This is not a terrible show, but it is certainly confused as to what it wants to be. Is it a reinterpretation of Stephen King's Castle Rock for casual. viewers or a faithful addition to the lore for Constant Readers? Is it a one season show or multiple season show?
First off, the show confuses itself by intertwining some aspects of Castle Rock law, with references to Cujo etc. But doesn't incorporate the lore of other books, such as Needful Things - which is super important if you're going to have Alan Pangborn as main character.
This is very important as we know that Alan Pangborn is not only a hero but well versed in the mystery of Castle Rock - and so he shouldn't be so oblivious to the strange happenings that we see in the show Castle Rock. We also know that at the end of Needful Things Pangborn settles down with Polly Chalmers, but no reference to this is made. Finally, it seems that in this show Alan Pangborn is cast as a sort of evil character and not the good-hearted hero that we know from Needful Things, which in the end feels like character assassination.
So to emphasis, why did this show take such a conflicted approach to the lore? It should have decided to be a faithful interpretation for the Constant Reader or an entirely new reinterpretation for the casual viewer. In its current form it does neither.
Secondly, the show seems to be confused as to whether it wanted to be a one off season or a multiple season story. This is illustrated by the number of unanswered questions: What was the scream/ roar Pangborn hears when Young Henry Deaver reappears? What was the purpose of the soundproof room Adult Henry Deaver is locked in - as well as the characters he encounters at the RV? Why did they present an entire episode trying to establish the Alternate Universe Henry Deaver as a regular guy lost in another universe, only to hard-handedly portray him as a demon in the final episode?
In regards to the Alternate Universe Henry Deaver it seems that they should have clarified his actual nature should this be a one season show. However, if this were to be a single season show, the episode desperately trying to portray him as a regular human mixed up in another universe, seems misleading and out of place.
Overall the show tries to whitewash these incongruities by passing them off as mysterious ambiguities that leaves the viewer guessing. But it fails in this attempt because it hasn't established enough of a coherent narrative that truly allows the viewer to make an educated decision. Instead we are left with conflicting evidence, plot pints, and lore that confuse the show instead of clarifying.
Ultimately, I believe these conflicting plot points and incongruities stem from the writers not knowing whether the show will continue in a second season (and therefore leaving some things unexplained) and whether the show is to be a faithful re-adaption of the Castle Rock universe. Because of these issues the show ends up being a conflicted mess. However, it is a watchable TV show and not the worst Stephen King adaption (by far).
Better planning in regards to the length of the show. And therefore what plots need to be discussed in which episodes/ seasons; as well as a definitive decision to be faithful to existing Castle Rock lore or a reinterpretation of Castle Rock, would have greatly enhanced the quality of this show.
2 out of 3 found this helpful.
Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Tell Your Friends