Reviews

85 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Vivre sa vie (1962)
8/10
The film assumes, in many scenes, a documentary, observational tone.
9 June 2022
Shot in black and white, the film is narrated in twelve frames. As in other films directed by Godard, the camera is an observer who follows Nana (Anna Karina) into the world of prostitution. The film assumes, in many scenes, a documentary, observational tone.

The script is not intended to explain much about Nana. Right off the bat, in a sensational shot, when she and the man she's talking to at a bar are shown from the back, but you can see Nana's face in the mirror in the background, we know the man is her husband who's separated, who left her son with him and who needs money. But it doesn't show us why. These are facts that interest the viewer to understand Nana's decision to prostitute herself.

Nana is cold, doesn't show feelings, with rare exceptions, namely, in the movies when she cries watching The Passion of Jeanne D'Arc, 1928 silent film directed by Carl Theodor Dreyer, and when she happily dances Swing! Swing! Swing!, music by Michel Legrand, in a bar, around pool tables, with the camera rotating 360º. Interesting to note that Anna Karina would return to dancing in a bar in an iconic scene from the film Band À Part, also directed by Godard, released two years after Vivre Sa Vie.

Even as a prostitute, Nana does not appear naked at any time and we also do not see sex scenes between her and her clients (there is only a hint in a brief passage in the hotel room where she worked as a prostitute).

Godard makes several quotes throughout the film, as usual. Starting with the intertitles that precede each of the 12 frames, which take us back to silent films, which used this device to change scenes. He also silences dialogues twice, putting subtitles so that we know what they are talking about, another reference to silent films, which were also in black and white. It puts an impacting scene from The Passion of Jeanne D'Arc of two more minutes, trying to make a parallel between the suffering of Joan of Arc, masterfully played by Renée Jeanne Falconetti, and the suffering of Nana, who cries at the same moment that the heroine also cries knowing that she will die at the fire. Godard also quotes The Three Musketeers, by Alexandre Dumas, shows a character reading Complete Works, by Edgar Allan Poe, and has a great dialogue between Nana and a gentleman at the bar table (Brice Parain), in which Plato and German philosophers are quoted, and they still philosophize about true love.

The soundtrack, composed by Michel Legrand, is a special case. In some scenes, the instrumental music punctuates what is going on with the main character, but is abruptly interrupted, as if it couldn't explain Nana's feeling.

The original title - Vivre Sa Vie - can have two connotations, as it can be read as living your life or as living as a prostitute, since, as in Portuguese, at the time the film was shot, prostitute was also called a woman of life.

Finally, Vivre Sa Vie has a tragic ending, a hallmark of several of Godard's films. This moral lesson at the end is what bothers me, but even so, it's a great movie and should be seen and reviewed by those who really love cinema.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Conservative and boring
9 June 2022
The third film in the franchise goes back to the beginning to show how the English secret society created during the First World War to act against evil began.

The comedy tone of the two previous films, both also directed by Vaughn, is lost in this prequel, which makes this new film more monotonous, with certain very boring passages, such as the attempt by Orlando Oxford, played by Ralph Fiennes, to protect his son Conrad from the dangers of the world, preventing him from going to war at all costs, which obviously doesn't work. We've seen this in countless films, of the most varied genres. Cliché to the nth power.

The film also misses the opportunity to innovate, even being set at the beginning of the 20th century, leaving aside facts that are now considered conservative, such as, for example, the English elite being the great savior of the world, always doing good and fighting evil. The elite always in charge, using the work of the most diverse servants to get their confidential information.

There is also a great concentration of the script on the two main characters, which is a shame, as Djimon Hounsou's talent is visibly underused.

Very good is the fight scene between Oxford and Rasputin, with proper use of special effects using CGI. Surreal, but well executed and with a very interesting sexual connotation.

I also highlight the costumes and the very detailed setting of the time in which the story takes place.

But while fun, it still works fine, although I prefer the previous two.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Beautiful filme about old age
1 June 2022
Wild Strawberries (Smultronstallet) is a 1957 Swedish production, in black and white, directed by Ingmar Bergman.

In the cast, also director Victor Sjostrom in the role of Izak, an elderly doctor who reviews his life while traveling in his car to another city in which he will receive an important award at Lund University. There is also the beautiful Bibi Andersson, a constant actress in Bergman's films, playing the double role (Sara/Hitchhiker). In the present, she is the young woman Izak gives a lift to, and in the past, the young woman the doctor courted.

Dreams and thoughts indicate that the famous doctor, with fifty years of profession, fears the approaching death.

In this whirlwind of thoughts, he rethinks his actions and approaches his daughter-in-law Marianne (Ingrid Thulin), his faithful maid Agda (Jullan Kindahl), also elderly, and his son Evald Borg (Gunnar Bjornstrand).

A contrast between the vigor of youth, both in the physique and in attitudes and debates, and old age, with an emphasis on wisdom, recognition for work and why not, the grumpy characteristic of the elderly.

Beautiful film about old age.

Reviewing it once more, this time for a class on the Bergman Cycle of the Film Analysis Club (Cinema with Theory), I transported myself to the 80s, in a hectic session of the Cine Clube of the Academic Directory of the Faculty of Economic Sciences at UFMG , where I graduated in Economic Sciences.

Right after the film was shown, in a poor VHS copy, the debate was heated, reproducing, in the school auditorium, the discussion about religion that young people have in one of the scenes of the film.

A must-see for all those who love cinema.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Misuse CGI
1 June 2022
I remember well when I went to see Death on the Nile, a film version directed by John Guillermin for the book by Agatha Christie, at the Cine Jaques, in Belo Horizonte. It was the late 1970s. Sessions were always full for a theater that held nearly 1,000 people at a time. As I was lining up to get in, on the sidewalk, the exit doors opened and a bunch of idiots walked by, loudly commenting on who the killer was. I didn't care much because I didn't care about spoilers since always and I knew the story because I had read the book a few months before. But it was a bucket of cold water for many who were in line. I left very satisfied with what I saw after more than two hours of projection. I never had the opportunity to see this film again.

We jump to 2022. A new version of the story of a murder on a cruise on the Nile River has been released in theaters. This time directed by and starring Kenneth Branagh, who plays the famous detective Hercule Poirot. I waited for the stream to arrive to check it out.

Branagh had a large cast, with many familiar faces like Tom Bateman, Annette Bening, Michael Rouse, Letitia Wright, Armie Hammer and Gal Gadot.

Vibrant colors set the tone throughout the film, with a great reenactment of the period and beautiful costumes. But the pace does not convince. The film, in many takes, seems monotonous, with an uninspired cast and a very orthodox direction.

But what bothers me the most in the film is the use of horrible special effects, really rough. Misused CGI is visible. The scene that most proves this fact is when Hercule Poirrot is sitting in a chair facing one of the pyramids in Cairo. It's not convincing that he's actually in that place.

It's a shame that such a good story was misused in this new version.

I still prefer the 1978 version.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Takedown (2022)
6/10
Typical afternoon session movie
1 June 2022
Take Down (Loin du Périph).

Once again, director Louis Leterrier and actor Omar Sy work together. After directing a few episodes of the great series Lupin, Leterrier is behind the camera in this French crime comedy available on Netflix.

It's a beat-up story, with two cops of different styles who haven't seen each other in a long time, having to work together to investigate a murder in a small French town.

Clichés after clichés, predictability, bad jokes. What saves is the always enlightened presence of Omar Sy, playing the police officer Ousmane Diakhité and some fun scenes between him and Laurent Lafitte, a member of La Comédie-Française, who in the film is the police officer François Monge.

It's a typical afternoon session movie, to watch, rest your head, laugh a little and then forget about it.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Scream (I) (2022)
6/10
More of the same
29 May 2022
First film in the franchise without Wes Craven at the helm, which was in charge of not one, but two people: Matt Bettinelli-Olphin and Tyler Gillett.

The directors managed to keep the essence of the saga, bringing once again the characters Sidney Prescott, Gale Weathers and Dewey Riley, the three played by the same actors since the beginning of the franchise: Neve Campbell, Courtney Cox and David Arquette. The events continue in the same city of the previous films and, once again, someone assumes the mask of Ghostface to terrorize the young people of the place.

To freshen up, thinking more about the continuity of the franchise, they introduced the character Sam Carpenter (Melissa Barrera), who has a connection with an important character from the first film. Sam Carpenter is the new Sidney Prescott.

In addition, the film continues to make fun of its own script and horror films, with many quotes in the dialogues of young people, in addition to a tribute scene to Psycho, with the shower running in the bathtub.

Of novelty, only the new girl, the goodbye of a central character of the saga, and the identity of Ghostface.

It pays homage to Wes Craven, the genius behind hit slasher movies like A Nightmare on Elm Street and Scream. A young character is named Wes, and the camera focuses on the name of one of the city's streets: Elm Street.

Because it's almost more of the same, the film is predictable and you can figure out who the killer is.

It doesn't innovate, but it doesn't do anything bad either.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Great movie
25 May 2022
Everything Everywhere All At Once, 2022, 139 minutes. Script and direction by Daniel Kwan and Daniel Scheinert. The cast includes Michelle Yeoh (Evelyn), Stephanie Hsu (Joy), Ke Huy Quan (Waymond), James Hong (Gong Gong), Jamie Lee Curtis (Deirdre) and Tallie Medel (Becky).

The hype surrounding this film has been huge, with many social media posts about it. I didn't want to see the trailer, reviews, or even read its synopsis. I went to check it out knowing nothing about Everything, Everywhere All At Once. By the end of the projection, I was impressed. It's a great movie.

Anyone who knows me knows how much it costs to rate a movie a 10. Everything, Everywhere All At Once was the eighth film that deserved a 10 for me out of the nearly 3,000 films I've seen throughout my life.

The film is perfect in every way. Original script, although with the feeling that I had already seen a lot of the things that were in it. It also could, because the writers-directors mixed several genres in the same film. There's adventure, there's kung fu, there's science fiction, there's comedy, there's drama, there's suspense, there's blood, there's beating, there's melodrama, there's everything. And this mix works really well. Everything connects.

The cast is fantastic, with an emphasis on Michelle Yeoh, who should appear on the best actress candidate lists at the awards for the 2022 films. Jamie Lee Curtis is a luxury supporting actress, which works very well to increase Yeoh's brightness in the scenes where the two are together.

Costumes, makeup, hair, production design, soundtrack, everything connects to form a uniform whole. Even the exaggerations in Joy's costumes have a reason for being within the script and don't bother.

The script still plays with this year's recurring theme in blockbuster movies: the multiverse. The story takes place in several parallel universes, where Evelyn assumes different identities, such as a chef, a singer or a laundry owner.

I also highlight the insertion of inclusion and diversity in history. There are Chinese immigrants who are small businessmen in the United States, there are LGBTQIA+ characters, there are elderly people, there is female empowerment, it touches on the importance of maintaining cultural traditions of a people (there is a Chinese New Year party).

The directors show that they understand a lot about cinema and that they are passionate cinephiles, as I identified several references to successful films, such as Kar-Wai's In The Mood for Love, Tarantino's Kill Bill, current Marvel movies, Brad Bird's Ratatouille, Hong Kong kung fu B-movies, Kubrick's 2001 A Space Odyssey, Forbidden Desire (film with three stories about lesbian couples), horror B-movies, slapstick comedy, John Carpenter's Halloween ( just having Jamie Lee Curtis is already a reference to this horror classic), among others.

And the ending reminded me the ending of another film that scores 10 in my evaluation, Blue Velvet, by David Lynch, with a happy ending that can be interpreted as an irony by the directors.

It's a movie to watch and review again and again as there are so many layers and nuances to discover.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Outer Range (2022– )
8/10
When western meets Lost, Dark and The Time Tunnel
10 May 2022
Amazon Prime series have been getting better and better, with well-constructed plots and a very good cast. I recently watched all eight episodes of Outer Range. I got more and more excited as I watched the chapters.

The script leaves mysteries and unanswered questions with each episode, which have an average duration of 58 minutes, which made me anxious to see another one.

Starring Josh Brolin, who plays farmer Royal Abbott, whose family has a feud with the Tillersons, also farmers and fence neighbors. It is a modern western, with quads and four-by-four trucks instead of horses (but these are also present in the Abbott family), and with an indigenous integrated into the community, being a lesbian indigenous police officer, who is running for the election to be sheriff of the county. The two families' feud is centered on the Abbotts' west pasture, where the show's great mystery lies, a round hole in the middle of the pasture. To spice up the mystery, Autumm, a backpacker, arrives at the Abbott farm, asking to camp. She will get involved with the whole family, always with the air of someone who has a big secret to reveal. And she still has the disappearance of Amy's mother, granddaughter of Royal and Cecilia (Lili Taylor).

Writer Brian Watkins blends elements of the western with suspense, adventure, mystery and science fiction. With the right to several deaths over the eight episodes.

Some of the mysteries are unraveled by the viewer in the last chapter, but many threads were still loose, giving rise to speculation and theories of all kinds, awaiting a second season.

When I finished, I was left with that taste of wanting more in my mouth when we delight in some delicious delicacy.

It has a Lost footprint, another Dark, and even older series, such as Bonanza and Time Tunnel.
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Seventh Seal
2 May 2022
I started to be interested in films outside the Hollywood standards when I saw Ingmar Bergman in an exhibition at the cine club of the Faculty of Economic Sciences of the Federal University of Minas Gerais, in 1983, where I was studying. Many of my friends say that Bergman's films are sluggish, slow, and boring. It's not my opinion. I agree that some are not easy to see, but I like most of the ones I've seen so far.

For many years, it was difficult to choose which of the films from the Swedish director's extensive filmography to put in my Top 3. My order of preference, until then, was Wild Strawberries, The Seventh Seal and Persona. Precisely these films are the subject, in addition to Cries and Whispers, of the Bergman Cycle of the Film Analysis Club, of which I have been a member since November 2021.

I reviewed The Seventh Seal for the 28/04/2022 class. As soon as I finished watching it, I was surprised by my reaction that I didn't like it as much as the other times I saw it. Of the latter, the slapstick comedy scenes inserted in such a deep drama, with a literally apocalyptic feel, bothered me a lot, since the book Revelation of the Bible is constantly quoted and/or staged. Apart from the aforementioned comedy, the film still impresses. Strong scenes of religious fanaticism allied with immolation to be able to enter the Kingdom of Heaven, waiting for death, not only for natural reasons of any living being, but also for the Black Death that ravaged the Middle Ages at the time the plot develops.

Max Von Sydow puts on a show as the knight who defies Death to a game of chess. Even knowing his end, he keeps stalling, getting more time to live, to return to his house, where only his wife was waiting for him. Bengt Ekerot is well characterized as Death: dark, sneaky, patient and scary.

Beautiful black and white photography with the intense use of light/dark, with clear references to German expressionism.

Most of the scenes are filmed outdoors, always showing the vastness of nature, be it the sea, the forest or the lands where the knight passes. These elements of nature, although finite, give the impression of being infinite, that they never end, in frequent contrast to the characters' waiting for death. Life passes, but those landscapes stay. They may even be altered, but they will remain in counterpoint to man's finitude.

A necessary film for anyone who likes to study cinema.

In my ranking, it lost his place to Persona, but remains in Bergman's Top 3.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Italian film with LGBTQIA+ theme
24 April 2022
Directed by Marco Simon Puccioni, with Filippo Timi (Paolo), Francesco Scianna (Simone) and Francesco Gheghi (Leone).

Italian film with LGBTQIA+ theme that escapes from recent plots for cinema/streaming of the same genre by showing a gay couple, Paolo and Simone, on the eve of completing 20 years together, having a child born from an artificial insemination with surrogacy offered by a friend of Paulo. Leone, the teenage son, has to do a school project showing everyday life, using as a basis what the youth publish on social networks. At school, he meets Giulia, a French girl just living in Rome, falling in love immediately. Her idea, along with Jacopo, her best friend, is to tell her family's happy story in the video to be presented as a school project. It turns out that things are not as they seem to be and there will be a series of twists until the conclusion of the story, with DNA testing, betrayal, secrets revealed, parties, drugs, nature and consolidation of friendships. In the end, it shows that every couple, straight or homo, lives the same situations within a relationship.

Unpretentious film, with an interesting script, precisely because it doesn't fall into the most common clichés of LGBTQIA+ films, being a cute romantic comedy, just that. It's to relax, enjoy without thinking too much.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Bergman is a genious
24 April 2022
Directed by Ingmar Bergman.

Three women, Karin (Ingrid Thulin) and Maria (Liv Ullmann), who are sisters, and Anna (Kari Sylwan), the maid, await the death of a fourth woman, Agnes (Harriet Andersson), Karina and Maria's sister. All inside a big house where the color red is almost omnipresent. The ticking of the clock's hands marks the slow passage of time, There is no music. Only women steeped in their feelings. Brief appearances of male characters: Karin's husband, Maria's husband, the family doctor.

The sisters do not have a good relationship, they are resentful, they have individual traumas. Karin hates the physical touch of another person, is cold, calculating, rational, lives in a bubble of lies. Maria is passion, she is desire, she is sex, she is hysterical, she is emotion. Anna is maternal, she is love, she is sisterhood, she is compassion. Agnes is the dying woman suffering from the pangs of her terminal illness. Everyone suffers in her own way.

Bergman said that the red used in the interior of the house is the color that symbolizes the interior of the human being, the color of his soul. But it is also the physical color of man's vital organs, such as the heart and lungs, in addition to being the color of the blood, which guarantees life pulsating in the veins. It is also the color of passion, mystery, sex, life. Even the fade out is red in this film, unlike the black color used in the overwhelming majority of existing films.

When Karin and Maria decide, for a moment, to make peace, initiating a pleasant dialogue, Bergman chooses to put on instrumental music, muffling the characters' voices, as if to tell the spectators to respect the sisters' intimacy. It is great.

The Swedish director has always liked to include aspects related to art in his films. In this one, we have the exquisite decoration with objects from the 18th century, the sporadic use of instrumental music, but the great highlight are the references to great works by renowned artists, such as the sculpture Pietà, by Michelangelo, in a beautiful scene in which Anna places Agnes in your arms. A scene that leads to a reflection on the duality of the love of the two: maternal love and carnal love.

One of the rare moments of happiness occurs in the final scene, with the sisters dressed in white, in the woods that surround the house, sitting on a swing. The camera takes a close-up on Agnes, whose expression is a mixture of joy and sadness. Happiness must be enjoyed at any moment, even if this moment is very short.

A film with many layers that gives rise to a multitude of analyzes and interpretations.

Bergman is a genius.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Batman (2022)
9/10
a great movie with a solid story
24 April 2022
Directed by Matt Reeves. The cast includes Robert Pattinson (Bruce Wayne / Batman), Zoë Kravitz (Selina Kyle / Catwoman), Jeffrey Wright (Lt. James Gordon), Colin Farrell (Penguin), Paul Dano (The Riddler), John Turturro (Falcone), Andy Serkis (Alfred), among others.

I've been a Batman fan since childhood. He was always my favorite hero. Adam West, the eternal Batman from the 1960s series, is my favorite, but Christian Bale in Christopher Nolan's trilogy rocked the composition of the character. As with a lot, I got a little hesitant when they announced Robert Pattinson as the new Batman. My pet peeve with him had been over since I saw The Lighthouse, but I didn't see him as the hooded avenger. My resistance disappeared within the first few minutes of screening the new film. Pattinson is sensational in the role, delivering a spectacular performance. There are scenes in which he conveys the feeling of Batman just by moving his eyes. He has already entered, for me, the gallery of unforgettable Batmans.

This new Batman doesn't follow any of the previous films. Matt Reeves focused on a fledgling Batman, more detective than hero. A Batman hated by police officers who see him as a masked vigilante who acts against the police's techniques. Batman is still violent, he beats up the bad guys, taking justice into his own hands. The ties to the police are still only with Gordon, who wasn't even a commissioner yet.

Many visual references to the cinema are in the nearly three hour duration of the film. The detective side of Batman immediately reminds us of films noir, while the constant rain in Gotham and the use of colors reminiscent of neon reminds us of Blade Runner. One of the most obvious scenes in relation to references is the Batmobile riding on fire like in Christine, those with a killer car.

Penguin is still not the villain as we know it, more a kind of assistant to Carmine Falcone, the almighty mafia who runs organized crime in Gotham. The Riddler is the great villain of the plot, intelligent and putting Batman in doubt. There is a meteoric appearance of the Joker in jail when he meets the Riddler. And it still has Catwoman as Batman's love interest, more in the role of an anti-heroine than a villain.

The option for the use of dark colors makes this Batman the darkest of all, but very well applied, as it demonstrates the humor of the hero in formation, full of doubts, trauma and anguish. The same can be said of makeup, with large dark circles under Bruce Wayne. Still in terms of makeup, Colin Farrell is unrecognizable as Penguin.

Well, its a great movie with a solid story.
4 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Executive order
22 April 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Directed by Lázaro Ramos, with the cast Alfred Enoch (Antônio), Seu Jorge (André), Taís Araújo (Capitu), Aldri Anunciação (Ivan), Adriana Esteves (Isabel), Mariana Xavier (Sarah), Renata Sorrah (Dona Izildinha) , Emicida (Berto), among others.

The screenplay is based on a play by Aldri Anunciação that played in 2011.

The story takes place in an uncertain future in Brazil, when blacks are called accentuated melanins. An authoritarian government issues an executive order, number 1888 (a reference to the year in which the Golden Law was signed in the country), which requires all citizens of African origin to move to Africa. The government guarantees the one-way ticket. Isabel is the head of the department that registers and sends such citizens out of the country. André, a photojournalist who maintains a blog, is one of those who question the government's orders. Capitu, a doctor married to Antônio, realizing that the police would forcibly remove her from attending to a man injured in the leg to be sent to Africa, manages to escape, saving a black mother with an albino daughter from the police, is rescued by Ivan and sheltered in a kind of quilombo, called an afrobunker by its members. Antônio and André are isolated inside their apartment, with the neighbor Dona Izildinha, a racist one, as Isabel's helper to make the two leave the apartment. Antônio doesn't know where Capitu is, but he doesn't leave his apartment. After much confusion and persecution, Capitu and Antônio meet again, being arrested by Isabel. But what seemed like a tragic ending... The premise is great, the mostly black cast is a rarity in Brazilian cinema, the discussion of structural racism is current, but the whole thing didn't work as it should. Still, I liked the movie. Deserved tributes to Marielle Franco, Ruth de Souza, Zezé Motta, Mestre Moa, among others, who appear in photographs, objects and graffiti in the film.

The photography in yellow tones and blurred images in the background were interesting artifices to represent a future era without the need for special effects or the use of futuristic objects.

As a highlight, I mention the great performances of Seu Jorge, Adriana Esteves, Taís Araújo and Renata Sorrah. I still don't like actor Alfred Enoch. The chemistry between him and Taís Araújo didn't work, the two didn't convince me as a couple in love. I found the performance of this English actor, son of a Brazilian, very forced, not because of the Portuguese, which sounds almost without an accent, but because of the performance itself. He didn't convince me at any point in the projection, unlike Seu Jorge, who plays cousin André, debauched, good-natured, who easily panics in difficult situations.

Lázaro Ramos' directing work is good and could improve a lot. The final scene, in which he appears, exudes a lot of emotion.
6 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Umma (2022)
4/10
It tries to be a horror movie, but it's a bad one.
18 April 2022
American production directed by Iris K. Shim, starring Sandra Oh (Amanda), Fivel Stewart (Chris) and Dermot Mulroney (Danny).

Synopsis from IMDb: "Amanda and her daughter live a quiet life on an American farm, but when her estranged mother's remains arrive from Korea, Amanda is haunted by the fear of becoming her own mother." Another horror movie from 2022 that is popular in the United States, but with very negative reviews. It doesn't have a serial killer, it doesn't have murders, it doesn't have blood spurting on the screen. It's a psychological horror, but the script is poorly conducted, with a waste of the talent of Sandra Oh, who, in some scenes, is noted to be uncomfortable in the role of Amanda.

Amanda's story is not convincing these days: with childhood trauma, she lives isolated with her daughter Chris on a farm, where they raise bees, selling honey to Danny, the only friend they have. The trauma includes the panic of electricity, not being able to have electric light on the farm, consequently, none of the devices that are inserted in our daily lives, such as computer and cell phone, are allowed. The fear of losing her daughter, who wants to go to college, potentiates Amanda's neuroses.

The plot wants to go to psychological horror, but it skids badly. Nothing happens, with Amanda's few hallucinations of her recently deceased mother, whose belongings are taken to her by an uncle. Confused, clueless, dragged. Nothing works in the movie. The ending is typical of silly movies.

Umma is mother in Korean.

It tries to be a horror movie, but it's a bad one.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
X (II) (2022)
8/10
Smart movie, even using and abusing the most classic horror movie clichés.
17 April 2022
X, 2022, 105 minutes. United States and New Zealand co-production directed by Ti West. In the cast, Mia Goth (Maxine), Jenna Ortega (Lorraine), among others.

I really like horror movies.

The film surprised me a lot, because it doesn't innovate anything, but it delivers a final result full of tension, massacre, deaths and action. Holds the attention. Maybe that's where the cat's leap of the script lies. On IMDb, the synopsis is perfect: "In 1979, a group of young filmmakers set out to make an adult film in rural Texas, but when their lonely, elderly hosts catch them in the act, the cast finds themselves fighting for their lives." By adult film, understand pornographic film.

All the clichés of a horror movie are present, as well as the most characteristic characters of a porn movie. There's the busty blonde addicted to sex, the virile black man with the huge dick, the innocent young woman who is starting in the world of porn movies, the exaggerated moans in sex scenes, the characters being alone in moments of tension and danger, the woman who swims naked in the lake, the fearless girl, the bad old men, a lot of screaming, someone always watching through the second floor window of the house, the macabre basement of the farmhouse, terrifying dreams, knives as instruments of murder, the need to go out and look for someone in the middle of the forest late at night, violent deaths with a lot of blood. And, as always, predictable ending, with the so-called "final girl", that is, there is only one woman left alive from the general massacre.

The director handles such clichés very well, taking the opportunity to pay tribute to great horror and suspense films: Psycho, Halloween, Jaws, The Texas Chainsaw Massacre are visibly mentioned during the film. The aesthetic is 1970s, especially the pornographic film script and the use of colors. The actors do not stand out individually, but the ensemble is great, with a lot of synergy in the scene.

Great introduction to the sex scene between the elderly couple. The visual citation of religion, especially Christianity, is constant throughout the film. A fine irony of the script.

Perhaps the success of audiences and critics, with high marks on Rotten Tomatoes and IMDb, can be explained by the fact that there is nothing supernatural about the story. All are people like us. The villains are mortal, flesh and blood, no one comes back from the dead, there is a bloodbath, with strong scenes (the death of the old lady is shocking) and the girl who survives is not left to be the poor thing, following her path to success , as can be seen from the television program that is tuned to the mansion on the farm, when the police arrive and see the massacre.

And there is yet another ironic tone in the sheriff's final speech regarding the contents of the director's camera that was shooting the pornographic film.

Smart movie, even using and abusing the most classic horror movie clichés.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Narcos: Mexico (2018–2021)
9/10
Great show
16 April 2022
I really like movies and series that have drug trafficking as a theme. Narcos Mexico, a spin-off of Narcos, another series that focused on Pablo Escobar's story in Colombia, shows drug trafficking in Mexico.

Based on real people and events, the series is a good thriller, with a lot of chasing, explosions and shootings. It has three seasons, all of which are available on Netflix, just like Narcos.

The third and final season is the busiest, showing the fight for control of drug trafficking in Mexico, with the drug going to the United States. Although with a perspective of the DEA, the North American department of combating drugs, the construction of the drug dealers characters is excellent, merit for the script and for the actors, who deliver excellent performances.

Hard reality, showing intrigues between the cartels for control of regions in Mexico, conspiracies, betrayals, brutal murders, government corruption, infiltration of people linked to drug trafficking in politics, the impotence of the DEA to succeed in the fight against drugs.

The third season shows the rise of El Chapo as the big boss of the Mexican drug trade, but it doesn't show him as the cold and feared commander he was. He's just another piece on the Mexican cartel's board. This would be for other seasons, but Netflix has confirmed the end of the series. For those who want to know the story of El Chapo, there are Mexican series and films that narrate it very well, also available on the same streaming platform.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dopesick (2021)
9/10
Sweeping
15 April 2022
I was curious when I read a review about the miniseries Dopesick, available on the Star+ platform, deciding to put aside my list of series to watch, skipping it.

The miniseries blew me away. There are eight episodes with an average duration of one hour each. I couldn't stop watching. I saw it all in two nights, five episodes the first night and three the next night.

It is engaging, has excellent actors, especially Michael Keaton (Dr. Samuel Finnix) and Peter Sarsgaard (Rick Mountcastle), the drama is based on real events, it is very well directed. The screenplay is based on the book by Beth Macy. In directing, four directors took turns in the episodes: Barry Levinson, Michael Cuesta, Patricia Riggen and Danny Strong.

The plot consists of the struggle of prosecutors in a small town in Virginia against Purdue Pharma, a pharmaceutical giant controlled by the Sackler family, whose owners were philanthropists, funding and supporting major museums around the world, such as the Metropolitan Museum of Art, in New York, which had a wing called the Sackler, and the Musée du Louvre in Paris. Purdue Pharma launched a more potent pain reliever than morphine, Oxycontin, with aggressively campaigning on small-town doctors to prescribe the new drug for any type of pain.

Lies, corruption, fights between family members, frustrations from prosecutors, threats, greed and ambition are present as we witness the pain of hundreds of families who have lost loved ones due to addiction acquired with the medicine. The situation became so worrying that even the US Department of State Drug Enforcement Administration joined the fight against Purdue Pharma. And here I highlight Rosario Dawson's role as an assistant director of the DEA.

An interesting device used by directors is the back and forth in time, not telling the story in a linear way. This holds attention, allows a better understanding of future events, leaving the viewer free to reflect on what really matters: the indiscriminate use of medicines.

When I finished the series, I had a mixed feeling of anger, disgust and concern about the pharmaceutical industry, with its advertising always showing happy and active people, but full of swindles behind it all.

Michael Keaton is perfect as a town doctor who lives off coal mining, adored by everyone and who sees his life transformed after he meets the pain reliever Oxycontin.

To think about.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Black Crab (2022)
5/10
Enjoy and then forget
15 April 2022
Directed by Adam Berg and starring Noomi Rapace (Caroline Edh).

Suspense, science fiction, adventure, action, drama and war are all present in this Swedish film. Six soldiers, all of them ice skaters, are recruited to transport a mysterious cargo across a frozen archipelago. Nobody can trust anybody. Caroline has extra motivation to arrive with the cargo intact at the destination. On the way, several obstacles, chases, bombings, exchange of fire, and, as expected, the team is getting short.

Beautiful images of icy landscapes, good interpretation of Rapace, but the plot loses a lot with unconvincing characters and excessive duration of the crossing on the ice.

The director also failed to convey to viewers the tension that the characters experience throughout the journey they make with the mysterious cargo.

It's one of those movies to watch, enjoy the moment and then forget about it.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Hunt (2012)
7/10
The Hunt
14 April 2022
Directed by Thomaz Vinterberg, with Mads Mikkelsen (Lucas) and Annika Wedderkopp (Klara).

Lucas works at a kindergarten in a small Nordic town. He has a quiet life with his friends, is separated from his wife and dreams of having his teenage son live with him. One of the friends has a daughter, Klara, a child who uses her imagination too much. She attends the same kindergarten where Lucas works. Lucas starts a relationship with a foreigner who also works at the school. All is well until Lucas finds himself involved in a gossip that transforms his life completely.

Interesting theme about the consequences that baseless gossip causes to a person. And how the nefarious perpetuation of the lie is something uncontrollable, becoming absolute truth for many. See fake news on social networks and WhatsApp groups today.

The title move with Lucas' situation was a good move. On the one hand, we have Lucas and his companions as deer hunters in the forest that surrounds the city where they live, including Lucas' son's "rite of passage" from child to adult, when he becomes a hunter and receives a rifle as a gift. On the other hand, Lucas becomes the prey of the townspeople, including his closest friends. The final scene illustrates this duality well.

As always, Mikkelsen gave himself to the role of Lucas, delivering an excellent performance.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Knives Out (2019)
8/10
Agatha Cristie's school
11 April 2022
Screenplay and direction by Rian Johnson, with a stellar cast: Daniel Craig (Benoit Blanc), Chris Evans (Ransom Drysdale), Ana de Armas (Marta Cabrera), Jamie Lee Curtis (Linda Drysdale), Don Johnson (Richard Drysdale), Toni Collette (Joni Thrombey), LaKeith Stanfield (Elliot), Christopher Plummer (Harlan Thrombey).

I remember when this movie opened in theaters. I was looking forward to seeing it, especially it has Daniel Craig in the cast, my favorite actor in every way. But I didn't have time to go to the cinema while it was showing. It's been available on Amazon Prime for a long time, but I always left it for later. Anyway, at dawn on a Sunday, I accessed the streaming platform to check out this film.

It's long, but it doesn't get tired. The screenplay is well written, much like Agatha Cristie's detective books. Even Detective Benoit Blanc has one of Hercule Poirot.

The plot follows an investigation into the suicide of patriarch Harlan Thrombey, a millionaire writer, who turns up dead in his room in the mansion where he lived. He leaves two children, a son-in-law, a daughter-in-law, two grandchildren and a caregiver. There are doubts whether it was suicide or murder. Intrigues, with everyone in the family being suspects and accusing each other, twists, power struggle, will reading and an unusual revelation, only for us spectators, in the middle of the film, of the identity of who caused the death of the writer.

The photography in yellowish tones inside the mansion enhances the atmosphere of tension between the characters.

The film holds attention until the end, even with the revelation of the culprit before its conclusion.

Due to its critical and public success, Netflix hired Rian Johnson to write and direct two more sequels.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ascension (III) (2021)
7/10
Hard work
30 March 2022
Documentary nominated for the Oscar 2022 directed by Jessica Kingdon, an American of Chinese origin.

The film differs from many recent documentaries in that it doesn't have those interviews with people sitting there looking at the camera, nor does it have a narrator to drive the story. The director's camera only observes, sometimes from afar, sometimes up close, the daily lives of workers in the poignant Chinese economy.

In the name of productivity, anything goes, especially the exploitation of workers. It is almost incomprehensible to me to see a recruitment of workers by major Chinese industries stating that the work can be done sitting down or that no health examination is required to enter. Others shout that the work is done 100% standing, demand maximum height of the worker, that workers will sleep in rooms with up to eight people in the same room, or hear that whoever decides if the duration the worker worked that day is their boss.

Perhaps because of her origins, in the end, the director tries to glamorize the toughness she showed, putting on the screen moments of relaxation of hundreds of Chinese in a water park, as if she wanted to convey the message: "work without limits pays".

As there are almost no lines, and when there are, they are dialogues between the workers, with long scenes, the documentary gets monotonous from the middle.

Anyway, it was valid to know the reality of Chinese workers.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Great
30 March 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Directed by Jon Watss, with a millionaire cast: Tom Holland (Peter Parker), Zendaya (MJ), Benedict Cumberbatch (Dr. Strange), Jacob Batalon (Ned Leeds), Jaime Foxx (Max Dillon), Willem Dafoe (Norman Osborn / Green Goblin), Alfred Molina (Dr. Octopus), Andrew Garfield (Peter Parker), Tobey Maguire (Peter Parker), Marisa Tomei (Aunt May), Jon Fraveau (Happy Hogan).

The script is interesting as it opens up the multiverse, bringing endless possibilities to the adventures of Marvel heroes, including rescuing iconic villains defeated by Spider-Man in previous films. It was a great idea to bring together the villains, played by the same actors, the three Peter Parker/Spider-Man from across the franchise. So we had back Tobey Maguire and Andrew Garfield, both from other universes. They kept the same costume design that each wore in their films.

Spider-Man is the most humorous Marvel hero. In this new adventure, good humor remains throughout the projection, with great dialogues between the three Peter Parkers, who make comparisons of what each one does in their universe. The scene where Peter Parker (Tobey Maguire) casts his web from his own wrist is hilarious, as Peter Parker (Tom Holland) and Peter Parker (Andrew Garfield) want to know how he manages to do it, as the first buys his web of Stark companies and the second makes his web in his laboratory.

In this new phase of Spider-Man, he always has the help of his girlfriend MJ and Ned, two characters without powers but fearless. The empowerment of the female characters MJ and Aunt May are remarkable, a big difference from the first films.

What is missing is more malice on the part of the villains. Dr. Octopus and Norman Osborn become docile and even try to help Peter Parker.

Since at the beginning of the movie, Spider-Man's identity is revealed, it was a good way they found to make everyone forget who Peter Parker was at the end of the movie.

Fun, adventure, top-notch special effects, good humor are guaranteed for the entire duration of the film.

The participation of Dr. Strange is fundamental in this film, as it is he who manages to open doors to the various universes, in addition to preparing the viewer for the second film of this other Marvel hero.

There are two post-credits scenes, one in the middle and one at the end.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Terrible
29 March 2022
Fourth film in the Hellraiser franchise, this time under the direction of Kevin Yagher, continuing the script by Peter Atkins.

Yagher did not like the final result of the film, as the editing was left to the producers, who did not even want to sign as director, using the pseudonym Alan Smithee, which was the pseudonym that signaled to the industry that the director did not like the film that was released. . The movie is really bad. Very bad actors for a bad script. In 85 minutes, the film manages to condense the 18th century, the present day (1990s) and the future in sideral space, to try to justify that the magic cube used to invoke the evil of hell was built by a wooden toy maker and that his male lineage always is dealing with something involving the cube.

Doug Bradley continues to appear as Pinhead and I like the way the character speaks, paused, consistent and menacing at all times. But in this film, it was kind of awkward, because the evil entity Angelique (Valentina Vargas) wants to appear more than he does.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Third
27 March 2022
Horror films that become franchises always have the same master line of script. There's going to be a fearless girl, some guys who summon evil, and, in the case of Hellraiser, there's the famous Pinhead, leader of the Cenobites.

This third film in the Hellraiser saga was directed by Anthony Hickox, with the director of the previous film, Tony Randel, serving as co-writer. The cast excludes the unimpressive actors of the first two films, with more convincing people in their roles, such as Terry Farrell, who plays reporter Joey Summerskill. Apart from Pinhead, who continues to be played by Doug Bradley, there is a quick appearance by Kirsty, the main character of the first two films.

Joey witnesses the arrival of a wounded man with chains hanging from his body at the hospital where she was recording for television, and sees the wounded man's skin come off the body. With the man, a woman arrived who soon left running, but Joey manages to know where to find her, leaving for the bar Charboiled, where Pinhead is trapped in a stone tower, as we saw at the end of the second film. Drops of blood fall on that tower, awakening the monster, who makes a pact with the owner of the bar to feed on other people until he manages to free himself from that prison. Joey, through dreams, receives the human form of Pinhead, who guides her how to take the monster to his dimension, where he would take care of destroying him. Joey, with the cube in hand, will be pursued by new monsters, created by Pinhead, until the end of the movie.

This time it seems there were more features than in the first two films, as the special effects are very convincing, but it's the makeup that stands out, especially with the characterization of the monsters. No more Cenobites are mentioned, they are simply monsters. The script is full of flaws, holes, because a lot is left unexplained, but the most bizarre are the continuity errors. In one of the final scenes, Joey, with the cube in one of the hands, is running away from the monsters, when there is a cut, she appears without the cube, another cut, she has the cube, one more cut, and again without the cube in hands. It can be overlooked, as the focus is on Joey's rush through the city streets and explosions, but a closer look realizes this mistake.

It's fun.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Robin Robin (2021)
4/10
Cute, but boring
26 March 2022
Animation short film directed by Daniel Ojari and Michael Please that is nominated for an Oscar 2022.

It's one of those cartoons with cute characters, with a different texture in the lines of the drawings, with a message about the importance of recognizing diversity and promoting inclusion. But it's boring.

The script is ordinary, already explored hundreds of times in films and animations. A bird, when hatching, is welcomed by a family of mice, where the maternal presence does not exist. She grows up believing she is a mouse. Feeling that she has hindered the mice in their search for food, she goes alone to try to show that she can be a good mouse, encountering obstacles along the way, like an evil cat, and befriends a bird that can't fly because its wing is broken. Humans appear only as shadows.

Despite the current message of knowing how to live with the different, there are not very positive messages in the short.

The female figure is always seen on the negative side: the bird is clumsy, does everything wrong; the cat embodies evil, it has the face of few friends, it wants to eat the mice and birds, and the human shadow that identifies the robin's mess in her house is a woman that the animal characters treat like a monster. The directors try to redeem themselves at the end, because it is the robin that saves everyone from that cat.

Another negative point is the exaltation of the act of stealing, practiced and praised by the rat family, which always steals crumbs and leftover food from human homes.

Anyway, I didn't like it.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

Recently Viewed