mw1562 Reviews

Mannequin (1976)

Judith Fritsch delivers the goods

[10/10 · 21 January 2020]

Judith Fritsch is, or was, an attractive brunette with short hair, slim figure and pretty face. She did mostly softcore, but eventually did hardcore, as this film attests to. The highlight of the film is a group sex scene featuring Ms. Fritsch and four studs, all of whom are extremely well-endowed.

The camerawork is sketchy, but that is the only complaint in an otherwise entertaining use of time.

Tiny4k: Billiard Baby (2017) Season Unknown, Episode Unknown

amazing video

[10/10 · 7 July 2019]

The first few minutes plays like a MTV music video, with actress Sierra Nicole dancing around a billiard table, using the cue stick and balls as props. Had the video simply ended there, before the introduction of a male actor and subsequent sex, it would have been great on its own. I suppose its good to see the hot babe have sex after her erotic dancing routine, but for me the hardcore sex was superfluous.

I've watched several Sierra Nicole videos, and they're pretty much all the same, but this one is different, if only for the opening dance routine.

Agent 77 (1970)

better than most from this era

[8/10 · 20 September 2018]

I really enjoyed the film, which is a silly piece of fluff that allows porn regular John Keith to ham it up by playing a flaming homosexual spy to the hilt. Hie acting talent, or lack thereof, notwithstanding, the film is appealing for several reasons.

Of the five women who appear in the film, I recognized only one, Maria Arnold, and her scene is superfluous to the plot, just an added insert to fill up space. But while the busty Ms. Arnold did more softcore than hard, here she goes hardcore all the way in one of her best scenes ever recorded. Two other women also stand out; they play secret agents who are holding someone prisoner; naturally by tying him up naked. John Keith eventually finds him, but only after he to is tied up and forced to have sex with a gorgeous woman, which allows him to fidget and squirm in the most blatantly gay way possible. The two women in question are new to the industry. I have watched a lot of films from the era, and i do not recall having seen them before.

One of the woman is a tall, leggy vixen with reddish blonde hair and a short mini, looking quite voluptuous. She looks a lot like Jane Tsentas, a porn regular from the era. Her sex scene really rocks; part female domination, part cfnm (even though the genre didn't even exist back then). The sexual foreplay was highly erotic, with a lot of fondling and touching the bound, naked man. The most stunning of the actresses to appear in the film didn't even have a sex role. Had she, this film would have gotten my highest rating.

In summation, one could do a lot worse than Agent 77, a lot, lot worse,

Never Enough (1971)

had some redeeming value

[8/10 · 27 October 2017]

I agree with everything the first reviewer said when it comes to this film, yet I thought the brunette in the white dress with the puffy sleeves was extremely attractive. She was the one female n the foul who I didn't recognize, and she doesn't appear in the IMDb film credits.

Was she a one-hit wonder? I believe so. She has two scenes, including a reasonably hot threesome with Sunny Boyd and some lucky guy.

This is pretty much why I have watched the movie more than once. Most people watch these films because they find a particular player t their liking, and this is the case with the anonymous brunette in the white dress with the puffy sleeves. She just had a certain something that appealed to me. And being a one-hit wonder adds a certain element of mystery.

Harem Hangups (1970)

don't bother

[1/10 · 16 October 2016]

I actually had the misfortune of watching this film. I'm not even sure how I caem across it; probably because Jane Tsentas was listed in the credits.

I literally spent the entire time with my finger on the fast-forward button, not slowing down for a moment, not even when Jane Tsentas appeared on the scene. I would tell you what the plot consisted of, except that i don't think there was a plot.

This was one of the worst films ever made of the genre and the era. I regret that I'll never get back the thirty minutes or so that I sent on this turekey.

The Aphrodisans (1970)

Too much of nothing

[3/10 · 20 August 2016]

The other person who reviewed this film pretty much hit the nail on the head. Most of the time watching this film is spent in the fast-forward mode, but there a couple of redeeming features that made the film almost worthwhile, the key word being "almost".

Early in the film Kathy Hilton and Jane Tsentas arrive at the party house by automobile. That enables them to wear some of the shortest mini-skirts on record. Both women are extremely hot, for the genre and the era, and at the very least, their entrance in the film prompted me to screen the film in normal speed for a while.

Kathy Hilton pairs off with Norman Fields, who plays the role 'big daddy' to the motley group of hippies. She's naked when we next see her. As for Jane Tsentas, at least the viewer has the pleasure of seeing her strip down and put on a bathing suit.

Of course, if the sight of Jane Tsentas putting on a bathing suit is the highlight of a film then it is safe to assume the the film hasn't much to offer.

Sex Ritual of the Occult (1970)

could have been better, but still okay

[8/10 · 12 August 2016]

I liked this film, but it had the potential to be a classic. First of all, there are the woman, five in all, but three of them are legendary beauties for the genre: Neola Graef (Malta), Jeannine Anderson and Kathy Hilton.

Ms. Hilton's scene is borderline hardcore, which she did not do often. Jeannine Anderson has a scene where she is clearly performing fellatio on a lucky dude (he also has Malta sitting on his face at the same time). Ms. Anderson didn't appear in a lot of films, and this is the only one I know of where she did hardcore. Thus the film has a lot going for it.

Now on to the bad: twice during the film an extended sex scene dissolves into a psychedelic kaleidoscope of artsy-fartsy imagery that is extremely annoying.

In many instances the camera work could have been better, as well as the lighting

SPOILER ALERT: There is a lightly themed gay scene that features mostly simulated sex, but with a tiny amount of penis touching.

The Family (1970)

waste of time, but still watchable

[12 August 2016]

This is another one of those films that could have been a contender. Unfortunately, it isn't. Malta (Neola Graef) appears in what was probably her most explicit film ever. There is one scene in which she is allegedly giving some guy head, but is mostly obscured by her hair. When she pulls back, his erect penis gets tangled up in her hair. In fact, the guy is erect almost exclusively during his scene with Malta. That's pretty much all of the positive.

Malta is usually very attractive, but in this film she is overweight and looks drugged out. It is possible that the drugged out effect was deliberate, as she is playing a stoned hippie, but the weight gain is unfortunate. However, she is still one of my all time favorites.

Were it not for the appearance of Malta I would have discarded this DVD from my collection after one viewing. That pretty much sums it up.

Dead Eye Dick (1970)

definitely watchable

[6/10 · 12 August 2016]

Was this this a great film? No. But it features Jeanine Anderson and Neola Graef, who are two of my all-time favorite porn actresses, so in my opinion, it is worthwhile. William Howard plays a PI who ends up having simulated sex with a bunch of women. Uschi Digard is one of the women, which will please some people.

Malta (Neola Graef) has two scenes: one with William Howard and one with Pete Dawson, the only other male in the film. Jeannine Anderson has two scenes with the busy Mr. Howard, one at the beginning and one at the end of the film.

I don't know a lot about Jeanine Anderson, but is is extremely hot!

Terror at Orgy Castle (1971)

surprisingly good

[9/10 · 12 August 2016]

For reasons I can't quite comprehend, I love this movie. At first glance it appears that there was dialogue, as you can see the actors' lips moving, but on the surviving version of the film the dialogue is replaced by a voice- over narration.

Bill and Lisa play a married couple who spend their honeymoon at a spooky and mysterious castle. Lisa is stunning; both sexy and gorgeous, wearing the most garish and ugly miniskirt that the early 1970's had to offer. I have no idea who the actress is who played Lisa, and I don't recall having seen her in any other film, which is a shame. She is worth the price oaf admission by herself. Her husband is played by porn veteran William Howard, and if you are a fan of his penis then you will be sated, as it appears frequently throughout the film.

In perhaps the film's best scene, succubus Jane Tsentas appears in Bill and Lisa's bedroom and she has strong simulated sex. At first the audience can see the effect that Ms. Tsentas is having on his penis, but then he, unfortunately, lifts his leg to obscure the visual. Still, the scene is hot. There's a lot of other stuff going on, but you get the idea.

Sexophrenia (1970)

Jane Tsentas almost saves a boring film

[6/10 · 12 August 2016]

This film doesn't have much going for it. John Keith and Jane Tsentas play a married couple. It seems that the husband likes to degrade his wife, and the wife doesn't seem to mind. We get several and tedious sex scenes between the two, including some extremely explicit close-ups of Jane Tsentas' vagina, that could almost pass for a government issued instructional film on anatomy.

Midway through the films John Keith has simulated sex with porn veteran Suzanne Fields, and the film ends with probably its best scene. Another couple show up and they switch partners. Jane Tsentas performs an unexpected and unusually erotic penis petting sequence with the actor, which was about as close as she would come do doing hardcore, at least until the film "The Godmother" came out a few years later.

If you a member of the Jane Tsentas cult then this film will appeal to you, for obvious reasons. If not, then don't waste your time with this one.

The Erotic Adventures of Hercules (1971)

wasted potential

[11 August 2016]

I saw this film when it first same out, and my hazy memory was that is was above average for its genre. It is now available on DVD and I managed to see it again. The premise of the film is promising, but the sets are cheap, the script is weak and the direction is spotty. On the plus side, one of the actresses is gorgeous, the sex is hardcore and filmed as well as the technology of the time allowed. The best scene for me is the last one where Hercules is chained and gets fake whipped and then felted for real,

With a larger budget this film could have been a contender. Casting a more muscular Hercules night have helped too. I think it is worth watching as a history lesson for what passed as smut in 1970. Beyond that, watch it at your own risk.

Homer... The Late Comer (1970)

a classic from its era

[3/10 · 11 August 2016]

This 1970 film is not available on a DVD collection. This film is on the cusp of the era when soft core turned into hardcore, and the film offers a little bit of both. Homer is a middle aged slob who fantasizes about women. He ends up having two sex scenes with the same women. I don't know here name, but she is very pretty, with an exceptional body and a pretty face. There is a little genital fondling, but that's as close as it comes to hardcore.

The other scene is with Debra Christian and a nameless, faceless man. Her scene is a little closer to hardcore, but quite. It looks as if she might be doing hardcore, but is it not 100% certain. The closeups are too close to know who is actually appearing on the screen.

Overall the film is a waste of time, other than as a history lesson. If you like buxom actresses then there might be some appeal. A lot of people like the transitional period between hardcore and soft core, and this film might appeal to them.

Girl Acrobatics (1971)

for fans of Jane Tsentas

[8/10 · 11 August 2016]

Leggy blonde Jane Tsentas had a cult following during the late 60's early 70's porn scene in Los Angeles. She mostly did soft core simulation sex, but every now and then something appears that suggests she may have done some hardcore. This short is definitely soft core, but the oral scene at the beginning comes pretty copse to hardcore. This makes it worth viewing for her cult of fans. Very few women wear a miniskirt as well as she does, but unfortunately she is wearing pants this time around.

If you are not a member of the Jane Tsentas cult then this short will offer you no reason to watch.

The Big Snatch (II) (1971)

doesn't reach its potential

[3/10 · 11 August 2016]

For some reason the director had actress Jane Tsentas appear in the film and barely used her. She appears as a leader of a girl gang, who rape two men. Jane watches as the other two gang members have sex with the captive men. What a waste of talent.

Other than that, the film is standard stuff from the early days of porn, although it goes get a bit tedious near the end.

The other cast members are mostly from the standard talent pool that was available at the time, although Mindy Wilson, who plays one of the female gang members, is usually worth watching. The young blonde who has sex with the lead character is cute, in a 1970 sort of way.

If only Jane Tsentas had more to do, I'd give the film a higher rating

Ruby (1992)

Why did Ruby do it - things the government didn't tell you

[21 November 2011]

The reason why Jack Ruby Killed Lee Harvey Oswald was had he not done so he would have been killed himself. Sam Giancana had put Ruby in charge of the JFK assassination, and part of the plan was for Officer Tippett to kill Oswald as he was trying to escape. That didn't happen, for reasons unknown, so Ruby had to finish the job himself.

The real question is how was Jack Ruby able to walk right up to the most heavily guarded man in America, guarded as he was by Secret Service, FBI, CIA, Texas State Troopers, and Dallas Police, and shoot him at point blank range. That alone should tell you that Lee Harvey Oswald did not act alone.

The government would tell you that Ruby acted alone, for reasons of grief and rage, etc, but they don't want you to know the truth. They don't think we could handle the truth. They don't want us to know that JFK and his father made a deal with Sam Giancana to get elected and, once elected, the Kennedys reneged on their end of the deal.

By the way, did you know that Lee Harvey Oswald was raised by his uncle in New Orleans, who was a bookie, and did you know that in 1963 all bookmakers worked for the mob? Why would the New Orleans District Attorney (Garrison) get involved in a crime that took place in Dallas? It is all related.

Did you know that several weeks after the JFK assassination the Texas State Attorney General held a press conference and announced that Oswald worked for the CIA? Did you know that Oswald attended Naval Intelligence School, and shortly thereafter he went to Russia, officially as a US dissenter, but more likely as a spy?