknowledge the Buddha and Taoist practices.

When I was living there in the early 1980s, I was told the religion was dying fast. But nothing could be farther from the truth. Not only did I meet quite a few young college students practicing Buddhist meditation, but the Taoist temples were constantly full of people paying respects to their ancestors and burning incense for good fortune. Every shop and restaurant has a little shrine (and you will see them in many Chinese restaurants around the U. S., too.

As for The Teenage Psychic, it does venture into supernatural territory that is not necessarily part of everyone's belief system, but I will say, I met spiritual teachers ("laoshi" was how they addressed Kim in the show, meaning "teacher") who had remarkable perception and, in a few cases, they inexplicably knew things about me and my friends that rationally speaking they should have no way of knowing.

I've watched this first season several times, to practice Mandarin (though, they shift often between Mandarin and Taiwanese, which is an older dialect descended from Fujian dialect spoken by settlers from the mainland).

The protagonist, Xie Yazhen, or Xiao Zhen as everyone calls here (it means little Zhen, a term of familiarity in Chinese), is sympathetic and complicated. She's trying to juggle her life as a fantastically gifted temple medium who can see and speak with the dead, and her other life as a 16-year-old high school junior.

Her relationship with Teacher Kim is also complicated; she lost her father when very young, and her mother lives abroad to earn money. Thus he is a father figure, and the two bumbling acolytes are like her older brothers. They interact with charm and humor, sometimes in frustration, much like a real family.

Where Xiao Zhen really shines is when she is channeling the dead to comfort a mourner seeking solace. This is a pretty heavy responsibility for a young girl (she's been doing this for years); it's hard to imagine doing that while simultaneously dealing with hormones and boyfriends.

There are a few convenient plot devices to move the story along, such as the tragic death of a major character in a traffic accident, which I consider a cheap trick. I found Xiao Zhen's girlfriend's shrill voice and constant preaching annoying. The school seemed pretty realistic; I've visited high schools in Taiwan and they are a bit run down, but the students are generally quite obedient and respectful toward authority, as depicted here.

I've only watched the first couple of episodes of S2, and have little desire to continue. They should have stopped with 1 because 2 is literally a repeat, even bringing back the ghost of the dead boy as a cheap trick, and other characters dead or moved away (because the actors were unavailable). Lacking in the imagination and charm of the first season. You can watch just the first season for a complete experience.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Downsizing (2017)
1/10
Politically correct, unscientific, pointless drivel
22 March 2020
Warning: Spoilers
First the good points. Done. Now let's get on to everything that's wrong with this movie. And that would be... everything.

Take the premise (please!). A Norwegian (of course) scientist develops a way to shrink living humans to 5 inches tall, with the goal of saving the environment. If all 7 billion of us shrank, we would use a tiny fraction of the resources and cause a lot less pollution. A company then commercialized the technology, advertising a sumptuous lifestyle in palatial mansions for people of modest means.

A surprising number of suckers buy into this, and permanently downsize themselves to live in this Disneyland-like town of mini people.

But Damon's wife backs out at the last minute, after he's already shrunk to the size of a mouse. This pretty much ends their marriage. It's not like they can have a normal relationship ever again, anyway.

So Damon just soldiers on, finding his way in this new downsized world which turns out to be pretty much identical to the normal sized world. In fact, the science fiction leaves the room after the first 40 minutes and we're left with a boring, pointless attempt to justify the movie. A failed attempt, I should add.

Cinema Sins would have a field day with this movie. For one thing, apparently no one stops to consider how dangerous it would be to live as a tiny weak creature. You would be easy prey for almost every animal on the planet. A cat would toy with you, then kill you. A dog would crush you in his jaws. A rat would chew you up. Even a frog might eat you. Countless birds of prey would dine on you and your kind. Even chickens would peck you to death and eat you. Spiders would wrap you in silk and inject you with eggs. Just imagine what bees and mosquitos would do to you.

The amount of suspension of disbelief this movie requires is... well... unbelievable. It's a ridiculous premise to begin with, and was very poorly implemented.

Now, as a horror movie, it has some potential, but obviously they didn't choose to take it in that direction. But should have. It would have been scary as hell to wake up downsized and having to run and hide from rabbits and squirrels and scorpions. As an alternative to capital punishment or child rapists, it makes sense.

Save yourself 2 hours and watch something else!
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A satisfying swords-and-sorcery fantasy flick for a rainy night
28 April 2018
It's not high art, but in my opinion this pentology is a worthy effort and well worth watching. It starts off slow with part 1 (A Quest for Heroes) featuring a slave girl (Melanie Stone) gradually coming into her power as a necromancer, or sorceress wielding dark magic.

Although the first movie has a satisfying ending, you may still thirst for more adventures in the Mythica universe. Fortunately, there are four more, queued up and ready to roll!

The movies gather steam, and darkness, culminating in The Godslayer, the high-stakes finale of the series. There is enough magic, and swords, and evil sorcerers, and good sorceresses, and even a couple of gods, to satisfy everyone.

Some people call it some kind of B-grade kickstarter movie, but in my opinion it's a captivating and charming series, B or C or whatever. The actors are sincere and skillful, the writing moves the story along, and the special effects (where they even exist) are minimalist but effective.

Now I wonder if there will ever be a sequel, but really, five movies is plenty, and in 2-3 years I will definitely be watching this one again!
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Supergirl (2015–2021)
3/10
A good concept, marred by mediocre writing and excessive political correctness
23 April 2018
Warning: Spoilers
I want to love Supergirl. I grew up on D.C. comics, and though I was more of a Batman/Superman kind of kid, SG was definitely in that pantheon of childhood escapism.

Unfortunately, this series is just lacking something. I have a 13-year-old girl and she loved the first season; we watched it as a family. We just finally made it to the end of season 2, and the politics are finally getting to me. I don't think I'm going to re-up for season 3.

The first season had a certain innocence and charm about it although of course the writing and storylines were inane. You chalk it up to the fact that it's a comicbook writ large. Still, you'd think they could figure out how to fill in a few of the enormous plotholes.

But season two lost some of that innocence. Suddenly, Kara has a boyfriend. Suddenly, she's a serious reporter. Suddenly, Cat Grant is gone. Suddenly, Kara's sister is a lesbian. And suddenly, all those escaped super-criminals from Fort Rozz are gone, replaced by innocent and sympathetic "illegal aliens" being hunted down by evil white supremacist types. At one point, they even said an evil invader wanted to "make the world great again". (Admittedly, the invader was an alien, but whatever.)

Season Three delves even more deeply into left wing ideology, with Cat Grant piously pronouncing that global warming is real and the President can add two plus two, an apparent jibe at Donald Trump and other politicians who have backed off from the Paris climate treaty and other environmental causes.

Thanks, but no thanks. I'm done with this Hollywood ideological stink heap. Perhaps they'll discover that jumping into politics will anger some of their viewership, or perhaps it will help their ratings with the 50% or so of the population that agrees with them. The country is split down the middle and one half hates the other half. Leave it to Hollywood to try to exploit that with pious preaching from the Girl of Steel.
8 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Defenders (2017)
5/10
Great concept marred by poor writing
28 August 2017
Warning: Spoilers
I wanted to love this show. DD1 and JJ are excellent television. I'm not familiar enough with Luke Cage and Iron Fist to have an opinion, but Luke Cage was quite good in JJ.

This series, however... so bad. The writing, especially the dialogue, seemed contrived and added as an afterthought. The producer must have said: Let's have Jessica say something cynical right about now ("It's back!" - referring to DD's suit, when a real person would have said - "Oh good, you're wearing your armored suit." or else nothing). She was so unprofessional and unpleasant that she inspired not endearment and sympathy but repugnance and annoyance.

Luke Cage spent about half of the series trying to rescue some loser kid who ended up working for the Hand and getting killed. There was absolutely nothing redeemable about this kid. He was so annoying and stupid that you heave a sigh of relief when he's finally gone.

The Hand was supposed to be this super powerful, super secret, evil cabal that ruled the world. Oops. Someone forgot to tell the writers that. Sigourney Weaver plays the idiot who runs the Hand, who seems more interested in culinary arts and fashionable clothing than in being the evil mistress of crime that she supposedly is.

By the way, at the beginning of the series it's revealed that she has some kind of fatal disease. So what does she do? She wastes the rest of their immortality potion on Electra. Somehow, Electra doesn't figure out that Alexandra is dying, despite her obvious spells of weakness, and suddenly stabs her. Why not just wait a month or two?

The guy who insists on speaking Japanese to everyone... oh, don't even bother. He was actually interesting and kind of cool at the start, when describing the process of stalking and killing a bear. But beyond that, he seemed to have zero personality. Luckily for him, everyone around him understands Japanese perfectly, and he understands English perfectly since everyone always answers him in English. I was so glad to see him die. I sure hope he stays dead.

Madame Gao, who was both evil and fascinatingly civilized in DD, actually had the most personality of the otherwise boring and stupid Hand. She also had amazing powers to make large objects like cars slide across the room. I hope she survives because I actually liked her, unlike almost every other character in this wretched show.

It appears that Matt and Jessica were developing some kind of chemistry, but it was contrived and forced. Not believable.

Really, the most interesting character should have been Elektra, but she basically played a soulless killing machine all through the series, breaking down and kissing Matt only during the very last 10 minutes or so. I don't know whether to laugh or cry. A wasted part. She could have been great, but just didn't have the script to make her great.

The fight scenes were also contrived and hardly believable. People moved too slowly for ninjas. Come on; even amateur karate sparring matches look better than this. Martial arts are all about speed, and these people are supposed to be super ninjas.

Jessica Henwick in particular seemed unsuited for her role. She handled her sword awkwardly and moved weakly, almost sluggishly. That she was a trained assassin/ninja was laughable. Her teacher as well.

Next we come to Stick. Oh, what a disappointment. Stick was Matthew Murdock's teacher, a member of the Chaste, a blind yet invincible warrior with a similar ability to Matt's. Yet, he foolishly decided to kill Danny Iron Fist which led to disastrous consequences, his own death among them. Elektra took him down with childish ease. Stick was a survivor and should not have been rubbed out like that. Elektra was (supposedly) a bad-ass, sure, but Stick was Stick. He should have had a ton more wisdom and bad-assery in this show, and should have lived, too.

Misty - the detective - was incredibly annoying. Let's start with the hair. I'm sure that NYPD really lets its detectives wear $300 doos. Very professional looking. And man, was she annoying, with her stupid intonations like "you're in big trouble. You'd better 'fess up."

Oh was I disappointed that she didn't die. Cops don't shoot in doors and go plunging into the unknown. That's not standard protocol. They call for back-up, and go in force. So what does she do? She shoots in a door, and plunges into the unknown and gets her arm chopped off by a ninja. Who she could have easily shot except somehow he was bulletproof or really fast at deflecting bullets, another unexplained power.

OK that's enough plot holes for now. Have I convinced you to skip this series? Or to write to Netflix and beg them, plead with them, to get better writers for the next season? Though, I highly doubt there will be a second season. The first one was so wretched. But, I've been wrong before.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Jason Bourne (I) (2016)
4/10
Disappointing
16 December 2016
Warning: Spoilers
There is nothing new in this movie. It's just a rehash of the previous Jason Bourne movies, it is formulaic, poorly thought out, and disappointingly shallow.

First of all: Jason Bourne??? Why not David Webb? He knows his real name, but everyone still calls him by his programmed name in this movie. There's a lame line or two about how "You're not David Webb; he no longer exists" but you know, that's BS.

Next: The Asset. That's all we get on this super assassin dude who's chasing Bourne/Webb all through the movie. No name, no humanity except a brief comment that he was tortured in Syria for two years and blames it all on Webb's dad. So that's his motivation.

Then poor Nicky gets about 10 minutes before she's unceremoniously snuffed by the Asset, He Who Must Not Be Named.

Next: the German (or something) hacker dude who helps Bourne decrypt the secret black ops files that of course we all know all about, having seen the previous movies. Bourne's great revelation is that his dad was involved but was too much of a "good guy" and therefore had to be snuffed.

For some reason, the hacker dude decides he hates Bourne and tries to kill him by throwing a chair or something at him (honestly I don't even remember what he threw, that's how un memorable the scene was), despite Bourne holding a gun and being a notoriously tough and deadly super assassin.

Then there's Bourne's frenemy in the agency, agent Heather Lee. She's oddly cast and has a slight Swedish accent at times, which makes sense since she's Swedish. She's beautiful in a doll like way (Ex Machina) but does not evoke a seasoned agent. Actually Ex Machina was the perfect role that it appears she is merely reprising in J.B. She is robotic to the point where we really can't relate to her as a human being at all. She's also impossibly smart, and inexplicably treacherous. You want to like her as a counterpoint to the villainous director who is constantly ordering people (including her) to be killed, but she's completely unlikeable.

Bourne (sorry, but his name obviously has to remain Jason Bourne since that's the name of the franchise and they're not going to change the name of the movie to "David Webb", obviously) spends the next hour and 50 minutes predictably zeroing in on the latest incarnation of an evil agency director who keeps declaring ominously and boringly that it's time for Bourne to be "taken out". Needless to say, the hacker dude pays for his extremely dumb mistake.

Even the fight scenes were lacking something. They got lazy and just skipped the actual combat choreography, relying instead on chaotic and disjointed camera work to convey a fight. But it didn't convey much to me except to make me slightly dizzy.

There were several obligatory chase scenes, some on motorcycle and some in cars. Probably the best scene in the movie was when a vehicle came crashing through the front doors of a glitzy Vegas casino and right into the gambling area. Somebody spent a lot of money on that one; I hope they didn't have to do too many takes. Actually, no, I hope they had to do a lot of takes. That's how little I care about the numb-skulls who produced this thing.

The fact is, I could go on and on, but it's not worth it. This movie was simply not fun enough, not interesting enough, and definitely not worth your money enough. I only watched it because I got a $0.99 deal on Google Play and now I'm wishing I could get my $0.99 back even though that wouldn't even buy half a popcorn at a movie theatre.

Save your money. If you crave Jason Bourne, watch one of the first three movies which are well done. Really, just the first movie stands on its own and needs no derivative and repetitious sequels.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Still holds up over 30 years later
11 June 2016
I just re-watched this movie; the last time I saw it was approximately 1987. For a 1984 production, this is superb science fiction. The Terminator, like Blade Runner, represents the best of the early '80s and even today has not really been surpassed despite decades of advances in CGI, digital processing, etc.

The Terminator robot behaves more or less as one might expect. James Cameron is intelligent enough not to ruin the movie by anthropomorphizing the robot, in other words making it display emotions and behave too humanly. It's a computer created by computers, and acts accordingly. Arnold Schwarzenegger was at his physical peak and did a superb job conveying the sheer evil that this machine represents.

Sarah and Kyle were well played. She was an "average girl" working at a busy family restaurant and dating mediocre guys in her spare time. We watch her grow into the strong soldier that she must become to defeat not only the Terminator but to raise a revolutionary hero who will save humanity.

Kyle came across as a soldier who is very good at his profession, but has little exposure to the finer things, having grown up in a horrible post-apocalyptic world. He finally softens and opens up to Sarah, sparking a love affair that is heartbreakingly brief.

You can enjoy the Terminator and simply ignore the fact that there are sequels. #2 is not bad, but quite superfluous and contradictory to the first movie in which it was made clear that "no one goes home, and no one else comes through" the time machine which was smashed by the humans. The first movie is an epic story and needs no sequels. But #2 is fun if you must see a little more Arnold-as-robot.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Curiosity: I, Caveman (2011)
Season 1, Episode 9
8/10
Fun and informative
15 January 2015
Warning: Spoilers
I, Caveman is a 2-part documentary about 10 more-or-less ordinary modern people trying to survive under Paleolithic conditions for 10 days. They have primitive tools, are given primitive shelter and animal skin clothing, and must find a way to feed and hydrate themselves. They must use a primitive method to light a fire. It's harder than it sounds.

An expert panel observe from a distance and toss in their bits of wisdom from time to time. All in all, it's a fairly well done documentary, though it will not appeal to the short attention spans and craving for titillation that typify the average TV viewer today.

Pretty much, you can predict after the first 15 minutes which of them will make it and which will drop out. The ones who boast the most turn out to be the least well equipped mentally to make it. The humble ones do the best. Good old human nature; nothing really ever changes.

Some of the most impressive ones in the group were Billy and Manu. Manu, despite having problems with the cold weather, demonstrates tremendous resourcefulness and mental fortitude. She fashions a charcoal water filter for the group, catches trout by hand from a stream, and helps bring down a big game animal.

Billy is an outdoors author and bow maker who has extensive knowledge of primitive skills such as hunting and flint knapping. He brings a lot of useful skills and knowhow to the group and you can just imagine him surviving out there for 10 months instead of a mere 10 days.

Various of the others bring their own skills. Rob, the writer, manages to bring down a big game animal with an atlatl dart, a pretty dazzling piece of marksmanship that had even the expert panel gushing with amazement.

Billy and Manu end up appearing on episodes of Naked and Afraid, another Discovery series that features survivalists in the nude. Predictably, they both demonstrate masterful survival skills.

10 days is a pretty short period of time in which to conduct this experiment. I would have rather seen them out there for a month or so, to make it real. Or come back in a year and see if anyone's still alive! Of course, that's not practical; it probably costs hundreds of thousands of dollars a day to run a production like this, so ten is all we get. But it's fun to watch, interesting if you like to learn about survival skills, and the ending is uplifting.

I would have liked to learn more specifics about edible plants and techniques for building shelters. They shared some information but there's only so much they can say in two hours. The experts didn't really say anything we didn't already know, honestly. "Bringing down big game is a cause for celebration." True but not an astonishing revelation by any stretch.

I know this sort of show doesn't appeal to the masses, but I hope that Discovery will do more of them and thus help young people "discover" more about the world around them.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Prometheus (I) (2012)
1/10
Execrable
24 April 2014
First the positives. Done.

Now on to the negatives. The entire movie was a horrible exercise in trying to make money without doing any real work.

The plot, such as it was, did not hang together. There were holes a- plenty, as pointed out by countless others in the reviews and message board.

The characters had no apparent motivation for what they did, and some of what they did made no sense. The android, at least, had an excuse--he's a machine. Machines can be incorrectly programmed. The humans, however--inexcusable.

The acting? Mediocre. The best thing I can say about the movie is that a few of the special effects were good. Aside from that, don't waste your time.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Awkward. (2011–2016)
7/10
High School as One Big Orgy
19 October 2013
I love this show; I just discovered it a couple of weeks ago on Amazon Prime and I've been catching up. Ashley Rickards is great as an "awkward" yet charmingly sincere high school student. The supporting cast is fantastic, and the writing is witty.

As your basic scrawny and awkward male geek all through high school and university, I didn't "get any". No girlfriend, no dates, no dances, no relationship drama. Just books and violin and parties with other geeks where we'd talk about Star Wars and games and you name it. In fact, I find this whole show to be almost completely alien to my own experiences; these characters seem to spend all their time on relationships and almost none of it on academics.

Yet, it's fun to watch nonetheless, a vicarious re-living of high school the way the big advertisers would want you to have done--spending a lot of time on makeup, clothing, cars, consumer electronics, and of course glamorous outfits and parties and bedroom liaisons.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Naked and Afraid (2013– )
8/10
Pretty good, I guess I'd probably starve out there so kudos to them.
30 June 2013
Warning: Spoilers
It's pretty easy to be an armchair quarterback, I suppose. This show "Naked and afraid" is supposed to be a reality show with an on-site camera crew documenting two people, a man and woman (who are unacquainted), as they attempt to survive three weeks in a remote part of the world without even the clothes on their backs.

The first episode takes place in a Costa Rican jungle.

Apart from one video camera each to help document their story, Kim and Shane are each issued one item of their choice to help with survival. She has a machete, and he has a flint-and- steel fire starter. So, it's not exactly Adam and Eve (and for that matter, there's no sex in this episode so forget about watching it if that's your primary interest).

The nudity becomes boring after the first minute or so. They are both outdoors types, physically well built and athletic, although at age 45 he's developing a bit of a spare tire (which is gone after 21 days of near starvation--gee, maybe I should sign up for an episode!). Clearly they are both comfortable in their skin and do not exhibit much inhibition. That said, Kim weaves some rudimentary loin cloths for them both early on, and she wears leaves over her breasts for much of the time, although they never do find a way to protect their feet.

I was surprised at how cold the jungle was for them. I have been to the rain forests of Costa Rica in September and it was quite hot, and people do go there at Christmas time to enjoy a nice warm surfing vacation. But, I suppose when you're hungry, unclothed, and being rained on every other day, you're going to get chilled at night.

I was also surprised at how difficult it was to get food. In a tropical jungle, you are literally surrounded by living creatures. It's such a rich ecology that I found it hard to believe there wasn't something edible within three feet of any given location. Shane admits early on that he's not a jungle person; he is not used to having a canopy of trees over his head.

Nonetheless, both he and Kim seem to know a lot about wildlife. It was cool to see him capture and decapitate that nasty snake--that really was a courageous act, given it is one of the most poisonous creatures in the world and one of its kind nearly killed the producer a few days earlier. I was waiting for them to down a howler monkey and feast on it for supper, but Shane put the kibosh on that idea, reporting that the animals were far stronger and more ferocious than the humans could imagine.

In many parts of Africa and Asia, creatures such as grasshoppers, beetles, grubs, ants, larvae, etc. are regularly dined upon. I suppose it's easier said than done, especially with no nets, skewers, or cooking vessels.

But it was distressing to watch them just sitting there, day after day, becoming weaker and more listless and even less able to forage for food. The turtle and the snake appear to have been their only meals during the entire three weeks, and for Kim at least, the turtle turned out to be a bit of a disaster.

The NY Post reports that Kim actually received some food and an IV for dehydration after her food poisoning scare, and Shane actually broke three toes on the fourth day (they didn't say what treatment he received, if any), and this was not related during the show, so I knock two stars off for dishonesty and non-disclosure.

Shane has some anger management issues, as Kim points out more than once. He had a pretty awful childhood and in fact I found myself sympathizing with him, although I did not agree with his annoyance at Kim. Kim, for her part, is charming and level headed and it's interesting at the end that she is the one with the energy and drive and the diplomacy to carry the day, insisting that they approach the pick-up spot hand-in-hand, as friends and not as the extremely drained and irritable co-conspirators that they had become. And I loved Kim's war paint that she put on at the end--very cool!

Despite the cheating, it was still fun to watch, somewhat agonizing at times as you empathize with these tough but increasingly desperate people struggling to get a foothold in a very unforgiving place.

EDIT: My review was entirely about the first episode. Since then, I have watched a second episode during which they were up front about the crew coming in and administering medical help for an infected foot. Kudos to them for being straightforward about it.
12 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Craft (1996)
3/10
Disappointing script, dumb dialog, fun effects
7 March 2011
Warning: Spoilers
I pulled this up on Netflix last night because I couldn't sleep. Now I wish I'd just taken a sleeping pill... or 2... or 3.... It was not worth it.

It's a special effects movie for the 16-28 male crowd who want to watch pretty girls in Catholic School miniskirts get revenge on bullies and dicks.

Otherwise, it's a waste of time. The dialog was poorly written; I don't blame the actors who, for the most part, delivered their lines more or less competently, but when you have such awful material to work with, how real can you possibly be?

The morality play was predictable and shallow. There was the obligatory snobby racist blond chick ("I don't like Negroids") and the dumb and malicious jock who wants to get Sarah (Robin Tunney) in the sack. I didn't buy either of those characters (the jock looked and sounded about 24 to me, definitely not a teenager).

The vengeance on the crazy girl at the end was pathetic. Listen up, kiddies: evil, bad, crazy people deserve to be locked up like wild animals in gray concrete cells. Yeah, that'll show'em.

Don't waste your precious time on this one; there are many better movies out there. I will say, the special effects were good. But not good enough to carry this loser.
6 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Nancy Drew (2007)
9/10
A fun and wholesome movie
25 February 2011
Warning: Spoilers
This movie has some serious deficiencies by modern standards: No sex. One kiss. A little bit of violence.

Had it come out 40 years ago or so, it would be considered a classic. But in this cynical modern age--the worst aspects of which Nancy seems to reject--people are missing the ingredients that make for a successful Hollywood hit.

I enjoyed the movie. It's a bit predictable, the children's acting is uneven, and the plot was a bit silly. But Emma Roberts as Nancy was outstanding. I enjoyed watching her interpret her character with such sincerity. She was witty, composed, in control, and powerful.

My main regret is that they've waited so long to produce the sequel; Nancy was 16 or 17 when this movie was made, and she'll be 20 in 2011. But, Hollywood has a way with makeup and smoke and mirrors, so we may not notice too much of an age difference.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A letdown, poorly written.
19 July 2008
Warning: Spoilers
OK, I've read some of the reviews and commentary on this movie, and I just don't get it. I did not enjoy this movie as much as the first one. Something was just missing. Hellboy 1 had more soul. #2 was just a bunch of action scenes tied together and with a thin veneer of "personal chemistry" thrown in to make the viewer feel drawn in emotionally. But it didn't work on me. I really, really wanted it to, and I waited breathlessly for this release. The trailers were great, but the movie did not deliver.

In Hellboy 1, we witness a creature from another world who is wallowing in his self-pity and conflicts borne of his differentness--he was raised as human by his human step-father, but he is too different to fit in. Forced to revert to a demon of destruction by the forces of evil, he comes to the brink of destroying the world. Then he is reminded of his humanity by John Meyers just in time to avert calamity. Thus we learn that all sentient creatures, whether human or wanna-be human, can take charge of their destiny; we can overcome our programming.

Then there was the romantic triangle that formed between Meyers, Liz, and Hellboy. Liz was a confused, troubled girl who sort of loved Hellboy but was so afraid of her power that she withdrew into a shell. Meyers drew her out of that shell, and in the process fell in love with her (or at least developed a bit of a crush). In the end, Liz herself realized her responsibilities and loyalties in time to save her buddy Hellboy and thus she came into her full power as a super hero and a woman.

Hoo boy. What a world they created. Now we come to Hellboy 2. Meyers is inexplicably gone, even though Dr. Broom specifically recruited him to continue HB's lessons in being human. Abe has changed, and oh, do I miss Michael Lindsay's voice! I have read that Lindsay wanted Doug Jones to recite his own lines, so I guess he got what he wanted, and as a result the delicate and humorous Abe we came to know in HB 1 is gone. Oh yes, and Abe was willing without hesitation to cravenly betray humanity because of his love for the Princess. Sorry, I don't buy that. This isn't the same Abe.

Tom Manning has also changed--he was a take-charge guy before, butting heads with Hellboy all through the first movie, but in the end he was won over and the two came to have a mutual respect. Now, suddenly he's reduced to bribing Hellboy with cigars to not show himself in public. What happened? Manning was useless and contemptible in this movie.

I don't see the point of Kraus except as more eye candy. Evidently they were hoping Kraus would add some humor and tension to the story, but it didn't really work. But he was an interesting creature, nonetheless.

The elves wore too much makeup and the princess behaved strangely. The prince, at least, had some motivation in this movie, unlike almost everyone else. But he was also either a psychopath who would unhesitatingly slaughter his father or else the elves are just different from us humans. Not very believable in either case.

Oh, and Hellboy became weaker in this movie. He was a powerful, kick-butt demon in the first one, and now he gets knocked on his ass by every monster that comes along. He gets a magical razor in his chest and almost dies. What happened to the Hellboy we knew from HB1?

Lastly, and sadly, was the ridiculous scene at the end where the agents quit. Huh? Since when had the Department become an evil big bad boss that deserved to be treated so shabbily? They took these freaks in, trained them, helped them to have a niche in a hostile world, and together they protected humanity from the "things that go bump in the night". This is Professor Broom's legacy. Now, as if to show how little they think of Prof. Broom, Hellboy and his gang just walked away from Manning, leaving him plaintively crying for them to come back. And where exactly were they going? To live on a commune of mutants and freaks somewhere in Ireland, where they happened to be stranded? Brilliant writing, guys, this really ties everything together--not!!!

I could go on and on. Well, it's only a movie. But I am really disappointed.
17 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
What makes a true hero?
24 June 2005
The Incredibles is a fantasy, a study in what makes a true hero, a superbly done animation, and a real story. How did they achieve all of these things, and in an era of greed and blockbuster-oriented movies-by-committee? Disney/Pixar gave writer/director Brad Bird the freedom to fully exploit his considerable talents, and we have this resulting masterpiece.

When I first heard of this movie, I assumed it was a children's film and put it on my back burner list of movies to eventually see. When I finally got a hold of the DVD I was amazed to discover that it is in fact a sophisticated, humorous, and affectionate poke at superhero movies and comic books. In fact, you can take the movie as a giant comic book on one level, but on another level there is some significant social commentary.

What makes a true hero? Is it his or her talents and abilities (in this case, the ability to knock down buildings or stretch like a rubber band or run super-fast)? Or is it something more subtle, something in the spirit, the courage to face up to one's foibles and weaknesses and overcome them and in doing so, make the world a better place. Is it better to celebrate mediocrity, the concept that everyone is "special", or should we not celebrate the exceptional ones among us, uplift them and admire them for their special contributions to the world? If you are a thoughtful person, this movie will leave you asking these questions. It will also leave you laughing--the dialogue is hilarious, the characters realistic and believable. The romance-obsessed teenager, the mischievous little boy, the housewife who is suppressing her true heroic nature, and the husband withering away in a cube farm--these are people you meet every day, and you might be one of them. I can relate to the cube farm, myself.

I highly recommend this movie, and I eagerly await Mr. Bird's next effort.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed