Reviews

6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
The real life story of two poets
12 March 2013
Kelebegin Ruyasi centers around the real life journeys and hardships endured by poets Muzaffer Tayyip Uslu and Rustu Onur. Staged to the backdrop of 1940s Turkey and at Zonguldak (a city still known best for its coal mine tragedies) the two young poets try to survive and create in an environment where even writing paper is scarce. Full of life and love for poetry Onur and Muzaffer live a poor but content life: both work for the government, one as a blue color worker in an office the other as an officer at the coal mines... The seemingly happy life change with the entrance of a Suzan Olsoy, a government high official's daughter involved in sports and better represented here with her beauty. Muzaffer and Onur both suffer from tuberculosis and love (love for poetry and romantic other). Their illness and love see them moving to Heybeliada (a medical center) and then to 1940s Istanbul...

With every Turkish movie released in theaters it has become a common place act to talk up the movie, often to the heights of 'one of the best movies ever made'. This was the case with the last Yılmaz Erdogan movie I watched (Neseli Hayat)... I often leave the theater feeling I have been lied to. Because often these movies turn out to be mediocre if not well below mediocre. But thank god this was not the case here! On that note let me make my last point first: Kelebegin Ruyasi is the only other good movie made by Yilmaz Erdogan since Vizyontele. This movie needs to be watched and watched carefully too! Second yet foremost, the DOP and Art Directors have done a magnificent job, to the degree and effect of best similar works in world cinema. The picture has a great quality reminiscent of works of Guiseppe Tornatore: the visuals have added tremendously to the storytelling and the reality through which the era is captured makes the movie more grounded. The cinematography alone is a great reason to watch the movie.

On the acting side the movie gives four great performances and the rest is but preconceived if not below average. Kivanc Tatlitug, a model turned actor has really outdid himself. He has the subtle approach of a seasoned actor and though his nail-biting is seen at first as a 'character kitsch' the audience soon gets over it and enjoys the tour-De-force that this Kivanc. He has brought Muzaffer to life without any unnecessary arabesque pitfalls. Second actor worth noting is Yilmaz Erdogan himself. His portrayal of Behcet Necatigil is unmistakably to the point: the tired looks, the hope that survives in his eyes, the limited motioned acting technique, the gentleness of the voice of a poet. I tend to dislike even the idea of a 'actor-director' but Mr Erdogan pulls it off very well, and by casting himself (also a good poet) as a seasoned poet and giving himself very limited time on screen he reminds the audience that this is 'their story' not 'his'! A very valuable take that he has missed and hence done wrong with in his previous movies (again, all his filmography but Vizyontele falls under this)... Next Ms. Farah Zeynep Abdullah! Her presence on the screen makes the audience happy every time her gentle yet tranquil face appears. Just like Mr. Tatlitug she too has portrayed a terminally ill person beautifully without a slight nuance of overacting. Lastly though he appears briefly Taner Birsel gives a great performance as Muzaffer's father.

The rest of the cast does a OK job (take Mert Firat as Rustu) or a horrible job (take Belcim Erdogan as Susan)...

On that latter name: casting Belcim Bilgim (30 years old) as a high-school student was purely ABSURD if not BAFFLING. Yes she is actor-director Mr Erdogan's wife and most likely this is the reason she got the part but more than the movie this choice of cast has and will effect her negatively: Belcim Erdogan is a good actress with potential to become a great screen persona but such acts of being cast as a 16-17 year old can and will only hurt her perception: to the degree that every time she showed up with a school uniform half of the people at the cinema laughed out loud! If the rest of the movie was not so good, her unnecessary and absurd choice of lead actress could be enough to destroy the movie!

The script is above average, with great dialogs yet bad character development! The latter is the reason for the movie's half an hour extra long duration: we keep seeing the struggle and the love for poetry through first half of the movie that could be cut down with better 'showing' and less 'telling'. Mr Erdogan who comes from a theater background masterfully writes dialogs but when it comes to storytelling with a film medium he proves not to be that much in control of the apparatus, specially scripting techniques. Hence the movie keeps going into repetitions (Susan-Muzaffer scenes) and worst it looses its dramatic build up where the last half an hour rushes to tie all the stories and bring it to closure. I was little saddened by the fact that this story was so linear! when the lives and works of these poets were so none-linear! I mean this guys were poets of Garip Akimi, they revolt against traditional poetry yet their lives has been captured as a linear story? But that's beside the point!

Lastly editing: with such great cast and crew this movie definitely needed a better editor! One who knows how 'not' to cut the flow of the picture and feelings abruptly.

All in all this is a great achievement for Turkish cinema and ALL must go and see it because it is pointing to the right direction where cinema needs to go and takes a few solid steps at the same time.
33 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A hand belonging to a teenage girl is found in the river, and with this find starts our journey to the unknowns of few people's lives
6 December 2010
Av Mevsimi (Hunting Season) is in certain terms as good as a production can get in Turkey: great cast, great cinematography, great sets, state of the art technology unfortunately though the great production could not be translated into a good movie. Yavuz Turgul is a masterful screenwriter, the best in Turkish cinema history for sure. He knows his mathematics very well. He was time and again proved this since Muhsin Bey. There is no hole in his scripts which is impossible for other Turkish films and scripts that contain more holes than swiss cheese. Mr Turgul has had the self made fortune of collaborating with Sener Sen for over 30 years now! Sener Sen has not appeared in any movie that was not written by Turgul. Hopefully after this his mind will change. Because as masterful as Mr Turgul is with script mathematics he is just as unimaginative and lacks creativity when it comes to tuning that mathematics with great story lines, engaging characters and witty developments. Unfortunately he keeps repeating himself and regardless of whether he is writing about an old time bandit (eskiya), a teacher who has returned to his Istanbul home after years at Anatolia outskirts (gönül yarası), a Mafioso who still embraces old ethic codes like a samurai (kabadayı) or as with this picture about a forensic chief he is depending on the same main character and similar web of story lines. Every main character Mr Turgul created since Eskiya have been the same and unfortunately he alone has access to Turkey's tour de force actor Sener Sen. The acting and directing in the movie has been the most disappointing aspects of the picture for me: at times the acting is raw, at times authentic and at other times comical (Çetin Tekindor's delivery of last lines). The Turkish media and critics that is composed of a few monkeys scratching each other's back and never writing anything bad about bad movies made by influential people has of course spoken of this picture too as a 'masterpiece'. Unfortunately it is not! Especially the acting of Cem Yılmaz, a loved persona by myself too, doesn't get better than any of the characters from Turkish police TV series such as Arka Sokaklar. The storyline never gets interesting or clever. At an age when CSI and similar TV series are putting such emphasis on the storyline, Hunting Season manages to be as interesting as an episode of CSI NY, and nothing more. Compared to Millennium Trilogy it is a movie for people who have no idea about the genre. The music selection was good but Mr Turgul has for the first time agonized me with his use of music as a mood pusher. The music always makes itself more than apparent! Which is very sad as the use of music has always been one of Mr Turgul's strenghts. Editing and the overly washed light footage are other inconsistent elements of the movie. At times the editing reminds one of Svankmayer's pieces: creating an alter persona through blurring of images and movement of the camera close to the face however this (as with Tekindor's last scene) makes the movie more comical than anything! The worst aspect yet of the movie was the unnecessary voice over! If anyone catches the meaning of that voice over please explain as all it did was push feelings down the throat of the audience in arabesque ways and it didn't even have a finely tuned closure. 5 stars for what Mr Turgul means to Turkish Cinema and regardless of how disappointing he has been still the contribution Cem Yılmaz will have to the same art.
22 out of 60 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Two Turkish cops travel to New York to accompany a convict back to Turkey, but all gets out of hand
4 November 2010
Mahsun Kirmizigul, apparently a good cinema follower, has made 3 collages in disguise of films so far, and this is the last ring in the chain. I call them collages as the simple mindedness of his scripts, the shallowness of his characters and the story lines all lack depth and are geared towards the same ideal: capitalizing on a hot topic without any attention paid or merit put into the work itself. In 'White Angel' Mahsun took advantage of issue of elderly, in 'I saw the Sun' he tried to collage together bits and pieces from the films of Yilmaz Guney and Tunc Okan to tackle the issue of forced immigration and the what so called 'Kurdish Issue'. The same singer turned writer/director and capitalist had joined in the protests towards the remarks of Ahmet Kaya during a awards ceremony where all he said was 'I am gonna shot a video to a Kurdish song and I know there are courageous people out there shot and view it'. Mahsun, also a Kurd but a self denying Kurd until recently when pressure on Kurds and Kurdish was lifted, joined into protest Kaya's remark. Yet few years later he was in the forefront of making money off lift of ban of Kurdish. Currently the hottest topic around the globe is Islamic terrorism vs peaceful nature of Islam and of course Mahsun just had to make a movie about this. Again the storyline is so shallow that I felt embarrassed as a film-goer, secondly acting couldn't be worse and the use of such actors as Danny Glover in unnecessary ways was just mind numbing (and how did danny glover said yes to this picture after reading the script is my million dollar question), thirdly the movie is nothing more than a salud to one of Turkey's controversial religious leaders who is loved by millions but also feared by millions too. And in this last point is the totality of the movie Five Minarets In New York: it never manages to become a story or a good tale, it is from the finish to the end a product, a commercial. The cinematography, effects and such are tremendously well made but then again all that just depends on having the money. Mahsun is not an artist but rather a calculating machine lacking intellectual depth and creativity. I am sure one of his next projects will be Holocaust through the eyes of a 1940s Muslim politician (or something) played by, of course him.
72 out of 168 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dragon Trap (2010)
4/10
A serial killer hunts down released ex-cons convicted of pedophilia in a setting where corridors represent the mind and the city is a corridor!
27 January 2010
The film's story-line in a nutshell is: A serial killer hunts down released convicts who did time for pedophilia related charges. Two police officers Akrep Celal and Commissioner Abbas are out to get Istanbul's first serial killer, whom all the visible traces suggest to be Ensar, a young man who just returned from his army service and has lost a sibling to pedophilia!

First of all lest just mention the ONLY positive thing about his film: the CAST! Director and actor Ugur Yucel manages to use his persona and connections very well to bring together gorgeous Kenan Imirzalioglu and psychotic looking, mad-acting Nejat Isler in the same movie! This is the equivalent of having Brad Pitt and Christian Bale in the same picture with Robert De Niro as the director and mentor. Good, no? Well not really! Not when the rest of the cast is composed of FLESH and not actors. Berrak Tuzunatac, a beautiful face placed on a big and curvy body and Ceyda Duvenci, looks that loose meaning after staring for 5 seconds, as well as all other co-actors make this what-could-have-been a well ensemble cast look like they were put together not to make a good movie but to make few bucks of the talent and name of some and the body and sexuality of others! I am afraid this is the case with Dragon Cage!

Now to the constructive criticism as to the very nisch-nischs of this movie. If Ugur Yucel is to look back to the failure of this movie in a few weeks (and fail this movie will at the box office) and ask why, he should be told: It's the script you stupid! Ugur Yucel might be one of the best actors of Turkish cinema and definitely a GREAT director based on his first two movies. Looking at these facts one would assume he would know what a bad script is when he reads it. Seems not! The script for Ejder Kapani is not only a bad montage made from similar famous movies (seven, crimson rivers...) but it lacks any local taste it could have inserted and gave a taste of originality with! The storyline is obvious and it gives itself away from minute 10 and the dialogs, oh the dialogs! Could they have been more obvious?!

As a good director, based on his previous two films, Mr Yucel does a less than OK job directing here. The films editing and pace never match, mood building scenes of walking and chasing are the SAME all across the film, the city is meant to be turned into a labyrinth through camera angles and dark choice of film footage however it lacks the, again, locality of Istanbul and all the 'fear' and 'expectations' are pushed on the audience by simply making the screen darker and the music heavier! And the music! Oh lord when will my people learn to not do what Hollywood stopped doing 30 years ago? Mood pushing music? Really! The worst part of Mr Yucel's directing though is closely associated with the film's greatest strenght: the cast! Main characters over act too much! Which brilliant mind thought that casting Kenan Imirzalioglu as an angry police officer and Nejat Isler as a psychotic looking type is a good idea, hasn't both been done many a times before?! Why do they allow to be type-casted is another question and worry I have!

The movie fell very short of what I was expecting and it was the one movie I have been looking forward to the most in Turkey this year! Avoid it!
24 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Yahsi Bati (2009)
4/10
Contemporary Turkish sense of humor in the wild west
4 January 2010
Warning: Spoilers
The movie follows the story of two Turks on a mission from the Sultan to deliver a diamond to the American president as a sign of good faith and strong ties. It also is a story within a story as the former is being told by what seems like a con-man trying to sell a worthless pair of boots to a rich collector, and the film's story is a made up by the con-man to authenticate the boots.

The movie itself too, unfortunately, gives the feeling that it was made up on the spot by a half witted con-man, not Turkey's leading comedian and definitely not a filmmaker! Cem Yilmaz is the name that made smart comedy and stand up popular in Turkey, he is both the Robbie Williams and Ricky Gervais of Turkey. Mirroring the success of his 10 year long stand up career, his earlier films 'Everything will be Beautiful' and GORA were also hugely successful both in terms of box office and the audience response. Although GORA and its follow up AROG are high budgeted Scare Movie equivalents of Turkey, they too had certain quality in terms of their comedy as time, energy and brains were put in to their scripts, even though AROG was a huge disappointment in terms of its comedy.

Yahsi Batı, however, is a new low not only in Mr. Yilmaz's filmography but that of Turkish comedy! The movie is hardly comedic, save two scenes (one of being robbed the other where the characters meet the heroin of the movie), its story line is beyond obvious and it manages to be boring in every sense of the word after 20 minutes. Interestingly enough after 20 minutes the movie shows its true intentions: being the longest and most expensive Cola Turca commercial EVER! Let me put it this way, the main sponsor, Cola Turca has spend enough money on the movie to make its brand more obvious and in your face than Ipod was in Blade 3!

I will not even bother to discuss this commercial as a film, it lacks everything from story line to dialog to acting to editing. What it has is plenty swear words, partial nudity, good picture quality and Mr Yilmaz's hard to hate face. But I must admit, I started hating that childish face of his after 2.5 hours stolen from my life.

Do yourselves a favor: STAY AWAY from this commercial!
21 out of 62 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Jolly Life (2009)
5/10
Riza, a poor fellow living in Istanbul suburbs, has to work as Santa at a shopping mall leading up to Christmas
29 November 2009
I have just watched this movie together with 8 other people in a rather western Istanbul mall, fitting to the movie itself. Being it the holiday season I was at once struck with the little number in attendance since Yilmaz Erdogan is a popular name in Turkish cinema and media. I sincerely hope the low number attending the movie with me will be the same across all cinemas in Turkey and abroad as this movie was/is a true disappointment both to capacity of Yilmaz Erdogan as a writer/comedian and that of the remaining cast. I am afraid the possible box office success of this movie, thanks to the partisan Turkish media and film critics who always lack good taste and courageous comments when it comes to the works of people like of Yilmaz Erdogan, will add to the future failure of Turkish cinema since a shallow movie like this being described as "profound" will set the "profound" and "good film" limits rather low.

The story line is as follows: Riza is a 40-some year old living in Istanbul suburbs. He has made numerous bad investment decisions in the past, one of which was involvement in a Madoff-like scheme that bankrupt him as well as numerous friends from the neighborhood. Now his old friends are taking Riza's old company, Neseli Hayat Sirketi/Joyful Life Company to the court which means Riza himself will also have to pay for the damages caused by and money lost through the scheme of Neseli Hayat. He needs money to pay for a lawyer yet that is exactly what he is thin on. Furthermore he lives in a country with +10% unemployment rate and there aren't many jobs, specially leading to Christmas. On top of it all golden-hearted Riza has to pay for his brother in law's wedding, since the brother in law has impregnated his girlfriend and the failure to marry her before the new year means eminent death by the girlfriend's parents. So Riza picks up a job as Santa at a rather fancy shopping mall in Istanbul. He has to Ho-ho-ho clients in a toy store in a Muslim country that does not uphold the Santa tradition (even if St Nicholas is believed to have lived in Southern Turkey).

First of all: the story, that of an average Joe/Riza, who at heart is a fur ball of goodness but is, as Turkish scripts often go, caught up in between undesired hardships of life never gets any depth. Riza as well as the hardships he faces are brushed by and around. We never truly feel the dilemmas or excitement of Riza as a human-being. The rest of the characters are written even worse, we do not care for any characters least their hardships, which proves to be rather problematic since it seems no one is trouble-free. These characters are not life like, by which this humble viewer means not that they are not real but rather not written to serve their own existence in the storyline: no flesh or soul only solid forms put on screen to bounce back dialog or to create caricature-like moments that try to pass as comedy. Which brings us to the second point: comedy! This movie is NOT a comedy and it failed miserably at making me laugh let alone smile. Moments when this self-claimed comedy is most comic like coincide with few actors doing impressions alluding to a popular TV show, Cok Guzel Hareketler Bunlar, with majority of the actors from this movie and also produced by Mr Erdogan himself. The fact that writing of Neseli Hayat fails to make the audience feel sadness or smile at a movie that is described as a comedy-drama also adversely affects acting. As a firm believer in the great potential of all the actors in this film it was sad to see how everyone underperformed and overacted. While this can be attributed to the bad script and even worse directing, Mr Erdogan manages to be give an impressive effort in acting Riza. He is a good actor but still in this film, thanks to the bad writing, he tries to act rather then to be Riza. The other 6 people in the audience kept laughing at every appearance by Ersin Korkut playing the "rapist" brother in law, admittedly a funny looking fellow who won the hearts of millions in the above-mentioned TV show. However with his sense of comic and comedy limited to Turkish spoken with a heavy Kurdish-Turkish accent, Mr Korkut, seemingly a great guy, adds to the OK racism ingrained in Turkish daily life. Mr Korkut delivers to the audience-et-large exactly what they want to see and laugh at: a looser that is laughed at and drawn as not-Turkish due his "none Turkish" accent. A comparable act and character in American cinema would be more than enough to paint the actor, the picture and its creator as promoting racism. Last but not least: the art direction in this film was beyond horrible! Both my date and I were dumbstruck as to how poor, unobservant, disregarding and not fitting the decors and mis-en-scene were. But thanks to the horrible music that constantly reminded us of the earlier use of music in cinema as a mood pusher, art direction escapes being the poo in the pad. 5 stars but only due my love for Mr Erdogan's early work.
11 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed